road safety management and coordination. crash data as a
TRANSCRIPT
Road safety management and coordination.
Crash data as a basis for determining effective policy measures,
allocation of resources and measuring the progress.
MARIYA IVCHENKO
2nd Working Group 1 Meeting
Institutional Coordination and Data Systems
Knowledge Exchange Workshop
March 5th, 2018
Tbilisi, Georgia
‘EVIDENCE BASED AND DATA DRIVEN’ ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENT
1806 1795
1624 1670
14191539
903
50
250
450
650
850
1050
1250
1450
1650
1850
2050
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Fatalities Linear (Fatalities)
Quantitative road safety targets require better structured approach to road safety management:
• Data-driven problem identification• Development of evidence-driven countermeasure packages
formalised in a Strategy• Transparent lines of institutional accountability
❑ Realistic Targets ❑ Road Safety Strategy and Road Safety Action Plan❑ Monitoring Progress
THE IMPORTANCE OF HIGH-QUALITY
ROAD SAFETY DATA
CURRENT SITUATION
DESIRED SITUATION
What is the problem?
Where is the problem?
FIELD OF WORK
LOCATION
How to manage the problem?
ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENT
INDICATORS OF ROAD SAFETY WORK
Indicators related to the road safety activities in relation to the PROBLEMS IN THE AREA
Indicators related to the ENGAGEMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Indicators related to the
ACHIEVED RESULTSIndicators related to MEASURING PERFORMANCE OF
ROAD SAFETY WORK - BENCHMARKING
INDICATORS OF ROAD SAFETY
WORK
INDICATOR: where we are,
where we are going and
how far we are from the goal
Coordination at national levelLeading Agency???
National Road Safety Council???
Government
Ministry in charge for Transport
Ministry of Interior – Traffic police
Ministry of Health
Ministry of Education
Public Agency for State Roads
Local communities (cities and municipalities)
National office for statistics
Republic geodetic authority
…
❑ Road Safety Strategy and Road Safety Action Plan❑ Road Safety ROADMAP❑ Legal act(s) important for activities of road safety
High political commitment:
Declaration on road safety to be endorsed on highest political level during the next TEN-T Days in Ljubljana on April, 27th 2018
EaP TARGET: 25% reduction in road deaths by 2020 compared to 2016
National EaPCs road safety strategies/targets
• the number of fatalities,
• the number of fatalities per 100 000 population,
• the number of fatalities per 10 000 vehicles.
Evaluation of road safety situation in EaPCs basis of:
IMPORTANCE OF ROAD ACCIDENT DATA – Road accidents trend analysis in accordance with the EaPCs road safety goals
1810 1838
1658
1719
16031667
171417041780
19551892
1595
11831198
1090
1215
1496
1331
1100
1048
1275
854868
960
843910
968905
810
660731
688650
536
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
180001981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Th
e n
um
ber
of
road
death
s
Nu
mb
er
of
road
accid
en
ts w
ith
casu
alt
ies
The number of road accidents with casualties The number of road deaths
MONITORING OF THE ROAD SAFETY STATUS
EC TARGET: Halving the overall number of road deaths in the European Union by 2020 starting from 2010!
National road safety strategies targets
• the number of fatalities,
• the number of fatalities per 100 000 population,
• the number of fatalities per 10 000 vehicles.
Evaluation of road safety situation in EaPCs basis of:
IMPORTANCE OF ROAD ACCIDENT DATA – Road accidents trend analysis in accordance with EC road safety goals
IMPORTANCE OF ROAD ACCIDENT DATA – Trend analysis in accordance with EC or UN road safety goals – example from SEETO countries
1806 1795
1624 1670
14191539
903
50
250
450
650
850
1050
1250
1450
1650
1850
2050
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Fatalities Linear (Fatalities)
9.1 9.28.4
8.8
7.78.4
4.5
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Fatalities per 100 000 population
Linear (Fatalities per 100 000 population)
14,8%7,7%
!The SEETO Regional Participants are still far away from reaching the target of European Commission!
In order to achieve the EC goal, the reduction in road deaths by even 41,3% by 2020 is needed, comparing to 2015.
European
Commission
objectives
Benchmarking as a part of road safety management
EC 7 objectives vs UN 5 Pillars
1. Traffic safety management2. Vehicle safety3. Roads4. Road users5. Post crash activities
EFFICIENT ROAD SAFETY
MANAGEMENTSAFER ROADS SAFER VEHICLES
SAFER ROAD USERS
POST CRASH CARE
UN 5 Pillars – Benchmarking based on UN 5 pillarsBenchmarking as a part of road safety management
50%
50%
45%
31%
52%
35%
75%
Improve education and
training of road users
Increase enforcement of
road rule
Safer road infrastructure
Safer vehicles
Promote the use of
modern technology to
increase road safety
Improve emergency and
post-injuries services
Protect vulnerable road
users
OVERALL IMPLEMENTATION OF EU 7 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES FOR REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
80%
60%
60%
100%
Powered-two-wheelers
(PTWs)
Pedestrians, cyclists
Elderly people and
people with disabilities
Children
Objective No. 7 – Protect vulnerable road users
?175
59
11
170
49
128
50
10
130
47
158
68
14
176
40
140
56
12
146
48
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Pedestrian Cyclists Children Elderly peopleover years
(65+)
Motorizedtwo-wheelers
Serbia - Trends for Vulnerable road users
Fatalities 2013 Fatalities 2014 Fatalities 2015 Fatalities 2016
IMPORTANCE OF ROAD ACCIDENT DATA – Benchmarking and data analysis – Example from Serbia
Benchmarking results – CURRENT STATE
60%
75%
100%100%
20%
Strategic basis
The quality of Pre-testlearning
The quality of Drivinglicence test
The quality of Post-licence training
(professional drivers)
The quality of Post-licence training
(drivers withdisabilities and over
65)
Improve education and training of road users
SEETO participant
50%
50%
100%100%
0%
Strategic basis
The quality of Pre-testlearning
The quality of Drivinglicence test
The quality of Post-licence training
(professional drivers)
The quality of Post-licence training
(drivers withdisabilities and over
65)
Improve education and training of road users
SEETO participant 100%
100%
100%100%
60%
Strategic basis
The quality of Pre-testlearning
The quality of Drivinglicence test
The quality of Post-licence training
(professional drivers)
The quality of Post-licence training
(drivers withdisabilities and over
65)
Improve education and training of road users
SEETO participant
Benchmarking results - 6 MONTHS AFTER Benchmarking results - 1 YEAR AFTER
EXAMPLE OF MONITORING FRAMEWORK FOR ROAD SAFETY SYSTEM OF SEETO PARTICIPANTS
MONITORING BASED ON BENCHMARKING AND ROAD ACCIDENT DATA – Example from SEETO countries
CONCLUSION
Understanding the situation
Directing and planning of activities
Better organization
of road
safety work
QUALITY ROAD
SAFETY DATABASE
