phenomenons finale

8/6/2019 Phenomenons Finale

1/14

ABC Of The UniverseApproaching the Grand Unified Theory

byHakan OK

Abstract

This paper was intended to make another step closer to the grand unified theory by approachingit with an unconventional explanation of the (observable) visible and sensible universe as webelieve we know. But senses are not limited to ours (5). There is indeed one more and most

important sense to be recognized and we all must be aware of: Our Intellect, is our 6 th sense andit is the strongest, the most powerful, sometimes maybe even the most glorious gift given to

creatures given by their creator. Even, can we say it is ?; Whatever, not going to dive intoidolism in here.

This paper does not contain any (or many, prefer having none) mathematical, physical or otherscientific formulas which are normally being used by science to explain, describe and show

theories, theses, hypotheses and models of the so called known universe, which can besometimes (or always ?) dogmatic. As science is officially no (and in-officially a) religion but at

least should not be one, I can't accept any dogmatism within assumptions of science; But theyhappen, wonder why. What we think to know is always just a little fraction of observations and

(or even) reality, which might be infinite to us or our abilities and (of our) understanding.This paper was meant to reflect my totally subjective point of view, as well as my subjectivethinking about the matters I am trying to explain in here. As i am not able and also don't wantand don't need to be objective on any matter which needs thinking (neither is anyone else), I do

confess and believe and take it real and the truth, that a subjective approach well combined withphilosophy should and is more than enough to forward my mind and opinion in this paper (to

others).The purpose and reason that made me writing this paper was encouraged by the FQXicommunity and their actual essay contest which I am not participating (as of today: 02/23/2011):Is reality digital or analog ?. As I had no real motivation to write preferable anything similar in

English (about GUT or similar things), this occasion (or lets call it opportunity) i could not have

leaved without participating with a (this) paper. But instead of sending in, misusing it for my owndirty explanations. Means, a good way to gain writing skills which I can use to write my own book.

But that book still has to be written, don't know when...This paper does indeed approximate the contest-topic of the community mentioned above,although it does not seem to do so at the very first glance, be patient. I am going to explain the

connection between REALITY and the great unified theory from my philosophical point of view,which will answer the original question of the topic.This paper has been written in English to avoid any complex sentences and to speak veryvery plain so that nobody could say: I didn't understand it...!. To understand the message of this

paper, one does neither have to be a professional physicist, nor a genius, as I am none of thesetoo, but writer of this paper. I assured this paper to be readable whilst I wrote it in English

because writing it in Turkish or German may have caused it to be not understandable as I wouldhave had used more (too) complex constructed sentences. So this one is easy and simple because

I am not a native English speaking person.The purpose of the universe is to be observed and its the best thing one can do with it: observe.

We are here to observe and understand. And we have a powerful tool to do that: Our intellect.To have a good understanding of this papers point, it is necessary to know and understand what

the terms Digital and Analog mean. To do this, I would like to refer to Wikipedia where you cansearch and find the explanation of this terms.

...


2/14


byHakan OK

Prolog

The universe is neither analog nor digital, it is singular (that I am sure of and don't need toexplain yet) and infinite (that I have to prove).For a universe to be able acting as if it were endless in space AND time (observed fact), so thatit can be dated back to a beginning but its end shall not and will not be determined by anyone, it(the universe as we observe) has to be infinite and one infinite universe is sufficient to form a

(what we observe) fully functional, functioning and will function, infinitely universe that isshapeless, unique in every part of its space-time and every moment of its existence, rather than

an infinite number of un-unlimited (finite) and closed captioned (parallel) universes with each ofthem having different (but supposed unique among themselves) faiths and some of them

insufficient to form (by themselves will or by random happenings) exactly ordered laws, with this,self-rendered unable to form some life in it. No life means: Nobody who could ask: What the

heck is going on ?

Infinity does not need to expand, nor extend and of course needs no container as it has neitherthe need for, nor is any shape or any form necessary.

...

3


3/14


byHakan OK

Monolog

There can be only one infinity (infinite space-time and infinite matter in it, which is theultimate cause of space itself and as well cause of the observed time) and not infinite numbers oflimited spaces (universes) with unlimited possibilities that may happen here or may not happen

there. Why it should be like this we can see in the ultimate and final revelation.Lets have a look at what ALLAH is telling us about the universe in generally and for the oneswho are willing to accept (or not) an intelligent design, whom is indeed fully capable of creatingwithout faults and needs no experiments in its creation and Being of THE Law-Maker:

Have not the unbelievers ever considered that the skies and the earth were once one mass, then

We split them asunder? And We have created every living thing from water. Will they still notbelieve? [21:30]

He is the One Who has created the night and the day and the sun and the moon: all (the celestial

bodies) move swiftly in an orbit of their own. [21:33]

The sun and the moon move along their computed courses. [55:5]

Then He settled to the heaven, while it was still gas, and He said to it, and to the earth: "Comewillingly or unwillingly." They said, "We come willingly." [41:11]

He created seven heavens in harmony. You do not see any disorder in the creation by theGracious. Keep looking; do you see any flaw? [67:3]

Then look again twice; your eyes will come back humiliated and tired. [67:4]

We have adorned the lower heaven with lamps, and We made it with projectiles against thedevils; and We prepared for them the retribution of the blazing fire. [67:5]

If they are told "Do not make evil in the land," they say, "But we are the reformers!" [2:11]

No, they are the evildoers, but they do not perceive. [2:12]

If they are told, "acknowledge as the people have acknowledged," they say, "Shall we

acknowledge as the fools have acknowledged?" No, they are the fools but they do not know.[2:13]

They said, "Be Jews or Nazarenes so that you may be guided!" Say, "No, rather the creed of

Abraham, monotheism; for he was not of those who set up partners." [2:135]

Say, "We acknowledge God and what was sent down to us and what was sent down to Abraham,Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, the Patriarchs, what was given to Moses and Jesus, and what was given to

the prophets from their Lord; we do not make a distinction between any of them and to Him wepeacefully surrender." [2:136]

As it neither does need (for an ultimate Intelligence who creates the laws itself) to makeexperiments, neither to gamble with unpredictable randomness, uncertainty and rolling dices

where the observers (exactly us asking: Why is this ?) shall not see or be aware of them,

whereas on the other hand revealing them (to us that we may be aware), that everything hasbeen created to serve a purpose and be observed (by us), not only by natural (provided, our 5)

senses, but the observers (our) Intelligence and/or Intellect (6th sense) too.

...

4


4/14


byHakan OK

Here we get some questions of science answered (in the final and ultimate version ofrevelation):

Inter-Stellar And Inter-Galactic Travelling

He created the human from clay, like pottery. [55:14]

The Jinn He created from a smokeless fire. [55:15]

Those in the heavens and earth ask Him, everyday He is in some matter. [55:29]

O tribes of Jinn and humans, if you can penetrate the diameters of the heavens and theearth, then go ahead and penetrate. You will not penetrate without authority. [55:33]

He sends against both of you projectiles of fire and copper; so you will not succeed. [55:35]

Science Trying To Calculate The End Of The Universe

They ask you regarding the moment: "When will be its time?" Say, "Its knowledge is with myLord, none can reveal its time except Him. It is heavy through the heavens and the earth; it will

not come to you except suddenly." They ask you, as if you are too curious about it! Say, "Itsknowledge is with God, but most people do not know." [7:187]

They ask you about the moment: "When is its appointed time?"

You have no knowledge if it.

To your Lord is its term. [79:42-44]

The people ask you regarding the moment. Say, "Its knowledge is with God. For all that you knowthe moment may be near!" [33:63]

About Spirit/Soul

They ask you concerning the Spirit. Say, "The Spirit is from the command of my Lord, and the

knowledge you were given was but very little." [17:85]

About Timing

They ask you regarding the new moons, say, "They are a timing mechanism for the people aswell as for the Pilgrimage."Piety is not that you would enter a home from its back, but piety is whoever is aware and comesto the homes through their main doors. Be conscientious of God that you may succeed.[2:189]

...

5


5/14


byHakan OK

Some (Stupid) Questions Of Me

Zero = Nothingness ?

Does nothing exist ?What IS nothing ?IS it or IS it NOT ?

Is -1 less than 0 (zero), like: [-1


6/14


byHakan OK

Matters

For a closer explanation of this matter and Matter at all, I would like to start at a point that has

to be re-considered by the so called positive & claiming to be objective science.

Depending on the distance between two galaxies, there is an observable and computable aspectof increasing gravity at clumping of mass (higher density) at and to the center of each galaxy and

in traverse (tersine) the density becoming lesser (lower) as distance within the space to othermatter/mass/clumps increases. Means, closer to galaxy-clumps you have a higher density of

matter (denser) resulting in greater gravitational forces; And far from galaxies you have a lowerdensity of matter if there is any at all. Which brings us to the result that the gravity within a

galaxy must be stronger than the gravity far away from galaxies (the so called empty space orlower density matter) within intergalactic space. I should have painted a picture of a graph that

shows the gravitation between two clumps (for example galaxies) and their distance to each other.I'll take care of it later...

What is Dark Matter and how does it behave on the gravitational scale ?What dark matter is or not is, I am not able to tell/say yet. But observational results, obtainedfrom actual happenings (i.e. NASA, Web, ect.) and logical thinking (what logic ?) lead me to this

(maybe pseudo-) fact: Regions within the intergalactic space that have very low gravitationaleffects, low-density fields of matter, as explained above, may reach below g=1/ a critical density

where matter, space & time can not exist anymore and folding into or onto another dimensionbeyond the universe itself to a upper (5th) Hyperspace-like continuum, where, of course, time

stands still and space is zero. That sounds kinda science-fiction, I confess. But if we were not ableto travel beyond a limited speed (Lightspeed) or by using black holes (condensed, high

gravitational fields)to take far distances in rational time and without being hurt (like spagetti),

would it not be rational to think of the opposite side of gravitation delivering this travel ?On the other hand, this low-density areas in the intergalactic space may be an explanation of,

what science has a habit to call, Redshift. It may cause a red filter to the lights passing thru.Means, effecting the wavelength of light to decrease. We know that a light-ray, diving from air intowater (from low density to high density material), does being effected by two (?) ways;1th, it gets angular deflected, according to its coming angle (but not with a right-angle of 90).2nd, its wavelength increases (EVERY angle, including the right-angle), right ?

No, that last sentence, I am not sure about.

So, what is Dark Energy then ?Honestly, I don't have a clue. I am not even sure if it needs any dark energy if there's already

something called dark matter. As with normal matter having some kind of energy effecting thruelectromagnetism, gravitation, strong force & weak force and dark matter seems to be the

counterpart and/or source of matter (excluding possibility of that antimatter stuff totally at themoment...), but not exactly behaving like a counterpart.

What is space ?Space is made of a group of any (at least 2) atoms or a molecule and the distance of atoms toeach other. This distance (between the atoms) has to be below a critical density of matter, sothat gravity does not become less than 1/ g and temperature shall not become "absolute zero"between them. Increasing the distance beyond critical density and decreasing the temperature to

-273 C (absolute zero, 0 K) would mean TOTAL VACUUM and in that vacuum there is no spaceanymore. Means it is Non-space, with a zero distance. This explains the question of what dark

matter is and what its behaves on the gravitational scale are.

7


7/14


byHakan OK

Galactic DistortionAs of Figure.1 (above); From the point of View [A] we look in a right-angle straight onto a Galaxy

with a center [B] and a point at the perimeter [C]. The Galaxy center [B] is in a distance of 10

million Lj. From our point of view, has a Diameter of 100.000 Lj., a radius of 50.000 Lj. and makesa full turn (360) around itself within 2.2 million years. These values are Astrophysical very

possible, although there might not be galaxies at this values observed, these are possible andgiven values. As the distance from [A] to [B] is 10 million Lj., the distance from [A] to [C] must be

10.000.124,99 Lj., with a difference of 124,99 Lj. Which means practically a light starting from [B]

arrives 124,99 years earlier at point [A] than a light that started from [C]. This is the timedistortion of [A] to [B] related to [A] to [C]. As the galaxy we are observing has a radius of 50thousand Lj. and therefore a perimeter of 314.159 Lj. (2r*Pi) with a full spin (360) of it in 2.2

million years. Which is a spin of 0.14 Lj. per year multiplicated with the difference of the lightarriving from [B] and [C] (124,99), [C] becomes 17,8498 Lj. distorted relative to its observed

position at [C] and on the perimeter bow back-spinned at [D]. Which is further an angle of(360/314159*17,8498) of ~0,020454.

This means also, that the bigger an observed galaxy is (diameter) the more distortion we are ableto find between its center and its perimeter (outer limits). The farther it is the smaller is the final

pictures distortion. As well as, the closer we are to the observed galaxy, again the distortion of thefinally observed picture must be bigger. Which is at least really one reason more not to rely on

observations, of our 5 senses ONLY, without considering it WITH our Intellect. It is a feature of theuniverse itself, proving and showing us that observing means not everything, but using Intellect

by thinking is a gift very special, for a THINKING Mankind. The observed and fixated picture of agalaxy and its subsidiaries must be re-considered with this factors:

1. Distance to our point of view.2. Diameter (and or radius) of the observed galaxy.

3. The galaxies spinning speed.

4. Difference between center and perimeter points.5. Change of view by different observing times between center and perimeter.

6. And at least, how it might look if added up to its momentary look (+Distance in Lj.). This

does not include new stars born and died within the given (distance from point of view) time....to be continued...

Getting closer... But hard to switch between Turkish-, German- and English-Thinking.(not finished yet...)

Figure.1: Calculation Of Galactic Distortion

8


8/14

Galactic Distances

Page 1

From our point of view (A) / Camera - All Values in Lightyears & Years

NOTE: Assumed Age of Universe is 13 .7 Billion Years Watching-Angle onto Galaxy is "Right-Angled (90 Degrees)"

Distance (A) To Galaxy Center (B) Diameter Of Galaxy Distance (A) to Perimeter (C) Difference (Lj.) / Shifted Picture (Years) Perimeter ~ (Diameter x Pi) Given Full Rotation Time (Years) Distortion Center To Perimeter Shift To (D) Lj. By Diff.

100.000 100.000 111.803,39887498900000 11.803,39887498950000000 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 1685,5214178662300000

1.000.000 100.000 1.001.249,21972504000000 1.249,21972503932000000 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 178,3881595865000000

10.000.000 100.000 10.000.124,99921880000000 124,99921876005800000 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 17,8498466982301000100.000.000 100.000 100.000.012,49999900000000 12,49999922513960000 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 1,7849957152534900

2.500.000 200.000 2.501.999,20063936000000 1.999,20063936058000000 628.318,530717959 2.200.000 570,9703674242940000

10.000.000.000 100.000 10.000.000.000,12500000000000 ,12500000000000000 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 0,0178499582590329

13.700.000.000 100.000 13.700.000.000,09120000000000 ,09124183654785160 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 0,0130293037908532

15.000.000.000 100.000 15.000.000.000,08330000000000 ,08333396911621090 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 0,0119000629622712

75.000 100.000 90.138,78188659970000 15.138,78188659970000000 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 2161,8129981472700000

50.000 100.000 70.710,67811865480000 20.710,67811865480000000 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 2957,4779194740300000

25.000 100.000 55.901,69943749470000 30.901,69943749470000000 314.159,265358979 2.200.000 4412,7523607397000000

9


9/14


byHakan OK

Phenomenons

Dark Matter & Energy;(04.04.2011-00:00)It is an observed fact (I assume) and obvious

that gravity has no counter-pole, instead consistsof a monopole which is, the attraction of matter

(atoms) with each other by a so called graviton.This attraction has its opponent or counterfeit inthe centrifugal force and/or motion, as seen onplanetary, galactic and cluster/super-clusterscales. Although it seems not to be possible yet(may change any moment) telling the nature(purpose/intention) and behavior of Dark Matterand/or Dark Energy between large clumps of

matter like galaxies, local galaxy-clusters and super-clusters, for a moment we should

assume that, the bigger (/more/grater sized)matter is clumped, the lower gets the density ofspace and the gravitational force between thoseclumps, again leaving gaps of low-density andlow-gravity which are acting (beyond any criticaldensity of matter and its gravitational effects) asa phenomenon we call dark matter & energy.Dark matter IS matter beyond (below) critical

density (I call it TOTAL SINGULARITY), TOTAL VACUUM and dark energy IS the counterfeit/opponent (itsdi-/counter-pole) to gravity itself (my assumption of zero-gravity). Do NOT scramble the total singularity

explained here with any (various) conventional singularities caused by black-holes. Black holes are high-density matter clumps with high gravitational and electromagnetic emission effects, whereas thesingularity caused by low-density matter has NO gravitational effect at all (or at least a very small) and

either no electromagnetic emission and thatswhy it's called DARK MATTER. Beyond (below ofcourse) a critical density, matter seems toloose any (gravitational) connection to eachother and starts acting in a very strange kind

of being, like a singularity, but this time it is atotal one. Dark matter, as the name says, is

dark, it does not emit heat (photons) and/orany other electromagnetic force (Which means it

has a heat temperature of absolute zero.), hasno gravitational effects (because of low-densitymatter beyond/below the CDH), neither does itoccupy any space (nothingness but WITH avolume of vacuum forming a gap) and has acause of stopping time (timeless/irrelevant). If

you get in touch with dark matter, either you add matter (maybe a finger) to its mass, disturbing its low-density state, causing it to get being or it evaporates that moment your finger and spills it out

somewhere else, preferable at the opposite side of the dark-matter-concentration. And this happens in no-time. Whether you prefer a black hole or worm-hole to make far distances close or use the dark matter

clumps (they are not clumps but however...) to jump trough far distances, the less pain generating is thelast one. But these dark matter clumps are not even and have no symmetric shapes because of the

various matter-clumps around its location (eg. Two or more galaxies withdrawing, closing or passing oneach other), that's a problem... But one is for sure, if there is no matter beyond (below) critical densitybetween clumps, then there is a gravitational connection which makes any dark matter betweenimpossible. That means the clumps are connected with each other. So it needs big (maybe very big)distances between clumps of matter to make any dark matter possible, to rip apart their gravitationalconnection. Photons coming from far and entering that dark matter are being sucked on one side and

Illustration 1: The Shape may change in relation to gravitational fields andmatter-clumps around effecting.


10/14


byHakan OK

spilled out on the other side of the (non-) volume, maybe causing the redshift. I don't know how thisshould work, but it was worth some thinking...

(pictures and context, updated on: 13.04.2011 12:37)

12.04.2011 09:40 Fragment-Thoughts

Critical Density Horizon (CDH);-Density (or Pressure)-Mass

-Distance-Temperature

-Gravity-EM emission (heat)

According to Dark Matter:Low-density/-gravity gaps (volumes of vacuum) are Dark Matter. Because of the clumping of galaxiessomewhere far away, from galaxy-clumps, below (beyond) the critical density horizon, there are regionsof non-matter I call dark-matter-gaps.The point is, that you can not approach the gap of singularity without disturbing its state.

Dark Matter Gap, Vacuum, Total Singularity, Volume of Non-Emitting Vacuum.Close to each galactic core density and gravity of matter increases, up to black-hole singularities. This

black-hole singularities are no Total Singularities, (as) because they emit electromagnetism with highfrequency and have dense gravitational fields. They have effects on Space-Time, according to the theory

of relativity.Matter do get colder if density decreases. Zero/Absolute Zero beyond (below) CDH means lower(decreased) frequency (below/beyond microwaves).

Volumes of lower-density and -gravity gaps, with decreasing density and gravitational effect (and orbitalmove?), by increasing distance.Energy is decreasing with decreasing density. Beyond CDH, no (EM) energy observable. (12:08)

According to Dark Energy:As we have analyzed before, the counterfeit or opposite force of (the pulling force) gravity is, move(usually orbital move, pushing matter away from the gravity-/matter-clumps, pushing force).

Prediction: Distance to next CDH from ourworld is 50.000 Lightyears.(14.04.2011 14:30)

Hyperspace:As seen on the left, there might be solutions tobridge the distance between two galaxies via this

so called dark matter gaps (hyperspace).Depending on calculations (which I didn't), it

may be possible to find CDH's not only betweengalaxies, but also between stars. Which mayallow us to travel interstellar distances in lesstime than we assumed before. This gaps or

fields of vacuum may provide a shortcut troughhyperspace (the 5th dimension), just like a star-

gate, as seen on TV. These gaps might be more even than gaps between galaxies. Still sounds likescience-fiction, right ?


11/14


byHakan OK

The feature of matter is:It clumps to molecular structures. This is because of the gravitational force. A clumping above the critical

density horizon and density triggers the EM-Force and causes heat (above 0 Kelvin).Dark Matter Gaps (clouds) depend on distance and mass of matter-clumps on their peripheral shape....to be continued (not finished yet...)


12/14

-ismi ALLAH 'i Rahman-i Rahim...akan OKhenomenons2utlak Dzenden Isnarak ve Yrngelerde Hareket Ederek Tekaml Eden Evren ve nsan Hipotezinin Makalesi.

DF3.04.2011, Cumartesi 13:00akale: Phenomenons2azan : Hakan OK

Phenomenons 2he Truth;

23.04.2011 13:08)is a well known common sense and by some people ultimately known FACT (but officially kept under raps)at, today we all are aware of the truth about the universe and how it DID NOT and COULD NOT HAVE happen. I

ust don't understand, why this so called scientific thinking people (scientists), particularly Astrophysicists,heoretical Physicists and Quantum Physicists (at least the ones alive today), still persist on an outdated model, ample theory, an assumed hypothesis like Big Bang. For the common public and majority of some scientistsmaybe unaware of all the complicated details that leave and lead to a trail or believed truth in theironsciousness) the model indeed seems to be at first glance the best explanation of how the universe becameeing. But at the second glance, one may not be that much convinced about all the assumptions that had to beade (even fabricated) to make it (the model) what it is and how it is supposed to work today. All those

ssumptions that make the model/theory relevant to the public ARE NOT facts, nevertheless it is being threateneds kind of a (sometimes ultimate) truth by this public.

evelations, Hoax or Truth?ave you ever thought of the possibility that revelations might be truth or even just considered for a moment thatey may eventually be information for a possible (eventually) ultimate knowledge?am surprised of the behavior of science, not considering revelations as a possible source of knowledge , whichey should at least try to falsify*. Although there's another possibility of revelations to be disinformation, but this

as to be falsified like any other theory*. That is indeed not a very objective approach of science to informationat may eventually be ultimate knowledge. If there is even a little chance that it might be truth, why not using it?

or example:either the Jews nor the Nazarenes will be pleased with you until you follow their creed. Say, "The guidance isod's guidance." If you follow their wishes after the knowledge has come to you, then none can help or protectou against God. [2:120]

id those who reject not see that the heavens and the earth were one mass and We tore them apart? That Wemade from the water everything that lives. Will they not acknowledge? [21:30]

When Our signs are recited to them, they say, "We have listened, and if we wish, we could have said the samehing. This is nothing but tales of the ancients!" [8:31]

he one who says to his parents: "Enough of you! Are you promising me that I will be resurrected, when theenerations who died before me never came back?" While they both will implore God: "Woe to you; acknowledge!or God's promise is the truth." He would say, "This is nothing but tales from the past!" [46:17]

When Our signs are recited to him, he says: "Tales of the ancients!" [83:13]hese words have been revealed more than 1400 years ago and still we find persons on this world that are fittingto what was described. The last 4 revelations I've listed above fit very well onto Hawking nowadays (May 2011).

What is it with science and religion?eligion has its own rationality and science has its own rationality. What if their rationalities do not count until bothccept and respect each other? Whereas many religious rationalities even differ from each other. But they allmost of them) meat at one common and single point: Everything was/is created by A CREATOR !any religions (except Islam) would go better if they could accept (re-considered) scientific approach. I do notount Islam with the many religions, because Islam does already impose scientific approach from beginning to endt least Islam's holy book the Quran). Unfortunally the Quran isn't being read, preferably burned (by otherligious) and ignored by others (almost every scientist).cience itself would go better and come finally to any conclusions if it would see revelations as eventualformation of truth, that shall become knowledge and would be very helpful to solve any problems. It is thetention of religion, or should be at least, to help mankind solving any problems.he Quran:

rom the point of the Quran, there's no problem at all with the universe we are living in and we are able tobserve. All predictions do fit neatless into observations, as long as you interpret the revelations right. To interprete revelations right, you have to have the right intentions. The Quran would never mislead to any wrong action asng as you have done the interpretations with the right intentions. What are those right intentions? Funny but,ou can't be aware of the right intentions unless you read the Quran. It teaches almost everything you need tochieve reaching the and any truth. And indeed, it's (chronologically revealed) first verse teaches: Read!:

Son Deiiklik: 24.05.11 - 14:32:15 | Sayfa 1/2 - Phenomenons2
http://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons2.pdfhttp://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons2.pdf


13/14


6:0 In the name of God, the Gracious, the Compassionate.6:1 Read in the name of your Lord who has created.6:2 He created the human being from an embryo.6:3 Read, and your Lord is the Generous One.6:4 The One who taught by the pen.6:5 He taught the human being what he did not know.

hich scientist could say anything controversial to these verses? In which rationality does it not fit? None! But theoint is, many of them are not even aware of it because they didn't read it... They kept their distance, to not beingeen as fools by the public. They take care merely of what people would say, than of what the truth really may ber is. I see it as a kind of intentional purpose of science, denying revelations, so that we all get stuck on thisanet and do not mature (science calls it evolution) into what we were (intelligently) designed for.

Will you not consider, will you not acknowledge ?Where you see randomness and uncertainty, I see intention and purpose.Where you see evolution and mutation, I see maturing and evaluation.ou call it evolution with a huge source of billion years, whereas you can't be sure if it is what it looks.

Where you see explosion and expansion, I see creation and orbiting.or you it may have no sense at all, for me it is to sense itself.

Where you are copying and repeating mindless, without using own intellect;

believe, have faith and use intellect to read and understand what is given.We all observing the same, it is the question of: What we want to see, what we want it to be.ou fear what it could be, I do not and know that it is with purpose and intention.ou fear death, I do not. I hope to achieve the knowledge useful after death.ou don't believe in hereafter, stuck into the material world and all that matters is matter.o way to convince you of things you can't sense. Your unused intellect won't help you to understand what isense.ou keep digging into matter spending billions in search of God/-s, unaware or denying of: There is no God/-s.ou know that it needs a Creator to set up a whole universe, but can't accept that you are helpless, hoping forelp of the God/-s.ou are not reading nor accepting truth spoken words, but senseless words of the created, you like them much.ou call it rational and science without knowing the meaning of the words, that what you think is the truth will

ave you an orphan and alone.ou fear to fail in a limited life, but don't fear a life in the dark or fire of eternal.ou are not aware of the ancients life told to you so you may consider, but wherever you can you repeat theiritter.ou don't want to consider and not acknowledge the truth, all you've needed has come and gone with your faith.ou call it a tale where there might be a truth, call it a truth where and whenever you can not proof.aith you say is ignorance and nonsense, don't you consider the senseless fabricated by yourself ?

Will you not acknowledge at least consider after reading this stuff, how can you hope that one day you'll find theuth ?ou think you are thinking and haven't really done yet...ut wherever one says: I think, so I am. your applause is with them.

23.05.2011, Monday 11:00) *If you think this is a poem, you are wrong! It is indeed not...24.05.2011, Tuesday 13:51) **It is a truly shocking circumstance to see, how unaware or intentionallynorant the western world is and behave, if it comes to knowledge (information that eventually is right) thatas it's source in the Quran. The Quran is being rigorously ignored, whereas any other, even the simplest mysticligion, is being elaborated with and in every single detail. But there is hope that one day every single human

hall at least read the Quran once, because we can see that it is not just ignored anymore; People trying (andaving success) to burn it. I can't understand a mind burning a script just because it is from another religion, butwill have the effect that it is not a subject of unawareness and ignorance anymore, no more. If there must beared something than it must be this. And yes, in this case we can say, that the Quran, as an (eventually)timate and final revelation of A CREATOR, must be the ultimate truth, otherwise it would not have been soindly ignored and hatred. It is very obvious that the information and knowledge it is carrying could be of use oneay, for those who haven't read it yet. This leads me (and should you too) to some conclusions I have to come upith, what actually is happening on this world. My conclusions would not interest anyone neither do I want to beisunderstood (although it won't bother me...), as was the Quran. So I better keep my conclusions for myself.

ut, what I had the chance of summarizing for myself, shall not be in vain hopefully. One day it may helpnderstanding the human mind better. For now, it is just a question of stubbornness beliefs, that may change anyme...Updated 23.05.2011

* Updated 24.05.2011ook out for Phenomenons 3 !

Son Deiiklik: 24.05.11 - 14:32:15 | Sayfa 2/2 - Phenomenons2


14/14


DF7.05.2011, Cuma 12:21akale: Phenomenons3azan : Hakan OK

Phenomenons 3

27.05.2011, Friday 12:21)HE POINT:he point is one asking him-/herself: What if...?. This writing wasn't about getting into polemics about science,elief, faith, religion, philosophy and stuff like that, neither is or was any of my writings. It was and still is, aboutonsidering the point that even glorified science and the way it is fabricated and/or sensed today, could be somend of very well setup daydreaming, a dogmatic blind believe into things we are yet unable to explain. It is not auestion of proof or falsifying any theory, neither belief, faith, religion, etc. Just ask yourself: What if I gotverything wrong ?, no matter on which side your staying. Just: What if ?.made a lot of discussion about this matter/topics on LinkedIn.com in groups like History & Philosophy ofcience and Quantum Physics. What made me scary and fear to go on discussing was the truth that nobody ine groups really seem to be interested in looking into alternatives or a possbility of something different, but

anging onto the usual explanations (habits), no matter how foolish they may have sound and eventually they

re. Finally I ceased to post further and stopped membership of groups and the LinkedIn itself, because it wasetting a real pain in the a... trying to explain over and over again things that can not be understood (I finallyalized) by such a blindly group of people that put their whole faith into a (self made) thing called science whichey obviously do not really understand themselves at all. Shortly I can say that I've finally gave up on them.

here's really nothing I can do, but feeling pity for all those people who couldn't see any truth, even if it wereaying in front of them. The days when I was trying to convince, are over now and everything that is left isilence. I will remain silent until the day, when everybody opens up their minds to something beyond materialism

nd matter itself. Hopefully a day, not to far and not when it is to late to change the mind. (12:48)
http://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons3.pdfhttp://h3ok.isgreat.org/Phenomenons3.pdf

phenomenons finale

Documents