performance indicators 2005 - university of waterloo · 2013. 10. 22. · ahs arts eng e/s math opt...

Performance Indicators 2005

Fig. 1.1A FTE enrolment -- graduate and undergraduate

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

22,000

24,000

26,000

1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

FTE

stud

ents

GraduateUndergraduate

``

Fig. 1.1B FTE registered students

by Faculty

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

AHS Arts Eng ENV S Math SciFaculty

GraduateUndergrad

Fig. 1.1C Undergraduate FTE % co-op and regular

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002 2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005

RegularCo-op

Fig. 1.1D Undergraduate FTEs by Faculty and co-op/ regular

system of study 2004-05

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

AHS ARTS ENG ENV S MATH SCI Faculty

Co-opRegular

37% co-op

16% co-op

100% co-op

57% co-op

61% co-

25% co-op

Fig. 1.1E

International students as % of total student population by Faculty2004-05

1.1%2.7%

4.4%

2.3%3.4%

9.3%

12.1%

31.0%

10.9%

26.9%

18.4%

33.9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%


UndergraduateGraduate

Fig. 1.2A

Faculty Complement as at 1 September

785

715 715 716736

762 770 759786

816

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Fig. 1.2B Faculty complement by Faculty

0

50

100

150

200

250

AHS Arts Eng E/S Math Opt SciFaculty

September 2002September 2003September 2004

Fig. 1.2C

FTE students taught by Faculty

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

AHS Arts Eng E/S Math Opt SciFaculty

2002-032003-042004-05

Fig. 1.2D

BTUs and FTE students per complement faculty2004/2005

38

43 42 43

50

40

54

45

20

34

16

22

27

13

29

25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

AHS Arts Eng E/S Math Opt Sci UniversityFaculty

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

FTE

stud

ents

per

com

plem

ent f

acul

ty

BTUs 2004/05 FTEs 2004/05

Fig. 1.2E

Full-time student to full-time faculty ratio 2002-03

18.618.920.921.321.421.722.222.524.3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Waterloo C F A D B I G H

Stud

ents

per

facu

lty

G10 Avg = 21.1

Source: G10 Data Exchange; excludes UBC

Fig. 1.2F

Comparison of budget in current dollars and BIU teaching units (BTUs)

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

AHS Arts Eng E/S Math Opt Sci University

$ / B

TU Budget/BTU 2001-02Budget/BTU 2002-03Budget/BTU 2003-04

Source: Table SD9 - Senate Finance Package, 2005

Fig. 1.3A

Entering grade averages (average, basis of admission)full-time undergraduate year one

84

81

90

93

84

89

8383

81

90

93

82

89

8483 84

90

93

83

89

83

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

AHS ARTS ENG SE ES MATH SCI

Sep-01Sep-02Sep-03

Faculty

Fig. 1.3B

Entering grade averages (25th percentile)full-time undergraduate year one

80

76

87

92

78

76

88

92

79 80

88

91

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

AHS ARTS ENG SE

Sep-01Sep-02Sep-03

The 25th Percentile means that 75 percent of students entered

with grade averages higher than the mark indicated.

Faculty

Fig. 1.3C


88

86

9394

88

86

93

95

87 87

9394

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

AHS ARTS ENG SE

Sep-01Sep-02Sep-03

The 75th Percentile means that 25 percent of

students entered with grade averages higher

than the mark indicated.

Faculty

Fig. 1.3D


80

87

7978

87

8078

86

79

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

ES MATH SCI

Sep-01Sep-02Sep-03




Faculty

Fig. 1.3E


88

92

8787

92

8887

92

87

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

ES MATH SCI

Sep-01Sep-02Sep-03




Faculty

Fig. 1.4A

Offer, acceptance and yield rates for full-time undergraduate year one students

Sep 2003 - Total Applications = 3,247Confirmations = 523Registrations = 510

Offers = 1,867

Sep 2001Offer Rate: 68.5%Acceptance Rate: 27.3%Yield Rate: 18.4%Total Applications: 1,618



AHS

Fig. 1.4B


Sep 2003 - Total Applications = 12,212

ARTS

Offers = 7,014

Confirmations = 1,243Registrations = 1,213




Fig. 1.4C



ENG




Offers = 2,061

Confirmations = 869Registrations = 927

Fig. 1.4D



ES




Offers = 1,414

Confirmations = 435Registrations = 423

Fig. 1.4E



MATH




Offers = 3,858


Fig. 1.4F



SCI

Sep 2001Offer Rate: 72.2%Acceptance Rate:23.9%Yield Rate: 16.1%Total Applications: 4,334


Sep 2003Offer Rate: 68%Acceptance Rate: 20.8%Yield Rate: 13.5%Total Applications: 8,051

Offers = 5,472


Fig. 1.5A

Geographic distribution of year one registrants as reported by city of school last attended

September 2003

4.4%

15.0%11.9%

21.2%

44.1%

0.1%

3.3%

Note: KW excludes Baden, Cambridge, and Elmira public schools. Separate school students from these communities are bussed to KW schools and are included in KW figures.

Canada (excl. Ontario)

Ontario (excl. KW, TO, GTA)

Int’l

GTA Unknown

KW

Toronto

Fig. 1.6A

89 140

1265

795

21

228

11

875

519

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Num

ber o

f deg

rees

AH

S B

A

AH

S B

Sc

AR

TS B

A

EN

G B

AS

c

ES

BA

rch

ES

BE

S

MA

TH B

CS

MA

TH B

Mat

h

SC

I BS

c

Faculty and degree

Undergraduate degrees granted2004

Fig. 1.7A Percent of registered students receiving OSAP by Faculty

2003-04

17%

27%

20%

24%

13%

18%

27%

15%

20%

36%

22%

31%

18%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Co-opAHS

Reg Co-opARTS

Reg Co-opENG

Co-opENV S

Reg Co-opMATH

Reg RegOPTOM

Co-opSCI

Reg Co-opSE

Fig. 1.7B

Average OSAP award per participating student by Faculty and system2003-04

6,4006,140

7,250

6,4006,720

7,430

6,390

6,990

7,450

5,770

6,9006,550

6,950

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

Co-opAHS

Reg Co-opARTS

Reg Co-opENG

Co-opENV S

Reg Co-opMATH

Reg RegOPTOM

Co-opSCI

Reg Co-opSE

Ave

rage

OSA

P aw

ard

Fig. 1.8A 2004 NSSE Benchmarks Student-Faculty Interaction

27.622.2

30.721.5

3121.1 39.229.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Year 1 Senior

Waterloo Ontario 7 G10 U.S. Doctoral-Extensive

Students learn firsthand how experts think about and solve practical problems by interacting with faculty members inside and outside the classroom. As a result, their instructors become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous life-long learning.

Source: The National Survey of Student Engagement

Fig. 1.8B

2004 NSSE Benchmarks Supportive Campus Environment

49.159.2 51.958.1 51.256.8 54.459

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Year 1 Students Senior Students


Students perform better and are more satisfied at institutions that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relations among different groups on campus.


Fig. 1.8C

2004 NSSE Benchmarks Enriching Educational Experiences

3727.4 33.625.2 35.125.7 39.326.6

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Year 1 Students Senior Students


Complementary learning opportunities in and out of class augment academic programs. Diversity experiences teach students valuable things about themselves and others. Technology facilitates collaboration between peers and instructors. Internships, community service and senior capstone courses provide opportunities to integrate and apply knowledge.


Fig. 2.1A Graduate FTE enrolment

1,705

1,579 1,5631,605 1,628

1,720

1,877

2,104

2,2522,323

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

FTE

stud

ents

Fig. 2.1B

Graduate FTE enrolment by Faculty

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

AHS ARTS ENG ES MATH SCI Faculty

2002-032003-042004-05

Fig. 2.1C

Graduate student enrolment as percent of total enrolment

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

2002

/200

3

2003

/200

4

2004

/200

5

AHS Arts Eng ENV S Math Sci UW OverallFaculty

% PhD% Masters

Fig. 2.2A

Doctoral Student Supervisions Winter 2005

62120

243

42

188 209

864

273

711

7

175

4825

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

AHS ARTS ENG ES MATH SCI Grand TotalFaculty

co-supervisions

single supervisions

� 1,137 Doctoral Students � 620 Faculty Members with ADDS status (eligible to supervise)� some Faculty co-supervise with 1 or more Faculty members� 816 Full-time Faculty Members � Faculty without ADDs may co-supervise� Faculty Doctoral Student Ratio 1:1.7

Fig. 2.3A

1994 Masters cohort G-10 data exchange universitiesall disciplines - percent graduated or promoted as of Winter 2003

63%

62%

71%

67%

73%

75%

77%

75%

81%

82%

84%

2%

2%

6%

14%

10%

9%

8%

12%

6%

5%

3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

I

H

Total (n=8648)

G

F

E

D

C

B

Waterloo (n=524)

A

Uni

vers

ity

% Completion Rate

% Promoted

Note: 1) n = number of students in the 1994 Masters Cohort.Note: 2) "Still Registered" is not shown in this chart - each University has 1% or fewer Masters students still registered as of Winter 2003.

Percentage graduated

Fig. 2.3B

48%

53%

63%

63%

66%

67%

67%

67%

72%

74%

81% 2%

3%

3%

4%

3%

2%

2%

3%

1%

5%

4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

I

H

D

Total (n=3637)

B

G

A

F

E

C

Waterloo (n=167)

Uni

vers

ity

% Completion Rate

% Still Registered

1994 Doctoral cohort G-10 data exchange universitiesall disciplines - percent graduated or still registered as of winter 2003

Note: n = number of students in the 1994 PhD cohort.

Percentage graduated

Fig. 2.3C

6

6

6

6

6

7

8

8

8

8

8

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

C

A

B

Waterloo (n=429)

D

Total (n=6175)

H

G

I

F

E

Uni

vers

ity

Note: n = number of Masters students graduating.

1994 Masters cohort G-10 data exchange universitiesall disciplines - median number of terms registered to degree for graduates

Number of terms to completion

Fig. 2.3D

14

15

15

16

16

16

16

16

15.5

13.5

13

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Waterloo (n=136)

D

C

H

Total (n=2287)

F

G

I

A

B

E

Uni

vers

ity

Note: n = number of PhD students graduating.

1994 Doctoral cohort G-10 data exchange universitiesall disciplines - median number of terms registered to degree for graduates

Number of terms to completion

Fig. 2.3E

3

4

4

4

4

5

5

5

5

6

6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

D

H

A

Waterloo (n=67)

F

I

C

B

Total (n=1938)

G

E

Uni

vers

ity

Note: n = number of Masters students that have withdrawn.

1994 Masters cohort G-10 data exchange universitiesall disciplines - median number of terms registered for withdrawn students

Number of terms before withdrawal

Fig. 2.3F

4

5

6

6

7

8

8

8

10

10.5

12

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

D

C

Waterloo (n=28)

E

G

H

F

Total (n=1238)

I

A

B

Uni

vers

ity

Note: n = number of PhD students that have withdrawn.

1994 Doctoral cohort G-10 data exchange universitiesall disciplines - median number of terms registered for withdrawn students

Number of terms before withdrawal

Fig. 2.3G

Graduate Degrees 2002-2004 - Average Completion Times by Faculty

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

MA MAcc MAES MArch MASc MBET MEng MES MFA MMath MMSc MSc MTax PhD

Degree Type

AHSARTSENGESMATHSCIGS

Fig. 2.4A

Financial support to masters students 2003-04

External

Scholarships Internal

Scholarships Teaching Assistant

Research Assistant

Other

Total

Average Support

AHS 256,366 140,510 401,024 253,300 101,903 1,153,103 20,991

ARTS 339,078 451,945 833,113 122,479 326,588 2,073,203 15,159

ENG 1,332,744 979,870 979,321 3,488,238 802,794 7,582,966 20,454

ES 336,797 227,521 471,560 181,610 434,879 1,652,366 14,220

MATH 952,354 637,025 1,761,814 1,524,887 241,198 5,117,278 24,516

SCI 577,503 472,848 1,009,097 2,004,565 340,386 4,404,399 23,048

Total 3,794,842 2,909,719 5,455,928 7,575,079 2,247,747 21,983,315

Fig. 2.4B

Financial support to doctoral students

2003-04

External

ScholarshipsInternal

ScholarshipsTeaching Assistant

Research Assistant Other Total

Average Support

AHS 385,099 185,123 205,072 199,897 78,509 1,053,699 28,530

ARTS 910,103 653,752

1,034,925 213,853 239,891 3,052,524 26,644

ENG 2,116,145 1,333,389 896,822

3,114,022 771,446 8,231,824 27,198 ES 108,729 108,267 218,778 120,753 95,980 652,507 21,026

MATH 1,163,148 772,948

1,650,746

1,795,280 251,805 5,633,927 29,973

SCI 822,013 551,965

1,092,276

1,619,515 387,817 4,473,585 26,523

Total 5,505,237 3,605,444

5,098,619

7,063,320

1,825,446

23,098,066

Fig. 2.4C

Average support to graduate students who receive funding2003-04

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000


MastersPhD

Fig. 2.5A

Master's degrees by Faculty and year

0

50

100

150

200

250

MAAHS

MSc MAARTS

MAcc MASc MFA MTax MAScENG

MEng MMSc MArchES

MA MAES MES MBETGS

MMathMATH

MScSCI

Faculty

200220032004

Fig. 2.5B

PhD degrees by Faculty and year

3

18

40

11

14

20

7

27

47

12

25

16

13

17

55

8

23

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

AHS ARTS ENG ES MATH SCIFaculty

200220032004

Fig. 2.6A

Percentage of Master's Student FTEs (Cdn/PR) with External Awards by Faculty and Year

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


2002-032003-042004-05

Fig. 2.6B

Percentage of Doctoral Student FTEs (Cdn/PR) with External Awards by Faculty and Year

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


2002-032003-042004-05

Fig. 3.1A

Research income by Faculty by major category - 2003-04

$0

$5,000,000

$10,000,000

$15,000,000

$20,000,000

$25,000,000

$30,000,000

$35,000,000

$40,000,000


Other incomeContractsGrants

Fig. 3.1B

Research $ per tenured and tenure-track faculty2003/2004

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000


Other income/tenured facultyContracts/tenured facultyGrants/tenured faculty

Note: Faculty counts are taken from the Statistics Canada Full timeAcademic Survey counting all faculty members with Appointment type of Probationary or Tenured.

Fig. 3.2A

Major Granting Council Research Awards 2003/04

$0

$2,000,000

$4,000,000

$6,000,000

$8,000,000

$10,000,000

$12,000,000


CIHRSSHRCNSERC

Fig. 3.2B

Major granting council research awards 2003/04 per tenured and tenure-track faculty

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

$70,000

$80,000

$90,000


CIHR/tenured facultySSHRC/tenured facultyNSERC/tenured faculty

Fig. 3.3A

Ontario government research funding 2003/04

$0

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

$3,000,000

$4,000,000

$5,000,000

$6,000,000

$7,000,000

$8,000,000

$9,000,000

$10,000,000


OTHERORDCFOITPREAOCEs

Fig. 3.3B

Ontario government research funding 2003/04 per tenured and tenure-track faculty

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

$70,000


OTHER/Tenured FacultyORDCF/Tenured FacultyOIT/Tenured FacultyPREA/Tenured FacultyOCEs/Tenured Faculty

Figure 3.4A

Change in allocation of Canada Research Chairs between 2000 and 2005Combined NSERC, SSHRC and CIHR allocations

-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

UBC Alberta Western Waterloo McMaster Toronto Queen's McGill Montreal Laval G-10

Fig. 3.4B Change in allocation of Canada Research Chairs between 2000 and 2005

NSERC allocations

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4


Fig. 3.4C

Change in allocation of Canada Research Chairs between 2000 and 2005SSHRC allocations

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4


Fig. 3.4D

Change in allocation of Canada Research Chairs between 2000 and 2005CIHR allocations

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10


Fig. 3.4E

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

G10 Sept 2000 $

x 000s Sept 2005 $

x 000s Change $

x 000s Change %

McGill $102,577 $189,256 $86,679 84.5%McMaster $31,887 $61,935 $30,048 94.2%Queens $17,084 $32,307 $15,223 89.1%Montreal $63,480 $130,454 $66,974 105.5%Laval $32,077 $66,328 $34,251 106.8%Alberta $50,505 $95,541 $45,036 89.2%UBC $55,024 $127,812 $72,788 132.3%Toronto $146,143 $309,537 $163,394 111.8%Waterloo $888 $4,900 $4,012 451.8%Western $35,666 $67,893 $32,227 90%Total $535,331 $1,085,963 $550,632 102.9% Total/all Institutions $684,738 $1,435,098 $ 750,360 109.6%

Fig. 3.4F Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)

G10 Sept 2000 $

x 000s Sept 2005 $

x 000s Change $

x 000s Change % McGill $70,797 $83,668 $12,871 18.2%McMaster $42,448 $51,854 $9,406 22.2%Queens $42,287 $47,521 $5,234 12.4%Montreal $41,667 $50,760 $9,093 21.8%Laval $55,932 $63,347 $7,415 13.3%Alberta $79,515 $93,668 $14,153 17.8%UBC $105,948 $116,448 $10,500 9.9%Toronto $116,607 $133,895 $17,288 14.8%Waterloo $60,622 $71,867 $11,245 18.5%Western $34,700 $43,553 $8,853 25.5%Total $650,523 $756,581 $ 106,058 16.3% Total/all Institutions $1,156,028 $ 1,379,256 $ 223,228 19.3%

Fig. 3.4G

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)

G10 Sept 2000 $

x 000s Sept 2005 $

x 000s Change $

x 000s Change % McGill $9,619 $16,257 $6,638 69.0%McMaster $5,768 $8,140 $2,372 41.1%Queens $5,076 $8,742 $3,666 72.2%Montreal $12,856 $20,718 $7,862 61.2%Laval $11,955 $16,782 $4,827 40.4%Alberta $9,283 $16,683 $7,400 79.7%UBC $15,750 $23,857 $8,107 51.5%Toronto $22,204 $36,880 $14,676 66.1%Waterloo $2,701 $6,134 $3,433 127.1%Western $5,841 $11,254 $5,413 92.7%Total $101,053 $165,447 $64,394 63.7% Total/all Institutions $185,139 $322,269 $ 137,130 74.1%

Fig. 4.1A

Faculty by rank and gender

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2002Lecturer

2003 2004 2002AssistantProfessor

2003 2004 2002AssociateProfessor

2003 2004 2002Professor

2003 2004

Rank

FemaleMale

Fig. 4.1B

Faculty appointments by Faculty and gender

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004 2002 2003 2004

AHS ARTS ENG ENV S MATH SCI

FemaleMale

Fig. 4.2A

Faculty hires by rank and gender

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2002Lecturer

2003 2004 2002AssistantProfessor

2003 2004 2002AssociateProfessor

2003 2004 2002Professor

2003 2004

Rank

FemaleMale

Fig. 4.2B

Fig. 4.3A

Faculty age distributionApril 2005

1.6%

13.0%12.3%

15.2%

34.1%

23.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

<30 31-39 40-49 50-54 55-59 60+

Age

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Cou

nt

Fig. 5.1A

Academic support staff operating complement

1,552

1,457 1,469 1,473 1,502 1,526 1,546 1,5531,630

1,667

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

FTE

staf

f

Fig. 5.2A

Count of academic support staff by fundApril 2005

248

1,487

120 91

17

69

33 9

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

Ancillary Operating Complement Operating Not in Complement Research

Fund

Part-timeFull-time

Fig. 5.3A

Academic support staff by typeApril 2005

632

157

459

314

420

57

3

31

28

17

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Administrative Managerial Professional Semi skilled and service Technical and SkilledTrades

Type

Part-timeFull-time

Fig. 6.1A

Co-op Employment Summary2004-2005

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

AHS ARTS ENG ENV MATH SCIFaculty

Employed Beginning of TermFinal EmploymentScheduled to Work

Employed beginning of term - 86%, Final employment - 95%, Scheduled to work 11,809

Fig. 6.2A

Total Co-op Earnings2004 - 2005

4.0 5.5

53.4

6.9

34.8

6.1

$-

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

AHS ARTS ENG ES MATH SCI

Mill

ions

Total Earnings $111 Million

Fig. 7.1A

2003-04 Operating revenue by source

$22.3M7.2%

$5.4M1.7%

$131.4M42.3%

$151.6M48.8%

Academic fees

Grants

Sales, services and otherincomeInvestment income

Fig. 7.2A

35.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Wei

ghte

d A

vera

ge A

ge (Y

ears

)

NipissingYork (Keele)W

LU

TrentBrock

Toronto (Miss)

Laur -Algoma

Ottawa

Laur - HearstLaurentianW

aterlooLakeheadCarletonM

cMaster

RyersonToronto (Scar)W

esternW

indsorYork (G

lendon)G

uelphQ

ueen'sToronto (St. G

eorge)

OCAD

University -- in Age Order

Age Profile of Ontario University Space (As at 1 Sep 2004)

Source: COU - Campus in Decline Nov, 2004

Fig. 7.3A

78.2 81.7

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Inve

ntor

y / G

ener

ated

OCAD

NipissingYork (Keele)BrockRyersonTrentW

LU

Western

Toronto (Scar)O

ttawaCarletonLaur - HearstSystemToronto (M

iss)W

aterlooM

cMaster

LakeheadToronto (St. G

eorge)

Windsor

Guelph

Queen's

York (Glendon)

LaurentianLaur -Algom

a

University -- in Ratio Order

Ratio of inventory to formula space (As at 1 Nov 2001)

Source: Table 37 - COU Inventory of Physical Facilities of Ontario Universities 2001-02

Fig. 7.3B

Ratio of actual space to formula space

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

1977-78 1986-87 1995-96 1998-99 2001-02Survey year

Waterloo

All Ontario Universities

Source: Table 37 - COU Inventory of Physical Facilities of Ontario Universities, various years

Fig. 8.1A

Maclean's Statistics on Alumni Donations To be submitted Aug. 2005

# Alumni with Good Addresses (cumulative 5-year total 2000-04)

374,234

# Alumni Donors

(cumulative 5-year total 2000-04)

71,426

% participation

19%

Fig. 8.2A

Annual fundraising (millions $)new donations and cumulative pledges

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

$160

2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Partial year

Fiscal year

Gifts-in-kindFuture pledgesCash

30.9

59.4

74.4

133.4

85.1

Fig. 8.3A

Cumulative campaign results to March 1, 2005

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Partial year

Fiscal year

Cumulative gifts in kindFuture pledgesCumulative cash

30.9M

129.5M

84.4M

210.2M

235.9M

Campaign Goal = $260M by 2007Percent Raised = 90.7%

Fig. 8.4A Campaign by donor constituency (May 2000 to March 1, 2005)

Faculty/staff/retirees $10.4M4%

Friends $26.4M11%

Alumni & honourary grads $81.535%

Students $10.7M5%

Corporations/organizations $92.7M

39%

Foundations $13.3M6%

Faculty/staff/retirees $10.4MFriends $26.4MAlumni & honourary grads $81.5Students $10.7MCorporations/organizations $92.7MFoundations $13.3M

Fig. 8.5A

Campaign by gift designation (May 2000 to March 1, 2005)

ENG $32.7M13.9%

AHS $14.4M6.1%

ARTS $22.8M 9.7%

Athletics $3.4M 1.4%

U-Wide/interdisciplinary $107.4M 45.5%

SCI $14.4M 6.1%

Library $2.6M 1.1%

MATH $13.6M5.8%

University colleges $9.9M 4.2%

ES $14.6M6.2%

ARTS $22.8M

AHS $14.4M

ENG $32.7M

ES $14.6M

MATH $13.6M

SCI $14.4M

Athletics $3.4M

Library $2.6M

U-Wide/interdisciplinary$107.4M University colleges $9.9M

Fig. 9.1A Source: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada

Library expenditures as percentage of university operating expenditures,G10 universities

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

UBC Alberta Western Waterloo McMaster Toronto Queens Laval Montreal McGill

G10 universities

2001-022002-032003-04

Fig. 9.2A Source: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada

Library holdings, total (in millions), G10 universities

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16


G10 universities

2001-022002-032003-04

Fig. 9.2B Source: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada Library holdings per FTE student

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


Hol

ding

s pe

r FTE

stu

dent

2001-022002-032003-04

Fig. 9.2C

Library holdings: print and electronic serial subscriptions

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04

Num

ber o

f ser

ial s

ubsc

riptio

ns

Electronic subscriptions Print subscriptions

Fig. 9.2D

Library holdings: print and electronic monograph titles

1,240,000

1,260,000

1,280,000

1,300,000

1,320,000

1,340,000

1,360,000

1,380,000

1,400,000

1,420,000

1,440,000

1,460,000

2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04

Num

ber o

f titl

es

Electronic monograph titlesPrint monograph titles

Fig. 9.2E LIbrary electronic & print serial subscriptions 2002-03

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Waterloo Queens Montreal McMaster Laval Western McGill Alberta UBC TorontoUniversity

performance indicators 2005 - university of waterloo · 2013. 10. 22. · ahs arts eng e/s math opt...

Documents