ies master publication, · 2017. 11. 24. · alternative approach (mohr circle approach): if we use...

13

Upload: others

Post on 10-Nov-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 2: IES MASTER PUBLICATION, · 2017. 11. 24. · Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach): If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28°

UPSC Engineering Services Examination, GATE,

State Engineering Service Examination & Public Sector Examination.

(BHEL, NTPC, NHPC, DRDO, SAIL, HAL, BSNL, BPCL, NPCL, etc.)

C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N GESE CONVENTIONAL SOLUTION

PAPER–I

FROM (1995-2017)

Regd. office : Phone : F-126, (Lower Basement), Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi-110016 011-26522064Mobile : E-mail:

Web : 8010009955, 9711853908 [email protected], [email protected]

iesmasterpublications.com, iesmaster.org

Page 3: IES MASTER PUBLICATION, · 2017. 11. 24. · Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach): If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28°

Typeset at : IES Master Publication, New Delhi-110016

© No part of this booklet may be reproduced, or distributed in anyform or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, orotherwise or stored in a database or retrieval system without theprior permission of IES MASTER PUBLICATION, New Delhi.Violaters are liable to be legally prosecuted.

ISBN :

IES MASTER PublicationF-126, (Lower Basement), Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi-110016Phone : 011-26522064, Mobile : 8010009955, 9711853908E-mail : [email protected], [email protected] : iesmasterpublications.com, iesmaster.org

First Edition : 2017

Page 5: IES MASTER PUBLICATION, · 2017. 11. 24. · Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach): If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28°

Preface

It is an immense pleasure to present topic wise previous years solved paper ofEngineering Services Exam. This booklet has come out after long observation anddetailed interaction with the students preparing for Engineering Services Exam andincludes detailed explanation to all questions. The approach has been to provideexplanation in such a way that just by going through the solutions, students will beable to understand the basic concepts and will apply these concepts in solving otherquestions that might be asked in future exams.

Engineering Services Exam is a gateway to an immensly satisfying and high exposurejob in engineering sector. The exposure to challenges and opportunities of leading thediverse field of engineering has been the main reason for students opting for thisservice as compared to others. To facilitate selection into these services, availabilityof arithmetic solution to previous year paper is the need of the day. Towards this endthis book becomes indispensable.

Mr. Kanchan Kumar ThakurDirector–IES Master

Page 6: IES MASTER PUBLICATION, · 2017. 11. 24. · Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach): If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28°

CONTENTS

1. Strength of Material -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 – 197

2. Structure Analysis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 198 – 409

3. Steel Structure ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 410 – 527

4. RCC and Prestressed Concrete ------------------------------------------------------------ 528 – 659

5. PERT CPM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 600 – 731

6. Building Material --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 732 – 808

Page 8: IES MASTER PUBLICATION, · 2017. 11. 24. · Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach): If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28°

IES –1995

1. The principal stresses at a point in an elastic material are 1.5 (tensile), (tensile)and 0.5 (compressive). The elastic limit in tension is 210 MPa and = 0.3. What wouldbe the value of at failure when computed by the different theories of failure?

[15 Marks]

Sol. Given data :

1 1.5 ; 2 ; 3 = – 0.5 *

2 = +

1 = + (1.5 )

3 = (–0.5 )

(Macroscopic View of a Point)

Elastic limit in tension (fy) = 210 MPa.

= 0.3

Determine : at failure when computed by different theories of failure.

(1) Maximum Principle Stress Theory : As per this theory for no failure maximum principal Stressshould be less than yield stress under uniaxial loading.

So, 1 1.5 yf

1.5 yf yf1.5

210 140.001.5

140 MPa(2) Maximum principal strain theory : As per this theory, for no failure maximum principal strain

should be less than yield strain under uniaxial loading

i.e., max y

E

CHAPTER

Strength of Material

1Syllabus

Elastic constants, stress, plane stress. Mohr’s circle of stress, strains, plane strain, Mohr’scircle of stain, combined stress, Elastic theories of failure; Simple bending, shear; Torsion ofcircular and rectangular sections and simple members.

Page 9: IES MASTER PUBLICATION, · 2017. 11. 24. · Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach): If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28°

  2 | IES CONVENTIONAL SOLUTION PAPER-I 1995-2017

Among x y z x( , , ), will be maximum because 1 is maximum

x = 1.5 0.5 1.5 – 0.3 0.15 1.35–

E E E E E

1.35

E

210E

2101.35 155.55 MPa.

(3) Maximum shear stress theory : For no failure, maximum shear stress should be less thanor equal to maximum shear stress under uniaxial loading.

Since we have 3–D case,

Maximum shear stress = 1 3 2 31 2– ––maximum , ,

2 2 2

Maximum shear stress under uniaxial loading : y = yf2

From this theory

1 3 2 31 2– ––Maximum , ,

2 2 2

yf2

1 3–2

2102

1.5 – –0.5

2

105

2 210 105 MPa.

(4) Maximum strain energy theorem : For no failure, maximum strain energy absorbed at a pointshould be less than or equal to total strain energy per unit volume under uniaxial loading, whenmaterial is subjected to stress upto elastic limit.

Total strain energy = 2 2 21 2 3 1 2 2 3 3 1– 2

2E

Total strain energy per unit volume under uniaxial loading = 2

yf2E

According to this theory, 2 2 2 21 2 3 1 2 2 3 3 y– 2 f

2 2 21.5 –0.5 – 2 0.3 1.5 – 0.5 –1.5 0.5 2102

2 2210

3.35 114.73 MPa

(5) Maximum distortion energy theory :- For no failure, maximum shear strain energy in a bodyshould be less than maximum shear strain energy due to uniaxial loading.

2 2 21 2 2 3 3 1

1 – – –2 2

yf

2 2 21 1.5 – 0.5 –0.5 –1.52 2102

2 2 20.25 2.25 4 2 × 2102

2 22 210

6.5

22 210

6.5

116.487 MPa

Page 10: IES MASTER PUBLICATION, · 2017. 11. 24. · Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach): If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28°

STRENGTH OF MATERIAL  | 3

2. The strain measurements from a rectangular strain rosette were e0 = 600 × 10–6, e45 =500 × 10—6 and e90 = 200 × 10–6. Find the magnitude and direction of principal strains.If E = 2 × 105 N/mm2 and = 0.3 find the principal stresses.

[10 Marks ]

Sol.

90°45°

90 = 200 × 10–6

45 = 500 × 10–6

0 = 600 × 10–6

y

x

x

We know that x = x y x y xycos 2 sin 22 2 2

... (i)

and max min =2 2

x y x y xy

2 2 2

... (ii)

Thus to determine the principal strain, we need normal strain in two mutually perpendicular directionand shear strain (xy) associated with these directions.

From (i)

45 = xy0 90 0 90 cos (2 45 ) sin (2 45 )2 2 2

xy 0 90[ ]

500 × 10–6 = 6 6600 200 600 20010 10 cos902 2

+ xy

2 cos 90 0

sin 90 1

6xy 200 10

From (ii)

max min =22

xy0 90 0 902 2 2

=2

6 12 12600 200 600 200 20010 10 102 2 2

=2 2 6[400 (200) (100) ] 10

= 6[400 223.607] 10

max = 623.607 × 10–6 = major principal strain

min = 176.393 × 10–6 = minor principal strain

Page 11: IES MASTER PUBLICATION, · 2017. 11. 24. · Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach): If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28°

  4 | IES CONVENTIONAL SOLUTION PAPER-I 1995-2017

Also, we know that,

tan 2P = xy

x y

/ 2 200 200 1/ 2 600 200 400 2

P = 13.282° or 103.282°One of these angles will be associated with major principal strain and other with minor principal strain.To determine which of the angle is associated with major principal strain, let us put the value of P in straintransformation eq.

x =xy0 90 0 90

P Pcos 2 sin 22 2 2

= 6600 200 600 200 200cos 2 (13.282 ) sin 2 (13.482) 102 2 2

x = 623.607 × 10–6

P = 13.282° is associated with major principal straini.e., direction of major principal strain is at 13.282° in anticlockwise direction from 0 strain direction andhence direction of minor principal strain is at 103.282° in anticlockwise direction from 0 strain direction.

Calculation of principal stresses:

max min( )E E

= max

maxminE E

= min

max – 0.3 min = 623.607 ×10–6 × 2 × 105 N/mm2

max– 0.3 min = 124.72 N/mm2 ... (i)min – 0.3 max = 176.393 ×10–6 × 2× 105 N/mm2 ... (ii)

0.3 min – 0.09 max = 35.279 × 0.3 ... (iii)From (i) + (iii)

max(10.09) = 124.7 + 35.279 × 0.3

2max 148.685 N/mm

2min 79.885 N/mm

Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach):

If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28° and 103.28°corresponds to major principal strainBy analytical approach we have found that xy is (+)ve. This implies that it is associated with (+)ve shearstress as shown below.

y

x

Page 12: IES MASTER PUBLICATION, · 2017. 11. 24. · Alternative approach (Mohr circle approach): If we use Mohr transformation, we will not have to check which of the two angles 13.28°

STRENGTH OF MATERIAL  | 5

Hence strains are shown as

1

2

x

xy

xy

y

6xy 6

y200 10, i.e. 200 10 ,

2 2

xy

2

(176.393 × 10 , 0)–6

(400 × 10 , 0)–6 2P

(623.607 × 10 , 0)–3 direction of major principal

straindirection of

minor principal strain

xyx ,

2

66 200 10i.e, 600 10 ,

2

direction of x

direction of y

max = (400 × 10–6) + Rmin = (400 × 10–6) –R [R = radius of circle]

R =2

62 200 0 10(600 400)2

= 223.607 × 10–6

max = 623.607 × 10–6

min = 176.393 × 10–6

tan2P =100 1

600 400 2

P = 13.28°

Major principal strain is at 13.28° in anticlockwise direction from the direction of x and minor

principal strain is 18013.28

2 = 103.28° in anticlockwise direction from the direction of x.

3. Draw bending moment & shear force diagrams for the beam loaded as shown in fig.

10 kN 3kN/m1m

P

2 m 2 m2 m 1 m 1 m

[ 15 Marks ]