s 78-inventory management

55
2-1 Inventory Management in Supply Chain Dr. R K Singh Associate Professor, IIFT, Delhi

Upload: pallavi-saxena

Post on 18-Apr-2015

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: S 78-Inventory Management

2-1

Inventory Management in Supply Chain

Dr. R K SinghAssociate Professor, IIFT, Delhi

Page 2: S 78-Inventory Management

2-2

Outline Need for Inventory Management

Single stage inventory control

EOQ model Single period models Multiple order opportunities Risk Pooling

Centralized vs. Decentralized Systems

Practical Issues in Inventory Management

Page 3: S 78-Inventory Management

2-3

Definitions

Inventory-A physical resource that a firm holds in stock with the intent of selling it or transforming it into a more valuable state.

Inventory System- A set of policies and controls that monitors levels of inventory and determines what levels should be maintained, when stock should be replenished, and how large orders should be

Page 4: S 78-Inventory Management

2-4

Supply

Sources:plantsvendorsports

RegionalWarehouses:stocking points

Field Warehouses:stockingpoints

Customers,demandcenterssinks

Production/purchase costs

Inventory &warehousing costs

Transportation costs Inventory &

warehousing costs

Transportation costs

Page 5: S 78-Inventory Management

2-5

Reasons for Inventories

Improve customer serviceEconomies of purchasingEconomies of productionTransportation savingsHedge against futureUnplanned shocks (labor strikes, natural

disasters, surges in demand, etc.)To maintain independence of supply chain

Page 6: S 78-Inventory Management

2-6

Goals: Reduce Cost, Improve Service

By effectively managing inventory:Xerox eliminated $700 million inventory from

its supply chainWal-Mart became the largest retail company

utilizing efficient inventory managementGM has reduced parts inventory and

transportation costs by 26% annuallyReliance Industries, Tata motors, Maruti,

Pantaloon, Big Bazar

Page 7: S 78-Inventory Management

2-7

Goals: Reduce Cost, Improve Service

By not managing inventory successfully In 1994, “IBM continued to struggle with shortages in

their ThinkPad line”

In 1993, “Dell Computers was sharply off in its forecast of demand, resulting in inventory write downs

The average carrying cost of inventory across all mfg.. in the U.S. is 30-35% of its value.

Indian Oil, Bharat Petroleum, FCI

Page 8: S 78-Inventory Management

2-8

Inventory Management-Demand Forecasts

Uncertain demand makes demand forecast critical for inventory related decisions:What to order?When to order?How much is the optimal order quantity?

Approach includes a set of techniquesINVENTORY POLICY!!

Page 9: S 78-Inventory Management

2-9

Supply Chain Factors in Inventory Policy

Estimation of customer demand Replenishment lead time The number of different products being considered The length of the planning horizon Costs

Order cost: Product cost Administration cost (Purchase orders, receiving the orders) Transportation cost

Inventory holding cost, or inventory carrying cost: State taxes, property taxes, and insurance on inventories Maintenance costs Obsolescence cost Opportunity costs

Service level requirements

Page 10: S 78-Inventory Management

2-10

Single Stage Inventory Control Single supply chain stage

Variety of techniques/approaches

Economic Lot Size Model Single Period Models Multiple Order Opportunities Continuous Review Policy Periodic Review Policy

Page 11: S 78-Inventory Management

2-11

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)Model

FIGURE Inventory level as a function of time

Page 12: S 78-Inventory Management

2-12

Assumptions

D items per day: Constant demand rate Q items per order: Order quantities are fixed, K, fixed setup cost, incurred every time the warehouse

places an order. h, inventory carrying cost accrued per unit held in

inventory per day that the unit is held (also known as, holding cost)

Lead time = 0 (the time that elapses between the placement of an order and its receipt)

Initial inventory = 0

Page 13: S 78-Inventory Management

2-13

Deriving EOQ

Average inventory level: Q/2 No of Orders=D/Q Average total cost per unit time: 2

hQ

Q

KD

h

KD•(EOQ) Q

2*

Page 14: S 78-Inventory Management

2-14

EOQ: Costs

FIGURE Economic lot size model: total cost per unit time

Page 15: S 78-Inventory Management

2-15

Sensitivity Analysis

b .5 .8 .9 1 1.1 1.2 1.5 2

Increase in cost

25% 2.5% 0.5% 0 .4% 1.6% 8.9% 25%

Total inventory cost relatively insensitive to order quantities

Actual order quantity: Q Q is a multiple b of the optimal order quantity Q*. For a given b, the quantity ordered is Q = bQ*

Page 16: S 78-Inventory Management

2-16

Demand Uncertainty

The forecast is not 100% correct.

The longer the forecast horizon, the worse the forecast

Aggregate forecasts are more accurate.

Page 17: S 78-Inventory Management

2-17

Single Period Models

Short lifecycle productsOne ordering opportunity onlyOrder quantity to be decided before

demand occurs

Order Quantity > Demand => Dispose excess inventory

Order Quantity < Demand => Lose sales/profits

Page 18: S 78-Inventory Management

2-18

Single Period Models

Using historical data identify a variety of demand scenarios

Given a specific inventory policy determine the profit associated with a particular

scenario

Order the quantity that maximizes the average profit.

Page 19: S 78-Inventory Management

2-19

Relationship Between Optimal Quantity and Average Demand

Compare marginal profit of selling an additional unit and marginal cost of not selling an additional unit

Marginal profit/unit = Selling Price - Variable Ordering (or, Production) Cost

Marginal cost/unit =Variable Ordering (or, Production) Cost - Salvage Value

If Marginal Profit > Marginal Cost => Optimal Quantity > Average Demand

If Marginal Profit < Marginal Cost => Optimal Quantity < Average Demand

Page 20: S 78-Inventory Management

2-20

Multiple Order Opportunities

REASONS

To balance annual inventory holding costs and annual fixed order costs.

To satisfy demand occurring during lead time. To protect against uncertainty in demand.

TWO POLICIES

Continuous review policy

Periodic review policy

Page 21: S 78-Inventory Management

2-21

Continuous Review Policy

Daily demand is random and follows a normal distribution.

Inventory level is continuously reviewed

The distributor specifies a required service level.

Page 22: S 78-Inventory Management

2-22

AVG = Average daily demand

STD = Standard deviation of daily demand

L = Replenishment lead time h = Cost of holding one unit of the product for

one day at the distributor

α = service level.

Continuous Review Policy

Page 23: S 78-Inventory Management

2-23

(Q,R) policy – whenever inventory level falls to a reorder level R, place an order for Q units

What is the value of R?

Continuous Review Policy

Page 24: S 78-Inventory Management

2-24

Continuous Review Policy

Average demand during lead time: L x AVG

Safety stock:

Reorder Level, R:

Order Quantity, Q:

LSTDz

LSTDzAVGL

h

AVGKQ

2

Page 25: S 78-Inventory Management

2-25

Service Level & Safety Factor, z

Service Level

90% 91% 92% 93% 94% 95% 96% 97% 98% 99% 99.9%

z 1.29 1.34 1.41 1.48 1.56 1.65 1.75 1.88 2.05 2.33 3.08

z is chosen from statistical tables to ensure that the probability of stockouts during lead time is exactly 1 - α

Page 26: S 78-Inventory Management

2-26

Inventory Level Over Time

LSTDz Inventory level before receiving an order =

Inventory level after receiving an order =

Average Inventory =

LSTDzQ

LSTDzQ 2

FIGURE : Inventory level as a function of time in a (Q,R) policy

Page 27: S 78-Inventory Management

2-27

Continuous Review Policy Example

A distributor of TV sets that orders from a manufacturer and sells to retailers

Fixed ordering cost = $4,500Cost of a TV set to the distributor = $250Annual inventory holding cost = 18% of

product costReplenishment lead time = 2 weeksExpected service level = 97%

Page 28: S 78-Inventory Management

2-28

Month Sept Oct Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug

Sales 200 152 100 221 287 176 151 198 246 309 98 156

Continuous Review Policy Example

Average monthly demand = 191.17

Standard deviation of monthly demand = 66.53

Average weekly demand = Average Monthly Demand/4.3

Standard deviation of weekly demand = Monthly standard deviation/√4.3

Page 29: S 78-Inventory Management

2-29

Parameter Average weekly demand

Standard deviation of weekly demand

Average demand during lead time

Safety stock

Reorder point

Value 44.58 32.08 89.16 86.20 176

87.052

25018.0

Weekly holding cost =

Optimal order quantity = 67987.

58.44500,42

Q

Average inventory level = 679/2 + 86.20 = 426

Continuous Review Policy Example

Page 30: S 78-Inventory Management

2-30

Inventory level is reviewed periodically at regular intervals

An appropriate quantity is ordered after each review Two Cases:

Short Intervals (e.g. Daily) (s, S) policy

Longer Intervals (e.g. Weekly or Monthly Base-stock level policy

Periodic Review Policy

Page 31: S 78-Inventory Management

2-31

(s,S) policy

Calculate the Q and R values as if this were a continuous review model

Set s equal to RSet S equal to R+Q.

Page 32: S 78-Inventory Management

2-32

Base-Stock Level Policy Determine a target inventory level, the base-

stock level review the inventory position and order enough

to raise the inventory position to the base-stock level

Assume:r = length of the review periodL = lead time AVG = average daily demand STD = standard deviation of this daily demand.

Page 33: S 78-Inventory Management

2-33

Base-Stock Level Policy

FIGURE Inventory level as a function of time in a periodic review policy

Page 34: S 78-Inventory Management

2-34

Average demand during an interval of r + L days=

Safety Stock= LrSTDz

AVGLr )(

Base-Stock Level Policy

Page 35: S 78-Inventory Management

2-35

. What is the appropriate level of service? May be determined by the downstream

customerRetailer may require the supplier, to maintain a

specific service levelSupplier will use that target to manage its own

inventoryFacility may have the flexibility to choose the

appropriate level of servicethe higher the service level, the higher the

inventory level.

Service Level Optimization

Page 36: S 78-Inventory Management

2-36

Retail Strategy

Given a target service level across all products determine service level for each SKU so as to maximize expected profit.

Everything else being equal, service level will be higher for products with:high profit marginhigh volumelow variabilityshort lead time

Page 37: S 78-Inventory Management

2-37

Risk Pooling

Demand variability is reduced

Decrease in safety stock and therefore reduces average inventory.

Demand Variation Standard deviation Coefficient of variation

Page 38: S 78-Inventory Management

2-38

The higher the coefficient of variation, the greater the benefit from risk pooling

risk pooling benefits are higher in situations where demands observed at warehouses are negatively correlated

Reallocation of items from one market to another easily accomplished in centralized systems.

Critical Points

Page 39: S 78-Inventory Management

2-39

Centralized vs. Decentralized Systems

Safety stock Service level Overhead costs Customer lead time Transportation costs

Page 40: S 78-Inventory Management

2-40

Acme Risk Pooling Case Electronic equipment manufacturer and distributor 2 warehouses for distribution in New York and New

Jersey (partitioning the northeast market into two regions)

Customers (that is, retailers) receiving items from warehouses (each retailer is assigned a warehouse)

Warehouses receive material from Chicago Current rule: 97 % service level Each warehouse operate to satisfy 97 % of demand

(3 % probability of stock-out)

Page 41: S 78-Inventory Management

2-41

Replace the 2 warehouses with a single warehouse (located some suitable place) and try to implement the same service level 97 %

Delivery lead times may increase But may decrease total inventory investment

considerably.

New Idea

Page 42: S 78-Inventory Management

2-42

Historical Data

PRODUCT A

Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Massachusetts 33 45 37 38 55 30 18 58

New Jersey 46 35 41 40 26 48 18 55

Total 79 80 78 78 81 78 36 113

PRODUCT B

Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Massachusetts 0 3 3 0 0 1 3 0

New Jersey 2 4 3 0 3 1 0 0

Total 2 6 3 0 3 2 3 0

Page 43: S 78-Inventory Management

2-43

Summary of Historical DataStatistics Product Average Demand Standard

Deviation of Demand

Coefficient of Variation

Massachusetts A 39.3 13.2 0.34

Massachusetts B 1.125 1.36 1.21

New Jersey A 38.6 12.0 0.31

New Jersey B 1.25 1.58 1.26

Total A 77.9 20.71 0.27

Total B 2.375 1.9 0.81

Page 44: S 78-Inventory Management

2-44

Inventory LevelsProduct Average

Demand During Lead Time

Safety Stock Reorder Point

Q

Massachusetts A 39.3 25.08 65 132

Massachusetts B 1.125 2.58 4 25

New Jersey A 38.6 22.8 62 31

New Jersey B 1.25 3 5 24

Total A 77.9 39.35 118 186

Total B 2.375 3.61 6 33

Page 45: S 78-Inventory Management

2-45

Savings in Inventory

Average inventory for Product A: At NJ warehouse is about 88 units At MA warehouse is about 91 units In the centralized warehouse is about 132 units Average inventory reduced by about 25 percent

Average inventory for Product B: At NJ warehouse is about 15 units At MA warehouse is about 14 units In the centralized warehouse is about 20 units

Average inventory reduced by about 33 percent

Page 46: S 78-Inventory Management

2-46

Echelons and echelon inventory

Echelon inventory at any stage or level of the system equals the inventory on hand at the echelon, plus all downstream inventory (downstream means closer to the customer)

Managing Inventory in the Supply Chain

Page 47: S 78-Inventory Management

2-47

Echelon Inventory

FIGURE : A serial supply chain

Page 48: S 78-Inventory Management

2-48

Reorder Point with Echelon Inventory

Le = echelon lead time, lead time between the retailer and the

distributor plus the lead time between the distributor and its supplier, the wholesaler.

AVG = average demand at the retailer STD = standard deviation of demand at

the retailerReorder point ee LSTDzAVGLR

Page 49: S 78-Inventory Management

2-49

4-Stage Supply Chain Example

Average weekly demand faced by the retailer is 45

Standard deviation of demand is 32 At each stage, management is attempting

to maintain a service level of 97% (z=1.88) Lead time between each of the stages,

and between the manufacturer and its suppliers is 1 week

Page 50: S 78-Inventory Management

2-50

Costs and Order Quantities

K D H Q

retailer 250 45 1.2 137

distributor 200 45 .9 141

wholesaler 205 45 .8 152

manufacturer 500 45 .7 255

Page 51: S 78-Inventory Management

2-51

Reorder Points at Each Stage

For the retailer, R=1*45+1.88*32*√1 = 105For the distributor, R=2*45+1.88*32*√2 =

175For the wholesaler, R=3*45+1.88*32*√3 =

239For the manufacturer, R=4*45+1.88*32*√4

= 300

Page 52: S 78-Inventory Management

2-52

More than One Facility at Each Stage

Follow the same approach Echelon inventory at the warehouse is the

inventory at the warehouse, plus all of the inventory in transit to and in stock at each of the retailers.

Similarly, the echelon inventory position at the warehouse is the echelon inventory at the warehouse, plus those items ordered by the warehouse that have not yet arrived minus all items that are backordered.

Page 53: S 78-Inventory Management

2-53

Warehouse Echelon Inventory

FIGURE : The warehouse echelon inventory

Page 54: S 78-Inventory Management

2-54

Practical Issues Periodic inventory review. Tight management of usage rates, lead times, and

safety stock. Reduce safety stock levels. Introduce or enhance cycle counting practice. ABC approach. Shift more inventory or inventory ownership to

suppliers. Quantitative approaches. FOCUS: not reducing costs but reducing inventory levels. Significant effort in industry to increase inventory turnover

LevelInventoryAverage

SalesAnnualRatioTurnoverInventory

__

___

Page 55: S 78-Inventory Management

2-55

SUMMARY

Matching supply with demand a major challenge Forecast demand is always wrong Longer the forecast horizon, less accurate the

forecast Aggregate demand more accurate than

disaggregated demand Need the most appropriate technique Need the most appropriate inventory policy