randstad workmonitor q2 2018 - dansk hr€¦ · mobility malaysia +2, hong kong +1 and india +1;...

global report randstad workmonitor Q2 2018.

impact of a multi-generational workforce

|

contents

attitude toward direct manager

actual job change job change appetite job satisfaction

37 about the randstad workmonitor

41

© Randstad Workmonitor Q2 - June 2018 2

3

10

28

33

contact information

44

mobility index

17

multi-generational workforce

multi-generational

workforce.

| |

86% prefer to work in a multi-generational team.


Global 86%

Argentina 86%

Australia 89%

Austria 82%

Belgium 86%

Brazil 90%

Canada 89%

Chile 93%

China 89%

Czech Republic 85%

Denmark 86%

France 90%

Germany 88%

Greece 78%

Hong Kong 78%

Hungary 82%

India 92%

Italy 84%

Japan 69%

Luxembourg 89%

Malaysia 90%

Mexico 89%

New Zealand 89%

Norway 89%

Poland 80%

Portugal 89%

Singapore 87%

Spain 89%

Sweden 73%

Switzerland 88%

The Netherlands 84%

Turkey 88%

UK 87%

US 90%

Romania 92%

| |

85% state that they come up with innovative ideas and solutions, thanks to an age-diverse team.


Global 85%

Argentina 86%

Australia 84%

Austria 82%

Belgium 79%

Brazil 90%

Canada 88%

Chile 90%

China 94%

Czech Republic 75%

Denmark 84%

France 86%

Germany 85%

Greece 74%

Hong Kong 82%

Hungary 75%

India 94%

Italy 92%

Japan 46%

Luxembourg 83%

Malaysia 90%

Mexico 92%

New Zealand 84%

Norway 94%

Poland 82%

Portugal 88%

Singapore 83%

Spain 86%

Sweden 82%

Switzerland 82%

The Netherlands 85%

Turkey 92%

UK 84%

US 87%

Romania 91%

| |

85% confirm to work in a multi-generational team (i.e., 10-15 years difference in age).


Global 85%

Argentina 87%

Australia 87%

Austria 85%

Belgium 88%

Brazil 87%

Canada 88%

Chile 91%

China 85%

Czech Republic 88%

Denmark 87%

France 87%

Germany 88%

Greece 79%

Hong Kong 80%

Hungary 84%

India 82%

Italy 74%

Japan 66%

Luxembourg 91%

Malaysia 84%

Mexico 87%

New Zealand 91%

Norway 87%

Poland 88%

Portugal 88%

Singapore 85%

Spain 83%

Sweden 85%

Switzerland 89%

The Netherlands 91%

Turkey 69%

UK 85%

US 87%

Romania 87%

| |

85% believe that the collaboration between generations is mutually beneficial at their company.


Global 85%

Argentina 85%

Australia 86%

Austria 85%

Belgium 81%

Brazil 86%

Canada 90%

Chile 91%

China 91%

Czech Republic 86%

Denmark 87%

France 86%

Germany 85%

Greece 80%

Hong Kong 81%

Hungary 76%

India 89%

Italy 79%

Japan 55%

Luxembourg 87%

Malaysia 91%

Mexico 91%

New Zealand 86%

Norway 91%

Poland 84%

Portugal 87%

Singapore 84%

Spain 88%

Sweden 83%

Switzerland 84%

The Netherlands 87%

Turkey 89%

UK 86%

US 90%

Romania 88%

| |

80% feel that the main difference with working in a multi-generational workplace is the communication styles.


Global 80%

Argentina 87%

Australia 79%

Austria 70%

Belgium 77%

Brazil 85%

Canada 82%

Chile 87%

China 93%

Czech 83%

Denmark 67%

France 77%

Germany 75%

Greece 84%

Hong Kong 87%

Hungary 68%

India 90%

Italy 73%

Japan 64%

Luxembourg 81%

Malaysia 90%

Mexico 85%

New Zealand 76%

Norway 69%

Poland 71%

Portugal 81%

Singapore 86%

Spain 79%

Sweden 67%

Switzerland 78%

The Netherlands 85%

Turkey 86%

UK 76%

US 81%

Romania 91%

| |

31% find it difficult to communicate with coworkers who are not from their generation or in their age group.


Global 31%

Argentina 20%

Australia 34%

Austria 21%

Belgium 32%

Brazil 29%

Canada 31%

Chile 22%

China 45%

Czech Republic 20%

Denmark 22%

France 36%

Germany 31%

Greece 30%

Hong Kong 61%

Hungary 22%

India 49%

Italy 26%

Japan 42%

Luxembourg 20%

Malaysia 47%

Mexico 29%

New Zealand 25%

Norway 21%

Poland 30%

Portugal 21%

Singapore 44%

Spain 31%

Sweden 26%

Switzerland 24%

The Netherlands 22%

Turkey 40%

UK 31%

US 38%

Romania 19%

attitude toward

direct manager.

| |

83% believe that their direct manager’s age is not important, as long as they are inspirational.


Global 83%

Argentina 83%

Australia 85%

Austria 79%

Belgium 79%

Brazil 87%

Canada 85%

Chile 86%

China 81%

Czech Republic 87%

Denmark 88%

France 79%

Germany 80%

Greece 75%

Hong Kong 81%

Hungary 77%

India 88%

Italy 85%

Japan 70%

Luxembourg 85%

Malaysia 82%

Mexico 85%

New Zealand 86%

Norway 83%

Poland 82%

Portugal 90%

Singapore 82%

Spain 87%

Sweden 80%

Switzerland 83%

The Netherlands 85%

Turkey 74%

UK 80%

US 84%

Romania 84%

| |

69% prefer their direct manager to be their age or older.


Global 69%

Argentina 75%

Australia 68%

Austria 60%

Belgium 58%

Brazil 61%

Canada 70%

Chile 67%

China 85%

Czech Republic 77%

Denmark 58%

France 64%

Germany 66%

Greece 82%

Hong Kong 86%

Hungary 72%

India 80%

Italy 70%

Japan 79%

Luxembourg 66%

Malaysia 81%

Mexico 78%

New Zealand 62%

Norway 53%

Poland 47%

Portugal 59%

Singapore 79%

Spain 70%

Sweden 64%

Switzerland 63%

The Netherlands 52%

Turkey 77%

UK 75%

US 76%

Romania 64%

| |

77% say their direct manager is talented at working together with various generations.


Global 77%

Argentina 74%

Australia 75%

Austria 71%

Belgium 78%

Brazil 79%

Canada 82%

Chile 77%

China 84%

Czech Republic 69%

Denmark 79%

France 79%

Germany 76%

Greece 65%

Hong Kong 76%

Hungary 73%

India 91%

Italy 73%

Japan 57%

Luxembourg 82%

Malaysia 83%

Mexico 84%

New Zealand 80%

Norway 83%

Poland 81%

Portugal 74%

Singapore 71%

Spain 77%

Sweden 72%

Switzerland 73%

The Netherlands 83%

Turkey 77%

UK 75%

US 83%

Romania 74%

| |

69% believe that their direct manager cares about their career path.


Global 69%

Argentina 70%

Australia 64%

Austria 70%

Belgium 64%

Brazil 68%

Canada 71%

Chile 72%

China 81%

Czech Republic 45%

Denmark 73%

France 64%

Germany 70%

Greece 64%

Hong Kong 69%

Hungary 65%

India 87%

Italy 72%

Japan 41%

Luxembourg 60%

Malaysia 79%

Mexico 80%

New Zealand 74%

Norway 75%

Poland 64%

Portugal 66%

Singapore 64%

Spain 68%

Sweden 68%

Switzerland 61%

The Netherlands 70%

Turkey 74%

UK 62%

US 76%

Romania 65%

| |

61% claim to be connected on personal social media such as facebook or instagram with their colleagues.


Global 61%

Argentina 78%

Australia 45%

Austria 55%

Belgium 54%

Brazil 86%

Canada 49%

Chile 69%

China 84%

Czech Republic 57%

Denmark 59%

France 36%

Germany 46%

Greece 72%

Hong Kong 55%

Hungary 78%

India 86%

Italy 56%

Japan 19%

Luxembourg 61%

Malaysia 70%

Mexico 74%

New Zealand 51%

Norway 76%

Poland 65%

Portugal 72%

Singapore 55%

Spain 58%

Sweden 65%

Switzerland 43%

The Netherlands 50%

Turkey 82%

UK 51%

US 54%

Romania 77%

| |

35% claim to be connected on personal social media such as facebook or instagram with their direct manager.


Global 35%

Argentina 42%

Australia 22%

Austria 25%

Belgium 23%

Brazil 58%

Canada 24%

Chile 33%

China 66%

Czech Republic 30%

Denmark 25%

France 13%

Germany 25%

Greece 44%

Hong Kong 34%

Hungary 54%

India 67%

Italy 30%

Japan 10%

Luxembourg 28%

Malaysia 45%

Mexico 46%

New Zealand 22%

Norway 44%

Poland 36%

Portugal 40%

Singapore 28%

Spain 32%

Sweden 27%

Switzerland 15%

The Netherlands 26%

Turkey 56%

UK 27%

US 32%

Romania 45%

mobility

index.

| |

the global mobility index slightly increased compared to last quarter.

questions: • do you think you will

be doing the same or comparable work for a different employer within the next 6 months?

• do you think you will be doing different work for a different employer within the next 6 months?


80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Global

| |

mobility belgium +3; netherlands -1 and luxembourg -1.





60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Belgium Luxembourg The Netherlands

| |

mobility us +5 and canada +2; mexico +1.





90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Canada Mexico US

| |

mobility brazil +4 and argentina +2; chile -3.





100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Argentina Brazil Chile

| |

mobility australia +2; new zealand -2.





90

95

100

105

110

115

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Australia New Zealand

| |

mobility malaysia +2, hong kong +1 and india +1; china -4, japan -1 and singapore no shift.





80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

China Hong Kong India Japan Malaysia Singapore

| |

mobility sweden -4, norway -2 and denmark -1.





70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Denmark Norway Sweden

| |

mobility poland +7; czech republic -5 and hungary -2.





70

80

90

100

110

120

130

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Czech Hungary Poland Romania

| |

mobility switzerland +2; france -5, germany -3, austria -2; the uk no shift.





70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Austria France Germany Switzerland UK

| |

mobility turkey +9, italy +4, greece +3 and spain +2; portugal -1.





80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Greece Italy Portugal Spain Turkey

actual

job change.

| |

the actual job change did not change compared to last quarter.

question: • have you changed jobs

during the past six months? If you have started working in your first job during the past six months, this is not a change of employement/ employer; please fill in 'no'.


0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

2015

Q3

2015

Q4

2016

Q1

2016

Q2

2016

Q3

2016

Q4

2017

Q1

2017

Q2

2017

Q3

2017

Q4

2018

Q1

2018

Q2

Global

| |

actual job change highest in india; lowest in luxembourg and romania.


Yes, I currently work in a comparable position at another employer Yes, I currently work in a different position at the same employer Yes, I currently work in a different position at a different employer No, I did not change positions or employers during the past 6 months

• in Canada, Mexico, Poland, Singapore and Turkey, job change increased.

• job change decreased in Australia,

China, Czech Republic and Italy compared to last quarter.

Argentina 10% 6% 4%

80%

Australia 12% 8% 5%

76%

Austria 8% 3% 4%

85%

Belgium 9% 3% 4%

84%

Brazil 13% 7% 6%

74%

Canada 12% 4% 5%

79%

Chile 6% 5% 8%

81%

China 15% 10% 3%

72%

Czech Republic 7% 2% 5%

86%

Denmark 10% 6% 4%

80%

France 12% 7% 4%

78%

Germany 8% 11% 2%

79%

Greece 12% 7% 6%

75%

Hong Kong 19% 8% 5%

68%

| |

actual job change.



Hungary 7% 5% 7%

81%

India 24% 17% 6%

53%

Italy 8% 7% 2%

84%

Japan 10% 3% 6%

82%

Luxembourg 4% 2% 2%

92%

Malaysia 19% 11% 9%

61%

Mexico 12% 8% 2%

78%

New Zealand 10% 4% 6%

81%

Norway 8% 6% 6%

80%

Poland 12% 5% 6%

77%

Portugal 7% 4% 5%

84%

Romania 7% 2% 3%

88%

Singapore 12% 7% 7%

74%

Spain 10% 5% 3%

83%

| |

actual job change.



Sweden 12% 6% 4%

79%

Switzerland 11% 4% 4%

81%

The Netherlands 10% 7% 3%

80%

Turkey 16% 9% 4%

71%

UK 11% 6% 5%

78%

US 19% 5% 3%

73%

job change

appetite.

| |

job change appetite highest in india (22%); lowest in turkey (16%).


• job change appetite increased in Australia, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, the UK and the US compared to last quarter.

• in Italy the job change appetite decreased.

I am actively applying for jobs

I am specifically orientating myself

I am looking round a bit

I am not actively doing so, but if something were to come up I would be open to it I am not actively doing so

Argentina 7% 7%

19% 35% 32%

Australia 6% 5%

23% 29% 37%

Austria 2% 1%

14% 24% 59%

Belgium 3% 3%

16% 25% 53%

Brazil 4% 13% 9%

32% 41%

Canada 2% 3%

21% 30% 44%

Chile 7% 8%

14% 30% 41%

China 3% 13% 13% 45% 26%

Czech Republic 2% 4%

16% 33% 45%

Denmark 5% 5%

19% 25% 45%

France 2% 4%

17% 24% 52%

Germany 2% 4%

18% 25% 50%

Greece 3% 7%

21% 35% 33%

Hong Kong 4% 9%

13% 45% 30%

| |

job change appetite.






Hungary 2% 4%

20% 37% 37%

India 12% 9%

21% 39% 19%

Italy 2% 5%

19% 33% 41%

Japan 1% 4%

15% 23% 57%

Luxembourg 1% 3%

14% 21% 61%

Malaysia 8% 8%

17% 44% 24%

Mexico 2% 7%

18% 44% 29%

New Zealand 5% 3%

18% 33% 41%

Norway 6% 5%

15% 34% 40%

Poland 2% 13% 18% 31% 36%

Portugal 4% 6%

12% 33% 44%

Romania 5% 2%

25% 27% 40%

Singapore 5% 3%

23% 43% 25%

Spain 5% 10% 14% 25% 46%

| |

job change appetite.






Sweden 6% 6%

18% 29% 41%

Switzerland 5% 5%

18% 30% 42%

The Netherlands 3% 4%

20% 26% 46%

Turkey 3% 4% 9%

42% 42%

UK 5% 5%

24% 31% 36%

US 8% 7%

21% 26% 38%

job

satisfaction.

| |

job satisfaction highest in mexico (84%); lowest in japan (50%).


(very) satisfied

not satisfied, but not dissatisfied either

(very) dissatisfied

don't know

• job satisfaction increased in Italy and Japan, but decreased in Belgium, Canada, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Portugal, Singapore, Sweden and Switzerland compared to last quarter.

Argentina 69% 18% 13% 1%

Australia 72% 18% 9% 1%

Austria 81% 12% 6% 0%

Belgium 66% 22% 11% 1%

Brazil 75% 16% 9%

Canada 75% 19% 6% 0%

Chile 72% 18% 10%

China 67% 27% 5% 0%

Czech Republic 63% 26% 11%

Denmark 78% 15% 6% 1%

France 67% 21% 11% 1%

Germany 69% 22% 8% 1%

Greece 68% 23% 9% 0%

Hong Kong 47% 38% 14% 1%

| |

job satisfaction.


(very) satisfied


(very) dissatisfied

don't know

Hungary 62% 27% 10% 1%

India 80% 17% 3%

Italy 68% 19% 12% 1%

Japan 50% 27% 20% 4%

Luxembourg 77% 16% 6% 0%

Malaysia 69% 21% 9% 1%

Mexico 84% 12% 5%

New Zealand 70% 19% 10% 1%

Norway 79% 15% 5% 0%

Poland 75% 20% 5% 1%

Portugal 66% 21% 13% 0%

Romania 72% 20% 8%

Singapore 58% 30% 12% 1%

Spain 73% 20% 8%

| |

job satisfaction.


(very) satisfied


(very) dissatisfied

don't know

Sweden 69% 19% 10% 2%

Switzerland 73% 18% 10% 0%

The Netherlands 77% 17% 5% 1%

Turkey 75% 17% 8% 0%

UK 72% 18% 10%

US 80% 12% 7% 0%

about the

randstad workmonitor.

| |

about the randstad workmonitor.

• The Randstad Workmonitor was launched in the Netherlands in 2003, then in Germany, and covers 34 countries around the world. The study encompasses Europe, Asia Pacific and the Americas. The Randstad Workmonitor is published four times a year, making both local and global trends in mobility visible over time.

• The Workmonitor’s Mobility Index, which tracks employee confidence and captures the likelihood of an employee changing jobs within the next 6 months, provides a comprehensive understanding of sentiments and trends in the job market. Besides mobility, the survey addresses employee satisfaction and personal motivation as well as a rotating set of themed questions.


| |

about the randstad workmonitor.

• The study is conducted online among employees aged 18-65, working a minimum of 24 hours a week in a paid job (not self-employed). Minimum sample size is 400 interviews per country. The Survey Sampling International (SSI) panel is used for sampling purposes.

• The second survey of 2018 was conducted from 23 April until 14 May 2018 in the following countries:


Argentina Denmark Luxembourg Spain

Australia France Malaysia Sweden

Austria Germany Mexico Switzerland

Belgium Greece New Zealand The Netherlands

Brazil Hong Kong Norway Turkey

Canada Hungary Poland UK

Chile India Portugal US

China Italy Romania

Czech Republic Japan Singapore

contact information. randstad Group Marketing & Communications [email protected] +31 (0)20 569 5623

media enquiries Ingrid Pouw [email protected] +31 (0)20 569 1732

research Max Wright [email protected] +31 (0)6 1229 7221

mailto:[email protected]?subject=Randstad Workmonitor



randstad workmonitor q2 2018 - dansk hr€¦ · mobility malaysia +2, hong kong +1 and india +1;...

Documents