six mistakes i have made - learnings from leadership engagements
TRANSCRIPT
Six Mistakes I Have Made
Learnings from leadership engagements
30-Mar-2015
Erik Korsvik Østergaard, Partner, Bloch&Østergaard I/S
Because going to work should be nice, great, and awesome
2
Learn from my mistakes
This slide deck covers some of the many mistakes I have made when working with leadership in general, and with UNBOSS in particular.
Mistakes contain opportunities for feedback, and I try to grasp everyone of them with that in mind.
Sometimes you win; sometimes you learn.
© Erik Korsvik Østergaard 2015, but please distribute and reuseAll pictures are from Unsplash
Too much
Sometimes you get eager and engage in too many activities and elements at the same time.
Maybe the situation really does call both for the introduction of purpose, for focus on empowerment, as well as for situational leadership – but in some cases it’s simply way too much for the organisation to comprehend and grasp at
once.
You are performing organisational changes. You are dealing with years and years of habitsand culture. Changes take time, and if you change too much too fast, the organisation will drown in it, and it will backfire.
You need to introduce the elements one by one, giving the employees and
organisation time to change those habits one by one.
Try to find the one or two elements, that are most requested or needed, or gives the best effect.
After seeing the effect, inspect and apply the next element.
Too impatient
Mistake no. 2Giving up too soon, not allowing the organisation to let it sink in
and actually benefit from it
Too impatient
You got the bright idea.
You got the support from management to engage.
And you have launched your leadership programme, just as you designed it
… But the effect is missing or only slowly showing in a few places.
It’s easy to be impatient, disappointed and frustrated.
You made a commitment to the management group,
and now the blame-game and explanations start.
Either you or the management group thinks about cancelling the project in order to minimise the lost investment or to avoid to lose face.
Maybe you are right – or maybe you did initiate the wrong things, and it is time to adjust approach.
Or, maybe it’s just because changes take time.
Revisit the business case
and the reasoning for engagement, and reassure yourself (and the management group) that you’re doing the right thing.
Perform some employee interviews to see how the initiatives are received. Use the feedback as input for communication, mentoring and re-training.
Leadership programmes take between 3 and 24 months to create effect.
Be patient.
Too rigid
Mistake no. 3Assuming that one size fits all, and
that your ideas are perfect and cannot benefit from adjustment
Too rigid
You designed it – so naturally it is perfect(!)
Now you can actually make two mistakes in one:
A: Not understanding that each employee needs adapted, situational leadership, based on the approach that you designed
B: Not being open to general adjustments and development to the leadership programme
Regarding A: The seasoned leader understands and masters the skill of adapting leadership style to the colleague, he/she is working with.
You’ll be making a mistake, if you’re too rigid and cannot tailor the model for the sake of your colleague. Situational leadership is the key here.
Regarding B: You must be
open to general input and adjustments to the leadership programme and approach. You should invite to feedback sessions on regularly basis, while the organisation is embracing it.
Inspect and adapt.
Don’t be rigid.
Too fluffy
Talking about the reason for change, about the business case, and about the desired future state is a naturally first step in a transformation process, but often it seems quite fluffy because you actually don’t really know
how it will work in daily life.
However, you’ll be making a mistake if you keep being fluffy and avoid the more detailed translation into daily life, and your organisation looses faith in the
why.
Maybe you actually don’t know how it looks in daily life, but then involve the employees and co-create it.
The translation is the second step.
Too local
So, you are developing your team, department or business unit. You engage and train them, and you start to see the effect: Changed behaviour, new kind of transparency, new ways of working, and so.
Slowly your peers and your manager starts noticing the development, and they
start questioning you, your approach, and your motives. Your management and your peers may even loose trust in you, an then your project soon will be dead.
Involve and train your peers and your manager, so they are informed and aware of your actions – and your
motives.
You want them to be curious and supportive, not impediments. Remember to share your thoughts, results, and learnings with them.
Manage upwards too.
Don’t be too local.
Too literal *)
Mistake no. 6Taking UNBOSS to literal,
actually non-bossing instead
*) specifically for UNBOSS
Too literal
This mistake applies specifically to UNBOSS.
UNBOSS is about avoiding to be the old fashioned, tough boss with all the answers and all the power.UNBOSS is about purpose, involvement, and empowerment. About rallying for a cause and giving the
employees the mandate, letting them make decisions.You’ll make a mistake if you take it too literal and disclaim the accountability too, acting as if there is no boss, leaving it all up to the employees.You are still the boss. You just do it in a modern, people-friendly way.
If you take it too literal, you will feel it within a few weeks. The shared purpose and direction starts to fade. The joint collaboration erodes. The employees start to get anxious about whether they perform well enough.Be the boss. Be accountable, but be people-friendly.Don’t be too literal.
Bloch&Østergaard I/S
Because going to work should be nice, great, and awesome
17
Erik Korsvik Østergaard, Partner, Bloch&Østergaard I/S
@ErikQstergaard