scientific meeting about clinical proteomics. 2nd...
TRANSCRIPT
SCIENTIFIC MEETING ABOUT CLINICAL PROTEOMICS. 2nd EDITION. H it l U i it i L P 18 19 N b
Proteomics applied to microbiology and infectious diseases
Hospital Universitario La Paz, 18-19 November
Proteomics applied to microbiology and infectious diseases.Advances in Proteomics.
"Candida albicans host interaction: insights from proteomics"
Dpto. de Microbiología IIUnidad de ProteómicaUnidad de Proteómica Facultad de Farmacia, UCM. Madrid
OUTLINE
Why proteomics to study host-pathogen interaction ?
• To discover proteins of clinical interest: diagnostic and prognostic markers and vaccine candidates
Immunoproteomics with sera of patients with invasive candidiasis (IC)
• To discover new virulence factors and to know which aspects of thei ibl f th d t ti f th thimmune response are responsible for the destruction of the pathogen
Candida albicans –macrophagesp g
COMENSALISM
CANDIDA HOST INTERACTIONAN OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT SETTING FOR HUMAN CANDIDIASIS C. albicans, can cause host damage
Time
Dam
age
COMENSALISM
BIOLOGICAL INTERESTAlteration of
by mechanisms mediatedboth by host (predisposing factors) and by fungus (virulence factors)
INTERACTIONDimorphism
Phenotypic switching
Extracellular hydrolases
AdhesionVirulence
factors FUNGUS Predisposingfactors
Immune response impairment
microfloracomposition
HOST Natural barrier disruption
PROTEOMICS?RO
TEO
MIC
S?
Depending on the
SuperficialChronic mucocutaneous m
age
CANDIDIASIS
Others?impairmentPROTEOMICS?
PR
Depending on theunderlying host defect, C.albicans can cause different types ofinfections
SystemicTime
Dam
No signs andDiagnosis
No rapid and accurate tests
Innate
Acquired
Host immune response
PMN leukocytes
Cellular
Macrophages
PRO
TEOM
IC
Due to the host’sDifficulties
No signs and symptoms
TreatmentSide-effects
Resistance
AcquiredHumoral
Reduced efficacy
CS?
New
Due to the host sdebilitated immune response, together with difficultiesin the diagnosis and treatment the outcome
PROTEOMICS?Time
Dam
age
ERADICATIONPROTEOMICS? diagnostic and therapeuticstrategies
Time
Dam
age
DEATHtreatment, the outcome of these patients is often fatal
CLINICAL INTERESTPitarch, A., Nombela C. and Gil C. “Microbial proteomics: Functional Biology of whole organisms”. Wiley CH, 2006.
To discover proteins of clinical interest:
diagnostic and prognostic markers and vaccine
didcandidates
IMMUNOPROTEOMICS
Pitarch et al., Molecular &Cellular Proteomics. 2006
DIFFERENTIAL IMMNUNOPROTEOMICS IS A SUCCESFUL APPROACH FOR STUDYING THE SEROLOGICAL RESPONSE
THE Candida IMMUNOME
APPROACH FOR STUDYING THE SEROLOGICAL RESPONSE TO THE CANDIDA IMMUNOME (2D , WB AND MS)
SAMPLE PREPARATION (C. albicans proteins)
2-D imaging film
Sera from patients
Group 1(e.g., Healthy
individuals’ sera)
Group 2(e.g., Systemic
candidiasis patients’ sera)IEF SDS
Mr84
+-
2-D gel 2-D blot
g g
Murine(pre)immune sera
or
with/without systemic candidiasis
4 5 6 7 pI
60483530
15
SEPARATION of C. albicans proteins
by 2-DE
DETECTION of C. albicans immunogenicproteins by WESTERN-BLOT and
DEFINITION of“IMMUNE PROTEOMES”
4 5 6 7 p
ELECTROBLOTTINGof 2-D gels onto nitrocellulosemembranes
·
DIFFERENTIAL DISPLAY and QUANTIFICATION by bioinformatic analysis
EXCISION and “IN GEL” DIGESTION of immunogenic
protein spots of interest Discovery Phase
nsity
100
p p
P < 0.0001
vel
THE Candida IMMUNOME
m/z1000 3500
Rel
ativ
e In
ten
0 Group 1 Group 2
Ant
ibod
y le
v
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS using clinical data
IDENTIFICATION of immunogenicproteins of interest by
MS and database searching
m/z1000 3500
Proteins of clinical interest
Group 1 Group 2
Th diff t tiDiagnostic markers?
Prognostic markers?
Vaccine candidates?
The different antigenrecognition patterns
are compared by bioinformatic analysis using clinical data
88 kDa
0h 24h 48h 72h 96h
analysis using clinical data
Proteins can be expressed as
recombinant proteinsHETEROLOGOUS EXPRESSION
of proteins of clinical interest
recombinant proteins
Validation or prototype
VALIDATION in routine assays(e g ELISA)
prototype development phase
(e.g., ELISA)
DETECTION OF ANTIGENS IN PATIENTS WITH INVASIVE CANDIDIASISTHE Candida IMMUNOME
THE Candida IMMUNOME
WESTERN BLOTS WITH SERA FROM PATIENTS WITH INVASIVE CANDIDIASIS (45) AND SERA FROM CONTROL INDIVIDUALS (118)CANDIDIASIS (45) AND SERA FROM CONTROL INDIVIDUALS (118)
IMMUNOSUPRESSED PATIENTS
NON-IMMUNOSUPRESSED PATIENTS
Solid Tumor* Bronchopulmonary neoplasm
* Pancreas/colon adenocarcinoma
Nonmalignant diseases
* Respiratory dysfunction
* Gastrointestinal pathology* Bladder neoplasm
Hematological malignancy
* Leukaemia
Gastrointestinal pathology
* Others
* Lymphoma
* Myolodysplasia
* Multiple myeloma
DETECTION OF ANTIGENS IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC CANDIDIASISTHE Candida IMMUNOME
WESTERN BLOTS WITH SERA FROM PATIENTS WITH INVASIVE CANDIDIASIS (45) AND SERA FROM CONTROL INDIVIDUALS (118)
IMMUNOSUPRESSED PATIENTS NON-IMMUNOSUPRESSED PATIENTS
84
1
IEFSDS 84
IEF
SDS
1
60
1
60 Expression profiles were very heterogeneous
48
35 12
48
3512
4 4 5 5 5 5 pI
303-18 protein spots
6-50 protein spots4 4.5 5 5.5 p
pI4 4.5 5 5.5 6 7 7.5
Control sera were negative or recognized from 1 to 10 spots
BIOMARKER DISCOVERY IN THE WHOLE SOLUBLE Candida PROTEOME
THE Candida IMMUNOME
SOLUBLE Candida PROTEOME
42 different C. albicansproteins becomeproteins become targets of the human immune responseimmune response to systemic candidiasis35 f th35 of them arenew antigens
Pitarch et al., 2004. Proteomics
Cytoplasmic extracts
BIOMARKER DISCOVERY IN THE Candida CELL WALL IMMUNOME (proteins secreted by protoplast in active wall regeneration)
THE Candida IMMUNOME
(proteins secreted by protoplast in active wall regeneration)
THE Candida IMMUNOME
Y t t l tY t t l tYeast protoplastsYeast protoplasts
THE Candida IMMUNOME
Yeast protoplasts after 2 hours of regenerating the cell wall
THE Candida IMMUNOME
WALL ASSOCIATED PROTEINS (PROTEINS SECRETED
IEF
WALL ASSOCIATED PROTEINS (PROTEINS SECRETED BY PROTOPLASTS IN ACTIVE WALL REGENERATION)
11684
Mr
(kDa)
IEFSDSMet6p
84
60
48Gap1p
Eno1p Pgk1p
Metabolic proteins35
28Bgl2p
Fba1pBgl2, glucan 1,3-β-
glucosidase
1528
4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 7 7 5 8 pITpi1p
g
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 p
Pitarch et al., 2006. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
DISTRIBUTION OF SERUM LEVELS OF IgG ANTIBODIES
THE Candida IMMUNOME
LEVELS OF IgG ANTIBODIES AGAINST Candida WALL ASSOCIATED PROTEINS
Their distributiondiffered significantlybetween IC patientsand controls
Pitarch et al., 2006. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
THE Candida IMMUNOME
IT WAS POSSIBLE TO DISCRIMINATE IC PATIENTS FROM CONTROLSIT WAS POSSIBLE TO DISCRIMINATE IC PATIENTS FROM CONTROLS. THIS STUDY HIGHLIGHTED THE HETEROGENICITY OF THEIR EXPRESSION PROFILES Pitarch et al., 2006. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
WHICH ANTIBODIES ARE PREDICTORSTHE Candida IMMUNOME
OF INVASIVE CANDIDIASIS?
Multivariate logistic regression models demonstrated that high levels of antibodies against glucan 1,3-β-glucosidase (Bgl2p) and the anti-wall phophoglycerate kinase antibody seropositivity were the only predictors of IC.
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed no differences between their combined evaluation and measurement of anti-Bgl2p antibodies alone.
Anti Bgl2 IgG antibodies are novel independent biomarkers for early IC diagnosis (78 % sensitivity and 93 % specificity)
ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES FOR THE IDENTIFICATION
THE Candida IMMUNOME
ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF CELL SURFACE PROTEINS
CW
PM
SURFOMEProteins located on the outermost layer of the cell wall.
THE Candida IMMUNOME
Cell integrity assay
Cell surface digestion
Peptide separation
Cell surface digestion
Peptide separation
y
Pellet
Cell integrity assayProtein identification Protein identification
containing cells and debris
SupernatantTryptic digestion
in 5 mM DTT Centrifugation109 cells p
containing tryptic peptides
in 5 mM DTT
37 ºC5 -30 min
3000xg5 min
Peptide separation by Nano-HPLC
and identification in a
Trypsin
TrypControl Trypsinl
DTTl MALDI-TOF-TOF
Surface exposed proteins
+ DTT(no Tryp, no DTT) onlyonly
Raquel Raquel MartínezMartínez--LópezLópez et al., et al., 2008. Proteomics. 2008. Proteomics. HernáezHernáez et al., et al., 2010, Journal of Proteomics2010, Journal of Proteomics
THE Candida IMMUNOMESURFOMEBIOGENESIS OF CELLULAR COMPONENTS
Cell wall organization and biogenesis9 6 10 8 |CA0156| Scw1p glucanase (by homology)5 6 5 4 |CA0822| Exg1p glucan 1,3-beta-glucosidase
5 10 15 30 min
5 6 5 4 |CA0822| Exg1p glucan 1,3 beta glucosidase4 3 3 4 |CA0883| Sun41p Putative cell wall beta-glucosidase (by homology)3 3 3 3 |CA1541| Bgl21p endo-beta-1,3-glucanase (by homology)2 2 2 4 |CA0375| Crh11p Probable membrane protein (by homology)0 1 1 1 |CA5213| Ssr1p Secretory Stress Response protein 1 (by homology)0 1 1 1 |CA0605| Utr2p 1,3-1,4-beta-glucanase (by homology)| | p , , g ( y gy)0 0 1 0 |CA3867| Phr2p pH-regulated protein 25 4 5 4 |CA2303| Tos1p putative Anchor subunit of a-agglutinin (by homology)1 1 1 1 |CA1678| IPF5185 putative cell wall protein (by homology)2 0 0 1 |CA4800| IPF8796 putative GPI-anchhored protein related to Phr1, Phr2 and Phr34 4 6 6 |CA5091| Acf3p endo-1,3-beta-glucanase| | p , g4 2 2 3 |CA5987| Cht3p chitinase 3 precursor1 1 2 1 |CA1053| Scw11p glucanase gene family member, 3-prime end (by homology)3 3 4 4 |CA5344| Pry2p putative pathogen related proteins (by homology)1 1 1 1 |CA1051| Cht2p chitinase 2 precursor
Citoskeleton organization and biogenesis0 0 2 0 |CA5255| Act1p actin (by homology)
CELL RESCUE, DEFENSE AND VIRULENCE6 6 5 5 |CA5232| Sun42p Putative cell wall beta-glucosidase (by homology)0 1 3 0 |CA4336| Ddr48p stress protein (by homology)3 1 2 2 |CA1576| Hyr1p hyphally regulated protein0 3 4 2 |CA2857| Ssa1p Heat shock protein of HSP70 family1 1 1 1 |CA3534| Ssb1p heat shock protein 700 0 1 0 |CA2830| Rbt1p repressed by TUP1 protein 12 2 3 3 |CA0104| Rbt4p repressed by TUP1 protein1 1 1 1 |CA0909| Als1.5p agglutinin-like protein, 5-prime end1 0 1 0 |CA1527| Als4.5p agglutinin-like protein, 5-prime end
THE Candida IMMUNOMESURFOMEMETABOLISM
5 10 15 30 minMETABOLISMMETABOLISM
3 3 3 3 |CA1691| Pgk1p Phosphoglycerate kinase0 1 0 1 |CA3874| Eno1p Enolase I (2-phosphoglycerate dehydratase)0 0 0 1 |CA4765| Adh1p alcohol dehydrogenase (by homology)2 1 2 2 |CA2474| Pdc11p Pyruvate decarboxylase (by homology)0 0 1 1 |CA2162| Pdb1p pyruvate dehydrogenase (by homology)0 0 1 0 |CA5239| Gnd1p 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase
METABOLISM3 3 3 3 |CA1691| Pgk1p Phosphoglycerate kinase0 1 0 1 |CA3874| Eno1p Enolase I (2-phosphoglycerate dehydratase)0 0 0 1 |CA4765| Adh1p alcohol dehydrogenase (by homology)2 1 2 2 |CA2474| Pdc11p Pyruvate decarboxylase (by homology)0 0 1 1 |CA2162| Pdb1p pyruvate dehydrogenase (by homology)0 0 1 0 |CA5239| Gnd1p 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase0 1 1 0 |CA2858| Acs2p acetyl-coenzyme-A synthetase (by homology)0 2 0 1 |CA1983| Ilv5p ketol-acid reducto-isomerase (by homology)1 1 0 0 |CA0959| Sam2p S-adenosylmethionine synthetase 20 0 1 1 |CA0653| Met6p 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine methyltransferase3 0 5 2 |CA5892| Gap1p Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
PROTEIN FATE
0 1 1 0 |CA2858| Acs2p acetyl-coenzyme-A synthetase (by homology)0 2 0 1 |CA1983| Ilv5p ketol-acid reducto-isomerase (by homology)1 1 0 0 |CA0959| Sam2p S-adenosylmethionine synthetase 20 0 1 1 |CA0653| Met6p 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine methyltransferase3 0 5 2 |CA5892| Gap1p Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
PROTEIN FATEPROTEIN FATE0 0 0 1 |CA0915| Kar2p dnaK-type molecular chaperone (by homology)
Protein Synthesis1 1 1 1 |CA2818| Rpl13p Ribosomal protein1 1 2 1 |CA0615| Rpl3p 60S large subunit ribosomal protein L3.e (by homology)0 1 1 1 |CA0736| Rpl20Bp ribosomal protein (by homology)1 1 1 1 |CA1440| Rpl17Bp RPL17B ribosomal protein L17.e1 0 1 1 |CA4225| Rpl39 3p ribosomal protein L39 3 prime end
PROTEIN FATE0 0 0 1 |CA0915| Kar2p dnaK-type molecular chaperone (by homology)
Protein Synthesis1 1 1 1 |CA2818| Rpl13p Ribosomal protein1 1 2 1 |CA0615| Rpl3p 60S large subunit ribosomal protein L3.e (by homology)0 1 1 1 |CA0736| Rpl20Bp ribosomal protein (by homology)1 1 1 1 |CA1440| Rpl17Bp RPL17B ribosomal protein L17.e1 0 1 1 |CA4225| Rpl39 3p ribosomal protein L39 3 prime end1 0 1 1 |CA4225| Rpl39.3p ribosomal protein L39, 3-prime end0 1 1 1 |CA3539| Rps22p ribosomal protein by homology0 1 1 0 |CA4562| Rps8Ap ribosomal protein (by homology)0 0 1 1 |CA4862| Efb1p translation elongation factor eEF1beta1 2 2 3 |CA2810| Eft2p translation elongation factor 22 3 3 2 |CA0362| Tef1p translation elongation factor eEF1 alpha-A chain
1 0 1 1 |CA4225| Rpl39.3p ribosomal protein L39, 3-prime end0 1 1 1 |CA3539| Rps22p ribosomal protein by homology0 1 1 0 |CA4562| Rps8Ap ribosomal protein (by homology)0 0 1 1 |CA4862| Efb1p translation elongation factor eEF1beta1 2 2 3 |CA2810| Eft2p translation elongation factor 22 3 3 2 |CA0362| Tef1p translation elongation factor eEF1 alpha-A chain
TRANSPORT0 0 0 1 |CA2300| Pma1p plasma membrane H+-transporting ATPase 10 0 0 1 |CA3415| Fre30.53p Strong similarity to ferric reductase, internal fragment (by homology)0 0 0 1 |CA2923| Fet32p2 cell surface ferroxidase (by homology)1 1 0 1 |CA5388| Pet9p ADP/ATP carrier protein (by homology)
UNKNOWN
TRANSPORT0 0 0 1 |CA2300| Pma1p plasma membrane H+-transporting ATPase 10 0 0 1 |CA3415| Fre30.53p Strong similarity to ferric reductase, internal fragment (by homology)0 0 0 1 |CA2923| Fet32p2 cell surface ferroxidase (by homology)1 1 0 1 |CA5388| Pet9p ADP/ATP carrier protein (by homology)
UNKNOWN2 1 1 2 |CA4381| IPF20169 unknown function0 2 1 2 |CA5714| IPF2431 similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tsa1p thiol-specific antioxidant-like pro1 1 2 2 |CA0586| IPF13493 Unknown function2 2 2 1 |CA1345| IPF6003 similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msb2p multicopy suppressor of a CDC1 1 0 0 |CA4642| IPF1500 unknown function
2 1 1 2 |CA4381| IPF20169 unknown function0 2 1 2 |CA5714| IPF2431 similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tsa1p thiol-specific antioxidant-like pro1 1 2 2 |CA0586| IPF13493 Unknown function2 2 2 1 |CA1345| IPF6003 similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msb2p multicopy suppressor of a CDC1 1 0 0 |CA4642| IPF1500 unknown function
Some of these proteins can be immunogenic and useful for diagnosis
RELIABILITY OF ANTIBODIES TO CANDIDA METHIONINESYNTHASE AND ENOLASE FOR DIAGNOSIS OF SYSTEMIC
THE Candida IMMUNOME
SYNTHASE AND ENOLASE FOR DIAGNOSIS OF SYSTEMIC CANDIDIASIS
Expression vector used for TAP-rMet6p production in P. pastoris
Structure of the TAP-rMet6p
Pitarch et al. 2007.Proteomics Clin. ApplPitarch et al., 2008.Proteomics Clin Appl.
Diagnostic validation of the ELISA for measurement of serum anti-
THE Candida IMMUNOME
gCandida Met6p and Eno1p IgG antibody concentrations
Distribution of serum anti-Eno1p Distribution of serum anti- pIgG antibody concentrations in SC and non-SC patients according to
their immune system status.
Eno1p IgG antibody concentrations among the
study groups
ENOLASE Specificity 91 % 96 % ; Sensitivity 74% -67 % (immunosupressed and immunocompetent, respectively)MET6 Specificity: 95-100 % , Sensitivity: 62-52 % (with and without iatrogenic immunosupression respectively)
PREDICTION OF THE CLINICAL OUTCOME IN INVASIVE CANDIDIASIS
THE Candida IMMUNOME
PATIENTS BASED ON SERUM PROFILING OF ANTIBODY RESPONSE
Candida albicans total extracts
Poor PrognosisGood Prognosis oo og os sGood og os s
These profiles are too heterogeneous (31 Antigens)
TWO-WAY HIERARCHICAL CLUSTER ANALYSESOF GLOBAL ANTI-CANDIDA ANTIBODY-REACTIVITYPATTERNS IN IC PATIENTS
Serum samples
PATTERNS IN IC PATIENTS
IgG Poor Prognosis Good Prognosisgantibodies
Poor Prognosis Good Prognosis
Serum samples from IC survivors and IC non-survivorssegregated into two distinct groups
Pitarch et al., Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2010 (In Press)
segregated into two distinct groups
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF IC PROGNOSTIC PREDICTOR
Met6p Ssb1p Gap1p Hsp90p Pgk1p
Cross-validation Independent validation
1
3
edic
tor p = 0.001 p = 0.001
-1
1
ostic
pre
-5
-3
C p
rogn
o
PoorPrognosis
GoodPrognosis
PoorPrognosis
GoodPrognosis
-7IC
Prediction strengths of IC prognostic predictorin cross-validation and in independent validation
A general scheme of clinical biomarker development for ICA general scheme of clinical biomarker development for IC.
We validated the IC prognostic predictor
VALIDATION OF IC PROGNOSTIC PREDICTOR BY AN IMMUNOASSAY BASED ON THE 5 ANTI- CANDIDA ANTIBODIES
TwoTwo--way hierarchical cluster analyses of the IC prognostic way hierarchical cluster analyses of the IC prognostic y y p gy y p gpredictor in testing IC patients. Serum samples from IC predictor in testing IC patients. Serum samples from IC survivors and IC nonsurvivors and IC non--survivors survivors segregated into two distinct segregated into two distinct groups validating thegroups validating the immunoproteomicsimmunoproteomics resultsresultsgroups validating the groups validating the immunoproteomicsimmunoproteomics resultsresults
CLINICAL BIOMARKERS FOR INVASIVE CANDIDIASISTHE Candida IMMUNOME
CLINICAL BIOMARKERS FOR INVASIVE CANDIDIASIS
• More than 40 C.albicans antigens were identified using immunoproteomics.
• A systematic proteomic approach coupled with bioinformatic analysis has shown that high levels of antibodies against glucan 1,3-beta-glucosidase (Bgl2p) were predictors of IC.
• We have expressed in Pichia pastoris and Escherichia coli some proteins of clinical interest: Bgl2p, Met6p, Eno1p, Hsp90p, Pgk1p, Ssb1p and Gap1p.
• Analytical and clinical validations of the levels of antibodies against some C. albicans proteins have been carried out.
• We have defined a 5-IgG antibody-reactivity signature for IC prognosis.Antibodies against Met6p, Hsp90p and Pgk1p (putative Candida virulence factors and anti-apoptotic mediators) are associated with good prognosis and p p ) g p gprotective patterns. Antibodies against Ssb1p and Gap1p (potential pro-apoptotic mediators) are associated with poor prognosis and risk patterns.
• The full potential of these antigens for diagnosis and/or follow up of IC is• The full potential of these antigens for diagnosis and/or follow-up of IC is currently being addressed by a large scale screening of patients’ and controls’ serum specimens.
T t d th h t thTo study the host-pathogen interaction:
C albicans macrophagesC.albicans-macrophages
EXPRESSION PROTEOMICS
Fernandez-Arenas et al., Molecular and Cellular Proteomics. 2007
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNCANDIDA ALBICANS MACROPHAGE INTERACTION
CANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
CANDIDA ALBICANS – MACROPHAGE INTERACTION
GENOMICSPROTEOMICS RATIO 1:1PROTEOMICS RATIO 1:1
DNA MICROARRAYS1,5 and 3h. of interaction
DIFFERENTIAL PROTEIN EXPRESSION
3h. of interaction
PROTEIN IDENTIFICATIONCANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
78 PROTEIN SPOTS REPRESENTING 67 DIFFERENT67 DIFFERENT PROTEINS WERE IDENTIFIED BY MALDI TOF/TOF
SMS
(40 over-expressed and 27 under-and 27 underexpressed)
CANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED PROTEINS (Data bases employed: PROTEOME, CANDIDA DB Y CGD)
UNCHARACTERIZED; 6,0%BIOGENESIS OF CELLULAR C compound and carbohydrate
METABOLISM53.7%
CELLULAR TRANSPORT; 6,0%
Assembley of protein Amino acid metabolism; 7 5%
BIOGENESIS OF CELLULARCOMPONENTS; 6,0%
C compound and carbohydratemetabolism; 17,9%
complexes; 3,0%Amino acid metabolism; 7,5%
Nucleotide metabolism; 9,0%
; Lipid and fatty acid β oxidation
Protein folding, modif ication anddegradation ; 16,4%
; Lipid and fatty acid β oxidation7,5%
Metabolism of vitamins; 3,0%
& Oxidative responseDetoxif ication; 10 4% ; Glyoxylate and TCA cycles
Phosphate metabolism; 3,0%
PROTEIN FATE19.4%
Detoxif ication; 10,4% ; Glyoxylate and TCA cycles6,0%
CELL RESCUE, DEFENCE AND VIRULENCE 10.4%
32
CANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
How is the yeast protein response?
WHAT IS THE BIOLOGICAL MEANING OF THESE RESULTS?
C. albicans inside macrophages is in a “
5
10
XPR
ESSE
D
NS
C-COMPOUND (20.3%)
PROTEIN FATE (17.5%)
“hostile environment”:- low nutrients- antimicrobial agents- low pH
0
5
OVE
R-E
XDR
OF
PRO
TEI C COMPOUND (20.3%)
METABOLISM
-5
ER-E
XPR
ESSE
D
NU
MB
ER
Lipid & fatty ac. β oxidationGlyoxylate & TCA cycles (13.5%)
Oxidative stress & detoxification (11%)
-15
-10
UN
DE REFLECTING:
- yeast shift to a starvation mode- utilization of alternative carbon sources
EXPLAINING the yeast response to such an aggressive situation.
Amino acid metabolismNucleotide metabolism
C-compound metabolism
Protein folding
Protein degradation
Assembly of protein complexes
Actin cytoskeletonCell wall
Mitochondria
Lipid & fatty ac. β oxidation
Metab. of vitamins & cofactors
Phosphate metabolismGlyoxylate & TCA cycles
Cellular transport
Oxidative stress & detoxification
Unknown
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EXPRESSION PROFILE (Nº OF UP- AND DOWN-REGULATED GENES) FROM BOTH TIME POINTS
CANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
UP- AND DOWN-REGULATED GENES) FROM BOTH TIME POINTS ANALYZED
-239 regulated genes:
Transport Cell rescue
239 regulated genes:-120 and 119 differentially regulated (1.75 times induced or repressed) after 1,5 and 3 h of interaction respectively
Transcription Protein Synthesis
Transport Cell rescue
Metal ion homeostasis
Transcription Protein Synthesis
Cell rescueMetal ion homeostasis
Uncharacterized genesMetabolism and EnergyCell cycle & DNA processing
Protein FateUncharacterized genes
Metabolism and EnergyCell cycle & DNA processing
Protein FateProtein with binding function
Uncharacterized genesCell cycle & DNA processing Protein with binding function
GENETIC NETWORK ANALYSES OF UNKNOWN GENESCANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
-Osprey v1.2.0 software platform was usedplatform was usedfor visualization and manipulation of complex interaction networks
Input gene list S. cerevisiaeorthologsorthologs of unknown C. albicans genes(induced)
Biogenesis andcell organization (cell wall and nuclear pore)
Damage and DNA repair
Protein biosinthesis
Autophagy
CANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
GENETIC NETWORK ANALYSES OF UNKNOWN GENES
OSPREYOSPREY
Input gene list of S. cerevisiaeorthologs of
kunknown C. albicans genes
(REPRESSED)
Metabolism
Biogenesis and cell i tiorganization
(mitochondria and actin cytoeskeleton)
Transport
Unknown function
ACTIN CYTOSKELETON, cAMP, MITOCHONDRIA, APOPTOSIS AND AUTOPHAGY
CANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
2.79 0
1 13 2 2 3
ARP3*LSB5
1.5 h 3 h DE INTERACCIÓN
AUTOPHAGY
-Reports that connect apoptosis with actin dynamics, fLSB5
RVS161YKE2LIT1ENT4PAN1CAP2
Act
cytoske
mitochondrial dysfunction and autophagy, have been recently described in the model yeast S. cerevisiae.
Th d id d t h i d t t fCAP2MSS4SLA2ARP2Cof1pTpm2p
in
eleton
…..Thus, we decided to search in our datasets for proteins/genes belonging to these biological functions in order to carry out a new interaction network analysis.
0.995 0log2(1#5h) log2(3h)
PDE1FGR38MDM34Atp7pYIM1
cAMP signalingpathway
Mit
-A total of 32 proteins/genes, enclosed in these functions, were detected:
YIM1YME1MAM33*PHB1*Ilv5pMmf1pPor1p
ochond
-SIGNIFICANT REPRESSION IN ACTIN CYTOSKELETON AND MITOCHONDRIA
CAP1MCA1BIR1LCB1IPF12676
ria A
popt
CYTOSKELETON AND MITOCHONDRIA
-UP AND DOWN RESPONSE IN APOPTOTIC AND AUTOPHAGIC GENES
log2(1#5h) log2(3h)
IPF12676IPF12606.3eoc
SUN42VPS30
osisAutophagy
-2 5 2 5
AFTER SEVERAL NETWORKS ANALYSES….A HYPOTHETICAL MODEL OF YEAST CELL DEATH AFTER MACROPHAGE INTERACTION WAS
CANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
DNA damage
Drug - induced apoptosis
Starvation
Ceramide induced –apoptosis
(de novo pathway )
2.79 0
1 13 2 2 3
ARP3*LSB5RVS161
1.5 h 3 h
c
A HYPOTHETICAL MODEL OF YEAST CELL DEATH AFTER MACROPHAGE INTERACTION WAS SUGGESTED
(fragmentation)
LCB1(SPTLC1)
TP53 mediated
t ti
AUTOPHAGY
VPS30(APG6/ BECN1)
Starvation
BAX induced cell death
RVS161YKE2LIT1ENT4PAN1CAP2MSS4
Actin
ytoskeleto
APOPTOSIS
HumanBAX
SUN42(UTH1)
Autophagic cell deathCERAMIDE
IPF12676 (YOL086W-A
/APITD1)
apoptotic pathway
BECN1)
Heat/H2O20.995 0log2(1#5h) log2(3h)
MSS4SLA2ARP2Cof1pTpm2pPDE1FGR38
on
cAMP signalingpathway
MCA1(YCA1)
ROSrelease
IPF12606.3eoc (NMA111/HTRA2)
BIR1(XIAP)
(UTH1)
CAP1(YAP1)
PKA(Stress
2 2
Chronological agingH2O2
MDM34Atp7pYIM1YME1MAM33*PHB1*Il 5
Mitochond
ATP cAMP
PDE1/2
AMP
Inappropriate actin remodeling P 1 ( )
Cytochrome c release
(YCA1) (YAP1)response)
Replicative aging(PHB1/PHB)
Ilv5pMmf1pPor1pCAP1MCA1BIR1LCB1
dria
Apopt
FGR38 (CYR1)
remodeling(stable F-actin)
Por1p (open)Δψm
(VDAC1)(SLA2, PAN1, ARP2/3, CAP2, Cof1p…)
(MDM34, Mmd1p, Atp7p, YME1, Ilv5p…)
MitochondrialNutritional stress
log2(1#5h) log2(3h)
LCB1IPF12676IPF12606.3eocSUN42VPS30
osis
Autophagy
2 5 2 5 Mitochondrialdysfunction
Scale (fold repression or induction)
-2.5 2.5
Fernández-Arenas et al., 2007. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
ANALYSIS OF APOPTOTIC MARKERSCANDIDA HOST INTERACTION
DNA FRAGMENTATION (hallmark of late stage apoptosis)
TUNEL ASSAY (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling) 18 hours C albicans-Macrophages interaction18 hours C.albicans-Macrophages interaction
Collaboration with Dr Mark Ramsdale
Dept Microbiology, UCM
César NombelaGl i M lGloria MoleroLucía MonteolivaAida PitarchCarolina Fernández-HaroJ A R d i C ld óJose A. Rodriguez-CalderónVital VialasClaudia Parra
P t i U it UCMProteomics Unit UCM-Parque Científico
M. Luisa HernáezD l G tiDolores GutierrezMontserrat Martinez-GomarizFelipe ClementeIgnacio Ortea
Hospital Clínico de SalamancaAntonio Jiménez
Hospital 12 de OctubreJose María Aguado
BIO 2009 07654BIO-2009-07654CAMRETICS (ISC III)GENOMA ESPAÑA
www.ucm.es/info/gyp/proteomicagyp p