paolo g. casali, john zalcberg , jaap verweij , axel le cesne ,
DESCRIPTION
LONG-TERM ANALYSIS OF A PHASE III RANDOMIZED, INTERGROUP, INTERNATIONAL TRIAL ASSESSING THE CLINICAL ACTIVITY OF IMATINIB AT TWO DOSE LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS (GIST). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Paolo G. Casali, John Zalcberg, Jaap Verweij, Axel Le Cesne, Peter Reichardt, Jean-Yves Blay, Lars Lindner, Ian R. Judson,
Elena Fumagalli, Pancras Hogendoorn, Agnes Natukunda, Sandrine Marreaud, Saskia Litière, Winette T.A. Van Der Graaf
LONG-TERM ANALYSIS OF A PHASE III RANDOMIZED, INTERGROUP, INTERNATIONAL TRIAL
ASSESSING THE CLINICAL ACTIVITY OF IMATINIBAT TWO DOSE LEVELS
IN PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS (GIST)
Speaker’spotential conflicts of interest
2
Empl Cons Stocks Honor Res Test Other
Amgen Dompé l lARIAD lBayer l lGlaxo SK l lImClone lInfinity lJanssen Cilag l lLilly lMerck SD l lMolmed lNovartis l l l lPfizer l l lPharmaMar l l l lSanofi Aventis l lSchering Plough l
Study design
3
Rimatinib 800 mg /d
imatinib 400 mg /d
946 eligible pts: GIST (CD117+) metastatic and/or unresectable WHO PS = 0-3 previous chemo accepted
progression
February 2001 / February 2002
4
End points
PFS
OS OR TOX
primary
secondary
5
6
7
Long-term update
Database lock on May 27, 2013• Median follow-up: 10.9 years (IQR: 8.1 - 11.3) • Maximum follow up: 11.8 years
7
946 randomized
473: 400mg/day1 did not start treatment
9 ineligible
473: 800mg/day1 did not start treatment
9 ineligible
379 progressed360 died
82 still alive31 lost to follow up
358 progressed339 died
95 still alive39 lost to follow up
8
Treatment
Total(N=946)
A-400mg(N=473)
B-800mg(N=473)
N (%) N (%) N (%)Best overall response
CR 33 (7.0)
32 (6.8)
65 (6.9)
PR 208 (44.0)
239 (50.5)
447 (47.3)
SD 160 (33.8)
138 (29.2)
298 (31.5)
PD 49 (10.4)
40 (8.5)
89 (9.4)
Early death 7 (1.4)
11 (2.3)
18 (1.9)
Un-evaluable
16 (3.4)
13 (2.7)
29 (3.1)
Objective response
9
(years)0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
O N Number of patients at risk : Treatment417 473 206 111 67 42 30405 473 230 110 67 42 29
A-400mgB-800mg
Overall Logrank test: p=0.202
HR 0.91 (95%CL 0.80, 1.05 )
Median PFS:- 400mg 1.7 years (95% CI 1.5, 2.0)- 800mg 2.0 years (95% CI 1.9, 2.3)
Progression-free survival
10
(years)0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
O N Number of patients at risk : Treatment360 473 312 213 146 93 61339 473 326 212 146 96 59
A-400mgB-800mg
Overall Logrank test: p=0.312
HR 0.93(95% CL 0.80, 1.07)
Median OS:- 400mg 3.9 years (95% CI 3.3, 4.4)- 800mg 3.9 years (95% CI 3.4, 4.9
Overall survival
11
12
946 randomized patients
473 at 400mg/day
473 at 800mg/day
61(12.9%) were 10-y survivors62 censored prior to 10 years
350 dead before 10 years
59 (12.5%) were 10-y survivors82 censored prior to 10 years
332 dead before 10 years
10-y survivors (120 pts)
13
946 randomized patients
473 at 400mg/day
473 at 800mg/day
30 (6.3%) were 10-y prog-free26 censored prior to 10 years
415 progressed before 10 years
29 (6.1%) were 10-y prog-free41 censored prior to 10 years
403 progressed before 10 years
10-y progression-free survivors (59 pts)
14
Surgery of residual disease
15
Surgery of residual disease
16
Dose intensity
3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 450%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
800600500400300200100
Time (months)
3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 450%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
800600500400300200100
Time (Months)
400 mg 800 mg
17
10-y survivors
18
10-y progression-free survivors
19
Univariate and multivariate analyses were done using: Cox regression for PFS and OS Logistic regression for RR
For prognostic factor analysis a full model was built and reduced using backward selection method at a 5% significance level
Factors included in the full model were: age PS sex time delay between diagnosis and registration prior surgery prior chemotherapy prior radiotherapy primary site of disease KIT mutation initial tumor load and diameter of longest lesion
Prognostic factor analysis
Reduced model after backward selection
Factor HR 95% CI HR p-valueAge 40-50 vs. <40 yrs. 1.48 1.04 2.09 <.00150-60 vs. <40 yrs. 1.27 0.92 1.77 60-70 vs. <40 yrs. 1.44 1.04 1.99 >70 vs. <40 yrs. 2.66 1.70 4.16 Prior chemotherapy yes vs. no 1.30 1.07 1.60 0.007
Multivariate model
21
Reduced model
Factor OR95% Confidence
Limits
P value
Diameter of longest lesion 0.81 0.78 0.84 <0.0001Initial tumor load 1.08 1.06 1.09 <0.0001KIT mutation
Exon 9 vs. exon11 0.29 0.15 0.57 <0.0001Wild type vs. exon 11 0.38 0.26 0.53Other vs. exon 11 0.40 0.15 1.09
Objective response
22
CovariatesReduced model
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P-Value
Diameter of longest lesion Per 10mm increase
1.08(1.06,1.09) <.0001
Initial tumor load Per 10mm increase
0.99(0.98,0.99) 0.0005
Prior chemo yes vs. No
1.19(1.02,1.39) 0.028 (df=1)
Performance status 1 vs. 0 1.12(0.96, 1.31) 0.048(df=3)
2 vs. 0 1.29(1.00, 1.67)
3 vs. 0 1.54(1.05, 2.26)
Kit mutation exon 9 vs. exon11 1.45 (1.06, 1.99) <.0001(df=3)
Wild type vs. exon 11 1.08(0.91, 1.27)
Other vs. exon 11 2.63(1.65, 4.19)
Progression-free survival
23
CovariatesReduced model
Hazard Ration(95% CI)
P-Value
Age
40-50 vs. <40 yrs.
1.18(0.82,1.70) <.0001 (df=4)
50-60 vs. <40 yrs.
1.41(0.99, 2.01)
60-70 vs. <40 yrs.
1.26 (0.89, 1.78)
>70 vs. <40 yrs.
1.97 (1.38, 2.83)
Performance status 1 vs. 0 1.48(1.25, 1.76) <.0001 (df=3)
2 vs. 0 1.68 (1.28, 2.20)
3 vs. 0 2.27 (1.52, 3.39)
Gender female vs. male
0.83 (0.71, 0.97) 0.023 (df=1)
Prior chemotherapy yes vs. No 1.31 (1.10, 1.55) 0.002 (df=1)
Diameter of largest lesion Per 10mm increase 1.05(1.04, 1.06) <.0001
Kit mutation Exon 9 vs. exon11 1.46 (1.04, 2.06) 0.0002 (df=3)Wild type vs. exon 11 1.18(0.98, 1.41)Other vs. exon 11 2.61 (1.62, 4.22)
Overall survival
24
A large trial in a rare cancer, carried out on a wide inter-group basis at the beginning of the imatinib learning curve
At a median FU of 10 yrs, less than 10% and 15% of pts, respectively, were long-term progression-free and overall survivors
No difference between 400 and 800 mg /d, though the subgroup of exon 9 mutated pts was already shown separately to benefit from the higher dose
Mutational status and initial tumor burden were prognostic factors also on a long follow-up
An even longer follow-up and «high-resolution» assessments needed to characterize long-term progression-free survivors either as a specific subset biologically, or just the expression of stochastic processes leading to secondary resistance
Conclusions
26
Participating institutionsInstitution Country
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori IT
Institut. Gustave Roussy FR
Charite Universitaetmedizin Berlin - Buch DE
Centre Leon Berard FR
Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen Klinikum Grosshadern DE
Royal Marsden Hospital UK
Universitair.Ziekenhuis. Gasthuisberg BE
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois CH
Institut Bergonie FR
Medizinische.Hochschule.Hannover DE
Hospital De La Santa Creu ES
Ashford Cancer Center AU
Instituto Europeo Di Oncologia Milano IT
Universitair.Ziekenhuis.Rotterdam NL
Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni Van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis Amsterdam NL
Maria Sklodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre Warsaw PL
Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia-Institue for Cancer Research and Treatment Candiolo
IT
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Marseille La Timone FR
Christie Manchester UK
Wellington Hospital NZ
Centre Claudius Regaud FR
Prince Of Wales Hospital AU
University College hospital UK
Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre ES
St James'S Leeds UK
Universitaets.Krankenhaus.Eppendorf DE
Peter Maccallum Cancer Institute AU
Centro Di.Riferimento Oncologico Aviano IT
Institution Country
Centre Oscar Lambret FR
Herlev Hospital University Copenhagen DN
Istituto Nazionale Per Lo Studio E La Cura Dei Tumori Napoli IT
National Cancer Center SG
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital AU
Western Infirmary Glasgow UK
Ospedale Gradenigo Torino IT
St George Hospital. AU
University Medical Center Groningen NL
Wesley Clinic AU
Weston Park Hospital Sheffield UK
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. AU
Royal Brisbane Hospital. AU
University Medical Center Leiden NL
Aarhus University.Hospital. DK
Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital AU
Universitair.Ziekenhuis. Antwerpen BE
Hospital Uno,versotarop Central De Asturias ES
Instituto Valenciano De Oncologia ES
Royal Melbourne Hospital AU
The Geelong Hospital AU
Westmead Hospital AU
Flinders Medical Center AU
Launceston Hospital AU
Nottingham University Hospitals UK
Royal Perth Hospital AU
Princess Alexandra Hospital – University of Queensland AU
Royal North Shore Hospital AU