polkowsky testimony final - home | house committee on ......stakeholder approach; a. colorado’s...

13
1 Before the United States House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on the Environment History and Implementation of the Clean Air Act Visibility Protection Provisions Testimony of Bruce Polkowsky Environmental Science, Technology and Policy Consultant March 23, 2016 Chairman Bridenstine, Ranking Member Bonamici and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify about the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Regional Haze Regulations. My name is Bruce Polkowsky. I am an independent contractor working with many parties to find innovative ways to implement provisions of EPA’s visibility protection requirements and related environmental protection programs. I previously served as a policy analyst with the National Park Service’s Air Resources Division, and before that as an Environmental Engineer in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. In both positions, I served under Republican and Democratic Administrations. The nation’s large national parks and wilderness areas are treasures of immense importance to all Americans and the world. Upon visiting the Grand Canyon in 1903, President Theodore Roosevelt remarked, “Leave it as it is. You cannot improve on it. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it. What you can do is keep it for you children, and for all who come after you, as the one great sight which every American…should see.” Starting with the Organic Act in 1916 creating the National Park Service, expanded by the 1964 Wildness Act and specifically in the 1977 Amendments to the Clean Air Act, the Congress has recognized, with overwhelming bipartisan support, the need to protect the scenic views of large national parks and wilderness areas, leaving them “unimpaired” for the enjoyment of future generations. 1 Ninety-five percent of the National Park Service visitor studies conducted in the national parks protected by the visibility protection regulations over the last 20 years, covering over 10,000 groups of visitors, list scenic views as extremely important or very important, with 95 percent ranking scenic views as the first, second, or third most important attribute out of 14 total choices. 2 1 16 U.S.C. § 1, National Park Service Organic Act and Public Law 88-577(16 U.S. C. 1131-1136) Wilderness Act 2 National Park Service Visitor Values & Perceptions of Clean Air, Scenic Views & Dark Night Skies, 1988-2011, Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/ARD/NRR- 2013/632

Upload: others

Post on 03-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

1

BeforetheUnitedStatesHouseCommitteeonScience,Space,andTechnologySubcommitteeontheEnvironment

HistoryandImplementationoftheCleanAirActVisibilityProtectionProvisions

TestimonyofBrucePolkowskyEnvironmentalScience,TechnologyandPolicyConsultant

March23,2016

ChairmanBridenstine,RankingMemberBonamiciandMembersoftheSubcommittee,thankyoufortheopportunitytotestifyabouttheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency’sRegionalHazeRegulations.MynameisBrucePolkowsky.IamanindependentcontractorworkingwithmanypartiestofindinnovativewaystoimplementprovisionsofEPA’svisibilityprotectionrequirementsandrelatedenvironmentalprotectionprograms.IpreviouslyservedasapolicyanalystwiththeNationalParkService’sAirResourcesDivision,andbeforethatasanEnvironmentalEngineerintheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency’sOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandards.Inbothpositions,IservedunderRepublicanandDemocraticAdministrations.Thenation’slargenationalparksandwildernessareasaretreasuresofimmenseimportancetoallAmericansandtheworld.UponvisitingtheGrandCanyonin1903,PresidentTheodoreRooseveltremarked,“Leaveitasitis.Youcannotimproveonit.Theageshavebeenatworkonitandmancanonlymarit.Whatyoucandoiskeepitforyouchildren,andforallwhocomeafteryou,astheonegreatsightwhicheveryAmerican…shouldsee.”StartingwiththeOrganicActin1916creatingtheNationalParkService,expandedbythe1964WildnessActandspecificallyinthe1977AmendmentstotheCleanAirAct,theCongresshasrecognized,withoverwhelmingbipartisansupport,theneedtoprotectthescenicviewsoflargenationalparksandwildernessareas,leavingthem“unimpaired”fortheenjoymentoffuturegenerations.1Ninety-fivepercentoftheNationalParkServicevisitorstudiesconductedinthenationalparksprotectedbythevisibilityprotectionregulationsoverthelast20years,coveringover10,000groupsofvisitors,listscenicviewsasextremelyimportantorveryimportant,with95percentrankingscenicviewsasthefirst,second,orthirdmostimportantattributeoutof14totalchoices.2

116U.S.C.§1,NationalParkServiceOrganicActandPublicLaw88-577(16U.S.C.1131-1136)WildernessAct2NationalParkServiceVisitorValues&PerceptionsofCleanAir,ScenicViews&DarkNightSkies,1988-2011,NaturalResourceReportNPS/NRSS/ARD/NRR-2013/632

Page 2: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

2

Thenear40-yearimplementationoftheCleanAirAct’svisibilityprotectionprovisionshasbeenbasedonacarefulexaminationofscience,incrementalpromulgationofregulatoryrequirements,andextraordinaryinteragencycooperationthatincludesotherfederalagencies,tribesandStates.Startingwithamonitoringprogramin1985,theStateshavebeenpartofthemanagementanddevelopmentofscienceandpolicydecisions.TheGrandCanyonVisibilityTransportCommission(1991-1996)provideddirectinputtotheRegionalHazeRegulations.TheCommissionwasledbytheGovernorsofeightStatesandtheleadersoffourIndianTribes,withfiveFederalAgencieshavingnon-votingadvisoryroles.3From2000to2009,EPAprovidedfundingforfiveRegionalPlanningOrganizations(RPOs)thatprovidedforumsforallStatesandTribestobuildscientificinformationonthecausesofvisibilityimpairmentintheirregionandtodevelopcooperativestrategiestoincorporateinStateImplementationPlans.TheNationalParkService,U.S.FishandWildlifeService,ForestServiceandBureauofLandManagement,allsupportedtheRPO’swithtechnicalassistance.In1993,theNationalAcademyofSciences(NAS)reviewedthestateofthescienceforvisibilityprotectionanddeterminedthat“[p]rogresstowardthenationalgoalofremedyingandpreventingman-madevisibilityimpairmentinClassIareas(CleanAirAct,Section169(a))willrequireregionalprogramsthatoperateoverlargegeographicareasandlimitemissionsofpollutantsthatcancauseregionalhaze.”TheNASalsoconcludedthat“[r]educingemissionsforvisibilityimprovementcouldhelpalleviateotherair-qualityproblems,justasothertypesofair-qualityimprovementscouldhelpvisibility”4.Thedesignandimplementationofcontrolstrategiesforvisibilityprotectionshouldalsoaccountforcollateralimprovementsinhumanhealthandecosystemconditions.Protectionofvisibilityatourmosttreasuredparksandwildernessareasdriveseconomicprogressinthoseregionsandnationally.TheNationalParkServiceestimatesthenationalparksystemreceivedover292millionrecreationalvisitsandthosevisitorsspent$15.7billioninlocalgatewaycommunities.Thecontributionofthisspendingtothenationaleconomywas277thousandjobs,$10.3billioninlaborincome,$17.1billioninaddedvalue,and$29.7billioninoutput.5Asnotedabovethevastmajorityofthesevisitorsgeneratingthiseconomicbenefitvaluetheprotectionofscenicviews.ACleanAirTaskForcereportestimatesthatimprovingvisibilityatnationalparkswouldincreasespendingsignificantly.63TheGrandCanyonVisibilityTransportCommission,RecommendationsforImprovingWesternVistas,June10,19964ProtectingVisibilityinNationalParksanWildernessAreas,NationalResearchCouncil,NationalAcademyPress,Washington,D.C.199352014NationalparkVisitorSpendingEffects,NPS,NaturalResourceReportNPS/NRSS/EQD/NRR-2015/9476OutofSight:TheScienceandEconomicsofVisibilityImpairment,AbtAssociates,Inc.,2000

Page 3: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

3

Thevisibilityprotectionprogramisbuiltonfirmscienceandhasreflectedadatadrivenapproachtoprotectingournation’sgrandvistasanchoredinapartnershipwithfederalagencies,statesandtribes.Nearly40yearsafterCongressestablishedthenationalgoalofpreventingandremedyingairpollutiontoprotectscenicvistasinournationalparks,EPAismovingaheadwiththelongoverduemeasurestoaddresstheregionalhazeimpairment.I. 1977CleanAirActAmendmentsestablishaNationalGoalandmandateEPARegulationsinSection169AThe1977CleanAirActAmendmentsdeclaredasanationalgoalthepreventionofanyfuture,andtheremedyingofanyexisting,impairmentofvisibilityinmandatoryclassIFederalareaswhichimpairmentresultsfrommanmadeairpollution.7Congressspecificallyrecognizedthatthe“visibilityproblemiscaused(?)primarilybyemissionintotheatmosphereSO2,oxidesofnitrogen,andparticulatematter,especiallyfineparticulatematterfrominadequate[ly]controlledsources.”8The1977amendmentsrecognizedthatthenationalambientairqualitystandardswouldnotpreventairqualityinverycleanareas,suchasthedesertsouthwest,fromseriousdegradationwhichwouldthreatenthecharacteroftheregionaswellasthescenicqualitiesthatwerebehindformationofmanyofthenation’snationalparksandwildernessareas.Inits1979ReporttoCongressonthenatureandcausesofvisibilityimpairment,EPAstatedthatduetothephysicsoflighttransmissionthroughtheatmosphere,averysmallamountoffineparticulatesaddedtoacleanatmospherewilldegradethevistamorethanthesameamountaddedtoanalreadyimpairedatmosphere.Theadditionof1microgrampercubicmeteroffineparticles,spreadthroughouttheviewingpath,toacleanatmospherecouldreducevisualrangebyabout30miles,fromapproximately200to170miles.Addingthesameamountoffineparticlestoconditionsof20-milevisibilitywoulddecreasevisualrangelessthan1mile.9Sowhilethepollutantsofconcernarethesameforprotectionofvisibilityasthosefortheprotectionofhumanhealth,itisnecessarytohavearegulatorystructurethatspecificallyaddressesvisibilityprotectiontoassurethatappropriatestrategiesaddressthefullspectrumofatmosphericconditionsandadvancetheobjectiveofrestoringnaturalairqualitytoprotectedpubliclands.In1980,theEPApromulgatedregulationstoaddressmanmadeimpairmentassociatedwithspecificsourceslocatednearclassIFederalareas,butdelayedactiononimpairmentassociatedwithemissionsfrommultitudesofsourcesoverbroadgeographicareasuntilthescienceofvisibilitymonitoringandregional-scaleairqualitymodelingadvanced.10742U.S.C.§7491(a)(1).8H.R.Rep.No.95-294at204(1977).9“ProtectingVisibility,AnEPAReporttoCongress”19791045FR80086.

Page 4: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

4

The1980regulationsestablishedrequirementsforthe35StatesandoneterritorycontainingmandatoryclassIFederalareastoaddressvisibilityprotection.ThevisibilityprogramfollowsthelongestablishedstructureofhavingStatesdevelopplanswithEPAretainingoversight.AuniqueaspectofthevisibilityprotectionplansisthatStatesconsultwiththeclassIFederallandmanagementagenciesduringthedevelopmentofimplementationplansaffordinganexchangeoftechnicalexpertise.II. 1990CleanAirActAmendmentsfocusattentiononregionalhazeByaddingSection169BtotheCleanAirActin1990,CongressrequiredEPAtoconductresearchonregionalhazeimpactsincooperationwiththeNationalParkServiceandotherFederalagencies.Section169BrequiredtheestablishmentofaVisibilityTransportCommissionfocusedontheregionaffectingtheGrandCanyonNationalPark.TheCommissionissueditsfinalreportin1996.11Section169BrequiredEPAtoissueregulationstoaddressregionalhazeatmandatoryclassIFederalareaswithin18monthsofreceivingtheCommission’sreport.EPAissuedfinalRegionalHazeRegulationsonJuly1,1999.12TheimplementationoftheRegionalHazeRegulationswascoordinatedwithimplementationofthenewfineparticulatenationalambientairqualitystandardsasrequiredbytheTransportationEquityActforthe21stCentury,PublicLaw105-178.EPAadjustedtheSIPdeadlinesothatStatesparticipatinginregionalplanningorganizationscouldcoordinatetechnicalandpolicyassessmentswitheffortstoimplementthefineparticlenationalambientairqualitystandard.13WithparticipationinregionalplanningactivitiesStateshadtosubmitregionalhazeplanstoEPAbyDecember17,2007.III. ImplementationoftheRegionalHazeRules From2001to2008,mostStatesandmanyTribesparticipatedinfiveregionalplanningorganizations(RPOs),supportedbyEPAfundingfortechnicalanalysisandpolicyconsultation.TheEPAandtheclassIareaFederallandmanagementagenciesparticipatedintheRPOsprovidingtechnicalexpertiseandworkinginpartnershipwithStatesandTribesonthedevelopmentoftheregionalhazeplans,consistentwithstatutoryrequirementscallingforplandevelopmentinconsultationwiththeFederalLandManagers.IV. EPA’sPartnershipwithStates,TribesandFederalLandManagers

11GrandCanyonVisibilityTransportCommission,RecommendationsforImprovingWesternvistas,ReporttoU.S.EPA,June10,1996.1264FR357141364FR35724

Page 5: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

5

Beginningwiththe1980rules,throughamulti-agencycollaborationinthecollectionofvisibilitymonitoringdatainmandatoryFederalClassIareas,andincludingdevelopmentoftheRegionalHazeRules,EPAhashadalongpartnershipwiththeStates,TribesandFederalLandManagersindesigningthevisibilityprotectionprogram.Yet,EPAmustprovidesafeguardswhennecessarytoprotecthumanhealthandtheenvironmentincludingthegrandvistasofournationalparks.EPAhasshownflexibilityinapprovingStateregionalhazeplanswhenthoseplansmeettherequirementsoftheregionalhazeprogram.Asexemplifiedinthefollowingcases,severalplansareillustrativeofabroad,forward-lookingstakeholderapproach;

A. Colorado’sCleanAirCleanJobsAct.In2010Coloradoundertookanapproachthatexaminedcurrentandreasonablyforeseeableairqualityrequirements,suchasnewambientairqualitystandardsforozone,safeguardstoaddresscarbonpollution,effortstoaddresshazardousairpollution,suchasmercuryandregionalhaze.ConsiderationwasgiventoemergingscientificconcernswithnitrogendepositionathighaltitudelakesinRockyMountainNationalPark.TheColoradoGeneralAssemblyenactedacoordinatedmulti-pollutant,energyandairqualitystrategytoaddressemissionsfromtheelectricutilitysectoroveralargeareaoftheState.Theresultingairqualitymanagementplan,adoptedbytheColoradoAirQualityControlCommission,addressedthebestavailableretrofittechnology(BART)requirementformostsourcesinthestate.Thelocalpowercompanydevelopedcost-effective,integratedsolutionthatincludedtheinstallationofcontroltechnologies,atransitiontoinherentlycleanenergyresources,andrepoweringtonaturalgas.ThecostsfortheprogramunderwentreviewbythePublicUtilitiesCommission.TheplanwassubmittedtoEPAin2011withbi-partisansupportoftheStatelegislature,Governor,andthefullColoradoCongressionaldelegation.14TheEPAproposedapprovaloftheColoradoregionalhazeplaninMarch,2012,andcompletedapprovalinDecember,2012.15

B. BARTfornitrogenoxideemissionsfromNavajoGeneratingStation.InFebruary2013,EPAproposedaBARTemissionlimitationtoreduceemissionsofnitrogenoxides(NOx)fromNavajoGeneratingStation(NGS),locatedontheNavajoNation,buildingfromanactionyearsearliertolimittheplant’ssulfurdioxidecontributingtopollutionoftheGrandCanyon.TheEPAdeterminedthatNOxemissionsfromNGSsignificantlydegradedvisibilityat11classIareas.EPAsimultaneouslyproposeda“BARTAlternative”aswellasaframeworktoevaluating14LettertoAdministratorJackson,December16,2011,fromSenatorsUdall,Bennett,RepresentativesDegette,Lamborn,Perlmutter,Coffman,Polis,Gardner,Tipton.1577FR76871

Page 6: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

6

otherBARTalternativesrelatedtoanemissionscap.EPA’sproposedalternativetoBARTencouragedthesubmittalofothersolutionstoaddresstheplant’svisibility-impairingemissionsconsistentwithEPA’semissionsframeworkunderitsCleanAirActresponsibilities.Afterconsiderationoffurtherpubliccommentandinput,EPAadoptedanapproachjointlyrecommendedbydiverseinterestsincludingtheSaltRiverProject,theU.S.DepartmentoftheInterior(DOI),theGilaRiverIndianCommunities,theNavajoNation,theCentralArizonaWaterConservationDistrict,EnvironmentalDefenseFund,andWesternResourceAdvocates.Therecommendationsofthisjointtechnicalworkinggroupincludedacombinationofsolutionstoreducemultiplepollutantsattheplant,supportthedevelopmentofcleanenergyfortheaffectedIndianTribes,reducewaterconsumption,andaddresslocalimpactsonfamiliesandcommunitiesinthevicinityoftheplantanditscoalmine.

C. BARTfornitrogenoxideemissionsfromFourCornersPowerPlant.OnOctober19,2010EPAproposedaBARTdeterminationfortheFourCornersPowerPlant(FCPP),locatedontheNavajoNation,thatrequiredan80percentreductioninemissionsofnitrogenoxides.AtthetimeofproposaltheFCPPwasthelargestsinglesourceofnitrogenoxidesemissionsinthecountry.ThenitrogenoxideemissionfromFCPPdegradedvisibilityat16nationalparksandwildnessareas.AftertheEPAproposal,ArizonaPublicService(APS),theoperatoroftheFCPP,proposedanalternativeprovidinggreateremissionsreductionsthanEPA’sproposalbutoveralongertimeperiod.Thisapproachhadtheaddedbenefitofreducingsulfurdioxide,moreparticulatematter,mercuryandCO2aswellasreducingwaterconsumptionattheplant.OnAugust24,2012EPApromulgatedtheAPSalternative.16Asdemonstratedinpartbytheaboveexamples,States,TribesandEPAareeffectivelycarryingoutvitalresponsibilitiestoprotectscenicvistasinnationalparks–liftingtheveilofhazepollutingournation’sgrandvistas--whileworkinginpartnershipwithallstakeholders.V.BuildingontheFoundationofScienceandIntergovernmentalPartnershipstoProtecttheGrandVisasinAmerica’sNationalParksandWildernessAreasAsweneartheendofthefirstimplementationperiodoftheregionalhazerules,therearelessonsforstates,tribesandEPAasgovernmentpolicymakersworktogetheronthenextroundofplanrevisionsthatwillfocusonongoing“reasonableprogress”towardthenationalvisibilitygoal.OneofthemostinterestingdevelopmentsovertheyearssincethepromulgationoftheregionalhazeruleisthatinalmosteverymandatoryFederalClassIareatherehasbeenastatisticallysignificanttrendofimprovementinvisibilityontheclearest1677FR51620

Page 7: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

7

20percentdays.AsshownthefollowinggraphsthisistrueatmandatorylocationsasvariedasGreatSmokyMountainsNationalPark,BigBendNationalParkandGrandCanyonNationalPark.

Page 8: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

8

Lookingattheconstituentsofthefineparticulatematterattheselocations,thesetrendsarelikelyduetonationaldecreasesinammoniumsulfateconcentrations.Ammoniumsulfateparticlesarepredominantlyformedfromemissionsofindustrialandmobilesourcesofsulfurdioxide.Theseemissionshavedeclineddramaticallyoverthelast20years.Sincesmallchangesinfineparticleconcentrationswillimprovecleareratmosphericconditionsmorethanhazierdays,thisresultindicatesthattheregionalpollutionreductionswillshifttheentiredistributionofvisibilitybyincreasingthenumberofclearerdaysperyear.Makingprogresstowardthenaturalconditionsonthehaziestdaysismoreofachallenge,particularlyfortheparksandwildernessareasoftheintermountainwestasthegraphsforthehaziestdaysinthesamethreelocationsindicate:

Page 9: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

9

ExaminationofthefineparticlecomponentsmeasuredattheselocationsonthemostimpaireddaysalsoshowdecreasesinammoniumsulfateatGreatSmokyMountainsNPandGrandCanyonNP.TheregionalprogramsemissionsprogramsforNAAQSandacidrainplusnationalreductionsinthesulfurcontentoffuelsarethelikelythereasonforsulfatereductionsatGreatSmokyMountains.TheimprovementinsulfateconcentrationsatGrandCanyonNPlikelyresultedfromcontrolsatNavajoGeneratingStationandthenationalfuelprogram.ThelackofasignificanttrendatBigBendNPreflectslittlechangeinammoniumsulfatelevelsinthisregion.Thevisibilityprotectionprogramtodatehasbeenacost-effective,cooperativeeffortthathasreduceddegradationoftheclearestdaysandhasbothtrackedsignificantimprovementdrivenbyotherairqualityprogramsandcontributedtosignificantimprovementinselectareas.Theimplementationoftheregionalhazestrategiesisjustbeginningandmustprovidecontinuedprotectionandimprovement.Itisimportanttonotethatwhileoverallthetrendispositive,thereisnotasingleClassIareanationalparkorwildernessinthecountrythathasachievedthenaturalairqualityconditionsgoaloftheCleanAirAct.Throughpolicyanchoredinscience,cleanairsolutions,andintergovernmentalpartnerships,wehavemadeimportantprogressinprotectingandenhancingpremierscenicvistas.Weneedtocontinuetobuildfromthisfoundationtofulfillthenationalgoalofbothpreventingandremedyingairpollutionimpairingprotectednationalparksandwildernesses.Thefollowingimagesillustratetheprogressofaddressingvisibilityimpairmentofthe20percentmostimpaireddaysatthethreeClassIareas.17Theleftsideofthe

17Winhazeimagesforthemean20%haziestDays1989-2012,JennyHand,AirResourcesSpecialists,March13,2014http://www.air-resource.com/resources/downloads.html,Note:figureforGrandCanyonisHopiPointmonitoringstation,theolderstationnolongerusedfortrends.Datafor2012isverysimilartoHanceCampdata,soimageisreflectiveoftheairqualitychange.

Page 10: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

10

imageshowstheaveragevisibilityconditionsofmostimpaireddaysin1990basedontheaveragefineparticulateconcentrationsmeasuredonthosedays.Therightsideoftheimageshowstheaveragevisibilityconditionsforthe20percentmostimpaired20daysin2012.18

Achangefrom34deciviewsto21deciviews.

18ReviewofFederalLandManagerEnvironmentalDatabasefoundathttp://views.cira.colostate.edu/fed/SiteBrowser/Default.aspx

Page 11: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

11

Bothyearsaveraged16deciviews.

Achangefrom13deciviewsto10deciviews.

Page 12: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

12

GoingforwardEPAhastheopportunitycontinueitscooperativeapproachtoprotectingvisibility.EPAcanworkwithStatesandTribesinusingthenextgenerationofairqualitymodelinginconjunctionwiththenowrichnationaldatabaseonthecompositionoffineparticulatemattertoexploreeffectivestrategiesforprotectionandimprovementofvisibility.VI. ConclusionOurnationhasatremendousbipartisantraditionofprotectingouriconicnaturalplacesasalegacyforcurrentandfuturegenerations.Together,wehavemadeimportantprogress.Butourworkisnotdone.Ournationmustcontinuetoworktogethertoprotectournationalparksandwildernessareas–andthegrandvistasthatareintegraltotheirpreservationandenjoyment.Manyofeconomicvaluationstudiesfrom1980through2000showlargeeconomicbenefitsattributedtoincreasedrecreationaluse,topreservationofrecreationaluseforfuturegenerations,tovalueofurbanvisibilityimprovedasaresultofmultipleairqualityprograms.Whilesummarizingtheresultsofstudiesacrossmanyregionsofthecountryisdifficult,areviewofthevariousvaluationstudiesfoundthatprotectionofrecreationalvisibilitybenefitshadavaluethatrangedfrom$358milliontoapproximately$6billion.19Itisalsoimportanttorecognizethatanypollutioncontrolrequiredforprotectionofvisibilitywillhavecollateralbenefitsforpublichealthbyreducinghumanexposuretofineparticulatematter.Controllingemissionsofnitrogenoxidesforvisibilityinareasofthewestwhereozoneformationislimitedbyavailabilityofnitrogenoxidantswouldalsoresultinloweredhumanexposuretoozoneanditsassociatedhealtheffects.Sincebothozoneandfineparticulatematterarenon-thresholdpollutantsforhumanexposure,therewillbehealth-relatedbenefiteveninareasattainingthenationalambientairqualitystandards.EPA’sregionalhazeprogramprovidesavitalandenduringframework,anchoredinscienceandreflectingyearsofintergovernmentalpartnership,forStates,TribesandstakeholderstoworktowardthecommongoalofimprovingandprotectingthescenictreasuresofAmerica’smostpreciouslands.

19OutofSight:TheScienceandEconomicsofVisibilityImpairment,AbtAssociates,Inc.2000

Page 13: Polkowsky Testimony Final - Home | House Committee on ......stakeholder approach; A. Colorado’s Clean Air Clean Jobs Act. In 2010 Colorado undertook an approach that examined current

13

BrucePolkowsky1610LittleRavenStreet,Unit308Denver,CO80202Experience

Science,Technology,andPolicyConsultant(Denver,CO),(2010–present).NationalParkService(Lakewood,CO),SeniorPolicyAnalyst(1998-2010).EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(ResearchTrianglePark,NC,SanFrancisco,CA),EnvironmentalEngineer(1977–1998).

Education

MS EnvironmentalEngineering,DukeUniversityBSE CivilEngineeringandPublicPolicy,DukeUniversity

RecentTestimonyandPublicCommentBefore:

ArizonaCorporationCommission,ColoradoAirQualityControlCommission,CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard

SelectedPublications(withVickiePatton)“TheEPA’sRegionalHazeProposal:protectingvisibilityinnationalparksandwildernessareas,”TulaneEnvironmentalLawJournal,vol.II,1998(withJohnBachmannetal.)ReviewofNationalAmbientStandardsforParticulateMatter:PolicyAssessmentofScientificandTechnicalInformation.OAQPSStaffPaper,U.S.EPA,1996EPA/452/R-96/013.(NTIS,Springfield,VAPB97-115406REB)(withMarcPitchford)“Percentchangeinextinctioncoefficient:aproposedapproachforfederalvisibilityprotectionstrategy,”in“VisibilityandFineParticles”ConferenceTransactions,TR-17,A&WMA1990ImplementationPlansforVisibilityProtection-PartII,JournaloftheAirPollutionControlAssociation,conferenceproceedings,paper85-9.7,1985(withDavidStonefieldandWilliamHamilton)ImplementingSection126:ControllingInterstatePollution,JournaloftheAirPollutionControlAssociation,conferenceproceedings,paper82.34.1,1982