richmond hills stages 6 & 7 - mackay council · richmond hills stages 6 & 7 . mackay habana...

88
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT Richmond Hills Stages 6 & 7 Mackay Habana Road, Richmond Reconfiguration of a Lot (Development Permit) Date – 12 April 2013

Upload: others

Post on 12-Jun-2020

23 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT

Richmond Hills Stages 6 & 7 Mackay Habana Road, Richmond

Reconfiguration of a Lot (Development Permit)

Date – 12 April 2013

michellem
Received (Manual Date)

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 2

Pointglen Developments retains ownership and copyright of the contents of this document including drawings, plans, figures and other work produced by Pointglen Developments. This document is not to be reproduced in full or in part, unless separately approved by Pointglen Developments. Council may use this document only for the purpose for which it was prepared. No third party is entitled to use or rely on this document.

This report is based on our opinion of the town planning issues that arise from the statutory provisions relating to this site. Comments and conclusions in or construed from this report relating to matters of law are not to be relied upon. You should only rely upon the advice of your professional legal advisors with respect to matters of law. The validity and comprehensiveness of supplied information has not been independently verified and, for the purposes of this report, it is assumed that the information provided to Pointglen Developments is both complete and accurate. Whilst, to the best of our knowledge, the information contained in this report is accurate at the date of issue, changes may occur to the site conditions, the site context or the applicable planning framework. This report should not be used after any such changes without consulting the provider of the report or a suitably qualified person.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 3

CONTENTS 1. Application Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4

1.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 4

1.2 Approval/s Sought................................................................................................................... 4

2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 8

2.1 Mandatory Information .......................................................................................................... 8

3. Site Characteristics .......................................................................................................................... 9

3.1 Site Context ............................................................................................................................. 9

3.2 Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................................... 10

3.3 Site Contamination ............................................................................................................... 10

4. Proposal ........................................................................................................................................ 11

4.1 Proposal Details – Reconfiguring a Lot ................................................................................. 11

5. Planning Framework & Assessment.............................................................................................. 14

5.1 Sustainable Planning Act 2009 .............................................................................................. 14

5.2 Existing Approvals / Instruments .......................................................................................... 15

5.3 Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional Plan ...................................................................... 16

5.4 State Planning Policies .......................................................................................................... 16

5.5 Consolidated Mackay City Planning Scheme 2009 ............................................................... 17

6. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 22

APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................. 23

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (ATTACHED / ENCLOSED) .................................................................. 23

Engineering Report

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 4

1. Application Summary

1.1 Summary

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Lot 1 on RP714389 and Lot 903 on SP185586 and Lot 905 on SP255642

ADDRESS Richmond, QLD 4740

SITE AREA 48.918 Hectares (8.868 Ha + 24.62 Ha + 15.43 Ha respectively)

APPLICANT Pointglen Developments Pty Ltd

OWNERSHIP Illuka Investments P/L A.C.N. 106 737 151 Refer to Appendix for current title searches

CONTACT Paul Thompson c/- Pointglen Developments PO Box 8158, MT PLEASANT QLD 4740 Ph 07 4968 0000 Fax 07 4942 4648 Email [email protected]

LOCAL AUTHORITY Mackay Regional Council

PLANNING SCHEME Consolidated Mackay City Planning Scheme as adopted 13 May 09

PLANNING SCHEME LOCALITY / PRECINCT

LOCALITY: Frame PRECINCT: McReadys Creek

ZONE Lot 903 on SP185586 – Rural Lot 1 on RP714389 and Lot 905 on SP255642 – Urban Expansion

PLANNING SCHEME OVERLAYS

Bushfire Management Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Development on Steep Land Good Quality Agricultural Land Landscape Character

CURRENT USE Agriculture – cane farming and grazing

REFERRAL AGENCIES Concurrence: Department of Transport and Main Roads

1.2 Approval/s Sought

DEVELOPMENT TYPE DETAILS / DEFINED USES DOCUMENTS SOUGHT FOR

APPROVAL

Reconfiguring a Lot (Development Permit)

Stages 6 and 7. 3 existing lots into a total of 84 residential lots and 3 balance lots. To be subdivided in stages.

Plan/s of Development in Appendix A

Other Currency period of 6 years sought

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 5

FIGURE 1 – Locality Map

LEGEND SUBJECT SITE

LOCA LITY MA P

DATE 11 April 2013 JOB NO.> 5005 0620 SCALE No particular scale SOURCE Google Maps

Development Assessment Report

11 April 2013 6

FIGURE 2 – Zoning Map

LEGEND

Open Space Public Purpose Rural Rural Residential Urban Expansion Urban Residential

Z O N ING MA P

DATE 9 April 2013 JOB NO.> 5005 0520 SCALE No particular scale SOURCE Council Mi-Maps website

OAKVIEW ST

PARKEDGE AVE

JANM

AC C

T

STAGE 4

STAGE 5

STAGE 6

STAGE 7

STAGE 3

Development Assessment Report

11 April 2013 7

FIGURE 3 – Aerial Map

AERIAL MAP

DATE 11 April 2013 JOB NO.> 5005 0520 SCALE No particular scale SOURCE Mi Maps

OAKVIEW ST

PARKEDGE AVE

JANM

AC C

T

STAGE 4

STAGE 5

STAGE 6

STAGE 7

STAGE 3

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 8

2. Introduction

This planning report accompanies a Development Application over land accessed off Grangewood Avenue, and located near the Mackay Habana Road and Boveys Road, Richmond (referred to hereafter as “Richmond Hills” estate).

Richmond Hills estate is a masterplanned residential development expected to yield about 650 lots and will be developed in stages. The Application is for the development of parts of the site known as Stages 6 and 7 of Richmond Hills estate as identified on Figure 1 – Location map of this report. Stages 6 and 7 directly adjoin, and are a logical extension to, Stages 3 and 5.

Stages 3 and 4 have an RoL and Operational Works approval. Construction of Stage 3 has been commissioned to commence in 2013. Stage 4 construction is anticipated to commence in 2014.

Stage 5 (in RoL application phase) will be developed prior to Stages 6 & 7.

A Relevant Period of 6 years is sought to ensure previous stages of development are constructed without the need for further extension requests. This period is considered realistic and in line with the development program.

Accordingly, this application is for a development permit (reconfiguration of a lot) to create (as separable stages) 84 residential lots.

2.1 Mandatory Information

The common material of this application includes all of the “mandatory supporting information”, which constitutes a ‘properly made application’ under section 261 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA).

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 9

3. Site Characteristics

3.1 Site Context

3.1.1 Location

The subject site is located off the Mackay-Habana Road, Richmond (refer to Figure 1 – Location Map) within the City of Mackay Local Government Area (“LGA”). The site is situated within close proximity to the Mackay-Bucasia Road, Mackay Golf Course, and the retail and community facilities of Rural View.

3.1.2 Road Frontage and Practical Access

The subject site is accessed via Grangewood Avenue– Stage 2 Richmond Hills and Stage 5. Lot 903 on SP185586 is bound by Boveys Road at its far western boundary.

3.1.3 Current Use of Site

The subject site is currently used for agriculture – cane farming and grazing.

3.1.4 Surrounding Land Uses and Built Form

The subject site is surrounded by various land uses and built form as outlined below:

DIRECTION BUILT FORM LAND USE

North Developing urban land (Premier Vista Estate), residential dwellings and caneland.

Vacant, and rural residential, and cane farm.

South Developing urban land (Richmond Hills Estate), residential dwellings and caneland.

Horse paddock and residential.

East Cane paddock Broad scale sugar cane farming West Cane paddock, including a farm

house and associated farm sheds and a rural res dwelling.

Broad scale sugar cane farming and a rural residential property

3.1.5 Existing Significant Vegetation

The residential development contains no remnant vegetation and does not involve the clearing of vegetation. The balance subject site is also clear of remnant vegetation. Broad scale clearing of the site was undertaken long ago for the purposes of farming, with the dominant vegetation on site now cane.

3.1.6 Topography

The Plans of Development in Appendix A include existing contours that show the land undulating from Stage 5 and the existing residential stage 2. The land form varies from gently undulating to

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 10

between 10-20% grade. A slope analysis is included in the accompanying Engineering Report.

3.1.7 Easements

The site is encumbered by easements relating to infrastructure provided in Stage 1 of the development. These easements include a trunk water main leading from Premier Vista into the site, and a trunk sewer main heading east. Refer Sketch 0219 in Appendix H showing existing infrastructure and easements.

3.1.8 Flooding and Stormwater Drainage

McReadys Creek adjoins proposed Stage 5 at the south east corner. Drainage has been provided through an open drain in Stage 5 (lot 903) to McReadys Creek as well as through the Stage 5 road network to the open space adjoining McReadys Creek

An extensive hydraulic analysis for the Richmond Hills site was undertaken as part of the existing development approvals to determine a flood strategy. The analysis concludes that there will be no detrimental impact generated on upstream or downstream properties in accordance with the recommended measures within the report (Refer accompanying Engineering Report, including the Hydraulic Flood Analysis).

3.1.9 Existing Infrastructure Services

A trunk water main leads from the north through Premier Vista and then into the site. A trunk sewer main heads east from the proposed park lot 902. Both services are covered by existing easements (Refer Sketch 0219 in Appendix H). The easement strategy is shown on the Plan of Development in Appendix A where existing easements are cancelled or partially cancelled where they have been catered for within the proposed development.

3.2 Cultural Heritage

The risk of an indigenous cultural heritage find is relatively low given the extent of prior site disturbance associated with historic land use and site disturbance. The Applicant is aware of the duty of care responsibilities under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003, in the event that aboriginal cultural heritage is encountered during site development activities.

3.3 Site Contamination

The site is not included within the Environmental Management Register, or the Contaminated Land Register (refer to Appendix D – CLR and EMR Searches) and is not known to have contained any notifiable activity. Accordingly, the site is not expected to contain any contamination.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 11

4. Proposal

This section of the report provides a summary of the proposed development shown in the Appendix A – Plans of Development. The following sections of this report discuss the key planning issues.

The Applicant proposes to construct 84 urban residential allotments and road. The development will be completed in stages – called stages 6 and 7 – and form part of a master-planned estate of about 650 allotments.

The site is generally contained in the Urban Expansion Zone. However, part of proposed lots 215 and 216 slightly encroach into Lot 903 on SP185586, which is zoned Rural. Lot 903 has a Preliminary MCU Approval that overrides the Planning Scheme Zone “so that any future development application on the site will be assessed as if the land is located in the Mackay Frame Locality, McReadys Creek Precinct and Urban Residential Zone”. Refer DA 2007-536 for the Decision Notice.

4.1 Proposal Details – Reconfiguring a Lot

4.1.1 Relevant Period

Stages 3, 4 & 5 will be developed prior to the subject stages. Accordingly, a Relevant Period of 6 years is sought to ensure previous stages of development are constructed without the need for further extension requests. This period is considered realistic and in line with the development program.

4.1.2 Masterplan

The site is being developed as a masterplanned estate. Infrastructure is being developed in a coordinated manner that accounts for future upstream catchments.

Refer Masterplan layout in Appendix H, and the Masterplan Park Agreement in Appendix E. Also, Masterplanned water, sewer, road hierarchy and stormwater quality infrastructure plans / strategies are included in the accompanying Engineering report.

4.1.3 Allotment Characteristics

A Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot (Code Assessment) is sought for Stages 6-7 of the development. Approval is sought for development in accordance with the Plan of Development in Appendix A.

Some of the allotments will be elevated. The civil design of the estate will endeavour to minimize allotment slope through appropriate road placement and earthworks design.

Lot densities have been increased from earlier stages. Stages 6 and 7 includes lots sized from 607m² that are of standard configuration and standard freehold (not community title) format.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 12

4.1.4 Staging

Stage 5 will be developed prior to the construction of Stages 6 & 7 to ensure the appropriate infrastructure connectivity.

4.1.5 Open Space Strategy

The estate will be provided with open space areas in a masterplanned and staged fashion for the use of the Richmond Hills and surrounding residents and in accordance with the Park Masterplan in Appendix E, notably:

• A high quality and comprehensive “Village Park” has been provided within Stage 1 for use by Richmond Hills estate and adjoining estates. This park includes landscaped play areas, kick about spaces, hiking and biking trails and sheltered picnic areas.

• An open space link to the Stage 1 Village Park is strongly encouraged along the McReadys Creek riparian zone in the adjoining development to the east of Richmond Hills estate.

• A link park adjoining the McReadys Creek riparian zone is proposed as part of Stage 5 (proposed Lot 902). A shared cycle and pedestrian path will be provided within this link park, which will link to the adjoining future development.

• Proposed Lot 902 will act as a buffer to the riparian vegetation and as a flood conveyance corridor in accordance with the hydraulic study.

4.1.6 Traffic and Access

The road design throughout the estate is in accordance with Council’s road hierarchy strategy (refer Mackay Level 4 Road Hierarchy report by Eppell Olsen) and in accordance the Road Hierarchy Concept plan 0166 in the accompanying Engineering Report.

Refer to the accompanying Engineering Report where issues are discussed in more detail.

4.1.7 Services Connectivity

Provision has been made with existing stages to ensure adequate capacity and connectivity for the proposed and future residential allotments. The site does not need additional permissions from downstream or adjoining owners.

Refer to the accompanying Engineering Report where issues are discussed in more detail.

4.1.8 Stormwater Quality

AECOM has prepared a Masterplan Conceptual Site Based Storm Water Management Plan (SBMP) for a large portion of the Richmond Hills development (Refer to the accompanying Engineering Report). The proposed development is included in the masterplanned SBMP catchment, which sizes and locates bio retention.

As with previous stages, it is proposed to make fair and reasonable staged cash contribution towards a regional stormwater quality system and not provide internal bio retention devices.

4.1.9 Flooding and Inundation

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 13

McReadys Creek adjoins proposed Stage 5 at the south east corner. Drainage has been provided through an open drain in Stage 5 (lot 903) to McReadys Creek as well as through the Stage 5 road network to the open space adjoining McReadys Creek

An extensive hydraulic analysis for the Richmond Hills site was undertaken as part of the existing development approvals to determine a flood strategy. The analysis concludes that there will be no detrimental impact generated on upstream or downstream properties in accordance with the recommended measures within the report (Refer accompanying Engineering Report, including the Hydraulic Flood Analysis).

Cardno Ullman and Nolan has completed a McReadys Creek Hydraulic Flood Analysis for the Richmond Hills development, which is included in the accompanying Engineering Report. Their assessment identifies no impacts on upstream or downstream properties during the Q100 Flood Event as a result of the proposed development.

The developments minimum residential levels will be above the Q100 flood event.

4.1.10 Telecommunications and Electricity

The estate will be provided with both electricity (underground) and telecommunication services. The provision of such services will be in accordance agreements from Ergon and the NBN. The design of such services will occur during civil design stage.

4.1.11 Water and Sewer

Provision has been made with previous stages that ensure adequate capacity and connectivity for the proposed residential allotments. Refer the accompanying Engineering Report for more detail.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 14

5. Planning Framework & Assessment

This section of the development assessment report explains the components of the applicable planning framework and their impacts on the proposed development. The Sustainable Planning Act Section 313 (code assessable applications) state matters or things the Assessment Manager must have regard to for apply to this application. These matters or things are now discussed.

5.1 Sustainable Planning Act 2009

The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (“SPA”) is the statutory instrument for the State of Queensland under which, amongst other matters, development applications are assessed by local governments. SPA is accompanied by the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 (SP Regs) and Planning and Environment Court Rules 2008.

5.1.1 Type of Approval Sought

The SPA provides for development approvals in the form of preliminary approvals, development permits, compliance permits and compliance certificates.

In this instance, the Applicant is seeking a Development Permit for a Reconfiguration of a Lot to undertake the proposed development. Chapter 6, Part1, Division 3, Subdivision 3 – Development Permits of the SPA states:

A development permit authorises assessable development to take place—

a) to the extent stated in the permit; and

b) subject to—

(i) the conditions of the permit; and

(ii) any preliminary approval relating to the development the permit authorises, including any conditions of the preliminary approval.

5.1.2 Level of Assessment

The local government planning framework relevant to assessing this development application at the time of lodgement comprises predominantly of the Consolidated Mackay City Planning Scheme (“the Planning Scheme”) adopted on the 13 May 2009.

Under the provisions of the Planning Scheme, the application will be subject to Code Assessment (the assessment level prescribed for a Reconfiguring a Lot in Table 5.2 of the Planning Scheme).

5.1.3 Public Notification

According to Section 295(1) of the SPA - Applicant or assessment manager to give public notice of application, applies to an application if either of the following applies –

a) any part of the application requires impact assessment; b) the application is an application to which section 242 applies.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 15

As the development application requires Code Assessment, public notification is not required in this instance.

5.1.4 Referral Agencies

Section 254 of the SPA – Jurisdiction of referral agencies for applications – generally, states that:

(1) A referral agency has, for assessing and responding to the part of an application giving rise to the referral, the jurisdiction or jurisdictions prescribed under a regulation.

Additional, Section 13 of the SPR explains that:

“For sections 250(a), 251(a) and 254(1) of the Act —

a) schedule 7, column 2 states the referral agency, and whether it is an advice agency or a concurrence agency, for the development application mentioned in column 1; and

b) schedule 7, column 3 states the jurisdiction of the referral agency mentioned in column 2.”

According to the above, the following State Government Agencies have been identified as Referral Agencies:

AGENCY TYPE TRIGGER

Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)

Concurrence Schedule 9 Item 27 - Threshold exceeded for LGA population 2.

5.1.5 Resource Entitlement

The Department of Environment band Resource Management has issued a General Authority – Evidence of resource entitlement for roads. The resource entitlement provides general authority to development applications (other than for vegetation clearing) involving local government roads. The development may impact local government roads for purposes which this entitlement is intended.

5.2 Existing Approvals / Instruments

At the time of writing, the following applications / approvals / instruments are relevant to the development application:

INSTRUMENT STAGE COMMENTS

DA 2007-536 Stages 1 - 3 Reconfiguring a Lot - Approved.

OW 2010-45 Stage 3 Operational Works - Approved.

DA 2010-191 Stage 4 Reconfiguring a Lot - Approved.

OW 2012-184 Stage 4 Operational Works - Approved.

DA 2007-543 Site B (Lot 903 on SP185586)

Material Change of Use – Preliminary Approval to override the Planning Scheme as if located in the Urban Residential Zone, McCreadys Creek Precinct. Approved.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 16

The proposed development is consistent with the existing development approvals.

5.3 Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional Plan

The site is contained within the Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday (MIW) Regional Plan Region. This plan is a statutory plan that provides strategic advice and direction and prevails over other planning instruments. In accordance with section 313 and 314 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 an Assessment Manager must assess an application against a range of matters, including a regional plan where the regional plan has not been appropriately reflected in the planning scheme. On this basis, the MIW Regional Plan (i.e. sub-regional narratives and desired regional outcomes) must be considered by the assessment manager for code and impact assessable applications. As of 12 July 2012 the MIW State planning regulatory provisions (SPRP) no longer have effect.

Urban Footprint Designation:

The proposal is for urban residential development within the Urban Footprint and is therefore consistent with the designation under the Mackay, Issac and Whitsunday Regional Plan.

In view of the above assessment, the proposed development will not compromise the intent of the Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional Plan. Therefore, the proposed development is viewed as being consistent with the main planning principles contained within this particular document.

5.4 State Planning Policies

Where not appropriately reflected in a planning scheme, State Planning Policies (SPPs) are relevant to assessing applications subject to assessment. In this regard, the Minister has identified that the following State Planning Policies (SPPs) have been appropriately reflected in the Mackay City Planning Scheme:-

• State Planning Policy 1/92 – Development and the Conservation of Agricultural Land 1.0 (SPP 1/92);

• State Planning Policy 1/02 – Development in the Vicinity of Certain Airport and Aviation Facilities 1.0 (SPP 1/02);

• State Planning Policy 2/02 – Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils 1.0 (SPP 2/02);

• State Planning Policy 1/03 – Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Flood, Bushfire & Landslide 1.0 (SPP 1/03).

Given that the above SPP’s (or component parts) have been appropriately reflected in the Consolidated Mackay City Planning Scheme, no specific consideration of these particular SPPs is required (beyond the measures contained in the Planning Scheme for these matters).

5.4.1 SPP 4/10 – Healthy Waters

The site is greater than 2,500m² and therefore the SPP is applicable to the development. As with previous stages, we propose to make a fair and reasonable cash contribution towards a regional external stormwater quality system in lieu of providing on-site Stormwater treatment devices. A detailed stormwater quality masterplan has been provided with the Accompanying Engineering report.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 17

5.5 Consolidated Mackay City Planning Scheme 2009

Land use and development within the City of Mackay is regulated by the Mackay City Planning Scheme, incorporating all amendments on and before the date of adoption. The proposal will be assessed against the following codes in accordance with the Planning Scheme:

The following sections assess the proposal against the abovementioned use codes and overlay codes of the Planning Scheme.

5.5.1 Mackay Frame Locality

According to section 5.8 of the Mackay Frame Locality Code, compliance with the Mackay Frame Locality Code is achieved when development is consistent with:

The specific outcomes for the locality (Division 7); and

• The specific outcomes for the relevant zone (Division 8-20).

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the Codes Acceptable/Probable solutions for the locality (Division 7) and the Zones (Division 10 and 13). The development is therefore consistent with the Mackay Frame Locality Code.

Particular reference is made to the following specific outcomes:

CODE TYPE CODE TITLE

LOCALITY CODE Mackay Frame Locality Code (McReadys Creek Precinct)

Urban Expansion Zone within the Mackay Frame Locality

Rural Zone within the Mackay Frame Locality

OVERLAY CODES • Bushfire Management Overlay Code • Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code • Development on Steep Land Overlay Code • Good Quality Agricultural Land Overlay Code • Landscape Character Overlay Code

DEVELOPMENT CODES • Reconfiguration of a Lot Code. • Environment and Infrastructure Code • Mackay Frame Locality Code; • Urban Expansion Zone Code within the Mackay Frame Locality

(Site A only); • Urban Residential Zone Code within the Mackay Frame Locality

(Site B only);

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 18

MACKAY FRAME LOCALITY - DIVISION 7

SPECIFIC OUTCOME ACCEPTABLE / PROBABLE SOLUTIONS

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

P5 Residential development on land zoned for residential uses, adopts or creates new traffic and transport systems which:

(i) are based on the hierarchy of roads;

(ii) are appropriate to the transport and traffic tasks required by the proposed development, having regard to its scale, intensity and character;

(iii) are linked efficiently and safely with the existing road network;

(iv) promote the safe movement of traffic,

cyclists and pedestrians throughout the development area; and

(v) minimises the potential for through traffic and local traffic conflicts and for industrial and non-industrial traffic conflicts

No Solution specified Complies The proposal accords with the Road Hierarchy Concept plan 0166 (in the accompanying Engineering Report) which takes into consideration Council’s Key Infrastructure Maps. The road hierarchy has been discussed at length with Council, with the road hierarchy plan 0166 being used in the assessment of existing approvals / applications on the land.

5.5.2 Zone Having regards to the relevant Planning Scheme Zoning Map, the subject site is included in the Urban Expansion and Rural Zones (refer Figure 2 – Zoning map).

However, for the purpose of this application, the planning scheme’s Rural Zone within Site B is overridden by the Preliminary Approval “so that any future development application on the site will be assessed as if the land is located in the Mackay Frame Locality, McReadys Creek Precinct and Urban Residential Zone”.

The proposed development is consistent with the Overall and Specific Outcomes in the Urban Expansion and Urban Residential Zones.

5.5.3 Bushfire Management Overlay Code

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the applicable Acceptable/Probable Solutions of this code and therefore each corresponding Specific Outcome.

Parts of the development include areas noted as a Medium Risk Bushfire Hazard. Residential lots will be serviced by a reticulated water service that has sufficient flow and pressure characteristics for fire fighting purposes. Also, a perimeter road and link park on the lower parts of Stage 4 will separate and buffer the higher lots.

In summary, the proposed development is consistent with the Landscape Overlay Code.

5.5.4 Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the applicable Acceptable/Probable Solutions of this code and therefore each corresponding Specific Outcome.

The development is located a significant distance from the airport. It’s proposed uses, lighting, built form, airborne emissions etc will not detrimentally impact upon the operation of the

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 19

airport or the safety of aircraft. The development does not encroach into Obstacle Limitation Surface of the airport

In summary, the proposed development is consistent with the Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code.

5.5.5 Development on Steep Land Overlay Code

Part of proposed Stage 6 includes 15-20% grades. The layout has taken grade into account, especially with regards to access. A geotechnical assessment of the site has been undertaken demonstrating the site is suitable for development (refer accompanying Engineering Report). As part of the future operational works application, a site specific geotechnical analysis will be prepared by a registered professional engineer to demonstrate that the resultant form of the development site geologically stable and will not be affected by surrounding unstable land.

The topography will be regraded to achieve the required road gradients and comply with the appropriate allotment grading/geotechnical requirements. General earthworks and/or retaining walls may be utilized to effect this.

Furthermore, future dwellings on steep land will trigger the need for a Material Change of Use application demonstrating how the building and other works will ensure a very low classification of risk.

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the applicable Acceptable/Probable Solutions of this code and therefore each corresponding Specific Outcome.

5.5.6 Landscape Overlay Code

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the applicable Acceptable/Probable Solutions of this code and therefore each corresponding Specific Outcome.

The overlay affects a small strip of land well away from the residential development.

In summary, the proposed development is consistent with the Landscape Overlay Code.

5.5.7 Good Quality Agricultural Land Overlay Code

The overlay shows parts of the site contains Good Quality Agricultural Land. The residential activity areas are appropriately separated from the balance agricultural uses.

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the applicable Acceptable/Probable Solutions of this code and therefore each corresponding Specific Outcome.

In summary, the proposed development is consistent with the Good Quality Agricultural Land Overlay Code.

5.5.8 Reconfiguration of a Lot Code

The proposed development achieves compliance with Overall Outcomes of the code.

Particular reference is made to the following specific outcomes:

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 20

RECONFIGURATION OF A LOT CODE

SPECIFIC OUTCOME ACCEPTABLE / PROBABLE SOLUTIONS

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

LOT AREAS AND DIMENSIONS

P2. Each lot is consistent with the minimum area and dimensions as set out in Table 9-19.1 Minimum Area & Dimensions.

Table 9-19.1 Minimum Area & Dimensions Zones Area Frontage Depth

Rural 100 ha Rural Residential 1 ha 60m 60m Urban Residential Minimum 300m2

Average 500m2 10m 30m

Higher Density Residential

800m2 20m 35m

Village 1000m2 20m 40m City Centre Zones No minimum area or dimension specified Commercial No minimum area or dimension specified

Industry (Low Impact) 1,000m2 25m 35m Industry (High

Impact) 2,000m2 30m 60m

Public Purposes No minimum area or dimension specified Sport & Recreation No minimum area or dimension specified Open Space No minimum area or dimension specified Special Activities No minimum area or dimension specified

quality objectives for the waters

any relevant ground water protection plan;

No solution specified

Complies NOTE: (the following assessment is as if in the Urban Res zone). Lot 257 (stage 7) does not comply with minimum front requirements, however the intent of this code is to assess against provision P5 – Battleaxe Lots.

P4. Irregular shaped lots are designed to have: (i) a frontage to depth ratio of no more than 1:3; (ii) for land in the Urban Residential Zone: a minimum frontage of 10m to any cul-de-sac road or along any curved road alignment; and an area within the lot with the minimum dimensions of 15 by 15m; and (iii) for land in the Higher Density Residential Zone, a minimum width of 20m at a point 6 m in the lot parallel to the longest road frontage.

No solution specified

Complies NOTE: (the following assessment is as if in the Urban Res zone). NOTE: Lot 257 (stage 7) does not comply with minimum front requirements, however the intent of this code is to assess against provision P5 – Battleaxe Lots.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 21

P5. Battleaxe lots do not occur in any proposal for reconfiguring a lot that creates more than 1 additional lot. Battleaxe lots are provided only where: (i) there is no increase in the density that is applicable to the zone that the subject land is included in; (ii) the lot handle is not less than 5m in width; (iii) both sides of the lot handle are landscaped for the full length of the handle; (iv) the maximum length of the lot handle is not greater than the minimum depth specified in Table 9-18.1 Minimum Area and Dimensions; (v) the area of the lot handle is not included in the calculation of the area of the lot for minimum area purposes; and (vi) for land in the Urban Residential Zone, two adjacent lots have a combined frontage of 50% of the minimum road frontage for a single lot, and a common access drive is provided between the kerb and the head of the access handle.

No solution specified

NOTE: (the following assessment is as if in the Urban Res zone). This provision applies to Lot 257 (stage 7) and is outdated since it has been overridden several times since it was introduced. Lot 257 (stage 7) access and services can be provided within the access handle. The configuration of the lot includes a significant area that easily provides for a dwelling house.

OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS

P1 In residential, commercial and industrial areas, public open space is provided as part of development involving reconfiguration of a lot: (i) as part of a linked open space system for safe pedestrian and cycling paths linking centres; (ii) in a location, size and shape to satisfy the local, district or regional recreational needs of the community; and (iii) to have a multi-functional role such as for stormwater management or fauna habitat. Note: Guidelines for complying with Council information requirements is detailed in the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy

S1 The provision and design of open space complies with the requirements of the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy and the Parks Contributions Planning Scheme Policy

Complies Open Space has been masterplanned. Refer s 4.1.3 of the report.

In summary, the proposed development is consistent with the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code.

5.5.9 Environment and Infrastructure Code

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the applicable Acceptable/Probable Solutions of this code and therefore each corresponding Specific Outcome.

The proposal is appropriately sited within urban zoned land. Accordingly, the development will be required to incorporate WSUD principles. All infrastructure will be readily available to the site, as described in previous sections of this planning report. Residential development will be above the DFE and the development will not detrimentally impact upon upstream or downstream properties in accordance with the Cardno Ullman and Nolan Hydraulic Study.

In summary, the proposed development is consistent with the Environment and Infrastructure Code.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 22

6. Recommendations

This Assessment Report (and supporting application material) has demonstrated that the proposed development complies with the intent of the Mackay City Planning Scheme (as amended 13 May 2009).

In particular, the proposed development:

• Complies with the intent of the sites Urban Expansion zone for that part of the development within the Urban Expansion Zone; and

• Complies with the intent of the Urban Residential zone for that part of the development within the Rural Zone, in accordance with the existing Preliminary Material Change of Use approval,

• Complies with all of the applicable Mackay City Planning Scheme provisions;

• Complies with relevant state regulatory codes / instruments

• Has efficient and effective access to the existing road network and other urban infrastructure including reticulated water, sewerage, electricity and telecommunications.

In conclusion, based upon the planning assessment of the proposed development against the provisions of the SPA, Regional Plan (non-statutory), relevant State Planning Policies and the Mackay City Planning Scheme, it is recommended that the Mackay Regional Council approves the development application, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions.

Yours faithfully

POINTGLEN DEVELOPMENTS

PAUL THOMPSON

DEVELOPMENT MANAGER

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 23

APPENDICES

Appendix

A FOR APPROVAL: Plan/s of Development

Appendix

B

Owners Consent & IDAS Forms

Appendix

C Current Title Search, Registered Survey Plan/s and Smart Map

Appendix

D EMR and CLR search

Appendix

E Park Agreement and Plan RIC0191 (5 sheets) and Council AICN email

Appendix

F Remnant Vegetation Mapping

Appendix

G Masterplan Layout

Appendix

H Existing Infrastructure within Easements

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (ATTACHED / ENCLOSED)

Engineering Report

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 24

AP

PE

ND

IX

A

FOR APPROVAL:

Plan/s of Development

Note: Approval is sought for only these documents unless otherwise expressly permitted by the applicant.

CRESTRIDGE AVE

OAKVIEW ST

GRANGEWOOD AVE

REGENT AVE

GLENOAK AVE

EAGLEFORD ST

PARKEDGE

AVE

JANMAC CT

McCREADYS

CREEK

STAGE 5

906 (PART)3.672Ha TOTAL

EMT J SP256548

GRANGEWOOD AVE

EMT 'F' SP252778(TRUNK WATER MAIN)

BALANCE OFEMT 'E' SP165721

(TRUNK WATER MAIN)

EMT H SP2522779 (TRUNK SEWER MAIN)

906 (PART)

EMT H SP2522779 (TRUNK SEWER MAIN)

STAGE 7STAGE 6

LOT CALCULATIONSSTAGE RES. LOTS

6 407 44

TOTAL: 84

15 150 30 45 60 75m

1:1500 - A1 1:3000 - A3

79 Phillip StreetPO Box 8158Mt Pleasant Q 4740

Ph: (07) 4968 0000 Fax: (07) 4942 4648 email: [email protected]

C

t:\Job

s\500

5-ric

hmon

d hills

\RIC

06\D

rawi

ngs\0

238 -

Stag

es 6

& 7 P

ropo

sal P

lans\5

005.0

530-

0238

Stag

es 6

& 7 P

ropo

sal P

lan.dw

gDA

TE P

LOTT

ED: 1

5 Apr

il 201

3 9:02

AM

BY

: BRE

NDAN

A. V

ASSA

LLO

IMPORTANT NOTE:EASEMENTS AND PROPOSED CIVIL WORKS SHOWN ARE INDICATIVE ONLY &SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL WORKS APPROVAL.FINAL LOT DESIGN, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENTAPPROVALS AND FINAL SURVEY.THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HERE-ON HAVE NOT BEEN MARKED AT THE TIME OFPREPARATION OF THIS PLAN.

35.4

30.0

20.5

20.520.5

20.520.5

22.7

21.0

35.75

23.0

18.5

42.5

42.5

20.047.8

18.5

18.0

18.5

18.5

35.0

19.0

32.2

5.7

15.1

15.0

9.5

32.0

39.3

20.721.0

35.0

18.1

23.0

15.8

16.8

19.013.9

17.517.5

19.020.0

14.9

15.2

22.029.0

35.0

14.2

35.75

34.7

22.5

31.7

16.0

35.3

35.3

3.4

32.0

31.0

36.7

7.5

33.7

35.0

18.6

32.0

35.0

41.2

35.0

20.5

14.5

21.0

20.521.1

21.0

21.0

20.0

20.5

21.0

21.021.0

33.9

20.0

35.8

30.0

20.0

3.7

6.312.5

12.5

12.3

5.0

14.421.5

16.6

5.8

31.0

22.8

9.9

12.2

31.0

10.3

11.6

5.8

4.4

8.9

37.6

12.9

5.531.0

19.0

5.7

18.7

31.0

20.0

5.7

31.8

5.7

29.0

14.5

18.5

33.0

14.7

35.0

47.8

24.0

35.8

18.5

37.6

21.020.5

20.020.0

21.0

8.7

15.5

7.0

12.5

19.0

35.0

35.0

5.7

13.5

13.5

13.5

15.0

19.5

6.3

35.0

15.0

11.9

22.0

7.0

17.0

35.0

16.6

5.0

248 261

256

267

253

265 271

276

269

277

272

279

274

281

275

285

234

236

237

244

245

247

250

225

228

227

231

230

235

233

232

226

257

229

254

251

238

260

259

252

246

249

266

262

263

255

264268

273

278

280

270

284

286

282

258

718m²

718m²

718m²

718m²

718m²

786m²

718m²

718m²

735m²

807m²

669m²

797m²

661m²

675m²

721m²

1100m²

728m²

726m²

820m²

777m²

665m²

665m²

613m²

613m²

665m²

700m²712m²

735m²

718m²

718m²

739m²700m²

607m²

650m²

644m²

661m²

661m²

655m²

784m²

726m²

884m²

653m²

930m²849m²752m²760m²

884m²

653m²

803m²

735m²

736m²

748m²

715m²

715m²

751m²

712m²

706m²

786m²

786m²

McCREADYS CREEKEAGLEFORD ST

18.5

EMT J SP256548902 (PARK)

0.438Ha

GRANGEWOOD AVE

POSSIBLE REAR LOT DRAIN

SEE DETAIL 1 ONDWG C004

POSSIBLESEWER &

DRAINAGE EMT

EMT 'F' SP252778(TRUNK WATER MAIN)

BALANCE OFEMT 'E' SP165721

(TRUNK WATER MAIN)

EMT H SP2522779 (TRUNK SEWER MAIN)

A-

906 (PART)

99

989192

979594 96

48

93

SP 255642

STAGE 7

STAGE 6

33.0

35.0

7.57.5 0 15 22.5 30 37.5m

1:750 - A1 1:1500 - A3

79 Phillip StreetPO Box 8158Mt Pleasant Q 4740

Ph: (07) 4968 0000 Fax: (07) 4942 4648 email: [email protected]

C

t:\Job

s\500

5-ric

hmon

d hills

\RIC

06\D

rawi

ngs\0

238 -

Stag

es 6

& 7 P

ropo

sal P

lans\5

005.0

530-

0238

Stag

es 6

& 7 P

ropo

sal P

lan.dw

gDA

TE P

LOTT

ED: 1

5 Apr

il 201

3 9:02

AM

BY

: BRE

NDAN

A. V

ASSA

LLO

IMPORTANT NOTE:EASEMENTS AND PROPOSED CIVIL WORKS SHOWN ARE INDICATIVE ONLY &SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL WORKS APPROVAL.FINAL LOT DESIGN, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENTAPPROVALS AND FINAL SURVEY.THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HERE-ON HAVE NOT BEEN MARKED AT THE TIME OFPREPARATION OF THIS PLAN.

19.6

13.1

30.6

18.5

8.2

23.0

9.1

18.518.5

18.518.5

19.5

17.9

20.0 20.5 20.5 20.520.0

19.7

38.7

35.0

35.0

20.520.5

20.520.5

22.7

59.1

35.0

35.0

29.3

28.5

19.0

45.0

36.529.0

10.418.8

15.0

20.5

13.8

5.7

15.1

42.4

37.4

15.010.0

19.013.9

17.517.5

19.020.0

14.9

15.2

29.014.2

3.4

36.7

35.0

18.6

35.0

35.0

20.5

14.5

21.0

20.521.1

21.020.5

21.021.0

4.4

37.6

31.031.0

5.4

5.7

31.2

18.7

35.0

17.13.9

3.9

31.0

15.5

4.7

20.5

41.3

6.2

20.0

20.0

20.1

40.8

27.6

21.020.5

20.020.0

35.0

5.7

16.0

3.0

46.4

13.5

15.0

15.015.

0

18.5

38.3

15.0

35.0

15.0

35.0

5.7

35.0

16.636.

0

7.2

5.7

13.4

3.8 36.1

35.9

159

160 164

212

206

213

224

248

234

236

237

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

247

250

203157

202

163161

211

165

205

162

219

207

216

209

214

208

210

221

220

204

225

228

227

217

215

223

218 231

222

230

235

233

232

226

229

251

238

246

249

156

1081m²

734m²

706m²

717m²

683m²

648m²

785m²

755m²

963m²

683m²

828m²

795m²

1063m²718m²700m² 718m²718m²

1061m²648m²

648m²

648m²

648m²700m² 718m²

718m²735m²

735m² 718m²

718m²735m²

692m² 786m²

718m²

718m²

735m²

669m²

797m²

777m²

665m²

665m²

613m²

613m²

665m²

700m²712m²

735m²

718m²

718m²

739m²700m²

GRANGEWOOD AVE

POSSIBLESEWER &

DRAINAGE EMT

EMT 'F' SP252778(TRUNK WATER MAIN)

BALANCE OFEMT 'E' SP165721

(TRUNK WATER MAIN)

A-

906 (PART)42

44 45

65

46

4964 66

4347 48

S P 2 5 5 6 4 2

S P 2 5 5 6 4 2SP 255642

SP 255642

STAGE 6

35.0

//

//

/PR

OPER

TYBO

UNDA

RY

PROP

ERTY

BOUN

DARY

EXIS

TING

Ø300 WATER MAIN

FUTURE ROAD RESERVE & CARRIAGEWAY (25.0m) STAGE 7

6.5 12.0 6.5

FUTURE LOT TO FRONT DAWSON BLVD

1.8

79 Phillip StreetPO Box 8158Mt Pleasant Q 4740

Ph: (07) 4968 0000 Fax: (07) 4942 4648 email: [email protected]

C

t:\Job

s\500

5-ric

hmon

d hills

\RIC

06\D

rawi

ngs\0

238 -

Stag

es 6

& 7 P

ropo

sal P

lans\5

005.0

530-

0238

Stag

es 6

& 7 P

ropo

sal P

lan.dw

gDA

TE P

LOTT

ED: 1

5 Apr

il 201

3 9:02

AM

BY

: BRE

NDAN

A. V

ASSA

LLO

IMPORTANT NOTE:EASEMENTS AND PROPOSED CIVIL WORKS SHOWN ARE INDICATIVE ONLY &SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL WORKS APPROVAL.FINAL LOT DESIGN, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENTAPPROVALS AND FINAL SURVEY.THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HERE-ON HAVE NOT BEEN MARKED AT THE TIME OFPREPARATION OF THIS PLAN.

7.57.5 0 15 22.5 30 37.5m

1:1500 - A3

1.00.5 0 0.5 2.01.5 2.5m

1:100 - A3

GRANGEWOOD AVE

REGENT AVE

CRESTRIDGE AVE

GLENOAK AVE

EAGLEFORD ST

OAKVIEW ST

PARKEDGE

AVE

JANMAC CT

McCREADYS

CREEK

STAGE5

STAGE7

906 (PART)3.699Ha TOTAL

EMT J SP256548

EMT H SP2522779

GRANGEWOOD AVE

EMT 'F'SP252778

BALANCE OFEMT 'E'

SP165721

LOT CALCULATIONSSTAGE No. LOTS

5 486 407 44

TOTAL: 132

NOTE ON STAGING & BALANCE LAND� ONE OF MORE STAGES MAY BE DEVELOPED AT ANY ONE TIME.� THIS PLAN SHOWS A FINAL BALANCE LAND LAYOUT . A LOGICAL INTERMEDIATE

BALANCE LAND LAYOUT WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF PLAN SEALING

15 150 30 45 60 75m

1:1500 - A1 1:3000 - A3

79 Phillip StreetPO Box 8158Mt Pleasant Q 4740

Ph: (07) 4968 0000 Fax: (07) 4942 4648 email: [email protected]

C

T:\Jo

bs\50

05-R

ichmo

nd H

ills\R

IC05

\Dra

wing

s\023

5 - S

tages

5 - 7

Stag

ing P

lans\5

005.0

430-

0235

Stag

ing.dw

gDA

TE P

LOTT

ED: 8

Apr

il 201

3 11:3

1 AM

BY

: BRE

NDAN

A. V

ASSA

LLO

IMPORTANT NOTE:EASEMENTS AND PROPOSED CIVIL WORKS SHOWN ARE INDICATIVE ONLY &SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL WORKS APPROVAL.FINAL LOT DESIGN, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENTAPPROVALS AND FINAL SURVEY.THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HERE-ON HAVE NOT BEEN MARKED AT THE TIME OFPREPARATION OF THIS PLAN.

PROVINCE COURT

NO

TTIN

GH

AM

PLA

CE

HA

RWIC

K CO

URT

SILK

YOA

K PL

ACE

GRANGEWOOD AVE

ADINA COURT

WATERCREST COURT

Additional names if above names are not approved

Kingston

Yorkshire

Eastbark

PERON

COU

RT

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 25

AP

PE

ND

IX

B

Owners Consent and

IDAS Forms

IDAS form 1—Application details (Sustainable Planning Act 2009 version 2.0 effective 31 March 2013)

This form must be used for ALL development applications.

You MUST complete ALL questions that are stated to be a mandatory requirement unless otherwise identified on this form.

For all development applications, you must:

complete this form (IDAS form 1—Application details)

complete any other forms relevant to your application

provide any mandatory supporting information identified on the forms as being required to accompany your application.

Attach extra pages if there is insufficient space on this form.

All terms used on this form have the meaning given in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 or the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009.

This form and any other IDAS form relevant to your application must be used for development applications relating to strategic port land and Brisbane core port land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and airport land under the Airport Assets (Restructuring and Disposal) Act 2008. Whenever a planning scheme is mentioned, take it to mean land use plan for the strategic port land, Brisbane core port land or airport land.

PLEASE NOTE: This form is not required to accompany requests for compliance assessment.

This form can also be completed online using eDA at www.smarteda.qld.gov.au

Mandatory requirements

Applicant details (Note: the applicant is the person responsible for making the application and need not be the owner of the land. The applicant is responsible for ensuring the information provided on all IDAS application forms is correct. Any development permit or preliminary approval that may be issued as a consequence of this application will be issued to the applicant.)

Name/s (individual or company name in full) Pointglen Developments Pty Ltd

For companies, contact name Paul Thompson

Postal address PO Box 8158

Suburb Mt Pleasant

State Qld Postcode 4740

Country (if other than Australia)

Contact phone number 07 4968 0000

Mobile number (non-mandatory requirement) 0407 531 499

Fax number (non-mandatory requirement)

e-mail address (non-mandatory requirement) [email protected]

Applicant’s reference number (non-mandatory requirement)

1. What is the nature of the development proposed and what type of approval is being sought?

Table A—Aspect 1 of the application (If there are additional aspects to the application please list in Table B—Aspect 2.)

a) What is the nature of the development? (Please only tick one box.)

Material change of use

Reconfiguring a lot Building work Operational work

b) What is the approval type? (Please only tick one box.)

Preliminary approval

under s241 of SPA

Preliminary approval

under s241 and s242 of SPA

Development

permit

c) Provide a brief description of the proposal, including use definition and number of buildings or structures where applicable (e.g. six unit apartment building defined as a multi-unit dwelling, 30 lot residential subdivision etc.)

Reconfiguring a Lot to create Stages 6 and 7 of an estate. 3 existing lots into a total of 84 residential lots and 3 balance lots. To be subdivided in stages and in accordance with the attached Plan of Development.

d) What is the level of assessment? (Please only tick one box.)

Impact assessment

Code assessment

Table B—Aspect 2 of the application (If there are additional aspects to the application please list in Table C—Additional aspects of the application.)

a) What is the nature of development? (Please only tick one box.)

Material change of use

Reconfiguring a lot Building work Operational work

b) What is the approval type? (Please only tick one box.)

Preliminary approval

under s241 of SPA

Preliminary approval

under s241 and s242 of SPA

Development

permit

c) Provide a brief description of the proposal, including use definition and number of buildings or structures where applicable (e.g. six unit apartment building defined as a multi-unit dwelling, 30 lot residential subdivision etc.)

d) What is the level of assessment?

Impact assessment

Code assessment

3 Application details—IDAS form 1 Version 2.0 31 March 2013

Table C—Additional aspects of the application (If there are additional aspects to the application please list in a separate table on an extra page and attach to this form.)

Refer attached schedule

Not required

2. Location of the premises (Complete Table E and/or Table F as applicable. Identify each lot in a separate row.)

Table E—Street address and lot on plan for the premises or street address and lot on plan for the land adjoining or adjacent to the premises. (Note: this table is to be used for applications involving taking or interfering with water). (Attach a separate schedule if there is insufficient space in this table.)

Street address and lot on plan (All lots must be listed.)

Street address and lot on plan for the land adjoining or adjacent to the premises (Appropriate for development in water but adjoining or adjacent to land, e.g. jetty, pontoon. All lots must be listed)

Street address Lot on plan description

Local government area (e.g. Logan, Cairns)

Lot Unit no.

Street no.

Street name and official suburb/ locality name

Post-code

Lot no. Plan type and plan no.

i) Boveys Road, Richmond

4740 903 SP185586 Mackay Regional Council

ii) Grangewood Ave, Richmond

4740 905 SP255642 Mackay Regional Council

iii) Richmond 4740 1 RP714389 Mackay Regional Council

Planning scheme details (If the premises involves multiple zones, clearly identify the relevant zone/s for each lot in a separate row in the below table. Non-mandatory.)

Lot Applicable zone/precinct Applicable local plan/precinct Applicable overlay/s

i) Rural and Urban Expansion McReadys Creek Precinct Bushfire Management Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Development on Steep Land Good Quality Agricultural Land

Landscape Character

ii) Urban Expansion McReadys Creek Precinct Bushfire Management Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Development on Steep Land Good Quality Agricultural Land Landscape Character

iii) Urban Expansion McReadys Creek Precinct Bushfire Management Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Good Quality Agricultural Land

Table F—Premises coordinates (Appropriate for development in remote areas, over part of a lot or in water not adjoining or adjacent to land e.g. channel dredging in Moreton Bay.) (Attach a separate schedule if there is insufficient space in this table.)

Integrated Development Application System form

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning PO Box 15009 City East Qld 4002 tel 13 QGOV (13 74 68) [email protected]

www.dsdip.qld.gov.au

Coordinates (Note: place each set of coordinates in a separate row.)

Zone reference

Datum Local government area (if applicable)

Easting Northing Latitude Longitude

GDA94

WGS84

other

3. Total area of the premises on which the development is proposed (indicate square metres)

489180 m² or 48.918 Hectares

4. Current use/s of the premises (e.g. vacant land, house, apartment building, cane farm etc.)

Agriculture – cane farming and grazing

5. Are there any current approvals (e.g. a preliminary approval) associated with this application? (Non-mandatory requirement.)

No Yes—provide details below

List of approval reference/s Date approved (dd/mm/yy) Date approval lapses (dd/mm/yy)

DA-2007-543 20 July 2010 20 July 2014

6. Is owner’s consent required for this application? (Refer to notes at the end of this form for more information.)

No

Yes—complete either Table G, Table H or Table I as applicable

Table G

Name of owner/s of the land Illuka Investments P/L A.C.N. 106 737 151

I/We, the above-mentioned owner/s of the land, consent to the making of this application.

Signature of owner/s of the land

Date

Table H

Name of owner/s of the land

The owner’s written consent is attached or will be provided separately to the assessment manager

Table I

Name of owner/s of the land

By making this application, I, the applicant, declare that the owner has given written consent to the making of the

application.

Integrated Development Application System form

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning PO Box 15009 City East Qld 4002 tel 13 QGOV (13 74 68) [email protected]

www.dsdip.qld.gov.au

7. Does the application involve a state resource? (E.g. the application involves taking water or quarry material, or interfering with the flow of water. Refer to the notes at the end of this form for more information) (Non-mandatory requirement.)

No Not identified whether or not the application involves a State resource

Yes—complete Table J

Table J

Nature of state-owned resource (if identified)

8. Identify if any of the following apply to the premises (Tick applicable box/es.)

Adjacent to a water body, watercourse or aquifer (e.g. creek, river, lake, canal)—complete Table K

On strategic port land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994—complete Table L

In a tidal water area—complete Table M

On Brisbane core port land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (no table requires completion)

On airport land under the Airport Assets (Restructuring and Disposal) Act 2008 (no table requires completion)

Table K

Name of water body, watercourse or aquifer:

Table L

Lot on plan description for strategic port land Port authority for the lot

Table M

Name of local government for the tidal area (if applicable) Port authority for the tidal area (if applicable)

9. Are there any existing easements on the premises? (e.g. for vehicular access, electricity, overland flow, water etc.)

No Yes—ensure the type, location and dimension of each easement is included in the plans submitted

10. Does the proposal include new building work or operational work on the premises? (Including any services.)

No Yes—ensure the nature, location and dimension of proposed works are included in plans submitted

11. Is the payment of a portable long service leave levy applicable to this application? (Refer to notes at the end of this form for more information.)

Integrated Development Application System form

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning PO Box 15009 City East Qld 4002 tel 13 QGOV (13 74 68) [email protected]

www.dsdip.qld.gov.au

No—go to question 13 Yes

12. Has the portable long service leave levy been paid? (Refer to notes at the end of this form for more information.)

No

Yes—complete Table N and submit with this application the yellow local government/private certifier’s copy of the receipted QLeave form

Table N

Amount paid Date paid

(dd/mm/yy)

QLeave project number (6 digit number starting with A, B, E, L or P)

13. Has the local government agreed to apply a superseded planning scheme to this application under section 96 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009?

No

Yes—please provide details below

Name of local government Date of written notice given by local government (dd/mm/yy)

Reference number of written notice given by local government (if applicable)

14. List below all of the forms and supporting information that accompany this application (Include all IDAS forms, checklists, mandatory supporting information etc. that will be submitted as part of this application. Note: this question does not apply for applications made online using eDA.)

Description of attachment or title of attachment Method of lodgement to assessment manager

Planning Report and accompanying documentation / reports Digital (Smart EdA)

Plan of Development 0238 (enclosed in Planning Report) Digital (Smart EdA)

IDAS Form 1 - General Digital (Smart EdA)

IDAS Form 7 - RoL Digital (Smart EdA)

15. Applicant’s declaration

By making this application, I declare that all information in this application is true and correct (Note: it is unlawful to

provide false or misleading information.)

Notes for completing this form

Section 261 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 prescribes when an application is a properly-made application. Note, the assessment manager has discretion to accept an application as properly made despite any non-

Integrated Development Application System form

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning PO Box 15009 City East Qld 4002 tel 13 QGOV (13 74 68) [email protected]

www.dsdip.qld.gov.au

compliance with the requirement to provide mandatory supporting information under section 260(1)(c) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009

. Applicant details

Where the applicant is not a natural person, ensure the applicant entity is a real legal entity. Question 1

Schedule 3 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 identifies assessable development and the type of assessment. Where schedule 3 identifies assessable development as “various aspects of development” the applicant must identify each aspect of the development on Tables A, B and C respectively and as required.

Question 6

Section 263 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 sets out when the consent of the owner of the land is required for an application. Section 260(1)(e) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 provides that if the owner’s consent is required under section 263, then an application must contain, or be accompanied by, the written consent of the owner, or include a declaration by the applicant that the owner has given written consent to the making of the application. If a development application relates to a state resource, the application is not required to be supported by evidence of resource entitlement. However, where owner's consent to the application is required under section 263, and the State is the owner of the subject land, the written consent of the state as landowner will be required. Some departments, such as the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, have specific requirements for applying for owners consent. Allocation or entitlement to the state resource is a separate process and will need to be obtained before development commences.

Question 7

If a development application involves a state resource, the application is not required to be supported by evidence of resource entitlement. The allocation or entitlement to the resource is a separate process and should be obtained prior to development commencing.

Question 11

The Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Act 1991 prescribes when the portable long service leave levy is payable.

The portable long service leave levy amount and other prescribed percentages and rates for calculating the levy are prescribed in the Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Regulation 2002.

Question 12

The portable long service leave levy need not be paid when the application is made, but the Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Act 1991 requires the levy to be paid before a development permit is issued.

Building and construction industry notification and payment forms are available from any Queensland post office or agency, on request from QLeave, or can be completed on the QLeave website at www.qleave.qld.gov.au. For further information contact QLeave on 1800 803 481 or visit www.qleave.qld.gov.au.

Privacy—The information collected in this form will be used by the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP), assessment manager, referral agency and/or building certifier in accordance with the processing and assessment of your application. Your personal details will not be disclosed for a purpose outside of the IDAS process, except where required by legislation (including the Right to Information Act 2009) or as required by Parliament. This information may be stored in relevant databases. The information collected will be retained as required by the Public Records Act 2002.

OFFICE USE ONLY

Date received Reference numbers

NOTIFICATION OF ENGAGEMENT OF A PRIVATE CERTIFIER

To Council. I have been engaged as the private certifier for the building work referred to in this application

Date of engagement Name BSA Certification license number

Building classification/s

Integrated Development Application System form

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning PO Box 15009 City East Qld 4002 tel 13 QGOV (13 74 68) [email protected]

www.dsdip.qld.gov.au

QLEAVE NOTIFICATION AND PAYMENT (For completion by assessment manager or private certifier if applicable.)

Description of the work QLeave project number

Amount paid ($)

Date paid

Date receipted form sighted by assessment manager

Name of officer who sighted the form

The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is administered by the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning. This form and all other required application materials should be sent to your assessment manager and any referral agencies.

1 IDAS form 7—Reconfiguring a lot Version 2.1 1 April 2013

IDAS form 7—Reconfiguring a lot (Sustainable Planning Act 2009 version 2.1 effective 1 April 2013)

This form must be used for development applications or requests for compliance assessment for reconfiguring a lot.

You MUST complete ALL questions that are stated to be a mandatory requirement unless otherwise identified on this form.

For all development applications, you must: complete IDAS form 1—Application details complete any other forms relevant to your application provide any mandatory supporting information identified on the forms as being required to accompany your

application.

For requests for compliance assessment, you must also complete IDAS form 32 – Compliance Assessment. Attach extra pages if there is insufficient space on this form.

All terms used on this form have the meaning given in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 or the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009.

This form can also be completed online using eDA at www.smarteda.qld.gov.au

Mandatory requirements

1. What is the total number of existing lots making up the premises? 3

2. What is the nature of the lot reconfiguration? (Tick applicable box/es.)

subdivision—complete questions 3 – 6 and 11

boundary realignment—complete questions 8, 9 and 11 creating an easement giving access to a lot from a constructed road—complete questions 10 and 11 dividing land into parts by agreement—please provide details below and complete questions 7 and 11

3. Within the subdivision, what is the number of additional lots being created and their intended final use?

Intended final use of new lots Residential Commercial Industrial Other—specify

Number of additional lots created

84 3 Balance lots

2 IDAS form 7—Reconfiguring a lot Version 2.1 1 April 2013

4. What type of approval is being sought for the subdivision?

Development permit

Preliminary approval Compliance assessment

5. Are there any current approvals associated with this subdivision application? (E.g. material change of use.)

No Yes—provide details below

List of approval reference/s Date approved (dd/mm/yy) Date approval lapses (dd/mm/yy)

DA-2007-543 20 July 2010 20 July 2014

6. Does the proposal involve multiple stages?

No—complete Table A Yes—complete Table B

Table A

a) What is the total length of any new road to be constructed? (metres)

b) What is the total area of land to be contributed for community purposes? (square metres)

c) Does the proposal involve the construction of a canal or artificial waterway?

No Yes

d) Does the proposal involve operational work for the building of a retaining wall?

No Yes

Table B (Stage 6) —complete a new Table B for every stage if the application involves more than one stage

a) What is the proposed estate name? (if known and if applicable) Richmond Hills

b) What stage in the development does this table refer to? Stage 6

c) Will the development permit being sought for this stage result in additional residential lots? (only applicable if a development permit is being sought)

No Yes—specify the total number 40 lots

d) What is the total area of land for this stage? (square metres) 37910 m²

e) What is the total length of any new road to be constructed at this stage? (metres) 547 m

f) What is the total area of land to be contributed for community purposes at this stage? (square metres)

g) Does the proposal involve the construction of a canal or artificial waterway?

No Yes

h) Does the proposal involve operational work for the building of a retaining wall?

No Yes

3 IDAS form 7—Reconfiguring a lot Version 2.1 1 April 2013

Table B (Stage 7) —complete a new Table B for every stage if the application involves more than one stage

a) What is the proposed estate name? (if known and if applicable) Richmond Hills

b) What stage in the development does this table refer to? Stage 7

c) Will the development permit being sought for this stage result in additional residential lots? (only applicable if a development permit is being sought)

No Yes—specify the total number 44 lots

d) What is the total area of land for this stage? (square metres) 39570 m²

e) What is the total length of any new road to be constructed at this stage? (metres) 442 m

f) What is the total area of land to be contributed for community purposes at this stage? (square metres)

g) Does the proposal involve the construction of a canal or artificial waterway?

No Yes

h) Does the proposal involve operational work for the building of a retaining wall?

No Yes

7. Lease/agreement details—how many parts are being created and what is their intended final use?

Intended final use of new parts Residential Commercial Industrial Other—specify

Number of additional parts created

8. What are the current and proposed dimensions following the boundary realignment for each lot forming the premises?

Current lot Proposed lot

Lot plan description Area (square metres)

Length of road frontage Lot number Area (square metres)

Length of road frontage

9. What is the reason for the boundary realignment?

10. What are the dimensions and nature of the proposed easement? (If there are more than two easements proposed please list in a separate table on an extra page and attach to this form.)

Width (m) Length (m) Purpose of the easement (e.g. pedestrian access)?

Entity favoured by the easement

11. Confirm that the following mandatory supporting information accompanies this application

Mandatory supporting information Confirmation of lodgement

Method of lodgement

4 IDAS form 7—Reconfiguring a lot Version 2.1 1 April 2013

All applications for reconfiguring a lot

Site plans drawn to an appropriate scale (1:100, 1:200 or 1:500 are the recommended scales) which show the following: the location and site area of the land to which the application relates

(relevant land) the north point the boundaries of the relevant land any road frontages of the relevant land, including the name of the road the contours and natural ground levels of the relevant land the location of any existing buildings or structures on the relevant land the allotment layout showing existing lots, any proposed lots (including

the dimensions of those lots), existing or proposed road reserves, building envelopes and existing or proposed open space (note: numbering is required for all lots)

any drainage features over the relevant land, including any watercourse, creek, dam, waterhole or spring and any land subject to a Q100 flood event

any existing or proposed easements on the relevant land and their function

all existing and proposed roads and access points on the relevant land any existing or proposed car parking areas on the relevant land the location of any proposed retaining walls on the relevant land and

their height the location of any stormwater detention on the relevant land the location and dimension of any land dedicated for community

purposes the final intended use of any new lots.

Confirmed

A statement about how the proposed development addresses the local government’s planning schemes and any other planning documents relevant to the application.

Confirmed

For an application involving assessable development in a wild river declaration

Documentation that: describes how the activity to which the application relates is not

prohibited development under Schedule 3 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and

demonstrates how the proposed activity will meet the requirements set out in the relevant wild river declaration and Wild Rivers Code.

Confirmed Not applicable

A map showing the proposed location of the activity in relation to wild river management areas and nominated waterways (a map may be produced digitally at http://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/wildrivers/wildrivers-map.php).

Confirmed Not applicable

Notes for completing this form For supporting information requirements for requests for compliance assessment, please refer to the relevant

matters for which compliance assessment will be carried out against. To avoid an action notice, it is recommended that you provide as much of the mandatory information listed in this form as possible.

Privacy—Please refer to your assessment manager, referral agency and/or building certifier for further details on the use of information recorded in this form.

OFFICE USE ONLY

5 IDAS form 7—Reconfiguring a lot Version 2.1 1 April 2013

Date received Reference numbers The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is administered by the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning. This form and all other required application materials should be sent to your assessment manager and any referral agencies.

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning PO Box 15009 City East Qld 4002 tel 13 QGOV (13 74 68) [email protected] www.dsdip.qld.gov.au

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 26

AP

PE

ND

IX

C

Current Title Search, Registered Survey Plan/s and Smart Map

LAND TITLE ACT 1994

REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION STATEMENT

DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES, QUEENSLAND

Title Reference : 50585755

This is the current status of the title as at 09:45 on 14/08/2012

REGISTERED OWNER

Dealing No: 709244534 22/12/2005

ILLUKA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD A.C.N. 106 737 151

TRUSTEE

UNDER INSTRUMENT 709244534

ESTATE AND LAND

Estate in Fee Simple

LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 714389

County of CARLISLE Parish of BASSETT

Local Government: MACKAY

EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS

1. Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by

Deed of Grant No. 10356109 (POR 7)

2. EASEMENT IN GROSS No 714619605 13/08/2012 at 14:20

burdening the land

MACKAY REGIONAL COUNCIL

over

EASEMENT F ON SP252778

3. EASEMENT IN GROSS No 714619612 13/08/2012 at 14:21

burdening the land

MACKAY REGIONAL COUNCIL

over

EASEMENT G ON SP252778

ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES - NIL

UNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL

CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

DEALINGS REGISTERED

714619598 SURVEY PLAN

714619605 EAS IN GROSS

714619612 EAS IN GROSS

Page 1/2

LAND TITLE ACT 1994

REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION STATEMENT

DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES, QUEENSLAND

Title Reference : 50585755

Corrections have occurred - Refer to Historical Search

Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority

** End of Confirmation Statement **

M G Locke

Registrar of Titles and Registrar of Water Allocations

Lodgement No: 3178611

Office: MACKAY

Email: [email protected]

MCKAYS SOLICITORS PTY LTD

PO BOX 37

MACKAY QLD 4740

Page 2/2

2RP702625

FH

43.468ha

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

8

RP730309

FH

1.982ha

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

5RP730309

FH

1.982ha

RURAL VIEWMACKAY REGIONAL

31RP884907

FH

3.635ha

RICHMONDMACKAY REGIONAL

33SP119354

FH

69.26ha

RICHMOND

MACKAY REGIONAL

24

SP132379

FH

9710m²

RURAL VIEW25

SP119968FH

1.05ha

RURAL VIEW

26

SP119968

FH

9227m²

A

SP

119968

B

SP119968

C

SP

141027

A

RP

884907

7

SP159747

FH

1.017ha

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

8

SP

159747FH

9667m²

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

28

SP170028

FH

9687m²

RURAL VIEW

27

SP170028

FH

1.014ha

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

903SP185586

FH

24.62ha

RICHMOND

MACKAY REGIONAL

902SP185586

FH5.814ha

RICHMOND

MACKAY REGIONAL

901SP185586

FH

6.6807ha

RICHMOND

MACKAY REGIONAL

1RP739276 FH2.023ha

RICHMONDMACKAY REGIONAL

1RP708467

FH

11.878ha

RICHMOND

MACKAY REGIONAL

8

RP

702628

6

C

124760

71

SP190923FH

9261m²

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

72

SP

190923FH

1.057ha

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

B

RP708734

30

SP208025

FH

9883m²

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

29

SP208025

FH

9949m²

RURAL VIEW

D

RP739747

C

RP739747 1RP714389

FH

8.868ha

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

511

CI3878

RE

2.364ha

1

RP734696

FH

5675m²

RICHMOND

2

GTP106700

FH

5215m²

1

GTP106700

FH

5636m²

0

GTP106700

2722m²

1

RP724649

FH

1.268ha

RURAL VIEW

2

SP128626

FH

4245m²

RICHMOND

1

SP128626

FH

4377m²

20

SP132653

FH

3803m²

25

SP132653

2169m²30

SP132653

2001m²

31

SP132653

2024m²

32

SP132653

A

SP159586

33

SP

159579

34

SP159579

37

SP159579

38

SP159579

1810m²

39

SP159579

2522m²

40

SP159579

41

SP159579

42

SP159579

43

SP159579

44

SP159579

45

SP159579

1677m²

46

SP159579

47

SP159579

48

SP159579

49

SP159579

50

SP159579

2027m²

51

SP159579

2214m²

52

SP159579

53

SP159579

54

SP159579

55

SP159579

56

SP159579

57

SP159579

58

SP159579

59

SP159579

60

SP159579

61

SP159579

62

SP159579

2389m²

63

SP159579

FH

2834m²

64

SP159579

FH

3637m²

65

SP159579

3007m²

66

SP159579

FH

1.887ha

RICHMOND

H

SP159579

J

SP159579

K

SP159579

XY

SP

159579

WY

SP159579

VY

SP159579

VX

SP

159579

UY

SP159579

2012m²

UX

SP

159579

TY

SP

159579TX

SP159579

1421m² SY

SP

159579

SX

SP159579

1442m²

RY

SP159579

RX

SP159579

QY

SP

159579

QX

SP159579

PY

SP159579

PX

SP159579

NY

SP159579

NX

SP159579

MY

SP159579

MX

SP159579

LY

SP159579

LX

SP159579

KY

SP159579

KX

SP159579

JY

SP159579

JX

SP159579

HY

SP159579

HX

SP159579

GY

SP159579

GX

SP159579

FY

SP

159579

FX

SP159579

1566m²

EY

SP

159579

EX

SP

159579

DY

SP

159579

DX

SP

159579

CX

SP159579

BY

SP159579

BX

SP159579

AY

SP159579

AX

SP159579

WX

SP159579

XX

SP159579

CY

SP

159579

900SP185586

FH13.06ha

RICHMOND

MACKAY REGIONAL

35

SP183075

FH

3063m²

C

SP172226EA

5663m²

D

SP172226EA

4504m²

RICHMOND

400SP244243

FH

7.713ha

RURAL VIEWMACKAY REGIONAL

10

SP248085

11

SP248085

34

SP248085

33

SP248085

32

SP248085

31

SP248085

H

SP248085G

SP248085

M

SP248085

L

SP248085

K

SP248085

J

SP248085

500SP248085

FH

42.2555ha

RICHMOND

MACKAY REGIONALQ

SP

248085

E

SP252754

F

SP

252778

G

SP252778EA

9026m²

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

23

SP

16572125

SP165721

26

SP165721

28

SP165721

29

SP16572130

SP165721

31

SP16572132

SP16572133

SP165721

34

SP16572135

SP165721

39

SP

165721

38

SP

165721

37

SP

165721

36

SP

165721

22

SP

165721

21

SP

165721

20

SP

165721

19

SP165721

18

SP16572117

SP165721

16

SP

165721

15

SP

165721

14

SP

165721

13

SP

165721

12

SP

165721

11

SP

165721

10

SP

165721

9

SP

165721

8

SP

165721

7

SP

165721

6

SP

165721

5

SP

165721

4

SP

165721

3

SP

165721

2

SP

165721

1

SP

165721

A

SP165721B

SP165721L

SP165721D

SP165721

N

SP165721

O

SP165721P

SP165721Q

SP165721

I

SP165721

J

SP165721K

SP165721C

SP

165721S

SP165721

R

SP165721

901

SP165721FH

1.132ha

RICHMOND

909

SP

165721

24

SP16572127

SP165721

M

SP165721

H

SP

252779

J

SP256548

57

SP255642

56

SP255642

55

SP255642

54

SP255642

53

SP255642

52

SP255642

73

SP255642

72

SP255642

71

SP255642

70

SP255642

69

SP255642

58

SP255642

59

SP255642

60

SP255642

61

SP255642

62

SP255642

40

SP

255642

41

SP

255642

42

SP

255642

68

SP255642

67

SP

25564263

SP255642

66

SP

255642

65

SP

25564264

SP

255642

51

SP

255642

50

SP

255642

49

SP

25564243

SP

255642

44

SP

255642

45

SP

255642

46

SP

255642

47

SP

255642

48

SP

255642

X

SP255642

W

SP255642

V

SP255642

U

SP255642E

SP

252777

905

SP255642

FH

15.43ha

RICHMOND

MACKAY REGIONAL

Y

SP255642

E

SP252777

EA

0m²

RICHMOND

MACKAY REGIONAL

902SP249177

FH9.434ha

RURAL VIEWMACKAY REGIONALR

SP

252780

1

RP

741521

FH

1.194ha

BEACONSFIELD

MACKAY REGIONAL

3

SP213261

FH

8.026ha

BEACONSFIELD

MACKAY REGIONAL

1

SP213261

FH

46.8244ha

BEACONSFIELD

MACKAY REGIONAL

17

SP254845

FH

16.5189ha

RURAL VIEW

MACKAY REGIONAL

4

SP256177

FH

4.233ha

BEACONSFIELD

MACKAY REGIONAL

135

SP256177

134

SP256177

124

SP256177

123

SP256177

122

SP256177

121

SP256177

120

SP256177119

SP256177

118

SP256177

117

SP

256177

114

SP256177115

SP256177116

SP256177

O

SP

247913

P

SP

247913

E

SP

247922

Q

SP256177

N

SP256177

M

SP256177

L

SP256177

K

SP256177

J

SP256177

I

SP256177

H

SP256177

129

SP256177

128

SP256177

127

SP

256177

126

SP

256177

125

SP

256177133

SP

256177

132

SP

256177

130

SP256177

ROAD

AV

EA

KO

NEL

G

STOAKVIEW

RE

GE

NT

AV

EN

UE

EAV

NT

REGE

AVEEDGKEPAREVAEPARKEDG

BLV

DD

AW

SO

N

KER

RIS

DA

LEC

RE

SC

EN

T

CRES

BENSARA

RO

AD

EY

SO

VB

EVRIDVIEW

RURAL

RD

AS

IAC

BU

AY

-K

AC

M

MA

CK

AY

-BU

CA

SIA

RO

AD

DR

IAS

CK

AY

-BU

CA

AM

MA

CK

AY

-BU

CA

SIA

RO

AD

RO

AD

Y-B

UC

AS

IAA

KC

MA

SH

UT

TL E

WO

OD

DR

IVE

SH

UT

TLE

WO

OD

DR

IVE

EM

MA

DR

193654193653

191808

191807

164949

148295

73537

134814

119476

DCDB

Lot/Plan 42/SP255642

Area/Volume 873m²

Tenure FREEHOLD

Local Government MACKAY REGIONAL

Locality RICHMOND

Parish BASSETT

County CARLISLE

Segment/Parcel 61845/740

SCDB Permanent Marks

SUBJECT PARCEL DESCRIPTION

SCALE 1 : 6000HORIZONTAL DATUM:GDA94 ZONE:55

m

120 240 360 480 6000

8755-41341

STANDARD MAP NUMBER

149°08'55".319

21°04'34".685

RURAL VIEW

2.01 KM

MAP WINDOW POSITION &NEAREST LOCATION

PRINTED (dd/mm/yyyy) 27/03/2013

DCDB 26/03/2013SCDB 27/03/2013;

Users of the information recorded in this document (the Information) accept all responsibility andrisk associated with the use of the Information and should seek independent professional advice inrelation to dealings with property.

Despite Department of Natural Resources and Mines(DNRM)'s best efforts, DNRM makesno representations or warranties in relation to the Information, and, to the extent permitted by law,exclude or limit all warranties relating to correctness, accuracy, reliability, completeness orcurrency and all liability for any direct, indirect and consequential costs, losses, damages andexpenses incurred in any way (including but not limited to that arising from negligence) inconnection with any use of or reliance on the Information

For further information on SmartMap products visit http://nrw.qld.gov.au/property/mapping/blinmap

CLIENT SERVICE STANDARDS

SmartMapAn External Product of

SmartMap Information Services

Based upon an extraction from the

Digital Cadastral Data Base

(c) The State of Queensland,(Department of NaturalResources and Mines) 2013.

72 25 00m E

25

72 30

72 30

35

35

72 40

72 40

1

766 75 00 m N

75

2

766 80

766 80

GDA

Queensland Government

21°04'51".469

149°08'18".618 149°09'00" 149°09'32".021

21°04'51".469

21°04'17".902

149°09'32".021149°09'00"

21°04'17".902

149°08'18".618

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 27

AP

PE

ND

IX

D

EMR and CLR Search

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 28

AP

PE

ND

IX

E

Park Agreement

and

Plan RIC0191

and

Council AICN correspondence

1

Paul Thompson

From: John Caldwell [[email protected]]Sent: Sunday, 14 October 2012 4:44 PMTo: Paul ThompsonCc: Peter Bratt; Shane KleveSubject: FW: Richmond Hills - Council agreemnt to principle that Park contributions in this instance

are able to be offset against the PSP regime as well as the AICN regime.- Da 2007-543, DA 2007-536, DA 2007-545

Attachments: 009-Council Agreement- Park.pdf; Park contribution budget .pdf

Paul, The Richmond Hills Adopted Infrastructure charge resolution identifies this site as having a new district sport park and a local rectreation park identified as item 2.8 on the parks map with resolution.- Your development is provided a component of this trunk park infrastructure. Once this site is developed where the AICN regime is applicable, then the Council is able to offset the agreed value of the land area and the embellishments value against the charges. As this site is one where there is a transition between the PSP regime for earlier approvals and offsetting agreed to earlier, the amount outstanding (after the credits are rationalised against the PSP regime) can be offset against the AICN for subsequent stages.The attached park contribution budget attached to this email will serve as the basis both for the PSP offsetting (as agreed earlier) as well as the offset for the AICN regime. When the survey plan is lodged when the approval was issued under the AICN regime, then the total AICN charge will reduced by the value of the outstanding offset. If the offset is greater than the AICN charge for that survey plan, then the offset credit will be transferred to subsequent stages. This is of course assuming that you have provided the relevant parkland area and embellishments as agreed as per the relevant stage associated with the survey plan for that stage. As an example if the attached park contribution was entirely subject to only the AICN regime, the $2763475of land and embellishments would equate to about 99 lots using the capped figure of $28,000 per lot under the AICN regime in simplistic terms. Assuming that there were no other claimed offsets, then a simplistic way forward would be to say the next 99 lots would not attract a AICN contribution to be paid. Preferably the maximum offset to be claimed at each survey plan should be say 20% of the AICN charge so that other infrastructure networks are not denied their contribution, but this is something that will need more specific detailed working to determine how the reconciliation will work in practice. When the relevant survey plan is lodged the parkland reconciliation should use the values as fixed in November 2010 dollars on your budget tabulation as the AICN contribution is a capped figure so any reconciliation will need to factor this into account. In summary, the AICN regime recognises that an offset against the AICN charge can be given because you are providing trunk park infrastructure and that Council has already recognised that there is an agreement to certain lands and embellishments from the first few stages that took into account the total development of the estate from the PSP regime to AICN regime. The reconciliation of the relevant stages parkland contribution under the relevant regime is accepted in principle but a more detailed reconciliation will be needed as survey plans are presented for endorsement.

Regards,

John Caldwell | Manager Development Assessment | Mackay Regional Council � 07 4961 9172 | � 07 4944 2411 | � [email protected]| � www.mackay.qld.gov.au

Kevene- to register

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 29

AP

PE

ND

IX

F

Remnant Vegetation Mapping

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 30

AP

PE

ND

IX

G

Masterplan Layout

GRANGEWOOD AVE

REGE

NT A

VE

CRESTRIDGE AVE

GLEN

OAK

AVE

EAGLEFORD ST

OAKVIEW STPARKEDGE

AVEJA

NMAC

CT

McCREADYS

CREEK

GRANGEWOOD AVE

WAT

ER &

SW

EMT

DAWSONS BLVD

MACKAY HABANA ROAD

2020 0 806040 100m

1:2000 - A1 1:4000 - A3

79 Phillip StreetPO Box 8158Mt Pleasant Q 4740

Ph: (07) 4968 0000 Fax: (07) 4942 4648 email: [email protected]

C

T:\Jo

bs\50

05-R

ichmo

nd H

ills\R

IC05

\Dra

wing

s\023

6 - M

aster

plan D

rawi

ngs\5

005.0

530-

0236

Mas

terpla

n Dra

wing

s.dwg

DATE

PLO

TTED

: 15 A

pril 2

013 9

:01 A

M B

Y : B

REND

AN A

. VAS

SALL

O

IMPORTANT NOTE:EASEMENTS AND PROPOSED CIVIL WORKS SHOWN ARE INDICATIVE ONLY &SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL WORKS APPROVAL.FINAL LOT DESIGN, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENTAPPROVALS AND FINAL SURVEY.THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HERE-ON HAVE NOT BEEN MARKED AT THE TIME OFPREPARATION OF THIS PLAN.

Development Assessment Report

12 April 2013 31

AP

PE

ND

IX

H

Existing Infrastructure within Easements