senate state affairs - strategic partnerships, inc. 10-20-06/stateaffairs_10_18_061.pdf · 13.77%...
TRANSCRIPT
Senate State Affairs
October 18, 2006
Ann S. FuelbergExecutive Director
Employees Retirement System of Texas
ERS Background Info
Established by Constitutional Amendmentpassed in 1945, began operations in 1947
In 60 years of ERS operations, $11.3billion paid in retirement benefits
$8 billion paid in retirement benefitsbetween 1995-2005
3
ERS Trust Fund RevenueFiscal Year 2006
*Investment Income72.95%
Member Contributions 13.77%
State Contributions 13.28%
Member’s Contribution is greater because State does not match 6.45% when members purchase prior refunded service or additional service credit
*Investment income is net investment expenses
4
Current contribution rate 12.45%
Normal Cost (Percent of payroll) 12. 28%Actuarial Value of Assets $20.8 billionActuarial Accrued Liability $21.9 billion Net Liability Balance ($1.1 billion)Funded Ratio 94.8%Amortization Period InfiniteAnnual Required Contribution 13.59%
ERS Funded Status(All full-time/part-time state agency employees &
elected state officials)
Based on August 31, 2005 Actuarial Valuation
5
Public Pension Funding LevelsBy Plan Size
(117 plans)
Aggregate: 86.0%
Median: 85.5%
NASRA Public Fund Survey
40%
60%
80%
100%
24%
111%
LECOS
ERS
6
When Is Funded Ratio Too Low?With 94.8% funded ratio, ERS is financially solid
The funded ratio is a long-term calculation --movement around the 100% number is normal
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 requires private sector pension plans to improve when they fall below 80% funded
Funded ratio can drop below 100% and the fund remain actuarially sound
Sources: Ian Rudge (2006); H.R. 4, PPA 2006
7
History of ERS Funded Ratio1985- 2005
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
100.0%
102.0%
104.0%
106.0%
108.0%
110.0%
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
18.8 yrs
18.1 yrs
5.9 yrs 14.7 yrs
Infinite
Infinite
Infinite
Amortization Period Reflected Above for Periods when Funded Ratio Fell Below 100%
8
Type of Activity 2005 2004 2005 2004
Combined gain/(loss) from age and service retirements, disability retirements, death-in-service benefits, and withdrawal from employment (324.3) (166.2) (4.0) 0.5
Pay IncreasesIf there are smaller pay increases than assumed, there is a gain. If greater increases occur, a loss. (251.6) 400.9 (17.3) 15.5
Interest on Overfunded/(Unfunded) Actuarial Accrued LiabilityA gain/(loss) is recognized each year for the actual interest accumulated and credited to the overfunded/(unfunded) actuarial accrued liability at the beginning of the year. (44.4) (38.4) 4.6 5.5
Contribution IncomeIf contributions are received in excess of normal cost, there is a gain. If less, a loss. (21.4) (12.4) (20.7) (21.4)
Investment IncomeIf there is greater investment income than assumed, there is a gain. If less income, a loss. (98.6) (309.8) (3.3) (10.7)
Death After RetirementIf retirees live longer than assumed, there is a loss. If not as long, a gain. 120.9 76.2 3.3 (0.3)
OtherMiscellaneous gains and losses resulting from data adjustments, timing of financial transactions, valuation methods, etc. (30.4) (24.9) - -
Gain/(Loss) During Year from Financial Experience (649.8) (74.6) (37.4) (10.9)
Non-Recurring ItemsAdjustments for plan amendments, changes in actuarial assumptions, increase in Service Retirement Formula, etc. 70.8 - 0.5 -
Composite Gain/(Loss) During Year (in millions) (579.0) (74.6) (36.9) (10.9)
Assumed vs. Actual Experience - Impact on Actuarial Accrued Liabilities ERS LECOS
9
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000
FY90
FY91
FY92
FY93
FY94
FY95
FY96
FY97
FY98
FY99
FY00
FY01
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
fiscal year
num
ber o
f ret
iem
ploy
ees 7,000
8,000
red
Expected Service Retirements Actual Service Retirements
Expected vs. Actual Service RetirementsFY 1990 – FY 2005
.25% Multiplier Incentive (SB 81)
25% Salary Incentive (HB 3208)
10
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
FY89
FY90
FY91
FY92
FY93
FY94
FY95
FY96
FY97
FY98
FY99
FY00
FY01
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
Total Expected Payroll Growth Total Actual Payroll Growth
Expected vs. Actual Payroll Growth*FY 1989 – FY 2005
* Payroll growth = Percentage growth in number of active members plus thepercentage increase in average salaries
11
History of Contribution vs. Normal Cost and
Annually Required Contribution1985-2005
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Total Contribution Normal Cost ARC
12
-10%-5%0%5%
10%15%20%25%
FY89FY90FY91FY92FY93FY94FY95FY96FY97FY98FY99FY00FY01FY02FY03FY04FY05FY20
6
Assumed Rate of Return (ROR) Actual ROR on Actuarial ValueActual ROR on Market Value
ERS Investment ExperienceFY 1989 – FY 2006
13
$12.8
$14.2
$15.8
$17.4
$18.4
$18.9
$19.5
$20.0
$20.8
$14.8
$16.0
$18.3
$19.8
$18.1
$16.4
$17.5
$18.8
$20.4
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Year
Ass
et V
alue
($B
illio
ns)
AVMV
Actuarial Value & Market Value of AssetsFY 1997 – FY 2006
2006
$22.4
14
FY 2006 return 8.83%
Actual 10 year return 7.99%
Policy benchmark 10-yr return 7.89%
Actuarial assumption 8.00%
FY 2006 Investment Results
15
Created by the Legislature in 1979
Over the past 10 years...Active members have decreased 4.12%Retirees have increased 149.3%Monthly annuity payroll has increased 98%
Original funding source repealed in 1995
Without funding source, funded ratio isexpected to drop below 100% during thecurrent biennium
LECOSRF Background Info
16
Law Enforcement & Custodial Officer Supplemental Retirement Fund ~ LECOSRF
(Law enforcement officers commissioned by DPS, TABC, TBPC Capitol Area Security Force, TDP&W, custodial and parole officers employed by the TDCJ supervising and having direct
contact with inmates)direct contact with inmates)
Current Contribution Rate 0%
Normal Cost (Percent of Payroll) 1.62%
Actuarial Value of Assets $698.8 million
Actuarial Accrued Liability $677.9 million
Net Asset Balance $20.8 million
Funded Ratio 103.1%
Amortization Period 0.0
Based on August 31, 2005 Actuarial Valuation
17
Current Contribution Rate 16.83%
Normal Cost (Percent of Payroll) 20.98%
Actuarial Value of Assets $164,230,979
Actuarial Accrued Liability $182,311,161
Net Asset Balance ($21,625,727)
Funded Ratio 90.1%
Amortization Period 26.0
JRS II Funded Status(Judges, Justices, and Commissioners of the Texas Supreme Court, Court of Criminal
Appeals, Court of Appeals, and District Courts employed after August 31, 1985)
Based on August 31, 2005 Actuarial Valuation
18
ERS Trust Fund In SummaryFinancially solid and provides guaranteed lifetime annuity to State of Texas retireesAllows for annuity increases when UAAL can be amortized over 31 years
Six “13TH Checks” from 1993 to 2001Ad-hoc increasesCost-of-living increase based on Consumer Price Index for all retirees
Allowed ERS’ funded ratio to remain in national top third despite:
Major downturn in market in 2001 & 2002; andNormal Cost under-funded Retirement Incentives
Results in 72% of the Fund’s revenue coming from investment earnings
19
APPENDIX
20
Retirement Appropriation Request for 2008-2009
$660 million to continue currentcontribution rate
$117 million for ERS to receive ARCcontribution
$46 million for LECOSRF to receiveARC contribution
Total Retirement = $822.2 million
21
FINANCIAL DATAActuarial Value of Assets $20.8 billion $699 million $164 million 0
Current STATE Contribution Rate 6.45% N/C 16.83% None - "Pay As You Go" Plan
Current MEMBER Contribution Rate First 20 years 6.00% 0.00% 6.00% 6.00%After 20 Years 6.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Funded Ratio 94.80% 103.10% 90.10% JRS I is not a pre-funded retirement plan.
Normal Cost 12.28% 1.63% 20.98% N/AAnnually Required Contribution (ARC) 13.59% 1.7%* N/A N/A
MEMBER DATAActive Members 133,331 37,175 491 43
Inactive Members 57,079 12 88 16Average Salary $34,345 $31,848 $99,734
Average Entry Age 33-34 -- 45 --Average Age 43 40.8 53.5 --
RETIREE DATAAnnuitants 62,822 4,942 81 491
Average Service at Retirement 22.76 25.48 11.63 17.42Average Retiree Age 67 61 67 75
Average Monthly Annuity $1,574 $2,478 $4,421 $4,735Average Age @ Retirement 58 53 63 62
ERS LECOSRF JRS II JRS I
Current Status of ERS Retirement FundsAugust 31, 2005 Actuarial Valuation
*Based on current projection