presentation 07-01-13 final
TRANSCRIPT
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 1/20
Linking
Teaching & Research at KUL
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 2/20
Outline of the session : intended Los
•
• To explore the concept of linking teaching and research and
the implications for curriculum design;
• To discuss a range of discipline based and department widecase studies to link teaching and discipline based research;
• To link the case studies to what you might already be doing as
individuals/course teams or planning/wishing to do in the
future.
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 3/20
Academics for the 21century?
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 4/20
What do we mean by ……
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 5/20
Research
Brew (2003, pp. 6-7) identified 4 different conceptions of research:• Trading view: “in the foreground are the products of research: theend points, publications, grants and social networks….Recognition andreward.”
• Domino view: “the researcher’s focus is on the solutions to problems
and the answering of questions … It looks outside the immediatecontext of the research.”
• Layer view: “the focus looks inward. It is internal because in the focusof awareness are the data containing ideas together with (linked to)hidden meanings. … Here, research is interpreted as a process of
discovering, uncovering or creating underlying meanings” • Journey view: “in the foreground are the personal existential issuesand dilemmas of the researcher… the researcher is the focal point ofawareness. Research is interpreted as a personal journey of discoverypossibly leading to transformation.
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 6/20
What do you mean by ….
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 7/20
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 8/20
Line Ups
I see the links of research and teaching enhancing
mostly the postgraduate students’ learning
Strongly Strongly
agree disagree
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 9/20
Rationale T&R linkage
‘For the students who are the professionals of thefuture, developing the ability to investigate problems,make judgments on the basis of sound evidence, take
decisions on a rational basis, and understand what theyare doing and why is vital.
Research and inquiry is not just for those who choose topursue an academic career. It is central to professional
life in the twenty-first century.’ Brew (2007, p.7)
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 10/20
Enquiry and research-based learning
• Method of teaching and learning based on self-directed enquiry or research by the
student. It provides a strongly student-centred approach to T&L, enhancing
students' learning experience. (http://goo.gl/2sRZa9)
Inquiry is a form of Self-Directed Learning and follows the four basic stages defining
self-directed learning. Students take more responsibility for:
- Determining what they need to learn
- Identifying resources and how best to learn from them
- Using resources and reporting their learning
- Assessing their progress in learning
(http://goo.gl/JU8tNP)
• Undergraduate Research and Inquiry-based Learning: Is There a Difference? Insights from
Research in New Zealand. (http://www.cur.org/assets/1/7/Spronken-Smith.pdf)
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 11/20
Different ways of linking research and
teaching
• Learning about others’ research
• Learning to do research – research methods
• Learning in research mode – enquiry based
• Pedagogic research – enquiring and reflecting on
learning (scholarship of learning and teaching)
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 12/20
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 13/20
Research-tutored
Engaging in research
discussions
Research-based
Students undertaking
research and inquiry
Research-led
Learning about current
research in the discipline
Research-oriented
Developing research
inquiry and techniques
STUDENT-FOCUSED
STUDENTS AS PARTICIPANTS
EMPHASIS ON
RESEARCH
CONTENT
EMPHASIS ON
RESEARCH
PROCESSES
AND
PROBLEMS
TEACHER-FOCUSED
STUDENTS AS AUDIENCE
Linking T&R conceptual framework(Healey & Jenkins, 2009, p.7)
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 14/20
Framework
• Research-led: where students learn about research findings, the curriculum
content is strongly shaped by faculty research interests/current research in
the discipline.
• Research-oriented: where students learn about research processes, the
curriculum emphasises as much the processes by which knowledge is
produced as learning knowledge that has been achieved, and faculty try to
engender a research ethos through their teaching.
• Research-based: where students learn as researchers, the curriculum is
largely designed around inquiry-based activities, and the division of roles
between teacher and student is minimised.
• Research tutored: where students supported by staff in small group discuss
current research ( papers) in their discipline.
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 15/20
Task 1 (Group Work)
Discuss with those around you the research evidence presented by the authors:
• Policy Separation: ‘Heads of departments and other managers of staff time
indicated that, on a managerial level, it is more convenient for teaching and
research activities to be treated as separate activities. On an intellectual
level, however, academic managers would rather perceive the two to besynergistic.’ (Coate et al ., 2001, p. 162)
• Curriculum design: ‘The academic community in higher education is
becoming increasingly fragmented, with arguably the greatest fault line
between research and teaching. (…) through the reinvention of the
undergraduate curriculum to focus on student engagement in research and
research-type activities, a truly inclusive community of academic practice
can be created with consequent benefits to academics, students and
support staff.’ (Smith & Rust, 2011, p.115)
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 16/20
Task 2 | Group A
Consider how one or more of the discipline case studies (pp. 4-26 ) could be adapted
to your context and/or how it relates to the conceptual framework
2.1 Biosciences, Physical Sciences and Medicine
2.2 Social Sciences
2.3 Business, Computing ,Law and Tourism
2.4 Geography and Environmental Studies
2.5 Archaeology and Earth Sciences
2.6 Arts, Media, Architecture and Performing Arts
2.7 English
2.7 History
2.8 Education and Philosophy
State one thing that is important about the relevance of this case study to ‘your’
practice /policy/or worth saying about this case study …
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 17/20
Task 2 | Group B
Departmental Case Studies (pp. 26-38)
Discuss one or more of the case studies –and then agree on
one statement worth making as to its value to your
department(s) or faculty
3.1 Biosciences, Chemistry, Medicine and Health Sciences
3.2 Engineering and Mathematics
3.3 Arts and Social Sciences
3.4 Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences
3.5 Developing research skills and academic practices
3.6 Re-designing Spaces
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 18/20
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 19/20
Some final reflections
• Linking T&R can be perceived in different ways and developed at
different levels (individual, departmental, institutional level)
• Linking T&R should be taking seriously by schools/department
(integrated in the curriculum) and these experiences should be
monitored and assessed;
• Bringing your teaching and research more effectively together can
help you balance what can be competing demands on your time
and attention.
• Include all and be selective.
• Link undergraduate research and inquiry to student employability
Isabel Huet [email protected]
8/13/2019 Presentation 07-01-13 Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/presentation-07-01-13-final 20/20
ReferencesBrew, A. (2003) Teaching and research: new relationships and their implications for inquiry-based
teaching and learning in higher education, Higher Education Research & Development. 22(1), 3-18.
Brew, A. (2007). Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. In A. Brew, & J. Sachs, (Eds.).
Transforming a University: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Practice (pp. 1-10). Sydney:
Sydney University Press.
Coate, K., Barnett, R., & Williams, G. (2001) Relationships between teaching and research in higher
education in England, Higher Education Quarterly. 55(2), 158 –174.
Hattie, J., & Marsh, H.W. (1996) The relationship between research and teaching: a meta-analysis,
Review of Educational Research. 66(4), 507-542.
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: HE Academy,
Available at:
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/resources/publications/DevelopingUndergra
duate_Final.pdf
Smith, P., & Rust, C .(2011). The potential of research-based learning for the creation of truly inclusive
academic communities of practice, Innovations in Education and Teaching International 48(2).
A selected bibliography (regularly updated) available at:
http://www.mickhealey.co.uk/resources
Isabel Huet i huet@kingston ac uk