social stakeholders: business case for corporate ...f137596c-b72a-4c75...provide a broad-based...
TRANSCRIPT
Business Stakeholders – Social Stakeholders:
Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
With reference to the strategic management concept"Stakeholder View“
Dr. Thomas Streiff
Partner
Streiff - 2019
Table of Contents
• Starting point:
The underlying theory
Explaining the business case for stakeholder
management and corporate sustainability
• The cases:
Barry Callebaut
Novo Nordisk
• Conclusions
2
Streiff - 2019 3
Starting point:
• Key points of the normative stakeholder management
theory
• Explaining the business case for stakeholder
management and corporate sustainability
Streiff - 2019 4
Starting point 1:
Improving social welfare
Four criteria to improve social welfare:
C1: Realistic assessment of the nature of economiccompetition
C2: Trusting firm-stakeholder relationships
C3: Accounting for negative externalities
C4: Corporate objectives focus directly on well-being ofstakeholders
„Normative stakeholder theory holds that managers have amoral responsibility to regard the interests of certaincorporate constituents groups, including shareholders, aslegitimate.“
Source: Jones & Felps, 2013
Streiff - 2019
Four criteria to improve social welfare
C1: Corporate objectives based on realistic assessments ofthe nature of economic competition will provide greatersocial welfare than those based on unrealisticassumptions
C2: Corporate objectives that encourage efficiencies basedon trusting firm-stakeholder relationships will providegreater social welfare than those that assume thatefficient firm behavior depends on the pursuit of selfinterest.
C3: Corporate objectives will provide greater social welfareto the extent that they explicitly account for the costs ofnegative externalities.
C4: Corporate objectives that focus directly on the well-beingof legitimate stakeholders will provide greater socialwelfare than those simply equate economic and socialwelfare.
5
Source: Jones & Felps, 2013
Streiff - 2019 6
Starting point 2:
Stakeholder management key principles
Principle 1:The corporation (firm) should be managed for the benefit ofits stakeholders: its customers, suppliers, owners,employees, and local communities. The rights of thesegroups must be ensured, and, further, the groups mustparticipate, in some sense, in decisions that substantiallyaffect their welfare.
Principle 2:Management bears a fiduciary relationship to stakeholdersand to the corporation as an abstract entity. It must act inthe interests of the stakeholders as their agent and it mustact in the interests of the corporation to ensure the survivalof the firm, safeguarding the long-term stake of each group.
legitimate
Beyond survival ?!Source: Evan & Freeman (1988, p. 103)
Streiff - 2019 7
Corporate sustainability & stakeholder orientation
Profitability
Socialresponsibility
Environmentalresponsibility
Engagement
Stakeholders
Creating shared value
Maintaining long-termcompetitiveness
Streiff - 20198
Corporate sustainability – level of ambition
Source: WWF UK/Doughty Hanson Co. (2011): Private equity and responsible investment: an opportunity for value creation
Streiff - 2019
Why strategic stakeholder management impactsthe market value of a company
Source: BHP, PricewaterhouseCoopers
9
Physical Assets
Financial Capital
Ta
ng
ible
sIn
tan
gib
les
Financial Capacity“Retrospective”
Strategic Capability“Prospective”
• Intellectual Capital• Innovation• License to Operate• Customer Loyalty• Employees Loyalty• Risk Profile
• Reputation• Brand Value• Compliance
Main intangible valuedrivers influenced bystrategic stakeholdermanagement
Bo
ok
Va
lue
Ma
rke
tV
alu
e
Streiff - 2019
Importance of intangible valuesAnalysis of the S&P 500 Market Value-Index 1975 - 2015
Source: Standard and Poor’s, BHP
10
Peak might beachieved!
Streiff - 2019
Background: Link between intangible values andshareholder value - the DJSI*-Model (1)
Socia
l,cultura
l,ecolo
gic
ala
nd
econom
icchalle
nges
Intangible Values
FCFF: Free Cash Flow to the FirmWACC: Weighted Average Costs of Capital
ShareholderValue
= Sustainability Criterion
11
Source: Adapted from SAM Sustainability Yearbook 2008 *DJSI = Dow Jones Sustainability Index
Streiff - 2019
ROIC = Return on Invested Capital
Example showing on how human capital development couldpositively impact FCFF
12
Background: Link between intangible values andshareholder value - the DJSI*-Model (2)
Source: SAM Sustainability Yearbook 2009
Streiff - 2019
Intangible values and shareholder value:growing relevance of non-financial reporting
13
The N100 refers to a worldwide sample of 4,900 companiescomprising the top 100 companies by revenue in each of the 49countries researched in this study. These N100 statisticsprovide a broad-based snapshot of CR reporting among bothlarge and mid-cap firms around the world.
The G250 refers to the world’s 250 largest companies byrevenue based on the Fortune 500 ranking of 2016. Largeglobal companies are typically leaders in CR reporting and theirbehaviour often predicts trends that are subsequently adoptedmore widely.
Source: KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017
Streiff - 2019
Intangible values and shareholder value: growingrelevance of non-financial (CR) reporting
14
CR = Corporate Responsibility
Base: 4,900 N100 companiesThe N100 refers to a worldwide sample of 4,900 companies comprising the top 100 companies by revenue in eachof the 49 countries researched in this study. These N100 statistics provide a broad-based snapshot of CR reportingamong both large and mid-cap firms around the world.
Source: KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017
Streiff - 2019
Intangible values and shareholder value:growing relevance of non-financial reporting
15
Base: 4,900 N100 companiesThe N100 refers to a worldwide sample of 4,900 companies comprising the top 100 companies by revenue in eachof the 49 countries researched in this study. These N100 statistics provide a broad-based snapshot of CR reportingamong both large and mid-cap firms around the world.
Source: KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017
Streiff - 2019 16
The cases:
1. Barry Callebaut
2. Novo Nordisk
Streiff - 2019
Case 1:Barry Callebaut’s approach to improve social welfare
17
2019 Barry Callebaut and Cameroon signed a letter ofintent for the development of a model for sustainablecocoa farming and income diversification initiatives aswell as improve cocoa volumes through sharingproductivity best practices Link
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Short profile (2017/18) [1/2]
18
• core business: production of chocolate and cocoa products -
from sourcing and processing cocoa beans to producing the
chocolates, including chocolate fillings, decorations and
compounds
• 12,000 employees operating out of 40 countries
• 62 production facilities
• annual sales: CHF 7.3 billion
• net profit: CHF 368 million
Source: Barry Callebaut, Annual Report 2017/18; Website
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Value chain
19
Source: Barry Callebaut, Annual Report 2017/18
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Short profile [2/2]
20
In 2017/18, Barry Callebaut processed around 925,000 tonnes or approximately 20% of theworld crop
Source: Barry Callebaut, Roadshow 2018
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Vision & strategy
21
Source: Barry Callebaut, Annual Report 2017/18
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Material topics
22
Link
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Challenges related to cocoa
production
Aging farms
• Low productivity/yields
• Declining quality
• Low income
• Lack of access to inputs,improved seedlings, latesttechniques
Land
• Vanishing rainforest
• Soil depletion, erosion
• Climate change
• Ownership titles & rights
• Sharecropper arrangements
Aging farmers
• Switch to easier, moreprofitable crops
• High labor costs
• Lack of access to financing
• No savings culture
• Young people don‘t seefarming as viable
Infrastructure and welfare
• Poor roads
• Lack of transportation
• Shortage of schools & teachers
• Shortage of health careservices and providers
• Illiteracy
• Widespread poverty
23
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: The commitment
We have committed to four bold targets that we expect to
achieve by 2025 and that address the biggest sustainability
challenges in the chocolate supply chain.
By 2025:
•We will lift more than 500,000 cocoa farmers out of
poverty
•We will eradicate child labour from our supply chain
•We will become carbon and forest positive
•We will have 100% sustainable ingredients in all of our
products
24
Link
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Forever Chocolate – making
sustainable chocolate the norm by 2025!
25
Link
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Prospering Farmers
Goal:By 2025 we will lift more than 500,000 cocoa farmers out ofpoverty.
Achievements 2017/18 (excerpt)
• 169,460 = Baseline measurement of the number of
cocoa farmers in the supply chain out of poverty,
measured against the World Bank's USD 1.90/day
threshold for extreme poverty
• In 2017/18 premiums from the purchase of HORIZONS
products generated CHF 10.5 million and the program
reached more than 70,000 farmers. Farmers
participating in Cocoa Horizons have access to coaching,
access to a Farmer Business Plan, are supported to
access financial services and farm services, and are
supported on income diversification activities and
women empowerment.
26
Link
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Prospering Farmers - Measures
Improving access to education
27
Farmer field schools Business trainings
Streiff - 2019
Barry Callebaut: Transparency and partners
Criteria addressed to improve social welfare?
C1: Realistic assessment of the nature of economiccompetition
C3: Accounting for negative externalities
C4: Corporate objectives focus directly on well-being ofstakeholders
28
Streiff - 2019
Case 2:
Novo Nordisk – changing the business rational
29
Source: Novo Nordisk Link
Streiff - 2019
Novo Nordisk: Short profile (2018)
• core business: diabetes and hemophilia care, growth
hormone therapy and hormone replacement therapy
(obesity). Markets in >180 countries
• Employees:
43,200 in 80 countries
• Sales:
CHF 16.8 billion
• Net result:
CHF 5.8 billion
30
Source: Novo Nordisk, Annual Report 2018 (since 2004 integrated)
Streiff - 2019
Novo Nordisk: Short profile (2018)
31
Source: Novo Nordisk, Annual Report 2018 (since 2004 integrated)
Streiff - 2019
Novo Nordisk pursues a holistic strategy that goes
beyond business as usual
InnovativeProducts
Access toEducation
Access to Health
Patient Advocacy
DiseaseAwareness
Patient value proposition
Serviceandsupport
Treatment
Illustrative
Community
“… it is my aspiration that health willfinally be seen not as a blessing to
be wished for; but as a human rightto be fought for.”
- Kofi Annan, former secretary general of theUnited Nations
The business of healthrequires a patient centred approach
32
Source: Novo Nordisk, Presentation 2013
Streiff - 2019
Novo Nordisk: Project definition
How to generate profitable, sustainable and scalablesolutions to provide diabetes treatment to the low incomepeople who have limited access to care?
33
Source: Novo Nordisk, Presentation 2013
Streiff - 2019
Novo Nordisk: Changing Diabetes in Children
34
Source: Novo Nordisk Link
Streiff - 2019
Description
Environment
Mainhypothesistested
Kenya Nigeria India, Bihar
Making insulin available inmore locations and usingFaith Based organisationfor distribution and CBOfor patient awareness andeducation.
Making insulin available atthe point of prescriptionwill improve diabetes care
Making insulin available atdoorstep and motivationfrom community workerscan improve diabetes care
Patients will find insulin at afixed and low price in theirlocal community healthcentres where they willreceive professionaldiabetes care advice
Patients in hospital willfind personalised care andinsulin . A diabetes carekiosk will be established inthe public hospitals withadequately trained staff
Patients will find insulin infulfilment centres and withcommunity workers, healtheducators or peers bringinginsulin and education atdoor-step
SLUM URBAN RURAL
Private and publicpartnership
Institutionalcollaboration
Social entrepreneurs& rural insulin hubs
Novo Nordisk: Proof of the concept
partnershipmodels
35
Source: Novo Nordisk, Presentation 2013
Streiff - 2019
Novo Nordisk: Partners
Base-of-Pyramid Partners - example of Kenya
•Kenyan Ministry of Health
•Phillips Pharmaceuticals Ltd
•Local county governments
•Mission for Essential Drugs and Supplies (MEDS)
•Kenya Conference of Catholic Bishops (KCCB)
•Christian Health Association Kenya (CHAK)
•Kenya Defeat Diabetes Association (KDDA)
36
Novo Nordisk, Base of the Pyramid Report Link
Link to Video
Streiff - 2019
Novo Nordisk: Living-up patient centricity
From customer driven relationship…
... to cluster development … ... for patient centricity
37
Source: Novo Nordisk, Presentation 2013
Streiff - 2019
Novo Nordisk: Enhancing value for society and
the company
Integration
Scale
Expanding thepie
• Captureopportunitiesthat create
value for bothsociety and
Novo Nordisk
Zero sum game
• Re-allocateresources tocontribute to
society
Business basics
• Embedded part of how NovoNordisk does business
The right thing to do
• Adhere to requirements
• Getting engaged
Philanthropy
• Passive approach to contribute toissues important to society
Value creationpotential
Shared value to NovoNordisk and Society
• Shaping society
• Scale
38
Source: Novo Nordisk, Presentation 2013
Streiff - 2019
Novo Nordisk - A pioneer?
Criteria addressed to improve social welfare?
C1: Realistic assessment of the nature of economic competition
C2: Trusting firm-stakeholder relationships
C3: Accounting for negative externalities
C4: Corporate objectives focus directly on well-being ofstakeholders
Stakeholder management key principles considered
P1: Novo Nordisk is managed for the benefit of its stakeholders
P2: Novo Nordisk acts in the interests of the stakeholders astheir agent and it acts in the interests of the corporation toensure the survival of the firm
39
Streiff - 2019
Conclusions
40
Streiff - 2019
Stakeholder management is not an academic bubble,
it is a driver for sustainable business success
at a strategic level• Strong leadership - of all parties involved!• To be considered as a long-term investment allocating
sufficient and appropriate resources• Clear focus, joint goals and measurable outcomes and
impacts
at a normative level• Jointly defined the “rules of the game” and responsibilities
at a operational level• Professional process management and “neutral” moderation• Documentation and transparency
It is successful if following requirements are met
41