qualitative research2
TRANSCRIPT
•
•
–
–
–
–
–
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
–
–
–
•
•
•
±
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
–
–
–
•
–
–
•
–
•
•
•
•
–
•
•
•
–
–
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
–
–
•
–
–
–
Inputs
Question
Participants
Information
Appropriate indications for TURP
Consultant urologists and GP
Literature review and first ranking sheets
ProcessMethod ofStructuringInteraction
First round of nominal group:Participants rank whether intervention is indicated or notResult are summarized by median & range.
Second round of nominal group:Participants meet, discuss and re-rank whether intervention is indicated or not
Method of synthesizing
individual judgment
Results analyzed for agreement using pre-defined rules
Indications for TURP disseminated to relevant surgeons by report in clinical literature and elsewhere
Output
•
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
•
–
•
•
•
–
–
•
•
•
–
–
–
–
•