pdf_id=1mkwrnlfvgxpsqusrgknsh1chcenseeostv1aesabnwu&pageid=p15&attachment=false

36
DUCTILITY AND PREVENTION OF STRUCTURAL FAILURE

Upload: s-m-tahmidur-rahman

Post on 13-Sep-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

design

TRANSCRIPT

  • DUCTILITY AND PREVENTION

    OF STRUCTURAL FAILURE

  • TOPICSTypes of LoadingStructural Distress under Various Loading ConditionsDuctility Provisions and Structural Repair/RetrofitRelevant Research at UAPConclusions

  • Types of Loading

  • Structural Distress under Various Loading Conditions

    Quasi-Static LoadsMachine VibrationImpact LoadsBlast LoadingCyclonic Storm Loading

  • Vertical Loads

    Overload from service requirement and careless use

    Poor construction practices and material quality

    Quasi-Static Loads

    Cracks in Beams and Columns

    Ultimate Collapse of Structure

  • Support Settlement

    Overloaded super-structure and sub-structureFilling up lands, ponds, with soft infillNo/inaccurate soil test and no soil improvement

    (a) Building before support settlement, (b) Uniform settlement, (c) Differential settlement

  • Cracks indicating Differential Support Settlement

  • Extreme Temperature (Fire)

    Fig. 7(a): The effect of fire flame on the compressive strength at 1-hour of exposureEffect of temperature on

    (a) Steel yield strength, (b) Concrete compressive strength

    Steel melts as in September 11, 2001Dehydration of paste in the concrete matrix

  • Impact LoadsProgressive Failure of Slabs

    Progressive Failure of slabs in (a) USA, (b) Bangladesh

    Sudden drop of top slab causes a large impact loadCreates a series of slab failures heaped like a pack

    of cards (called a pancake failure)

  • Vehicular Impact on Bridge Railings

    Railing crash involving (a) smaller vehicle, (b) larger vehicle

  • Vehicular Impact on Bridge Railings

    Arrangements for vehicular-impact test of RC railings

  • Machine Vibration Machines and Power Generators Careless Placement and Design May cause Resonance and Fatigue

    Fig. 11: Dynamic amplification of machine vibration

    Dynamic Amplification of Machine Vibration

  • One blast can change historyExtremist views and access to explosivesVery sudden and very high pressure

    Blast Loading

    September 11, 2001

    1 kg

    10 kg 100 kg

    10000 kg

    1000 kg500 kg

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Distance R (m)

    Distance R (m)

    Fig. 14: Variation of blast pressure with distance, for explosives of different weightsVariation of Blast Pressure with Distance

    Nature of Blast Loading

  • Controlled Demolition

    Controlled Demolition

    Ever-changing urban infrastructure in this countryPredicament in the demolition of a single building

  • Cyclones in BangladeshHydraulic Loading

    Date Year Max. Wind Speed(Kmph)) Storm Surge Ht. (m) Deaths09 Oct 1960 162 3 3,00030 Oct 1960 210 4.5~6 5,14909 May 1961 146 2.5~3 11,46628 May 1963 203 4~5 11,52011 May 1965 162 4 19,27912 Nov 1970 223 6~10 5,00,00025 May 1985 154 3~5 11,06929 April 1991 225 6~8 1,38,00015 Nov 2007 240 5~6 3,40625 May 2009 120 2~3 330

  • Loads due to Surge (BNBC, 1993)

    Coastal RegionSurge Height at Sea Coast, hT (m)

    T = 50-year T = 100-year

    Teknaf to Cox's Bazar 4.5 5.8

    Chakaria to Anwara, Maheshkhali-Kutubdia Islands 7.1 8.6

    Chittagong to Noakhali 7.9 9.6

    Sandwip, Hatiya and all islands in this region 7.9 9.6

    Bhola to Barguna 6.2 7.7

    Sarankhola to Shyamnagar 5.3 6.4

  • Ductility Provisions and Structural Repair/Retrofit

    Ductility Provisions in Structural Design

    Methods of Structural Retrofitting

  • Ductility Provisions in Structural DesignProvisions for Quasi-Static Load

    Steel yielding preferred to Concrete crushingBalanced Steel Ratio (b), Maximum (max)

    and Minimum Steel Ratio (min)Column Ties and Spirals, latter is more ductile

    Behavior of tied and spirally reinforced columns (Nilson)

  • Provisions for Impact Load

    Fig. 18: Arrangements of free fall tests on concrete slabs without and with a gravel cushion

    Arrangements of free fall tests on concrete slabs

  • Provisions for Machine Vibration

    Fig. 19: Machines supported on shock-absorbing springs

  • Provisions for Cyclone Load

    Coastal forest and vegetation (a) diminished tsunami wave height, (b) prevented destruction of houses at West Java

  • Blast Resistant Design

    Pair of Links

    Pair of Links

    (a) Beam-Column connection details (b) CFRP wrapped Column

    Blast Resistant Planning

  • Methods of Structural Retrofitting

    Jacketing and Confinement

    Steel jacketed columns (a) circular, (b) rectangular with elliptical jacket

  • FRP jacketed (a) Circular Columns, (b) Square Columns

    Jacketing and Confinement with transverse ties

  • Global Strategies- Adding shear wall, infill wall, wing wall- Adding bracing- Wall thickening- Mass reduction (using lighter

    materials)- Supplemental damping (TMD, TLD)- Base Isolation (shock absorber)

    Local Strategies- Jacketing of Beams, Columns, Joints- Strengthening of individual footings

    Seismic Retrofitting

    Makes stiffer

    Makes stronger

  • Jacketing of Columns

    Retrofitting Beam-Column Frames

  • Relevant Research at UAP

    Numerical Study on Design of Blast Resistant Buildings

    Dynamic Response of Coastal Structures to Ocean Wave Loading

    Dynamic Response of RC Railing to Vehicular Impact

    Transverse/Compression Reinforcement in RC Beams

  • Numerical Study on Design of Blast Resistant Buildings

    Response to Blast Load for Ru/Fm = 0.10~2.0 and Damping Ratio (a) 0%, (b) 5%

    (a) Damped SDOF system with elastic fully-plastic k, (b) Blast Loading

    k c

    m y(t), F(t)

    y

    R

    k

    ye ym

    t

    F(t)

    Fm

    td

  • Column k (k/ft) ye (ft) yu (ft) Ru (k) m (k-s2/ft) Tn (s) yu/ye

    6-00N 1.44E+03 1.06E-02 0.43 15.2 29.35 0.90 40.3

    6-00M 1.27E+03 9.45E-03 3.83 12.0 29.35 0.96 406

    6-100 1.33E+03 1.30E-02 6.14 17.3 29.35 0.93 472

    6-1000 1.11E+03 1.69E-02 6.14 18.7 29.35 1.02 364

    W (kg) td/Tn6-Storied

    R = 3m R = 10m R = 30m

    1000.0125 356 0.68 0.0160.0250 847 1.55 0.0330.0500 1859 4.57 0.069

    10000.0125 5242 51 0.1940.0250 11423 142 0.4160.0500 23818 347 0.857

    100000.0125 55190 1246 6.910.0250 118559 2802 22.970.0500 245327 5943 65.90

    Ductility Demand (ym/ye) for Different Loading Conditions

    Ductility Ratio (yu/ye) for 6-Storied Building

  • Dynamic Response of Coastal Structures to Ocean Wave Loading

    (a) Moment-Curvature Relationship, (b) Curvature vs. Time for GF column of 6-Storied Building for 50-Year Storm

    W

    WC

    WCW

  • Dynamic Response of RC Railing to Vehicular Impact

    2-19mm

    290mm

    200mm

    3-19mm

    150mm

    190mm

    2-19mm 2-19mm

    Moment-curvature relationship of Railing and Rail Post for different strain rates

    Cross-sections of Railing and Rail Post

  • ult Ref of various Posts Damping Ratio Weight (ton) Velocity (kmph), Angle()

    Top Middle Side 4% 2% 4 1 100, 90 50, 30

    250 330 168 187 377 390 413 244 517 193

    Maximum Deflections (mm) from Parametric Studies

    Dynamic Response showing effect of (a) Vehicular Weight, (b) Velocity and Angle

  • Experimental Work on Column Retrofit

  • Careful assessment of structural loads, and better construction practice necessary Member jacketing and confinementProper assessment of soil properties necessary from accurate soil testing

    Soil strengthening measures

    Member detailing measures and shock-absorbing devices can be used to improve structural performance to Impact loads

    Conclusions

  • Machine Vibrations should either be transferred to rigid sub-structure or supported on flexible spring/damper

    Large stand-off distance, shock absorbers and member ductility necessary for Blast Resistant Design

    Measures to resist cyclonic storms (combination of wave, current and wind forces) include protective vegetation and member ductility

  • THANK YOU