presentation - antenna isolation for wireless...
TRANSCRIPT
Confidential and Proprietary
ethertronicsethertronics
Ansoft, San Diego 10/12/01
Page 2Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
Company History:- Created in May 2000- Funded by Sevin Rosen and US trust
Targeted markets and applications:- Embedded antennas for Cell Phones- Laptops and all wireless applications
between 800 MHz and ISM
ethertronics
Located: San Diego Tech Center9605 Scranton Road, suite 850San Diego, CA 92121
Page 3Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
Antenna isolation
for wireless communications systems
Gregory Poilasne, S. Rowson, L. Desclos
Page 4Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
OVERVIEW
1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interactiona) Antenna placementb) Radiation pattern - Efficiency evaluationc) Bit rate Measurements
3 - Internal antenna isolationa) Experimental and numerical results
2 - Isolation Measurementsa) Interaction with the case and the componentsb) Interaction with the user
CONCLUSION
Page 5Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interaction
a) Antenna placement
Home-RF solution
Page 6Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interaction
a) Antenna placement
Proposed solution
Antenna position
Page 7Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interaction
b) Radiation pattern - Efficiency evaluation
Efficiency = power at the antenna inputradiated power
Takes into account:input mismatchloss into the antennaloss into the surroundings
Measured by comparing:free space dipole
tothe antenna inside the system
Page 8Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interaction
b) Radiation pattern - Efficiency evaluation
Antenna XRipples due to the
interactions
Isolated AntennaSmooth radiation pattern
4dB Efficiency difference
Page 9Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interaction
c) Bit rate Measurements
Practical efficiency measurement:
Antenna
LaptopCommunication
channel
Bit rate measurementversus
the distance between the two laptops
Antenna
Page 10Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interaction
c) Bit rate Measurements
Distance (feet)0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Bit r
ate
(bit/
s)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Proxim facing transmitterPhotonic RF facing transmitterProxim looking away from transmitterPhotonic RF looking away from transmitter
Parking Lot Test - Minimum Possible Multipath(Office test is Isotropic)
ET Antenna is vertical
ET antenna
ET antenna
AUT
AUT
Page 11Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interaction
c) Bit rate Measurements
Practical efficiency measurement:
Antenna
Attenuator
LaptopCommunication
channel
Bit rate measurementversus
the attenuation
Page 12Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
1 - Antenna and Surrounding Interaction
c) Bit rate Measurements
Ref : Ideal dipole away fromany absorber.
ET ant: Isolated antennaAntenna X: antenna sold with
the Home RF card.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Attenuation (dB)
Bit
Rat
e (K
B/s
)
DipolePRFC antSymphonyET ant. Ant. X
Approximately 4.5dB ofefficiency difference
Efficiencydifference
Page 13Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
The problem of Efficiency: Isolation
Interaction between the antenna and the case: Reduction of efficiency
Need for a tool to measure the interaction: Antenna IsolationMultiple applications in the same enclosure
Page 14Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
a) Interaction with the case and the components
2 - Isolation Measurements
Shields tend to shortcircuit antennas
Page 15Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
a) Interaction with the case and the components
2 - Isolation Measurements
Example of a PIFA
E field
Metallicshield
Page 16Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
2 - Isolation Measurements
d
Point A
Decay associated
Point A
p
a) Interaction with the case and the components
Antenna
Shield
Page 17Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
2 - Isolation Measurements
a) Interaction with the case and the components
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 420246810121416182022242628
30-3525-3020-2515-2010-155-100-5
antenna Shift in MHz
Distance in mmDistance in mm
Page 18Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
2 - Isolation Measurements
a) Interaction with the case and the components
y = 0.0245Ln(x) + 0.048
y = 0.0109Ln(x) + 0.0195
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Freq (GHz)
measurements
fitting
Distance in cm
Page 19Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
2 - Isolation Measurements
a) Interaction with the case and the components
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 420246810121416182022242628
19-2018-1917-1816-1715-1614-1513-1412-1311-1210-119-108-97-86-75-64-53-42-31-20-1
antenna Shift in MHz
BC
Distance in mm
Page 20Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
2 - Isolation Measurements
b) Interaction with the user
3D Radiation patternLoss into the user bodyNeed to shield the user
- Performance- Health
Frequency shift/matching Need for isolated antennas
- Performance
Page 21Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
2 - Isolation Measurements
b) Interaction with the user
Frequency: 1.575GHzBandwidth: 8MHz
Critical
case
Antenna
Page 22Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
2 - Isolation Measurements
b) Interaction with the user
Frequency shift: 2.5MHz
Blue curve: free space
Antenna
Page 23Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
2 - Isolation Measurements
b) Interaction with the user
Hand over the side of the antenna
Blue curve: free space
Frequency shift: 1MHzIncrease of the reflection
Antenna
Page 24Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
Improving Antenna Isolation
Current distribution:It has to be confined nearby the antenna.
Nearfield distribution:The nearfield has to be shaped awayfrom parasitic elementsConfined the field as much as possible
Nearfield probing: long and no so accurate
Simulation tools: Faster and faster, easy to visualize
Page 25Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
3 - Improving the antenna isolation
Experimental and numerical results
PIFA:
Currents are leakingon the sides.
Page 26Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
3 - Improving the antenna isolation
Experimental and numerical results
Isolated Antenna:
Low currents outsidethe antenna.
Page 27Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
3 - Improving the antenna isolation
Experimental and numerical results
PIFA with shield:
Coupling with theshield.
Frequency shift:9%
Page 28Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
3 - Improving the antenna isolation
Experimental and numerical results
Isolated antenna with shield:
Low coupling withthe shield.
Frequency shift:3%
Page 29Gregory Poilasne [email protected]
CONCLUSION
Isolation means:
- Low interaction between an antenna and its surroundingsInside the enclosure: components, caseOutside the enclosure: user body, table,...
- Better efficiency in real world applications
- Semi-standard productsdrop-in componentfast turn-around design and optimization