1

Philosophical Foundations of Organization & Management Theories

2

1. Paul R. Carlile and Clayton M. Christensen (2004), The Cycles of Theory

Building in Management Research , Boston : Boston University.

2. Cheryl Bagley Thompson and B. Lee Walker (1998), Basics of Research

(Part 12):Qualitative Research, Air Medical Journal ,17, 2 .

3. Philip Clissett (2008), Evaluating qualitative research,Journal of

Orthopaedic Nursing, 12, 99–105.

4. Robert B. Handfield & Steven A. Melnyk(1998) , The scientific theory-

building process, Journal of Operations Management, 16, 1998.321–339.

5. Hugh Willmott (1995) , What has been happening in organization theory and

does it matter? , Personnel Review, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 33-53.

6. Shaker A. Zahra and Lance R. Newey (2009) , Maximizing the Impact of

Organization Science:Theory-Building at the Intersection of Disciplines

and/or FieldsJournal of Management Studies 46:6 .

7. Julia Storberg-Walker(2007),Understanding the Conceptual Development

Phase of Applied Theory-Building Research: A Grounded Approach ,

HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, vol. 18, no. 1.

8. John R. Cutcliffe (2000) , Methodological issues in grounded theory, Journal

of Advanced Nursing , 31(6).

9. Rifat O. Shannak and Fairouz M. Aldhmour(2009)Grounded Theory as a

Methodology for Theory Generation in Information Systems Research,

European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, Issue

15.

10. Helen Heath, Sarah Cowley(2004) , Review Developing a grounded theory

approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss, International Journal of

Nursing Studies 41 , 141–150.

11. Weiherich Heinz (1993) , Management: science ,theory and

practice,MacGraw-Hill.

12. 13.Davis Ralph C. (1958)A philosophy of management, The Journal of

Insurance , Vol. 25 ,No. 3, pp. 1-7.

13. Dixon John and Dogan Rhys (2003) , A philosophical analysis of

management: improving praxis, Journal of Management Development ,Vol.

22 ,No. 6, pp. 458-482.

14. Adrianna Kezar(2006) , TO USE OR NOT TO USE THEORY: IS

THATTHE QUESTION? in J.C. Smart , Higher Education: Handbook of

Theory and Research, Vol. XXI, 283–344.

3

15. Joyce Thompson Heames and Jacob W. Breland(2010) , Management

pioneer contributors: 30-year review , Journal of Management History ,Vol. 16 ,

No. 4, pp. 427-436.

16.. Michael Schwartz(2001), ―Management as the Spirit of the Modern Age‖ ,

Journal of Business Ethics , 29: 189–198.

17. Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi and GeorgeW. Hay(2004) , Actionable Knowledge

and Scholar-Practitioners: A Process Model of Theory-Practice Linkages ,

Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 17, No. 3.

18. Peron Michel and Peron Monique (2003) , Postmodernism and the socio-

economic approach to organizations, Journal of Organizational Change

Management ,Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 49-55.

19. Nanette Monin(2004) ,Management Theory: A critical and reflexive reading ,

New York :Routledge.

20. Ghoshal Sumantra (2005), Bad Management Theories Are

Destroying Good Management Practices, Academy of Management Learning &

Education, Vol. 4, No. 1, 75–91.

4

21. Maurice Yolles and Kaijun Guo(2003) ,Paradigmatic Metamorphosis and

Organizational Development, Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst.

Res.20,177-199.

22. RICHARD TERSINE, MICHAEL HARVEY and MICHAEL

BUCKLEY(1997) , Shifting Organizational Paradigms: Transitional

Management, European Management Journal Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 45-57.

23. Tim Goles and Rudy Hirschheim(2000), The paradigm is dead, the paradigm

is dead. . .long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan, Omega, 28

,249±268.

24. Alan Sheldon(1980) , Organizational Paradigms: A Theory of Organizational

Change , Organizational Dynamics, Winter 1980.

25. Wolfgang Pindur and Sandra E. Rogers and Pan Suk Kim (1995) , The

history of management: a global perspective, Journal of Management History

Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 59-77.

26. Chester S. Spell(2000) , Where do management fashions come from, and how

long do they stay? , Journal of Management History, Vol. 5 No. 6, pp. 334-348.

27. NORMAN JACKSON and PIPPA CARTERt (1995) , THE "FACT" OF

MANAGEMENT, Scand. J. Mgrat, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 197-208.

28. Robert P. Gephart Jr(1996) , Postmodernism and the future

history of management: Comments on history as science , Journal of

Management History , Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 90-96.

29. Mary E. Boyce (1996), Organizational story and storytelling: a critical

review, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 5-26.

30. Rocky J. Dwyer (2005), Formal organizations in contemporary society: The

relevance of historical perspectives, Management Decision, Vol. 43 No. 9,

pp. 1232-1248.

31. David Lamond (2005) , On the value of management history Absorbing the

past to understand the present and inform the future, Management Decision

Vol. 43 No. 10, pp. 1273-1281.

32. Jane Whitney Gibson and Richard M. Hodgetts and Jorge M.Herrera(1999),

Management history gurus of the 1990s Their lives, their contributions, Journal

of Management History, Vol. 5 No. 6, pp. 380-397.

33. Nell Tabor Hartley (2006) , Management history: an umbrella model ,

Journal of Management History, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 278-292.

34. Sam Natale and Frederick Ricci (2006) ,Critical thinking in Organizations

Team Performance Management , Vol. 12 , No. 7/8.

5

35. Sigmund Wagner-Tsukamoto(2008) , Scientific Management revisited: Did

Taylorism fail because of a too positive image of human nature? , Journal of

Management History ,Vol. 14 , No. 4, pp. 348-372

36. Hindy Lauer Schachter(2010) , The role played by Frederick Taylor in the

rise of the academic management fields , Journal of Management History ,Vol.

16 , No. 4, pp. 437-448.

37. Pierre Cossette (2002) , Analysing the thinking of F.WW. Taylor using

cognitive mapping , Management Decision , Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 168-182.

38. Ed Weymes(2004) , A challenge to traditional management theory , foresight

Volume 6, Number 6, pp. 338-348.

39. Reshef Yonatan (2001) , Taylor's Scientific Management.

40. Parayitam and White and Hough (2002) , Juxtaposition of Chester Barnard

and Frederick W. Taylor :Forerunners of Management, Management Decision,

Vol. 40 No. 10, pp. 1oo3-1012.

41. Danielle S. Beu and Nancy H. Leonard (2004) , Evangelism of great works in

Management How the gospel is spread , Management Decision ,Vol. 42 No. 10,

pp. 1226-1239.

42. Charles D. Wrege (1995) , F.W. Taylor’s lecture on management, 4 June

1907 : An introduction, Journal of Management History , Vol. 1 , No. 1, pp. 4-7.

43. Paul P. Van Riper (1995) , Luther Gulick on Frederick Taylor and scientific

management, Journal of Management History , Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 6-7.

44. Christopher P. Neck and Arthur G. Bedeian (1995) , Frederick W. Taylor, J.

Maunsell White III, and the Matthew Effect The rest of the story, Journal of

Management History, Vol. 2 No. 2 , pp. 20-25.

45. Ellen S. O’Connor (1996) , Lines of authority: readings of foundational texts

on the profession of management , Journal of Management History , Vol. 2 , No.

3, pp. 26-49.

46. Daniel Martin (1995) , From mechanical engineering to re-engineering:

would Taylor be pleased with modern management? , Journal of Management

History, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 38-51.

47. Chris Nyland(1995) , Taylorism and hours of work, Journal of Management

History, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 8-25.

48 . David John Farmer(1997) , Contemporary conceptual space: reading Adam

Smith ,Journal of Management History,

Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 246-255.

6

49 .Takayuki Miura , Did Fordism take up Taylorism ? : acritique of Regulation

theory : wage shift from productivity – based to profitability – based .

50. Stephanie C. Payne and Satoris S. Youngcourt and Kristen M. Watrous

(1995) , Portrayals of F.W. Taylor across textbooks, Journal of Management

History, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 385-407.

51. Fariss-Terry Mousa and David J. Lemak(2009)The Gilbreths’ quality system

stands the test of time , Journal of Management History ,Vol. 15 , No. 2, pp. 198-

215.

3D

52. Mildred Golden Pryor and Sonia Taneja(2010) , Henri Fayol, practitioner

and theoretician – revered and reviled, Journal of Management History,Vol. 16,

No. 4, pp. 489-503.

53. Daniel Wren and Arthur Bedeian and John Breeze (2002) , The foundations

of Henri Fayols administrative theory , Management Decision ,Vol. 40 No. 9,

pp. 906-918.

54. Daniel A. Wren (1995) , Henri Fayol: learning from Experience , Journal of

Management History, Vol. 1 No. 3 , pp. 5-12.

55. Donald Reid (1995) , Fayol: from experience to theory, Journal of

Management History, Vol. 1, No. 3 , pp. 21-36.

56. Donald Reid(1995) , Reading Fayol with 3D glassesJournal of Management

History, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 63-71.

57. Michael J. Fells(2000) , Fayol stands the test of time Journal of management

History ,Vol. 6No.8, pp. 345-360.

58. David Lamond (2004) , A matter of style : reconciling Henri and Henry ,

Management Decision ,Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 330-356.

59. Lee D. Parker and Philip Ritson(2005) , Fads, stereotypes and management

gurus: Fayol and Follett today, Management Decision,Vol. 43 No. 10, 2005,

pp. 1335-1357.

60. Jae Wook Yoo and David J. Lemak and Youngjun Choi (2006) , Principles

of management and competitive strategies: using Fayol to implement Porter ,

Journal of Management History, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 352-368.

61. Lee D. Parker and Philip A. Ritson (2005) , Revisiting Fayol: Anticipating

Contemporary Management, British Journal of Management, Vol. 16, 175–194 .

7

62. Demetrios Argyriades(2010) , From Bureaucracy to Debureaucratization? ,

Public Organiz Rev , 10:275–297.

63.Stephen Karberg (1980) , Max Webers types of rationality : cornerstones for

the analysis of rationalization processes in history , The American Journal of

Sociology , VOL.85 N.5 pp.1145-1179.

64. George Ritzer(2007) , The Weberian Theory of Rationalization and the

McDonaldization of Contemporary Society.

65. George Psathas , The Ideal Type in Weber and Schutz.

66. Laurie Newman DiPadova (2005) , Towards a Weberian management theory:

lessons from Lowell Bennion’s neglected masterwork, Journal of Management

History, Vol. 2 No. 1, 1996, pp. 59-74.

67. Harro M. Ho¨pfl (2006) , Post-bureaucracy and Weber’s ―modern‖

bureaucrat , Journal of Organizational Change Management , Vol. 19, No. 1,

pp. 8-2.

68. SVEN ELIAESON (2000) , MAX WEBER’S METHODOLOGY: AN

IDEAL-TYPE , Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 36(3),

241–263 .

69. Stephen Harrison and Ruth McDonald (2003) , Science, consumerism and

Bureaucracy New legitimations of medical professionalism, The International

Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 110-121.

70. Neal Ryan (1999) , Rationality and implementation analysis , Journal of

Management History, Vol. 5 , No. 1, pp. 36-52.

71. Richard S. Bolan(1999) , Rationality revisited An alternative perspective on

reason in management and planning, Journal of Management History,

Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 68-86.

72 . Milan Zafirovski (2008) , Classical and neoclassical conceptions of

rationality—Findings of an exploratory survey ,The Journal of Socio-Economics,

37, 789–820

8

73 . Mark R. Rutgers(1999) , Be rational! But what does it mean?

A history of the idea of rationality and its relation to management thought,

Journal of Management History, Vol. 5 No. 1 , pp. 17-35

74 . HEINZ K. KLEIN and RUDY HIRSCHHEIM(19919) , RATIONALITY

CONCEPTS IN INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

METHODOLOGIES, Accting., Mgmt. &Info. Tech., Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 157-187.

75. M. Shamsul Haque(1997) , INCONGRUITY BETWEEN BUREAUCRACY

AND SOCIETY IN DEVELOPING NATIONS: A CRITIQUE, PEACE &

CHANGE, Vol. 22 , No. 4, 432–462.

76. Nancy DiTomaso (1993) , WEBER’S SOCIAL HISTORY AND ETZIONI’S

STRUCTURAL THEORY OF CHARISMA IN ORGANIZATIONS:

IMPLICATIONS FOR THINKING ABOUT CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP ,

Leadership Quarterly, 4(3/4), 257-275.

77. Keith Tribe (2007) , Talcott Parsons as translator of Max Weber’s basic

sociological categories, History of European Ideas, 33 , 212–233.

78. Arthur A. Felts and Philip H. Jos (1996) , The contemporary challenge

to the administrative state: a Weberian analysis, Journal of Management

History, Vol. 2, No. 1 , pp. 21-36.

79. Joel A. Ryman and Craig A. Turner (2007) , The modern Weberian thesis:

a short review of the literature, Journal of Enterprising Communities: People

and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 175-187.

X و Y

9

80.William B. Wolf (2000) , Reflections on the history of management thought

, Journal of of Management History, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1996, pp. 4-10.

81. Pasi Pyo¨ria (2005) , Information technology, human relations and knowledge

work teams , Team Performance Management , Vol. 11, No. 3/4, pp. 104-112.

82. Kevin T. Mahoney and David B. Baker(2002) , Elton Mayo and Carl Rogers:

A Tale of Two Techniques, Journal of Vocational Behavior 60, 437–450 .

83. Van Nostrand Reinhold , Hawthorne Revisited , the papers delivered at the

Hawthorne symposium eventually incorporated in a book to be published by

Van Nostrand Reinhold.

84. Terns 0. J. Ananaba (1981) , MANAGEMENT BY MOTIVATION,

Engineering Management International, 1 ,63-71.

85. Eric B. Dent (2002) , the messy history of OB & OD : how three stands came

to be seen as one rope, Management Decision , Vol. 40, N. 3, pp. 266-280.

86. Ansfied B. Weinert (1986) , Testing Argyris’ Theory of Organizational

Behavior, Journal of Management Studies, August 1986.

87. Charles M. Carson(2005) , A historical view of Douglas McGregor’s TheoryY

, Management Decision, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 450-460.

88. Kelly Dye and Albert J. Mills and Terrance Weatherbee(2005) , Maslow:

man interrupted: reading management theory in context , Management

Decision, Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 1375-1395.

89. Dave McMahon and Jon C. Carr(1999) , The contributions of Chester

Barnard to strategic management theory, Journal of Management History,

Vol. 5, No. 5 , pp. 228-240.

90. William B. Wolf(1995) , Decision processes as analysed by Chester I.

Barnard, Journal of Management History, Vol. 1, No. 4 , pp. 228-240.

91. James Hoopes (2002) , managing a riot : Chester Barnard and social unrest,

Management Decision, Vol. 40, No. 10, pp. 1013-1023.

92. Susan A. Lynham (2000) , Theory Building in the Human Resource

Development Profession , HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

QUARTERLY, vol. 11, no. 2.

93. Julia Storberg-Walker and Thomas J. Chermack(2007) , Four Methods for

Completing the Conceptual Development Phase of Applied Theory Building

Research in HRD , HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY,

vol. 18, no. 4.

94. Richard J. Torraco(2007) ,Challenges and Choices for Theoretical Research

in Human Resource Development ,HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

QUARTERLY, vol. 15, no. 2.

95. James C. Dingley(1997) , Durkheim, Mayo, Morality and Management ,

Journal of Business Ethics , 16: 1117–1129.

96. Edgar Schein(2011) Douglas McGregor: theoretician, moral philosopher or

behaviorist? An analysis of the interconnections between assumptions, values

and behaviour , Journal of Management History ,Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 156-164.

97. Thomas C. Head (2011) Douglas McGregor’s legacy: lessons learned, lessons

lost ,Journal of Management History,Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 202-216.

98. Milorad M. Novicevic, Leigh Ann Bynum and Mario Hayek And Tony

Fang(2011),Integrating Barnard’s and contemporary views of industrial

relations and HRM , Journal of Management History ,Vol. 17 ,No. 1, pp. 126-

138.

11

ی

99. John Barton and Tim Haslett (2007) , Analysis, Synthesis, Systems Thinking

and the Scientific Method: Rediscovering the Importance of Open Systems

, Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res. 24, 143-155 (2007).

100. Dante P. Martinelli (2001) , Systems Hierarchies and Management,

Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res.18, 69-82 .

101. Jennifer Wilby(2006) , An Essay on Kenneth E. Boulding’s General

Systems Theory: The Skeleton of Science , Systems Research and Behavioral

Science Syst. Res. 23, 695-699.

102. Markus Schwaninger1 and Stefan Gro¨sser(2008) , System Dynamics as

Model-Based Theory Building, Systems Research and Behavioral Science

Syst. Res. 25, 447-465.

103. Yan Zexian (2007) ,A New Approach to Studying Complex Systems

,Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res. 24, 403-416 .

104. Aaron C.T. Smith and Fiona Graetz(2007) ,Complexity theory and

organizing form dualities, Management Decision , Vol. 44 No. 7, pp. 851-870.

105. Aaron C.T. Smith (2007) , Complexity theory for organizational futures

studies, foresight , VOL. 7, NO. 3, pp. 22-30.

106. Terence Love and Trudi Cooper(2007) , Complex built-environment

design: four extensions to Ashby , Kybernetes Vol. 36 No. 9/10, 2007

pp. 1422-1435.

107. Professor Sushil (1997) , Flexible Systems Management: An Evolving

Paradigm, Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 259–275.

11

108. FRED LUTHANS (1973) , THE CONTINGENCY THEORY OF

MANAGEMENT:A path out of the jungle, BUSINESS HORIZONS

the University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

109. David J. Lemak (2004) , Leading students through the management theory

jungle by following the path of the seminal theorists :A paradigmatic approach ,

Management Decision, Vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 1309-1325.

110. C. John Tarter and Wayne K. Hoy(1998) , Toward a contingency theory

of decision making , Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp.

212-228,

111. Brian R. Fry and Lotte L. Thomas (2004) , Mary Parker Follett: assessing

the contribution and impact of her writings, Journal of Management History,

Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 11-19.

112. Dafna Eylon (1998) , Understanding empowerment and resolving its

paradox Lessons from Mary Parker Follett , Journal of Management History,

Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 16-28.

113. Ellen S. OConnor (2000) , Decades ahead of her time : advancing

stakeholder theory through the ideas of Mary Parker Follett , Journal of

Management History, Vol.6, No. 4, pp. 167-190.

114. Melissa A. Schilling (2000) , Integrating Follett: history , philosophy and

management , Journal of Management History ,Vol.6, No. 5, pp. 224-242.

115. Mark Mendenhall and James Macomber and Marc Cutright (2000) , Mary

Parker Follett: prophet of chaos and complexity , Journal of Management

History, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 191-204.

116. Lori Verstegen Rayan and Matthew A. Rutherford (2000) , Mary Parker

Follett: individualist or collectivist or both , Journal of Management History,

Vol. 6, No.5, pp. 207-223.

117. Behrooz Kalantari(2010) ,Herbert A. Simon on making decisions: enduring

insights and bounded rationality ,Journal of Management History, Vol. 16, No. 4,

pp. 509-520.

12

118. Gerry Kerr(2007) ,The development history and philosophical sources of

Herbert Simon’s Administrative Behavior , Journal of Management History

,Vol. 13 , No. 3, pp. 255-268.

119. Deena Weinstein and Michael A. Weinstein (1998) , Is postmodern

organization theory sceptical?, Journal of Management History,

Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 350-362.

120 . James A. Stever(1998) ,Organizational scepticism ,Journal of Management

History, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 289-302.

121. PER OLOF BERG (1989) , POSTMODERN MANAGEMENT? FROM

FACTS TO FICTION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE , Scand. J. Management

Vol. 5. No. 3. pp. X1-217.

122. Dan Ward and Chris Quaid and Gabe Mounce (2008) , Postmodern

Program Management, Defense AT&L: May-June 2008.

123. Ralph Lewis(1994) , From Chaos to Complexity: Implications for

Organizations , Executive Development, Vol. 7 No. 4, 1994, pp. 16-17.

124. Joep P. Cornelissen and Mario Kafouros (2008) , Metaphors and Theory

Building in Organization Theory: What Determines the Impact of a Metaphor

125. Hope-Arlene Fennell (1994) , Organizational Linkages: Expanding the

Existing Metaphor , Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 32, No. 1.

126. Gazendam, Henk W.M. (1993). Conceptual analysis and specification of

Morgan’s metaphors using the CAST method , Variety Controls Variety: On the

Use of Organization Theories in Information Management. Groningen: Wolters-

Noordhoff.

127. Yvon Pesqueux(1994) ,Discussing the company: model, metaphor and image

,Management Decision , 37/10 , 817±824.

13

128. Charles F. Abel and Arthur J. Sementelli (2005) ,Evolutionary critical

theory, metaphor, and organizational change , Journal of Management

Development, Vol. 24 ,No. 5, pp. 443-458.

129. James Rowe(2005) ,Process metaphor and knowledge Management ,

Kybernetes ,Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 770-783.

130. Alexia Lennon and Andrew Wollin (2001) , learning organizations :

empirically investigating metaphors, Journal of Intellectual Capital ,Vol. 2, No.

4, pp. 410-422.

131. Cliff Oswick and John Montgomery (1999) ,Images of an organisation:

the use of metaphor in a multinational company (2001) , Journal of

Organizational Change Management, Vol. 12, No. 6.

132. Peter R.J. Trim and Yang-Im Lee(2004) ,A reflection on theory building

and the development of management knowledge ,Management Decision,

Vol. 42, No. 3/4, pp. 473-480.

133. Charlotte D. Shelton and John R. Darling (2003) , From theory to practice:

using new science concepts to create learning organizations, The Learning

Organization ,Volume 10 ,Number 6, pp. 353-360.

134. K. Unnikrishnan Nair (2001) , adaptation to creation : process of

organizational learning and increasing complexity of learning systems, Systems

Reasearch and Behavioral Science, 18 , pp. 505 – 521.

135. Kun Chang Lee and Sangjae Lee and In Won Kang (2005) , KMPI:

measuring knowledge management performance ,Information & Management,

42, pp. 469–482.

136. Cliff Oswick et al. (2000) , A DIALOGIC ANALYSIS OF

ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING, Journal of Management Studies , 37:6.

137. Peter L. Cruise (1997) , Are proverbs really so bad? Herbert Simon and the

logical positivist perspective in American public administration , Journal of

Management History, Vol. 3, No. 4 , pp. 342-359.

138. Vincent Calvez and Alain Max Guénette(2003) , An Approach to Change

Management, Thunderbird International Business Review, September–October.

139. Guangming Cao and Steve Clarke and Brian Lehaney(2003) ,Diversity

Management in Organizational Change: Towards a Systemic Framework

,Systems Research and Behavioral Science , 20, 231-242.

140. Peng Wen-shien (2008) , A CRITIQUE OF FRED W. RIGGS’ ECOLOGY

OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION , International Public Management Review

,Volume 9, Issue1, pp. 213-226.

141. Adrian Carr(2000) , Critical theory and the management of change in

organizations , Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 13, No. 3,

pp. 208-220.

142 . Jesse F. Dillard and John T. Rigsby and Carrie Goodman (2000) ,The

making and remaking of organization context Duality and the

Institutionalization process , Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,

Vol. 17 , No. 4, pp. 506-542.

143.Robert Moussetis (2011) , Ansoff revisited :How Ansoff interfaces with both

the planning and learning schools of thought in strategy, Journal of Management

History, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 102-125.

144. Emerson Wagner Mainardes and Helena Alves and Mario Raposo (2011)

Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve , Management Decision, Vol. 49 , No. 2 ,pp.

226-252.

14

145. Americo Nobre G.G. Amorim (2007) , Virtual Organization Theory:

Current Status and Demands , Amorim, A. N. G. G., in IFIP International

Federation for Information Processing, Volume 251, Integration and Innovation

Orient to E-Society Volume 1, Wang, W. (Eds), (Boston: Springer), pp. 1-8.

146. Zhang Jing and Faerman Sue R. (2003) , Divergent Approaches and

Converging Views: Drawing Sensible Linkages between Knowledge

Management and Organizational Learning , Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii

International Conference on System Sciences.

147. Abdel-Moteleb Abou-Bakr and Woodman Mark (2007) ,Towards a

Knowledge Management System Development Method: Critique of Some

Relevant Theories and Methodologies ,Journal of Information & Knowledge

Management, Vol. 6, No. 1 , pp.33–43.

148. French Steven (2009) Critiquing the language of strategic management

,Journal of Management Development, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 6-17.

149. Dobuzinskis Laurent (1997) , Historical and epistemological trends in

public administration , Journal of Management History, Vol. 3 No. 4, 1997, pp.

298-316.

PowerPoint