rating overweight long bet on industry catalysts … conclusion, despite of the mature status of...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1
Industry Coverage
10 Oct 2017
Industry Coverage
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
Rating OVERWEIGHT
Industry Fertilizer
Table of content
1. Fertilizer industry structure
2. Gloomy overall picture …
3. … But opportunities from
industry major shifts & policies
4. Sector financials & valuation
5. Stock pick
Mr. Hoang Ha Nguyen
Pharmaceutical, Consumer, Chemical
(+84-28) 3914 8585 - Ext: 1463
www.kisvn.vn
Long bet on industry catalysts amid gloomy output
Pros:
Despite its commodity characteristics, Vietnam fertilizer is a non-replaceable
industry because it contributes to 30%-50% crop productivity growth, which must
ensure food security of the whole Vietnamese population of 90 million people as
well as USD15.1bn agricultural foodstuff export annually.
We expect the current industry competitive positions will change little in the next
5 years, as the top largest producers have already gained strong competitive
advantages of exclusive input material sources and extensive distribution network.
Major long-term shifting from mono-nutrient fertilizers to complex fertilizers will
create huge opportunities for large & premium NPK producers. The NPK market is
projected to grow 7% annually until 2021.
Positive supporting policies from the government, including: (1) 0% VAT
imposed on fertilizer products (2) self-defense tariffs for DAP/MAP binary fertilizers
and (3) the forced equity sale of the State at major gas-based urea producers.
Most importantly, while dividend yield keeps increasing thanks to decreasing
stock price - thus creating limited downside risks, valuation from a Price-to-Book
ratio (P/B) standpoint looks highly attractive: fertilizer sector P/B is currently at 1.43
times, 40% lower than that of the VNIndex.
Cons:
We believe that the overall size of fertilizer consumption market is quite hard to
expand in the mid-term because of the mature penetration status, economic
restructure towards industrial/service and stagnation in agri-commodities price.
Thus, sales growth of each player mostly comes from cannibalizing market share
of ordinary small and low-end producers or diversifying their product mix.
Imported products, especially nitrogenous & binary DAP/SA, are getting stronger
and stronger thanks to their low price, currently making up 41% of local
consumption volume. Thus, we expect a price war to continue in the coming years.
Organic and clean agricultural production trend will gradually be a threatening
force to traditional chemical fertilizer manufacturers.
0% value-added tax law amendment for fertilizer is promising but will only be
effective in 2019 at the earliest.
High government ownership in each fertilizer company hinders flexibility and the
ability to make aggressive growth plans.
In conclusion, despite of the mature status of local fertilizer industry, the
consumption pattern changes coupled with favorable government policies and
especially cheap valuation provide attractive opportunities for investors. Therefore,
we issue an OVERWEIGHT with long-term vision on this sector.
Stock pick in this report: DPM
Page 2
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
1. Vietnam Fertilizer Industry Structure
Product Mix
The product mix of both Vietnamese and global fertilizer industry is currently divided
into 03 major groups – each with distinguished use and ingredients:
- Straight fertilizers provide single inorganic nutrient (e.g., K, P, or N), including the
common urea (NH3 based), phosphate (P2O5 based) and potassium fertilizer (KNO3
based)
- Complex fertilizers provide two or more nutrients, including the most widely used
NPK (combination of N, P and K) and binary fertilizers (such as DAP, MAP with N &
P nutrients)
- Organic fertilizers provide organic nutrients from plants/animals-derived matter
Though diversified as it is, Vietnamese fertilizer consumption is mostly dominated by
complex fertilizer NPK (36%), mono-nutrient urea (21%), phosphate/superphosphate
(13%) and other binaries such as DAP, MAP, SA (each around 9% of total fertilizer
consumption volume). Less than 3% of total consumption is organic fertilizers
because of no local mass producer dominated.
Compared to the mix of global fertilizer industry, urea and DAP/MAP are mostly
used (52% volume) while NPK and premium fertilizer (<15% volume) are still low
because the fertilizer consumption in China – the largest agricultural country - is
highly concentrated on nitrogenous fertilizer. However, according to Argus, the
premium trend towards specialized fertilizer modes with higher nutrient density –
which is a signature characteristic of NPK – is inevitable in long term.
36%
21%
13%
9%
8%
8%5%
Vietnam Fertilizer Product Mix
NPK Urea
Phosphate DAP (binary N&P)
MAP (binary N&P) Potassium
Others (SA, organic, …)
2015 11 MT consumption
Source: MoIT, Vinachem
11%
35%
6%17%
14%
17%
Global Fertilizer Product Mix
NPK Urea
Phosphate DAP/MAP (binary N&P)
Potassium Others (SA, organic, …)
2015 181 MT consumption
Source: Yara International, IFA
Page 3
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
Local Industry Value Chain
Lack of specific mineral ores, Vietnamese local manufacturers can only produce
NPK, urea, phosphate and DAP fertilizers while almost all potassium and sulfuric
fertilizers have to be imported.
Urea Natural gas (CH4) -
PVGas
Coal (CO2) - Vinacomin
or imported
Ammonia (NH3) - local
Chemicals - local
Gas-based urea production
Dam Phu My - DPM, Dam
Ca Mau - DCM
Coal-based urea production
Dam Ha Bac - DHB, Dam
Ninh Binh
Owned
subsidiaries
(DPM, DCM)
Major
distributors
(Vinacam,
Apromaco)
Level 1 agents
Level 2
retailers
End users:
Farmers,
cooperative
societies, and
export
Phosphate Local apatite rock -
Ca5(PO4)3
Local sulfuric acid
(H2SO4)
Other imported minerals
(serpentine, sandstone)
Fused magnesium
phosphate production
Ninh Binh Phosphate - NFC,
Van Dien Fused - VAF
Superphosphate production
Lam Thao Superphosphate
- LAS
Potassium Potassium minerals (K)
Sulfur minerals (SA)
Wholly imported – mostly
from China - due to lack of
minerals
Binary Local ammonia (NH3)
Local apatite rock (P)
Imported sulfur rock (S)
Diammonium phosphates
DAP production
DAP Lao Cai, DAP Dinh Vu
– DDV
NPK Local nitrogen fertilizer
(N)
Local phosphate fertilizer
(P)
Imported potassium
fertilizer (K)
Blending straight
fertilizer/other granulation
“NPK” production
LAS, BFC, SFG, DPM,
NFC, VAF, Nam Sao Group
Organic Animal manure
Plants compost
Bone meal, ashes
Granulating process
Local farmers & imports
As the market has been matured and most of manufacturers have secured their
positions in this industry value chain, we expect the current industry structure will
maintain in the foreseeable future, which is difficult for new entrants to find even a
niche market.
92%
30%
95%
80%
8%
70%
100%
5%
20%
0% 50% 100%
NPK
BinaryDAP/MAP
Potassium (K)
Phosphate(P)
Urea (N)
Vietnam fertilizer local supply capability 2016
Local Demand Met Import
Product Input Materials Production Distribution
Source: MARD, KISVN research
Page 4
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
Consumption Output & Distribution
- Fertilizer consumption is mostly distributed in Eastern South and Mekong Delta
regions, accounting for approximately 59% of consumption volume nationwide.
Thanks to favorable weather, geologic condition and demographics, this region will
continue playing a key role in the fertilizer market of Vietnam in our opinion.
- Rice is the most straight-fertilizer consuming plant with 65% of total demand, of
which 49% is for the winter-spring crop. The remaining 35% is from industrial plants
such as corn, rubber, coffee and sugar cane. However, the downtrend of commodity
markets since 2011-2012 have dragged down the fertilizer demand of these
industrial plants. Cyclically, we expect this industrial segment will gradually gain
back its consumption volume in the next five years.
- Together with the downtrend in commodity price, global fertilizer price index has
decreased 12% per annum since the peak of 2011 – according to FAO organization.
As of Q3/2017, NPK was sold at the highest selling price of between VND9,000-
13,000 per kg, phosphate products at the lowest of VND2,000-3,600 per kg while
urea fertilizers often fluctuated around VND6,000 per kg. In the recent years, the
prices of all types of fertilizer have dropped 8%-10% annually due to lower demand,
increasing production capacity and local bad weather condition. We believe this
negative price trend is the main obstacle for Vietnamese local manufacturers from
pushing their export channels.
- Regarding selling channel, we expect companies with long history like DPM, LAS,
BFC, SFG will maintain their strong competitiveness in the long term thanks to their
extensive distribution systems:
Co. Year of
establishment Distribution channel Market
LAS 54 years
brand 100 wholesalers
Retailers in 63
provinces
North & Central
regions focus
Export to Japan,
Taiwan, South Korea
SFG 40 years
brand 400 wholesalers
10,000
retailers
South & Mekong
Delta focus
Export to Cambodia,
Japan, Myanmar
BFC 25 years
brand 200 wholesalers 2,500 retailers
South & Central
Highlands focus
Export to Cambodia,
Myanmar, Laos, Thai
DPM 13 years
brand 80 wholesalers 3,000 retailers South focus n.a
Entrance Barriers & Alternative products
- Despite of the large threats from both international and domestic large-scale
projects such as Kaltim V, Indonesia (1.5mil tons of urea per year) or PVFCCo. (250
thousand tons of NPK per year) which are under construction, the advantages of
local existing companies from resources accessibility (ex: gas, ores, chemicals) or
extensive distribution channels are big entrance barriers to new companies.
59%17%
24%
Vietnam fertilizer consumption by regions, 2014
Southern Vietnam
Central Vietnam
Northern Vietnam
Source: MARD, KISVN research
65%9%
8%
5%
3%
3%
7%
Vietnam straight-fertilizer consumption by plants, 2015
Rice
Corn
Rubber
Coffee
Sugarcane
Cashew
Others
Source: MARD, KISVN research
1,500,000
907,500
1,500,000
330,000
250,000
0 800,000 1,600,000
Urea Kaltim V -Indonesia
Urea B Pusri II -Indonesia
Potassium Garlyk -Turkmenistan
DAP Lao Cai - VN
NPK Phu My - VN
Asia & Vietnam fertilizer expansion projects 2015 - 2017
(tons capacity)
Source: KISVN research
Page 5
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
- Meanwhile, premium alternative products like water soluble NPK and organic
fertilizers are gradually becoming the major threats for replacing traditional single-
nutrient products to meet environmental and health standards by GlobalGAP.
Rivals & Competitive Strategies
Cost leadership: in the context of 800 local producers, we observe that most
fertilizer producers have to follow the “cost-leadership” strategy by increasing
economies of scale and distribution coverage. Nevertheless, imported low-quality,
low-price fertilizer has dragged down the performance of many producers such as
DPM, LAS, DDV, NFC, VAF, e.g. in these recent years.
- Imported fertilizers, especially mono-nutrient or nitrogenous binary fertilizers (such
as urea or DAP/SA), have started a price war and been a major competitive force to
local manufacturers for many years. Imported products, of which 60% comes from
developed industrial countries like China and Russia, offers retail prices usually
10%-20% lower than local domestic ones.
- Thus, capacity expansion and promotion discount strategies of local companies in
order to keep reducing selling price may not be working in the mono-nutrient sub-
industry. However, NPK market (complex fertilizer) is showing a different and
positive picture, in which demand is growing thanks to changing consumption
pattern and many players such as DPM, LAS and BFC are hurrying the completion
of new plants to increase approximately 30% supply during 2017-2019.
- In our opinion, businesses that target segments other than the already foreign-
dominated ones like DAP/SA/Potassium will have stronger return on capital and
better growth prospect.
- Product differentiation: While DCM has continuously sought growth by high-
quality granular urea products, DPM & BFC have implemented the same premium
market strategy by expanding into premium NPK, supplement chemicals (NH3,
UFC85, CO2, H2O2) and organic fertilizers, respectively. Although the volume of
these products are still very low comparative to their current product mix, we highly
appreciate this strategy as it is the only way to grow amid the current trend of
switching from single-nutrient to complex fertilizer and growing demand for high-
quality fertilizers.
3.03 3.32 4.16 2.37
7.44 6.90 6.84
3.43
0
4
7
11
14
2008 2012 2016 1H2017
Vietnam fertilizer import/supply condition 2008 - 1H2017
Local Supply
Imported Fertilizers
34%
31%
11%
4%
19%
Phu My Urea(DPM)
Ca Mau Urea(DCM)
Ha Bac Urea(DHB)
Ninh Binh Urea
Other importedurea (China,Indonesia, e.g.)
2016Vietnam urea market share
19%
15%
9%6%6%
4%2%
39%
Lam Thao NPK(LAS)
Binh Dien NPK(BFC)
Vinacam NPK(trading)
Con O NPK(SFG)
Viet Nhat NPK
Baconco NPK
NPK Phu My(DPM)
Others localmanufacturers
2016Vietnam NPK market share
Source: KISVN estimated
Source: MARD annual report, KISVN research
Unit: million tons
46%
11%7%
6%
5%4%
22%
Vietnam imported fertilizers breakdown by countries 2016
China
Russia
Belarussia
South Korea
Indonesia
Canada
OthersSource: Vietnam Customs
Source: DPM, KISVN research
Page 6
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
2. Gloomy Overall Picture …
Little Room Left For Penetration
<1> Exceptionally high consumption per hectare
- According to Trading Economics, Vietnam fertilizer consumption per hectare of
arable land is currently 397kg - which is more than 3 times higher than the average
of lower-middle income countries of 121kg, signifying a strongly mature status of
agricultural chemicals sector in Vietnam.
<2> Flat agricultural land expansion
- During the period 1995-2001, agricultural land of Vietnam grew sharply 5.0%
CAGR from around 7.0 million ha to 9.5 million ha. However, the growth decreased
significantly to 0.9% CAGR and is projected to remain so in the next 10 years,
according to World Bank data.
Modernization Dampens Output
<3> Economic sector switch
- In 1990, agriculture contributed 1.6% for 8.2% growth of GDP; agriculture
decreased its contribution to 0.7% over 6.3% GDP growth in 2008 and only 0.2%
over 6.2% GDP growth of last year, signifying a consistent trend of Vietnam
economy shifting into industrial & service sectors, which are now contributing
over 95% of GDP growth. The result of GDP components have also changed
markedly. In 1990, 38% of Vietnam total GDP was from agricultural sector; but in
2016, only 16% of Vietnam total GDP was accounted by agriculture.
7
8
10
11
13
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Vietnam agricultural land 1985 - 2014 to 2025F (millions hectare)
Vietnam Agricultural Era
565
397
239
212
165
152
30
20
16
121
165
130
126
138
0 150 300 450
China
Vietnam
Israel
Indonesia
India
Thailand
Cambodia
Myanmar
Russia
Low-mid income
European Union
OECD members
Latin America
World
Vietnam fertilizer consumption with comparables 2014 (kg/ha)
Source: World Bank Group Data
1.6% 1.0% 0.7% 0.2% 0.1%0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
1990 2000 2008 2016 2025F
Vietnam GDP growth contribution by sector
Taxes exclude subsidies Service
Industrial Agricultural
Source: Trading Economics
Source: GSO Vietnam, World Bank, KISVN Research
16.3%
32.7%40.9%
10.0%
Vietnam GDP structure by sector size - 2016
Agriculture
Industrial
Service
Taxes excludesubsidies
Source: GSO Vietnam
Page 7
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
<4> Higher quality standard & environmental protection trend
- During the last two decades, poor supervision coupling with overuse of pesticides
and fertilizers are key problems to consumer food safety and land degradation.
- Ever since the growth of modern retail channels leading to good agricultural
processing standards (such as GlobalGAP and VietGAP), we notice a strong
movement in both the suppliers and consumers on higher quality requirements for
food safety, which will likely to reduce the demand for fertilizers, pesticides as well
as antibiotics and other chemicals to stimulate productivity.
Agricultural Commodities Yet To Recover
<5> Stagnation in agricultural commodities price
- The slowdown of China economy, the deflation threat of developed countries like
Japan and Europe and the disorder of global climate have been a long-term
negative force to worldwide agriculture commodity sector. In particular, food crops
price such as rice, corn have dropped 25%-50% while industrial crops such as
rubber, coffee, sugar price have been lowered at least 30% compared to 2012.
- According to Yara International, with commercial fertilizer accounting for average
25%-35% food crop production cost structure and 30%-50% crop yield growth, the
current stagnation in agricultural commodity output will keep fertilizer price from
increasing any time soon.
- Amid such trend, Vietnamese commodities price are also facing short-term impact
of low inflation and oversupply condition in certain segments (like export rice due to
competition from Thailand & Indonesia) so we believe there hardly is any room for
significant price recover yet.
21.6 26.1 29.7 33.839.8
8.5 10.2
14.7
23.2
27.2
0.7 1.0
1.2
1.6
2.3
0
25
50
75
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Vietnam groceries sales by modern retail channels
(trillion VND)
Supermarket Hypermarket
Convenience stores
Source: Euromonitor International
Source: Bloomberg, KISVN research
Source: Yara International
41.6%
29.0%
16.3%
9.6%2.2%1.3%
Typical rice production cost structure (%)
Farmers, machineries Fertilizers
Plant Protection Chems Seeds
Energy Depreciation
76.29
69.13
92.76 89.79
66.88 62.96
77.84
47.5547.74362525
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
Aug-12 Feb-13 Aug-13 Feb-14 Aug-14 Feb-15 Aug-15 Feb-16 Aug-16 Feb-17
Global typical agricultural commodities price index 2012 - 2017 (%)
Rice 5% broken Thai
Corn maize
Rubber Singapore
Coffee Robusta
Sugar US
Source: Bloomberg, KISVN research
Page 8
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
3. … But Opportunities From Major Sub-Industry Shifts & Policy
Catalysts
In conclusion of the above analysis, we believe that the big picture of fertilizer
consumption market is quite hard to expand now because (1) the highly mature
penetration, (2) the economic shift towards modernized industrial & service and the
stagnation of agricultural commodity price. Nonetheless, the only way that some
local fertilizer producers can increase their top line is by cannibalizing the market
share of small producers.
Industry Shifts & Trends
<1> Major switching trend from mono-nutrient fertilizers to complex fertilizers
- Having the agricultural advantages of high nutrient density, slow solubility and
specialized modes for each type of plant, multi-nutrients (or so called complex)
fertilizers are becoming a better option for farmers and major agricultural producers.
- Particularly, the most popular complex fertilizer product in Vietnam - NPK - has
consistently increased its market share from less than 30% in the beginning of
2000s to more than 36% of total consumption volume now. Agromonitor projected
that Vietnam NPK market will grow 7% CAGR til’ 2020; meanwhile, other straight
fertilizer products such as urea will only grow 1.5% CAGR during the same period.
- Because of the higher productivity of NPK complex fertilizer compared to the
combination of three separate N, P and K straight-fertilizers as well as the wide
application of agricultural standards such as VietGAP and GlobalGAP which limits
the use of inorganic fertilizer, this trend is inevitable in our opinion. We expect that
large manufacturers that focus on premium product instead of normal blending NPK
will benefit from this shift in the long term, such as DPM (chemical process), BFC &
SFG (pipe reactor granulation).
<2> High-cost producers are on the verge of extinction
- We notice that high-cost fertilizer producers, such as coal-based urea producers
Dam Ha Bac (DHB)/Dam Ninh Binh or apatite-based DAP producers DAP-Vinachem
(DDV), are consistently losing money and market share due to heavy input
expenses and low selling volume. Accordingly, DAP Dinh Vu, Dam Ha Bac and Dam
Ninh Binh have suffered an accumulated loss of VND507bn, VND1,900bn and
VND3,000bn, respectively.
- Although different ministries of Vietnam government are finding solutions to
recover these factories, we believe that the three pressures of (1) shortage of coal &
apatite ores in long-term (2) increasing logistics cost (3) gloomy fertilizer
consumption outlook will drive these companies to the verge of extinction. Our belief
is based on the underlying fact that their business models hugely lack competitive
advantage when comparing to more efficient gas-based urea or the higher-quality
NPK products. Most importantly, according to their management, these producers
can not cover their variable cost – which is currently around 6,700VND per kg –
while urea market price is only around 6,000VND per kg.
Source: MARD, KISVN research
2.2 2.8 3.0 3.8 4.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2004 2007 2010 2013 2016
Vietnam top 5 fertilizer consumption trend 2004-
2016 (million tons)
NPK Urea Phosphate Potash DAP
(1,900)
(3,000)
(507)(312)
(600)
(41)
Dam Ha Bac Dam Ninh Binh DAP Dinh Vu
Fertilizer high-cost producers performance (VND bn)
Accumulated loss 1H2017 loss 1H2016 loss
Source: KISVN research
Source: MARD, KISVN research
Page 9
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
<3> Organic emphasis and “clean” agricultural start-up trend in Vietnam
- Thanks to consumer pattern now focusing on food safety by preference of organic
products (such as milk, vegetables, rice, meat), there are a huge startup trend in
“clean agriculture” as well as “high-tech agriculture” both from large corporates like
VinEco, Pan Salad, Loc Troi and small & young entrepreneurs (Department of
Agriculture & Development in HCMC forecasted that its’ businesses in agriculture
field will reach 1,500 enterprises in 2020, more than tripling that of the last 10 years)
- In our opinion, flexible producers who have strategic plan to develop organic
fertilizers or low-chemical-component fertilizers will be likely to profit and survive
from this gradual trend.
Governmental Stimulation Policies
<1> VAT 0% imposed on fertilizer product line
- August 16th of 2017, Ministry of Finance sent to the National Congress for the
amendment of Value-added Tax law; in which fertilizer products will be categorized
into 0% VAT taxable goods instead of non-VAT taxable one (without tax refund).
- Simply speaking, non-VAT category will consider fertilizer producers as end-
consumers while 0%-VAT one will put them back as producers and thus they can
claim the refund of input VAT. In other words, if this law amendment is approved,
fertilizer producers will be able to gain huge input VAT tax refund from the
government, which is currently a large component of their cost structures.
- Particularly, we estimate that this policy to have a pretty positive impact on the
bottom line of the following fertilizer producer annually, especially those with high
percentage of raw materials in COGS:
Stock Input materials 2016 net income
(VNDbn)
Estimated 0% VAT
refund annual impact
Estimated
change in EPS
DPM Natural gas (58%) 1,140.9 +350 billion pretax +715VND
DCM Natural gas (26%)(*) 624.3 +80-100 billion pretax +135VND
LAS Apatite ores, sulfur,
potassium (90%) 138.2 +100-120 billion pretax +770VND
VAF Apatite ores, coal,
serpentine (73%) 44.4 +50-60 billion pretax +1,150VND
BFC
SFG
N,P,K finished
products as materials
(95%)
277.1
90.6
finished goods won’t
have tax refund n/a
Source: KISVN research, (*) DCM has input gas price supported by PVN
- This 0% VAT amendment has to be submitted to National Congress in the
beginning of 2018 at the earliest. If approved, it will take effect only in the beginning
of 2019.
Input
•Pay VAT 10% for input materials (natural gas, ores, sulfur, ...)
Output
•0% VAT for output
Tax refund
• Tax refund for input VAT 10%
• Lower COGS
0% VAT policy tax refund for fertilizers (expected)
Input
• Pay VAT 10% for input materials (natural gas, ores, sulfur, ...)
Output
• 0% VAT for output
Tax refund
• No tax refund
• Higher COGS
Ordinary non-VAT incurred for fertilizers (current)
Page 10
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
- Thus, although the quick increase of the stock price of listed fertilizers has pretty
much reflected the expectation on the positive impact on these companies’ profit, we
believe this policy catalyst is a long-term factor instead (we can only see such an
impact in 2019 at the soonest). Therefore, most of beneficiaries like LAS, VAF and
DPM would record profit improvements only since 2019, if the above policy
approved.
<2> Self-defense tariff for imported DAP/MAP fertilizers
- August 19th 2017, Ministry of Industry & Trade officially issued Decision No.3044
on application of self-defense tariffs for imported DAP/MAP fertilizer products,
making up for VND1,855,790 per ton, or approximately 20% increase compared to
current price according to our estimation.
- Particularly, this tariff will last only 200 days until March 03rd 2018 and it will
exclude products with low nitrogen components (<7%), low phosphate (<30%) and
high potassium (>3%). Moreover, it will also exclude products imported from
countries having less than 3% market share of local Vietnamese DAP/MAP
consumption.
- We think that this self-defense tariff on fertilizer cannot have significant impact like
what we saw in the steel industry in 2016 because: (1) it will only last for 200 days
(2) the recent sharp increase in imported DAP/MAP is only short-term volatility and
(3) distributors can avoid this tariff by switching into excluded countries’ source..
<3> Equity divestments by government shareholders
- August 17th 2017, Deputy Prime Minister Vuong Dinh Hue approved numerous
divestments related to Petro Vietnam Group (PVN). In these divestments,
noticeably, PVN must lower their equity ownership by the end of 2018 in two
gas-based major urea producers DPM & DCM to at least below 51%.
- Although there may be non-controllable stake of 9%-25% to be sold, we argue that
this trend is positive in long-term because a decentralized ownership structure will
partially reduce growth stagnation and improve cost management in a typical state-
owned company.
- Regarding Vinachem’s subsidiaries, there are no sign of any equity sale decisions,
except for resolutions of “in the red” factories like Dam Ninh Binh, Dam Ha Bac, DAP
Vinachem. Hence, we expect Vinachem Group to maintain controlling interests in
profitable NPK fertilizer producers (such as BFC, LAS and SFG) although there are
possibilities that Vinachem parent company is planning for IPO up to 49% stake.
Source: KISVN research
100.0%
100.0%
97.7%
75.6%
69.8%
65.1%
65.0%
64.0%
59.6%
0.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Dam Ninh Binh
Vigecam
Dam Ha Bac
DCM
LAS
SFG
BFC
DAP-Vinachem
DPM
Vietnam large fertilizer producers state-ownership percentage (%)
Page 11
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
4. Sector Financial & Valuation
List of fertilizer producers for computations & comparisons (trailing 12m figures):
Ticker Market Cap
(VND bn)
Revenue T12M
(VND bn)
Sales growth (%)
Gross margin
(%)
Debt/Equity (%)
ROE (%)
DPM 8,962 7,850 (2.49) 26.3 7.1 9.7
DCM 7,332 5,640 32.54 31.2 85.4 13.5
BFC 2,333 6,136 0.67 16.0 161.1 31.8
DHB 1,851 2,157 22.51 7.86 1,108.0 (86.12)
LAS 1,783 4,015 (4.92) 18.1 44.6 10.9
DDV 1,023 1,640 58.57 3.31 34.6 (8.62)
SFG 690 2,257 (11.65) 11.0 70.1 16.7
VAF 426 968 15.80 23.9 - 9.7
NFC 252 567 2.38 17.3 0.4 9.3
- On the contrary to the period of 2006 - 2011, Vietnam fertilizer sector suffered the
most difficult downtrend during 2012 – 2016 when revenue dropped 80% and net
income dropped 84% due to gloomy agricultural consumption and competition from
imported products, thus resulting in a significant decrease in ROE from more than
25% to less than 5%.
- However, regarding cash flow, we observe that after the above gloomy period,
many producers have slowed down capex investment while maintaining good CFO
and cash dividend payout to shareholders. Meanwhile, after 2013, capital structure
of fertilizer sector has been quite stable and healthy. From the market perspective,
dividend yield has increased recently – also 5 times higher than the average
dividend yield of VNIndex, showing limited of downside risks.
Source: Bloomberg, KISVN research
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
-
8,000
16,000
24,000
32,000
40,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fertilizer sector business performance
Revenue Net income
Net margin ROE
VND bn
(7,000)
(5,000)
(3,000)
(1,000)
1,000
3,000
5,000
7,000
2012A 2013A 2014A 2015A 2016A
Fertilizer sector cash flow performance
CFO CFF CFI
VND bn
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fertilizer sector capital structure
Equity Short-term debt
Long-term debt Payables
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fertilizer sector cash dividend history
Cash dividend Dividend yield
VND bn
Source: Stoxplus, KISVN research
Page 12
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
- As a cyclical sector, we noticed that the fertilizer industry’s P/E pattern goes
contradictorily with its business performance. To be more specific, in good years
such as 2011-2012, fertilizer sector P/E shrunk to around 5-6 times – indicating a
negative outlook for the outstandingly peaked earnings of many producers. While in
bad years such as 2016 – 2017, fertilizer sector P/E rose significantly to currently
around 9 times due to both sharp drop in earnings and higher market expectation on
the recovery of this sector.
- Thus, we have chosen P/B ratio as a more suitable measure to anticipate business
cycles of this industry because of: (1) high volatility in net earnings (2) capital-
intensive structure of these commodity manufacturers (3) lower intangible value than
consumer industry such as F&B, retail. At this contemporary point, the P/B ratio of
the whole industry is 1.4 times: 40% lower than the current rate of VNIndex and
around the bottom of previous period, which is quite undervalued with the current
bull market condition of Vietnam.
- In conclusion, we recommend OVERWEIGHT in long-term vision for fertilizer
industry because of attractive valuation, positive internal shifts plus some
government policy catalysts while having downside protection with dividends.
1.43
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5 Historical P/B Fertilizer Sector vs VNIndex VNIndex P/B
Fertilizer Sector P/B
8.91
-
5
10
15
20
25
Historical P/E Fertilizer Sector vs VNIndex VNIndex P/E
Fertilizer Sector P/E
Source: Bloomberg, KISVN research
Source: Bloomberg, KISVN research
Page 13
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
5. Stock Pick
No. Stock Company Product P/E P/B EV/EBITDA Dividend Recommend
1 DPM Dam Phu My Urea, NPK 11.82x 1.10x 6.29x 8.79% Overweight
2 DCM Dam Ca Mau Urea 9.00x 1.19x 3.77x 7.33% Neutral
3 BFC Binh Dien Fertilizer NPK 8.03x 2.38x 6.07x 4.91% Neutral
4 DHB Dam Ha Bac Urea - 1.78x - - Underweight
5 LAS Lam Thao Fertilizer NPK & Phosphate 11.10x 1.34x 6.56x 6.37% Neutral
6 DDV DAP Dinh Vu DAP - 1.10x - - Underweight
7 SFG Southern Fertilizer NPK & Phosphate 6.96x 1.13x 7.39x 4.27% Neutral
8 VAF Van Dien Fertilizer NPK & Phosphate 10.07x 0.98x 4.91x 8.44% Overweight
9 NFC Ninh Binh Fertilizer Phosphate 13.36x 1.33x 8.72x 6.25% Neutral
Source: KISVN , trailing 12 month number, updated 10-Oct-2017
Page 14
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
Stock Pick DPM VN
OVERWEIGHT
Market price (VND) 22,750
Target price (VND) 30,100
Annualized price return (%) 32.3%
Expected dividend yield (%) 8.8%
Expected return (%)
41.1%
Stock performance (%)
YTD 1m 3m 12m Absolute 1.6% -2.1% -3.4% -19.6% Relative -19.8% -3.1% -8.5% -38.7%
Stock Statistics 05-Oct-17 52-week range (VND) 21.1k-26.2k Shares o/s (m) 391.33 Mkt cap (VNDbn) 8,903 Mkt cap ($m) 391.34 Foreign % owned 20.84% Est. free float (mshrs) 137.8 3m avg (shrs) 317k VND/USD 22.750 Index: VN-Index/HNX 805/107
Ownership 05-Oct-17 PetroVietnam Group 59.59% Dragon Capital Group 9.34% Deutsche Bank AG 4.60% Van Eck Vectors ETF 1.51% BlackRock Group 1.08%
Source: Bloomberg
Petro Vietnam Fertilizer & Chemical Co. (HOSE: DPM) –
Long term catalysts by new NPK product and 0% VAT
while having limited downside risks
Pros:
The largest urea fertilizer company with 800,000 tons volume produced annually.
Moreover, DPM also has great competitive advantages of the exclusive
accessibility to gas source from nearby Cuu Long basin and the extensive
distribution network wide over Vietnam
Amid the industry shift, we highly appreciate the potentials of new NPK product
plant with 250,000 tons capacity. BOM estimates that 80% capacity will be fulfilled
in 2018 based on better product quality, strong marketing plan (in the early years,
price will be discounted by 10%-20% to only VND8,000-11,000 per kg, compared
to the average market price of VND10k-11k per kg). This will lead to additional
VND2,000bn revenue and VND300bn gross profit for 2018 result.
A positive plan to diversify revenue sources as DPM is developing basic
chemical projects (NH3, H2O2, polystyrene, and polypropylene). Management
states that these chemicals sales will contribute 50% of revenue in 2020.
The government supporting policy of VAT 0% imposed on fertilizer product will
boost approximately VND350bn annually to DPM pretax profit (equal to around
VND700 increase in EPS) thanks to VAT tax refund on gas input
Forced divestment by Prime Minister to reduce PVN’s stake in DPM to below
51% will create some room for management improvement.
Healthy financial condition with little debt (<10% equity), large cash on hand and
sustainable cash dividend policy. With dividend yield of currently 8.8%, long-term
investment in DPM is reasonable as downside risks are limited.
P/B is currently at 1.1 times, which we believe does not reflect the huge
intangible value of input autonomy and wide distribution network of DPM.
Cons:
Gloomy urea consumption picture, which is projected to grow only 1.5% CAGR
in the years ahead. DPM is also faced incoming risks of the market cannibalization
of DCM and Chinese low-price imported urea
Aside from floor price imposed by PVGas, input gas cost to DPM, which is
determined by formula: 0.46*MFO+0.96USD/MMBTU, will depend heavily on
fluctuations of global fuel oil (FO) price
If approved by Congress, VAT 0% policy will be effective only in Jan-2019.
According to management, new NPK product needs one year to breakeven
PVTex Dinh Vu project resolution is still “in the dark” and is out of control of
DPM. In the worst case, DPM is obligated to pay VND1.4 trillion debt of PVTex.
Recent stock sale of many members in board of management has put downward
pressure on stock price.
Valuation: Based on PBR multiple, we value DPM at VND30.1k per share in one
year ahead. Total return is 41.1%, including 8.8% dividend yield. OVERWEIGHT
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
20
23
26
29
32Price - VolumeVND '000 '000 shares
Page 15
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
DPM financials model
Unit: VND bn 2015 2016 2017E 2018E
Net Revenue 9,765 7,925 7,743 9,922
Sales growth (%) 2.3% -18.8% -2.3% 28.1%
Urea sales 6,171 5,513 4,898 5,034
New NPK sales - - - 2,000
Chemical & other fertilizer trading sales
3,594 2,411 2,845 2,888
COGS 6,612 5,529 5,645 7,233
Gross margin (%) 32.3% 30.2% 27.1% 27.1%
SG&A 1,348 1,235 1,254 1,607
EBITDA 1,921 1,277 992 1,347
EBITDA margin (%) 19.7% 16.1% 12.8% 13.6%
Depr’n&Amort’n 117 116 149 266
Operating profit 1,804 1,161 844 1,081
Operating margin (%) 18.5% 14.7% 10.9% 10.9%
Net interest expense -249 -224 -191 -162
As % of avg net debt
(incl capitalized interest) 4.7% 4.6% 5.0% 4.7%
Other profit/loss -173 9 -108 -108
Tax 358 228 185 227
Effective tax rate (%) 19.0% 16.4% 20.0% 20.0%
Net profit 1,522 1,165 741 909
Net margin (%) 15.6% 14.7% 9.6% 9.2%
Minorities 34 24 29 27
Net attributable profit 1,488 1,141 712 882
Number of shares (m) 380 391 391 391
EPS
(VND, bonus-adjusted) 4,538 3,389 2,358 2,759
EPS growth (%) 57.3% -25.3% -30.4% 17.0%
DPS (VND) 4000 3500 2500 2000
Payout ratio (%) 88.1% 103.3% 106.0% 72.5%
- EBITDA = Net revenue – (COGs -Depr’n&Amort’n)– SG&A expenses
- EBIT = EBITDA – Depr’n&Amort’n
- Net interest expenses = interest expenses – interest income
- Other profit/loss consists of other financial income/expenses, profit share
from JVs/associates and other income/loss
- Payout ratio = Dividend paid / Net attributable profit
BS & CF items (VNDbn) 2015 2016 2017E 2018E
Receivable turnover (x) 15.9 11.9 14.6 13.4
Inventory turnover (x) 4.5 4.7 4.6 4.7
Payable turnover (x) 4.2 3.2 3.8 3.5
Increase in WC -841 131 -68 -30
Capex 960 1,289 600 600
Other cashflow items 473 -951 0 0
Free cash flow 1,048 813 358 604
Share issues 0 114 0 0
Dividends paid 570 2,312 979 783
Increase in net debt -478 1,385 621 178
Net debt, end of year -5,539 -4,154 -3,533 -3,354
Enterprise value 3,558 4,925 5,574 5,780
Total equity 8,548 8,229 8,203 8,527
Minority interests 192 174 203 230
Shareholder’s equity 8,356 8,055 8,000 8,297
BVPS (VND) 21,988 20,581 20,439 21,198
Net debt / equity (%) -65% -50% -43% -39%
Net debt / EBITDA (x) -2.9 -3.3 -3.6 -2.5
Total assets 10,919 9,569 9,332 9,457
- Net debt = debts – cash & equivalent
Key ratio & valuation 2015 2016 2017E 2018E
ROE (%) (excl minority interest)
17% 14% 9% 11%
ROA (%) 14% 12% 8% 10%
ROIC (%) 38% 28% 13% 16%
WACC (%) 15% 15% 15% 15%
PER (x) 5.0 6.7 9.6 8.2
PBR (x) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
PSR (x) 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.9
EV/EBITDA (x) 1.9 3.9 5.6 4.3
EV/Sales (x) 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6
Dividend yield (%)
(bonus-adjusted) 17.6% 15.4% 11.0% 8.8%
Page 16
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
Contacts:
HCM City Head Office
Level 3, Maritime Bank Tower
180-192 Nguyen Cong Tru St., District 1, HCM City
Tel: (+84 8) 3914 8585
Fax: (+84 8) 3821 6898
Hanoi Branch
Level 6, CTM Tower
299 Cau Giay, Cau Giay District, Hanoi
Tel: (+84 4) 3974 4448
Fax: (+84 4) 3974 4501
Equity Research
Head of Equity Research
Mr. Huy Hoang, CFA
(+84 8) 3914 8585 (x1450)
Senior Associate –
Property, Agriculture,
Retailing
Mr. Trung Hoang, CPA
(+84 8) 3914 8585 (x1457)
Associate – Pharma,
Consumer, Chemical
Mr. Hoang Ha Nguyen
(+84 8) 3914 8585 (x1463)
Associate – Utilities,
Energy
Mr. Danh Nguyen
(+84 8) 3914 8585 (x1459)
Associate – Logistics,
Aviation, Automobile
Mr. Bao Vo
(+84 28)3914 8585 (x1460)
Macro Research
Head of Macro Research
Mr. Vien Bach
(+84 8) 3914 8585 (x1449)
Institutional Sales
Director, Sales
Ms. Uyen Lam
(+84 8) 3914 8585 (x1444)
Page 17
Industry Coverage – Fertilizer – OVERWEIGHT
Industry Coverage
KIS Vietnam Securities JSC
Bloomberg: KISVN <GO>
Our Recommendation System
OVERWEIGHT: where we believe prospective 12 month VND total return (including dividends) will be 15% or more.
NEUTRAL: where we believe it will be -5% to 15%.
UNDERWEIGHT: where we believe it will be -5% or less.
Disclaimer
This report has been issued by the KIS VN Securities Corporation (“KIS”) with the instructional contributions of KIS VN
Securities Corporation whose employees are specified in the publication. This report is for information of its institutional and
professional customers.
This report is and should not be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any
investment. No consideration has been given to the particular investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of
any recipient. Investors are advised make their own financial decisions based on their independent financial advisors as they
believe necessary and based on their particular circumstances such as their financial situation, investment objectives and
other considerations.
In preparing this report, we have relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all information available from
public and other sources which we believe to be reliable, but which we have not independently verified. KIS makes no
express or implied guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability as to the accuracy or
completeness of such information.
Opinions, estimates, and projections expressed are current opinions of the authors as of the original publication date
appearing on this report only and the information, including the opinions contained herein, and are subject to change without
notice.
KIS and its affiliates may from time to time perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or
other business from, companies mentioned herein. Further, KIS and its affiliates, and/or their officers, directors and
employees involved in the preparation or issuance of this report may, from time to time, have long or short positions in, and
buy or sell, the securities, or derivatives (including options) thereof, of companies mentioned herein, or related securities or
derivatives in a manner that may be consistent or inconsistent with this report and opinions expressed therein. As a result,
investors should be aware that KIS and its affiliates and/or their officers, directors and employees may have a conflict of
interest that could affect this report.
This report shall not be copied, reproduced, distributed (in whole or in part) or disclosed by recipients to any other person
without the express permission of KIS in writing.