pathogen inactivation kabb annual meeting 2017 · •name the possible advantages and disadvantages...
TRANSCRIPT
Pathogen Reduction/Inactivation KABB Annual Meeting 2017
Elpidio Pena, MD, MA
Norton Healthcare
Transfusion Services
Goals
• Discuss the approved methods for pathogen reduction/inactivation of blood products
• Name the possible advantages and disadvantages of blood products pathogen reduction/inactivation
• Discuss the practical implications of these technologies for the transfusion services
Blood Products Are Safe
• USA:
– Collect 13 millions units of RBCs a year
– Transfuse 2.2 millions of platelets a year
• The rate of adverse events is relatively low
• Still morbidity and mortality associated with transfusions
Infectious Diseases Risks
• Residual risk *:
– HIV: 1:1,467,000
– HCV: 1:1,149,000
– HBV: 1:280,000
• New pathogens
• *Zou et al, Transfusion 2010;50 1487-94
Bacterial Contamination of Platelets
• It is estimated that 1/1000-1/3000 platelets are contaminated with bacteria.
• FDA transfusion-associate fatalities report 2015:
– Five fatalities associated with bacterial contamination:
• 3 definite/2 possible
Pathogen Reduction
• 1980’s
– HIV, hepatitis viruses transmitted from human derived coagulation factor concentrates
– Heating the concentrates and other technologies
– Why not do the same for blood products?...
The Safety of the Blood Supply
— Time to Raise the Bar Edward L. Snyder, M.D., Susan L. Stramer, Ph.D., and Richard J. Benjamin,
M.D., Ph.D.
n engl j med 372;20 may 14, 2015
Justifications for Pathogen Reduction Technologies
• Existing and emerging pathogens including viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and prions continue to threaten the safety of the blood supply
• Reactive approach to new infectious agents
• Possible changes in donors selection/elegibility
• Bacterial contamination of platelets
• FDA approved technologies that are safe and effective
The Current Reactive Safety Approach Requires
Continual Addition of Costly New Tests
HIV-1
Ab
HBc,
ALT HTLV-I
HCV 1.0 HIV-1/2,
HCV 2.0
HIV-1 p24
Widespread
Leukoreduction
HIV-1/HCV
NAT
Chagas’
Test WNV NAT
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
$100
$150
$200
$250
Introduction of PI could
stop and even reverse
the cycle of additions
25 years of testing, partial protection
against just 7 agents: HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, HTLV,
leukocytes, West Nile virus,
Chagas’ disease
Average RBC Unit Charge (US) *
Babesia?
Chikungunya?
Others? Dengue?
* RBC price data adapted from B Custer & JS Hoch, Transfusion Medicine Reviews, Vol 23, No 1 (January), 2009: pp 1-12
“…pathogens continue to emerge, and each incident calls transfusion safety into question. Potential threats include, but are not limited to, Ebola, dengue, chikungunya, hepatitis E, pandemic influenza, and SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) viruses”
Justifications for Pathogen Reduction Technologies 2
• Conclusion:
– “We believe the FDA should mandate a proactive approach, ensuring ongoing blood safety by requiring treatment of blood components by approved pathogen-reduction technologies”
Edward Hopper
What Are These Technologies?
Platelets Source Manufacturer
and Technology
Treatment Process
Manner of Inhibiting Replication
Regulatory Status
Individual volunteer donors
Cerus Intercept Blood System
Psoralen (amotosalen) and UVA light exposure
Formation of DNA and RNA monoadducts and crosslinkage
FDA approved; CE marked
Individual volunteer donors
Terumo BCT Mirasol Pathogen Reduction Technology (PRT) System
Riboflavin and ultraviolet light exposure
Direct DNA and RNA damage and guanine modification
Phase 3 study planned in the United States; CE marked
Individual volunteer donors
Macopharma Theraflex ultraviolet platelets
UVC light exposure
Direct DNA and RNA damage and thymine dimer formation
CE marked
INTERCEPT Mechanism of
Action • Small molecules (amotosalen and S-303) penetrate cellular and nuclear membranes
and intercalate into helical regions of DNA or RNA present in pathogens
• Amotosalen forms covalent crosslinks to nucleic acid base pairs upon exposure to
UVA light
• DNA and RNA replication are blocked, inactivating pathogens and leukocytes
16
Nucleic acid
intercalation
Docking Crosslinking Unable to replicate
UVA illumination
or pH reaction Amotosalen
or S-303
Terumo Mirasol System
Plasma Source Manufacturer and
Technology Treatment Process Manner of
Inhibiting Replication
Regulatory Status
Pools of volunteer and paid donors
Octapharma Octaplas Plasma pools treated with solvent, tri-n-butyl phosphate and detergent (octoxynol)
Lipid membrane disruption of enveloped viruses
FDA approved; CE marked
Individual and minipools of volunteer donors
Cerus Intercept Blood System
Psoralen (amotosalen) and UVA light exposure
Formation of DNA and RNA monoadducts and crosslinkage
FDA approved; CE marked
Individual volunteer donors
Macopharma Theraflex MB Plasma System
Filtration, methylene blue treatment and visible light exposure
DNA and RNA damage by type I and type II redox reactions
CE marked
Terumo BCT Mirasol PRT System
Riboflavin and ultraviolet light exposure
Direct DNA and RNA damage and guanine modification
CE marked
Red Cells
Source Manufacturer and Technology
Treatment Process Manner of Inhibiting Replication
Regulatory Status
Individual volunteer donors
Cerus Intercept Blood System
Frangible Anchor-Linker Effector (S303) and glutathione
Formation of DNA and RNA monoadducts and crosslinkage
U.S. phase 2 and European phase 3 studies complete
Copyright © 2015 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. Published by Massachusetts Medical Society. 2
.
The Safety of the Blood Supply - Time to Raise the Bar. Snyder, Edward; Stramer, Susan; Benjamin, Richard New England Journal of Medicine. 372(20):1882-1885, May 14, 2015. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1500154
Pathogen -Reduction Technologies Approved and in Development in the United States and Europe.
The importance of a Broad
Spectrum of Inactivation
HIV-1 HIV-2 HBV HCV HTVL-I HTLV-II
SPIROCHETES Treponema pallidum Borrelia burgdorferi
PROTOZOA Trypanosoma cruzi Plasmodium falciparum Leishmania sp. Babesia microti
LEUKOCYTES T-cells
Bluetongue virus, type 11
Simian Adenovirus-15
Feline calicivirus
Parvovirus B19
Human adenovirus 5
HIV-1
HIV-2
HBV
HCV
HTLV-I
HTLV-II
SPIROCHETES
ROUTINELY TESTED AGENTS
ENVELOPED VIRUSES
Treponema
pallidum
ENVELOPED VIRUSES
Staphylococcus epidermidis Staphylococcus aureus Streptococcus pyogenes Corynebacterium minutissimum Listeria monocytogenes Propionibacterium acnes Bacillus cereus (vegetative) Lactobacillus sp. Bifidobacterium adolescentis Clostridium perfringens
Klebsiella pneumoniae Yersinia enterocolitica Escherichia coli Pseudomonas aeruginosa Salmonella choleraesuis Enterobacter cloacae Serratia marcescens Anaplasma phogocytophilum Orientia tsutsugamushi3
GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
NON-ENVELOPED VIRUSES GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA
(1) Sampson-Johannes A, et al. 2003. Transfusion. 43:83A; (2) Lam S, et al. Transfusion 2007;47:131A;
(3) Rentas F. Transfusion 2004;44:104A.
DHBV BVDV CMV WNV SARS Vaccinia1 Chikungunya Dengue2 Influenza A
Pathogen Reduction Advantages
• Decrease in transfusion reactions
• Mitigation of TA-GVHD / alternative to irradiation
Disadvantages 1
• No pathogen reduction method for RBCs
• Solvent detergent plasma:
– Decreased protein S and plasminogen activation inhibitor type 1 activity
• Platelets:
– Effective
Disadvantages 2
• Cost
Almost Final Thoughts…
• Game changer:
– Donor selection
– Response to new infectious agents
• Blood Management
But being practical…
• Look at your needs
• Listen to your blood supplier
– Expertise