participatory market mapping and urban sanitation market development
DESCRIPTION
Sanitation chain Containment Collection / Emptying Transport Treatment Treatment Reuse / Disposal We’re all familiar with the sanitation chainTRANSCRIPT
Participatory market mapping and urban sanitation market developmentLucy Stevens: Senior Policy Adviser
Sanitation chain
Containment Collection /
EmptyingTransport
Treatment Reuse /
Disposal
Learning from agricultural value chains: what’s different?Agricultural markets have: Large numbers of
poor producers Producers the main
people we want to benefit
Generic steps in the value chain
Well established markets for products
Cow lollipops for better yields in Nepal
The PMSD Roadmapwww.pmsdroadmap.org
A framework to understand market systems & value chains
Containment Collection /
EmptyingTransport
Treatment Reuse /
Disposal
Service Chain
Value Chain for faecal sludge
Sanitation chain: interacting market systemsTo
ilet c
onst
ruct
ion
Valu
e ch
ain
Pay
as y
ou g
oSe
rvice
cha
in
Com
post
/ bi
ogas
Valu
e ch
ain
Value chains for goods
Consumer (eats
apples)Intermediary trader
Producer (grows apples)
Simple value chain for agricultural products
ConsumerHousehold
erArtisan builder
Simple value chain for toilets
Money
Product
People whose
lives we want to improve
People whose lives we want to improve
Value chain for pit-emptying services
Household
Pit emptier Transport Treatmen
tReuse / Disposal
Money
Product
Service
Can we create value for the product?Can we get householders to value ‘public goods’ as part of the service?
Sustainable Public-Private Partnership for Human Waste Value ChainFaridpur, Bangladesh
No National Regulatory
Framework on FSM
Four key problems
30% of individual households connect their pits/tanks to
storm drains
Only 10% of the sludge is safely managed
Emptying services are only used by 55% of HHs and 81% of institutions.Services serve less than 30 % of cases where a containment should be emptied
Unsafe containment of sludge at source
Lack of capacity in collection and
transportation of sludge
Unsafe disposal of sludge
Gaps in national capacity and co-
ordination
Shit-flow diagram, Faridpur
Containment Disposal-ReuseTreatmentTransportEmptying
compostFS FS
Lease: ($L): to cover equipment capital ($EC), TPO shortfall subsidy ($TS), transport cost to be passed back through safe transfer incentive ($STI)
Contract : Capped transfer to TPO
from municipality
Safe transfer incentive
$P1 $P2
Urban CLTS: multiple actions
Demand creation (behaviour change)
Working with artisans Working with pit emptiers Enabling environment (rules &
regs)
Open Defecation Free status in urban areas: CLTS 1,603 facilities newly constructed 601 facilities renovated 58,260 residents benefitting 4 villages close to declaring ODF status 28 pit emptiers legal & work during the
day
LessonsInsights from applying market systems thinking Systemic thinking helped identify key entry points
and new solutions Continuing role for the Municipality and inputs of
municipal money – but how best to deploy this Benefit of working with existing market actors,
and thinking about the incentives which drive them
Practical Action as facilitator, not direct market actor
Challenges: Multiple value and service chains: complexity Change of mind-set and ways of working Many actors are highly vulnerable: need for
expert facilitation
