powertrain efficiency: evaluating different techniques for ... · whilst all electric vehicles use...
TRANSCRIPT
#LCV2019 @LCV_Event
Powertrain Efficiency: Evaluating Different
Techniques for Improving the Energy
Efficiency of the Electric PowertrainGreg Harris
Global Strategy Lead for Electrification – HORIBA MIRA
LCV2019 Event Sponsor:
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019
Greg Harris – Global Lead for Electrification
2
The development of energy efficient
electric vehicles
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 3
HORIBA MIRA: A global-leader in engineering, research and product testing
Technology Park
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 4
4
Addressing challenges for EV adoption
▪ Global OEMs face the challenge of increasing the
range of electric and hybrid vehicles whilst reducing the
cost
▪ OEM stated range is based on regulation drive cycles
not real world drive conditions – leading to bad press
▪ Achieving that range whilst providing driver comfort is
another challenge
▪ Improvements in technology help to increase range but
come with a cost penalty and/or time to market
▪ Increasing the energy efficiency of the EV is a low cost
method to increase range and improve performance
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019
Example: Chinese Government’s approach to push for EV efficiency:
Subsidy
NEV credit
Road right
* New policy published on March 26th 2019
Recent Policy changes:- Threshold range for subsidy for BEV
increased from 150km to 250km
- Threshold energy density for subsidy for
BEV increased from 105wh/kg to 125wh/kg
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019
Examples of top selling Chinese BEV in 1st half
2018
6
Drive Range (NEDC Cycle)航続距離(NEDCサイクル)
Battery Energy Densityバッテリーエネルギー密度
Energy Efficiencyエネルギー効率
Both the range and efficiency are assessed in calculating the subsidy
NEV CreditNEVクレジット
This graph is base on the data each company officially published
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019
Effect of real world conditions on EV range
7Source : https://ev-database.uk/
Tesla
Model X
Audi e-
tron
Mercede
s EQC
400
Jaguar i-
PaceKia Niro
Hyundai
Kona
Nissan
Leaf e+
VW e-
GolfBMW i3
Renault
Zoe
ZE40
Tesla
Model 3
Hyundai
Ioniq EV
Tesla
Model S
WLTP 233 259 259 292 283 279 239 143 193 186 348 174 280 miles
WLTP Efficiency 310 320 305 290 225 225 250 220 195 215 210 160 255 Wh/mile
Range @ -10C with
Heating on185 190 190 200 195 205 185 100 120 135 245 100 215 miles
Efficiency @ -10C 390 440 420 420 325 310 320 320 315 300 300 280 335 Wh/mile
Total Battery energy
kWh75 95 85 90 67.1 67.1 62 35.8 42.2 44.1 75 30.5 75 kWh
Useable Battery energy
kWh72.5 83.6 80 84.7 64 64 60 32 37.9 41 74 28 72.5 kWh
▪ EV Range can reduce between 20-40% in low temperature conditions depending on
the vehicle and the efficiency of it’s thermal system
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 8
An Energy Efficient Solution
MIRA take a system approach to
optimising electric vehicles that can
increase the range by more than 20% in
real world driving conditions
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 9
Start with the Battery: Optimising the usable energy
▪ Optimising the useable energy of the
battery pack can deliver significant
benefits towards increasing AER.
▪ If battery pack sizing is optimised, this
reduces the cost, size and weight of
the battery pack and improves energy
efficiency at a system level.
Usable energy optimisation
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019
MIRA process for battery usable energy optimisation
▪ MIRA have developed a process for optimising the battery design and BMS algorithms for
maximum usable energy:
− Define the application specific requirements
− Analyse manufacturer data for candidate cell
− Define battery configuration
− Create initial simulation models and analyse
− Characterise cells and update models
− Define optimal BMS strategy for maximising usable
energy
10
Start with the Battery: Optimising the usable energy
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 11
Analysing the energy usage
▪ This graph shows the energy split for the
baseline electric vehicle (once the useable
energy from the battery pack has been
optimised)
▪ This clearly defines the areas of most
significant losses at a system level and
therefore areas of potential improvements
Usable energy optimisation
1.1%
23.9%
8.3%
3.0%
2.8%
1.4%
36.2%
20.8%
2.4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Thermal LV
Cabin Heating
Battery Heating
Inverter
E-Motor Loss
Other LV Loads (Inc. DCDC)
Mechanical (Useful) Power
Aerodynamic Losses
Rolling Losses
Energy Consumption by Category (% of Total)
Baseline Vehicle Energy Split with Optimised Battery DoD▪ Simulation and modelling of the vehicle
energy systems was undertaken
▪ This highlights the main energy losses
and therefore the target areas to
maximise energy efficiency
▪ Aerodynamics and rolling losses were
not considered in this approach
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 12
Thermal management techniques for
different powertrains
▪ On electric vehicles all the energy for heating or cooling must come from the HV
battery, making it critical to optimise thermal management to minimise the loss of
range
Thermal Management
▪ In traditional IC vehicles, concepts for recovering thermal energy are well proven,
such as supplying cabin heat by recovering a small amount of heat from the engine
coolant.
▪ With hybridised vehicles, this is more difficult to achieve due to the difference in
operating temps of the electrified portion of the powertrain and the hotter combustion
side
▪ For pure electric vehicles, the temperature of the wasted heat is relatively low which
means that for some operations such as cabin heating, the waste heat may not be
sufficient
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 13
Waste heat recovery and optimised battery heating
-30°C to -15°C
Status▪ Cold powertrain
▪ Battery in power-limit
mode
▪ No waste-heat
available
Solution
▪ Use on-board heating
(PTC)
▪ Powered externally (if
plugged in)
▪ Pack insulation may
be beneficial
-15°C to -5°C
Status▪ Powertrain and
battery heating up
▪ Limited waste-heat
available
Solution
▪ Use limited waste
heat from powertrain
▪ Reduce on-board
heating (PTC)
▪ Operate in closed
loop
-5°C to +25°C
Status
▪ Powertrain and
battery at temp
▪ Sufficient waste-heat
available
Solution
▪ Use waste heat from
powertrain
▪ Operate in closed
loop
+25°C to +50°C
Status
▪ Powertrain and
battery over-temp
▪ Excess waste-heat
available
Solution
▪ On-board cooling
required
▪ Chiller or low temp
radiator
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 14
Brake energy recovery optimisation
▪ Whilst all electric vehicles use regenerative braking, the system is often not optimised.
▪ A detailed analysis of the electrical loads on the vehicle can be used to increase the capacityfor regen braking – allowing for higher regen rates then the battery alone can manage
▪ Another option to maximise the brake energy recovery is by increasing the lift-off regenerative braking.
Brake energy recovery optimisation
HV Battery
Auxiliaries
DC/DC
Converters
12V
Battery
HV components
Motor 2Motor 1
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
20 30 40 50 60
Mfd
d (
m/s
^2)
Brake Pedal Travel (mm)
Matching BBW performance to Original brake performance
OEM BbW (fr1.5) BbW2
15
Brake-by-wire
▪ However, high levels of lift off regen can feel unpleasant to the driver
▪ To overcome this you can implement brake-by-wire; as the friction brakes are no longer
connected to the brake pedal you can maximise regen braking
Brake-by-wire
▪ Brake pedal feeling can then be adjusted to match
the original or ideal brake performance.
▪ For example, here we have results for matching
deceleration performance on a customer vehicle
using MIRA developed BBW
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 16
Dual battery configuration to maximise regen
▪ Another concept proposed for this project, though not implemented, was a dual battery system
▪ By adding a separate 48V battery using power cells, the regen can be increased further or used when the HV battery is full
▪ This also benefits the HV battery as it reduces the load under regen, leading to reducedcooling requirements and a longer life – but cost and efficiency need to be considered
HV Battery
Auxiliaries
DC/DC
Converters
12V
Battery
48V
Battery
Motor 2Motor 1
Dual-battery configuration
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019
▪ This graph shows the
increased range that has
been achieved through each
of the optimisation activities0.0%
7.4%
8.3%
10.1%
17.7%
21.3%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Baseline Implementation
Waste Heat Recovery (WHR)
Optimised ThermalControl Strategy
ImprovedTorque Management
Liftoff Regeneration
Brake-by-Wire
Range Improvements due to Vehicle Optimisation in Cold Conditions (WLTP, -17°C ambient)
17
Range improvements in -17℃ WLTP simulation
▪ In total, these improvements
have led to a total increase of
21.3% in vehicle AER in low
temperature conditions
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 18
Range improvements in 0°C WLTP drive cycle
0.0%
2.8%
6.5%
7.7%
15.8%
21.1%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Baseline Implementation
Waste Heat Recovery (WHR)
Optimised ThermalControl Strategy
ImprovedTorque Management
Liftoff Regeneration
Brake-by-Wire
Range Improvements due to Vehicle Optimisation in Cold Conditions (WLTP, 0°C ambient)
▪ With an optimised thermal
strategy, active heating can be
completely withdrawn, with waste
heat recovery only being used.
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019 19
Summary
▪ The incremental improvements shown through this work highlight the benefits that can be
gained from a detailed simulation and analysis of the systems involved
▪ Range improvements of more than 20% were achieved in all simulation conditions.
▪ Importantly the increased range has been achieved without implementing new components
except in the case of brake-by-wire
© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019© HORIBA MIRA Ltd. 2019
HORIBA MIRA Ltd.
Watling Street,
Nuneaton, Warwickshire,
CV10 0TU, UK
T: +44 (0)24 7635 5000
F: +44 (0)24 7635 8000
www.horiba-mira.com
Firstname SecondnameQualifications / Affiliations
Job Title
Direct T: +44 (0)24 7635 5xxx
M: +44 (0)7xxx xxxxxx
E: firstname.secondname@horiba-
mira.com
Contact Details
20
HORIBA MIRA Ltd.
Watling Street,
Nuneaton, Warwickshire,
CV10 0TU, UK
www.horiba-mira.com
Greg HarrisBEng
Global Electrification Services
Leader
Direct T: +44 (0)24 7635 8156
General Enquiries
+44 (0)24 7635 5000
www.horiba-mira.com/enquiries
#LCV2019 @LCV_Event
Development and Test of MAGSPLIT
Dedicated Hybrid Transmission (DHT) for
Vehicles Cross-Platform ApplicationGboyega Oshin
Project Manager – Magnomatics
LCV2019 Event Sponsor:
®
23Confidential
DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF MAGSPLIT
DEDICATED HYBRID TRANSMISSION (DHT) FOR
CROSS-PLATFORM APPLICATION
Gboyega Oshin, Stuart Calverley, Jeff Birchall
Magnomatics Ltd, UK
®
25Confidential
MAGSPLIT Dedicated Hybrid Transmission Unit
MAGSPLIT - Combining engine and electrical power to provide highly efficient powertrain
• Dedicated hybrid transmission for passenger cars, buses and trucks
• Low cost, high efficiency transmission
• Simple, proven and flexible
Innovate UK sponsored project – Magnomatics Limited, Romax Technology, Changan UK, CMCL
®
26Confidential
Simple Concept
• One input shaft and one output shaft, with electronic ratio control
• Magnetic interaction of the input rotor, output rotor and the stator changes speed ratio of
input/output
Input rotor
Output rotor
Electronic ratio control
®
27Confidential
Typical Powersplit Architecture
• Magsplit replaces planetary gear and a motor/generator in a typical powersplit
• There is still a need to add electrical power boost into the drivetrain using a second electrical motor
®
28Confidential
Cross-Platform Application
• Machines sized to meet requirements for performance (Vmax, 0-50 kph and 0-100 kph) and
gradeability for both HEV and EV modes
• Transmission sized for two vehicles: C/D segment passenger and Sports Utility Vehicle platforms
• Engine and transmission assessed for sport, mid-range and entry level, PHEV and HEV variants
EADO
CS75
√ √ √
√√ √
√ with ERAD
®
29Confidential
Concept Evaluation – Coaxial vs Parallel Layout
Coaxial:
• Simpler machine with fewer parts
• Larger traction motor diameter
• Packaging more challenging
Parallel axis:
• Separate gear stage allows
for smaller and faster traction
motor
• Easier to package
®
30Confidential
Concept Selection additional considerations
• Packaging
• Fuel consumption
• Durability
• Complexity
• Cost
Parallel axis with 1-speed offered the best trade-off
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
NEDC WLTP Artemis
Co
rrect
ed
fu
el
con
sum
pti
on
(litr
es/
100
km
)
coaxial 1-speed
coaxial 2-speed
parallel 1-speed
Fuel Consumption
®
31Confidential
Detail Design - Analysis
Magnet rotor structuralTransmission modal analysis
Drivetrain structural Pole Piece rotor structural
®
33Confidential
Brass Board Testing and Controller Development
Engine
Magsplit Traction
motor
Torque
transducer
• Magsplit DHT system separated into main
components for brass board testing
• Torque transducer between system components
and current shunts connected to electric machine
informs the power flow between components
• SIL, HIL and brass board testing used for
controller development
®
34Confidential
Transmission build
Stators and sleeves in caseGeartrain Dry Build
MAGSPLIT Input and
output rotor assembly
®
36Confidential
Sub-system Testing – Traction Motor
• Back-to-back testing allows full range
testing of traction motors (14,500 rpm and
225 Nm)
• Thermal mapping; heat soak test
• Oil distribution and coolant flow rate
• Machine loss map at two temperatures
TM rotor TM in case for sub-system
testing
• Very capable EV mode – high power
density and high efficiency
®
37Confidential
Testing Results
• Factory Acceptance Tests
• Loss measurements
• Thermal Performance
80oC225 Nm
®
39Confidential
Transmission Cost and Fuel Economy Walk
Full BOM costed by FEV (Europe)
High volume manufacture at European labour and material rates
“Equivalent” DCT costed using the same assumptions on quantities, labour, etc
MAGSPLIT DHT cost 20% lower than equivalent hybrid DCT
DCT Magsplit
20%