peoples and cultures of europe the “four-stage” model of analysis

90
Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Post on 21-Dec-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Peoples and Cultures of Europe

The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Page 2: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“The Four-Stage

Model of Anallysis”

Page 3: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

• we sometimes include Europe in anthropology specifically because we want to test the universality of anthropological models

• Hoffman

• Shutes

Susan Parman, Europe in the Anthropological Imagination, pp. 11 - 14

Page 4: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

the item or action itself

as a

Unit of Analysis

Page 5: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

• on the other hand, going to Europe was essential in the anthropological imagination because it validated the universality of anthropological models– thus separating it from its image as a discipline

relevant only to the study of the exotic, the “primitive,” and the non-West

Susan Parman, Europe in the Anthropological Imagination, pp. 14 - 16

Page 6: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

• on the other hand, going to Europe was essential in the anthropological imagination because it validated the universality of anthropological models– thus separating it from its image as a discipline

relevant only to the study of the exotic, the “primitive,” and the non-West

Susan Parman, Europe in the Anthropological Imagination, pp. 14 - 16

Page 7: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

• according to Mark T. Shutes, this same

motivation lay behind George Peter

Murdock attempting to add more

European material to the Human

Relations Area Files, so as to expand the

scope of ethnographic examples

Susan Parman, Europe in the Anthropological Imagination, pp. 14 - 16

Page 8: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

• according to Mark T. Shutes, this same

motivation lay behind George Peter

Murdock attempting to add more

European material to the Human

Relations Area Files, so as to expand the

scope of ethnographic examples

Susan Parman, Europe in the Anthropological Imagination, pp. 14 - 16

Page 9: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis
Page 10: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

a cultural metaphor(analogy, by means of cultural metaphors)

as a

Unit of Analysis

Page 11: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“units of analysis” may also include:

– a nation (“national character studies”)

– the item or action itself (including “processes”)

– a “cultural metaphor”

(analogy, by means of cultural metaphors)

Page 12: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“units of analysis” may also include:

– a nation (“national character studies”)

– the item or action itself (including “processes”)

– a “cultural metaphor”

(analogy, by means of cultural metaphors)

Page 13: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth1095/index.html#text

Page 14: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Gannon’s

European Cultural Metaphorsinclude

Ch. 6. The Turkish Coffehouse

Ch. 8. The Polish Village Church

Ch. 10. The German Symphony

Ch. 11. The Swedish Stuga

Ch. 12. Irish Conversations

Ch. 14. The Danish Christmas Luncheon

Ch. 15. French Wine . . .

Page 15: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth1095/Ireland.html#title

Page 16: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

http://www.carn.com/IrishTales.htm

Page 18: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• cultural metaphors can be derived for ethnic groups within and across nations

– e.g., Anishinabe (Chippewa; Ojibwa)– e.g., Rom (Gypsies)– e.g., Irish “Travellers”

• sometimes incorrectly called “Gypsies”

– e.g., Kurds (in Turkey)– e.g., Basques

Page 19: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• cultural metaphors can be derived for ethnic groups within and across nations

– e.g., Anishinabe (Chippewa; Ojibwa)– e.g., Rom (Gypsies)– e.g., Irish “Travellers”

• sometimes incorrectly called “Gypsies”

– e.g., Kurds (in Turkey)– e.g., Basques

Page 20: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth3635/cetexts.html#BasqueHistory

Mark KurlanskyThe Basque History of the World.

NY: Penguin Books, 1999.(ISBN: 0140298517)

Page 21: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

A Four-Stage Model of Cross-Cultural Understanding

I. four-cell typology of process / goal orientation

II. more specificity

III. inclusion of other “etic” of culture-general dimensions along which specific cultures have been shown to vary

IV. cultural metaphors are employed for understanding a culture

they build on the “etic” understanding provided by the approaches used in the first three stages

Page 22: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Fig. 1.1. Process, Goals, and Expression of Emotions (p. 12)

Open Expression of Emotions and Feelings

Degree to which process must be emphasized before goals can be discussed

Lower Higher

Lower

Higher

Page 23: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

A Four-Stage Model of Cross-Cultural Understanding

I. four-cell typology of process / goal orientation

II. more specificity

III. inclusion of other “etic” of culture-general dimensions along which specific cultures have been shown to vary

IV. cultural metaphors are employed for understanding a culture

they build on the “etic” understanding provided by the approaches used in the first three stages

Page 24: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

A Four-Stage Model of Cross-Cultural Understanding

I. four-cell typology of process / goal orientation

II. more specificity

III. inclusion of other “etic” of culture-general dimensions along which specific cultures have been shown to vary

IV. cultural metaphors are employed for understanding a culture

they build on the “etic” understanding provided by the approaches used in the first three stages

Page 25: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Emics / Etics

emics– from “phonemics”– viewing a culture from the inside

etics– from “phonetics”– viewing a culture from the outside

more on the “emics” and “etics” later

Page 26: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Four-Stage Model”

One variable of Gannon’s

“Four-Stage Model”

is the degree to which process such as

effective communication and getting to

know one another in depth should

precede discussion of specific goals

Page 27: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Four-Stage Model”

One variable of Gannon’s

“Four-Stage Model”

is the degree to which process such as

effective communication and getting to

know one another in depth should

precede discussion of specific goals

Page 28: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Four-Stage Model”

Another variable of Gannon’s

“Four-Stage Model” is the degree to which a

culture fosters and encourages open

emotional expression

Page 29: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Four-Stage Model”

Another variable of Gannon’s

“Four-Stage Model” is the degree to

which a culture fosters and encourages

open emotional expression

Page 30: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Fig. 1.1. Process, Goals, and Expression of Emotions (p. 12)

Open Expression of Emotions and Feelings

Degree to which process must be emphasized before goals can be discussed

Lower Higher

Lower England, Ireland, and Scotland

United States and Germany

Higher China, Japan, and India

Mexico, Spain, and Italy

Page 31: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

“Metaphors

are not stereotypes” – Martin J. Gannon

Why?

Page 32: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Geert Hofstede(1991)

• IBM study demonstrated that

national culture explained 50% of

the differences in attitudes in IBM’s

53 countries

Page 33: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Given such studies, it seems that

culture influences between 25%

and 50% of our attitudes, whereas

other aspects of workforce

diversity, such as social class,

ethnicity, race, sex, and age,

account for the remainder of these

attitudinal differences.”

Page 34: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Given such studies, it seems that

culture influences between 25%

and 50% of our attitudes, whereas

other aspects of workforce

diversity, such as social class,

ethnicity, race, sex, and age,

account for the remainder of these

attitudinal differences.”

Page 35: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Frequently, when a foreigner

violates a key cultural value, he or

she is not even aware of the

violation, and no one brings the

matter to his or her attention.”

– once a visitor makes a major mistake it is frequently impossible to rectify it

– and it may well take several months to realize that polite rejections really signify isolation and banishment

Page 36: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Frequently, when a foreigner

violates a key cultural value, he or

she is not even aware of the

violation, and no one brings the

matter to his or her attention.”

– once a visitor makes a major mistake it is frequently impossible to rectify it

– and it may well take several months to realize that polite rejections really signify isolation and banishment

includingproxemicskenisics

Page 37: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Frequently, when a foreigner

violates a key cultural value, he or

she is not even aware of the

violation, and no one brings the

matter to his or her attention.”

– once a visitor makes a major mistake it is frequently impossible to rectify it

– and it may well take several months to realize that polite rejections really signify isolation and banishment

Page 38: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Even genuinely

small cultural mistakes can have

enormous consequences.”

Page 39: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“. . . knowing a country’s language,

although clearly helpful, is no

guarantee of understanding its

cultural mindset, and some of the

most difficult problems have been

created by individuals who have a

high level of fluency but a low level of

cultural understanding.”

Page 40: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“. . . knowing a country’s language,

although clearly helpful, is no

guarantee of understanding its

cultural mindset, and some of the

most difficult problems have been

created by individuals who have a

high level of fluency but a low level of

cultural understanding.”

Page 41: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

“Moreover,

members of a culture tend to assume

that highly fluent visitors know the

customs and rules of behavior, and

these visitors are judged severely

when violations occur.”

Page 42: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• Understanding Global Cultures

describes a method for understanding

easily and quickly the cultural mind-

set of a nation and comparing it to

other nations . . .

Page 43: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• Understanding Global Cultures

describes a method for understanding

easily and quickly the cultural mind-

set of a nation and comparing it to

other nations . . .

metaphorical analysis

Page 44: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

wherein

the unit of analysis isthe metaphor

Page 45: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

A Four-Stage Model of Cross-Cultural Understanding

I. four-cell typology of process / goal orientation

II. more specificity

III. inclusion of other “etic” of culture-general dimensions along which specific cultures have been shown to vary

IV. cultural metaphors are employed for understanding a culture

they build on the “etic” understanding provided by the approaches used in the first three stages

Page 46: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• In essence the cultural metaphor involves identifying some phenomenon, activity, or institution of a nation’s culture that all or most of its members consider to be very important and with which they identify closely– the characteristics of the metaphor then

become the basis for describing and understanding the essential features of the society

Page 47: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• In essence the cultural metaphor involves identifying some phenomenon, activity, or institution of a nation’s culture that all or most of its members consider to be very important and with which they identify closely– the characteristics of the metaphor then

become the basis for describing and understanding the essential features of the society

Page 48: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• In essence the cultural metaphor involves identifying some phenomenon, activity, or institution of a nation’s culture that all or most of its members consider to be very important and with which they identify closely– the characteristics of the metaphor then

become the basis for describing and understanding the essential features of the society

Page 49: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• each metaphor is a guide or map that helps the foreigner understand quickly what members of a society consider very important

– but it is only a starting point against which we can compare our own experiences and through which we can start to understand the seeming contradictions pervasive in most, if not all, societies

Page 50: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• each metaphor is a guide or map that helps the foreigner understand quickly what members of a society consider very important

– but it is only a starting point against which we can compare our own experiences and through which we can start to understand the seeming contradictions pervasive in most, if not all, societies

Page 51: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Cultural Metaphors

• Gannon’s book describes

a dominant,

and perhaps the dominant,

metaphor for each society

– but other metaphors may also be

suitable

Page 52: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Gannon’s

European Cultural Metaphorsinclude

Ch. 6. The Turkish Coffehouse

Ch. 8. The Polish Village Church

Ch. 10. The German Symphony

Ch. 11. The Swedish Stuga

Ch. 12. Irish Conversations

Ch. 14. The Danish Christmas Luncheon

Ch. 15. French Wine . . .

Page 53: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Gannon’s

European Cultural Metaphorsinclude

Ch. 17. The Traditional British House

Ch. 21. The Italian Opera

Ch. 22.  Belgian Lace

Ch. 24. The Russian Ballet

Ch. 25. The Spanish Bullfight

Ch. 26. The Portuguese Bullfight

Page 54: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

• Edward T. Hall

• Geert Hofstede

• Cultural Metaphors include, in addition, the items on p. 11 of Gannon’s book . . .

Page 55: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

• Edward T. Hall

• Geert Hofstede

• Cultural Metaphors include, in addition, the items on p. 11 of Gannon’s book . . .

Page 56: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

– note that each society has a dominant

cultural orientation that can be

described in terms of six dimensions

Page 57: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

1. “What do members of a society assume about the nature of people, that is, are people good, bad, or a mixture?”

• These kinds of beliefs are sometimes called

“existential postulates”

Page 58: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

1. “What do members of a society assume about the nature of people, that is, are people good, bad, or a mixture?”

• These kinds of beliefs are sometimes called

“existential postulates”

Page 59: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

2. “What do members of a society assume

about the relationship between a person

and nature, that is, should we live in

harmony with it or subjugate it?”

• These kinds of beliefs are sometimes called

“normative postulates”

Page 60: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

2. “What do members of a society assume

about the relationship between a person

and nature, that is, should we live in

harmony with it or subjugate it?”

• These kinds of beliefs are sometimes called

“normative postulates”

Page 61: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

3. “What do members of a society assume

about the relationship between people,

that is, should a person act in an

individual manner or consider the group

before taking action?”

• individualism vs. collectivism (groupism) in

terms of such issues as making decisions,

conformity, and so forth

Page 62: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

3. “What do members of a society assume

about the relationship between people,

that is, should a person act in an

individual manner or consider the group

before taking action?”

• individualism vs. collectivism (groupism) in

terms of such issues as making decisions,

conformity, and so forth

Page 63: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

4. “What is the primary mode of activity in

a given society, that is, being, or

accepting the status quo, enjoying the

current situation, and going with the

flow of things;

or doing, that is, changing things to

make them better, setting specific

goals and accomplishing them within

specific schedules, and so forth?”

Page 64: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

4. “What is the primary mode of activity in

a given society, that is, being, or

accepting the status quo, enjoying the

current situation, and going with the

flow of things;

or doing, that is, changing things to

make them better, setting specific

goals and accomplishing them within

specific schedules, and so forth?”

Page 65: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

5. “What is the conception of space in a given society,

that is, is it considered private, in that meetings

are held in private, people do not get too close to

one another physically, and so on;

or public, that is, having everyone participate in

meetings and decision making, allowing

emotions to be expressed publicly, and having

people stand in close proximity to one another?”

Page 66: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

5. “What is the conception of space in a given society,

that is, is it considered private, in that meetings

are held in private, people do not get too close to

one another physically, and so on;

or public, that is, having everyone participate in

meetings and decision making, allowing

emotions to be expressed publicly, and having

people stand in close proximity to one another?”

Page 67: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

6. “What is the society’s dominant

temporal orientation”

past

present

and / or future?

Page 68: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

6. “What is the society’s dominant

temporal orientation”

past

present

and / or future?

Page 69: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Kluckholn and Strodtbeck note that each society has a dominant cultural orientation that can be described in terms of these six dimensions

• but that other, weaker orientations may also exist simultaneously in its different geographical regions and racial and ethnic groups

Page 70: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Kluckholn and Strodtbeck note that each society has a dominant cultural orientation that can be described in terms of these six dimensions

• but that other, weaker orientations may also exist simultaneously in its different geographical regions and racial and ethnic groups

Page 71: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Kluckholn and Strodtbeck note that each society has a dominant cultural orientation that can be described in terms of these six dimensions

• but that other, weaker orientations may also exist simultaneously in its different geographical regions and racial and ethnic groups

Page 72: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

• Edward T. Hall

• Geert Hofstede

Page 73: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

• Edward T. Hall

• Geert Hofstede• made many discoveries in how

people learn language

• analyzed the levels of learning

Page 74: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Edward T. Hall

1. “Context,

or the amount of information that must

be explicitly stated if a message or

communication is to be successful”

Page 75: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Edward T. Hall

2. “Space,

or the ways of communicating through

specific handling of personal space”

e.g., North Americans tend to keep more

space between them while communicating

than do South Americans

Page 76: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Edward T. Hall

3. Time, which is either

monochronic

(scheduling and completing one activity at a time)

or polychronic(not distinguishing between activities and completing them simultaneously – “multitasking”)

Page 77: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Edward T. Hall

3. Time, which is either

monochronic

(scheduling and completing one activity at a time)

or polychronic(not distinguishing between activities and completing them simultaneously – “multitasking”)

Page 78: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Edward T. Hall

4. “Information flow,

which is the structure and speed of

messages between individuals and / or

organizations”

Page 79: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

• Edward T. Hall

• Geert Hofstede

Page 80: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Geert Hofstede

– prominent organizational psychologist

– research is based on a large questionnaire survey of IBM employees and managers working in 53 different countries

– especially significant because the type of organization is held constant

Page 81: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Geert Hofstede

1. Power distance

or the degree to which members of a

society automatically accept a

hierarchical or unequal distribution of

power in organizations and the society

Page 82: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Geert Hofstede

2. Uncertainty avoidance

or the degree to which members of a

given society deal with the uncertainty

and risk of everyday life and prefer to

work with long-term acquaintances and

friends rather than with strangers

Page 83: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Geert Hofstede

3. Individualism

or the degree to which an individual perceives him- or her-self to be separate from a group and free from group pressure to conform

Page 84: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Geert Hofstede

4. Masculinity

or the degree to which a society looks

favorably on aggressive and materialistic

behavior

Page 85: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Geert Hofstede

5. Time horizon(short term to long term)

or the degree to which members of a

culture are willing to defer present

gratification in order to achieve long-

term goals

Page 86: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Geert Hofstede

5. Time horizon(short term to long term)

or the degree to which members of a

culture are willing to defer present

gratification in order to achieve long-

term goals

Page 87: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

criticisms of the “three-dimensional approaches” developed by

Kluckholn and Strodtbeck, Hall, and Hofstende include

– leave out many features of the cultural mind-sets that are activated in daily cultural activities

– neglect the institutions molding these mind-sets

– are instructive, but are “somewhat lifeless and narrow”

– leave out many facets of behavior

Page 88: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

Constructing Cultural Metaphors

• Florence Kluckholn and Fred Strodtbeck

• Edward T. Hall

• Geert Hofstede

• Cultural Metaphors include, in addition, the items on p. 11 of Gannon’s book . . .

Page 89: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth1095/index.html#text

Page 90: Peoples and Cultures of Europe The “Four-Stage” Model of Analysis

A Four-Stage Model of Cross-Cultural Understanding

I. four-cell typology of process / goal orientation

II. more specificity

III. inclusion of other “etic” of culture-general dimensions along which specific cultures have been shown to vary

IV. cultural metaphors are employed for understanding a culture

they build on the “etic” understanding provided by the approaches used in the first three stages