primary goal
DESCRIPTION
Primary Goal. I - I dentification/Screening1 month D - D iagnosis/Evaluation3 months E - E arly Intervention6 months A - A dditional Assessment(s) L - L inking to (2 days) A - A ppropriate S - S ervices A – A nd45 days P – P rograms. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Primary Goal
• I - Identification/Screening 1 month• D - Diagnosis/Evaluation 3 months• E - Early Intervention 6 months• A - Additional Assessment(s)• L - Linking to (2 days)• A - Appropriate • S - Services • A – And 45 days• P – Programs
![Page 2: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Percent of Neonates Screened - 1993
>90%
75-89%
60-74%
40-59%
25-39%
10-24%
5-9%
< 5%NCHAM
![Page 3: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Percent of Neonates Screened - 1995
>90%
75-89%
60-74%
40-59%
25-39%
10-24%
5-9%
< 5%NCHAM
![Page 4: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Percent of Neonates Screened - 1996
>90%
75-89%
60-74%
40-59%
25-39%
10-24%
5-9%
< 5%NCHAM
![Page 5: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Percent of Neonates Screened - 1997
>90%
75-89%
60-74%
40-59%
25-39%
10-24%
5-9%
< 5%
![Page 6: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Percent of Neonates Screened - 1998
>90%
75-89%
60-74%
40-59%
25-39%
10-24%
5-9%
< 5%
![Page 7: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Percent of Neonates Screened - 1999
>90%
75-89%
60-74%
40-59%
25-39%
10-24%
5-9%
< 5%NCHAM survey, 2000
![Page 8: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Percent of Babies Screened - 2000
>90%
75-89%
60-74%
40-59%
25-39%
10-24%
5-9%
< 5%NCHAM survey, 2000
![Page 9: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Early Hearing Detection and InterventionProgression of States towards Universal Newborn Hearing
Screening
1993 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
Num
ber
of S
tate
s
<5% 6-9% 10-24% 15-39%
40-59% 60-74% 75-89% >90%
![Page 10: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Average Age in Months
3
3
35
19
30
30
24
25
31
56
Coplan (1987)
Eissman et al. (1987)
Gustason (1987)
Meadow-Orlans (1987)
Yoshinago-Itano (1995)
Stein et al. (1990)
Mace et al. (1991)
O'Neil (1996)
Johnson et al. (1997)*
Vohr et al. (1998)*
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
*reports from programs with established statewide newborn hearing screening systems
Confirmation of Hearing Loss
![Page 11: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Hawai'i EHDI ProgressAge of Identification and Intervention
Zero to Three Project
pre 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Age in
Month
s
Identification Intervention
![Page 12: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Pediatric Evaluations
• Use a combination of behavioral and objective tests to obtain frequency-specific, ear-specific, and family/child-specific information
• Ensure that referral sources have audiologists and associated professionals with appropriate knowledge and skills to perform pediatric evaluations and that the facility has the necessary instrumentation for the audiologists to obtain the necessary information
![Page 13: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Basic Pediatric Auditory Evaluation
• Case History and Parental Report• Related Screenings / Referral Information• Age-appropriate Behavioral Assessment Protocols• Objective Assessment Protocols• Integration and Interpretation of Results• Counseling with Family and Professionals• Recommendations• Referrals
![Page 14: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Ensuring Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of Hearing Loss
• Develop collaborative efforts of hospitals and community referral sources
• Monitor data management, tracking and follow-up procedures
• Collect accurate contact information with a back-up (family member, friend, email address, cell phone number, etc.)
• Establish a brief time-frame between screening and follow-up measures
![Page 15: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Timely Diagnosis (cont.)
• Clearly communicate follow-up procedures and schedule appointments with families –if possible, before they leave the facility
• Enlist support from medical community (pediatricians, medical home, etc.)
• Ensure proper training for all personnel in the EHDI program
• Address cultural and diversity issues as applicable for each phase of the EHDI program
![Page 16: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Benchmarks (JCIH, 2000)
• Newborns screened by 1 month• Infants with hearing loss identified by 3 months• Infants enrolled in family-centered EI by 6 months• Professionals are knowledgeable• Amplification use begins within 1 month of
diagnosis• Ongoing audiological management - not to exceed
3 month intervals
![Page 17: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Timeframe for Communication
• PL 105-17: IDEA– Referral for evaluation must be made to a
public agency within 2 working days of identification
– IFSP must be developed by a multidisciplinary team within 45 days of receiving the referral
• State and local policies and procedures
![Page 18: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Using the Team Approach
• Developing and identifying professional interactions to ensure that families receive sensitive, timely, seamless service between screening, evaluation and early intervention services.
• Communication ACCESS is viewed as the key element for developing successful communication skills.
![Page 19: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Information Wanted vs. Received by Parents at Hearing Loss ConfirmationInformation Wanted vs. Received by Parents at Hearing Loss Confirmation
Martin, George, O'Neal, & Daly (1987); *Sweetow & Barrager (1980)
Degree of loss
Auditory system
Amplification
Educational options
Speech/Lang dev
Etiology
Home activities
*Written Information
*Financial Support
*Emotional Support
*Parent Contacts
*Referral Sources
0 20 40 60 80 100
Wanted
Received
![Page 20: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
What do Parents Want?
• Early identification of hearing loss
• Timely receipt of test results
• Professional service and interactions
• Information (verbal and written)
• Emotional support
Summary - Uzcategui & Yoshinaga-Itano & SKI*HI
![Page 21: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Parents’ Advice for Professionals
• Listen to us!
• Be knowledgeable
• Be honest
• Be professional
• Tell us everything
Mertens, D. M., Sass-Lehrer, M., & Scott-Olson, K. (2000) Sensitivity in the family-professional relationship: Developmental implications for young deaf and hard of hearing children. In P. Spencer, C. Erting, & M. Marschark (Eds.). The deaf child in the family and at school.
![Page 22: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Parents’ Views of Professionals
• Professionals have information that parents do not have
• Professionals may have biases• Professionals wait until parents are “ready”• Professionals wait until parents ask• Professionals are uncomfortable sharing
“bad news”• Professionals may underestimate parents
Mertens, D. M., Sass-Lehrer, M. & Scott-Olsen, K. (2000)
![Page 23: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Communication w/ Stakeholders
• Who? – Families, medical home, involved professionals, state
systems
• What? – Information! –available/not available, recommendations,
referrals, requests
• When? – As it’s available, follow-up letters as appropriate, w/in
outlined timelines
• How? – Person to person, written, as requested
![Page 24: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Use Acronyms with Care
• Auditory Brainstem Response– ABR– BAER– BSER– BSERA– EAP– BEAP– BERA– AABR– SABR– ABAER
• Otoacoustic Emissions– OAE– EOAE– SFOAE– TEOAE– DPOAE– COAE– TOAE– DPE– ADP
![Page 25: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Acronyms (cont.)
• EHDI• UNHS• IFSP• WBN• NICU• IDEA• JCAHO• PCP• HMO• DRG• CPT
• AAA• AAP• ASHA• CDC• HRSA• JCIH• MCHB• MDNC• NCCC• NCHAM • OSERS• RIHAP
![Page 26: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Emerging Trends
• Minority populations are increasing
• By the year 2020, it is estimated that the minority populations will exceed the white population in the US
• The diversity of professionals serving those with hearing loss is limited
![Page 27: Primary Goal](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062808/5681525f550346895dc09242/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
General Population vs Audiologists
38
62
Minority White
7
93
Minority White