sia environment

8/6/2019 SIA Environment

1/12

DEPARTMENT OF TOWN AND REGIONAL PLANNING

FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND SURVEYING

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

PERAK CAMPUS ISO 9001 : 2000 No. Sijil KLR 0404089

Diploma Town And Regional Planning 06B

Session December 2009 April 2010

Department Of Town And Regional Planning

Faculty Of Architecture, Planning And Surveying

Universiti Teknologi Mara, Perak

Prepared For :

MDM. KAMARIAH BT ABDULLAH

Prepared By :

SITI ATHIRAH BT ISHAK 2007202466

ADILAH BT SAIFUL BAHARI 2007202432

HAIZURA BT HAMZAH 2007202524

NUR FARRAH AINI BT MAZLAN 2007202522

NURUL ZALIKHA BT ABD RAHMAN 2007229594

NURAINI FARHANA BT ALIAS 2007202446


2/12




PERAK CAMPUS

INTRODUCTION

A process to identify, predict, evaluate and communicate information about

impacts of a proposed project, policy programmed or plan on a community and their

activities and to detail mitigation measures prior to approval and implementation.

In other definition, it refer to a systematic process that attempts to determine impactson the day-to-day quality of life of people whose environment is affected by physical

development or policy change.

SIA begin with a description of the current situation and proceed to outline the likely

future situation in order to estimate the impacts once the project or policy is

operational.

The result of the SIA are used in monitoring, to measure the actual versus the

predicted social impacts and to manage change.


3/12




PERAK CAMPUS

FACTOR ELABORATION

Demographic Number of people, location, population density, age etc.

Socio-economic Determinants

Factors affecting income and productivity, such as risk aversion

of the poorest groups, land tenure, access to productive inputsand markets, family composition, kinship reciprocity, and access

to labour opportunities and migration.

Social Organization

Organization and capacity at the household and community

levels affecting participation in local level institutions as well as

access to services and information.

Socio-political Context

Implementing agencies development goals, priorities,

commitment, to project objectives, control over resources,

experience, experience, and relationship with other stakeholder

groups.

Needs AndValues

Stakeholder attitudes and values determining whether

development interventions are needed and wanted, appropriate

incentives for change and capacity of stakeholders to manage

the process of change.

FACTORS THAT CAUSING THE PHENOMENA OF THE ISSUES


4/12




PERAK CAMPUS

EFFECTS TO THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND QUALITY OF HUMAN LIFE

INDICATIVEHEALTH ANDSOCIAL WELL-BEING IMPACT

Death of selfor a familymembers-

personal lost Death in thecommunity-

loss of humanand social

capital

Nutrition-adequacy,

security andquality of

individual andhousehold food

supply

Actual healthand fertility -

(ability toconceive) of

family membersPerceive

health andfertility

Mental health andsubjective well- being-

feelings of stress, anxiety,apathy, depression,

nostalgic, melancholy,changed self image,general self esteem

(psycho-social factors)

Changedaspirations forthe future for

self andchildren

Autonomy-changes in an

individualsindependence

or self-reliance

A) INDICATIVE HEALTH AND

SOCIAL WELL-BEING IMPACT


5/12




PERAK CAMPUS

B) INDICATIVE QUALITY OF

THE LIVING ENVIRONMENT

(LIVEABILITY) IMPACT

INDICATIVEQUALITY OFTHE LIVING

ENVIRONMENT(LIVEABILITY)

IMPACT

Perceived quality of the livingenvironment (i.e. work and homeenvironment or neighborhood)-

in terms of exposure to dust, noise,risk, odour, vibration, blasting,

artificial light, safety, crowding,presence of strangers, commuting

time etcActual quality of

the livingenvironment

Disruption todaily living

practices (whichmay or may not

causeannoyance)

Aestheticquality- visual

impacts, outlook,vistas, shadowing

etc

Adequacy of socialinfrastructure-changes in the

demands for supplyof basic socialservices, etc

Perception ofpersonal safety

and fear ofcrime

Actual personalsafety and

hazard exposure

Actual crimeand violence


6/12




PERAK CAMPUS

C) INDICATIVE ECONOMICS

IMPACTS AND MATERIAL

WELL-BEING IMPACT

INDICATIVEECONOMICS

IMPACTSAND

MATERIALWELL-BEING

IMPACTS

Workload-amount of work

necessary inorder to survive

and/or livereasonably

Standard of living,levels of affluence- a

composite measure ofmaterial well-being

referring to how well offa households or

individual is in terms oftheir ability to obtain

goods and services. It isalso related to the cost ofliving, and is affected by

changes in local pricesetc

Economic prosperityand resilience- the levelof economic affluence of

a community and theextent of diversity of

economic opportunities

Replacement costs of

environmentalfunctions- the cost ofreplacing a product or

service that wasformerly provided by

the environment, suchas clean water,firewood, floodprotection, etc


7/12




PERAK CAMPUS

D) INDICATIVE CULTURAL

IMPATCS

INDICATIVECULTURALIMPACTS

Change in culturalvalues - such as

moral rules,beliefs, ritual

system, language,and dress experience of being

culturally marginalized-the structural exclusion

of certain groupsbecause of their cultural

characteristics, thuscreating a feeling ofbeing a second class

citizen

Profanisation of culture-the commercialexploitation or

commoditization of culturalheritage (such as traditional

handicrafts, artifacts) andthe associated loss of

meaning

Loss oflocal

language ordialect

Loss of natural andcultural

eritage-

damage to ordestruction of cultural,

historical, archeologicalor natural resources,

including burialgrounds, historic sites,and places of religious,cultural and aesthetic

value


8/12




PERAK CAMPUS

HOW TO MINIMIZE & CONTROL THE ISSUES

HOW TOMINIMIZE &CONTROLTHE ISSUES

Develop publicinvolvementprogramme Describe

proposedaction and

alternatives

Describe relevantuman

environment andzones ofinfluence

Identify

probableimpacts

(scoping)

InvestigateprobableimpactsDetermine

probableresponse

Estimatesecondary

andcumulative

impacts

Recommend

c anges oralternatives

Mitigation,remediation and

en ancement plan

Develop andimplementmonitoringprogramme


9/12




PERAK CAMPUS

INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT AGREEMENTS

ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze PollutionAgreed Measures for the Conservation of Antartic Flora and Fauna

Basel ConventionCarpathian Convention Framework Convention on the Protection and Sustainable

Development of the Carpathians

Convention on Biological DiversityConvention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution

EMEP Protocol

Nitrogen Oxide ProtocolVolatile Organic Compounds Protocol

Sulphur Emission Reduction Protocols 1985 and 1994

Heavy Metals ProtocolPOP Air Pollution ProtocolMulti-effect Protocol (Gothenburg Protocol)


10/12


FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND SURVEYINGUNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

PERAK CAMPUS

Convention on the conservation of European Wildlife and Natural HabitatConvention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and FaunaConvention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping Wastes and Other

MatterConvention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental

Modification TechniqueInternational Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeWestern Regional Climate Action Initiative


11/12



PERAK CAMPUS

CONCLUSION

Conclusively, social impact assessment is predicted on the notion thatdecision-makers should understand the consequences of their decisions before they act

and that the people affected will not only be appraised of the effects but have theopportunity to participate in designing their future. The social environment is differentthan their future. The social environment is different than the natural environmentbecause it reacts in anticipation of change but it can adapt in reasoned ways to

changing circumstance in part of the planning process.

In addition, persons in different social settings understand change in differentways and react in different ways. Perhaps because of this complexity, or the politicalconsequences of making overt the social consequences of projects and programs, social

impact assessment has not been well-integrated into agency decision making. If awell-prepared SIA is integrated into the decision-making process, better decisions willresult.


12/12



PERAK CAMPUS

REFERENCES

Asmah, Ahmad, etc. Social Impact Assessment In Malaysia, Malaysian Association ofSocial Impact Assessment (MSIA).

www.wikipedia.com/social impact assessment

sia environment

Documents