richard jordan

17
Insert the title of your presentation here Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date Reducing spread rates to save salt Presented by Richard Jordan Principal Researcher – 24 March 2010

Upload: snowsummit

Post on 05-Jul-2015

198 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Richard Jordan

Insert the title of your presentation herePresented by Name HereJob Title - Date

Reducing spread rates to save saltPresented by Richard JordanPrincipal Researcher – 24 March 2010

Page 2: Richard Jordan

Factors affecting required spread rate

Page 2

Initial salt distribution

Amount of salt in solution at road surface- Rate of dissolution

- Trafficking

Amount of water present- Drainage

- Trafficking

Forecast road surface temperature

Page 3: Richard Jordan

Page 3

Spreading direction

LV Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 RM RVHS

42

9 10 11 12 13 14

27 2825 26

4 5

39 40 41

6 7 8

14m

28m

15 16

29 30

18 19 20

32 33 34

21

Strip 1

Strip 2

Strip 3

0m

17

31

1 2 3

35 36

22 23 24

37 38

0 5 8.6 12.2 15.8

Position across carriageway (m)

Salt distribution and salt loss trials

Page 4: Richard Jordan

Poor distribution profile and high wastage

Page 4

Spreader direction

0

10

20

30

40

0 4 8 12 16

Spread salt (g/m2

)

Position across carriageway (m)

Dry salting at 20g/m²

Strip 1

Strip 2

Strip 3

Average

Verge Lane 1 Lane 2 Verge

Page 5: Richard Jordan

Dry, pre-wetted and treated salt

Page 5

Spreader direction

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 2 4 6 8 10

Spread Salt (g/m²

)

Position across carriageway (m)

Salt 1

Salt 2

Salt 3

Verge Lane 1 Lane 2 Verge

Page 6: Richard Jordan

Reasonable distribution with little wastage

Page 6

7.7

Spreader direction

0

5

10

15

20

0 4 8 12 16

Spread salt (g/m2

)

Position across carriageway (m)

Prewetted salting at 10g/m²Strip 1

Strip 2

Strip 3

Average

Verge Lane 1 Lane 2 Verge

Page 7: Richard Jordan

What can be achieved with correct settings for de-icer

0

5

10

15

20

0 5 10 15 20

Spread salt (g/m²)

Position across carriageway (m)

Prewetted salting at 20g/m2

Strip 1

Strip 2Strip 3Average

HS Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3

15.4

7.7

Page 7

Page 8: Richard Jordan

Dry salt

Page 8

Page 9: Richard Jordan

Pre-wetted salt

Dry salt:Brine 70:30 by weight

Brine concentration: 23%

Page 9

Page 10: Richard Jordan

Factors to consider

Page 10

Moisture content of salt should be controlled – preferred range 1.5 to 3.5%

Salt distribution becomes less consistent the more moisture content increases above 4%

Spreader settings must be optimised for the de-icer to be spread

Salt loss is higher for dry salt than for pre-wetted salt and treated salt

Initial salt distribution can be more uniform with pre-wetted salt and treated salt

Page 11: Richard Jordan

Effect of salt distribution and salt loss on spread rate

Page 11

Target salt at forecast conditions

(g/m2)

Minimum initial

dosage relative to nominal

spread rate

Salt remaining

after trafficking

Required nominal

spread rate (g/m2)

Salt saving

5.0 80% 40% 15.6

5.0 85% 45% 13.1 17%

5.0 90% 50% 11.1 29%

Page 12: Richard Jordan

Surface state definitions (from Raukola et al, 1993)

Definition Water (g/m2)

Water film thickness

(mm)Description

Little moist 5 – 20 0.005 – 0.02 Detectably dark road surface

Moist 20 – 50 0.02 – 0.05 Clearly dark road surface

Wet 50 – 200 0.05 – 0.20 Spray phenomenon starts

Very wet 200 – 400 0.20 – 0.40 Small drops of water in the air

Flowing >400 >0.40 Flow according to gradient, splash

Page 12

Page 13: Richard Jordan

Proposed spread rates (1)

Weather and road conditions

Old dry salting spread

rate (g/m2)

New dry salting spread

rate (g/m2)

New pre-wetted salting

Spread rate

(g/m2)

Salt content (g/m2)

Frost or forecast frostRST at or above -2˚C 10 8 8 6.2

Page 13

Page 14: Richard Jordan

Proposed spread rates (2)

Weather and road conditions

Old dry salting spread

rate (g/m2)

New dry salting spread

rate (g/m2)

New pre-wetted salting

Spread rate

(g/m2)

Salt content (g/m2)

Frost or forecast frost RST below - 2oC and above - 5oC and dry or damp road conditions (50% more if damp and lightly trafficked) 20

10 9 6.9

Frost or forecast frost RST below - 2oC and above - 5oC and wet road conditions (50% more if lightly trafficked)

16 15 11.5

Page 14

Page 15: Richard Jordan

Conclusions

For precautionary treatments

There is potential to reduce salt usage by reducing spread rates

The amount spread rates can be reduced safely is dependent on the initial salt distribution

To achieve a uniform salt distribution, spreaders must be set up for the salt being spread

Salt must be stored carefully if it is to be spread consistently

Page 15

Page 16: Richard Jordan

National Winter Service Research Group

Best Practice Guidance

Performance requirements for spreaders

Spreader calibration procedures

Controlling moisture content variations to optimise performance

Salting technology – dry, pre-wet, treated

Salt and cost saving measures

Route selection

Road weather information systems

Information needs for short, medium and long term decisions

Page 16

Page 17: Richard Jordan

Page 17

Thank you

Reducing spread rates to save salt

Snow Summit 2010

Presented by Richard JordanPrincipal Researcher – 24 March 2010

Tel: 01344 770828Email: [email protected]