social health insurance policy direction aids law project 10 february 2004
TRANSCRIPT
SOCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY
DIRECTIONAIDS LAW PROJECTAIDS LAW PROJECT
10 February 200410 February 2004
Presentation
Brief contextBrief context Taylor Committee proposalsTaylor Committee proposals Departmental positionDepartmental position SHI DescriptionSHI Description Work planWork plan
Policy Context cont.
SA - Health System 2002/2003SA - Health System 2002/2003
Public sector
R33.2 billion
Private sector
R43 billion
Serves 6.9 m
Pcap = R6231.88
R519.32 pmpb
Serves 37.9 m
Pcap = R875.98
R72.99 pm pp
Policy Context
Public sectorPublic sector Private sectorPrivate sectorCoverCover Indigent (pop. growth)Indigent (pop. growth)
Low-income (pop. growth)Low-income (pop. growth)
High income (no change)High income (no change)Good risks (no change)Good risks (no change)Poor risks (decrease)Poor risks (decrease)
Burden of Burden of diseasedisease
HIV/AIDSHIV/AIDSInfectious Infectious CommunicableCommunicableChronicChronic
HIV/AIDS (limit cover)HIV/AIDS (limit cover)Infectious (na)Infectious (na)Communicable (na)Communicable (na)Chronic (reduce cover)Chronic (reduce cover)
ProvidersProviders MedicalMedical
NursingNursing
PharmacyPharmacy
Key Strategic Challenges Inequity in access to health careInequity in access to health care
Ensuring that public health system remains backbone of Ensuring that public health system remains backbone of SA health system care SA health system care
Address systematic cost increases Address systematic cost increases
Develop low-cost market – address high private hospital Develop low-cost market – address high private hospital costscosts
Reduce financial risk to individuals at the time of accessing Reduce financial risk to individuals at the time of accessing health carehealth care
Concept of social security
Three basic pillarsThree basic pillars Pillar 1: Pillar 1:
basic social endowment for all citizens basic social endowment for all citizens Pillar 2: Pillar 2:
contributions from those able to contribute over and contributions from those able to contribute over and above pillar 1above pillar 1
Pillar 3: Pillar 3: social security-type benefits that are more discretionary social security-type benefits that are more discretionary
in naturein nature
Health interventions
Pillar 1Pillar 1 Free health care for children <6Free health care for children <6 Free health care for pregnant womenFree health care for pregnant women Free primary health care servicesFree primary health care services Free health care for disabledFree health care for disabled
Pillar 2: Pillar 2: Social health insuranceSocial health insurance
Pillar 3: Pillar 3: Voluntary medical schemesVoluntary medical schemes
Characteristics Of NHI and SHI
Mandatory contributions for entire population or certain groups Mandatory contributions for entire population or certain groups like (public sector employees)like (public sector employees)
Usually employment related, payroll deductionsUsually employment related, payroll deductions
Contributions from employers and employeesContributions from employers and employees
Premiums are income related and benefits are standardizedPremiums are income related and benefits are standardized
Creates large risk pool and avoids adverse selectionCreates large risk pool and avoids adverse selection
Cross subsidization (healthy and the sick, wealthy and poorCross subsidization (healthy and the sick, wealthy and poor
NHI versus SHI
National health insuranceNational health insurance Benefits for contributors and non-contributorsBenefits for contributors and non-contributors Cross subsidies, dedicated health taxCross subsidies, dedicated health tax
Social Health InsuranceSocial Health Insurance Benefits contributors onlyBenefits contributors only Can increase resources available for public Can increase resources available for public
heath careheath care
Key departmental objectives Strengthen public health care system by Strengthen public health care system by
increasing revenueincreasing revenue Obtain prepaid contributions from those who Obtain prepaid contributions from those who
can paycan pay Reduce inequities in health care financingReduce inequities in health care financing Improve access of lower income groups to Improve access of lower income groups to
quality health carequality health care
Taylor Committee proposals
Four key policy proposals:Four key policy proposals: Move towards NHIMove towards NHI State medical insurance, risk equalisation, State medical insurance, risk equalisation,
social health insurancesocial health insurance Tax subsidy reform, cross subsidisationTax subsidy reform, cross subsidisation Recentralisation of health budgetRecentralisation of health budget
Departmental position
We still require significant tax funding for We still require significant tax funding for public health sectorpublic health sector
Need to compare progressivity of tax Need to compare progressivity of tax funding versus NHIfunding versus NHI
For the medium term,will only commit to For the medium term,will only commit to SHI SHI
State medical insurance
Taylor Committee proposals:Taylor Committee proposals: State-sponsored medical schemeState-sponsored medical scheme
Low cost for low income earnersLow cost for low income earners Sets benchmark price for minimum benefitsSets benchmark price for minimum benefits Benefits in differentiated amenities in public hospitals Benefits in differentiated amenities in public hospitals
plus private primary careplus private primary care
State medical insurance
Taylor Committee proposalsTaylor Committee proposals Civil service medical scheme coverCivil service medical scheme cover
Dedicated low cost restricted scheme Dedicated low cost restricted scheme Compulsory under employer mandateCompulsory under employer mandate Benefits similar to state-sponsored schemeBenefits similar to state-sponsored scheme Could evolve into state-sponsored schemeCould evolve into state-sponsored scheme
State medical insurance
Taylor Committee proposalsTaylor Committee proposals Risk equalisationRisk equalisation
Below average risk schemes contribute Below average risk schemes contribute above average risk schemes receiveabove average risk schemes receive
Enlarges risk pool, schemes compete on Enlarges risk pool, schemes compete on cost and quality rather than risk selectioncost and quality rather than risk selection
Aims to stabilise medical scheme marketAims to stabilise medical scheme market
Mandatory medical scheme cover
Taylor Committee proposalsTaylor Committee proposals Mandate to begin with high income Mandate to begin with high income
earners /qualifying employersearners /qualifying employers Voluntary membership for othersVoluntary membership for others Out of pocket fees for public hospital Out of pocket fees for public hospital
treatment in basic amenities abolishedtreatment in basic amenities abolished Low income mandates after high income Low income mandates after high income
mandatemandate
Department response
Endorse general approachEndorse general approach One state scheme, should evolve from civil One state scheme, should evolve from civil
service schemeservice scheme Support SHI, not ready to commit to NHISupport SHI, not ready to commit to NHI Accept abolition of out of pocket fees, Accept abolition of out of pocket fees,
except possibly bypass feesexcept possibly bypass fees
Departmental response
We endorse:We endorse: SHI plus tax funding SHI plus tax funding Incremental mandates for medical scheme Incremental mandates for medical scheme
membershipmembership Civil service medical scheme as starting Civil service medical scheme as starting
pointpoint Civil service scheme to evolve to state-Civil service scheme to evolve to state-
sponsored schemesponsored scheme
Departmental response
Basic minimum floor of benefits should be Basic minimum floor of benefits should be establishedestablished
Mandatory benefits = Prescribed minimum Mandatory benefits = Prescribed minimum benefits plus primary health care servicesbenefits plus primary health care services
SHI in SA context
Government mandated health insuranceGovernment mandated health insurance Income cross-subsidies among contributorsIncome cross-subsidies among contributors Risk-related cross-subsidies among Risk-related cross-subsidies among
contributorscontributors
Risk Related Cross subsidies
MSA requires all schemes to provide PMB for all MSA requires all schemes to provide PMB for all scheme membersscheme members
Scheme have different risk profiles, resulting in Scheme have different risk profiles, resulting in different cost structuresdifferent cost structures
Research done by CARE found that price of PMB in Research done by CARE found that price of PMB in one scheme was 17% cheaper while for another one scheme was 17% cheaper while for another scheme 130% more expensive than industry scheme 130% more expensive than industry average, just because of different age profilesaverage, just because of different age profiles
Clearly, schemes have incentive to risk rate in order Clearly, schemes have incentive to risk rate in order to reduce their coststo reduce their costs
Risk Related Cross subsidies
Risk equalisation should ensure that all medical Risk equalisation should ensure that all medical scheme members face the same community price for scheme members face the same community price for PMB’sPMB’s
It should:It should: remove the incentives for remove the incentives for medical schemesmedical schemes to select to select
preferred risks, by ensuring that eachpreferred risks, by ensuring that each scheme scheme must must bear the cost of a risk profile equal to the risk bear the cost of a risk profile equal to the risk profile of all profile of all coveredcovered lives. lives.
Create incentives for schemes to improve its Create incentives for schemes to improve its efficiencies and cost controls, by not incorrectly efficiencies and cost controls, by not incorrectly penalising efficient schemes.penalising efficient schemes.
Income Cross subsidies
In most countries with social insurance systems, In most countries with social insurance systems, contributions tend to be based on income contributions tend to be based on income
High income earners cross-subsidise low income High income earners cross-subsidise low income earnersearners
In SA, medical scheme contributions are In SA, medical scheme contributions are community rated community rated
Income related cross subsidies difficult to achieveIncome related cross subsidies difficult to achieve Need to change tax subsidy to improve income Need to change tax subsidy to improve income
cross subsidiescross subsidies
Income Cross subsidies
Tax deductions on medical scheme contributions, Tax deductions on medical scheme contributions, and the tax deductions on medical expenses in and the tax deductions on medical expenses in excess of 5% of income estimated at R7,8 billionexcess of 5% of income estimated at R7,8 billion
Impact is regressive b/c of link to contributionsImpact is regressive b/c of link to contributionsOut of pocket expenditure may be more progressive, Out of pocket expenditure may be more progressive,
but depends on submission of tax returnsbut depends on submission of tax returnsNeed to restructure this subsidy to achieve greater Need to restructure this subsidy to achieve greater
subsidies for lower-income earnerssubsidies for lower-income earners
Income and risk-related cross subsidies Support restructuring of tax subsidy, but Support restructuring of tax subsidy, but
with greater subsidies for lower-income with greater subsidies for lower-income earnersearners
Support risk equalization to stabilize Support risk equalization to stabilize medical scheme environment and prevent medical scheme environment and prevent schemes from profiting via risk selectionschemes from profiting via risk selection
Budget Centralisation
Budget centralisation to follow a political Budget centralisation to follow a political processprocess
Will enlist Treasury support for Will enlist Treasury support for implementation of revenue retention implementation of revenue retention framework in all provincesframework in all provinces
Supporting policies
Preparation of public hospitalsPreparation of public hospitals Hospital revitalisation projectHospital revitalisation project Designated provider network pilotDesignated provider network pilot Civil service scheme developmentCivil service scheme development
Revenue retention policy developmentRevenue retention policy development
Programme of work 2004
Sign DSPN contracts with medical schemes 1 Sign DSPN contracts with medical schemes 1 April 2004April 2004
Finalise technical work on Risk Equalization and Finalise technical work on Risk Equalization and income cross subsidy issuesincome cross subsidy issues
Support DPSA process to implement civil service Support DPSA process to implement civil service medical scheme medical scheme
Obtain Treasury support for revenue retention Obtain Treasury support for revenue retention enforcementenforcement
Finalise policy decision on phasing of mandatory Finalise policy decision on phasing of mandatory covercover