Analysis of Quality Scorecard – Up To May-2015

Department Maximum score Goal Achieved

score Jan Feb March Apr May Result Responsible

01. Quality Assurance dept.    

aChemical test rejection% (H&M)// 2014's stop order was related for chemical

fault, it will count this year.

0 100% 0 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Not achieved

Mrs. Akhi

bPhysical test rejection% (H&M in-house, pick up

bulk goods by hm responsible) // complain about pilling (may-15)

5 95% 5 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Achieved

cLab performance %

(Audit H&M, physical color test)

2.5 100% 2.5 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Achieved "

dChemical & color

performance (Audit H&M, On ECR+color lab)

2.5 100% 0.5       67% 67% not achieved Mr. Mamun

    10   8              

Continue……………..Department

Maximum

score Goal Achieve

d score Jan Feb March Apr May Avg. Result Responsible

02. Sample Quality   

a Development sample rejection % 3 100% 3   100% 100% 100

%100% 100% achieved Mr. Mobin

b Quatation sample rejection % 4.5 95% 4.5   90% 100% 98% 100% 98.13% Achieved "

c Size set sample rejection % 4.5 100% 0   89% 100% 100% 97% 97.30% Not

achieved "

d Counter sample rejection % 3 100% 0     100% 100% 94% 96.15% Not

achieved ,,

    15   7.5              

03. RQS                    

a RQS score 45 100 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 achieved Mr. Abraham

    45   38              

Continue……………..Department

Maximum

score Goal Achieved

score Jan Feb March Apr May Avg. Result Responsible

04. Quality Control    

a Initial / Inline rejection% 5 95% 0 93% 85% 86% 99% 98% 92.44% not

achieved

Mr. Utpal,

Swapon, Nazrul

b Final inspection rejection % 5 98% 5 95% 100% 100% 96% 100% 98.39% Achieved

c NQC score check inline/ final   N/A              

d NQC score   N/A              

    10   5              

05. Stop order                    

aStop order

(2014's stop order will adding this year)

10No stop order

0No stop order

No stop order

No stop order

No stop order

No stop order

Not Achieved All department

  In-total = 90   58.5              

Inspection data analysis

H&M QC's report Up to May’2015 (Initial & inline fail %)

Unit Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

Metro-01 H&M 15.38% 57.14% 15.91% 0.00% 4% 14.93%

Metro-02 H&M 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Beacon-02 H&M 6.25% 7.50% 13.79% 3.57% 2.94% 6.80%

H&M QC's report Up to May’2015 (Final fail %)

Unit Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

Metro-01 H&M 100.00% nill 0.00% 0.00% 0% 6.67%

Metro-02 H&M 0% 0% 0.00% 0% 0% 0%

Beacon-02 H&M 4.17% 0.00% 0.00% 4.55% 0% 1.56%

Buyer wise Inspection data analysis (Trial+Inline fail %)

Unit Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

Metro-01

H&M 13.59% 8.86% 9.09% 7.25% 5.70% 8.14%

Promodoro 13.33% 6.67% no rep no rep 10.53% 9.38%

Ostin 0% 0% no rep 0% 0% 0.00%

INA     0% 0% 0% 0.00%

Metro-02

H&M 24.27% 14.15% 14.55% 2.42% 5.11% 13.32%

GU   0% 1.28% 0% 0% 0.54%

LERROS   40.63% 37.14% 69.23% 14.29% 41.23%

Calzedonia   12.50% No rep 0% 0% 4.76%

Echo       100% 33.33% 45.45%

Beacon-02H&M 6.25% 7.50% 13.79% 3.57% 2.94% 6.80%

Varner No rep 50% 40% 8.70% 27.78% 26.77%

Buyer wise Inspection data analysis (Pre-final + Final) fail %

Unit Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

Metro-01

H&M 2.21% 0.88% 2.08% 3.21% 3.29% 2.25%

Promodoro 9.09% 4.76% 1.82 4.84% 10.34% 4.96%

Ostin 0% 0% No rep 0% 0% 0.00%

INA     0% 0% 0% 0.00%

Metro-02

H&M 0% 0% 3.45% 0% 0.51% 0.36%

GU   1.82% 1.50% 0% 0% 1.23%

LERROS   0% 0% 0% 0% 0.00%

Calzedonia   0% nill 18.18% 0% 10.53%

Echo         0% 0.00%

Beacon-02H&M 6.25% 5.77% 2.23% 7.82% 3.97% 5.65%

Varner 1.96% 0.00% 2% 9.09% 5.94% 4.27%

Sewing & Finishing alter & spot % data analysis up to May’2015

Sewing alter & spot %(Goal below 5%)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%

13%12% 12%

15%14% 13%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8% 7%

8%

6%5% 5%

6%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.5%

6%

7%7%

6% 6% 6% 6%6%

Finishing alter & spot %(Goal below 3%)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%20%

14% 14% 14%

20%18%

16%

Metro-01

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%20%

15%

20%

15%13%

10%

15%

Metro-02

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%

15%

11%13% 14%

9%

12%

Beacon-02

Sewing & Finishing Rejection% data analysis up to May’2015

Sewing Rejection % -- Goal below 1%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0.00%

0.10%

0.20%

0.30%

0.40%

0.50%

0.60%

0.38%0.43% 0.42%

0.55%

0.34%0.42%

Metro-01

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0.00%0.05%0.10%0.15%0.20%0.25%0.30%

0.28%0.26%

0.19% 0.19%0.23% 0.23%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0.00%0.05%0.10%0.15%0.20%0.25%0.30%0.35%0.40%0.45% 0.40%

0.28%0.32%

0.45%

0.20%

0.33%

Finishing Rejection % -- Goal below 1%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0.00%0.10%0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%0.80%

0.61%

0.48% 0.46%

0.76%

0.60% 0.58%

Metro-01

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0.00%0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%

1.24%

1.54%

1.26%

0.86%

0.51%

1.08%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.0.00%0.10%0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%0.80%0.90%

0.87% 0.89%

0.43% 0.47% 0.47%

0.63%

Beacon-02

Print Panel Short & Rejection % -- Goal below 2%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

4.00%2.

13%

1.35

%

2.44

%

1.89

%

1.88

%

2.49

%

2.62

%

3.39

%

1.48

%

3.22

%

1.74

%

1.55

%

2.34

%

0.96

%

0.66

%

2.09

%

1.88

%

2.76

%

1.44

%

2.07

%

Metro-01

Metro-02

Beacon-02

Average

INHOUSE CHEST PRINT TEST FAIL % (Mercer Lab)

Buyer Test stage Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

H&MSample 8% 0% 6% 0% 4% 3.45%

Trial 23% 12% 17% 0% 40% 18.60%Bulk 7% 6% 3% 4% 12% 7.57%

GUSample 27% 30% 5% 0% 5% 11.88%

OTM/Trial 19% 19% 19% 20% 6% 16.58%Bulk 13% 17% 9% 7% 5% 11.38%

VarnerSample 20% 0% 14% 0% 0% 6.56%

Trial 25% 50% 0% 33% 0% 38.71%Bulk 0% 21% 0% 11% 9% 14.10%

LerrosSample 11% 0% 11%   0% 5.56%

Trial 0% 0% 0%   0% 0.00%Bulk 0% 5% 0%   0% 2.86%

OstinSample 55% 33% 11% 25%   27.03%

Trial 37% 20% 33% 9%   23.33%Bulk 39% 9% 16% 0%   16.48%

CazledoniaSample     0% 0% 0% 0.00%

Trial     33% 0% 0% 16.67%Bulk     0% 0% 29% 20.00%

INASample     0% 0%   0.00%

Trial     0% 0%   0.00%Bulk     0% 0%   0.00%

Cut Panel Rejection Summary up to May-2015

Slub

Hol

e

Y/C

Lyc

ra o

ut

Mis

yar

n

N/M

ark

All

spot

Num

ber

...

Tes

t rej

ect

Loo

p

Dia

shor

t

Mis

s pri

nt

Oil

spot

Softn

er sp

ot

Cre

ase

...

Oth

ers

4384

42935

2652 26467335 9174

15852

466 621 1383

37052

15070

83 162 1603516

Category wise rejection qty (pcs) ( Included 3 units )

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

2.63%

2.02%1.77%

1.85%

2.20% 2.09%

Month wise rejection %(3units included)

Buyer wise 3rd party physical test fail %

H&

M

GU

, eac

h co

lor

GU

, bul

k

osti

n

varn

er

Prom

odor

o

Calz

edon

ia

INA

4.88%8.78%

14.75%

0.00%

20.79%

11.54%

50.00%

20.00%

Data Analysis of Sample Section

Sample 3rd PARTY TEST FAIL %Buyer Sample stage Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

H&M

Development samp.   0% 0% 0% 0% 0.00%Quatation sample   10% 0% 2% 0% 1.87%Size set sample   11% 0% 0% 3.45% 2.70%Counter sample   0% 0% 0% 6.25% 3.85%

GU

Development samp.       0% 0% 0.00%APP sample       0% 0% 0.00%

Each color sample         0% 0.00%

Varner

Development samp.         no rep no rep Photo sample         0% 0.00%

Size set sample         0% 0.00%PP sample       0% 0% 0.00%

Ostin

1st sample         no rep no rep PBI sample       0% no rep 0.00%PPS sample         no rep no rep 

INA

Photo sample       0% no rep 0.00%Sales man sample         no rep no rep 

Size set         no rep no rep 

Calzedonia

PP Sample         0% 0.00%Photo sample         16.67% 16.67%

Size set sample         0% 0.00%

INHOUSE SAMPLE FAIL %Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

H&M     1.76% 0.87% 1.82% 1.45%

GU     0% 0% 1.60% 0.75%

Varner     0% 0% 1.23% 0.86%

Ostin     0% 0% 5.56% 1.92%

INA     0% 28.57% 0% 11.76%

Calzedonia     0% 0% 3.57% 2.63%

Promodoro       0% 0% 0.00%

AVERAGE =     0.93% 0.58% 2.12% 1.38%

ONTIME SAMPLE SUBMISSION DELAY %

Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

H&M   88% 88.00% 93.00% 93.49% 91.04%

GU   80% 84% 46% 93.04% 79.72%

Varner   33% 91% 100% 98.71% 97.35%

Ostin   75% 100% 100% 83.33% 91.84%

INA     100% 100% 100% 100.00%

Calzedonia     50% 100% 85.18% 80.56%

Promodoro       100% 100% 100.00%

Average =   85.62% 87.79% 84.84% 94.27% 89.92%Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

85.62%

87.79%

84.84%

94.27%

89.92%

Month wise average delay %

Supplementary Analysis (Include 3 Units), Up to May-2015

Category wise SupplementaryMetro-1 Metro-2 Beacon-2 In-total

Cut Panel 2612 485 1189 4286Screen Print 524 454 275 1253

Dyeing bal./problem 150     150Washing   127   127Dia + / - 509     509

GSM + / - 110 678 332 1120Complete gmts rejection   123 241 364Supplementary balance        

Pcs cut wash        Complete gmts shading        Consumption problem 1297     1297

Fabric return       0uneven/running shade 66   374 440

AOP problem 1800     1800cutting        

Pattern increase        Technical        

Rib 268 149   417Others   185   185

IN-TOTAL 7336 2201 2411 11948Fabric delivery (kg) 407256 297953 251,805 957014

Supplementary % 1.80% 0.74% 0.96% 1.25%

Month wise supplementary % (Included 3 units)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.

1.58%

0.95%

0.65%0.79%

1.25%

1.04%

Month wise supplementary % (3 units included)

Indent Nonconforming Report –Metro Unit-2

Date Buyer Order No Style Access. Name Correct information Mistake on indent Merchandis

erCause of

Nonconfirm

17.05.15 H&M 234550 Mario Pattern Trow. CARE LABEL SATEN REBON

BLACKSATEN REBON

OFF WHITE Riblu  

" " " " ME LABEL " " "  

21.05.15 GU 603245F028A

W S Graphic T shirt Interlining Sample has

Interlining. Not required Rony saha  

24.05.15 H&M 250010 Lisa Pj Kaff Label GB &DE DE Country Not Required Riblu  

" " 251013 " " " " "  

27.05.15 GU 60275F056A

W S SWEATER LONG WOOLY TAPE Sample use Not required Rony saha  

25.05.15 " GM 000A C NECK CARE Label ITEM CODE (52-05)

ITEM CODE (52-01) SHAKIL Order Wrong

" " GM001 V NECK " ITEM CODE (52-04)

ITEM CODE (52-01) SHAKIL Order Wrong

30.05.15 " 60245F049A   " ITEM CODE(53-

03)ITEM CODE(53-

01) ASAD Order Wrong

Thanks……….