pancheshwar development authority (pda) · 1.8 project features 10 1.9 outline of the report 11...

JUNE 2017

PANCHESHWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PDA)

Consultant:

76-C, Institutional Area, Sector – 18, Gurgaon – 122015, Haryana (INDIA)

Telephone: 0124-2342576, Fax: 0124-2349187 [email protected]

Website: http://www.wapcos.co.in

VOLUME-II : SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

PANCHESHWAR MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Ministry of Water Resources,

River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation

GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL Ministry of Energy

CONTENTS

PANCHESHWAR MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT SIA Study Report

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sub Heading Heading Page No.

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL 1

1.2 THE MAHAKALI TREATY-1996 2

1.3 PANCHESHWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3

1.4 HISTORY OF THE PROJECT 4

1.5 PROJECT LOCATION 7

1.6 MAHAKALI RIVER BASIN 8

1.7 ACCESS 9

1.8 PROJECT FEATURES 10

1.9 OUTLINE OF THE REPORT 11

CHAPTER 2: ASSESSMENT OF PROJECT AFFECTED VILLAGES AND FAMILIES

2.1 METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR ENYMERATION 1

2.2 IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT AFFECTED VILLAGES

1

2.3 ACQUISITION OF PRIVATE LAND 4

2.4 ENUMERATION OF PAFS AFFECTED DUE TO LAND ACQUISITION

8

CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE STATUS-SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS

3.1 GENERAL 1

3.2 DEMOGRAHIC PROFILE OF VILLAGES 1

CHAPTER 4: DATA ANALYSIS OF SURVEYED POPULATION

4.1 GENERAL 1

4.2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES

1

CHAPTER 5: PROPERTY SURVEY

5.1 GENERAL 1

5.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 1

5.3 STUDY APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 1

5.4 FIELD WORK 3

5.5 DATA COMPILATION, ANALYSIS AND REPORTING 3

5.6 LAND REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROJECT AND PROPOSED ACTIVITIES

4

5.7 ASSESSMENT OF LOSS OF PRIVATE PROPERTIES 5

5.8 COMMUNITY PROPERTIES AND ASSETS 10

5.9 GOVERNMENT BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND SPACES

11

5.10 SUMMARY 12

CHAPTER 6: SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

6.1 INTRODUCTION 1

6.2 IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1

6.3 IMPACTS DURING OPERATION PHASE 5

6.4 IMPACTS DUE TO COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT

9

CHAPTER 7: RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN

7.1 INTRODUCTION 1


ii

7.2 RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN 2

7.3 MEASURES FOR RESETTLEMENT 3

7.4 AMENITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURAL FACILITIES TO BE PROVIDED AT RESETTLEMENT AREAS

5

7.5 MEASURES FOR REHABILITATION 11

7.6 COMMUNITY PROPERTIES 21

7.7 BUDGET 23

CHAPTER 8: LIVELIHOOD PLAN FOR PAFS WHO ARE LIKELY TO LOSE ENTIRE LANDS

8.1 INTRODUCTION 1

8.2 LLIVESTOCK REARING 1

8.3 HORTICULTURE 3

8.4 BEE-KEEPING 5

8.5 TRAINING FOR SKILL DEVELOPMENT 5

8.6 TOURISM DEVELOPMENT 6

8.7 WOMEN SELF HELP GROUPS 7

8.8 BUDGET FOR LIVELIHOOD PLAN FOR PAFS 9

CHAPTER 9: LOCAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN

9.1 INTRODUCTION 1

9.2 LOCAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1

9.3 BUDGET FOR LADP 7

CHAPTER 10: MONITORING AND EVALUATION

10.1 INTRODUCTION 1

10.2 INSTITUTIONAL/ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF R&R MEASURES

1

10.3 MONITORING AND EVALUATION 3

10.4 BUDGET 7

CHAPTER 11: COST ESTIMATES

11.1 COST FOR IMPLEMENTING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL ASPECTS

1


iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table-1.1: Composition of Governing Body of PDA 4

Table-2.1: List of affected villages of Pancheshwar MPP 1

Table-2.2: List of affected villages of Rupaligad RDP 4

Table-2.3 Ownership status of land to be acquired for various project

appurtenance on Indian portion

5

Table-2.4 Details of land to be acquired for the project 5

Table-2.5: Details of private land to be acquired in Fully Affected Villages

of Pancheshwar Dam

5

Table-2.6: Details of private land to be acquired in Partially Affected

Villages of Pancheshwar Dam

6

Table-2.7 Details of private land to be acquired in Partially Affected

Villages of Rupalugad Dam

8

Table-2.8 Village-wise list of PAFs losing Land Only, Land & Homestead

and Homestead for Pancheshwar MPP

9

Table-2.9: Village wise list of Affected PAFs for Rupaligad RDP 12

Table-2.10 Summary of PAFs in Pancheshwar MPP and Rupaligad RDP 13

Table-3.1: Demographic Profile of Study Area villages 1

Table-3.2: Caste Profile of the Study Area Villages 7

Table-3.3: Literacy Profile of Study Area Villages 12

Table-3.4: Occupational Profile of Study Area Villages 17

Table-4.1: List of Project Affected Villages 2

Table-4.2: Religious Affiliation of the Project Affected Families 7

Table-4.3: Demographic Profile of the PAFs 11

Table-4.4: Marital status of the Surveyed Population 15

Table-4.5: Village wise details of Migration Pattern of surveyed PAFs 20

Table-4.6: Caste Profile of surveyed Project Affected Families 25

Table-4.7: Educational Profile of the Project Affected Families 29

Table-4.8: Occupational Profile of the Surveyed Project Affected Families 34

Table-4.9: Summary of Occupational Profile of the surveyed Project

Affected Families

43

Table-5.1: List of PAFs losing land, land & homesteads and homesteads

only

4

Table-5.2: Break-up of Land requirement for the Project 4

Table-5.3: Details of the homestead and being affected 5

Table-5.4: List of other properties affected 9

Table-5.5: Details of community property being affected in fully affected

villages

10

Table-5.6 Village wise details of government building, structure and

spaces in the fully affected villages

11

Table-6.1: Impoverishment Risk Assessment 7

Table-7.1: Details of land to be acquired for the project 1

Table-7.2 List of PAFs losing Homesteads & Land and Only Land 2


iv

Table-7.3: Provisions for Resettlement Plan for families losing homestead 3

Table-7.4 Man-power required in the proposed Primary Health Centre 9

Table-7.5 Recommended species for Avenue Plantation in Resettlement

Colony

9

Table-7.6: Summary of amenities and facilities to be provided in

resettlement sites

11

Table-7.7 Entitlement matrix for the Private Land Acquisition 13

Table-7.8: Provisions for Rehabilitation Plan for families losing land 21

Table-7.9 Community Properties affected due to the project 22

Table-7.10 Provision for community properties 22

Table-7.11: Budget for implementation of the Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Plan

23

Table-7.12: Budget earmarked in DPR for Private Land Acquisition 24

Table-8.1: Budget earmarked for livestock development amongst PAFs 2

Table-8.2 Details of horticulture trees and land requirement 3

Table-8.3: Cost of Plantation 3

Table-8.4: Cost for Horticulture Development 4

Table-8.5: Summary of costs for horticulture development 4

Table-8.6: Revenue Generation by Fruit Trees 4

Table-8.7: Maturity Index/Indicators to assess the maturity of Self-Help

Groups

9

Table-8.8: Budget earmarked for implementation of plan for income

generating activities

9

Table-9.1: Break up of cost required for up-gradation of existing primary

schools

2

Table-9.2 List of villages for upgradation of primary schools 2

Table-9.3: Break up of cost required for construction of new primary

schools

3

Table-9.4: Details of scholarships 4

Table-9.5: Budget for up-gradation of PHSCs 5

Table-9.6: Budget for construction of new PHSCs 5

Table-9.7: Budget for construction of community toilets in study area

villages

6

Table-9.8: Cost for up-gradation of Government hospital 7

Table-9.9: Budget for implementation of Local Area Development Plan 7

Table-11.1: Cost for Implementing Social Management Plan 1


v

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure-1.1 Index Map of the Project 8

Figure-3.1 Demographic profile of the Study Area Villages 7

Figure-3.2 Caste profile of the Study Area Villages 11

Figure-3.3 Literacy Profile of the Study Area Villages 16

Figure-3.4 Occupational profile of main workers in Study Area Villages 21

Figure-4.1 Details of the Religious Affiliation of the PAFs 11

Figure-4.2 Marital Status of the Surveyed Population 19

Figure-4.3 Resident and Non-resident surveyed population 23

Figure-4.4 Places of migration 23

Figure-4.5 Reasons for migration among sample population 24

Figure-4.6 Caste Profile of surveyed PAFs 28

Figure-4.7 Source of Drinking Water amongst PAFs 40

Figure-4.8 Distance for Source of Drinking Water 40


vi

ABBREVIATIONS

ANM Auxiliary Nurse Midwife

ASI Archaeological Survey of India

CWC Central Water Commission

CEA Central Electricity Authority

CSMRS Central Soil and Materials Research Station

CWPRS Central Water and Power Research Station

DC District Collector

DM District Magistrate

DPR Detailed Project Report

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan

HMG/N His Majesty's Government of Nepal

GPS Global Positioning System

GSI Geological Survey of India

IDA International Development Agency

IRA Impoverishment Risk Assessment

ITI Industrial Training Institute

JCWR Joint Committee on Water Resources - Joint Group of Experts

JGE Joint Group of Experts

LADP Local Area Development Plan

LHV Lady Health Visitor

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

NGO Non-Governmental Organisation

PAF Project Affected Families

PDA Pancheshwar Development Authority

PDR Project Definition Report

PHC Primary Heath Centre

PHSC Primary Heath Sub-Centre

PMP Pancheshwar Multi-Purpose Project

RMP Rehabilitation Master Plan

R&R Rehabilitation and Resettlement

RoR Right of Records

SDM Sub-District Magistrate

SIA Social Impact Assessment

CHAPTER-1 INTRODUCTION


Chapter 1: Introduction Page 1

CHAPTER-1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL

The Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project (PMP) has been envisaged on the

Mahakali River (known as Sarada in India) where the river forms the

international boundary between India and Nepal, dividing the Far Western

Development Region of Nepal from the Uttrakhand State in India. The main

dam at Pancheshwar is proposed across the Mahakali River, 2.5 km

downstream of the confluence of river Sarju with Mahakali River and, about 70

km upstream of the Tanakpur town (India).

It is a bi-national scheme, primarily aimed at energy production. In addition,

the Project aims to enhance the food grains production in both the countries

by providing additional irrigation resulting from the augmentation of dry

season flows. Due to moderation of flood peaks at reservoir(s), incidental

flood control benefits are also envisaged from the project.

View of Pancheshwar Dam Site



1.2 THE MAHAKALI TREATY-1996

Recognizing that the Mahakali River is a boundary river on major stretches

between the two countries, a treaty (known as the “Mahakali Treaty”) was

signed on February 12, 1996 between His Majesty’s Government of Nepal and

the Government of India concerning the integrated development of the

Mahakali River including Sarada Barrage, Tanakpur Barrage and

Pancheshwar Project. The center-piece of the treaty was “Pancheshwar

Multipurpose Project” which both sides agreed to implement in accordance

with the Detailed Project Report jointly prepared by them.

The main principles enshrined in the Treaty, on which the Pancheshwar

Multipurpose Project is to be designed and implemented, are summarized as

under:

Both Parties have equal entitlement in the utilization of the waters of the

Mahakali River without prejudice to their respective existing

consumptive uses of the waters of the Mahakali River.

Water requirements of Nepal shall be given prime consideration in

utilization of the waters of the Mahakali River. Both the parties shall be

entitled to draw their share of waters of the Mahakali River from the

Tanakpur Barrage and/or other mutually agreed points.

The Project shall be designed to produce the maximum total net

benefit. All benefits accruing to both the Parties with the development

of the Project in the forms of power, irrigation, flood control etc., shall be

assessed.

The P roject shall be implemented as an integrated project including

power stations of equal capacity on each side of the Mahakali River

and the total energy generated shall be shared equally between the

Parties.

Cost of the project shall be borne by the parties in proportion to the

benefits accruing to them. Both the Parties shall jointly endeavour to

mobilize the finance required for the implementation of the Project.

A portion of Nepal’s share of energy shall be sold to India. The

quantum of such energy and its price shall be mutually agreed upon

between the Parties.

Further, in the letters dated 12 February, 1996 exchanged by the two

Governments along with the Mahakali Treaty, the principles for assessment of

project benefits during the preparation of the Detailed Project Report of the

Project are also deliberated as under:

Net power benefit shall be assessed on the basis of, inter alia, saving



in costs to the beneficiaries as compared with the relevant alternatives

available,

Irrigation benefit shall be assessed on the basis of incremental and

additional benefits due to augmentation of river flow, and

Flood control benefit shall be assessed on the basis of the value of

works saved and damaged avoided (to both sides of the river).

Besides the above, Nepal is entitled to draw 1000 cusec of water in

monsoon season and 150 cusec in the dry season from Sarada Barrage

(through its irrigation canal) at Banbasa under Article-1 of the Treaty. This

water drawn from Banbasa barrage provides irrigation to a command area of

11,600 ha; known as Mahakali Irrigation Project (stage-I & II) in Nepal. In

addition, another 1000 cusec of Mahakali water in the wet season and 300

cusec of water in the dry season has been committed under Article-2 of the

Treaty from the Tanakpur Barrage.

Under Article-1 (2) of the Treaty, it was further agreed that India shall maintain

a flow of not less than 10 m3/s (350 cusecs), downstream of the Sarada

Barrage, into the Mahakali River, to maintain and preserve the river eco-

system.

Further, the local communities living along both sides of the Mahakali River

shall be entitled to use of the waters of the Mahakali River, not exceeding five

(5) percent of the average Annual flow at Pancheshwar under Article-7 of the

Treaty.

The Pancheshwar DPR has been prepared keeping the above guiding

principles in consideration and the benefits from the Project which are likely to

be accrued to each Party, are assessed clearly in accordance with the letters

dated 12.02.1996 exchanged by the two Governments along with the Mahakali

Treaty.

1.3 PANCHESHWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Pursuant to the Article-10 of the Mahakali Treaty, it was agreed that, both the

Parties may form project specific joint entity for the development, execution

and operation of new projects including Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project in

the Mahakali River for their mutual benefit. Accordingly, at the 3rd meeting of

the Joint Committee on Water Resources (JCWR) headed by the water

resources secretaries of India and Nepal, held in November 2009, it was

decided to set up the Pancheshwar Development Authority, an independent

autonomous body, to finalize the Pancheshwar Detailed Project Report and



expedite the implementation of the Project.

The Authority was set up in August 2014, having two Co-Chairpersons, one

from each side, and twelve Members (six Members from each side), which

would be working as a Governing Body of the Authority. Among others, the

Ambassadors of Nepal to India and India to Nepal shall be permanent invitees

at the meeting of the Governing Body. The Composition of Governing Body of

Pancheshwar Development Authority (PDA) is given in Table-1.1.

Table-1.1: Composition of Governing Body of PDA

Indian side Nepalese side

1. Secretary , MOWR, GOI Co-Chairman Secretary, MoEn, GON

2. Secretary/ Joint Secretary

(Hydro), MOP

Member Joint Secretary, MoEn

3. Joint Secretary (North), MEA Member Joint Secretary, Ministry of

Foreign Affairs

4. Commissioner (Ganga),

MOWR

Member Director General,

Department of Electricity

Development

5. JS & FA, MOWR Member Joint Secretary, Ministry of

Finance

6. Principal Secretary (Energy),

Govt. of Uttarakhand

Member Director General,

Department of Irrigation

7. Chief Executive Officer/

Additional Chief Executive

Officer, PDA

Member

Secretary/ Joint

Secretary

Chief Executive Officer/

Additional Chief Executive

Officer, PDA

8. Ambassador of India to

Nepal

Special Invitee Ambassador of Nepal to

India

9. Chairman, Central Water

Commission

Special Invitee

10. Principal Advisor (WR),

Planning Commission

Special Invitee Joint Secretary, Water and

Energy Commission

11. Principal Secretary/

Secretary (WR), Govt. of UP

Special Invitee Managing Director, NEA

Source: DPR

1.4 HISTORY OF THE PROJECT

The Pancheshwar dam site was first identified during the hydroelectric survey

of potential sites on the Mahakali River conducted by the erstwhile Central

Water and Power Commission of India in 1956. A storage type development for

power generation was envisaged at that time.



In the year 1962, State Government of Uttar Pradesh carried out preliminary

field investigations with the assistance of the Survey of India and Geological

Survey of India. Based upon the field investigations carried out and data

collected by U.P. Irrigation Department, a project report of the scheme was

prepared by WAPCOS INDIA LIMITED in November 1971. The report

suggested a concrete gravity dam with a crest at an elevation 638 m a s l or a

height from the river bed of about 232 m.

In order to develop the feasibility study of the scheme and to decide about

further investigations to be carried out, a Joint Group of Experts (JGE) of India

and Nepal was constituted in the year 1978. Detailed investigations on Indian

side to formulate the scheme were initiated by Central Water Commission

(India) in July, 1981.

During the 3rd JGE meeting held in April, 1984, it was decided that the

feasibility report would be prepared jointly but the investigations required for the

study be carried out independently by India and Nepal in their respective

territories. The Nepal side appointed consultants with the financial assistance

of the International Development Agency (IDA) to carry out field investigation

works at feasibility level. On the Indian side these investigations were carried

out by Central Water Commission (CWC) with the help of Survey of India,

Geological Survey of India (GSI), Central Electricity Authority (CEA), Central

Soil and Materials Research Station (CSMRS), New Delhi and Central Water

and Power Research Station (CWPRS), Pune.

During 5th meeting of the Joint Group of Experts (JGE) held in March, 1991,

field data collected by both sides were exchanged and data gaps were

identified. It was decided to prepare and finalize a mutually acceptable Project

Definition Report (PDR) to outline the project parameters. Based on the data

collected by both sides, draft Project Definition Report(s) identifying the basic

characteristics of the project, its preliminary benefits and costs was prepared

by both India and Nepal independently and made available to either side for

further discussions.

During the goodwill visit of the Nepalese Prime Minister to India in December

1991, an understanding was reached between the two Countries to prepare a

Joint Detailed Project Report, at Feasibility level.

The 6th meeting of Joint Group of Experts of India and Nepal (JGE) on

Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project was held in February 1992 to discuss the

data gaps in field investigations and modalities for preparation of the Detailed

Project Report. An action plan was drawn and the work of preparation of



Detailed Project Report was assigned by distributing the subject chapters

between the two sides. The additional field investigations that were identified in

the 6th meeting of JGE were completed in December 1993. These field

investigations comprised mainly of topographical surveys, geological

explorations, seismological studies, in-situ rock tests, construction material

surveys, etc. The Indian side completed the assigned chapters and sent to His

Majesty's Government of Nepal (HMG/N) in 1994 for review. Based on the

information contained therein, a draft Detailed Project Report (DPR) was

prepared by HMG/N in 1995 and forwarded to Government of India in July/

August 1996 for their comments. After examination of the draft DPR, three

meetings of Joint Group of Experts followed by two meetings at the level of

Technical officials were held and the contents thereof were discussed to arrive

at a mutually agreed solution.

In the 11th JGE meeting held in March 1999, it was agreed in principle to

establish a Joint Project Office - Pancheshwar Investigation (JOP-PI) at

Kathmandu along with Field Offices, as required, to conduct additional field

investigations for the Re-regulating dam and studies for preparation of Detailed

Project Report jointly. Accordingly, the JPO-PI was established at Kathmandu

in December 1999. The Division office at Tanakpur and three sub-division

offices viz. at Pancheshwar for main dam, at Tamli for Rupaligad site and at

Thuligad for Purnagiri site were established in May 2000. The personnel from

both India and Nepal were deployed to conduct additional field investigations

and studies for preparation of Detailed Project Report jointly.

Due to submergence of Rangun khola valley in Nepal, the Govt. of Nepal did

not agree to locate the re-regulating dam at Purnagiri site and insisted to

construct the regulating dam at Rupaligad only to store the Pancheshwar

powerhouses’ releases during peak hours and release them from Rupaligad

round the clock, to meet the irrigation water requirement downstream. To

resolve the issue pending for last more than ten years, the Indian side agreed

to the Nepalese request to locate the re-regulating dam at Rupaligad site in the

3rd meeting of the Joint Committee on Water Resources (JCWR) held in

November, 2009 at Pokhara (Nepal).



Rupaligad dam site- downstream axis

1.5 PROJECT LOCATION

The Pancheshwar main dam site is proposed about 2.5 km downstream of the

confluence of Sarju with the Mahakali River, a primary tributary of the

Mahakali from India. Here, the Mahakali river flows in a narrow V -shaped

gorge, flanked by 45 degree slopes rising more than 1,000 m above the river

bed. A re-regulating dam is proposed downstream of main dam to even out

peaking out flows from Pancheshwar power houses for meeting irrigation water

requirement and to exploit hydro potential of the basin below Pancheshwar. For

this purpose, two alternative locations were identified; one at Rupaligad, 25 Km

downstream of main dam and other at Purnagiri, 61 Km downstream main

dam. Finally, the Rupaligad site has been selected for re-regulating dam.



An Index Map showing location of main dam and re-regulating dam is

presented in the Figure-1.1.

Figure-1.1: Index Map of the Project

The project structures, including the reservoir area, lie in Champawat,

Pithoragarh, Bageshwar and Almora districts of Uttaranchal state in India and

in Baitadi and Dharchula districts of Far Western Development Region in

Nepal. The entire area directly covered by the project structures and the

proposed reservoir is located between 29°25'0" and 29°47'30" latitude N and

79°55'0" and 80°35'0" longitude E.

1.6 MAHAKALI RIVER BASIN

The Mahakali River originates from the Lipulekh glacier at an elevation of about

7,820 m in the Himalayas. The river flows steeply through a complex sequence



of sedimentary and metamorphic rocks of the High and Inner Himalayan

physiographic provinces and then passes through the Lower Himalayan

province (Mahabharat and Siwalik ranges) before emerging onto the Gangetic

plain in the Terai region.

The Mahakali (Sarada) basin up to the Pancheshwar dam site has a total

catchment area of 12,276 km2, located between 29°20'30" and 30°35'30"

latitude N and 79°20'30" and 81°9'45" longitude E. Out of the total catchment,

an area of 9,720 km2 of the river catchment lies in India, and 4,456 km2 in

Nepal.

During its course, the river carries the flows from several major tributaries

including the Dhauli Ganga (catchment 1357 km2), Gori Ganga (catchment

2300 km2) and Sarju (catchment 4019 km2) from India and the Chamaliya

(catchment:1572 km2) from Nepal. Other minor tributaries joining the Mahakali

River below Pancheshwar dam site are Lohawati & Ladhiya Rivers from India

and Surnayagad, Rupaligad, Sirsegad & Ragun Khola from Nepal before the

river emerges onto the Gangetic plains below the Purnagiri temple near

Tanakpur town. The total drainage area up to Purnagiri temple has been

worked out to be around 14,922 sq km, out of which 10,884 sq km area lies in

India and 4,038 sq km area in Nepal.

The upper reaches of the Mahakali River and of its various tributaries are

characterized by very steep drops. For instance in the first 100 km reach, the

river drops over 4900 m. In its middle and lower reaches it flows through

relatively gentle gradients providing favorable terrain for storage projects.

1.7 ACCESS

At present, the only access by road to the project area is through India. The all

weather 40 km long road from Lohaghat to the Mahakali River at Pancheshwar

was constructed by the State Public Works Department in 1971 to facilitate the

field investigations of the dam project taken up by the Indian side.

It is proposed to use the existing Tanakpur – Lohaghat - Pancheshwar road

(about 130 km) as the main access through India, for the pre- construction

activities of the project. The last portion of this road, approaching the actual

dam site that would eventually be submerged by the reservoir would be

suitably relocated according to the requirement of the permanent project

structures and of the construction planning.

At present, access to the site from Nepal is possible only by helicopter or by a



two-day, 60 km trek from the Patan village. The only existing vehicular access

to the far western development region of Nepal from the rest of the country is

the East - West Highway. The Dhanghari - Dadeldhura - Patan - Baitadi feeder

road, connects the project area to the East- West highway.

In order to gain access through Nepal for the transportation of construction

equipment, machinery, materials, etc. for the project; and for transport of

generating equipment to the Pancheshwar and Rupaligad Re-regulating dam

sites, a new road from Brahmdev to Pancheshwar along the left bank of

Mahakali River has been envisaged and detailed field investigations including

cost estimates have been undertaken by the Project Authority.

1.8 PROJECT FEATURES

As presently conceived, the project includes the following main structures:

A main rock fill dam at Pancheshwar, 315 m high from the deepest

foundation level, forming about 80 km long reservoir, with a surface area

of 116 km2 and a total gross storage volume of about 11.35 billion m3;

Spillway on the left bank (Nepal side of the river), designed to safely

discharge the estimated maximum river flow;

Two underground powerhouses, one on each bank, having a total

installed capacity of 4800 MW (2400 MW capacity on each bank);

A re-regulating dam downstream at Rupaligad site to even-out main dam

releases to achieve continuous river flow conditions;

Two Underground power houses at re-regulating dam having a total

installed capacity of 120 MW each.

The project will generate a total of 7678 GWh dependable power every

year at main dam complex; that will meet a substantial part of the energy

and peak power demand of the Northern India. The project would also

simultaneously cover the medium and long term energy requirements of

Nepal. In addition, 1438 GWh of dependable power would be generated

annually at Rupaligad dam power stations.

At the same time, the project will regulate the natural river flow, allowing

the year round irrigation of agricultural land in the Kanchanpur District in

Nepal, and meeting the existing and future water requirements of the

Indian irrigation systems. It is expected that an additional irrigation

potential of 1.70 lakh hactare in Nepal and 2.59 lakh hactare in the

Indian side would be created with augmented river flows in the post-

Pancheshwar scenario.



In addition, the project will have an incidental flood mitigation effect, reducing

risk of flooding along the lower course of the Mahakali (Sarada) river, both in

the Nepalese and Indian territories. It is expected to protect low lying areas in

Chandani-Dodhara villages along the west bank of Mahakali River in Nepal.

Further, around 10,000 hactare of area of district Pilibhit and 90,000 hactare in

the district Lakhimpur Kheri in Uttar Pradesh (India) are inundated almost every

five years in the Sarada basin due to floods in a stretch of 60 km of the river

which would get protection from floods of 25 years frequency, in the post-

Pancheshwar scenario.

1.9 OUTLINE OF THE REPORT

The document for the Comprehensive EIA study for the proposed Pancheshwar

Multipurpose project has been presented in three volumes as listed below:

Volume-I: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study Report

Volume-II: Social Impact Assessment Study (SIA) Report

Volume-III: delineates the Environmental Management Plan.

The present document (Volume-II) Social Impact Assessment Study for the

proposed Pancheshwar Multipurpose project and the contents of the document

are organized as follows:

Chapter-1 describes the Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project along with its

history and present proposal.

Chapter-2 gives assessment of Project Affected Families and Project Affected

Villages and methodology adopted for enumeration.

Chapter-3 outlines the Baseline Status of Socio-Economic aspects of the

Project Affected Villages of Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project.

Chapter-4 presents Socio-Economic data analysis of the Surveyed Population

in the Project Affected Villages.

Chapter-5 elucidates the data analysis of the Property Survey of Project

Affected Villages.

Chapter-6 presents the Social Impact Assessment due to proposed

Pancheshwar Multipurpose project.



Chapter-7 presents the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Plan for PAFs due to

the proposed Pancheshwar Multipurpose project.

Chapter-8 outlines the livelihood plan for the Project Affected Families

Chapter-9 outlines the proposed Local Area Development Plan for project area

and its surrounding villages.

Chapter-10 describes the Monitoring and Evaluation aspects for the R&R and

LADP measures.

Chapter-11 elucidates the Cost Estimates for implementation of R&R and

LADP measures along with ESMP.

CHAPTER-2 ASSESSMENT OF PROJECT AFFECTED

VILLAGES AND FAMILIES


Chapter 2: Assessment of Project Affected Villages and Families Page 1

CHAPTER – 2

ASSESSMENT OF PROJECT AFFECTED VILLAGES AND FAMILIES

2.1 METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR ENYMERATION

The purpose of enumeration of affected properties and project affected families,

both secondary as well as primary sources of information was used. A

preliminary list of probable affected villages was prepared using submergence

area maps and Administrative Atlas for Uttarakhand, which was subsequently

verified and updated with the help of revenue officials. The khasra maps

collected from the Revenue Department were scanned and superimposed on

the project area/ submergence area map to delineate the affected/ impacted

zone. These maps were extensively used to delineate the plots or parcels of

land likely to be affected due to the process of land acquisition. A list of such

plots was prepared to correlate with ownership details through the RoRs.

2.2 IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT AFFECTED VILLAGES

A total of 134 villages will be affected, of which 123 villages are affected in the

Pancheshwar MPDP (Refer Table-2.1) and 11 villages in the Rupaligad RDP

(Refer Table).

Table-2.1: List of affected villages of Pancheshwar MPP

S. No. Village Name Tehsil District Status

1 Nishani Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

2 Gogana Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

3 Rarikhuti Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

4 Jamrari Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

5 Kharku Bhalya Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Fully Affected

6 Matyal/Matyal Chakawali Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Fully Affected

7 Bhalya Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Fully Affected

8 Upertola Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

9 Pati Palchura Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

10 Salla Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

11 Sail Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

12 Tameria Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

13 Haldu Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Fully Affected

14 Kwerali Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

15 Sakun Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

16 Dhyan Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

17 Kuteri Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected




18 Tarigaon Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

19 Gyal Pipali Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

20 Baunakot Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

21 Basaur Mainan Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

22 Baltari Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Fully Affected

23 Gaurihat Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

24 Rajyoura Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

25 Kanari Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Fully Affected

26 Majirkanda Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

27 Getigada Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

28 Bateri Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

29 Amtari Kanalichina Pithoragarh Fully Affected

30 Ranuwa Kanalichina Pithoragarh Fully Affected

31 Bathauli Kanalichina Pithoragarh Fully Affected

32 Dyora Kanalichina Pithoragarh Partially Affected

33 Sunkholi Kanalichina Pithoragarh Fully Affected

34 Pantsera Kanalichina Pithoragarh Partially Affected

35 Syuwan Kanalichina Pithoragarh Partially Affected

36 Dwali Sera Kanalichina Pithoragarh Partially Affected

37 Ghigharani Didihat Pithoragarh Fully Affected

38 Sailoni Didihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

39 Chamtoli Didihat Pithoragarh Fully Affected

40 Titri Didihat Pithoragarh Fully Affected

41 Bagadihat Didihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

42 Bheliya Didihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

43 Jogyoura Didihat Pithoragarh Fully Affected

44 Garjiya Didihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

45 Jamtari Didihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

46 Oltari Didihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

47 Daulani Kanalichina Pithoragarh Partially Affected

48 Toli* Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

49 Tham Dharchula Pithoragarh Partially Affected

50 Duti Bagarh Dharchula Pithoragarh Partially Affected

51 Dungatoli Dharchula Pithoragarh Partially Affected

52 Kimkhola Dharchula Pithoragarh Partially Affected

53 Bokata Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

54 Bungli Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

55 Bursum Bari Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

56 Dhandadhar Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

57 Dubola-Birtola Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

58 Kuinar* Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

59 Kuntola Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

60 Tudli Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected




61 Nali Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

62 Seraghara Gangolihat Pithoragarh Fully Affected

63 Sinoli Bhamalta Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

64 Jatrola Gangolihat Pithoragarh Fully Affected

65 Rasyun Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

66 Kharkholi Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

67 Askora Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

68 Pali Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

69 Raitoli Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

70 Rautora Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

71 Timta Chamdungra Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

72 Damde* Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

73 Duni Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

74 Chaur Ghurelli Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

75 Tulkand* Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

76 Sibana Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

77 Sugari* Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

78 Busail Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

79 Garali Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

80 Anwala Talla Mall Sugar

Mavla

Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

81 Sauli Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

82 Dhajari Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

83 Diyuri Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

84 Suwal Gangolihat Pithoragarh Partially Affected

85 Tallisar Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

86 Khatigaon Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

87 Garali Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Partially Affected

88 Nali Malli Almora Almora Partially Affected

89 Kunj Kimola Almora Almora Partially Affected

90 Umer Almora Almora Partially Affected

91 Bamouri Khalsa / Bamori Almora Almora Fully Affected

92 Ara Salpar Bhanoli Almora Partially Affected

93 Kola/Kaula Bhanoli Almora Fully Affected

94 Mayoli Bhanoli Almora Partially Affected

95 Deol Siri Bhanoli Almora Partially Affected

96 Dasoli Badiyar Bhanoli Almora Partially Affected

97 Kana Pokhari Bhanoli Almora Partially Affected

98 Uncha Bauragunth Bhanoli Almora Fully Affected

99 Bali Khet Bhanoli Almora Partially Affected

100 Nali Talli Almora Almora Partially Affected

101 Dhura Laga Taak Bhanoli Almora Fully Affected

102 Birkhola Bhanoli Almora Partially Affected




103 Dhankana Bhanoli Almora Partially Affected

104 Melta* Almora Almora Partially Affected

105 Nayal Dhura Rangol Almora Partially Affected

106 Padoli Almora Almora Partially Affected

107 Jingal Almora Almora Partially Affected

108 Chimkholi Bhanoli Almora Partially Affected

109 Betta Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

110 Sulan Barakot Champawat Partially Affected

111 Netra Barakot Champawat Fully Affected

112 Sugar Khal Barakot Champawat Partially Affected

113 Batauri Mug Gunth Barakot Champawat Partially Affected

114 Kothere Barakot Champawat Partially Affected

115 Singda Barakot Champawat Partially Affected

116 Bruyuri Barakot Champawat Partially Affected

117 Gaika Jyula Barakot Champawat Partially Affected

118 Khai Kot Talla Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

119 Bibli Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

120 Simalkhet Pati Champawat Fully Affected

121 Khai Kot Malla Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

122 Choolgaon Barakot Champawat Partially Affected

123 Raygaon Barakot Champawat Partially Affected

Note: * = As per revenue records and field investigation, no private land or private

properties are likely to be acquired/ impacted in villages Toli, Kuinar, Damde,

Tulkhand and Sugari in district Pithoragarh and village Melta in district Almora; thus

there are no PAFs losing land or homesteads from these villages. However,

government land and/or forest land is impacted.

Table-2.2: List of affected villages of Rupaligad RDP


1 Bachkot Champawat Champawat Partially Affected

2 Polap Champawat Champawat Partially Affected

3 Nidil Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

4 Jindi Sorari Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

5 Bhagauti Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

6 Dungraleti Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

7 Pasam Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

8 Ashlad Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

9 Jamarso Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

10 Matiyali Lohaghat Champawat Partially Affected

11 Chilniya Pati Champawat Partially Affected



2.3 ACQUISITION OF PRIVATE LAND

The details of ownership status of land to be acquired on Indian portion is given

in Tables-2.3 to 2.6.

Table-2.3 Ownership status of land to be acquired for various project

appurtenance on Indian portion

Category Area (ha)

Private 3735.80 (Refer Tables-2.4 to 2.7)

Forest 2422.50

Government 2941.70

Total 9100.00 ha

Source: Revenue, Forest Department and Property Survey

Table-2.4: Details of land to be acquired for the project

S. No. Parameter Total Private Land Acquired (ha)

1 Pancheshwar Fully Affected Villages 463.81

2 Pancheshwar Partially Affected Villages 3227.83

3 Rupalgadi Partially Affected Villages 44.16

Total 3735.8

Source: Property Survey

Table-2.5: Details of private land to be acquired in Fully Affected Villages of Pancheshwar Dam

S. No. Village Name Acquired land (m2)

1 Khadku bhaalya 26.5540

2 Matyal/ matyal chakawali 14.5920

3 Bhalya 19.2845

4 Haldu 41.8962

5 Baltari 43.5132

6 Kanari 3.8598

7 Amtari 23.9930

8 Renuwa 22.9684

9 Bathauli 6.9370

10 Sunkholi 12.1660

11 Ghigharani 26.2500

12 Chamtoli 26.3950

13 Titri 53.7840

14 Jogyoura 23.4340

15 Seraghat 9.1224

16 Jartola 24.9480

17 Aara salpar 32.3184

18 Kunj kimola 3.9258

19 Uncha bera 9.3022




20 Dhura laga taak 16.2622

21 Netra 13.0260

22 Simalkhet 9.2781

Total Land 463.8100

Source: Revenue Department and Property Survey

Table-2.6: Details of private land to be acquired in Partially Affected Villages of Pancheshwar Dam


1 Nisni 2.70700

2 Gogana 11.70190

3 Rarikhuti 29.10300

4 Jamrari 11.23895

5 Upertola 21.57800

6 Pati Palchaura 3.68087

7 Salla 17.93499

8 Sail 11.65500

9 Taremia 49.79410

10 Kwerali 1.61048

11 Sakun 16.43890

12 Dhyan 0.65000

13 Kuteri 7.52500

14 Tarigaon 23.99300

15 Gyal Pipli 4.32000

16 Baunkot 4.83700

17 Basaur manain 8.45000

18 Gaurihat 4.31012

19 Rajyoura 6.53700

20 Majirakanda 1279.21245

21 Getigada 24.21205

22 Bhateri 0.02800

23 Dyora 40.12150

24 Panthsera 30.19686

25 Syuwan 1.86341

26 Dwalishera 35.40190

27 Sailoni 23.07000

28 Bagadihat 25.80360

29 Bheliya 0.96900

30 Garjiya 18.82800

31 Jamtari 2.39600

32 Oltari 9.66610

33 Daulani 2.26700

34 Toli NO PRIVATE LAND ACQUISTION

35 Thaam 0.68930

36 Duti bagar 12.96164

37 Dungatoli 7.12600

38 Kimkhola 23.37380

39 Bokata 7.79715




40 Bungli 4.96858

41 Bursum bari 3.46960

42 Dandadhar 9.13900

43 Dubola birtola 17.68800

44 Kuinar NO PRIVATE LAND ACQUISTION

45 Kuntola 9.81378

46 Tudli 2.77841

47 Nali 4.62185

48 Sinloi bhamalta 2.21400

49 Rasyun 8.06651

50 Kharkoli 7.71901

51 Askora 1.64178

52 Pali 1.73099

53 Raitoli 6.69492

54 Rautora 1.79600

55 Timta chamdungra 0.92600

56 Damde NO PRIVATE LAND ACQUISTION

57 Duni NO PRIVATE LAND ACQUISTION

58 Dhaur ghurelli 2.21981

59 Tulkhand NO PRIVATE LAND ACQUISTION

60 Sibna 3.01000

61 Sugari NO PRIVATE LAND ACQUISTION

62 Busail NO PRIVATE LAND ACQUISTION

63 Garali 0.73017

64 Anwala talla malla sugar mavla 0.60900

65 Sauli NO PRIVATE LAND ACQUISTION

66 Dhajari 0.56527

67 Diyuri 1.31004

68 Suwal 6.17675

69 Tallisar 9.42734

70 Khatigaon 2.57600

71 Garali 3.09900

72 Nalli malli 23.24242

73 Umer 989.40000

74 Bamori 12.75400

75 Kola 10.06800

76 Mayoli 1.40300

77 Deolisiri 3.14435

78 Dasoli badiyar 25.79314

79 Kuna pokhri 3.26800

80 Balikhet 24.13736

81 Talli nalli 15.30020




82 Birkola 2.28664

83 Dhankana 5.89859

84 Melta NO PRIVATE LAND ACQUISTION

85 Nayal dhura 13.67211

86 Padoli 3.75900

87 Jingal 7.54119

88 Dhimkholi 10.69234

89 Betta 5.18200

90 Sulan 15.79300

91 Sugarkhal 9.71168

92 Botari mug gunth 37.46900

93 Kuthera 13.33462

94 Singra 0.36800

95 Bruyuri 0.44730

96 Gaika jhula 1.24900

97 Khaikot talla 10.39290

98 Vivel 51.22802

99 Khaikhot malla 17.95193

100 Choolgaon 13.91700

101 Raygaon 1.38814

Total Land ha 3227.83381


Table-2.7: Details of private land to be acquired in Partially Affected Villages of

Rupalugad Dam


1 Bachkot 0.09

2 Polap 0.01

3 Nidil 17.27

4 Jindi sorari 6.67

5 Bagauti 1.47

6 Dungraleti 4.86

7 Pasam 6.65

8 Ashlad 0.99

9 Jamar sau 1.93

10 Matiyani 3.20

11 Chilniya 1.03

Total Land ha 44.16


2.4 ENUMERATION OF PAFS AFFECTED DUE TO LAND ACQUISITION

After the affected/ impacted zone was delineation on the superimposed khasra

maps, a list of all the affected khasra/ plot numbers within the impacted zone



was prepared. Thereafter, revenue records, viz., Right of Records (RoRs) were

collected for all the affected villages. The State of Uttarakhand has

computerized and uploaded RoRs on their website: www.devbhumi.uk.gov.in

which was collected and computerized for analysis. The RoRs provided

ownership details of land parcels within each affected village. The list of

affected land plots/ parcels was correlated with the RoRs to establish

ownership details of each affected land plots. Analysis of the RoRs lead to

enumeration of affected persons/ families/ land titleholders and information was

compiled to show PAFs likely to lose land only, land and homesteads and

homesteads only. The village-wise PAFs likely to lose land only, land and

homesteads and homesteads only for Pancheshwar MPP and Rupaligad RDP

are listed in Tables 2.8 and 2.9. The summary of number of PAFs likely to be

affected due to the project are given in Table-2.10.

Table-2.8: Village-wise list of PAFs losing Land Only, Land & Homestead and

Homestead for Pancheshwar MPP

S. No. District Name Village Name Land &

house

Only

Land

Total

1 Pithoragarh Nishani 17 29 46

2 Pithoragarh Gogana 49 868 917

3 Pithoragarh Rarikhunti 337 337

4 Pithoragarh Jamrari 12 311 323

5 Pithoragarh Kharku-Bhalya 30 180 210

6 Pithoragarh Matyal/ Matyal

Chakawali

49 74 123

7 Pithoragarh Bhalya 37 220 257

8 Pithoragarh Upertola 14 241 255

9 Pithoragarh Pati Palchura 96 96

10 Pithoragarh Salla 5 237 242

11 Pithoragarh Sail 184 184

12 Pithoragarh Tade Miya 74 327 401

13 Pithoragarh Haldu 20 504 524

14 Pithoragarh Kwerali 1 61 62

15 Pithoragarh Sakun 361 361

16 Pithoragarh Dhyan 41 41

17 Pithoragarh Kutheri 105 105

18 Pithoragarh Tarigaon 31 630 661

19 Pithoragarh Gyal Pipali 4 94 98

20 Pithoragarh Baunakot 5 126 131

21 Pithoragarh Basaur Mainan 270 270

22 Pithoragarh Baltari 50 703 753

23 Pithoragarh Gaurihat 220 220

http://www.devbhumi.uk.gov.in/




house

Only

Land

Total

24 Pithoragarh Rajyoura 10 169 179

25 Pithoragarh Kanari 40 35 75

26 Pithoragarh Majirkanda 85 1426 1511

27 Pithoragarh Getigara 20 410 430

28 Pithoragarh Bateri 5 5

29 Pithoragarh Amtari 25 226 251

30 Pithoragarh Renuwa 12 131 143

31 Pithoragarh Bathauli 16 16

32 Pithoragarh Dyora 36 107 143

33 Pithoragarh Sunkholi 6 43 49

34 Pithoragarh Panthsera 221 221

35 Pithoragarh Syuwan 21 21

36 Pithoragarh Dwalisera 77 65 142

37 Pithoragarh Ghigharani 19 112 131

38 Pithoragarh Sailoni 15 89 104

39 Pithoragarh Chamtoli 56 56

40 Pithoragarh Titri 53 123 176

41 Pithoragarh Bagadihat 26 176 202

42 Pithoragarh Bheliya 3 3

43 Pithoragarh Jogyoura 12 53 65

44 Pithoragarh Garjiya 253 253

45 Pithoragarh Jamtari 1 48 49

46 Pithoragarh Oltari 96 96

47 Pithoragarh Daulani 11 13 24

48 Pithoragarh Toli 1 1

49 Pithoragarh Tham 76 76

50 Pithoragarh Duti Bhagarh 549 549

51 Pithoragarh Dungatoli 7 109 116

52 Pithoragarh Kimkhola 13 55 68

53 Pithoragarh Bokata 551 551

54 Pithoragarh Bungli 4 280 284

55 Pithoragarh Bursum Bari 7 235 242

56 Pithoragarh Dhandadhar 2 153 155

57 Pithoragarh Dubola-Birtola 21 64 85

58 Pithoragarh Kuinar 1 1

59 Pithoragarh Kuntola 440 440

60 Pithoragarh Tudli 515 515

61 Pithoragarh Nali 261 261

62 Pithoragarh Seraghat 14 95 109

63 Pithoragarh Sinoli Bhamalta 9 72 81

64 Pithoragarh Jartola 19 113 132

65 Pithoragarh Rasyun 850 850




house

Only

Land

Total

66 Pithoragarh Kharkoli 15 304 319

67 Pithoragarh Askora 30 311 341

68 Pithoragarh Pali 303 303

69 Pithoragarh Raitoli 25 1074 1099

70 Pithoragarh Raitora 61 61

71 Pithoragarh Timta

Chamdungra

8 48 56

72 Pithoragarh Damde 1 1

73 Pithoragarh Duni 1 1

74 Pithoragarh Chaurghurali 83 83

75 Pithoragarh Tulkhand 1 1

76 Pithoragarh Sibna 1 40 41

77 Pithoragarh Sugari 1 1

78 Pithoragarh Busial 435 435

79 Pithoragarh Garali 110 110

80 Pithoragarh Anwala Talla

Malla Sugar

Naula

47 47

81 Pithoragarh Dhajari 84 84

82 Pithoragarh Diyuri 105 105

83 Pithoragarh Suwal 104 104

84 Pithoragarh Tallisar 563 563

85 Pithoragarh Khetigaon 120 120

86 Pithoragarh Garali 174 174

87 Almora Malli Nalli 612 612

88 Almora Umer 85 85

89 Almora Bamori 23 248 271

90 Almora Aara Salpar 18 859 877

91 Almora Kola 87 87

92 Almora Kunj Kimola 320 320

93 Almora Mayoli 27 27

94 Almora Dwali Siddi 154 154

95 Almora Dasoli Badiyar 471 471

96 Almora Kuna Phokri 8 52 60

97 Almora Uncha Bera 471 471

98 Almora Balikhet 640 640

99 Almora Talli Nalli 462 462

100 Almora Dhura Laga Taak 431 431

101 Almora Birkola 193 193

102 Almora Dhankana 7 65 72

103 Almora Melta 1 1

104 Almora Nayal Dhura 31 245 276




house

Only

Land

Total

105 Almora Padoli 30 30

106 Almora Jingal 3 529 532

107 Almora Chimkholi 181 181

108 Champawat Betta 6 49 55

109 Champawat Salan 15 71 86

110 Champawat Netra 51 165 216

111 Champawat Sugarkhal 336 336

112 Champawat Bautari 49 408 457

113 Champawat Kuthere 302 302

114 Champawat Singda 9 201 210

115 Champawat Bruyuri 13 14 27

116 Champawat Gaika Jula 6 46 52

117 Champawat Khai Kot Thall 127 127

118 Champawat Vivel 23 401 424

119 Champawat Simalkhet 494 494

120 Champawat Khai Kot Malla 315 315

121 Champawat Choolagaon 206 206

122 Champawat Raygaon 349 349

Total 1283 28153 29436


Table-2.9: Village wise list of Affected PAFs for Rupaligad RDP


house

Only

Land

Total

1 Champawat Bachkot 16 16

2 Champawat Polap 26 26

3 Champawat Nidil 221 221

4 Champawat Jindi Sorari 361 361

5 Champawat Bagauti 3 3

6 Champawat Dungraleti 2 291 293

7 Champawat Pasam 11 152 163

8 Champawat Ashlad 17 17

9 Champawat Jamar Sau 158 158

10 Champawat Matiyani 153 153

11 Champawat Chilniya 12 164 176

Total 25 1562 1587




Table-2.10: Summary of PAFs in Pancheshwar MPP and Rupaligad RDP

S. No. Dam No. of

villages

PAFs

losing land

and houses

PAFs

losing only

land

Total PAFs

1. Pancheshwar

MPP

122 1283 28153 29436

2. Rupaligad RDP 12 25 1562 1587

Total 1308 29715 31023


It was assessed that in all there are 1308 affected persons/ families that are

likely to be displace/ evicted from their homesteads. Project-wise, there are

1283 PAFs from 59 villages and 25 PAFs from 3 villages in Pancheshwar

MPDP and Rupaligad RDP respectively.

In all there are 29715 land titleholders/ project affected persons/ families that

would lose their lands. This includes the PAFs from Pancheshwar MPDP and

Rupaligad RDP which reckons 28153 and 1562 respectively. It may be noted

that there are no families that are likely to be displaced from their homesteads

only and not lose their lands.

CHAPTER-3

ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE STATUS-SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS


Chapter 3: Environmental Baseline Status-Socio-Economic Aspects Page 1

CHAPTER-3

ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE STATUS-SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS

3.1 GENERAL

Before the start of any Environmental Impact Assessment study, it is necessary

to identify the baseline levels of relevant environmental parameters which are

likely to be affected as a result of the construction and operation of the

proposed project. The baseline study for Socio-Economic aspects has been

presented in this Chapter. The data presented in this chapter is mainly

extracted from Census of India 2011.

3.2 DEMOGRAHIC PROFILE OF VILLAGES

3.2.1 Population

As per 2011 Census the total population of the area is about 54488. The male

and female population in the villages is 48.2% and 51.8% respectively and

population below 6 years of age accounts for 15.0% of the total population. The

number of females per 1000 males is 1074 and average family (persons per

family) size is 5. The demographic details of are given in Table–3.1 and

depicted in Figure-3.1.

Table-3.1: Demographic Profile of Study Area villages

S. No. District Village

Name To

tal

Ho

us

eh

old

s

T

ota

l

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal M

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Fem

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

Se

x R

ati

o

Av

era

ge

Fam

ily

Siz

e

Po

pu

lati

on

<

6 y

ea

rs

Se

x R

ati

o

PANCHESHWAR MPDP

1 Pithoragarh Nisani 154 711 364 347 953 5 108 742

2 Pithoragarh Gogana 321 1457 735 722 982 5 226 883

3 Pithoragarh

Rari

Khunti 36

175 89 86 966 5 27 588

4 Pithoragarh Jamrari 138 686 343 343 1000 5 116 966

5 Pithoragarh

Kharku

Bhalya 39

174 91 83 912 4 27 286

6 Pithoragarh Matiyal 41 186 103 83 806 5 28 867

7 Pithoragarh Bhalya 51 212 111 101 910 4 39 696

8 Pithoragarh Upertola 65 387 201 186 925 6 73 738




Name To

tal

Ho

us

eh

old

s

T

ota

l

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal M

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Fem

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

Se

x R

ati

o

Av

era

ge

Fam

ily S

ize

Po

pu

lati

on

<

6 y

ea

rs

Se

x R

ati

o

9

Pithoragarh

Poli

Palchaur

a

48

224 100 124 1240 5 40 739

10 Pithoragarh Salla 231 1113 514 599 1165 5 192 811

11 Pithoragarh Sail 196 1020 470 550 1170 5 173 966

12 Pithoragarh

Taramiy

a 105

554 251 303 1207 5 121 891

13 Pithoragarh

Haldu(S

oniya) 82

401 178 223 1253 5 70 707

14 Pithoragarh Kwerali 137 547 265 282 1064 4 73 521

15 Pithoragarh Sakun 91 377 179 198 1106 4 31 722

16 Pithoragarh Dhyarh 37 162 82 80 976 4 26 444

17 Pithoragarh Kuteri* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

18 Pithoragarh Tarigaon 39 168 75 93 1240 4 21 1100

19 Pithoragarh

Gyal

Pipali 24

128 64 64 1000 5 18 1000

20 Pithoragarh

Baun

Kote 12

63 29 34 1172 5 7

21 Pithoragarh

Basaur

Mainan 46

185 83 102 1229 4 16 2200

22 Pithoragarh Baltari 92 360 167 193 1156 4 44 517

23 Pithoragarh Gaurihat 219 895 419 476 1136 4 92 736

24 Pithoragarh Rajyoura 47 205 106 99 934 4 28 556

25 Pithoragarh Kanari 67 286 123 163 1325 4 37 1313

26 Pithoragarh

Majirkan

da 637

2404 1267 1137 897 4 275 763

27 Pithoragarh

Gethi

Gara 75

356 178 178 1000 5 50 613

28 Pithoragarh Bhateri 255

115

2 558 594 1065 5 137 756

29 Pithoragarh Amatari 43 157 71 86 1211 4 10 2333

30 Pithoragarh Ranuwa 36 143 75 68 907 4 20 1222

31 Pithoragarh Bathauli 115 506 239 267 1117 4 63 703

32 Pithoragarh Dyora 132 624 301 323 1073 5 98 849

33 Pithoragarh Sunkholi 37 148 79 69 873 4 15 250

34 Pithoragarh

Pant

Sera 95

388 180 208 1156 4 49 885

35 Pithoragarh Syuwan 53 248 125 123 984 5 14 400




Name To

tal

Ho

us

eh

old

s

T

ota

l

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal M

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Fem

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

Se

x R

ati

o

Av

era

ge

Fam

ily S

ize

Po

pu

lati

on

<

6 y

ea

rs

Se

x R

ati

o

36 Pithoragarh

Dwali

Sera 139

624 312 312 1000 4 93 476

37 Pithoragarh

Ghighar

ani 65

328 157 171 1089 5 53 1304

38 Pithoragarh Sailoni 101 385 179 206 1151 4 47 1238

39 Pithoragarh Chamtoli 13 58 31 27 871 4 10 1000

40 Pithoragarh Titari 121 523 252 271 1075 4 79 927

41 Pithoragarh

Bagari

Hat 112

473 219 254 1160 4 77 833

42 Pithoragarh Bheliya 55 243 153 90 588 4 20 667

43 Pithoragarh Jogyura 39 162 72 90 1250 4 21 909

44 Pithoragarh Garjiya 62 295 142 153 1077 5 42 556

45 Pithoragarh Jamtari 89 352 182 170 934 4 47 741

46 Pithoragarh Oltari 73 369 189 180 952 5 27 1077

47 Pithoragarh Daulani 14 37 15 22 1467 3 3 0

48 Pithoragarh Toli 40 186 82 104 1268 5 23 769

49 Pithoragarh Tham 11 58 25 33 1320 5 12 333

50 Pithoragarh

Duti

Bagad 506

159

9 889 710 799 3 176 676

51 Pithoragarh

Dhunga

Toli 235

102

5 480 545 1135 4 142 868

52 Pithoragarh

Kimkhol

a 56

252 116 136 1172 5 46 917

53 Pithoragarh Bokata 133 547 282 265 940 4 85 809

54 Pithoragarh

Bungli

Gunth 290

1404 662 742 1121 5 255 917

55 Pithoragarh

Bursum

Bari 141

712 372 340 914 5 109 817

56 Pithoragarh

Dhandad

har* 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

57 Pithoragarh

Dubola

Bitola 54

224 120 104 867 4 25 471

58 Pithoragarh Quinar 7 39 20 19 950 6 3 500

59 Pithoragarh Kuntola 239 1125 532 593 1115 5 183 887

60 Pithoragarh Tudil 18 84 42 42 1000 5 20 1000

61 Pithoragarh Nali 156 712 345 367 1064 5 104 891

62 Pithoragarh

Sera

Ghara 25

104 53 51 962 4 5 667




Name To

tal

Ho

us

eh

old

s

T

ota

l

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal M

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Fem

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

Se

x R

ati

o

Av

era

ge

Fam

ily S

ize

Po

pu

lati

on

<

6 y

ea

rs

Se

x R

ati

o

63

Pithoragarh

Sinoli

Bhawalt

a

13

79 40 39 975 6 16 333

64 Pithoragarh Jartola 27 114 56 58 1036 4 17 889

65 Pithoragarh Rasyun 54 196 82 114 1390 4 35 842

66 Pithoragarh Kharkoli 50 206 91 115 1264 4 29 706

67 Pithoragarh Askora 55 256 110 146 1327 5 44 1000

68 Pithoragarh Pali 150 695 343 352 1026 5 89 816

69 Pithoragarh Raitola 44 169 81 88 1086 4 22 571

70 Pithoragarh Rautora 93 402 196 206 1051 4 46 394

71

Pithoragarh

Cham

Dungara

Timta

276

1409 701 708 1010 5 262 858

72 Pithoragarh

Damde

Or 174

894 451 443 982 5 139 655

73 Pithoragarh Duni 257 1250 628 622 990 5 151 987

74 Pithoragarh

Chaur

Duroli 109

489 226 263 1164 4 63 750

75 Pithoragarh

Tulakha

nd 48

220 100 120 1200 5 35 1917

76 Pithoragarh Sibana 13 49 24 25 1042 4 4 333

77 Pithoragarh Sugari 125 580 262 318 1214 5 89 816

78 Pithoragarh Busail 109 500 226 274 1212 5 72 895

79 Pithoragarh Garali 31 121 53 68 1283 4 16 600

80

Pithoragarh

Anwala

Talla

Malla

Sugar

Mavla

45

196 95 101 1063 4 34 1125

81 Pithoragarh Sauli 19 70 30 40 1333 4 14 1000

82 Pithoragarh Dhajari* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

83 Pithoragarh Diyuri 16 82 44 38 864 5 10 1000

84 Pithoragarh Suwal 20 82 37 45 1216 4 7 1333

85 Pithoragarh Tallisar 96 383 193 190 984 4 44 833

86 Pithoragarh

Khati

Gaon 137

646 303 343 1132 5 92 840

87 Pithoragarh Garali 107 452 213 239 1122 4 80 1000

88 Almora Nali Talli 95 415 171 244 1427 4 49 885




Name To

tal

Ho

us

eh

old

s

T

ota

l

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal M

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Fem

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

Se

x R

ati

o

Av

era

ge

Fam

ily S

ize

Po

pu

lati

on

<

6 y

ea

rs

Se

x R

ati

o

89 Almora Umer 20 92 44 48 1091 5 11 571

90 Almora

Bamouri

Khalsa 21

100 48 52 1083 5 11 571

91 Almora

Ara

Salpar 240

1128 500 628 1256 5 166 824

92 Almora Kola 47 249 112 137 1223 5 39 950

93 Almora Malar 60 306 131 175 1336 5 53 1208

94 Almora Mayoli 54 218 101 117 1158 4 27 421

95 Almora Dewalsiri 48 263 127 136 1071 5 47 1765

96 Almora

Dasoli

Badiyar 246

1184 544 640 1176 5 192 811

97 Almora

Kuna

Pokhari 40

165 85 80 941 4 24 846

98

Almora

Uncha

Bauragu

nth*

0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

99 Almora Bali Khet 66 318 131 187 1427 5 46 1556

100 Almora Nali Malli 125 554 259 295 1139 4 85 848

101 Almora

Ghura

lagga tak 50

221 89 132 1483 4 21 1100

102 Almora Birkola 68 319 126 193 1532 5 58 2053

103 Almora

Dhankan

a 11

50 23 27 1174 5 10 1500

104 Almora Melta 7 51 22 29 1318 7 13 1600

105 Almora

Nayal

Dhura 59

212 114 98 860 4 15 1500

106 Almora Padoli 19 74 33 41 1242 4 12 500

107 Almora Jingal 38 236 124 112 903 6 44 833

108 Almora

Chimkho

li 28

115 43 72 1674 4 18 2000

109 Champawat Betta 31 133 61 72 1180 4 26 1000

110 Champawat Sulan* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

111 Champawat Netra 32 174 89 85 955 5 20 538

112 Champawat

Sugar

Khal 94

555 267 288 1079 6 90 1143

113 Champawat Batauri 120 587 305 282 925 5 113 712

114 Champawat Kothera 85 371 185 186 1005 4 55 774

115 Champawat Sigda 157 772 413 359 869 5 100 587




Name To

tal

Ho

us

eh

old

s

T

ota

l

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal M

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Fem

ale

Po

pu

lati

on

Se

x R

ati

o

Av

era

ge

Fam

ily S

ize

Po

pu

lati

on

<

6 y

ea

rs

Se

x R

ati

o

116 Champawat Bruyuri 47 194 82 112 1366 4 27 1077

117 Champawat

Gaika

Jyula 29

164 79 85 1076 6 41 1412

118 Champawat

Khai Kot

Talla 56

239 109 130 1193 4 50 1083

119 Champawat Bibli* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

120 Champawat

Simalkh

et 7

31 21 10 476 4 0

121 Champawat

Khai Kot

Malla 72

378 169 209 1237 5 74 1176

122 Champawat

Choolga

on 57

279 142 137 965 5 43 955

123 Champawat

Raighao

n 254

1257 619 638 1031 5 195 857

Subtotal (A) 1

1041 4

9666

2

4091

2

5575

1

28188 4

7

256 1062

RUPALI GAD RDP

124 Champawat Bachkot 77 319 144 175 1215 4 53 710

125 Champawat Polap 69 289 128 161 1258 4 44 692

126 Champawat Nidil 86 373 160 213 1331 4 61 906

127 Champawat

Jindi

Sorari 18

84 46 38 826 5 18 500

128 Champawat Bagauti 94 446 218 228 1046 5 66 1000

129 Champawat Dungraleti 174 866 369 497 1347 5 179 1106

130 Champawat Pasam 108 546 252 294 1167 5 96 1182

131 Champawat Aslad 45 223 108 115 1065 5 43 536

132 Champawat

Jamarsa

wn 43

189 79 110 1392 4 32 684

133 Champawat Matiyani 168 895 381 514 1349 5 196 1021

134 Champawat Chilniya 103 592 298 294 987 6 110 964

Subtotal (B)

985

4822 2183

2639

12983

5

898

1209

Total(A+B)

12026

54488 26274

28214

141171

5

8154

1074

Source: 2011 Census



Figure-3.1: Demographic profile of the Study Area Villages

3.2.2 Caste Profile

According to Census 2011 data that the General Caste Population 71.8% is the

dominant caste in the villages followed by Schedule Tribe Population 27.5%

and Schedule Caste population 0.7%. The village wise caste profile of the area

is summarized in Table-3.2 and depicted in Figure-3.2.

Table-3.2: Caste Profile of the Study Area Villages

S. No. District Village Name

To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Ge

ne

ral

cas

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Ca

ste

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Tri

be

Po

pu

lati

on

PANCHESHWAR MPDP

1 Pithoragarh Nisani 711 594 117 0

2 Pithoragarh Gogana 1457 998 459 0

3 Pithoragarh Rari Khunti 175 175 0 0

4 Pithoragarh Jamrari 686 539 147 0

5 Pithoragarh Kharku

Bhalya

174 122 52 0

6 Pithoragarh Matiyal 186 0 186 0

7 Pithoragarh Bhalya 212 1 211 0

8 Pithoragarh Upertola 387 0 386 1

9 Pithoragarh Poli

Palchaura

224 224 0 0

10 Pithoragarh Salla 1113 774 339 0

11 Pithoragarh Sail 1020 647 373 0

12 Pithoragarh Taramiya 554 363 191 0

13 Pithoragarh Haldu(Soniya) 401 300 101 0

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

TOTAL MALE POPULATION TOTAL FEMALE POPULATION

24091 25575

2183 2639

Pancheshwar MPDP Rupaligad RDP




To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Ge

ne

ral

cas

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Ca

ste

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Tri

be

Po

pu

lati

on

14 Pithoragarh Kwerali 547 541 6 0

15 Pithoragarh Sakun 377 375 2 0

16 Pithoragarh Dhyarh 162 160 2 0

17 Pithoragarh Kuteri 0

18 Pithoragarh Tarigaon 168 133 35 0

19 Pithoragarh Gyal Pipali 128 74 54 0

20 Pithoragarh Baun Kote 63 15 48 0

21 Pithoragarh Basaur

Mainan

185 110 75 0

22 Pithoragarh Baltari 360 284 76 0

23 Pithoragarh Gaurihat 895 717 178 0

24 Pithoragarh Rajyoura 205 153 52 0

25 Pithoragarh Kanari 286 189 97 0

26 Pithoragarh Majirkanda 2404 1917 479 8

27 Pithoragarh Gethi Gara 356 208 148 0

28 Pithoragarh Bhateri 1152 774 378 0

29 Pithoragarh Amatari 157 83 74 0

30 Pithoragarh Ranuwa 143 91 52 0

31 Pithoragarh Bathauli 506 494 12 0

32 Pithoragarh Dyora 624 479 145 0

33 Pithoragarh Sunkholi 148 148 0 0

34 Pithoragarh Pant Sera 388 336 52 0

35 Pithoragarh Syuwan 248 110 138 0

36 Pithoragarh Dwali Sera 624 209 415 0

37 Pithoragarh Ghigharani 328 122 206 0

38 Pithoragarh Sailoni 385 278 106 1

39 Pithoragarh Chamtoli 58 29 29 0

40 Pithoragarh Titari 523 224 299 0

41 Pithoragarh Bagari Hat 473 161 312 0

42 Pithoragarh Bheliya 243 181 62 0

43 Pithoragarh Jogyura 162 63 99 0

44 Pithoragarh Garjiya 295 237 58 0

45 Pithoragarh Jamtari 352 218 134 0

46 Pithoragarh Oltari 369 114 221 34

47 Pithoragarh Daulani 37 32 5 0

48 Pithoragarh Toli 186 171 15 0

49 Pithoragarh Tham 58 58 0 0

50 Pithoragarh Duti Bagad 1599 877 375 347

51 Pithoragarh Dhunga Toli 1025 771 252 2

52 Pithoragarh Kimkhola 252 217 35 0




To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Ge

ne

ral

cas

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Ca

ste

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Tri

be

Po

pu

lati

on

53 Pithoragarh Bokata 547 362 185 0

54 Pithoragarh Bungli Gunth 1404 1288 116 0

55 Pithoragarh Bursum Bari 712 511 201 0

56 Pithoragarh Dhandadhar 0

57 Pithoragarh Dubola Bitola 224 221 3 0

58 Pithoragarh Quinar 39 39 0 0

59 Pithoragarh Kuntola 1125 741 384 0

60 Pithoragarh Tudil 84 0 84 0

61 Pithoragarh Nali 712 629 83 0

62 Pithoragarh Sera Ghara 104 102 2 0

63 Pithoragarh Sinoli

Bhawalta

79 79 0 0

64 Pithoragarh Jartola 114 99 15 0

65 Pithoragarh Rasyun 196 196 0 0

66 Pithoragarh Kharkoli 206 206 0 0

67 Pithoragarh Askora 256 256 0 0

68 Pithoragarh Pali 695 237 458 0

69 Pithoragarh Raitola 169 139 30 0

70 Pithoragarh Rautora 402 402 0 0

71 Pithoragarh Cham

Dungara

Timta

1409 559 850 0

72 Pithoragarh Damde Or 894 237 657 0

73 Pithoragarh Duni 1250 877 373 0

74 Pithoragarh Chaur Duroli 489 334 155 0

75 Pithoragarh Tulakhand 220 220 0 0

76 Pithoragarh Sibana 49 49 0 0

77 Pithoragarh Sugari 580 543 37 0

78 Pithoragarh Busail 500 424 76 0

79 Pithoragarh Garali 121 121 0 0

80 Pithoragarh Anwala Talla

Malla Sugar

Mavla

196 138 58 0

81 Pithoragarh Sauli 70 69 1 0

82 Pithoragarh Dhajari 0

83 Pithoragarh Diyuri 82 82 0 0

84 Pithoragarh Suwal 82 82 0 0

85 Pithoragarh Tallisar 383 284 99 0

86 Pithoragarh Khati Gaon 646 372 274 0





To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Ge

ne

ral

cas

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Ca

ste

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Tri

be

Po

pu

lati

on

88 Almora Nali Talli 415 406 9 0

89 Almora Umer 92 41 51 0

90 Almora Bamouri

Khalsa

100 77 23 0

91 Almora Ara Salpar 1128 1108 20 0

92 Almora Kola 249 249 0 0

93 Almora Malar 306 305 1 0

94 Almora Mayoli 218 146 72 0

95 Almora Dewalsiri 263 66 197 0

96 Almora Dasoli

Badiyar

1184 541 643 0

97 Almora Kuna Pokhari 165 117 48 0

98 Almora Uncha

Bauragunth

0 0 0 0

99 Almora Bali Khet 318 318 0 0

100 Almora Nali Malli 554 256 298 0

101 Almora Ghura lagga

tak

221 221 0 0

102 Almora Birkola 319 302 17 0

103 Almora Dhankana 50 50 0 0

104 Almora Melta 51 0 51 0

105 Almora Nayal Dhura 212 154 58 0

106 Almora Padoli 74 71 3 0

107 Almora Jingal 236 185 49 2

108 Almora Chimkholi 115 115 0 0

109 Champawat Betta 133 38 95 0

110 Champawat Sulan 0 0 0 0

111 Champawat Netra 174 174 0 0

112 Champawat Sugar Khal 555 555 0 0

113 Champawat Batauri 587 481 106 0

114 Champawat Kothera 371 273 98 0

115 Champawat Sigda 772 732 40 0

116 Champawat Bruyuri 194 157 37 0

117 Champawat Gaika Jyula 164 164 0 0

118 Champawat Khai Kot Talla 239 204 35 0

119 Champawat Bibli 0 0 0 0

120 Champawat Simalkhet 31 23 8 0

121 Champawat Khai Kot

Malla

378 314 64 0

122 Champawat Choolgaon 279 236 43 0




To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Ge

ne

ral

cas

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Ca

ste

Po

pu

lati

on

Sc

he

du

le

Tri

be

Po

pu

lati

on

123 Champawat Raighaon 1257 969 288 0

Subtotal(A) 49666 35301 13970 395

RUPALIGAD RDP

124 Champawat Bachkot 319 137 182 0

125 Champawat Polap 289 271 18 0

126 Champawat Nidil 373 346 27 0

127 Champawat Jindi Sorari 84 53 31 0

128 Champawat Bagauti 446 349 97 0

129 Champawat Dungraleti 866 777 89 0

130 Champawat Pasam 546 452 94 0

131 Champawat Aslad 223 80 143 0

132 Champawat Jamarsawn 189 177 12 0

133 Champawat Matiyani 895 591 304 0

134 Champawat Chilniya 592 582 10 0

Sub-total (B) 4822 3815 1007 0

Total(A+B) 54488 39116 14977 395

Source: 2011 Census

Figure-3.2: Caste profile of the Study Area Villages

3.2.3 Literacy rate

The total literate population in Study Area Villages is of the order of 64.5% (as

per 2011 census data). The overall illiterate population in the villages is 35.5%.

The male and female literacy rate in the villages is 75.6% and 65.97%

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000

General castePopulation

Schedule Caste Population

Schedule Tribe Population

Rupaligad RDP Pancheshwar MPDP



respectively. The details of literacy rate in Study Area Villages are given in

Table -3.3 and depicted in Figure-3.3.

Table-3.3: Literacy Profile of Study Area Villages

S.

No

District Village

Name

To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Po

pu

lati

on

Lit

era

te

Ma

le

Lit

era

te

Fem

ale

Lit

era

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Illite

rate

Ma

le

Illite

rate

Fem

ale

Illite

rate

PANCHESHWAR MPDP

1 Pithoragarh Nisani 711 473 280 193 238 84 154

2 Pithoragarh Gogana 1457 989 581 408 468 154 314

3 Pithoragarh Rari

Khunti

175 125 70 55 50 19 31

4 Pithoragarh Jamrari 686 434 265 169 252 78 174

5 Pithoragarh Kharku

Bhalya

174 123 70 53 51 21 30

6 Pithoragarh Matiyal 186 121 80 41 65 23 42

7 Pithoragarh Bhalya 212 137 85 52 75 26 49

8 Pithoragarh Upertola 387 256 150 106 131 51 80

9 Pithoragarh Poli

Palchaura

224 143 75 68 81 25 56

10 Pithoragarh Salla 1113 691 375 316 422 139 283

11 Pithoragarh Sail 1020 648 353 295 372 117 255

12 Pithoragarh Taramiya 554 315 170 145 239 81 158

13 Pithoragarh Haldu(Son

iya)

401 262 132 130 139 46 93

14 Pithoragarh Kwerali 547 362 188 174 185 77 108

15 Pithoragarh Sakun 377 275 153 122 102 26 76

16 Pithoragarh Dhyarh 162 114 61 53 48 21 27

17 Pithoragarh Kuteri

18 Pithoragarh Tarigaon 168 109 64 45 59 11 48

19 Pithoragarh Gyal Pipali 128 90 53 37 38 11 27

20 Pithoragarh Baun Kote 63 40 25 15 23 4 19

21 Pithoragarh Basaur

Mainan

185 125 73 52 60 10 50

22 Pithoragarh Baltari 360 246 134 112 114 33 81

23 Pithoragarh Gaurihat 895 686 358 328 209 61 148

24 Pithoragarh Rajyoura 205 130 80 50 75 26 49

25 Pithoragarh Kanari 286 196 98 98 90 25 65

26 Pithoragarh Majirkanda 2404 1842 1068 774 562 199 363

27 Pithoragarh Gethi Gara 356 229 131 98 127 47 80

28 Pithoragarh Bhateri 1152 780 441 339 372 117 255

29 Pithoragarh Amatari 157 105 57 48 52 14 38



S.

No

District Village

Name

To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Po

pu

lati

on

Lit

era

te

Ma

le

Lit

era

te

Fem

ale

Lit

era

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Illite

rate

Ma

le

Illite

rate

Fem

ale

Illite

rate

30 Pithoragarh Ranuwa 143 103 63 40 40 12 28

31 Pithoragarh Bathauli 506 343 182 161 163 57 106

32 Pithoragarh Dyora 624 443 238 205 181 63 118

33 Pithoragarh Sunkholi 148 129 67 62 19 12 7

34 Pithoragarh Pant Sera 388 308 148 160 80 32 48

35 Pithoragarh Syuwan 248 186 102 84 62 23 39

36 Pithoragarh Dwali Sera 624 386 210 176 238 102 136

37 Pithoragarh Ghigharani 328 239 134 105 89 23 66

38 Pithoragarh Sailoni 385 279 151 128 106 28 78

39 Pithoragarh Chamtoli 58 37 21 16 21 10 11

40 Pithoragarh Titari 523 342 188 154 181 64 117

41 Pithoragarh Bagari Hat 473 309 160 149 164 59 105

42 Pithoragarh Bheliya 243 144 96 48 99 57 42

43 Pithoragarh Jogyura 162 98 49 49 64 23 41

44 Pithoragarh Garjiya 295 210 102 108 85 40 45

45 Pithoragarh Jamtari 352 210 125 85 142 57 85

46 Pithoragarh Oltari 369 264 155 109 105 34 71

47 Pithoragarh Daulani 37 21 11 10 16 4 12

48 Pithoragarh Toli 186 139 69 70 47 13 34

49 Pithoragarh Tham 58 36 14 22 22 11 11

50 Pithoragarh Duti

Bagad

1599 1231 742 489 368 147 221

51 Pithoragarh Dhunga

Toli

1025 689 372 317 336 108 228

52 Pithoragarh Kimkhola 252 157 83 74 95 33 62

53 Pithoragarh Bokata 547 327 217 110 220 65 155

54 Pithoragarh Bungli

Gunth

1404 853 495 358 551 167 384

55 Pithoragarh Bursum

Bari

712 484 292 192 228 80 148

56 Pithoragarh Dhandadha

r

57 Pithoragarh Dubola

Bitola

224 175 101 74 49 19 30

58 Pithoragarh Quinar 39 30 16 14 9 4 5

59 Pithoragarh Kuntola 1125 670 361 309 455 171 284

60 Pithoragarh Tudil 84 54 30 24 30 12 18

61 Pithoragarh Nali 712 470 271 199 242 74 168

62 Pithoragarh Sera

Ghara

104 84 47 37 20 6 14



S.

No

District Village

Name

To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Po

pu

lati

on

Lit

era

te

Ma

le

Lit

era

te

Fem

ale

Lit

era

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Illite

rate

Ma

le

Illite

rate

Fem

ale

Illite

rate

63 Pithoragarh Sinoli

Bhawalta

79 47 27 20 32 13 19

64 Pithoragarh Jartola 114 71 42 29 43 14 29

65 Pithoragarh Rasyun 196 92 47 45 104 35 69

66 Pithoragarh Kharkoli 206 145 69 76 61 22 39

67 Pithoragarh Askora 256 158 82 76 98 28 70

68 Pithoragarh Pali 695 441 240 201 254 103 151

69 Pithoragarh Raitola 169 96 55 41 73 26 47

70 Pithoragarh Rautora 402 270 150 120 132 46 86

71 Pithoragarh Cham

Dungara

Timta

1409 839 486 353 570 215 355

72 Pithoragarh Damde Or 894 526 317 209 368 134 234

73 Pithoragarh Duni 1250 838 492 346 412 136 276

74 Pithoragarh Chaur

Duroli

489 354 181 173 135 45 90

75 Pithoragarh Tulakhand 220 143 84 59 77 16 61

76 Pithoragarh Sibana 49 38 20 18 11 4 7

77 Pithoragarh Sugari 580 376 199 177 204 63 141

78 Pithoragarh Busail 500 324 172 152 176 54 122

79 Pithoragarh Garali 21 53 68 85 43 42 36

80 Pithoragarh Anwala

Talla Malla

Sugar

Mavla

196 105 63 42 91 32 59

81 Pithoragarh Sauli 70 51 22 29 19 8 11

82 Pithoragarh Dhajari

83 Pithoragarh Diyuri 82 61 38 23 21 6 15

84 Pithoragarh Suwal 82 55 33 22 27 4 23

85 Pithoragarh Tallisar 383 267 159 108 116 34 82

86 Pithoragarh Khati

Gaon

646 391 222 169 255 81 174

87 Pithoragarh Garali 452 274 151 123 178 62 116

88 Almora Nali Talli 415 249 126 123 166 45 121

89 Almora Umer 92 54 26 28 38 18 20

90 Almora Bamouri

Khalsa

100 65 39 26 35 9 26

91 Almora Ara Salpar 1128 725 365 360 403 135 268

92 Almora Kola 249 176 90 86 73 22 51

93 Almora Malar 306 181 96 85 125 35 90



S.

No

District Village

Name

To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Po

pu

lati

on

Lit

era

te

Ma

le

Lit

era

te

Fem

ale

Lit

era

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Illite

rate

Ma

le

Illite

rate

Fem

ale

Illite

rate

94 Almora Mayoli 218 129 64 65 89 37 52

95 Almora Dewalsiri 263 159 94 65 104 33 71

96 Almora Dasoli

Badiyar

1184 684 383 301 500 161 339

97 Almora Kuna

Pokhari

165 94 59 35 71 26 45

98 Almora Uncha

Bauragunt

h

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

99 Almora Bali Khet 318 212 109 103 106 22 84

100 Almora Nali Malli 554 287 161 126 267 98 169

101 Almora Ghura

lagga tak

221 146 74 72 75 15 60

102 Almora Birkola 319 211 102 109 108 24 84

103 Almora Dhankana 50 30 19 11 20 4 16

104 Almora Melta 51 28 15 13 23 7 16

105 Almora Nayal

Dhura

212 132 84 48 80 30 50

106 Almora Padoli 74 46 22 24 28 11 17

107 Almora Jingal 236 166 99 67 70 25 45

108 Almora Chimkholi 115 59 29 30 56 14 42

109 Champawat Betta 133 67 36 31 66 25 41

110 Champawat Sulan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

111 Champawat Netra 174 124 74 50 50 15 35

112 Champawat Sugar

Khal

555 341 204 137 214 63 151

113 Champawat Batauri 587 374 228 146 213 77 136

114 Champawat Kothera 371 255 144 111 116 41 75

115 Champawat Sigda 772 537 338 199 235 75 160

116 Champawat Bruyuri 194 126 64 62 68 18 50

117 Champawat Gaika

Jyula

164 94 57 37 70 22 48


Talla

239 123 73 50 116 36 80

119 Champawat Bibli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

120 Champawat Simalkhet 31 29 21 8 2 0 2


Malla

378 215 118 97 163 51 112

122 Champawat Choolgaon 279 214 120 94 65 22 43

123 Champawat Raighaon 1257 757 472 285 500 147 353



S.

No

District Village

Name

To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

Po

pu

lati

on

Lit

era

te

Ma

le

Lit

era

te

Fem

ale

Lit

era

te

Po

pu

lati

on

Illite

rate

Ma

le

Illite

rate

Fem

ale

Illite

rate

Subtotal

(A)

4

9666

3

2600

1

8406

1

4294

1

7041

5

742

1

1334

RUPALI GAD RDP

124 Champawat Bachkot 319 158 87 71 161 57 104

125 Champawat Polap 289 162 87 75 127 41 86

126 Champawat Nidil 373 222 116 106 151 44 107

127 Champawat Jindi

Sorari

84 40 30 10 44 16 28

128 Champawat Bagauti 446 286 170 116 160 48 112

129 Champawat Dungraleti 866 373 221 152 493 148 345

130 Champawat Pasam 546 289 181 108 257 71 186

131 Champawat Aslad 223 106 61 45 117 47 70

132 Champawat Jamarsaw

n

189 91 43 48 98 36 62

133 Champawat Matiyani 895 410 239 171 485 142 343

134 Champawat Chilniya 592 385 231 154 207 67 140

Subtotal

(B)

4822 2522 1466 1056 2300 717 1583

Total(A+B) 5448

8

3512

2

1987

2

1535

0

1934

1

645

9

1291

7

Source: 2011 Census

Figure-3.3: Literacy Profile of the Study Area Villages

3.2.4 Occupational Profile

In economic development of the region its geographical location, natural

resources, business and employment, industries and manpower play vital role.

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000

MALE LITERATE

FEMALE LITERATE

POPULATION ILLITERATE

18406

14294

17041

1466

1056

2300

Rupaligad RDP Pancheshwar MPDP



The occupational profile of the villages is given in Table-3.4. The Occupational

Profile of Study Area Villages is depicted in Figure-3.4.The total working

population in the area constitutes for 49.5% and dependent population or non-

workers in the villages are 50.5% of the total population. It is further observed

that 62.3% of the total working population falls under main worker category.

The marginal workers account for about 37.7% of the total working population.

Table-3.4: Occupational Profile of Study Area Villages

S.

No

District Village Name

To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Wo

rkin

g

Po

pu

lati

on

Ma

in

Wo

rke

rs

Ma

rgin

al

Wo

rke

rs

No

n

Wo

rke

rs

PANCHESHWAR

MPDP

1 Pithoragarh Nisani 711 270 135 135 441

2 Pithoragarh Gogana 1457 753 535 218 704

3 Pithoragarh Rari Khunti 175 120 7 113 55

4 Pithoragarh Jamrari 686 321 238 83 365

5 Pithoragarh Kharku Bhalya 174 121 14 107 53

6 Pithoragarh Matiyal 186 44 8 36 142

7 Pithoragarh Bhalya 0 0 0 0 0

8 Pithoragarh Upertola 0 0 0 0 0

9 Pithoragarh Poli Palchaura 224 112 103 9 112

10 Pithoragarh Salla 1113 565 407 158 548

11 Pithoragarh Sail 1020 595 512 83 425

12 Pithoragarh Taramiya 554 244 216 28 310

13 Pithoragarh Haldu(Soniya) 401 193 191 2 208

14 Pithoragarh Kwerali 547 307 230 77 240

15 Pithoragarh Sakun 377 163 132 31 214

16 Pithoragarh Dhyarh 162 75 72 3 87

17 Pithoragarh Kuteri 0 0 0 0 0

18 Pithoragarh Tarigaon 168 99 97 2 69

19 Pithoragarh Gyal Pipali 128 66 65 1 62

20 Pithoragarh Baun Kote 63 37 27 10 26

21 Pithoragarh Basaur Mainan 185 100 79 21 85

22 Pithoragarh Baltari 360 208 204 4 152

23 Pithoragarh Gaurihat 895 415 334 81 480

24 Pithoragarh Rajyoura 205 42 1 41 163

25 Pithoragarh Kanari 286 171 10 161 115

26 Pithoragarh Majirkanda 2404 1110 935 175 1294

27 Pithoragarh Gethi Gara 356 189 187 2 167

28 Pithoragarh Bhateri 1152 653 632 21 499

29 Pithoragarh Amatari 157 70 57 13 87



S.

No


To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Wo

rkin

g

Po

pu

lati

on

Ma

in

Wo

rke

rs

Ma

rgin

al

Wo

rke

rs

No

n

Wo

rke

rs

30 Pithoragarh Ranuwa 143 74 58 16 69

31 Pithoragarh Bathauli 506 98 53 45 408

32 Pithoragarh Dyora 624 277 223 54 347

33 Pithoragarh Sunkholi 148 109 105 4 39

34 Pithoragarh Pant Sera 388 322 319 3 66

35 Pithoragarh Syuwan 248 111 38 73 137

36 Pithoragarh Dwali Sera 624 307 65 242 317

37 Pithoragarh Ghigharani 328 166 10 156 162

38 Pithoragarh Sailoni 385 172 165 7 213

39 Pithoragarh Chamtoli 58 29 2 27 29

40 Pithoragarh Titari 523 248 40 208 275

41 Pithoragarh Bagari Hat 473 239 183 56 234

42 Pithoragarh Bheliya 243 164 161 3 79

43 Pithoragarh Jogyura 162 83 82 1 79

44 Pithoragarh Garjiya 295 57 14 43 238

45 Pithoragarh Jamtari 130 69 56 13 61

46 Pithoragarh Oltari 369 185 98 87 184

47 Pithoragarh Daulani 37 25 16 9 12

48 Pithoragarh Toli 1701 1039 649 390 662

49 Pithoragarh Tham 58 41 20 21 17

50 Pithoragarh Duti Bagad 1599 1037 741 296 562

51 Pithoragarh Dhunga Toli 1025 521 436 85 504

52 Pithoragarh Kimkhola 252 116 43 73 136

53 Pithoragarh Bokata 547 185 79 106 362

54 Pithoragarh Bungli Gunth 1404 668 655 13 736

55 Pithoragarh Bursum Bari 712 362 336 26 350

56 Pithoragarh Dhandadhar 0 0 0 0 0

57 Pithoragarh Dubola Bitola 224 111 17 94 113

58 Pithoragarh Quinar 39 18 16 2 21

59 Pithoragarh Kuntola 1125 742 392 350 383

60 Pithoragarh Tudil 84 43 1 42 41

61 Pithoragarh Nali 712 362 202 160 350

62 Pithoragarh Sera Ghara 104 72 8 64 32

63 Pithoragarh Sinoli Bhawalta 79 41 1 40 38

64 Pithoragarh Jartola 114 58 0 58 56

65 Pithoragarh Rasyun 196 114 96 18 82

66 Pithoragarh Kharkoli 206 108 90 18 98

67 Pithoragarh Askora 256 119 88 31 137

68 Pithoragarh Pali 390 300 127 173 90



S.

No


To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Wo

rkin

g

Po

pu

lati

on

Ma

in

Wo

rke

rs

Ma

rgin

al

Wo

rke

rs

No

n

Wo

rke

rs

69 Pithoragarh Raitola 169 102 102 0 67

70 Pithoragarh Rautara 0 0 0 0 0

71 Pithoragarh Cham Dungara

Timta

1409 754 369 385 655

72 Pithoragarh Damde Or 894 389 30 359 505

73 Pithoragarh Duni 1250 485 388 97 765

74 Pithoragarh Chaur Duroli 489 206 26 180 283

75 Pithoragarh Tulakhand 220 107 48 59 113

76 Pithoragarh Sibana 49 25 25 0 24

77 Pithoragarh Sugari 580 274 21 253 306

78 Pithoragarh Busail 500 114 114 0 386

79 Pithoragarh Garali 121 60 0 60 61

80 Pithoragarh Anwala Talla Malla

Sugar Mavla

196 94 22 72 102

81 Pithoragarh Sauli 70 30 30 0 40

82 Pithoragarh Dhajari 0 0 0 0 0

83 Pithoragarh Diyuri 82 41 38 3 41

84 Pithoragarh Suwal 82 54 18 36 28

85 Pithoragarh Tallisar 383 335 173 162 48

86 Pithoragarh Khati Gaon 646 332 309 23 314

87 Pithoragarh Garali 452 265 200 65 187

88 Almora Nali Talli 415 191 49 142 224

89 Almora Umer 92 31 28 3 61

90 Almora Bamouri Khalsa 100 49 9 40 51

91 Almora Ara Salpar 1128 583 380 203 545

92 Almora Kola 249 139 2 137 110

93 Almora Malar 306 160 160 0 146

94 Almora Mayoli 218 105 61 44 113

95 Almora Dewalsiri 263 133 115 18 130

96 Almora Dasoli Badiyar 1184 548 277 271 636

97 Almora Kuna Pokhari 165 102 91 11 63

98 Almora Uncha Bauragunth 0 0 0 0 0

99 Almora Bali Khet 318 182 160 22 136

100 Almora Nali Malli 554 253 21 232 301

101 Almora Ghura lagga tak 221 124 122 2 97

102 Almora Birkola 319 160 156 4 159

103 Almora Dhankana 50 36 26 10 14

104 Almora Melta 367 223 3 220 144

105 Almora Nayal Dhura 212 146 126 20 66



S.

No


To

tal

Po

pu

lati

on

To

tal

Wo

rkin

g

Po

pu

lati

on

Ma

in

Wo

rke

rs

Ma

rgin

al

Wo

rke

rs

No

n

Wo

rke

rs

106 Almora Padoli 74 36 25 11 38

107 Almora Jingal 236 129 22 107 107

108 Almora Chimkholi 115 71 71 0 44

109 Champawat Betta 133 63 5 58 70

110 Champawat Sulan 0 0 0 0 0

111 Champawat Netra 174 109 54 55 65

112 Champawat Sugar Khal 555 151 149 2 404

113 Champawat Batauri 587 136 92 44 451

114 Champawat Kothera 371 276 128 148 95

115 Champawat Sigda 772 243 173 70 529

116 Champawat Bruyuri 194 114 24 90 80

117 Champawat Gaika Jyula 164 80 21 59 84

118 Champawat Khai Kot Talla 239 111 3 108 128

119 Champawat Bibli 0 0 0 0 0

120 Champawat Simalkhet 31 5 2 3 26

121 Champawat Khai Kot Malla 378 180 12 168 198

122 Champawat Choolgaon 279 68 64 4 211

123 Champawat Raighaon 1257 546 192 354 711

Subtotal (A) 49969 24985 15849 9136 24984

124 Champawat Bachkot 319 94 94 0 225

125 Champawat Polap 289 119 117 2 170

126 Champawat Nidil 373 207 7 200 166

127 Champawat Jindi Sorari 84 39 3 36 45

128 Champawat Bagauti 446 261 160 101 185

129 Champawat Dungraleti 866 407 252 155 459

130 Champawat Pasam 546 258 10 248 288

131 Champawat Aslad 223 128 84 44 95

132 Champawat Jamarsawn 189 90 79 11 99

133 Champawat Matiyani 895 288 222 66 607

134 Champawat Chilniya 592 242 14 228 350

Subtotal(B) 4822 2133 1042 1091 2689

Total (A+B) 54791 27118 16891 10227 27673

Source: 2011 Census



Figure-3.4 Occupational profile of main workers in Study Area Villages

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Main Workers Marginal Workers Non Workers

15835

9093

24746

1042 1091 2689


CHAPTER-4

DATA ANALYSIS OF SURVEYED POPULATION


Chapter 4: Data Analysis of Socio-Economic Survey Page 1

CHAPTER – 4

DATA ANALYSIS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY

4.1 GENERAL

Most often, development projects are planned based on the availability of

exploitable natural resources. This attracts flow of finances, investments, jobs

and other livelihood opportunities, which brings in people from different cultural

and social background. Such planned activities not only provide impetus to the

local economy but also bring about a multi-dimensional economic, social and

cultural change. Most often it has been observed that such development

projects are commissioned in economically and socially backward areas.

Commissioning of a development project invariably brings about a number of

desired and undesired impacts along with it. The main aim of the of the study is

to provide services for conducting social and property survey for the

Pancheshwar Multi-purpose Project (PMP) in Uttarakhand. As part of the study,

socio-economic survey was conducted for the project affected families of

Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project. The baseline setting for socio-economic

aspects are outlined in the present Chapter.

4.2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES

4.2.1 Methodology Adopted for Socio-Economic Survey

Information for undertaking the socio-economic studies included both

secondary as well as primary data and information. Secondary data was

collected from the revenue department in the form of Right of Records (RoRs)

and Khasra (Cadastral) maps. Secondary source of information in terms of

existing reports, maps and other documents pertaining to the project. Primary

data and information was collected through interactions and consultations with

project affected families in the affected villages. Primary socio-economic

information from the stratified random 30% sample PAFs was gathered with the

help of survey tools, specially devised for this purpose. The primary information

from the sample PAFs was computerized and analyzed to draw inferences and

subsequently a socio-economic survey report was prepared.

A considerable time was spent in collation of information from the secondary

sources. Through desk research and review of maps from District Administrative

Atlas of Uttarakhand, a comprehensive list of probable affected villages was

prepared. In all there are 134 affected villages in districts Pithoragarh (87),

Champawat (26) and Almora (21). The project-wise list of project affected



villages is giver in Table-4.1.

Table-4.1: List of Project Affected Villages

S. No Village Name Impact Status

District Pithoragarh

Sub-district Pithoragarh

1. Nisani Partially Affected

2. Gogana Partially Affected

3. Rari Khunti Partially Affected

4. Jamrari Partially Affected

5. Kharku Bhalya Fully Affected

6. Matiyal Fully Affected

7. Bhalya Fully Affected

8. Upertola Partially Affected

9. Poli Palchaura Partially Affected

10. Salla Partially Affected

11. Sail Partially Affected

12. Taramiya Partially Affected

13. Haldu(Soniya) Fully Affected

14. Kwerali Partially Affected

15. Sakun Partially Affected

16. Dhyarh Partially Affected

17. Kuteri Partially Affected

18. Tarigaon Partially Affected

19. Gyal Pipali Partially Affected

20. Baun Kote Partially Affected

21. Basaur Mainan Partially Affected

22. Baltari Fully Affected

23. Rajoura Partially Affected

24. Kanari Fully Affected

25. Majirakhanda Partially Affected

26. Getigada Partially Affected

27. Bhateri Partially Affected

Sub-district Kanalichina Fully Affected

1. Amtari Fully Affected

2. Ranuwa Fully Affected

3. Bathauli Fully Affected

4. Dyora Partially Affected

5. Sunkholi Fully Affected

6. Panthsera Partially Affected

7. Syuwan Partially Affected

8. Dwalishera Partially Affected

Sub-district Didihat




1. Ghighrani Fully Affected

2. Sailoni Partially Affected

3. Chamtoli Fully Affected

4. Titri Fully Affected

5. Bagadihat Partially Affected

6. Bheliya Partially Affected

7. Jogyura Fully Affected

8. Garjiya Partially Affected

9. Jamtari Partially Affected

10. Oltari Partially Affected

Sub-district Kanalichina

1. Daulani Partially Affected


1. Toli Partially Affected

Sub-district Dharchula

1. Thaam Partially Affected

2. Duti Bagar Partially Affected

3. Dungatoli Partially Affected

4. Kimkhola Partially Affected

Sub-district Gangolihat

1. Bokata Partially Affected

2. Bungli Partially Affected

3. Bursum Bari Partially Affected

4. Dandahar Partially Affected

5. Dubola Birtola Partially Affected

6. Kuinar Partially Affected

7. Kuntola Partially Affected

8. Tudil Partially Affected

9. Nali Partially Affected

10. Seragada Fully Affected

11. Sinoli Bhamaita Partially Affected

12. Jartoia Fully Affected

13. Rasyun Partially Affected

14. Kharkholi Partially Affected

15. Askora Partially Affected

16. Pali Partially Affected

17. Raitoli Partially Affected

18. Rautora Partially Affected

19. Timta Chamdungra Partially Affected

20. Damde Partially Affected

21. Duni Partially Affected

22. Chaur Ghurelli Partially Affected

23. Tulkhand Partially Affected




24. Sibna Partially Affected

25. Sugari Partially Affected

26. Busail Partially Affected

27. Garali Partially Affected

28. Anwala Talla Malla Sugar Mavla Partially Affected

29. Sauli Partially Affected

30. Dhajari Partially Affected

31. Diyuri Partially Affected

32. Suwal Partially Affected


1. Tallisar Partially Affected

2. Khatigaon Partially Affected

3. Garali Partially Affected

Sub-district Almora

1. Nali Malli Partially Affected

2. Umer Partially Affected

3. Bamori Partially Affected

Sub-district Bhanoli

1. Ara Salpar Fully Affected

2. Kola Partially Affected

3. Kunj Kimola Fully Affected

4. Mayoli Partially Affected

5. Deolisiri Partially Affected

6. Dasoli Badiyar Partially Affected

7. Kuna Pokhri Partially Affected

8. Uncha Beragunth Fully Affected

9. Balikhet Partially Affected

Sub-district Almora

1. Talli Nali Partially Affected


1. Dhura Laga Tank Fully Affected

2. Birkola Partially Affected

3. Dhankana Partially Affected

Sub-district Almora

1. Melta Partially Affected


1. Nayal Dhura Partially Affected

Sub-district Almora

1. Padoli Partially Affected

2. Jingal Partially Affected


1. Chimkholi Partially Affected




Sub-district Barakot

1. Betta Partially Affected

2. Sulan Partially Affected

3. Netra Fully Affected

4. Sugarkhal Partially Affected

5. Botari Mug Gunth Partially Affected

6. Kuthera Partially Affected

7. Singara Partially Affected

8. Bruyuri Partially Affected

9. Gaika jhula Partially Affected

Sub-district Loharghat

1. Khaikot Talla Partially Affected

2. Vivel Partially Affected

Sub-district Pati

1. Simalkhet Fully Affected


1. Khai Khot Malla Partially Affected

Sub-district Barakot

1. Choolagaon Partially Affected

2. Raygaon Partially Affected

Sub-district Champawat

1. Bachkot Partially Affected

2. Polap Partially Affected


1. Nidil Partially Affected

2. Jindi Sorari Partially Affected

3. Bhagauti Partially Affected

4. Dungraleti Partially Affected

5. Pasam Partially Affected

6. Ashlad Partially Affected

7. Jamarso Partially Affected

8. Matiyani Partially Affected

Sub-district Pati

1. Chiliniya Partially Affected

Source: Primary Survey

The process of collation of information, such as record of rights (RoR) and

khasra maps, from the Revenue authorities was initiated and completed. The

team was met District Magistrates/ Collectors (DM/ DC) of districts Pithoragarh,

Champawat and Almora, and appraised them about the Pancheshwar

Multipurpose Project, the property and socio-economic study, information and

data required for the study, and requested assistance of the Revenue

Department to share the required information. Subsequent to the meeting,



respective DMs directed their officers and concerned staff to extend all possible

support and assistance. On the directions of the respective DMs, team

members met respective Sub-Divisional Magistrates (SDM), Tehsildars,

Patwaris, Land Record Section Officer and Staff. The comprehensive list of

affected villages was verified and updated and subsequently revenue maps for

the affected villages were collected.

At headquarters, collected khasra maps were scanned and superimposed on the

submergence area map to delineate the affected/ impacted zone. Thereafter, a

list of all the plots/ khasra, likely to be acquired/ impacted was listed down. This

was extensively used to gather Right of Records (RoRs). The State of

Uttarakhand has computerized and uploaded RoRs on their website:

www.devbhumi.uk.gov.in which was used to collate RoRs of the affected

villages. These analyses led to enumeration of affected persons/ families/ land

titleholders likely to lose land, land and homesteads and homesteads only.

A list of affected persons/ families/ land titleholders was prepared, which was

used to identify them in the field for conducting socio-economic survey in the

affected villages. Thus, for the purpose of identification of PAFs in the affected

villages, this list of affected persons/ families/ land titleholders was used, and

30% stratified random sample survey of affected families was conducted.

For the process of primary data collection, a survey team comprising of local

educated youths was formed. It was ensured that the members of the survey

team (investigators/ surveyors) were educated, well acquainted with Hindi

language (as the schedules were to be filled-in this language) and at the same

time that they were well versed with the local customs and language. Training

was imparted to the members of the survey team, wherein they were appraised

about the purpose of the survey and on the method of consultations with the

affected families/ persons and how to use GPS and filled-in the survey schedule.

The survey team traversed the submergence area and dam alignment and

visited the affected villages for conducting the socio-economic survey. Based on

the list of project affected families prepared from the Khasra details, Survey

coordinator delineated the stratified random 30% sample of PAFs. A list of such

PAFs was prepared and shared by the investigators and used to identify the

PAFs in the field and canvass them. A considerable time was spent in reaching

many of these villages. Upon reaching the affected villages, they contacted

the Village Panchayat/ Panchayat member or secretary and appraised them

about the survey work and required information.

At the end of each day’s work the filled-in data checklists were cleaned for

internal discrepancies. The survey team coordinator ensured that the survey




team members eliminated the internal discrepancies and filled-in the missing

information in the survey schedules. The gathered information was thereafter

computerized. This keyed-in information/data was then analyzed and inferences

were drawn using Microsoft Excel computer software.

This socio-economic survey report has been prepared for the entire 134 project

affected villages and at the end of the survey, the survey team contacted 1965

project affected families as part of the stratified random sample survey.

4.2.2 Findings of Socio-economic survey

A total of 11776 families from 111 affected villages were covered as a part of

the survey in Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project.120 families from 11 affected

villages were surveyed for Rupaligad Project. Thus a total of 11896 families in

122 affected villages were covered as a part of the survey.

Religious affiliation

The village-wise religious orientation of the surveyed population is depicted in

Table-4.2 and Figure-4.1. Among the sample population, a large majority 99.53%

of the surveyed population follows the Hindu faith. Only 0.32% PAFs were

Mulsim. For the remaining data on their religious faith was not available. The

religious affiliation of 0.16% the surveyed families is not defined. In the

Rupaligad RDP the entire sample PAFs follows the Hindu faith.

Table-4.2: Religious Affiliation of the Project Affected Families

S. No

Project Affected

Village Name Hindu Muslim DNA Total

Pancheshwar MPDP (A)

1 Nisni 10 10

2 Gogana 39 39

3 Rarikhuti 18 18

4 Jamrari 19 19

5 Kharku Bhalya 12 12

6

Matiyal/Matiyala

Chakwali 6 6

7 Bhalya 22 22

8 Upertola 8 8

9 Pati Palchaura 10 10

10 Salla 20 20

11 Sail 18 18

12 Taremia 25 25



S. No

Project Affected


13 Haldu 40 40

14 Kwerali 9 9

15 Sakun 22 22

16 Dhyan 5 5

17 Kuteri 8 8

18 Tarigaon 28 28

19 Gyal Pipli 7 7

20 Baunkot 14 14

21 Baltari 52 1 53

22 Gaurihat 23 23

23 Rajyoura 18 18

24 Kanari 45 45

25 Majirakanda 53 53

26 Getigada 27 1 28

27 Bhateri 1 1

28 Amtari 36 36

29 Ranuwa 11 11

30 Bathauli 3 3

31 Dyora 19 19

32 Sunkholi 8 8

33 Panthsera 17 17

34 Syuwan 3 3

35 Dwalishera 21 21

36 Ghighrani 19 19

37 Sailoni 13 13

38 Chamtoli 8 8

39 Titri 30 30

40 Bagadihat 27 27

41 Bheliya 1 1

42 Jogyura 12 12

43 Garjiya 19 19

44 Jamtari 7 7

45 Oltari 16 16

46 Daulani 7 7

47 Tham 4 4

48 Duti Bagar 66 6 72

49 Dungatoli 13 13

50 Kimkhola 14 14

51 Bokata 18 18

52 Bungli 20 20

53 Bursum Bari 15 15

54 Dandadhar 10 10



S. No

Project Affected


55 Dubola Birtola 9 9

56 Kuntola 17 17

57 Tudil 10 10

58 Nali 15 15

59 Seragada 9 9

60 Sinoli Bhamalta 7 7

61 Jartola 1 1

62 Rasyun 21 21

63 Kharkoli 19 19

64 Askora 16 16

65 Pali 8 8

66 Raitoli 20 20

67 Rautora 9 9

68 Timta Chamdungra 20 20

69 Damde 13 13

70 Chaur Ghurelli 9 9

71 Sibna 6 6

72 Busail 21 21

73 Garali 12 12

74

Anwala Talla Malla

Sugar Mavla 7 7

75 Dhajari 9 9

76 Diyuri 12 12

77 Suwal 6 6

78 Tallisar 23 23

79 Khatigaon 13 13

80 Nali Malli 27 27

81 Umer 6 6

82 Bamori/Bamori Khalsa 14 14

83 Ara Salpar 35 35

84 Kola 6 6

85 Kunj Kimola 31 31

86 Mayoli 3 3

87 Dasoli Badiyar 11 11

88 Kuna Pokhri 7 7

89 Uncha Beragunth 23 23

90 Nali Talli 13 13

91 Dhura Laga Tank 18 18

92 Dhankana 5 5

93 Nayal Dhura 20 20

94 Padoli 3 3

95 Jingal 20 20



S. No

Project Affected


96 Chimkholi 13 13

97 Betta 6 6

98 Sulan 6 6

99 Polap 3 3

100 Sugarkhal 15 15

101 Batauri Mug Gunth 20 20

102 Kothera 17 17

103 Sigra 17 17

104 Bruyuri 4 4

105 Gaika jhula 6 6

106 Khaikot Talla 11 11

107 Bibil 27 27

108 Simalkhet 21 21

109 Khai Khot Malla 11 1 12

110 Choolagaon 13 13

111 Raygaon 27 27

Subtotal (A) 1767 6 3 1776

Rupaligad RDP (B)

112 Netra 15 15

113 Bachkot 2 2

114 Nidil 17 17

115 Jindi Sorari 14 14

116 Bhagauti 1 1

117 Dungraleti 22 22

118 Pasam 15 15

119 Ashlad 3 3

120 Jamarso 12 12

121 Matiyani 6 6

122 Chiliniya 13 13

Subtotal (B) 120 0 0 120

Total(A+B) 1887 6 3 1896




Figure-4.1: Details of the Religious Affiliation of the PAFs

b) Demographic Profile

Based on the findings of the survey, it is observed that the sex ratio amongst

the project affected families is 853 females per thousand males. The sex ratio

for Pancheshwar MPDP and Rupaligad project is 859/1000 males and

814/1000 males respectively.

In Pancheshwar MPDP low sex ratio (below 800 females/1000 males) was

observed in 58 villages. In Rupaligad, low sex ratio, it was observed in 7

villages. The sex ratio was observed to be between 800 and 1000 in 27

villages in Pancheshwar MPDP and 3 villages of Rupaligad RDP. Equal

percentage of male and female population was observed in Taremia, Kwerali,

Bathauli, Bursam Bari, Sibana, and Sigra, and village Nidil in Rupaligad. In all

there are 30 villages (29 in Pancheshwar MPDP and 1 village in Rupaligad

RDP) where in female population was more than male population. The village

wise details of male and female population are given in Table-4.3.

Table-4.3: Demographic Profile of the PAFs

S. No Project Affected

Villages

Female

Population

Male

Population

Sex

Ratio DNA Total

PANCHESHWAR MPDP

1 Nisni 42 33 1273 0 75

2 Gogana 210 263 798 0 473

3 Rarikhuti 20 34 588 0 54

4 Jamrari 105 82 1280 0 187

5 Kharku Bhalya 48 43 1116 0 91

6 Matiyal/ Matiyal

Chakawali 43 39 1103 0 82

7 Bhalya 51 57 895 0 108

0

500

1000

1500

2000

HINDU MUSLIM DNA TOTAL





Villages

Female

Population

Male

Population

Sex

Ratio DNA Total

8 Upertola 77 61 1262 0 138

9 Pati Palchaura 37 39 949 0 76

10 Salla 20 21 952 0 41

11 Sail 64 52 1231 0 116

12 Taremia 157 157 1000 0 314

13 Haldu 134 129 1039 0 263

14 Kwerali 11 11 1000 0 22

15 Sakun 86 125 688 0 211

16 Dhyan 27 20 1350 0 47

17 Kuteri 24 27 889 0 51

18 Tarigaon 122 94 1298 0 216

19 Gyal Pipli 18 16 1125 0 34

20 Baunakot 38 24 1583 0 62

21 Baltari 88 114 772 0 202

22 Gaurihat 95 76 1250 0 171

23 Rajyoura 59 56 1054 0 115

24 Kanari 131 174 753 0 305

25 Majirkanda 199 195 1021 0 394

26 Getigada 48 76 632 0 124

27 Bhateri 9 6 1500 0 15

28 Amtari 85 121 702 0 206

29 Ranuwa 37 44 841 0 81

30 Bathauli 3 3 1000 0 6

31 Dyora 51 63 810 0 114

32 Sunkholi 15 20 750 0 35

33 Pantsera 5 12 417 0 17

34 Syuwan 6 15 400 0 21

35 Dwali Sera 119 134 888 0 253

36 Ghighrani 115 114 1009 0 229

37 Sailoni 20 49 408 0 69

38 Chamtoli 30 34 882 0 64

39 Titri 83 118 703 0 201

40 Bagadihat 180 170 1059 0 350

41 Bheliya 6 5 1200 0 11

42 Jogyoura 69 48 1438 0 117

43 Garjiya 75 58 1293 0 133

44 Jamtari 14 22 636 0 36

45 Oltari 32 53 604 0 85

46 Daulani 13 14 929 0 27

47 Tham 16 25 640 0 41

48 Duti Bagar 128 201 637 0 329

49 Dungatoli 33 46 717 0 79




Villages

Female

Population

Male

Population

Sex

Ratio DNA Total

50 Kimkhola 91 85 1071 0 176

51 Bokata 34 35 971 0 69

52 Bungli 28 36 778 0 64

53 Bursum Bari 53 53 1000 0 106

54 Dandadhar 3 7 429 0 10

55 Dubola Birtola 58 52 1115 0 110

56 Kuntola 12 19 632 0 31

57 Tudil 38 48 792 0 86

58 Nali 84 73 1151 0 157

59 Seraghara 25 29 862 0 54

60 Sinoli Bhamalta 55 53 1038 0 108

61 Jartola 1 0 0 1

62 Rasyun 200 190 1053 0 390

63 Kharkoli 180 164 1098 0 344

64 Askora 124 106 1170 1 231

65 Pali 21 27 778 0 48

66 Raitola 77 100 770 0 177

67 Rautora 17 40 425 0 57

68 Timta Chamdungra 72 73 986 0 145

69 Damde 57 77 740 0 134

70 Chaur Ghurelli 15 17 882 0 32

71 Sibana 7 7 1000 0 14

72 Busail 44 77 571 0 121

73 Garali 21 38 553 0 59

74 Anwala Talla Malla

Sugar Mavla 26 31 839 0 57

75 Dhajari 13 32 406 0 45

76 Dyuri 25 32 781 0 57

77 Suwal 12 19 632 0 31

78 Tallisar 47 92 511 0 139

79 Khatigaon 17 41 415 0 58

80 Nali Malli 11 24 458 0 35

81 Umer 31 37 838 0 68

82 Bamori Khalsa/

Bamori 30 44 682 0 74

83 Ara Salphar 128 165 776 0 293

84 Kola 14 21 667 0 35

85 Kunj Kimola 43 110 391 0 153

86 Mayoli 5 9 556 0 14

87 Dasoli Badiyar 15 23 652 0 38

88 Kuna Pokhri 13 22 591 0 35

89 Uncha Beragunth 6 11 545 0 17




Villages

Female

Population

Male

Population

Sex

Ratio DNA Total

90 Nali Talli 1 20 50 0 21

91 Dhura Laga Tank 37 55 673 0 92

92 Dhankana 37 29 1276 0 66

93 Nayal Dhura 68 109 624 0 177

94 Padoli 8 9 889 0 17

95 Jingal 37 51 725 0 88

96 Chimkholi 44 60 733 0 104

97 Beta 7 11 636 0 18

98 Sulan 16 23 696 0 39

99 Polap 5 11 455 0 16

100 Sugar Khal 30 41 732 0 71

101 Batauri Mug Gunth 139 163 853 0 302

102 Kothere 45 57 789 0 102

103 Sigra 87 87 1000 0 174

104 Bruyuri 19 13 1462 0 32

105 Gaika Jyula 7 16 438 0 23

106 Khai Kot Talla 32 33 970 0 65

107 Simalkhet 52 71 732 0 123

108 Khaikot Malla 17 33 515 0 50

109 Choolgaon 17 25 680 0 42

110 Raygaon 42 53 792 0 95

Pancheshwar

MPDP Total 5634 6555 859 1 12190

RUPALIGAD RDP

112 Netra 91 92 989 0 183

113 Bachkot 2 4 500 0 6

114 Nidil 44 44 1000 0 88

115 Jindi Sorari 24 40 600 0 64

116 Bhagauti 1 2 500 0 3

117 Dungraleti 70 83 843 0 153

118 Pasam 24 48 500 0 72

119 Ashlad 10 14 714 24

120 Jamarso 60 52 1154 112

121 Matiyali 34 57 596 91

122 Chilniya 20 31 645 51

Rupaligad RDP

Total 380 467 814 0 847

TOTAL 6014 7022 856 1 13037




c) Marital Status

Information pertaining to marital status of the affected population was also

collected. The village-wise details are depicted in Figure-4.2 and village wise

details are given in Table-4.4. Overall, out of the total surveyed population,

single, married, widows, widowers and divorcees comprise of 33.66%,

65.07%, 0.95%, 0.31% and 0.01% respectively. Out of the total surveyed

population of Pancheshwar MPDP the single, married, widows, widowers and

divorcees comprised 33.69%, 65.02%, 0.94%, 0.33% and 0.01% respectively

of the total population. Like-wise, of the total surveyed population of

Rupaligad RDP, single, married, and widows comprised 33.18%, 65.76%,

and 1.06% respectively. Divorcees and widowers were not observed amongst

the population in Rupaligad RDP area.

Table-4.4: Marital status of the Surveyed Population

S. No Villages

Name

Divorced Married Widow Widower DNA Single Total


1 Nisni 0 49 75

2 Gogana 0 352 3 118 473

3 Rarikhuti 0 25 1 11 17 54

4 Jamrari 0 113 4 70 187

5 Kharku

Bhalya

0 64 2 25 91

6 Matiyal/

Matiyal

Chakawali

0 52 30 82

7 Bhalya 0 57 51 108

8 Upertola 88 2 48 138

9 Pati

Palchaura

0 41 2 33 76

10 Salla 0 23 18 41

11 Sail 0 66 5 45 116

12 Taremia 0 166 5 143 314

13 Haldu 0 149 1 113 263

14 Kwerali 0 12 10 22

15 Sakun 0 141 4 66 211

16 Dhyan 0 33 14 47

17 Kuteri 0 44 7 51

18 Tarigaon 0 139 5 72 216

19 Gyal Pipli 0 22 12 34

20 Baunakot 0 41 1 20 62



S. No Villages

Name


21 Baltari 0 183 2 17 202

22 Gaurihat 0 119 1 51 171

23 Rajyoura 0 64 1 50 115

24 Kanari 0 189 1 115 305

25 Majirkanda 1 225 9 1 158 394

26 Getigada 0 98 1 25 124

27 Bhateri 0 9 6 15

28 Amtari 0 170 36 206

29 Ranuwa 0 58 23 81

30 Bathauli 0 4 2 6

31 Dyora 0 85 29 114

32 Sunkholi 0 20 15 35

33 Pantsera 0 11 6 17

34 Syuwan 0 18 3 21

35 Dwali Sera 0 159 4 90 253

36 Ghighrani 0 120

229

37 Sailoni 0 51 2 3 13 69

38 Chamtoli 0 52 12 64

39 Titri 0 160 41 201

40 Bagadihat 0 210 7 133 350

41 Bheliya 0 5 6 11

42 Jogyoura 0 72 1 44 117

43 Garjiya 0 79 1 53 133

44 Jamtari 0 17 19 36

45 Oltari 0 62 23 85

46 Daulani 0 24 3 27

47 Tham 0 20 1 20 41

48 Duti Bagar 0 242 1 86 329

49 Dungatoli 0 51 2 26 79

50 Kimkhola 0 99 1 76 176

51 Bokata 0 42 27 69

52 Bungli 0 54 10 64

53 Bursum Bari 0 59 4 43 106

54 Dandadhar 0 6 4 10

55 Dubola

Birtola

0 64 3 43 110

56 Kuntola 0 23 8 31

57 Tudil 0 54 32 86

58 Nali 0 93 64 157

59 Seraghara 0 21 3 30 54

60 Sinoli 0 57 1 50 108



S. No Villages

Name


Bhamalta

61 Jartola 0 1 1

62 Rasyun 0 232 2 156 390

63 Kharkoli 0 203 4 137 344

64 Askora 0 149 3 1 78 231

65 Pali 0 37 11 48

66 Raitola 0 97 3 77 177

67 Rautora 0 48 9 57

68 Timta

Chamdungra

0 83 62 145

69 Damde 0 77 57 134

70 Chaur

Ghurelli

0 20 1 11 32

71 Sibana 0 5 1 8 14

72 Busail 0 90 31 121

73 Garali 0 45 14 59

74 Anwala Talla

Malla Sugar

0 29 1 27 57

Mavla

75 Dhajari 0 23 3 19 45

76 Dyuri 0 42 3 12 57

77 Suwal 0 24 7 31

78 Tallisar 0 99 40 139

79 Khatigaon 0 51 3 4 58

80 Nali Malli 0 25 10 35

81 Umer 0 48 20 68

82 Bamori

Khalsa/

Bamori

0 48 26 74

83 Ara Salphar 0 161 2 130 293

84 Kola 0 20 15 35

85 Kunj Kimola 0 121 32 153

86 Mayoli 0 11 1 2 14

87 Dasoli

Badiyar

0 38 38

88 Kuna Pokhri 0 32 3 35

89 Uncha

Beragunth

0 12 5 17

90 Nali Talli 0 13 5 3 21

91 Dhura Laga

Tank

0 53 3 1 35 92

92 Dhankana 0 30 1 35 66



S. No Villages

Name


93 Nayal Dhura 0 118 1 58 177

94 Padoli 0 13 4 17

95 Jingal 0 62 26 88

96 Chimkholi 0 74 30 104

97 Beta 0 14 4 18

98 Sulan 0 28 11 39

99 Polap 0 10 6 16

100 Sugar Khal 0 59 12 71

101 Batauri Mug

Gunth

0 176 126 302

102 Kothere 0 65 37 102

103 Sigra 0 107 3 64 174

104 Bruyuri 0 24 1 7 32

105 Gaika Jyula 0 14 9 23

106 Khai Kot

Talla

0 63 2 65

107 Bibil 0 71 38 109

108 Simalkhet 0 87 1 35 123

109 Khaikot

Malla

0 33 16 1 50

110 Choolgaon 0 28 14 42

111 Raygaon 0 87 8 95

Subtotal(A) 1 7926 115 40 1 4107 121

90

RUPALIGAD RDP (B)

112 Netra 0 110 3 70 183

113 Bachkot 0 5 1 6

114 Nidil 0 88 88

115 Jindi Sorari 0 48 16 64

116 Bhagauti 0 2 1 3

117 Dungraleti 0 86 2 65 153

118 Pasam 0 48 24 72

119 Ashlad 0 16 1 7 24

120 Jamarso 0 66 46 112

121 Matiyali 0 43 2 46 91

122 Chilniya 0 45 1 5 51

Subtotal(B) 0 557 9 0 0 281 847

Grand total(A+B) 1 8483 124 40 1 4388 130

37




Figure-4.2: Marital Status of the Surveyed Population

d) Migration Pattern

The information on migration patterns and trend among the surveyed

population were also collected as a part of the study. The village-wise details of

resident and non-resident population are given in Table-4.5. The resident

population accounts for about 84.32% of the total population, and the remaining

(15.68%) is non-resident population (Refer Figure-4.3). During the survey, it

was gathered that the non-resident population had migrated to various places,

and have settled-down permanently or temporarily.

Figure-4.4 reflects that a large majority of the non-resident population has

migrated to various parts of the Uttarakhand, while 42.07% have migrated to

other states, i.e., Delhi, Punjab, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Chattisgarh,

Madhya Pradesh, etc. A small proportion (1.22%) of the non-resident

population has migrated abroad as well to countries like USA and Malaysia.

The reasons of migration from the villages are depicted in Figure-4.6. About

60.1% have migrated in search of jobs and vocations, 28.1% as a result of

marriage, mainly comprising of women-folk, and 4.8% who have migrated to

stay with their family members. About 7% comprising of students, have

migrated for educational purposes as well. A minuscule proportion (0.1%) has

migrated for training purposes.

Pancheshwar MPDP

Rupaligad RDP

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

Divorced Married Widow Widower DNA

7926

115 40 1

4107

9 0 0 281847




Table-4.5: Village wise details of Migration Pattern of surveyed PAFs

S. No Village Name Resident

Population

Non-Resident

Population

Total

Pancheshwar MPDP

(A)

1 Nisni 59 16 75

2 Gogana 420 53 473

3 Rarikhuti 46 8 54

4 Jamrari 130 57 187

5 Kharku Bhalya 62 29 91

6 Matiyal/ Matiyal

Chakawali

61 21 82

7 Bhalya 108 108

8 Upertola 104 34 138

9 Pati Palchaura 67 9 76

10 Salla 29 12 41

11 Sail 86 30 116

12 Taremia 241 73 314

13 Haldu 206 57 263

14 Kwerali 6 16 22

15 Sakun 166 45 211

16 Dhyan 16 31 47

17 Kuteri 44 7 51

18 Tarigaon 164 52 216

19 Gyal Pipli 16 18 34

20 Baunakot 62 62

21 Baltari 180 22 202

22 Gaurihat 123 48 171

23 Rajyoura 98 17 115

24 Kanari 259 46 305

25 Majirkanda 311 83 394

26 Getigada 113 11 124

27 Bhateri 14 1 15

28 Amtari 181 25 206

29 Ranuwa 72 9 81

30 Bathauli 6 6

31 Dyora 111 3 114

32 Sunkholi 34 1 35

33 Pantsera 15 2 17

34 Syuwan 20 1 21

35 Dwali Sera 218 35 253

36 Ghighrani 203 26 229

37 Sailoni 61 8 69




Population

Non-Resident

Population

Total

38 Chamtoli 45 19 64

39 Titri 179 22 201

40 Bagadihat 284 66 350

41 Bheliya 10 1 11

42 Jogyoura 82 35 117

43 Garjiya 104 29 133

44 Jamtari 36 36

45 Oltari 71 14 85

46 Daulani 22 5 27

47 Tham 36 5 41

48 Duti Bagar 317 12 329

49 Dungatoli 76 3 79

50 Kimkhola 158 18 176

51 Bokata 61 8 69

52 Bungli 53 11 64

53 Bursum Bari 89 17 106

54 Dandadhar 6 4 10

55 Dubola Birtola 87 23 110

56 Kuntola 25 6 31

57 Tudil 71 15 86

58 Nali 122 35 157

59 Seraghara 46 8 54

60 Sinoli Bhamalta 101 7 108

61 Jartola 1 1

62 Rasyun 287 103 390

63 Kharkoli 282 62 344

64 Askora 163 68 231

65 Pali 40 8 48

66 Raitola 146 31 177

67 Rautora 46 11 57

68 Timta Chamdungra 132 13 145

69 Damde 113 21 134

70 Chaur Ghurelli 25 7 32

71 Sibana 12 2 14

72 Busail 111 10 121

73 Garali 47 12 59

74 Anwala Talla Malla

Sugar Mavla

56 1 57

75 Dhajari 33 12 45

76 Dyuri 53 4 57

77 Suwal 27 4 31

78 Tallisar 110 29 139




Population

Non-Resident

Population

Total

79 Khatigaon 42 16 58

80 Nali Malli 33 2 35

81 Umer 63 5 68

82 Bamori Khalsa/

Bamori

65 9 74

83 Ara Salphar 244 49 293

84 Kola 35 35

85 Kunj Kimola 114 39 153

86 Mayoli 10 4 14

87 Dasoli Badiyar 38 38

88 Kuna Pokhri 32 3 35

89 Uncha Beragunth 17 17

90 Nali Talli 21 21

91 Dhura Laga Tank 72 20 92

92 Dhankana 62 4 66

93 Nayal Dhura 163 14 177

94 Padoli 17 17

95 Jingal 79 9 88

96 Chimkholi 98 6 104

97 Beta 18 18

98 Sulan 36 3 39

99 Polap 15 1 16

100 Sugar Khal 70 1 71

101 Batauri Mug Gunth 264 38 302

102 Kothere 88 14 102

103 Sigra 163 11 174

104 Bruyuri 26 6 32

105 Gaika Jyula 23 23

106 Khai Kot Talla 65 65

107 Bibil 109 109

108 Simalkhet 113 10 123

109 Khaikot Malla 50 50

110 Choolgaon 42 42

111 Raygaon 94 1 95

Subtotal(A) 10258 1932 12190

Rupaligad RDP(B)

112 Netra 149 34 183

113 Bachkot 5 1 6

114 Nidil 88 88

115 Jindi Sorari 64 64

116 Bhagauti 3 3

117 Dungraleti 133 20 153




Population

Non-Resident

Population

Total

118 Pasam 69 3 72

119 Ashlad 22 2 24

120 Jamarso 83 29 112

121 Matiyali 70 21 91

122 Chilniya 49 2 51

Subtotal(B) 735 112 847

TOTAL 10993 2044 13037


Figure-4.3: Resident and Non-resident surveyed population

Figure-4.4: Places of migration



Figure-4.5: Reasons for migration among sample population

e) Caste profile

As part of the socio-economic survey, information on caste profile of the

surveyed population was also gathered. The project area is dominated by the

General caste group comprising of Brahmins, Kshatriyas (Thakurs) and

Vaishyas, and account for about 83.13% of the total surveyed population. The

second largest group is that of scheduled castes who comprise 13.24% of the

total surveyed population. Backward Caste group constitutes 2.4% of the total

surveyed population. Scheduled Tribe population accounts for 0.15% of the total

surveyed population. About 1.09% of respondents did not disclose their caste

during the survey.

Out of the total surveyed population it has been observed that in the

Pancheshwar MPDP, large majority of the surveyed population 82.47% belonged

to the General Caste, followed by Scheduled Castes (13.69%), and Backward

Castes (2.54%). Scheduled Tribe population is present in very small proportion

(0.16%) to the total surveyed population. Caste details of 1.14% of the surveyed

population could not be established.

In the Rupaligad RDP villages, General Caste dominated the society, comprising

of 94.44% of the total surveyed population, followed by the Scheduled Caste

(5.56%). The village wise Caste Profile of the PAFs is elucidated in Table-4.6

and Figure-4.6 respectively.



Table-4.6: Caste Profile of surveyed Project Affected Families

S. No Village Name Backward

Caste

General

Caste

Schedule

Caste

Schedule

Tribe DNA Total

Pancheshwar

MPDP (A) 0 0 0 0 0

1 Nisni 0 9 1 0 0 10

2 Gogana 0 36 3 0 0 39

3 Rarikhuti 0 18 0 0 0 18

4 Jamrari 0 19 0 0 0 19

5 Khadku Bhalya 1 11 0 0 0 12

6 Matiyal 0 6 0 0 6

7 Bhalya 1 6 15 0 0 22

8 Upertola 0 8 0 0 8

9 Pati Palchaura 1 9 0 0 0 10

10 Salla 0 20 0 0 0 20

11 Sail 0 10 7 0 1 18

12 Taremia 0 17 8 0 0 25

13 Haldu 0 29 11 0 0 40

14 Kwerali 0 4 5 0 0 9

15 Sakun 1 20 1 0 0 22

16 Dhyan 0 4 1 0 0 5

17 Kuteri 0 8 0 0 0 8

18 Tarigaon 0 25 3 0 0 28

19 Gyal Pipli 0 7 0 0 0 7

20 Baunkot 0 5 9 0 0 14

21 Baltari 0 44 6 0 3 53

22 Gaurihat 0 23 0 0 0 23

24 Rajyoura 0 13 5 0 0 18

25 Kanari 0 45 0 0 0 45

26 Majirakanda 2 45 6 0 0 53

27 Getigada 0 23 1 0 4 28

28 Bhateri 0 1 0 0 0 1

29 Amtari 2 29 2 0 3 36

30 Ranuwa 0 7 1 0 3 11

31 Bathauli 0 3 0 0 0 3

32 Dyora 0 15 3 0 1 19

33 Sunkholi 0 8 0 0 0 8

34 Panthsera 0 15 2 0 0 17

35 Syuwan 0 3 0 0 0 3

36 Dwalishera 0 12 9 0 0 21

37 Ghighrani 0 5 14 0 0 19

38 Sailoni 0 13 0 0 0 13

39 Chamtoli 0 8 0 0 0 8




Caste

General

Caste

Schedule

Caste

Schedule

Tribe DNA Total

40 Titri 0 16 13 0 1 30

41 Bagadihat 0 13 14 0 0 27

42 Bheliya 0 1 0 0 0 1

43 Jogyura 0 7 5 0 0 12

44 Garjiya 1 15 3 0 0 19

45 Jamtari 0 7 0 0 0 7

46 Oltari 0 6 10 0 0 16

47 Daulani 0 7 0 0 0 7

49 Thaam 0 4 0 0 0 4

50 Duti Bagar 13 47 9 3 0 72

51 Dungatoli 0 13 0 0 0 13

52 Kimkhola 0 11 3 0 0 14

53 Bokata 2 15 1 0 0 18

54 Bungli 1 14 5 0 0 20

55 Bursum Bari 0 15 0 0 0 15

56 Dandadhar 0 10 0 0 0 10

57 Dubola Birtola 3 6 0 0 0 9

59 Kuntola 0 14 3 0 0 17

60 Tudil 0 3 7 0 0 10

61 Nali 1 14 0 0 0 15

62 Seragada 0 9 0 0 0 9

63 Sinoli

Bhamalta 0 7 0 0 0 7

64 Jartola 0 1 0 0 0 1

65 Rasyun 0 21 0 0 0 21

66 Kharkoli 0 19 0 0 0 19

67 Askora 0 16 0 0 0 16

68 Pali 0 3 4 0 1 8

69 Raitoli 0 19 1 0 0 20

70 Rautora 0 9 0 0 0 9

71 Timta

Chamdungra 10 10 0 0 0 20

72 Damde 0 1 12 0 0 13

74 Chaur Ghurelli 0 9 0 0 0 9

76 Sibna 0 6 0 0 0 6

78 Busail 1 17 1 0 2 21

79 Garali 0 12 0 0 0 12

80

Anwala Talla

Malla Sugar

Mavla

0 7 0 0 0 7

82 Dhajari 0 9 0 0 0 9

83 Diyuri 0 11 0 0 1 12




Caste

General

Caste

Schedule

Caste

Schedule

Tribe DNA Total

84 Suwal 0 6 0 0 0 6

85 Tallisar 0 12 11 0 0 23

86 Khatigaon 0 13 0 0 0 13

88 Nali Malli 0 25 2 0 0 27

89 Umer 0 5 1 0 0 6

90 Bamori 0 14 0 0 0 14

91 Ara Salpar 0 33 2 0 0 35

92 Kola 0 6 0 0 0 6

93 Kunj Kimola 2 25 4 0 0 31

94 Mayoli 0 3 0 0 0 3

96 Dasoli Badiyar 0 9 2 0 0 11

97 Kuna Pokhri 0 7 0 0 0 7

98 Uncha

Beragunth 0 21 2 0 0 23

100 Nali Talli 0 13 0 0 0 13

101 Dhura Laga

Tank 0 18 0 0 0 18

103 Dhankana 0 5 0 0 0 5

105 Nayal Dhura 0 20 0 0 0 20

106 Padoli 0 3 0 0 0 3

107 Jingal 0 20 0 0 0 20

108 Chimkholi 0 13 0 0 0 13

109 Betta 0 6 0 0 0 6

110 Sulan 0 6 0 0 0 6

113 Polap 0 3 0 0 0 3

114 Sugarkhal 0 15 0 0 0 15

115 Botari Mug

Gunth 0 16 4 0 0 20

116 Kothera 0 17 0 0 0 17

117 Sigra 0 17 0 0 0 17

118 Bruyuri 0 3 1 0 0 4

119 Gaika jhula 0 6 0 0 0 6

120 Khaikot Talla 0 10 1 0 0 11

128 Bibil 0 27 0 0 0 27

130 Simalkhet 0 21 0 0 0 21

131 Khai Khot

Malla 5 6 0 0 1 12

132 Choolagaon 0 12 1 0 0 13

133 Raygaon 0 27 0 0 0 27

Subtotal (A) 47 1456 249 3 21 1776




Caste

General

Caste

Schedule

Caste

Schedule

Tribe DNA Total

RUPALIGAD RDP (B)

111 Netra 0 15 0 0 0 15

112 Bachkot 0 1 1 0 0 2

0 0 0 0

121 Nidil 0 17 0 0 0 17

122 Jindi Sorari 0 14 0 0 0 14

123 Bhagauti 0 1 0 0 0 1

124 Dungraleti 0 20 2 0 0 22

125 Pasam 0 12 3 0 0 15

126 Ashlad 0 3 0 0 0 3

127 Jamarso 0 12 0 0 0 12

129 Matiyani 0 6 0 0 0 6

134 Chiliniya 0 13 0 0 0 13

Subtotal (B) 0 114 6 0 0 120

Total (A+B) 47 1570 255 3 21 1896


Figure-4.6: Caste Profile of surveyed PAFs

f) Educational Profile

The village-wise educational profile among the surveyed population collected

through primary survey is the elucidated in Table-4.7.

As per the socio-economic survey, about 16% of the total surveyed population

is illiterate. The remaining population (84%) is either literate or is presently

continuing with their education. Amongst the surveyed population, persons

educated upto or pursuing the primary school level is 22.38%. The percentage

0200400600800

100012001400160018002000

BackwardCaste

General Caste ScheduleCaste

ScheduleTribe

DNA Total

47

1524

253

3 21

1848

0102

6 0 0108

Pancheshwar MPDP Total Rupali Gad RDP Total



of surveyed population educated or undergoing their education in middle

school and secondary school is of the order of 18.35% and 36.14%

respectively. It is evident from the given statistics that the number of persons

getting educated beyond the primary school and subsequent levels drops, and

thereafter increases in the secondary level education. Further individuals who

complete school level and thereafter take-up higher education reduced

drastically. Individuals who are presently undergoing/ have completed graduate

(includes BA, B.Com, B. Sc) or post graduate (MA, M. Com, M. Sc, PhD) level

comprise 4.63% and 1.66% of the total surveyed population respectively.

Further, individuals who have taken-up or completed professional courses, e.g.

Engineering, MBA, LLB, etc., constitute a minuscule proportion (0.1%) of the

total surveyed population.

Table-4.7: Educational Profile of the Project Affected Families

S. No Village

Name

Pri

mary

Sc

ho

ol

Mid

dle

Sc

ho

ol

Se

co

nd

ary

Sc

ho

ol

Gra

du

ate

Po

st

Gra

du

ate

Pro

fess

ion

al

De

gre

e

Dip

lom

a

Lit

era

te

Illite

rate

To

tal


1 Nisni 21 16 20 2 0 0 0 0 16 75

2 Gogana 94 82 206 17 4 0 0 0 70 473

3 Rarikhuti 12 14 14 1 1 0 0 0 12 54

4 Jamrari 46 36 52 1 0 0 0 0 52 187

5 Kharku

Bhalya

20 23 26 4 1 0 0 0 17 91

6 Matiyal/

Matiyal

Chakawali

17 21 25 5 2 0 0 0 12 82

7 Bhalya 19 37 25 4 5 0 0 0 18 108

8 Upertola 30 31 40 3 1 0 0 0 33 138

9 Pati

Palchaura

8 16 23 4 0 0 0 0 25 76

10 Salla 10 6 14 1 0 0 0 0 10 41

11 Sail 23 28 29 0 0 0 0 0 36 116

12 Taremia 69 69 68 9 10 6 0 0 83 314

13 Haldu 67 61 87 3 0 0 0 0 45 263

14 Kwerali 3 4 7 2 0 0 0 0 6 22

15 Sakun 37 48 87 10 2 0 0 0 27 211

16 Dhyan 9 5 18 6 1 0 0 0 8 47

17 Kuteri 13 16 19 0 0 0 0 0 3 51

18 Tarigaon 32 60 64 9 4 0 0 0 47 216



S. No Village

Name

Pri

mary

Sc

ho

ol

Mid

dle

Sc

ho

ol

Se

co

nd

ary

Sc

ho

ol

Gra

du

ate

Po

st

Gra

du

ate

Pro

fess

ion

al

De

gre

e

Dip

lom

a

Lit

era

te

Illite

rate

To

tal

19 Gyal Pipli 7 5 15 0 0 0 0 0 7 34

20 Baunakot 9 20 20 1 0 0 0 0 12 62

21 Baltari 68 36 55 3 0 0 0 0 40 202

22 Gaurihat 24 31 81 11 5 0 0 0 19 171

23 Rajyoura 19 17 60 4 1 0 0 0 14 115

24 Kanari 87 43 134 25 7 0 0 0 9 305

25 Majirkanda 68 73 160 32 11 1 0 0 49 394

26 Getigada 45 19 43 1 0 0 0 0 16 124

27 Bhateri 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 15

28 Amtari 81 25 72 3 2 0 0 0 23 206

29 Ranuwa 28 15 29 3 2 0 0 0 4 81

30 Bathauli 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

31 Dyora 29 26 48 2 2 0 0 0 7 114

32 Sunkholi 6 12 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 35

33 Pantsera 4 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 17

34 Syuwan 6 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 21

35 Dwali Sera 35 44 101 27 6 0 0 0 40 253

36 Ghighrani 59 26 88 28 3 0 0 0 25 229

37 Sailoni 23 5 36 1 3 0 0 0 1 69

38 Chamtoli 6 5 31 8 7 0 0 0 7 64

39 Titri 38 38 97 5 0 0 0 0 23 201

40 Bagadihat 67 69 120 33 6 1 1 0 53 350

41 Bheliya 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 11

42 Jogyoura 11 26 44 10 3 0 0 0 23 117

43 Garjiya 23 36 44 11 0 0 0 0 19 133

44 Jamtari 2 3 19 0 0 0 0 0 12 36

45 Oltari 20 14 39 0 0 0 0 0 12 85

46 Daulani 4 10 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 27

47 Tham 10 11 10 4 0 0 0 0 6 41

48 Duti Bagar 73 37 154 28 7 0 0 0 30 329

49 Dungatoli 14 20 30 2 0 0 0 0 13 79

50 Kimkhola 48 33 60 7 3 0 0 0 25 176

51 Bokata 19 9 18 0 0 0 0 0 23 69

52 Bungli 13 15 23 1 0 0 0 0 12 64

53 Bursum Bari 25 20 36 4 1 0 0 0 20 106

54 Dandadhar 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 10

55 Dubola

Birtola

29 17 40 9 2 0 0 0 13 110



S. No Village

Name

Pri

mary

Sc

ho

ol

Mid

dle

Sc

ho

ol

Se

co

nd

ary

Sc

ho

ol

Gra

du

ate

Po

st

Gra

du

ate

Pro

fess

ion

al

De

gre

e

Dip

lom

a

Lit

era

te

Illite

rate

To

tal

56 Kuntola 2 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 17 31

57 Tudil 17 14 21 6 0 0 0 0 28 86

58 Nali 33 36 52 7 0 0 0 0 29 157

59 Seraghara 9 4 19 5 3 0 0 0 14 54

60 Sinoli

Bhamalta

29 21 35 1 2 0 0 0 20 108

61 Jartola 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

62 Rasyun 93 65 116 23 9 0 0 0 84 390

63 Kharkoli 66 57 113 37 10 0 0 0 61 344

64 Askora 42 40 68 3 9 0 0 0 69 231

65 Pali 18 5 20 0 0 0 0 0 5 48

66 Raitola 26 27 64 15 9 0 0 0 36 177

67 Rautora 20 8 11 0 15 0 0 0 3 57

68 Timta

Chamdungra

36 33 37 5 1 0 0 0 33 145

69

Damde

33 26 33 2 5 0 0 0 35 134

70 Chaur

Ghurelli

8 5 18 0 0 0 0 0 1 32

71 Sibana 0 1 7 3 1 0 0 0 2 14

72 Busail 37 17 36 14 5 0 0 0 12 121

73 Garali 18 11 15 5 5 1 0 0 4 59

74 Anwala Talla

Malla Sugar

12 15 19 3 0 0 0 0 8 57

Mavla

75 Dhajari 5 9 20 6 2 0 0 0 3 45

76 Dyuri 26 11 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 57

77 Suwal 8 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 7 31

78 Tallisar 40 29 50 11 0 1 0 2 6 139

79 Khatigaon 16 0 34 1 0 0 0 0 7 58

80 Nali Malli 12 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 13 35

81 Umer 9 17 19 4 0 0 0 0 19 68

82 Bamori

Khalsa/

Bamori

16 13 20 1 0 0 0 0 24 74

83 Ara Salphar 67 66 93 17 8 0 0 0 42 293

84 Kola 4 4 8 3 0 0 0 0 16 35

85 Kunj Kimola 67 12 54 0 0 0 0 0 20 153



S. No Village

Name

Pri

mary

Sc

ho

ol

Mid

dle

Sc

ho

ol

Se

co

nd

ary

Sc

ho

ol

Gra

du

ate

Po

st

Gra

du

ate

Pro

fess

ion

al

De

gre

e

Dip

lom

a

Lit

era

te

Illite

rate

To

tal

86 Mayoli 3 1 6 0 2 0 0 0 2 14

87 Dasoli

Badiyar

12 12 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 38

88 Kuna Pokhri 8 9 10 0 2 0 0 0 6 35

89 Uncha

Beragunth

7 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 17

90 Nali Talli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 21

91 Dhura Laga

Tank

28 14 28 2 3 0 0 0 17 92

92 Dhankana 20 14 20 1 0 0 0 0 11 66

93 Nayal Dhura 28 27 75 25 11 3 0 0 8 177

94 Padoli 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 17

95 Jingal 22 12 32 1 0 0 0 0 21 88

96 Chimkholi 22 16 60 6 0 0 0 0 0 104

97 Beta 3 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 18

98 Sulan 8 8 13 2 0 0 0 0 8 39

99 Polap

3 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 16

100

Sugar Khal

11 10 43 0 0 0 0 0 7 71

101 Batauri Mug

Gunth

75 47 140 9 2 0 0 0 29 302

102 Kothere 24 10 55 1 0 0 0 0 12 102

103 Sigra 39 45 56 2 0 0 0 0 32 174

104 Bruyuri 10 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 8 32

105 Gaika Jyula 1 3 13 2 0 0 0 0 4 23

106 Khai Kot

Talla

15 16 21 4 1 0 0 0 8 65

107 Bibil 3 9 56 6 0 0 0 0 35 109

108 Simalkhet 25 19 50 8 4 0 0 0 17 123

109 Khaikot Malla 22 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 7 50

110 Choolgaon 10 7 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 42

111 Raygaon 18 10 60 2 0 0 0 0 5 95

Subtotal(A) 2729 2213 4446 591 212 13 1 4 1981 12190

Rupaligad RDP (B)

112 Netra 43 38 41 6 0 0 0 0 55 183

113 Bachkot 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 6

114 Nidil 24 30 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 88



S. No Village

Name

Pri

mary

Sc

ho

ol

Mid

dle

Sc

ho

ol

Se

co

nd

ary

Sc

ho

ol

Gra

du

ate

Po

st

Gra

du

ate

Pro

fess

ion

al

De

gre

e

Dip

lom

a

Lit

era

te

Illite

rate

To

tal

115 Jindi Sorari 7 12 38 2 0 0 0 0 5 64

116 Bhagauti 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

117 Dungraleti 40 35 48 0 0 0 0 0 30 153

118 Pasam 9 6 31 4 1 0 0 0 21 72

119 Ashlad 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 18 24

120 Jamarso 23 23 28 0 0 0 0 0 38 112

121 Matiyali 20 24 21 0 3 0 0 0 23 91

122 Chilniya 18 10 17 0 0 0 0 0 6 51

Subtotal(B) 189 179 265 12 4 0 0 0 198 847

Grand Total

(A+B)

2918 2392 4711 603 216 13 1 4 2179 13037


g) Occupational Profile

The village wise occupational profile of the surveyed population is

summarized in Table-4.8.

As per socio-economic survey, it is observed that out of the total of 13037

persons, about 69% of the surveyed population is not engaged in economically

productive vocation. This group constitutes of persons engaged in household

chores (primarily women folk) and students who represent 25.7% and 15.6%

of the surveyed population. A sizeable proportion of the affected surveyed

population (about 25.9%), that consists of able-bodied adult males and females

that are not engaged in any economic activity, but are involved in assiting in

farm related activities and domestic chores; thus they are dependent on the

working population for its sustenance. This group also primarily consists of

infants, children (not going to school), and aged population. In addition, this

group also includes persons who have retired from service.

About 31% of the surveyed population is gainfully engaged in an economic

activity. This group consists of persons engaged in cultivation (15.82%),

government jobs (4.20%), private jobs (10.50), self employment/ business

(0.28%), artisans (0.02%), political position (0.07%), and labourers (0.03%).



Table-4.8: Occupational Profile of the Surveyed Project Affected Families

S. No Village Name

Farm

er

Go

ve

rnm

en

t J

ob

Pri

vate

Jo

b

Se

lf E

mp

loye

d/

Bu

sin

es

s

Art

isan

s

Po

liti

cal P

osit

ion

EX

-Se

rvic

em

an

/

Re

tire

d/P

en

sio

ne

d

Lab

ou

rers

Ho

us

eh

old

Ch

ore

s

Stu

de

nts

No

t W

ork

ing

To

tal


1 Nisni 9 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 27 25 8 75

2 Gogana 76 22 68 1 0 0 6 0 162 76 60 471

3 Rarikhuti 9 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 10 14 14 54

4 Jamrari 21 1 32 0 0 0 0 0 64 51 18 187

5

Kharku

Bhalya 22 1 8 0 0 0 1 0 34 3 22 91

6 Matiyal/Chaka

wali

14 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 25 6 28 82

7 Bhalya 11 8 7 0 0 0 2 0 32 22 26 108

8 Upertola 16 6 8 0 0 1 4 0 50 9 44 138

9

Pati

Palchaura 10 5 2 0 0 0 3 0 22 22 12 76

10 Salla 5 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 15 4 41

11 Sail 14 1 13 0 0 0 1 0 36 16 35 116

12 Taremia 41 6 28 0 0 0 6 0 60 40 133 314

13 Haldu 49 3 21 0 0 0 1 0 84 86 19 263

14 Kwerali 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 6 22

15 Sakun 20 31 32 0 0 1 4 0 66 40 17 211

16 Dhyan 2 6 2 0 0 0 4 0 20 8 5 47

17 Kuteri 12 6 17 0 0 0 4 0 5 7 51

18 Tarigaon 25 3 7 0 0 0 3 0 4 1 173 216

19 Gyal Pipli 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 3 10 34

20 Baunakot 6 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 31 13 5 62

21 Baltari 78 13 90 1 1 0 6 0 4 5 4 202

22 Gaurihat 14 8 5 0 0 0 6 0 25 14 99 171

23 Rajyoura 15 6 9 0 0 0 2 0 19 15 49 115

24 Kanari 19 11 37 1 0 0 0 0 140 90 7 305

25 Majirkanda 30 12 18 0 0 0 9 0 2 1 322 394

26 Getigada 40 12 28 0 0 0 2 0 23 12 7 124

27 Bhateri 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 15

28 Amtari 28 11 30 1 0 0 2 0 103 23 8 206

29 Ranuwa 9 5 8 0 0 0 1 0 40 17 1 81

30 Bathauli 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 6

31 Dyora 26 4 23 0 0 0 4 0 35 14 7 113



S. No Village Name

Farm

er

Go

ve

rnm

en

t J

ob

Pri

vate

Jo

b

Se

lf E

mp

loye

d/

Bu

sin

es

s

Art

isan

s

Po

liti

cal P

osit

ion

EX

-Se

rvic

em

an

/

Re

tire

d/P

en

sio

ne

d

Lab

ou

rers

Ho

us

eh

old

Ch

ore

s

Stu

de

nts

No

t W

ork

ing

To

tal

32 Sunkholi 4 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 6 11 1 35

33 Pantsera 3 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 5 1 1 17

34 Syuwan 4 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 6 3 3 21

35 Dwali Sera 44 17 6 0 0 1 8 0 61 48 68 253

36 Ghighrani 28 7 12 1 0 0 8 0 39 38 96 229

37 Sailoni 0 4 9 0 0 0 4 0 45 6 1 69

38 Chamtoli 4 7 7 0 0 1 3 0 15 10 17 64

39 Titri 51 21 56 2 0 0 1 0 50 14 6 201

40 Bagadihat 33 19 48 1 0 2 3 0 103 91 50 350

41 Bheliya 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 11

42 Jogyoura 14 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 30 28 30 117

43 Garjiya 12 9 9 0 0 0 0 1 40 38 24 133

44 Jamtari 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 17 36

45 Oltari 12 18 23 0 0 0 4 0 15 8 5 85

46 Daulani 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 3 27

47 Tham 4 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 8 13 9 41

48 Duti Bagar 69 7 23 10 0 0 6 0 66 35 113 329

49 Dungatoli 16 7 2 0 0 0 1 0 24 18 11 79

50 Kimkhola 18 7 8 1 0 0 1 2 37 59 43 176

51 Bokata 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 55 69

52 Bungli 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1 18 64

53 Bursum Bari 28 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 30 31 10 106

54 Dandadhar 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10

55 Dubola Birtola 20 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 39 30 7 110

56 Kuntola 1 1 8 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 15 31

57 Tudil 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 66 86

58 Nali 16 6 9 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 120 157

59 Seraghara 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 3 32 54

60

Sinoli

Bhamalta 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 108

61 Jartola 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

62 Rasyun 51 23 27 0 0 0 10 0 146 96 37 390

63 Kharkoli 35 27 30 0 0 0 3 0 100 56 93 344

64 Askora 32 3 38 0 0 0 5 0 78 29 46 231

65 Pali 6 1 7 0 0 0 1 0 23 10 48

66 Raitola 24 2 17 0 0 2 5 0 33 22 72 177

67 Rautora 15 3 9 0 0 0 1 0 10 2 17 57

68 Timta 35 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 22 54 144



S. No Village Name

Farm

er

Go

ve

rnm

en

t J

ob

Pri

vate

Jo

b

Se

lf E

mp

loye

d/

Bu

sin

es

s

Art

isan

s

Po

liti

cal P

osit

ion

EX

-Se

rvic

em

an

/

Re

tire

d/P

en

sio

ne

d

Lab

ou

rers

Ho

us

eh

old

Ch

ore

s

Stu

de

nts

No

t W

ork

ing

To

tal

Chamdungra

69 Damde 28 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 21 5 76 134

70

Chaur

Ghurelli 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 11 8 3 32

71 Sibana 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 14

72 Busail 22 10 25 0 0 0 1 0 39 13 11 121

73 Garali 1 3 6 1 0 0 6 0 15 11 16 59

74

Anwala Talla

Malla 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 17 16 57

Sugar Mavla

75 Dhajari 5 1 11 0 0 0 3 0 9 7 9 45

76 Dyuri 4 2 9 0 0 0 1 0 31 9 1 57

77 Suwal 2 0 15 0 0 0 0 1 7 6 31

78 Tallisar 40 13 38 0 0 0 3 0 12 29 4 139

79 Khatigaon 5 5 11 0 0 0 4 0 30 3 58

80 Nali Malli 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 19 35

81 Umer 10 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 21 14 12 68

82

Bamori

Khalsa/Bamor

i

8 4 9 0 0 0 1 0 24 13 15 74

83 Ara Salphar 32 9 39 0 0 0 1 0 76 86 50 293

84 Kola 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 35

85 Kunj Kimola 34 27 32 0 0 0 1 0 41 14 4 153

86 Mayoli 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 14

87

Dasoli

Badiyar 16 0 3 1 0 0 2 0 15 1 38

88 Kuna Pokhri 13 2 3 0 0 0 2 0 8 2 5 35

89

Uncha

Beragunth 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 4 17

90 Nali Talli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 21

91

Dhura Laga

Tank 5 2 18 0 0 0 2 0 25 20 20 92

92 Dhankana 10 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 17 20 13 66

93 Nayal Dhura 14 15 20 3 0 0 3 0 42 26 54 177

94 Padoli 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17

95 Jingal 13 3 21 0 1 0 0 0 37 13 88

96 Chimkholi 27 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 50 18 104

97 Beta 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 18



S. No Village Name

Farm

er

Go

ve

rnm

en

t J

ob

Pri

vate

Jo

b

Se

lf E

mp

loye

d/

Bu

sin

es

s

Art

isan

s

Po

liti

cal P

osit

ion

EX

-Se

rvic

em

an

/

Re

tire

d/P

en

sio

ne

d

Lab

ou

rers

Ho

us

eh

old

Ch

ore

s

Stu

de

nts

No

t W

ork

ing

To

tal

98 Sulan 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 31 39

99 Polap 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 2 4 16

100 Sugar Khal 13 5 12 0 0 0 4 0 31 2 4 71

101

Batauri Mug

Gunth 48 7 34 4 0 0 7 0 87 70 45 302

102 Kothere 23 2 11 0 0 0 5 0 37 11 13 102

Sigra 39 4 10 0 0 0 2 0 51 56 12 174

103 Bruyuri 5 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 11 4 7 32

Gaika Jyula 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 23

104 Khai Kot Talla 23 1 2 0 0 0 8 0 27 4 65

Bibil 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 109

105 Simalkhet 23 2 10 1 0 1 1 0 35 17 33 123

Khaikot Malla 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 32 50

106 Choolgaon 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 5 8 42

111 Raygaon 36 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 18 4 34 95

Subtotal(A) 1904 529 1315 36 2 9 208 4

313

6 1941 3102 12186

Rupaligad

RDP (B)

112 Netra 30 5 17 0 0 0 5 0 70 29 27 183

113 Bachkot 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 6

114 Nidil 17 6 0 0 0 0 7 0 42 16 88

115 Jindi Sorari 13 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 12 1 30 64

116 Bhagauti 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3

117 Dungraleti 25 1 13 0 0 0 1 0 19 12 82 153

118 Pasam 18 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 53 72

119 Ashlad 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 16 24

120 Jamarso 18 1 9 0 0 0 2 0 31 26 25 112

121 Matiyali 10 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 23 29 16 91

122 Chilniya 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 15 51

Subtotal(B) 158 19 54 0 0 0 17 0 217 100 282 847

Grand Total

(A+B) 2062 548 1369 36 2 9 225 4 3353 2041 3384 13033




h) Economic Profile

The maximum number of PAFs are cultivators. A large number of the survey of

affected population are engaged in various government and private jobs, yet

they are still dependent on cultivation. Agriculture not only provides vocation

and food to the PAFs, but it’s a way of life. Farming is mainly done along

terraces.

The main crops grown in the area includes wheat, paddy, maize, maduwa,

pulses, and green vegetables. Farmers use both chemical fertilizers and

cow dung as manure to increase productivity of their plots of land. In villages

which are abundant with water or have streams flowing through the village,

there the farmers constructed contour canals (kiuls) to provide irrigation. Most

of the farmers depend on the rains for irrigation. The produce was used by the

farmers for subsistence, which lasted them anywhere between 6 to 8 months

in a year. Thereafter, they purchased food grains and vegetables from the

market.

i) Livestock Rearing Pattern

Cultivation is the main livelihood that sustains people in the project area. Apart

from cultivation, livestock rearing is the major occupation. Livestock are

reared for milk, meat, eggs and labour. Goats are the dominant livestock by

the affected population, as these are less expensive to maintain and provide

milk and meat. Cows and buffaloes together are the second dominant livestock

reared by the PAFs, which is essentially for its milk and progeny. On an

average, there are about 2 milch animals per family among the surveyed PAFs.

Bullocks and he-buffaloes are reared as beasts of burden, mainly utilized in

farm activities e.g. ploughing, leveling and threshing of crops; they account for

about 12% of the total livestock. Other beasts of burden, viz., horse and

mules are reared by a few PAFs that account for 1.3% of the total livestock

heads. Pigs are also reared, albeit by very few PAFs. Chicken and other

poultry birds were reared by almost all PAFs.

j) Housing Details

Information regarding Housing details was also collected from the affected

families during the socio-economic survey. It was found that no family was

house-less. Mixed layout of housing was observed in the villages. The

settlements ranged from dispersed to compact. Linear settlement (on either

sides of a village lane) was observed in few villages. This residential unit

served the purpose of housing families of sons and grandsons, shelter for

cattle, storage areas for fuel wood, and other material possessions of these

families.



It was observed that the houses on an average had about 4 rooms. Stone,

brick and mud were used to build the walls of the houses, while the roof was

mostly made of wood and tiles.

It was observed that about 60% of the houses had a defined space for housing

cattle. About 4.6% of the cattle sheds were electrified. On an average,

there is about one room for housing cattle.

A small percentage of the houses had provision for separate bath room and

toilet facilities. Otherwise, it was observed that most of the residents used

village ponds or river for bathing, washing and cleaning purposes. Most of the

villages did not have drainage system.

k) Sources of Drinking Water

Tap water supply forms the largest source for the surveyed PAFs. Usually, a

storage tank is constructed near a source, generally on a height and

distributed under gravity through pipeline. Taps are installed at vantage points

to supply water for meeting drinking and other uses. Apart from tapped water

supply, the other sources of water include hand pumps, and tanks/ ponds. The

residents of the project area also depend on the river for water. Springs also

are sources of water for various uses. The main source of water for the affected

population is depicted in Figure-4.8.

Large majority of the sources of water are located near homesteads that served

a few to several homesteads in the village. About 36% of the sources of water

supply were within the homestead premises. A few of the sources were located

within the village, but at a common place, from where residents could use it.

The sources of drinking water for surveyed PAFs are depicted in Figure-4.7.

The distance of the source of water for surveyed PAFs is depicted in Figure-

4.8.



Figure-4.7: Source of Drinking Water amongst PAFs

Figure-4.8: Distance for Source of Drinking Water

l) Power Supply

The surveyed project affected Families use various energy sources for power

supply in the homestead. The main source of power supply for lighting in

the homesteads is electricity. A large majority of the affected homesteads

are electrified. About 96% of the homesteads get electricity for lighting

purposes. In addition, the affected sample population also depends on

kerosene for lighting purposes. Other sources such as other oils and solar

lamps are also used.

m) Sources of fuel for Cooking

The project affected families are dependent on a number of sources of fuel for

cooking purposes. Firewood is the major source of fuel, and contributes about



98% of the all fuels used by the project affected population. Other sources

such as electricity, kerosene, coal, cow dung cakes and fodder stalks from their

own fields contribute together to a small proportion of 2% of all sources.

n) Physical Health

A vast majority of the project affected surveyed population, i.e., 99.84% is in

good health and is physically fit and normal. However, there are about 21

individuals (one each in villages Kanari, Amtari, Ranuwa and Daulani, 2 each

in villages Sailoni and Tallisar, 3 each in villages Titri and Bagrihat, and 6 in

village Askora), i.e, 0.16% of the total surveyed population who are physically

challenged. All these physically challenged persons were enumerated in the

Pancheshwar MPDP.

o) Material Assets

The socio-economic assessment covered overall socio-economic status of the

surveyed project affected population vis-à-vis ownership of material assets,

which is an indicator of well- being. It is clear that many of the surveyed

PAFs, if not all, own material assets, which include farm equipment, modes of

transportation and consumer durables and electronic household gadgets.

Farm equipment

Traditional farm equipment such as wooden and iron ploughs and wooden

planks for leveling are owned by most of the farmers in the project area.

However, specialized and mechanized equipment such as pump set, tractor,

thresher, seed drill, cultivator, leveler, sprayer, etc are owned by very few

farmers. Two tractors, 6 cultivators, 1 leveler and 6 sprayers were observed by

PAFs covered as a part of survey in the Pancheshwar MPDP area. In the

Rupaligad RDP area, farmers did not own farm equipment.

Mode of transportation

PAFs in the project affected villages own various modes of transportation,

either used by themselves or operated by them for commercial purposes.

Motor-cycles and passenger cars are the most common mode of

transportation owned by the surveyed PAFs. Second most common mode was

bicycle. Commercial vehicles such as truck and buses are also owned by some

of the PAFs.



Consumer durable electronic household gadgets

Ownership of consumer durables is a clear indicator of well-being,

consumerism and purchasing power among the surveyed PAFs. The most

commonly owned and used electronic gadget is the Mobile phone. Fans and

watches were also owned by a large number of PAFs. Other common gadgets

include television sets with dish antenas, refrigerators, and compact disc

players. A few families own sewing machines and coolers for air conditioning

their homesteads.

p) Rearing of Trees

The project affected families rear fruit bearing trees around and within their

homesteads and agricultural fields. Fruit bearing trees are raised by the PAFs

for sustenance, although surpluses are usually sold to middle-men, traders and

in the market directly by the surveyed PAFs. The most commonly raised fruit

bearing trees include mango, citrus such as lemon, orange, kinu, sweet lime,

malta, banana, apricot, guava, papaya, pear, peach, pomegranate, etc. Other

fruits such as apple, grapes, jamun, lichi, walnut, tamarind, jack-fruit, are raised,

albeit in smaller numbers by a few PAFs as well.

Rearing of Trees

Almost all the project affected families are engaged in agricultural activities and

growing and rearing of trees, both fruit bearing trees are quite common among

the villagers. Trees such as Jackfruit, Lemon, Orange, Papaya and

Cinnamomum are cultivated and reared by the surveyed population.

q) Types of Households

The survey was conducted in 49 families for the status of houses owned by

them. It was observed from the survey that 100% of the population owns

homestead. Walls were made from Galvanized form, Bricks, Stone or Concrete.

The commonly used wall materials were Cement, Wood and Mortar. The

maximum number of homesteads had Concrete walls followed by wood. The

material used for roof in the surveyed area homestead is CGI sheet, Concrete,

GI sheet, HN sheet, RCC and Tin shed; maximum households amongst the

surveyed population have Tin shed roof followed by CGI sheet. None of the

households amongst the surveyed population have LPG connection. The fuel

used for cooking in the area is firewood. It is further observed that almost all the

surveyed households were electrified.



r) Skill Mapping

As mentioned earlier, in all there are 134 project affected villages; viz., 21 in

district Almora, 26 is district Champawat and 87 in district Pithoragarh. A total

of 31023 families are losing land and 1308 families are losing homestead. As a

part of the study, socio-economic survey was conducted for 11776 Project

Affected Families for Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project. In addition, 120

families from 11 affected villages were surveyed for Rupaligad Project. Thus a

total of (11776+120) 11896 families in 122 project affected villages were

covered as part of the stratified random sample survey.

As per the data collected from the surveyed population it was observed that

about 31% of the surveyed population is gainfully engaged in an economic

activity. This group consists of persons engaged in cultivation (15.82%),

government jobs (4.20%), private jobs (10.50), self-employment/ business

(0.28%), artisans (0.02%), political position (0.07%), and labourers (0.03%). As

per the analysis of the occupational profile of the surveyed population it is

observed that most of the project affected persons are engaged in the

agricultural activities. The, summary of Occupational Profile of the project

affected surveyed population is given in Table-4.9.

Table-4.9: Summary of Occupational Profile of the Surveyed Project

Affected Families

S.

No

Village

Name

Fa

rme

r

Go

ve

rnm

en

t J

ob

Pri

va

te J

ob

Se

lf

Em

plo

ye

d/

Bu

sin

ess

Art

isa

ns

Po

liti

ca

l P

os

itio

n

EX

-Se

rvic

em

an

/

Reti

red

/Pe

nsio

ne

d

La

bo

ure

rs

Ho

us

eh

old

Ch

ore

s

Stu

de

nts

No

t W

ork

ing

To

tal

1

Pancheshwar

MPDP (A) 1904 529 1315 36 2 9 208 4 3136 1941 3102 1904

2

Rupaligad

RDP (B) 158 19 54 0 0 0 17 0 217 100 282 847

Total(A+B) 2062 548 1369 36 2 9 225 4 3353 2041 3384 13033

It was observed that the resident population accounts for about 84.32% of the

total population, and the remaining (15.68%) is non-resident/migrated

population. There are several reasons stated for the migration of the people

from the project area. Of the total migrated population it is observed that the

population migrated for training purpose only accounts for 0.1% (Engineer,

MBA, LLB, etc).



It has been observed from the survey that there are no professional institutes

like Medical College, MBA College, and Engineering College in the study area.

Hence, project affected families have Traditional Skills like agriculture, dairy

farming and Horticulture. Although a large number of the survey of affected

population are engaged in various government and private jobs, still major

portion the surveyed population is dependent on cultivation. Agriculture not

only provides vocation and food to the PAFs, but it’s a way of life. Livestock

rearing is the next major occupation adopted by the study area population

Livestock are reared for milk, meat, eggs and labour.

Agriculture is the main occupation in the PAVs. On an average, 76.8%

(63.1% among main workers and 36.9% among marginal workers) of the total

working population is engaged in cultivation. A very minuscule proportion, i.e.

2.9% of the working population is engaged as agricultural labourer. Only a

small proportion of the working population is engaged in household industry

work/vocations. However, a considerable proportion, i.e., about 18.1% of the

working population is engaged as other workers. It appears that a vast majority

of this class is engaged in tertiary economic vocations such as private and

government jobs, self-employment and business, etc.

About 16% of the total sample population is illiterate, while the remaining

84% populations are either literate or are presently continuing with their

education. Amongst the sample surveyed population, 22.38% are either

educated upto or pursuing primary school level. The percentage of sample

population educated or undergoing their education in middle school,

secondary school is of the order of 18.35% and 36.14% respectively.

Individuals who are presently undergoing/ have completed graduate (includes

BA, BCom, BSc) or post graduate (MA, MCom, MSc, PhD) level

comprise 4.63% and 1.66% of the total population respectively. Further,

only 0.1% of the surveyed population has taken-up or completed professional

courses such as engineering, MBA, LLB, etc.,

Cultivation is the main livelihood that sustains people in the project area. Apart

from cultivation, farmers and other PAFs rear cattle for milk, meat, eggs and

labour.

Goats, account for 58.4% of the total livestock population, are by-far the most

common livestock reared by the PAFs, as these are less expensive to maintain

and provide milk and meat. Cows and buffaloes together are the second

dominant livestock reared by the PAFs, which is essentially for its milk and

progeny; they account for 19.5% of the total livestock owned. On an average,

there are about 2 milch animals per family among the sample PAFs. Bullocks



and he-buffaloes are reared as beasts of burden, mainly utilized in farm

activities such as ploughing, levelling and threshing of crops; they account for

about 12% of the total livestock. Other beasts of burden, viz., horse and

mules are reared by a few PAFs that account for 1.3% of the total livestock

heads. Pigs are also reared, albeit by very few PAFs. Chicken and other

poultry birds were reared by almost all PAFs.

The conclusion of Skill Mapping are given as below:

Skill level are quite low amongst PAFs.

PAFs have skills related to Agriculture and Livestock

Even in Agriculture and livestock, PAFs are not trained in modern

practices.

As a part of skill development, it is suggested to impart training for the following aspects:

o Dairy

o Beekeeping

o Horticulture

CHAPTER-5

PROPERTY SURVEY


Chapter 5: Property Survey Page 1

CHAPTER-5

PROPERTY SURVEY

5.1 GENERAL

The main aim of the assignment is to carry-out the property survey –

enumeration of properties likely to be impacted due to the proposed

project. This chapter outlines the study approach and methodology adopted to

carry-out the property enumeration the project affected families.

5.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The scope of work for the Property Survey, the study encompassed desk

research, devising survey tools, Interaction and consultations with district

revenue authorities and staff, field investigation, and consultations with local

key personnel such as village-headman and senior citizen and prominent

citizens, etc to gain an insight of the baseline conditions. The main objectives

of this assessment are to:

Collate revenue records and maps for the project affected villages.

Superimposition of submergence area map on khasra maps

Superimposition of Submergence Area and other project appurtenances

on Khasra Map

Identification of the Khasra numbers to be acquired for various project

affected families.

Identification and collate project affected families (PAFs) from Revenue

records.

Conduct a property survey of the 100% of the project affected families

(PAFs), through field investigations

Estimation of the project affected families losing only land, only

households and both land and households.

Inventory of the properties owned by the project affected families,

common property resources like religious places, community centres,

etc.

5.3 STUDY APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

Information that was required for property enumeration was collated from both

secondary as well as primary sources. Secondary data was collected from the

revenue department in the form of Right of Records (RoRs) and Khasra

(Cadastral) maps. Primary data and information was collected through



consultations with village head-man, village elders and prominent citizens of

the affected villages along with the submergence area maps. Thereafter,

through desk research and review of maps, a comprehensive list of probable

affected villages was prepared with the help of Administrative Atlas of

Uttarakhand. Subsequently, during the reconnaissance visit to the project

area, this list of probable affected villages was verified and updated with the

able assistance from officials of the Revenue department. This preliminary list

of probable affected villages comprised of 134 villages spread across districts

Almora, Champawat and Pithoragarh.

Meeting was held with District Magistrates/ Collectors (DM/ DC) of districts

Pithoragarh, Champawat and Almora, and appraised them about the

proposed project, the property, Subsequently, the respective DMs directed

their officers and concerned staff to extend all possible support and

assistance. Thus, on the directions of the respective DMs, meeting was

held with respective Sub-Divisional Magistrates (SDM), Tehsildars, Pawaris,

Land Record Section Officers and Staff, to collect revenue maps for the

affected villages.

At headquarters, the khasra maps collected from the revenue department and

project area maps were scanned; scanned revenue maps were superimposed

on the submergence area maps. This exercise was carried-out with the help

of GIS computer software, which aided in jigsaw fit the revenue maps on the

submergence area map. This process helped in adding or eliminating villages

along the submergence area, based on jigsaw fit, and also to delineate the

affected/ impacted zone, i.e., areas within the revenue maps falling within the

full reservoir levels. Thereafter, a list of all the plots/ khasra, likely to be

acquired/ impacted was prepared, which was extensively used to gather the

Right of Records (RoRs). The State of Uttarakhand has computerized and

uploaded RoRs on their website: www.devbhumi.uk.gov.in which was to

collate RoRs of the affected villages. This information although was

downloadable but it was not editable; thus it was re-computerised for the

purpose of analysis and drawing inferences. These analyses lead to

enumeration of affected persons/ families/ land titleholders likely to lose land,

land and homesteads and homesteads only.

A list was prepared for affected persons/ families/ land titleholders, which was

used to identify them in the field for conducting socio-economic survey and

property enumeration in the affected villages. Thus, for the purpose of

enumeration of affected properties within the FRL, this list of affected

persons/ families/ land titleholders was used to enumeration affected private

properties of 100% affected families. A checklist was devised to gather and




enumerate affected/ impacted properties.

At the completion of this exercise, final list of 134 affected villages spread in

districts Pithoragarh, Champawat and Almora.

5.4 FIELD WORK

For the purpose of primary data collection, survey coordinator put-together a

survey team, comprising of local educated youths. While engaging them, the

coordinator ensured that the team members (investigators/ surveyors) were

educated, well acquainted with Hindi language (as the schedules were to be

filled-in this language), well versed with the local customs and dialect, etc.

Training was imparted to the members of the survey team, wherein they were

appraised about the purpose of the survey and on the method of

consultations with the affected families/ persons and how to use GPS and

filled-in the survey checklist.

The survey team traversed the submergence area and dam alignment and

visited the affected villages for enumeration of properties. A considerable time

was spent in reaching many of these villages, as these were remotely located

and trekking from the nearest road-head was the only means of reaching

these villages. Upon reaching the affected villages, they contacted the Village

Panchayat/ Panchayat member or secretary and appraised them about the

survey work and required information. Thereafter, the survey team along-

with the village leders, emminant citizens and affected families of the villages

located themselves within the village at an elevation of 680 m MSL for

Pancheshwar MPDP and 420 m MSL for Rupaligad RDP using GPS. From

that location, they conducted consultations and physically enumerated

affected properties and structures.

5.5 DATA COMPILATION, ANALYSIS AND REPORTING

At the end of each day’s work the filled-in data checklists were cleaned for

internal discrepancies. The survey team coordinator ensured that the survey

team members eliminated the internal discrepancies and filled-in the missing

information in the survey schedules. The gathered information was thereafter

computerized. This keyed-in information/data was then analysed and

inferences were drawn using Microsoft Excel computer software.

The Property Survey/ Enumeration Report has been prepared for 134

surveyed villages. As per the property survey conducted in the area a total of

14,047.05 ha of land from both nations would be required for construction of



various project appurtenances. Thus, land of the order of 9,058.25 ha and

4,988.8 ha are likely to be acquired from India and Nepal respectively, for

various purposes. The present chapter outlines the Property Survey Report

for submergence area in Indian Portion.


likely to be displace from their homesteads. Project-wise, there are 1283 PAFs

from 59 villages and 25 PAFs from 3 villages in Pancheshwar MPDP and

Rupaligad RDP respectively details are given in Table-5.1.

Table-5.1: List of PAFs losing land, land & homesteads and homesteads only

S.No Project Site Land &Homestead Only Land

1. Pancheshwar 1283 28153

2. Rupaligad 25 1562

Total 1308 29715


5.6 LAND REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROJECT AND PROPOSED

ACTIVITIES

The Pancheshwar MPDP and Rupaligad RDP involves land acquisition in India

and Nepal. About land of the order of 9100 ha and 5000 ha of land are likely to

be acquired in India and Nepal respectively, for various project appurtenance.

Hence, a total of 14100 ha of land from both nations would be required for

construction of various project appurtenances. About 8780 ha of land is to be

acquired for Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project and 320 ha for Rupaligad RDP

respectively. Table-5.2 provides the break-up of total land, project

appurtenance-wise, required in both the Nations for the construction or location

of various project appurtenances and/or components.

Table-5.2: Break-up of land requirement for the Project

S. No. Description of Area’s Pancheshwar (ha) Rupaligad (ha) Total (ha) India Nepal India Nepal

1 Muck Disposal Area 50 17 20 5 92

2 Quarry site Area

a) Clay 500 0 0 0 500

b) Shell Material 150 210 0 0 360

c) Coarse Aggregate 0 0 30 0 30

3 Infrastructure facilities 310 295 20 20 645

4 Project components 100 150 30 30 310

5 Road & stockpiling 70 55 20 10 155

6 Reservoir Area 7,600 4,000 200 208 12008

Total 8,780 4,727 320 273 14,100



5.7 ASSESSMENT OF LOSS OF PRIVATE PROPERTIES

As part of the property survey the total number of PAFs/ land titleholder/

shareholders and the quantum of land each PAFs is likely to lose, enumeration

of private assets was also conducted in each of the affected villages. As

already mentioned, there are 1308 PAFs who are likely to be evicted from their

homesteads. As per the survey shall 1308 PAFs lose homesteads, process of

land acquisition. A total 1563 homestead structures would be affected, of

which, 1537 homestead structures would get impacted due to the Pancheshwar

MPDP while 26 of them would get impacted due to the Rupaligad RDP.

It was observed during survey that some of the PAFs have more than one

homestead structure which is likely to get impacted. Besides, other private

assets were also enumerated, such as lavatories, kitchens, cattlesheds, shops,

tanks, etc. As per the survey, 959 separate toilets, 252 separate kitchens

(Separate kitchens and toilets means that a separate structure is constructed

for these respective purposes, which are located within the homestead plot, but

they are not part of the main homestead structure) and 166 cattle sheds and

likely to be affected. The details are given in Table-5.3.

Table-5.3: Details of the homestead and being affected

S. No. District Name Village Name H

ou

se

To

ilet

Kit

ch

en

Ca

ttle

Sh

ed

PANCHESHWAR MPDP

1 Pithoragarh Nishani 20 15 1 0

2 Pithoragarh Gogana 49 39 7 1

3 Pithoragarh Rarikhunti 0 0 0 0

4 Pithoragarh Jamrari 22 18 0 1

5 Pithoragarh Kharku-Bhalya 59 13 0 0

6 Pithoragarh Matyal/ Matyal Chakawali 56 12 0 2

7 Pithoragarh Bhalya 37 9 0 1

8 Pithoragarh Upertola 14 2 4 3

9 Pithoragarh Pati Palchura 0 0 0 0

10 Pithoragarh Salla 5 2 1 1

11 Pithoragarh Sail 0 0 0 0

12 Pithoragarh Tade Miya 74 21 13 1

13 Pithoragarh Haldu 20 15 12 11

14 Pithoragarh Kwerali 1 2 1 0

15 Pithoragarh Sakun 0 0 0 0

16 Pithoragarh Dhyan 0 0 0 0

17 Pithoragarh Kutheri 0 0 0 0



S. No. District Name Village Name

Ho

us

e

To

ilet

Kit

ch

en

Ca

ttle

Sh

ed

18 Pithoragarh Tarigaon 32 18 9 10

19 Pithoragarh Gyal Pipali 4 1 1 3

20 Pithoragarh Baunakot 6 1 1 0

21 Pithoragarh Basaur Mainan 0 0 0 0


23 Pithoragarh Gaurihat 0 0 0 0

24 Pithoragarh Rajyoura 11 5 1 2

25 Pithoragarh Kanari 47 41 6 0

26 Pithoragarh Majirkanda 94 48 14 6

27 Pithoragarh Getigara 37 21 3 12

28 Pithoragarh Bateri 0 0 0 0

29 Pithoragarh Amtari 35 30 0 14

30 Pithoragarh Renuwa 15 15 0 5

31 Pithoragarh Bathauli 0 0 0 0

32 Pithoragarh Dyora 55 41 0 0

33 Pithoragarh Sunkholi 13 16 0 0

34 Pithoragarh Panthsera 0 0 0 0

35 Pithoragarh Syuwan 0 0 0 0

36 Pithoragarh Dwalisera 92 69 11 3

37 Pithoragarh Ghigharani 0 0 0 0

38 Pithoragarh Sailoni 24 19 0 4

39 Pithoragarh Chamtoli 0 0 0 0

40 Pithoragarh Titri 60 46 0 5

41 Pithoragarh Bagadihat 28 23 18 1

42 Pithoragarh Bheliya 0 0 0 0

43 Pithoragarh Jogyoura 14 13 11 0

44 Pithoragarh Garjiya 0 0 0 0

45 Pithoragarh Jamtari 1 1 0 0

46 Pithoragarh Oltari 0 0 0 0

47 Pithoragarh Daulani 13 9 0 0

48 Pithoragarh Toli 0 0 0 0

49 Pithoragarh Tham 0 0 0 0

50 Pithoragarh Duti Bhagarh 0 0 0 0

51 Pithoragarh Dungatoli 7 4 0 0

52 Pithoragarh Kimkhola 16 12 11 2

53 Pithoragarh Bokata 0 0 0 0

54 Pithoragarh Bungli 4 1 0 0

55 Pithoragarh Bursum Bari 7 12 5 3

56 Pithoragarh Dhandadhar 2 2 1 0




Ho

us

e

To

ilet

Kit

ch

en

Ca

ttle

Sh

ed

57 Pithoragarh Dubola-Birtola 26 12 0 0

58 Pithoragarh Kuinar 0 0 0 0

59 Pithoragarh Kuntola 0 0 0 0

60 Pithoragarh Tudli 0 0 0 0

61 Pithoragarh Nali 0 0 0 0

62 Pithoragarh Seraghat 22 15 6 5

63 Pithoragarh Sinoli Bhamalta 10 5 1 1

64 Pithoragarh Jartola 20 15 10 1

65 Pithoragarh Rasyun 0 0 0 0

66 Pithoragarh Kharkoli 10 0 1 0

67 Pithoragarh Askora 33 5 10 0

68 Pithoragarh Pali 0 0 0 0

69 Pithoragarh Raitoli 32 25 6 3

70 Pithoragarh Raitora 0 0 0 0

71 Pithoragarh Timta Chamdungra 8 14 7 7

72 Pithoragarh Damde 0 0 0 0

73 Pithoragarh Duni 0 0 0 0

74 Pithoragarh Chaurghurali 0 0 0 0

75 Pithoragarh Tulkhand 0 0 0 0

76 Pithoragarh Sibna 1 1 0 0

77 Pithoragarh Sugari 0 0 0 0

78 Pithoragarh Busial 0 0 0 0


80 Pithoragarh Anwala Talla Malla Sugar Naula 0 0 0 0

81 Pithoragarh Dhajari 0 0 0 0

82 Pithoragarh Diyuri 0 0 0 0

83 Pithoragarh Suwal 0 0 0 0

84 Pithoragarh Tallisar 0 0 0 0

85 Pithoragarh Khetigaon 0 0 0 0


87 Almora Malli Nalli 0 0 0 0

88 Almora Umer 0 0 0 0

89 Almora Bamori 28 20 8 0

90 Almora Aara Salpar 26 21 9 6

91 Almora Kola 8 0 0 0

92 Almora Kunj Kimola 0 0 0 0

93 Almora Mayoli 0 0 0 0

94 Almora Dwali Siddi 0 0 0 0

95 Almora Dasoli Badiyar 0 0 0 0




Ho

us

e

To

ilet

Kit

ch

en

Ca

ttle

Sh

ed

96 Almora Kuna Phokri 0 0 0 0

97 Almora Uncha Bera 0 0 0 0

98 Almora Balikhet 0 0 0 0

99 Almora Talli Nalli 0 0 0 0

100 Almora Dhura Laga Taak 0 0 0 0

101 Almora Birkola 0 0 0 0

102 Almora Dhankana 13 6 0 0

103 Almora Melta 0 0 0 0

104 Almora Nayal Dhura 34 35 10 7

105 Almora Padoli 0 0 0 0

106 Almora Jingal 7 10 0 0

107 Almora Chimkholi 0 0 0 0

108 Champawat Betta 7 7 0 0

109 Champawat Salan 19 16 0 0

110 Champawat Netra 68 26 17 2

111 Champawat Sugarkhal 0 0 0 0

112 Champawat Bautari 67 64 15 38

113 Champawat Kuthere 0 0 0 0

114 Champawat Singda 9 2 1 1

115 Champawat Bruyuri 16 8 0 0

116 Champawat Gaika Jula 6 6 0 0

117 Champawat Khai Kot Thall 0 0 0 0

118 Champawat Vivel 24 2 20 0


120 Champawat Khai Kot Malla 0 0 0 0

121 Champawat Choolagaon 0 0 0 0

122 Champawat Raygaon 0 0 0 0

Sub-total 1537 959 252 166

Rupaligad Project

123 Champawat Bachkot 0 0 0 0

124 Champawat Polap 0 0 0 0

125 Champawat Nidil 0 0 0 0

126 Champawat Jindi Sorari 0 0 0 0

127 Champawat Bagauti 0 0 0 0

128 Champawat Dungraleti 3 4 0 0

129 Champawat Pasam 11 11 0 0

130 Champawat Ashlad 0 0 0 0

131 Champawat Jamar Sau 0 0 0 0

132 Champawat Matiyani 0 0 0 0




Ho

us

e

To

ilet

Kit

ch

en

Ca

ttle

Sh

ed

133 Champawat Chilniya 12 16 0 0

Sub-total 26 31 0 0

Total 1563 990 252 166


3 shops and 4 tanks ( These tanks are constructed by individual families to

store drinking water. The tanks are connected with the help of pipeline and

faucet to dispense water.) for storing drinking water are likely to be impacted

due to the Pancheshwar MPDP. It has been observed from the survey that

there are privately owned fish ponds; in all there 4 fish ponds in the project area

of Pancheshwar MPDP. Table-5.4 depicts village wise details of the other

private property to affected due to the project.

Table-5.4: List of other properties affected

S. No. District Name Village Name Shop Tank Fish Pond

1 Pithoragarh Kharku-Bhalya 2 4 0

2 Pithoragarh Matyal/ Matyal Chakawali 0 0 0

3 Pithoragarh Bhalya 1 0 0

4 Pithoragarh Haldu 0 0 0

5 Pithoragarh Baltari 0 0 0


7 Pithoragarh Amtari 0 0 1


9 Pithoragarh Bathauli 0 0 0



12 Pithoragarh Chamtoli 0 0 0


14 Pithoragarh Jogyoura 1 0 0

15 Pithoragarh Seraghat 0 0 0

16 Pithoragarh Jartola 0 0 0

17 Almora Aara Salpar 0 0 0

18 Almora Kunj Kimola 0 0 0

19 Almora Uncha Bera 0 0 0

20 Almora Dhura Laga Taak 0 0 0


22 Champawat Simalkhet 0 0 0

Total 3 4 4




5.8 COMMUNITY PROPERTIES AND ASSETS

As per the data collected from the property survey of community owned

properties and assets. A consultation was held with the village headman,

village elders and prominent citizens to assess and enumerate community

assets located within the earmarked elevation for the respective projects. An

inventory of all such private assets was prepared which are likely to get

affected due to the process of land acquisition within 680m and 420m MSL

elevations. The village-wise details of community properties is depicted Table-

5.5.

As per the findings of the property survey. It is observed that the community

properties such as Panchayat buildings, temples/ places of worship will be

affected. A total of 115 community buildings and structures were enumerated,

which are likely to be impacted due to the submergence area of both the

projects. Of these, 21 are Panchayat buildings and 94 temples or places of

worship.

Table-5.5: Details of community property being affected in fully affected villages

S. No. District Village Name Panchayat Buildings

Temples/Other places of worship

1 Pithoragarh Kharku Bhalya 1 5

2 Pithoragarh Matyal/ Matyal Chakawali 5

3 Pithoragarh Bhalya 1 8

4 Pithoragarh Haldu 3 2

5 Pithoragarh Baltari 1 7

6 Pithoragarh Kanari 1 8

7 Pithoragarh Amtari 1 4

8 Pithoragarh Renuwa 1 5

9 Pithoragarh Bathauli

10 Pithoragarh Sunkholi 1 5

11 Pithoragarh Ghigharani 1 8

13 Pithoragarh Chamtoli 1 3

14 Pithoragarh Titri 1

15 Pithoragarh Jogyoura 1 2

16 Pithoragarh Seraghata 1 5

17 Pithoragarh Jatrola 1 5

18 Almora Dhura Laga Taak 1 8

19 Almora Ara Salpar 2 4

20 Almora Uncha Bera 1

21 Champawat Netra 1 5

22 Champawat Simalkhet 1 4

Total 21 94




5.9 GOVERNMENT BUILDING, STRUCTURE AND SPACES

As per the property survey, a total of 98 government buildings/ structures and

293 installations were enumerated, which are likely to be impacted due to the

submergence area of the both the projects. A total of 3 post offices, 5 primary

health centres, 29 primary schools and 14 secondary schools are likely to be

affected. In addition, there are 1 dug well, 44 water tanks and 2 hand pumps

will also be affected. The details are given in Table-5.6.

Table-5.6: Village-wise details of Government Building, Structure and

Spaces in the fully affected villages

S. No. District Village Name P

ost

Off

ice

Pri

mary

He

alt

h

Ce

ntr

e

Pri

mary

Sc

ho

ol

Se

co

nd

ary

Sc

ho

ol

Du

g W

ell

Wa

ter

Tan

k

Ha

nd

Pu

mp

1 Pithoragarh Kharku Bhalya 1 2

2 Pithoragarh Matyal/Matyal Chakwali

3 Pithoragarh Bhalya 2 2

4 Pithoragarh Haldu 1 5 1 4



7 Pithoragarh Amtari 1 1


9 Pithoragarh Bathauli 1 3



12 Pithoragarh Chamtoli 1 1 4


14 Pithoragarh Jogyoura 1 2

15 Pithoragarh Seraghata 1 1 3 2 2

16 Pithoragarh Jatrola 2 1 1 1

17 Almora Kunj Kimola 1 1 1

18 Almora Dhura Laga Taak

1 1 1

19 Almora Ara Salpar 1 2 2 3

20 Almora Uncha Beru



Total 3 5 29 14 1 44 2




5.10 SUMMARY

Subsequent to the delineation of the affected/ impacted zone, the survey team

prepared a list of all the affected khasra/ plot numbers that are within the

project area. A list was prepared for the affected khasra numbers. Thereafter,

the team collected land records, viz., Right of Records (RoRs) of all the

affected villages. Analyses of the RoRs lead to enumeration of affected

persons/ families/ land titleholders likely to lose land, land and homesteads

and homesteads only.

Project Affected Families


likely to be displace/ evicted from their homesteads. The same PAFs would

also lose their lands as well. Further, there are 29715 land titleholders/ project

affected persons/ families who are likely to lose only their lands.

In all there are 1563 homesteads structures, 990 separate lavatories, 252

separate kitchens, 166 cattle-sheds that would be impacted as a result of the

process of land acquisition. In addition, 3 shops, 4 tanks for storing drinking

water, 4 fish tanks will also be affected.

Community Properties

During the property enumeration, community properties such as Panchayat

buildings, temples, water tanks constructed by the irrigation department for

drinking water, hand pumps, etc were enumerated. As per our survey, a total of

21 Panchayat buildings and 94 temples and places of worship are likely to be

impacted due to the submergence area of the both the projects.

Government Buildings

As per the property survey, a total of 98 government buildings were

enumerated, which are likely to be impacted due to the submergence area of

both the projects. A total of 3 post offices, 5 primary health centres, 29 primary

schools, and 14 secondary schools were enumerated as likely to be impacted.

Water Supply Facilities

1 dug well, 14 water tanks and 2 hand pumps that are also likely to be affected.

CHAPTER-6

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT


Chapter 6: Social Impact Assessment Page 1

CHATER-6

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

6.1 INTRODUCTION

A project of this magnitude is likely to entail both positive as well as negative

impacts on the socio-cultural fabric of the project area and its surroundings. At

present, most of the population is engaged in agriculture. During construction

and operation phases, a lot of allied activities will mushroom in the project area.

It is felt that most of the labour force would come from various parts of the

country. However, some of the locals would also be employed to work in the

project. The labour force would stay near to the project construction sites. Apart

from direct employment, opportunities for indirect employment will also be

generated which would provide great impetus to the economy of the local area.

Various types of business like shops, food-stall, tea stalls, etc. besides a variety

of suppliers, traders, transporters will concentrate here and benefit immensely

as demand will increase significantly for almost all types of goods and services.

The business community as a whole will be benefitted. The locals will avail

these opportunities arising from the project and increase their income levels.

With the increase in the income levels, there will be an improvement in the

infrastructure facilities in the area. The educational, health, social services,

communication, etc. are some of the sectors which will improve greatly as a

result of the upcoming project. The quality of life of the locals including women

will improve as a result of the project.

On the contrary the project will also lead to certain negative impacts. The most

important negative impact due to the commissioning of the project would be

that a number of families would be displaced from their lands, homesteads and

economic activity. Besides, certain impacts are likely to emerge due to inter-

mixing of the native population with the expatriate labour force. Differences in

social, cultural and economic conditions among the natives and labour force

may lead to some vices among the natives. However, most of the deleterious

impacts, which have been elaborated in the following sections, could be

prevented, if timely interventions are administered.

6.2 IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE

It is expected that a lot of labour force will be deployed at the project site during

the construction phase and the total increase in population during peak

construction has been estimated to the tune of 22,600. Together with the work

force many business establishment will take place which will attract people from



other places. Influx of labour population might lead to number of social, cultural,

economic and security related problems. However, it is evident that the local

residents will have an upper hand in the establishments of any business

ventures.

6.2.1 Local employment opportunities

A number of marginal activities and jobs would also be available to the local

population during construction phase. Marginal jobs such as those of unskilled

labour, drivers, cooks, peripheral shops, peons and messengers etc. would

open up for the locals. However, such opportunities would be limited.

The scope for a number of non-project activities, especially in business and

self-employment sector, job opportunities, will increase tremendously during

construction phase. Business opportunities such as tea stalls, eating joints and

restaurants, fruits and vegetables vending shops, hiring of vehicles, Photostat,

internet café, mechanic and repair shops (of electrical & mechanical types),

small hotels, boarding and lodging provisions, etc would boom. It is felt that a

large number of enterprising locals in the vicinity of the project area would reap

benefits of such business and self-employment opportunities.

6.2.2 Construction workforce related influence on social services

(Educational, Health, Communication, Water Supply, Consumer

Goods, and Sanitation etc.)

During construction phase a large labour force, including skilled, semi-skilled

and un-skilled labour force, is expected to immigrate into the project area Some

of the locals would also be employed to work in the project. The labour force

would stay near to the project construction sites. Education will receive a shot

in the arm. The advantages of education to secure jobs will quickly percolate

through all sections of the population and will induce people to get their children

educated. A sizeable amount of surplus generated through labour will be spent

on education.

The labour force that would work in the construction phase would settle around

the project site. They would temporarily reside there. This may lead to pollution,

due to generation of domestic wastewater, human waste, municipal solid waste

etc. Besides, other deleterious impacts are likely to emerge due to inter-mixing

of the local communities with the labour force. Differences in social, cultural and

economic conditions among the locals and labour force could also lead to

friction between the migrant labour population and the local population.



6.2.3 Construction workforce related influence on law and order

Certain impacts are likely to emerge due to inter-mixing of the local

communities with the expatriate labour force. Differences in social, cultural and

economic conditions among the locals and labour population could become a

reason of friction between the migrant labour population and the local

population.

6.2.4 Construction related influence on occupational health, community

health, and Accidental risks

The labour would be vulnerable to accidents, if appropriate management

measures are not undertaken during project construction phase. The

construction phase of any project is rather an unsettled stage characterized by

uncertainties and often disorders. The basic problem relates to management of

large population which migrates to the construction area in search of jobs.

The labour population involved in construction activities may immigrate into the

project area is likely to have different cultural, ethnic and social backgrounds.

Such a mixture of population has its own advantages and disadvantages. The

advantages include exchange of ideas and cultures between various groups of

people which would not have been possible otherwise. Due to longer residence

of this population in one place, a new culture, having a distinct socio-economic

identity would develop which will have its own entity.

The benefits however, are always not a certainty and depend on several

factors. Often, they are directly related to the way construction phase is

handled by the project authorities and their sensitivity to various socio-

economic problems that could develop during this phase.

It is normally experienced that untreated sewage would find its way into natural

drainage system, and is likely to get collected as pools of sewage or it out-falls

into the nearest water body along natural drainage pattern. Thus, it is important

to provide appropriate sewage treatment facilities at the labour camp and at the

construction site prior to disposal on land or in water body. The garbage

comprising of waste materials, e.g. packaging, polythene or plastic materials

are likely to be generated during project construction and operation phase at

the power station. The same needs to be properly collected and disposed at

designated sites.



6.2.5 Improved access facilities in the project area

Development of the proposed Pancheshwar Multi-purpose project will have

multifold beneficial impacts. The immediate beneficial impacts from the project

will be improved connectivity by the road. The improved road access will bring

an improvement of food security situation and overall economic and social

stability. The improved access road will also provide cheap, safe and fast

transport of goods and services from rural areas to urban centers and vice

versa. This will contribute significantly to improve the overall socio-economic

condition of the people.

6.2.6 Impacts on infrastructure

The availability of infrastructure is generally a problem during the initial

construction phase. Though the construction workers would be willing to pay for

certain facilities like health, education, etc., the facilities itself are often not

made available timely and of the desired quality. The adequacy of water supply,

sewage treatment, housing etc. should, therefore, be ensured before and

adequate measures would be taken at the very start of the project.

6.2.7 Impacts on public health due to migrant population

About 8500 labourers, technical staff and service providers will congregate in

the project area during peak construction phase. The total increase in

population is expected to be of the order of 22,600. Most of the labour would

come from various parts of the country. The labourer would live in dormitories

provided by the Contractor. Proper sanitary facilities are generally provided.

Hence, a proper surveillance and immunization schedule needs to be

developed for the labour population migrating into the project area.

6.2.8 Increased incidence of vector-borne diseases due to excavations

The excavation of earth from borrow pits etc. is one of the major factor for the

increase in prevalence of malaria. After excavation of construction material, the

depressions are generally left without treatment where water gets collected.

These pools of water, then serves as breeding grounds for mosquitoes.

However, in the present case, the borrow areas are within the river bed, which

in any case remain under water. Thus, no additional habitat for mosquito

breeding is created due to excavation. The flight of mosquito is generally limited

up to 1 to 2 km from the breeding sites. Since, no residential areas are located

within 1 km from the reservoir periphery, increased incidences of malaria are

not anticipated. However, labour camps, etc. could be vulnerable to increased



incidence of malaria, if proper measures for drainage and mosquito control are

not undertaken.

6.2.9 Impacts on public health due to inadequate facilities in labour

camps

Improperly planned labour camps generally tend to become slums, with

inadequate facilities for potable water supply and sewage treatment and

disposal. This could lead to outbreak of epidemics of water-borne diseases.

Adequate measures for supply of potable water and sewage treatment have

been recommended as a part of Environmental Management Plan outlined in

Volume-II of this Report.

6.2.10 Loss of Historical and Cultural Monuments and Mineral Reserves

The reservoir so constructed as a result of construction of the dam will not

submerge any monument notified by Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

However, about 89 temples are likely to be submerged. Among these

temples, three temples located at Pancheshwar, Rameshwar and

Taleshwar are the major temples which are revered not only by the locals but

also by the people in the surrounding areas. The main deity in these three

temples is Lord Shiva. The temple at Pancheshwar is located about 2.5 km

upstream of dam site at the confluence of rivers Sarju and Mahakali. The R.L.of

the temple is about 450 m. Thus, the depth of the reservoir water above this

temple will be 230 m. The temple at Rameshwar is situated at the confluence of

rivers Sarju and Ramganga. The R.L. at this site is 550 m. The depth of the

water above the temple will be about 130 m. The other major temple is at

Taleshwar along the banks of river Mahakali, about 10 km upstream of

Jhulaghat. The depth of water above this temple would be about 120 m. The

reservoir depth over the above mentioned temples sites are too high (120 m to

250 m) to be protected by engineering structures. Thus, these temples will

be submerged as a result of the projects.

6.2.11 Impacts on Mineral Resources

No mineral deposits are coming under submergence due to the reservoir. The

project and its surrounding areas have little or no mineral deposits.

6.3 IMPACTS DURING OPERATION PHASE

Although there are a number of positive impacts of the proposed project,

certain negative impacts will also be there, which are described in the following



paragraphs.

6.3.1 Impacts due to acquisition of land and homesteads


likely to be displace/ evicted from their homesteads. The same PAFs would

also lose their lands as well. Further, there are 29715 land titleholders/ project

affected persons/ families who are likely to lose only their lands.

In all there are 1563 homesteads structures, 990 separate lavatories, 252

separate kitchens, 166 cattle-sheds that would be impacted as a result of the

process of land acquisition. In addition, 3 shops, 4 tanks for storing drinking

water, 4 fish tanks will also be affected.

The risks involved due to acquisition of land and homestead are given as below:

Expropriation of land removes the main foundation on which people build

productive systems, commercial activities, and livelihoods. Often land is

lost forever, sometimes it is partially replaced, and seldom is it fully

replaced or fully compensated. This is the principal form of de-

capitalization and pauperization of displaced people, as they lose both

natural and man-made capital

Loss of wage employment occurs on account of acquisition of agriculture

land, yet creation of new jobs is difficult and requires substantial

investment. Resulting unemployment or underemployment among

resettlers endures long after physical relocation has been completed.

Loss of housing and shelter may be only temporary for many displaced

families, but for some homelessness remains a chronic condition

Marginalization occurs when families lose economic power and slide on

a downward mobility path middle-income farm - households do not

become landless, they become small land holders, small shopkeepers’

and craftsmen downsize and slip below poverty thresholds. Relative

marginalization often begins long before actual displacement; for

instance when lands are identified for future flooding they are implicitly

devalued, as new public and private infrastructure investment are

prohibited and the expansion of social services is also not done



6.3.2 Impoverishment Risk Assessment (IRA)

In project feasibility and preparation studies, the IRA performs two basic

functions. Foremost, it serves as a diagnostic and predictive tool, to anticipate

risks in resettlement and to assess their nature and their expected intensity.

Secondly, IRA is also used as a problem resolution and planning function, to

guide the incorporation of measures matching each main risk, either for

prevention or mitigation. The IRA identifies impoverishment not only in terms of

income, but also in terms of employment opportunities, health care, nutrition,

food security, common assets, education, shelter or social capital.

The IRA framework has been synthesized from the knowledge of past

experiences, which saves considerable time and effort in feasibility work by not

demanding general risk analysis to start afresh in each project, but rather by

ex-ante offering a well-tested starting point. The matrix of eight basic risks in

light of historical experience, predictable in most resettlement situations:

landlessness, joblessness, homelessness, marginalization, increased morbidity

and mortality, food insecurity, loss of access to common property, and social

(community) disarticulation. Each of these risks is discussed in Table-6.1.

Table-6.1: Impoverishment Risk Assessment

S. No. Risks

involved

Description of risks involved Details

1. Landlessness Expropriation of land removes

the main foundation on which

people build productive

systems, commercial activities,

and livelihoods. Often land is

lost forever, sometimes it is

partially replaced, and seldom is

it fully replaced or fully

compensated. This is the

principal form of de-

capitalization and pauperization

of displaced people, as they

lose both natural and man-

made capital.

The villagers depend on their

lands for their livelihood. In

addition, there are a number

of families that are

dependent on these lands

for their livelihood, who work

as agricultural labour work

force. Acquisition of lands

would invariably affect their

means of livelihood and

sustenance.

2. Joblessness Loss of wage employment

occurs on account of acquisition

of agriculture land, Yet creation

of new jobs is difficult and

requires substantial investment.

Resulting unemployment or

Loss of wage employment

occurs on account of

acquisition of agriculture

land, yet creation of new

jobs is difficult and requires

substantial investment.



S. No. Risks

involved


underemployment among

resettlers endures long after

physical relocation has been

completed.

Resulting unemployment or

underemployment among

resettlers endures long after

physical relocation has been

completed. There are a

number of PAFs who are

dependent on agricultural

land. The submergence of

this land would adversely

affect the job opportunities in

the area.

3. Homelessness Loss of housing and shelter

may be only temporary for

many displaced families, but for

some homelessness remains a

chronic condition.

Homelessness would be an

issue for these families

losing homestead.

Villagers have a special

bonding with their land and

properties which they never

like to part with. The

submergence of the project

will cause displacement of

the Abadi population pushing

them towards forced

transition from one place to

another which may be a

strange place for them. This

transition will cause stress

and unnecessary pressure

on their day to day lives.

4. Marginalization Marginalization occurs when

families lose economic power

and slide on a downward

mobility path middle-income

farm - households do not

become landless, they become

small landholders, small

shopkeepers’ and craftsmen

downsize and slip below

poverty thresholds. Relative

marginalization often begins

long before actual

displacement; for instance when

lands are condemned for future

This aspect needs to be

carefully and sensitively

assessed, as the main

source of sustenance, ie.,

land would be acquired and

thus the main source of

income and livelihood is

gone; the possibility of many

of the PAFs would become

marginalized. As mentioned

there are land titleholders

that would lose land due to

the process of land

acquisition.



S. No. Risks

involved


flooding they are implicitly

devalued as new public and

private infrastructure investment

are prohibited and the

expansion of social service is

undercut.

It is felt that only a few

families/ individuals that

would be able to bear the

brunt of land acquisition. For

the remaining the possibility

of sliding on a downward

mobility path would be

inevitable unless alternative

sources of livelihood are not

provided.

5. Increased

Morbidity and

Mortality

Serious decreases in health

levels result from displacement

caused social stress, insecurity,

psychological trauma and out-

break of relocation related

illnesses particularly water-

borne and vector-borne

diseases.

Unsafe water supply and poor

sewerage system increase

vulnerability to epidemic and

chronic diarrhea, dysentery etc.

The weakest segments of the

demographic spectrum, viz.,

infants, children and the elderly

are severely affected the most.

Fluctuations in morbidity and

mortality rates would depend

on the displacement related

social stress, insecurity,

psychological trauma. Out-

break of illnesses particularly

water-borne and vector-

borne diseases can be

envisaged. But these would

depend on the kind of civic

amenities provided at the

relocation or at the labour

camps, where the labour

would be housed.

Health indicators could also

fluctuate due to the presence

of labour colonies that have

come to work in the plant

construction. Thus it is

imperative to provide proper

civic amenities in these

colonies as well.

6.4 IMPACTS DUE TO COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT

6.4.1 Improvement in agriculture production

The project envisages irrigation over an area of 2.59 lakh ha. With the

introduction of irrigation, not only the irrigation intensity will improve, but also

the cropping intensity will improve. The introduction of irrigation will also lead to

improvement in agriculture productivity as well.



The total agriculture production would increase resulting in increase in

agriculture production. The increase in crop production would also increase the

income level, which is a significant positive impact.

6.4.2 Improvement in livestock

The improvement in the socio-economic status of the population in the

command area will indirectly improve the quality of livestock. The main reasons

could be improvement in the supply and availability of the veterinary services

along with the betterment in the infrastructure facilities in the area.

During project operation phase, food grain production will increase significantly.

Assuming even 50% of agriculture by product is usable as fodder, hence, it

would satisfy the fodder requirements of large number of cattles. This will

reduce the pressure on the existing forests or vegetation of the area, which is a

significant positive impact. The project would also improve the water availability

for livestock. The coupled with improved fodder availability improve the

livestock status of the area. It has been observed in other Irrigation Projects the

number of livestock does not increase significantly. It is the quality of livestock

that show similar improvement. Similar impacts are envisaged in the proposed

Project as well.

6.4.3 Employment generation

The increase in the irrigation intensity in the command area would improve the

employment scenario to a large extent. The introduction of irrigation requires a

greater amount of labour in fields. This would improve the employment scenario

not only for the local farmers, but would also increase the demand for

agricultural labour. On average, labour demand in irrigated and unirrigated field

is 200 man-days/ year/ ha and 100 man-days/ha/year. The employment

potential in with out -project phase for a cropped area of 2, 45,000 ha have

about 24.5 million which will increase to 49.0 million man-days in project

operation phase. Thus, with the increase in the irrigation intensity, manpower

requirement in the agriculture sector would increase by 24.5 million man days

per year.

As per the general definition, a main worker is defined as one who is engaged

in any economically productive activity for at least for 183 days or six months in

a year. Thus, the increased irrigation intensity will ensure employment to about

1, 33,000 persons per year. This is a significant positive impact.



6.4.4 Urbanization

The commissioning of the project will increase the gross money flow in the

command area. This will lead to significant impacts in the project area. The

area will have increased demands for services, such as sewerage system,

communication, transportation, medical and educational facilities, etc. It is

presumed that all these developments would result in generation of additional

employment. Thus, with the increased income level, there will be a greater

impact for urbanization in the command area.

CHAPTER-7

RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN


Chapter: 7 Resettlement & Rehabilitation Plan Page 1

CHAPTER- 7

RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN

7.1 INTRODUCTION

The Pancheshwar MPDP and Rupaligad RDP are located in the mountainous

state of Uttarakhand; many of the affected villages are remotely located and

accessed by footpath, by varying distances from the nearest road-head. A

project of this magnitude is likely to impact 123 villages by the Pancheshwar

MPDP and 11 villages by the Rupaligad RDP due to the process of land

acquisition for various purposes. The deleterious impacts would include

submergence and or acquisition of land, primarily cultivated lands and

orchards, eviction of families from their homesteads, acquisition of other private

properties, community property resources, and government assets. Thus, all

such assets and properties that are likely to be impacted would require to be

compensated. Therefore, it is essential to spell out the loss which is likely to be

incurred due to the process of land acquisition. This would enable project

planners to either look for less impacting options or to take appropriate

measures to devise suitable compensation and R&R package as a solace to

the PAFs.

This chapter details-out the enumeration of various properties and assets that

are likely to be affected due to the process of land acquisition for the

Pancheshwar MPDP and Rupaligad RDP. The Compensation shall be awarded

to the affected population on the guidelines of the “The Right to Fair

Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act 2013”. The details of the private land been acquired is given

in Tables-7.1 and 7.2 summarize the Project wise PAFs losing land &

Homestead and only Land.

Table-7.1: Details of land to be acquired for the project

S. No. Parameter Total Private Land Acquired (ha)

1 Pancheshwar Fully Affected Villages 463.81

2 Pancheshwar Partially Affected Villages 3227.83

3 Rupalgadi Partially Affected Villages 44.16

Total 3735.8




Table-7.2: List of PAFs losing Homesteads & Land and Only Land

S. No. Project Name PAFs losing Land &

Homestead

PAFs losing

Land Only

Total

1 Pancheshwar MPDP 1283 28153 29436

2 Rupaligad RDP 25 1562 1587

Total PAFs 1308 29715 31023


7.2 RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLAN

For the purpose of this project, the R&R plan has been devised using the

norms and guidelines of the “Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in

Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013”. The Consultant

based on past experiences in similar projects, in the area have

suggested/specified/ augmented/ enhanced the R&R provisions. The objective

of the R&R Plan is to enable project planners to take appropriate measures to

devise suitable compensation as a part of resettlement and rehabilitation

package for the PAFs.

7.2.1 MEASURES FOR COMPENSATION OF LOSS OF PRIVATE

PROPERTIES

7.2.1.1 Compensation for Land

Of the total land coming under submergence area, private irrigated land

accounts for 2822.43 ha. About 31023 families are likely to lose land in

submergence area of the project. The compensation for acquisition of private

land would be paid to the respective land owners/ land titleholders as per the

provisions of “Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land

Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013”.

7.2.2 COMPENSATION FOR HOMESTEADS

It is envisaged that this proposed project is also likely to evict a number of

families from their homesteads as well. As per the assessment, in all there are

1563 homestead structures are likely to get affected as a result of land

acquisition.



7.2.3 COMPENSATION OF OTHER PROPERTIES

Other properties such as trees, wells, ponds, temples, cremation grounds,

public utility buildings and spaces, electric and telephone poles and cables,

etc., would be assessed, evaluated and compensation rates would be fixed as

per the prevalent guidelines/norms. The compensation amount shall be

disbursed to the concerned department, agency, individuals, etc.

7.3 MEASURES FOR RESETTLEMENT

There are 1308 families that are likely to be evicted from their homesteads as a

result of the process of land acquisition due to construction of dam and

subsequent submergence area. These families would be eligible to receive

resettlement benefits, in addition to compensation of homestead plot and

structure. The provisions “Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in

Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013” have been taken

into consideration. Further, it is suggested that these families be resettled/

relocated at one place as a group, in one or more of the existing nearby

villages. The provisions for Resettlement that would be extended to the families

losing homesteads are given in Table-7.3.

Table-7.3: Provisions for Resettlement Plan for families losing homestead

S. No. Description Unit Assumed Provision

Cost (Rs. lakh)

Housing Benefits and Compensation

1 a) If a house is lost in rural areas, a constructed house shall be provided as per the Indira Awas Yojana specifications.

b) If a house is lost in urban

areas, a constructed house shall be provided, which will be not less than 50 sqmts in plinth area

c) In case family in urban

areas does not opts to take the house offered, one-time financial assistance of not less than Rs. 150,000/- for house construction

d) If any affected family in rural

areas so prefers, the

Resettlement benefits shall be extended to 1308 PAFs who are likely to be evicted from their homesteads. Thus, a provision of 32.7 ha (1308 PAFs x 250sqm x 10-4) is required for providing housing plots to the displaced families. In addition, about 25% of the plot size would be required for providing civic amenities and

72300.28




Cost (Rs. lakh)

equivalent cost of the house may be offered in lieu of the constructed house

about 25% of the plot size for providing infrastructure facilities (amounting to 36.96 ha) are also required to be provided in the resettlement site. Thus, the total land required for the resettlement site: ( + 36.96) 110.89 ha Cost of land for Rehabilitation has been taken 4 times of the maximum circle rate of Pithoragarh i.e. (1.63 x 4) Rs. 6.52 crore/ha

2. House Building Assistance @ Rs. 1,50,000/ha +. Escalation Factor of 20.9% for Pitoragarh District

Per family

1308 PAFs x Rs. 150,000/PAF x 1.209

2372.06

3. Cattle Shed

One-time financial assistance of a minimum of Rs. 25,000/- or as the appropriate Government may, by notification specify, for construction of cattle shed + Escalation Factor of 20.9% for Pitoragarh District

Per family

1308 PAFs x Rs. 25,000/PAF x 1.209

395.34

4. Transportation Grant

One time financial assistance of Rs. 50,000/-for each displaced family for shifting of the family, building materials, belongings and cattle.

Per family

1308 PAFs x Rs. 50,000/PAF

654.00

5. Subsistence Allowance

a) Each affected family, losing land, will be given a monthly subsistence allowance equivalent to Rs. 3000/

Per family

1308 PAFs x Rs. 50,000/PAF

654.00




Cost (Rs. lakh)

month for a period of one year from the date of award. Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes displaced from Scheduled Areas shall receive an amount equivalent to Rs. 50,000/-, in addition to subsistence allowance

6. One time Resettlement Allowance

Each affected family shall be given a one time “Resettlement Allowance” of Rs. 50,000/

1308 PAFs x Rs. 50,000/PAF

654.00

7. Stamp Duty and Registration

a) The stamp duty and the other fees payable for registration of the land of the house allotted to the affected families shall be borne by the requiring body

b) The land for house allotted to the affected families shall be free from all encumbrance

c) The land and the house allotted may be in the joint names of wife and husband of the affected family.

To be decided by the District Administration

TOTAL 77029.68 Note: Escalation factor for construction has been taken as 20.9%, which is highest among the

three project affected districts, i.e. Pithoragarh, Almora and Champawat.

7.4 AMENITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURAL FACILITIES TO BE

PROVIDED AT RESETTLEMENT SITES

In addition to the resettlement benefits that would be extended to the PAFs, the

following Amenities and Infrastructural Facilities are proposed to be provided at

Resettlement sites.



Internal Village Road Network

For easy movement of people and vehicular traffic within the proposed

resettlement sites, it is suggested to construct a 4.5 m wide internal

village road within each of the resettlement sites. These internal village

roads would be connected to an access road which connects villages. It

is proposed to construct about 25 km of internal road network. An

amount of Rs.1000 lakh is being earmarked for construction of 50 km

metalled Internal Village Roads, which includes all costs, such as

cutting, Leveling, Aggregates, black top, labor, etc.

Drainage Network within the Resettlement site

It is proposed to construct Drainage network in each of the resettlement

colonies. The main purpose of this drainage network is to clear storm

water and domestic waste water from kitchens and bathrooms. It is also

proposed that the drainage networks will consisting of a lined drain and

covered with RCC slabs. These drains will traverse parallel along

internal village road, and finally culminate into a collection tank, before it

is screened and filtered and thereafter either stored in an underground

storage tank to be utilized for irrigation purposes in the Green belt areas,

or discharged for the purpose of ground water recharge. An amount of

Rs. 1000 lakh is being earmarked for providing drainage network in the

resettlement sites, which will include costs towards excavation, brick

work, cementing, RCC cover, labor, etc.

Sanitation Network within the Resettlement site

Sanitation network is proposed to be laid within each resettlement site.

The main purpose of this network will be to transport domestic waste

(night soil waste from lavatories). In addition, the sanitation network will

also carry waste from schools, health care facility and other complexes

within the resettlement sites. An amount of Rs. 400 lakh is earmarked to

create a network of sewer pipeline emanating from each source, running

parallel along the internal village road. The cost for establishment of

sewer network, including all expenses [(excavation, length of pipe, man-

holes, labor, cover-up, etc. with specification (Dia. 150 mm, RCC NP2

Pipe, 1.5 m depth)]. It is proposed to treat the sewage through septic

tanks. The treated sewage will be disposed in absorption trenches.

Thus, a total provision of Rs. 300 lakh needs to be earmarked for

creation of sanitation network within the resettlement site.

Safe drinking water

Safe drinking water @ 135 lpcd is proposed to be provided to the PAFs

by constructing an overhead storage tank and distributed through a



network of pipelines. It is suggested to lay underground drinking water

pipeline along the internal village road, on the opposite side of the

corridor for drainage and sanitation network. The network would involve

100 mm dia DI pipeline along the internal village roads at various

resettlement sites. The cost for laying this network including digging,

pipes, jointing, labor, etc is about Rs. 500 lakh.

Further, cost towards extending house connections (15 mm dia GI pipe)

from the above-mentioned network would be about Rs. 10 lakh. Thus,

total cost for laying drinking water network is Rs. 610 lakh. It is

suggested that the Project Developer makes arrangement for making

water potable before it is supplied into the resettlement colonies. In this

regard, cost for construction of Conventional Water Treatment Plant has

been earmarked. A total provision of Rs. 250 lakh may be earmarked for

this purpose. Thus, a total amount of Rs. 760 lakh has been earmarked

for providing water supply in the resettlement sites.

Footpath

It order to ensure safe movement of residents within the resettlement

sites, it is proposed to construct 1 m corridor on either sides of the

internal village road for footpath. A lump-sum amount of about Rs. 50

lakh has been earmarked for laying footpath (including leveling, tiling,

labor, etc.).

Drinking water trough for cattle

For families that wish to rear livestock, it is proposed to construct about 4

drinking water troughs for cattle in various resettlement sites. A lump-

sum amount of Rs. 10 lakh is being earmarked for construction of

drinking water troughs for cattle in various resettlement sites.

Place of Worship

A plot size measuring 0.5 ha is suggested to be earmarked for

construction of place of worship in resettlement site. A lump-sum amount

of Rs. 50 lakh has been earmarked for providing place of worship.

Cremation grounds

It is proposed to earmark an area of 1.0 ha of land plot for establishment

of Cremation ground and/or burial ground. A total lump-sum amount of

Rs. 50 lakh may be earmarked for construction of cremation ground in

various resettlement sites.



Fair Price shops and other shops

It is suggested to provide a constructed space for 1 Fair Price shop and

4 other shops in each of the Resettlement colonies. An area of 0.005 ha

[(4m x 2.5m) x 5 shops] may be earmarked in each resettlement site. A

lump-sum amount of Rs. 50 lakh may be earmarked for providing fair

price shop in various resettlement colonies.

Post Office

A plot size measuring 10 m long x 5 m wide is suggested to be

earmarked for the construction of post office, in various resettlement

sites. It is suggested to provide one drinking water post and one WC in a

building. A lump-sum amount of Rs. 25 lakh has been earmarked for

providing post office in various resettlement colonies.

Panchayat Ghar

A plot size measuring 0.25 ha is suggested to be earmarked for the

construction of panchayat ghar. It is suggested to construct the building

over an area of 20m x 15m with one drinking water post and one WC

facility. A lump-sum amount of Rs. 50 lakh may be earmarked for

providing Panchayat ghar in various resettlement colonies.

Community Hall


construction of community hall in various resettlement sites. Further, it is

suggested to construct a two storey building over an area of 20m x 15m.

It is also suggested to provide a drinking water post and two WC on the

ground floor. A lump-sum amount of Rs. 120 lakh may be earmarked for

providing community hall in various resettlement colonies.

Health Care Facility

It is suggested to construct 1 PHCs in the resettlement site to be shared

by all the PAFs and other residents in the vicinity. It is suggested to have

2 ambulances that will be well equipped with medical aid and

paramedical staff.


construction of a Primary Health Center (PHC) in the resettlement site.

In these plots, it is suggested to construct building with covered area of

1250sqm (50m x 25m). Further, it is also suggested to provide a drinking

water post and two WC within the PHC. A lump-sum amount of Rs. 50

lakh may be earmarked for providing the PHC building and Rs. 400 lakh

earmarked for purchase of various furniture and equipment including



well equipped ambulances. Thus, a total amount of Rs. 450 lakh is being

earmarked for creation of PHC in the resettlement site.

It is suggested to engage man-power, as depicted in Table-7.4, to

operate the PHC. Deputing the required man-power and payment of

salaries of staff, purchase of medicines and other recurring expenses

are to be undertaken by the State Government.

Table-7.4: Man-power required in the proposed Primary Health Centre

Staff required Numbers

Medical Officer (1 may be from AYUSH or Lady Medical Officer) 2

Pharmacist 1

Female Health Worker commonly known as Auxiliary Nurse

Midwife (ANM)

2

Male Health Worker commonly known as Multi Purpose Worker

(Male)

1

Health Assistant (Female) commonly known as Lady Health

Visitor (LHV) and

5

Clerks 2

Laboratory Technician 1

Drivers with ambulances 3

Class IV 4

Total 17

Avenue Plantation, Parks and Children's playground

It is proposed to develop Avenue Plantation in the resettlement colony.

An amount of Rs. 30 lakh has been earmarked for this purpose. The

recommended tree species for plantation are given in Table-7.5.

Table-7.5 : Recommended species for Avenue Plantation in Resettlement Colony

Common name Scientific name Characteristics

Michelia Michelia champaca Evergreen tree.

Flowers are yellow/orange in colour, strongly scented.

Southern Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora White/off white scented flower.

Bottle Brush Callestemone lanceolatus

Red color flowers.

Cupressus Golden Cypress sp. Golden in colour.

Rhododendron Rhododendron ponticum

Beautiful and colorful tree.

Available in different colour.

Maidenhair Ginkgo biloba Beautiful tree and is called living fossil and is also known as Maiden Hair Tree.

Hong Kong Orchid Bauhinia blackeana Beautiful flowering trees in



Common name Scientific name Characteristics

Tree purplish red colour.

Deodar Tree Cedrus deodara Tree is known as Himalayan Cedar.

Tall evergreen coniferous tree.

Silver Oak Grevillia robusta Beautiful flowering tree of orange colour flower.

Ritha Sapindus mukorossi Natural remedy for many health problems and natural cleansing properties.

Pomegranate Punica granatun Frequently described as an ingredient in remedies, excellent source of dietary fibre.

Apricot Prunus armeniaca Apricot seeds, apricot oil is used against tumor, swelling, ulcers.

It is proposed to develop parks in resettlement colony. In addition, it is

also suggested that this playground is located in the vicinity of the

school. This would enable school children could also make use of this

playground during recess.

It is suggested to install swings, benches and other items in the garden

and install goal posts and make provision for racing track in the

playground. A lump-sum cost of Rs. 50 lakh is being kept for creation

and beautification of garden and playground.

Two gardeners per resettlement site could be engaged for taking care

and maintenance of these facilities. The recurring expenses towards

salaries, plants & trees, manures, benches, and other equipment is

suggested to be borne by the project developer or by the State

government.

Educational institutions (schools) in resettlement sites

It is suggested to construct a primary school, along-with Anganwadi in

the resettlement site. For this purpose, a plot of about 250 sqm with a

built-up area of 200 sqm could be allocated for the school building in

each site. An amount of Rs. 100 lakh is being earmarked for construction

of primary school along-with anganwadi building in the resettlement site.



Space for weekly market

It is also proposed to allocate 0.15 ha of land in each of the resettlement

colonies for weekly markets. This area will remain un-developed, where

vender could come-in on a weekly basis, set-up their temporary shops to

sell local produce. An amount of Rs. 20 lakh can be earmarked for this

purpose.

An amount of Rs. 3595.0 lakh has been kept for providing civic amenities and

infrastructure facilities in the resettlement sites. The summary of amenities and

facilities to be provided in resettlement sites are summarized in Table-7.6.

Table-7.6: Summary of amenities and facilities to be provided in resettlement

sites

S. No. Amenities & Infrastructure facilities

to be provided in resettlement sites

Cost

(Rs. lakh)

1 Internal village roads 1000.0

2 Drainage network 100.0

3 Sanitation network 700.0

5 Drinking water supply 760.0

6 Footpath 50.0

7 Drinking water trough for cattle 10.0

8 Place of worship 50.0

9 Cremation ground 50.0

10 Fair price shop and other shops 50.0

11 Construction of Post office 25.0

12 Construction of Panchayat Ghar 50.0

13 Construction of Community Hall 120.0

14 Primary Health Centre 450.0

15 Horticulture/Avenue Plantation 30.0

16 Garden and children’s playground 30.0

17 Primary school along-with anganwadi building 100.0

18 Space for weekly market 20.0

Total 3595.0

7.5 MEASURES FOR REHABILITATION

In the proposed project, majority of the population depends on land for their

livelihood. Privately owned land is also expected to be acquired. The

rehabilitation plan would be formulated in line with the norms of “Right to Fair


Resettlement Act, 2013”.



As a part of the study, Land circle rates for project affected villages in each

district was collected. As per the norms of “Right to Fair compensation and

Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013”,

solatium of 100% to be paid. In addition, the land value is also to be multiplied

by a factor of 1.0 and 2.0, based on the distance of project from urban area, as

may be notified by the appropriate government.

As per Government of Uttarakhand Rajaswa Anubhag -3

No.587/XVIII(III)/2016-02(06)/2016 Dated Dehradun, October 10,2016

Notification State Government notify that in rural area, the multiplying factor of

the market value will be two (2.00). Alongwith, according to Section 30(1) of

“The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,

Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,2013”. The collector having determined the

total compensation to be paid shall impose an extra “Solatium” amount

equivalent to one hundred percent of the compensation amount. Thus, land

compensation is taken as 4 times the circle rate finalized by the District

Administration.

The Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,

Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and Uttarakhand Gazette

Notification are enclosed as Annexure-I and Annexure-II respectively

The compensation rate for land acquisition as per the norms of “Right to Fair


Resettlement Act, 2013” for each project affected village is estimated in in

Table-7.7. The budget proposed to be earmarked for Rehabilitation Plan is

estimated as Rs.8239.48 crore. The details are given in Table-7.8.



Table-7.7 Entitlement Matrix for the Private Land Acquisition

S.No District Tehsil Village Name Culturable

Land (ha)

Circle

Rate of

Land (A)

(Rs. lakh)

Compensation

after

considering

factor to be

multiplied in

rural areas

B=(A*2)

Solatium

(C)

(Rs. lakh)

Final

Award

(B+C)

(Rs. lakh)

PANCHESHWAR MPDP

1 Almora Almora Padoli 3.76 37.6 75.2 75.2 150.4

2 Almora Almora Talli Nalli 15.30 153.0 306.0 306.0 612.0

3 Almora Almora M.Nali 23.24 232.4 464.8 464.8 929.7

4 Almora Almora Umer 989.40 9894.0 19788.0 19788.0 39576.0

5 Almora Almora Bamori 12.75 127.5 255.1 255.1 510.2

6 Almora Bhanoli Kunj Kimola Chak 3.93 39.3 78.5 78.5 157.0

7 Almora Bhanoli Birkola 2.29 13.7 27.4 27.4 54.9

8 Almora Bhanoli Deol Sedi 3.14 18.9 37.7 37.7 75.5

9 Almora Bhanoli Dhankana 5.90 35.4 70.8 70.8 141.6

10 Almora Bhanoli Ucha Beda 9.30 55.8 111.6 111.6 223.3

11 Almora Bhanoli Nayal Dhura 13.67 82.0 164.1 164.1 328.1

12 Almora Bhanoli Kuna Pokhari 3.27 19.6 39.2 39.2 78.4

13 Almora Bhanoli Bali Khet 24.14 144.8 289.6 289.6 579.3

14 Almora Bhanoli Dashola Badiyar 25.79 154.8 309.5 309.5 619.0

15 Almora Bhanoli Dhura Lagga Kata 16.26 97.6 195.1 195.1 390.3

16 Almora Bhanoli Kola 10.07 60.4 120.8 120.8 241.6

17 Almora Bhanoi Chamkholi 10.69 64.2 128.3 128.3 256.6

18 Almora Bhanoli Ara Salpar 32.32 193.9 387.8 387.8 775.6




Land (ha)

Circle

Rate of

Land (A)

(Rs. lakh)

Compensation

after

considering

factor to be

multiplied in

rural areas

B=(A*2)

Solatium

(C)

(Rs. lakh)

Final

Award

(B+C)

(Rs. lakh)

19 Almora Bhanoli Mayoli 1.40 8.4 16.8 16.8 33.7

20 Almora Almora Melta 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

21 Almora Almora Jingal 7.54 75.4 150.8 150.8 301.6

Subtotal (A) 230.5 11508.7 23017.4 23017.4 46034.8

22 Champawat Lohagaht Vivel 51.2 374.0 747.9 747.9 1495.9

23 Champawat Lohagaht Khaykot Talla 10.4 66.5 133.0 133.0 266.1

24 Champawat Lohagaht Khaykot Malla 18.0 80.8 161.6 161.6 323.1

25 Champawat Barakot Botadi 37.5 1659.9 3319.8 3319.8 6639.5

26 Champawat Barakot Singda 0.4 16.3 32.6 32.6 65.2

27 Champawat Barakot Raygaon 1.4 16.7 33.3 33.3 66.6

28 Champawat Barakot Sungarkhal 9.7 116.5 233.1 233.1 466.2

29 Champawat Barakot Choolgaon 13.9 167.0 334.0 334.0 668.0

30 Champawat Barakot Betta 5.2 23.3 46.6 46.6 93.3

31 Champawat Barakot Kothera 13.3 60.0 120.0 120.0 240.0

32 Champawat Barakot Salaan 15.8 71.1 142.1 142.1 284.3

33 Champawat Barakot Netra 13.0 58.6 117.2 117.2 234.5

34 Champawat Barakot Gayakajula 1.2 5.6 11.2 11.2 22.5

35 Champawat Barakot Bruyuri 0.4 2.0 4.0 4.0 8.1

36 Champawat Pati Simalkhet 9.3 211.5 423.1 423.1 846.2

Subtotal (B) 200.7 2929.8 5859.7 5859.7 11719.3




Land (ha)

Circle

Rate of

Land (A)

(Rs. lakh)

Compensation

after

considering

factor to be

multiplied in

rural areas

B=(A*2)

Solatium

(C)

(Rs. lakh)

Final

Award

(B+C)

(Rs. lakh)

37 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Garali 0.7 7.3 14.6 14.6 29.2

38 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Dhyan 0.7 53.6 107.3 107.3 214.5

39 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Sakun 16.4 1356.3 2712.6 2712.6 5425.2

40 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Gaurihat 4.3 355.6 711.2 711.2 1422.3

41 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Rajyoura 6.5 539.6 1079.1 1079.1 2158.2

42 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Majirkanda 1279.2 105534.8 211069.7 211069.7 422139.3

43 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Bhateri 0.0 2.5 5.0 5.0 9.9

44 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Geti gadha 24.2 1997.3 3994.7 3994.7 7989.3

45 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Gogana 11.7 965.3 1930.5 1930.5 3861.0

46 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Jamradi 11.2 927.3 1854.6 1854.6 3709.2

47 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Radikhuti 29.1 2400.8 4801.5 4801.5 9603.0

48 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Khadku Bhulya 26.6 2190.4 4380.8 4380.8 8761.5

49 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Upartola 21.5 1773.8 3547.5 3547.5 7095.0

50 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Khatigaon 2.6 212.5 425.0 425.0 850.1

51 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Toli 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

52 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Salla 17.9 1480.1 2960.1 2960.1 5920.2

53 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Kanari 3.9 38.6 77.2 77.2 154.4

54 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Baunkota 4.8 48.4 96.8 96.8 193.6

55 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Tadigaon 24.0 240.0 480.0 480.0 960.0

56 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Gayal Pipali 4.3 43.2 86.4 86.4 172.8




Land (ha)

Circle

Rate of

Land (A)

(Rs. lakh)

Compensation

after

considering

factor to be

multiplied in

rural areas

B=(A*2)

Solatium

(C)

(Rs. lakh)

Final

Award

(B+C)

(Rs. lakh)

57 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Basaur Manain 8.5 84.5 169.0 169.0 338.0

58 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Kutheri 7.5 75.2 150.4 150.4 300.8

59 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Haldu 41.9 419.0 838.0 838.0 1676.0

60 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Kwerali 1.6 16.1 32.2 32.2 64.4

61 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Baltadi 43.5 435.1 870.2 870.2 1740.4

62 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Nisni 2.7 27.1 54.2 54.2 108.4

63 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Matiyal 14.6 145.9 291.8 291.8 583.6

64 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Bhalya 19.3 192.8 385.6 385.6 771.2

65 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Tallisar 9.4 94.3 188.6 188.6 377.2

66 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Sail 11.7 116.6 233.2 233.2 466.4

67 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Tedemiya 49.8 498.0 996.0 996.0 1992.0

68 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh Pati Palchaura 3.7 36.8 73.6 73.6 147.2

69 Pithoragarh Dharchula Dutibagar 13.0 2138.4 4276.8 4276.8 8553.6

70 Pithoragarh Dharchula Kimkhola 23.4 3856.1 7712.1 7712.1 15424.2

71 Pithoragarh Dharchula Dungatoli 7.1 1176.5 2352.9 2352.9 4705.8

72 Pithoragarh Dharchula Tham 0.7 6.9 13.8 13.8 27.6

73 Pithoragarh Didihat Jogyoura 23.4 3092.8 6185.5 6185.5 12371.0

74 Pithoragarh Didihat Jamtari 2.4 24.0 48.0 48.0 96.0

75 Pithoragarh Didihat Garjiya 18.8 188.2 376.4 376.4 752.8

76 Pithoragarh Didihat Bagdihat 25.8 3406.1 6812.3 6812.3 13624.5




Land (ha)

Circle

Rate of

Land (A)

(Rs. lakh)

Compensation

after

considering

factor to be

multiplied in

rural areas

B=(A*2)

Solatium

(C)

(Rs. lakh)

Final

Award

(B+C)

(Rs. lakh)

77 Pithoragarh Didihat Bheliya 1.0 128.0 256.1 256.1 512.2

78 Pithoragarh Didihat Titri 53.8 1774.7 3549.5 3549.5 7099.0

79 Pithoragarh Didihat Chamtoli 26.4 871.2 1742.4 1742.4 3484.8

80 Pithoragarh Didihat Sailoni 23.1 761.3 1522.6 1522.6 3045.2

81 Pithoragarh Didihat Oltari 9.7 96.7 193.4 193.4 386.8

82 Pithoragarh Didihat Ghingrani 26.3 866.3 1732.5 1732.5 3465.0

83 Pithoragarh Kanalichina Syuwan 1.9 61.4 122.8 122.8 245.5

84 Pithoragarh Kanalichina Dwalisera 35.4 1168.2 2336.4 2336.4 4672.8

85 Pithoragarh Kanalichina Daulani 2.3 74.9 149.8 149.8 299.6

86 Pithoragarh Kanalichina Pantsera 30.2 996.3 1992.5 1992.5 3985.1

87 Pithoragarh Kanalichina Bathauli 6.9 68.7 137.4 137.4 274.8

88 Pithoragarh Kanalichina Dyora 40.1 397.2 794.4 794.4 1588.8

89 Pithoragarh Kanalichina Ranwa 23.0 227.4 454.8 454.8 909.6

90 Pithoragarh Kanalichina Sunkholi 12.2 120.5 241.0 241.0 481.9

91 Pithoragarh Kanalichina Amtari 24.0 237.6 475.2 475.2 950.4

92 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Diyuri 1.3 13.1 26.2 26.2 52.4

93 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Bokata 7.8 686.4 1372.8 1372.8 2745.6

94 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Duni 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

95 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Dubola Birtola 17.7 1556.7 3113.4 3113.4 6226.9

96 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Timtachamdugra 0.9 81.5 163.0 163.0 326.0




Land (ha)

Circle

Rate of

Land (A)

(Rs. lakh)

Compensation

after

considering

factor to be

multiplied in

rural areas

B=(A*2)

Solatium

(C)

(Rs. lakh)

Final

Award

(B+C)

(Rs. lakh)

97 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Nali 4.6 406.6 813.1 813.1 1626.2

98 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Palli 1.7 57.1 114.2 114.2 228.4

99 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Sibana 3.0 99.3 198.7 198.7 397.3

100 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Sugadi 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

101 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Damde 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

102 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Bursumbari 3.5 114.5 229.0 229.0 458.0

103 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Chaurghurauli 2.2 73.3 146.5 146.5 293.0

104 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Kharkoli 7.7 254.8 509.5 509.5 1019.0

105 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Askoda 1.6 54.1 108.2 108.2 216.5

106 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Tulkhand 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

107 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Rautora 1.8 59.4 118.8 118.8 237.6

108 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Bungali 5.0 164.0 328.0 328.0 656.0

109 Pithoragarh Gangolihat

Amla Talla Malla

Sugarmavla 0.6 6.1 12.2 12.2 24.4

110 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Suwal 6.2 61.8 123.6 123.6 247.2

111 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Sauli 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

112 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Dhajari 0.6 5.7 11.4 11.4 22.8

113 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Garali 3.1 31.0 62.0 62.0 124.0

114 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Seragada 9.1 91.3 182.6 182.6 365.2

115 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Kuntola 9.8 98.2 196.4 196.4 392.8




Land (ha)

Circle

Rate of

Land (A)

(Rs. lakh)

Compensation

after

considering

factor to be

multiplied in

rural areas

B=(A*2)

Solatium

(C)

(Rs. lakh)

Final

Award

(B+C)

(Rs. lakh)

116 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Raitoli 6.7 67.0 134.0 134.0 268.0

117 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Tudil 2.8 27.8 55.6 55.6 111.2

118 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Dandadhar 9.1 91.4 182.8 182.8 365.6

119 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Jartola 25.0 249.5 499.0 499.0 998.0

120 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Rasyun 8.1 80.7 161.4 161.4 322.8

121 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Sinolibhmalta 2.2 22.1 44.3 44.3 88.6

122 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Busail 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

123 Pithoragarh Gangolihat Kuinar 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Subtotal (C ) 2276.7 148501.2 297002.5 297002.5 594004.9

RUPALIGAD RDP

124 Champawat Lohagaht Bagauti 1.47 10.7 21.4 21.4 42.9

125 Champawat Lohagaht Jindi suradi 6.67 48.7 97.3 97.3 194.7

126 Champawat Lohagaht Matiyani 3.20 23.4 46.7 46.7 93.4

127 Champawat Lohagaht Dungraleti 4.86 35.4 70.9 70.9 141.8

128 Champawat Lohagaht Jamrosa 1.93 12.3 24.6 24.6 49.3

129 Champawat Lohagaht Nidil 17.27 110.5 221.1 221.1 442.2

130 Champawat Lohagaht Pasam 6.65 42.6 85.2 85.2 170.3

131 Champawat Lohagaht Aslad 0.99 6.3 12.7 12.7 25.4

132 Champawat Champawat Bachkot 0.09 3.3 6.6 6.6 13.2

133 Champawat Champawat Polap 0.01 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.9




Land (ha)

Circle

Rate of

Land (A)

(Rs. lakh)

Compensation

after

considering

factor to be

multiplied in

rural areas

B=(A*2)

Solatium

(C)

(Rs. lakh)

Final

Award

(B+C)

(Rs. lakh)

134 Champawat Pati Chilniya 1.03 19.6 39.3 39.3 78.6

Subtotal (D ) 44.16 313.14 626.28 626.28 1252.55

Total(A+B+C+D) 2752.1 163252.9 326505.8 326505.8 653011.6

Source : Land Circle Rates, District Administration



Table-7.8: Provisions for Rehabilitation Plan for families losing land

S. No

Description Unit Assumed Provision#

Cost (Rs. lakh)

1. Land compensation ha Refer Table-7.6 653011.6

2. Rural artisans / Self-employed

One-time financial assistance of a minimum of Rs. 25,000/- to each affected family of an artisan, small trader or self-employed person or an affected family which owned non-agricultural land or commercial, industrial or institutional structure in the affected area, and which has been involuntarily displaced from the affected area due to land acquisition

31023

31023PAFs x Rs.25000/PAF

7755.75

3. Choice of Annuity or Employment

a) At least one member per affected family will be provided job (either in the project or arrange for a job in such other project), after providing suitable training and skill development in the required field Or

b) Onetime payment of Rs. 500,000 per affected family Or

c) Annuity policies that shall pay not less than Rs. 2000 per month per family for 20 years, with appropriate indexation to the Consumer Price Index for Agricultural Labourers

31023

Rs.4.8 lakh/PAF

148910.40

4. Training/Skill Development of the affected persons, so as to enable such persons to take on suitable jobs

31023

31023PAFs x Rs.1000/month x 12 months for each PAF

3722.76

5. Affected persons shall be offered the necessary training facilities for development of entrepreneurship, technical and professional skills for self-employment

31023

31023 PAFs x Rs.2000/month x 12 months for each PAF

7445.52

6. Provision of Rs. 10,000 per PAFs as one time financial assistance

31023 Rs. 10,000/PAF 3102.30

Total 823948.3

7.6 COMMUNITY PROPERTIES

During the survey it was observed that some community properties like Shops,

Tanks, Temples, and Schools etc. will be affected due to the project. Details of



the Community properties affected due to the implementation of the project is

elucidated in Table-7.9.

Table-7.9: Community Properties affected due to the project

S.No Community properties

Pithoragarh Almora Champawat Total

1. Shops 43 3 12 58

2. Tank 7 0 0 7

3. Fish pond 23 2 6 31

4. Water mill 1 0 0 1

5. Panchayat buildings 88 22 26 136

6. Temples 511 122 137 770

7. Post office 23 0 3 26

8. PHC 18 1 1 20

9. Primary school 129 23 27 179

10. Secondary school 60 12 22 94

11. Dug well 7 3 1 11

12. Water tank 190 33 49 272

13. Handpump 6 0 4 10

Table-7.10 elucidates the total compensation earmarked for the community

properties affected due to the implementation of the project. The total land cost

of the affected properties is 8202.81 lakhs. Whereas total cost earmarked for

construction of the Community Structures is Rs.26173 lakhs. The total cost

estimated for the Community Properties is 34375.8 lakhs.

Table-7.10: Provision for Community Properties

S.No

Types of Community properties

to be acquired

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

Are

a(m

2)/

Co

mm

un

ity

Pro

pert

y

To

tal A

rea

(m2

)

Lan

d C

ost

(Rs

.La

kh

)(A

)

Co

st

for

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/Co

mm

un

ity

Str

uc

ture

(Rs

.

Lakh

)

Co

st

for

To

tal

co

nstr

uc

tio

n

(la

kh

) (B

)

To

tal

co

st(

lakh

)

1 Shops 58 25 1450 94.54 1 58 152.54

2 Tank 7 20 140 9.128 1 7 16.128

3 Fish pond 31 20 620 40.424 1 31 71.424

4 Water mill 1 0 0 10 10 10

5 Panchayat buildings

136 100 13600 886.72 10 1360 2246.72

6 Temples 770 50 38500 2510.2 10 7700 10210.2

7 Post office 26 30 780 50.856 5 130 180.856

8 PHC 20 200 4000 260.8 50 1000 1260.8

9 Primary school

179 200 35800 2334.16 50 8950 11284.2

10 Secondary 94 300 28200 1838.64 70 6580 8418.64



S.No

Types of Community properties

to be acquired

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

Are

a(m

2)/

Co

mm

un

ity

Pro

pert

y

To

tal A

rea

(m2

)

Lan

d C

ost

(Rs

.La

kh

)(A

)

Co

st

for

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/Co

mm

un

ity

Str

uc

ture

(Rs

.

Lakh

)

Co

st

for

To

tal

co

nstr

uc

tio

n

(la

kh

) (B

)

To

tal

co

st(

lakh

)

school

11 Dug well 11 0 0 5 55 55

12 Water tank 272 10 2720 177.344 1 272 449.344

13 Handpump 10 0 0 2 20 20

Total cost 8202.81 26173 34375.8

7.7 BUDGET

The total budget for implementation of the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Plan

is Rs. 938348.81 lakh. The details are given in Table-7.11.

Table-7.11: Budget for implementation of the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Plan

S. No. Components of R&R Cost (Rs. lakh)

A Resettlement Plan

1. Land required for providing Housing plots @ 250 sqm to 1308 house losers = 110 ha

72300.28

2. House building assistance 2372.06

3. Financial assistance for construction of cattle-shed 395.34

4. Financial assistance for shifting of the family, building materials, belongings and cattle

654.00

5. Subsistence allowance 654.00

6. One time Resettlement allowance 654.00

Sub-Total [A] 77029.68

B Amenities and Infrastructure Facilities in Resettlement Area (Refer Table-7.6)

3595.0

Sub-Total [B] 3595.0

C Rehabilitation Plan

1. Compensation for Land 653011.6

2. Grant to Rural Artisans 7755.75

3. Annuity payment 148910.40

4. Training/Skill Development to take on suitable jobs 3722.76

5. Training facilities for development of entrepreneurship, technical and professional skills for self-employment

7445.52

6. One time Resettlement allowance 3102.30

Sub-Total [C] 823948.33

D. Community Properties(Refer Table-7.10) 34375.8

Subtotal (D ) 34375.8

Total(A+B+C+D) 938948.81 lakhs say 9389.48 crore



An amount of Rs.165550 lakh has already been earmarked in project cost under B-

land cost. The details are given in Table-7.12.

Table-7.12: Budget earmarked in DPR for Private Land Acquisition

S. No.

Description Unit (ha) Rate (Rs./ha)

Cost (Rs.lakh)

1 Cultivable irrigation land 1078 4200000 45280

2 Cultivated unirrigated land 1117 3200000 35740

Subtotal (A) 2195 160000 81020

3 Crop Compensation (B) 3510

4 Solatium charges on account of compulsory acquisition of private land@ 100% cost for A(C )

160240

Total (B+C ) 165550

Thus, an additional of (Rs. 938948.81 - Rs.165550) Rs.773398.81 lakh needs to be

earmarked for implementation of Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan.

CHAPTER-8

LIVELIHOOD PLAN FOR PAFS WHO ARE LIKELY TO LOSE ENTIRE LANDS


Chapter 8: Livelihood Plan Page 1

CHAPTER – 8

LIVELIHOOD PLAN FOR PAFS WHO ARE LIKELY TO LOSE

ENTIRE LANDS

8.1 INTRODUCTION

The livelihood Plan shall be given to those PAFs who are likely to be loose

major proportion of their land holdings. The families loosing land under

reservoir submergence shall be covered under Livelihood Plan. A total of 1308

PAF are likely to lose homestead and 31023 PAFs are likely to lose land under

reservoir submergence. As part of Income generating activities, following

activities are proposed.

Livestock rearing

Horticulture

Bee Keeping

Eco-tourism

Training for skill development

8.2 LIVESTOCK REARING

Livestock requiring is quite common in the project affected families. It is

proposed that for about 1308 PAFs, 4 cows/buffalos shall be given to each

family. Thus, about 1600 cows / buffaloes shall be purchased. The cost of a

cow/buffalo has been taken as Rs.25,000/-. Thus, total amount spent on each

PAFs shall be Rs.1.0 lakh. In addition, an amount of Rs.25,000/- can be given

to each PAFs for construction of cattle shed and initial inputs. It is proposed to

conduct following training programmes:

Fodder Demonstration

Demonstrations of use of mineral mixture in daily diet of milch animals

Artificial Insemination and natural Breeding in Cow and Buffalo

Training and Exposure of PAFs

Technical Training of Veterinarians instrumental in implementation of

various activities.

Fodder plays a vital role in livestock production. The health and productivity is

directly proportional to quality and balance feeding. The main purpose of this

activity is to educate the farmers about the need of feeding green fodder to

cattle. There are two ways of fodder production i.e. overlapping cropping and

Relay cropping. In overlapping cropping a fodder is introduced in the field



before the other crop completes its life-cycle. In relay cropping, the fodder

crops are grown in succession, i.e. one after another, the gap between the two

crops being very small. Both practices can be taken at field level.

The deficit of green fodder and lack of pasture land has great impact on

increase in number of infertility amongst milch animals. Mineral deficient cow

and buffalo not only shows reduction in wet period but also having poor health

and reduced auto immune system to fight with adverse environment condition.

The demonstration of use of mineral mixture has been envisaged to educate

the farmers for adoption and continuity in daily diet of milch animals.

It is proposed to develop a quality breeding service through commissioning of

Artificial Insemination Centres in project area. It is proposed to select and

trainee 200 unemployed educated youth for door to door artificial insemination

and other related activities. Besides this natural breeding center shall also be

established.

To promote better Livestock management practices in the project area, it is

important to provide skill up-gradation training to the PAFs. For imparting

modern techniques of the livestock management, it is necessary to equip the

department staff with such techniques. Thus, it is proposed to further upgrade

the existing skills in the Department of Animal Husbandry through various

trainings on modern livestock management.

An amount of Rs. 1508.0 lakh has been earmarked for livestock development

amongst PAFs. The details are given in Table-8.1.

Table-8.1: Budget earmarked for livestock development amongst PAFs

S.No. Activity No. Unit Cost

(Rs.)

Budget

(Rs. lakh)

1 Purchase of cows / buffaloes 1308 PAFs 100,000/PAF 1308.0

2 Training of youth in artificial

insemination

200PAFs 50,000/PAF 100.0

3 Grant for establishment of

Natural Breeding centre

Lumpsum 50.0

4 Demonstration for use of

fodder, use of mineral mixture

in daily diet of milch animals

100

demonstrations

Rs. 50,000/

demonstration

50.0

Total 1508.0



8.3 HORTICULTURE

It is proposed to develop horticulture in each of household to be resettlement

colony. It is proposed to provide saplings of horticulture trees to each

household as per the details given in Table-8.2.

Table-8.2: Details of horticulture trees and land requirement

S. No.

Plant No. of trees/ household

No. of households

Total number of trees

Plantation distance (m)

Total Area (m2)

Land requirement (m2)

1. Rithe 2 300 600 10 128 38400

2. Pomegranate 16 300 4800 4 256 76800

3. Apricot 16 300 4800 4 256 76800

4. Peach 16 200 3200 4 256 51200

5. Citrus 16 208 3328 4 256 53248

Total 16728 296448 say 30 ha

The plantation cost per tree is given in Table-8.3. The total cost for horticulture

shall be Rs. 197 crore. The details are given in Tables – 8.3 to 8.5. The

revenue generation per tree is given in Table-8.6.

Table-8.3: Cost of Plantation

S. No Name of Fruit Tree Fruiting Time (Year)

Expenditure on plantation (Each Tree)

1 Ritha (Sapindus Mukorossi)

5 I. Digging of holes 1.2 x 1.2 Mtt. = 236.75

II. Providing and planting of trees @ 50.00 III. Fertilizer and Pesticides @ Rs.

100/year for 4 years = 400 Total= 686.75, say Rs. 700/tree

2 Pomegranate (Punica Granatun)


II. Providing and planting of trees @100.00 III. Fertilizer and Pesticides @ Rs.


3

Apricot (Prunus Armeniaca)



100/year for 4 years = 400



S. No Name of Fruit Tree Fruiting Time (Year)

Expenditure on plantation (Each Tree)

Total= 736.75, say Rs. 750/tree

4 Peach (Prunus Persica)



100/year for 4 years = 400 Total= 736.75 say Rs. 750/tree

5 Citrus Varieties 4 I. Digging of holes 1.2 x 1.2 Mtt. = 236.75



Table-8.4: Cost for Horticulture Development

S.No. Tree Cost (Rs./tree) Unit Rate (Rs./tree)

Total cost (Rs. lakh)

1. Ritha 600 700 4.20

2. Pomegranate 4800 750 36.00

3. Apricot 4800 750 36.00

4. Peach 3200 750 24.00

5. Citrus varieties 3328 750 24.96

Total 16,728 125.16

Table-8.5: Summary of costs for horticulture development

S.No. Item Cost (Rs. lakh)

1. Land cost, compensation for 30 ha of land @ Rs. 6.52 crore/year

19560.00

2. Horticulture Development 125.16

Total 19685.16, Say Rs. 197 crore

Table-8.6: Revenue Generation by Fruit Trees

S. No Name of Fruit Tree

Time required for fruiting (In Years)

Fruit Production after plantation (kg/Year)

Sale Rate Rs./kg

Amount (Rs.)

1 Ritha (Sapindus Mukorossi)

5th 6th 7th

80 120 150

80 80 80

6400.00 9600.00 12000.00



S. No Name of Fruit Tree

Time required for fruiting (In Years)

Fruit Production after plantation (kg/Year)

Sale Rate Rs./kg

Amount (Rs.)

8th 200 80 16000.00

2 Pomegranate (Punica Granatun)

5th 6th 7th 8th

25 40 60 80

80 80 80 80

2000.00 3200.00 4800.00 6400.00

3

Apricot (Prunus Armeniaca)

5th 6th 7th 8th

25 40 60 80

30 30 30 30

750.00 1200.00 1800.00 2400.00

4 Peach (Prunus Persica)

5th 6th 7th 8th

25 40 60 80

30 30 30 30

750.00 1200.00 1800.00 2400.00

5 Citrus Varieties 5th 6th 7th 8th

25 40 60 80

30 30 30 30

750.00 1200.00 1800.00 2400.00

8.4 BEE-KEEPING

Bee keeping will be promoted through conducting demonstrations. It is

proposed to mobilize 500 bee keeping groups. Each group will comprise 10

members so a total 5000 units will be established. Selection of villages and

group members will be based on the potential of this enterprise and the interest

of PAFs. Project will provide a box to each individual member of bee keeping

groups and a churning machine to each group of 10 members. All the members

of the group will share the services of churning machine provided by the

project. Bee keeping groups will also be provided appropriate training.

An amount of Rs 15,000/group including infrastructure and training has been

proposed as project support. Thus, a total amount of Rs. 75 lakh has been

earmarked for this purpose.

8.5 TRAINING FOR SKILL DEVELOPMENT

One member of each family shall give training for skill development. This could

be either male or female member of family. This will be in addition to the

income generating activities mentioned in this plan. The budget for the Training

and Skill development has been earmarked as a part of R&R Plan.



8.6 TOURISM DEVELOPMENT

The reservoir will have great tourism potential and it can create many income

generating resources to the local people in many ways viz ; boating, angling

competition, guide, creation of the paying guest houses, travelers’ tour

packages to the nearby sight-seeing places, development of camping sites,

birds watching etc. This must be linked with the ecology environment of the

reservoir. For the development of the tourism, brochures, pamphlets, signage,

models, opening of the tourism information centers, Telescopes, Binoculars,

computerized data, trekking routes and their stay arrangements etc shall be

required.

The following activities are proposed for the development of the eco-tourism

zone:

Create interest for birds by Bird watching.

Develop infrastructure for perform various water sports activities

such as Boating etc.

Infrastructure for stay of tourists

Provision of house boats, paddle boats

Distribution of plants for plantation on community and private

lands.

Distribution of fruit tray for planting on private lands.

Training to locals, viz. Bird Watching, Boating, Catering, Tourist

guides, etc. etc.

The budget required for implementation of Eco-tourism in the area has been

earmarked in the Tourism Development Plan outlined in Volume-III

(Environmental Management Plan) of this Report.

A Committee for implementation of Eco-tourism can be set up by the State

Government of Uttarakhand. The Committee shall have the following members:

Representative of State Tourism Department

Representative of State Irrigation Department

Superintending Engineer of the Project

Representatives of nearby Gram Panchayat

Representatives of women of the nearby villages.

Representatives of Local NGOs

MLA/MP of the Area



The Committee shall review and oversee the conservation work to be undertaken

8.7 WOMEN SELF HELP GROUPS

The livelihood plan will be implemented through Women Self Help Groups. This

will enable PAFs, to form their own SHG, link them to credit access and

sustainable livelihoods opportunities.

The SHGs shall follow the standard SHG parameters of forming around some

social affinity and mutual trust basis; same gender, regular savings, and inter-

loaning. A SHG shall have around 10-15 members. These SHGs will be

provided support for mobilization, nurturing and SHG formation, financial

management, and development of group solidarity and access skills. As the

SHGs attain certain maturity and became capable of handling key management

issues within the SHG, they will be developed to formulate their own livelihood

plan. The SHGs shall initially start off with thrift and credit through rotation of

the SHG members’ fund, promoted to adopt specific livelihood activities in

gradual phase.

The SHG serves the purpose of providing women members’ space for self-

help, mutual cooperation and collective action for social and economic

development. It promotes savings, build own funds and becomes the local

financial institution to provide a range of financial services including providing

credit for debt-swapping and livelihoods.

The key elements of the SHGs strategy are:

Self-determined group membership and group norms;

Homogeneity in group membership;

Group determined savings and inter-loaning norms;

Initial inter-loaning from own savings for easing consumption

Social capital for providing support services;

CCL from banks to augment capital to meet various credit needs of

the members.

Utilization of Livelihood Support Fund (LSF)

The Self Help Groups shall be implemented in a phased manner. The first

phase included formation and capacity building of self-managed primary

institutions known as SHGs. During the second phase, some of these mature

primary level institutions (SHGs) were promoted to adopt livelihood

enhancement and income generation activities in the cluster. For

implementation of livelihoods and income generation activities amongst the



SHG members of project villages, the approach adopted is based on various

development milestones of SHGs, which are as follows:

Pre-formation (2-3 months): Profiling and assessment of the poor women;

initial interactions

Formation (6 months): Organizing and nurturing, developing norms,

Practicing Panchasutra (Regular meetings; Regular savings; Regular inter-

loaning; Timely repayment; and Up-to-date books of accounts), Developing

Micro Credit Plan, Leadership development

Linkages (6-24 months): Capacity Building, Micro Credit Plan, Linkages

with Banks

Beyond (2nd year onwards): Visioning/Plan, Livelihoods, New Products,

Social Capital

After completion of first phase, skill based market-led training will be imparted

to the members of SHG during the second phase based on skill assessment of

members of SHG. For implementation of livelihoods development program

amongst women beneficiaries of project villages, a multi pronged strategy will

be adopted for identification of good training institutes, which are capable to

impart necessary skill based market-led training to the members of SHG at their

own doorstep.

In the second phase, for implementation of livelihoods development program on

large scale amongst the SHGs of the project villages, it has been planned to

provide Livelihood Support Fund (LSF) of Rs.45000/- to the SHGs, which have

qualified the credit rating as per maturity index and prepared their own

livelihoods development plan in two tranches:

LSF- 1:- First tranche of Rs. 15,000/- to be provided to those WSHG, which

have qualified in A or B category in the WSHG assessment and have

developed their Micro Credit Plan.

LSF-2:- Second tranche of Rs. 30,000/- to be provided to those WSHG, which

have utilized LSF-1 grant within 3 months and members have refunded the

same to the WSHG and / or the CCL has been sanctioned by the Bank.

It is proposed to develop 3,000 SHGs. An amount of Rs. 1350 lakh has been

earmarked for this purpose.

The self-help groups will have to exhibit adequate maturity in order to receive

cost support from the project. The maturity status/level will be assessed on the

basis of maturity index/indicators summarized in Table-8.7.



Table-8.7: Maturity Index/Indicators to assess the maturity of Self-Help Groups

S. No.

Indicator Definition and description Maturity level

1. 1 Retention of members

Percentage of members remaining as member

Retention level of at least 90 percent

2. 2 Regular meeting Percentage of scheduled meetings held

Regularity level of at least 80%

3. 3 Regular saving Percentage of members regularly saving

Regularity level of at least 80%

4. 4 Internal loaning and repayment

Percentage of loans timely repaid back

Repayment of at least 90%

5. 5 Turnover of available funds/credit limit

Credit-deposit ratio Minimum ratio of 4:1

6. 6 Identification of Income Generating Activities

Number of activities identified %age of members willing to take up the identified activities

70% of members willing to take up at least 1 activity

8.8 BUDGET FOR LIVELIHOOD PLAN FOR PAFS

An amount of Rs.22618.16 lakh has been earmarked for implementation of

plan for income generating activities, which is in addition to the cost earmarked

for implementation of Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan. The details are

given in Table-8.8.

Table-8.8: Budget earmarked for implementation of plan for income generating

activities

S. No. Activity Budget

(Rs. lakh)

1 Livestock Rearing (Refer Table-8.1) 1508.00

2 Horticulture (Refer Table-8.5) 19685.16

3. Bee Keeping 75.00

4. Self Help Groups 1350.00

Total 22618.16

CHAPTER-9 LOCAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN


Chapter 9: Local Area Development Plan Page 1

CHAPTER–9

LOCAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN

9.1 INTRODUCTION

The present chapter outlines the Local Area Development Plan (LADP) for

Pancheshwar Project. The objective of the plan is to empower the families of

the study area villages. Contrarily, it is the project affected families residing in

affected who are not likely to benefit from the proposed project except for

compensation of their acquired properties, which would be mostly part of their

lands. Thus, LADP is being framed to extend benefits to not only the residents

of the affected villages, but also to residents of the villages adjoining to project

area which are also within the study area villages.

The following aspects have been covered under the Local Area Development

Plan:

Educational Facilities

Health Care and Medical Facilities

Infrastructure Development

Economic Development

Social and Cultural Development

A budget of 0.5% of the project cost has been earmarked for implementation of

Local Area Development Plan (LADP) which is 168 Crore.

9.2 LOCAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN

9.2.1 Up gradation of Educational Facilities

It is proposed to upgrade the primary schools in 25 villages in the periphery of

the affected villages. The following activities are proposed under LADP

activities:

Up-gradation of school fixtures, equipment

Improvement of drinking water facilities

School bus service

It is suggested to upgrade school fixtures, equipment, etc., and to improve

drinking water facilities in one primary school in 25 study area villages. A lump-

sum amount of Rs. 15.0 lakh per primary school is being made for this purpose.



Since 25 primary schools are to be upgraded, an amount of Rs.362.5 lakh

needs to be earmarked for this purpose. In addition, an amount of Rs.200 lakh

has been earmarked for purchase of 10 school vans/mini-buses. Thus, total

lump-sum amount of Rs.562.5 lakh needs to be earmarked for this purpose.

The breakup of cost required for up-gradation of existing primary schools is

given in Table–9.1. The list of villages in which existing primary schools are to

be upgraded is enclosed as Table-9.2.

Table 9.1: Break up of cost required for up-gradation of existing primary schools

S. No. Particular Amount

(Rs. lakh)

/school

Amount

(Rs. lakh) for

25 schools

1 Furniture & fixtures and equipment 5.0 125.0

2 Improvement of drinking water facilities 5.0 125.0

3 Toilets with biodigested to be

constructed in each school

4.5 112.5

Sub-Total (A) 15.0 362.5

3 Purchase of school vans/mini-buses x

10 Nos.

20.0 200.0

Sub-Total (B) 200.0

Total (A + B) 562.5

Table-9.2: List of Villages for Up-gradation of Primary Schools

S. No. Village Name Primary School

District Pithoragarh

1 Kimkhola 1

2 Tham 1

3 Duti Bagad 1

4 Raitoli 1

5 Kunlta 1

6 Busail 1

7 Pant Sera 1

8 Sunkholi 1

9 Dyora 1

10 Bathauli 1

11 Ranuwa 1

12 Oltari 1

13 Bheliya 1

14 Garali 1

15 Jamtari 1

District Almora

1 Kola 1



S. No. Village Name Primary School

2 Chimkholi 1

3 Mayoli 1

4 Birkola 1

5 Jingal 1

District Champawat

1 Bachkot 1

2 Polap 1

3 Simalkhet 1

4 Nidil 1

5 Aslad 1

It is further suggested to construct 22 new schools in partially affected as well

as in nearby periphery villages. It is to be noted that the cost of land required

for the construction of the new Primary Schools is not included in the assumed

provision earmarked. The land and the village has to be decided by the District

Administration for construction of the new Primary School. The breakup of cost

required for construction of new primary schools is given in Table–9.3.

Table 9.3: Break up of cost required for construction of new primary schools

S. No. Particular Amount

(Rs. lakh)

/school

Amount

(Rs. lakh) for

20 schools

1 Construction of new schools 30.0 600.0

2 Furniture & fixtures and equipment 15.0 300.0

3 Drinking Water Facilities 10.0 200.0

4 Toilets with biodigested to be

constructed in each school

4.5 90.0

5 Purchase of school vans/mini-

buses x 22 Nos.

20.0 400.0

Total 79.5 1590.0

9.2.2 Scholarships for Students

It is suggested to provide scholarships for local students. For all those students

who are presently studying between Class–I to college, about 100 scholarships

are suggested for them. It is proposed that an amount of Rs. 1000 per month

for a period of 12 years may be extended as scholarship to about 10 students

in each of the 50 Study Area Villages. Thus, a total of 500 students will be

covered under this scheme. These students will then be supported in their

college education as well. Each student will get Rs. 20,000 for meeting their fee

and study material requirement. In addition, they will get Rs. 3000 per month for



meeting their hostel requirements, as they will have to move out of their areas

for higher studies.

In addition, there are youths who have completed school level at present as

well. It is suggested to give an impetus to such youths who wish to pursue

college or higher education. These students will also be supported for college

education. About 500 such students (10 students in each of the 50 Study Area

villages) will be supported by the project. Thus, a total of 1000 students will be

supported for college education.

A total amount of Rs. 2576.0 lakh say Rs. 25.76 Crore may be earmarked for

providing scholarships, as part of local area development plan. The details are

given in Table–9.4.

Table – 9.4: Details of scholarships

S. No. Activities Amount

(Rs. lakh)

1 School education (Rs. 1500/month for 144 months

for 600 students)

1296.0

2 College education

a) Fees/course material (@ Rs. 20000/ student

for 1000 students)

b) Hostel expenses (@ Rs. 3000/month for 36

months for 1000 students)

200.0

1080.0

Total 2576.0

9.2.3 Improvement of Public Health Facilities

It is proposed up-grade existing Primary Health Sub-Centers as part of the

LADP of the area. Up-gradation of this health care facility would involve

renovation of existing structure/ construction of new wing, if required. Provision

of new and/or latest gadgets and instruments, such as furniture, beds,

laboratory equipment/instruments, computers wherever possible, installation of

new floorings and ceilings, up-gradation/ construction of new of lavatories,

electrification and adequate and proper lighting in rooms, facilities for cold

storage of essential medicines, provision of drinking water facilities, etc. An

amount of Rs. 150 lakh is being made for up-gradation of the existing PHSCs at

villages Askora (tehsil Gangolihat) and Majirkanda (tehsil Pithoragargh) in

district Pithoragarh. The details are given in Table-9.5.

In addition, it is suggested to purchase 4 vans fitted with life saving equipment

and stocked with medicines, which will function as a mobile clinics. It is further



suggested to attach these mobile clinics to any of the above mentioned PHSCs

from where these mobile units will operate. A lump-sum amount of Rs. 160 lakh

is being earmarked for this purpose.

A total amount of Rs. 310.0 lakh is being earmarked for extending health

facilities under LADP. The details are given in Table 8.4. Whereas Table-8.5

elucidates the proposed new Primary Health Centre in the partially affected

villages as well as nearby periphery villages. It is seen that the assumed cost

for construction of one PHC is 140.0 lakhs. Hence it is proposed to construct 22

new PHC in the area and assumed assumption for the same is 3080.00 lakhs.

It is to be noted that the land and the villages where these new proposed PHCs

shall be constructed will be decided by the District Administration.

Table-9.5: Budget for up-gradation of PHSCs

S. No. Item Cost

(Rs. lakh)

Cost for 2

PHSCs

(Rs. lakh)

1 Furniture, Beds and other items 15.0 30.0

2 Up-gradation of Pathological laboratory 30.0 60.0

3 Up-gradation of operation theater (labor

room)

30.0 60.0

Sub-Total (A) 50.0 150.0

4 Purchase of 4 mobile clinic vans 40.0 160.0

Sub-Total (B) 160.0

Total (A+B) 310.0

Table-9.6: Budget for construction of new PHSCs

S. No. Item Cost

(Rs. lakh)

Cost of 22

new PHC

(in lakhs)

1 Construction of new Primary

Health Centre

50.0 1100.00

2 Furniture, Beds and other items 15.0 330.0

3 Up-gradation of Pathological

laboratory

25.0 550.0

4 Up-gradation of operation theater

(labor room)

25.0 550.0

5 Purchase of mobile clinic vans 25.0 550.0

Total 140 3080

Land Cost for the Construction of the proposed new PHC is not included



9.2.4 Construction of Community Toilets

It is proposed to construct community toilets with bio-digestors along with Reed

Bed in various study area villages. It is proposed to construct 8 seater

community toilets with bio-digestors along with Reed Bed in 112 Villages which

are partially affected by the project. The cost of 8 seaters community toilet with

bio-digester alongwith Reed Bed in each village will be Rs. 18.0 lakh. The cost

of community toilet 8 seater is given in Table-9.7. The cost includes provision

for development of water supply facilities for toilets. Thus, total costs earmarked

for community toilets shall be Rs. 2016 lakh say Rs.20.16 Crore.

Table-9.7: Budget for construction of community toilets in study area villages

S. No. Item Cost

(Rs. lakh)

Cost of 112 new

community toilets

(Rs. lakh)

1 Civil works 11.70 1310.4

2 Electric works 1.10 123.2

3 Plumbing Works 1.0 112.0

4 Bio-digestor of capacity 5000 litres

alongwith Reed Bed for all 8 seats

4.20 470.4

Total 18.00 2016

9.2.5 Industrial Training Institute (ITI)

It is proposed to develop Industrial Training Institute (ITI) for imparting technical

skills to local people. The location of ITI will be decided in consultation with

State Government and the land will be provided by District Administration. The

project proponent proposes to contribute an amount of Rs.600.0 lakh.

9.2.6 Upgradation of Existing Hospitals

It is proposed that the government hospital at Champawat, Pithoragarh and

Almora shall be upgraded by the project proponent. It is suggested that the

existing infrastructure facilities could be improved wherever possible or newly

created/ augmented if required.

Up-gradation of health care facility would involve renovation of existing

structure/ construction of new wing, if required. Provision of new and/or latest

gadgets and instruments, such as furniture, beds, laboratory

equipment/instruments, computers wherever possible, etc painting of walls,

installation of new floorings and ceilings, beautification of premises with lawns



and flower-beds, up-gradation/ construction of new of lavatories, electrification

and adequate and proper lighting in room, facilities for cold storage of essential

medicines, provision of drinking water facilities, etc.

An amount of Rs. 5940 lakh say 59.40 Crore is being made for up-gradation of

the existing one each government hospital at Champawat, Pithoragarh and

Almora. The details are given in Table-9.8.

Table-9.8: Cost for up-gradation of Government hospital

S. No. Item Cost

(Rs. Lakh/per

hospital)

Cost of up gradation

of 3 existing

hospitals in project

area districts

(Rs. lakh)

1. Hospital building 20,000 sq.ft.@

Rs. 2000/sq.ft.

400.00 1200.00

2. Land cost 500.00 1500.00

3. Furniture, Beds and other items 100.00 300.00

4. Up gradation of Pathological

laboratory

300.00 900.00

5. X-ray machines 60.00 180.00

6. ECG machines 60.00 180.00

7. Up-gradation of operation

theater

300.00 900.00

8. Ventilator/ Defoliator 200.00 600.00

9 Purchase of one van 30.00 90.00

10. Purchase of two vans with

medical facilities

60.00 180.00

11. Computer, printers, UPS, etc. 20.00 60.00

Total 1980 5940

9.3 BUDGET FOR LADP

An amount of Rs. 16833.5 lakh say Rs. 168.4 Crore is being made for

implementation of the LADP Activities. The details are shown in Table-9.9.

Table-9.9: Budget for implementation of Local Area Development Plan

S. No. Items Budget

(Rs. lakh)

1 Upgradation of Educational Facility 562.5

2 Construction of new Primary School 1749.0

3 Scholarships for Students 2576.00



S. No. Items Budget

(Rs. lakh)

4 Upgradation of existing PHCs 310.0

5 Construction of new Primary School 3080.00

6 Construction of new Community Toilets 2016.00

7 Industrial Training Institute 600.00

8 Upgardation of Existing Hospitals 5940.00

Total 16833.5

Say Rs. 168.4 Crore

CHAPTER-10

MONITORING AND EVALUATION


Chapter 10: Monitoring & Evaluation Page 1

CHAPTER-10

MONITORING AND EVALUATION

10.1 INTRODUCTION

Monitoring is an essential component for sustainability of any water resources

project. It is an integral part of any environmental assessment process. Any

water resources development project introduces complex inter-relationships in

the project area between people, various natural resources, biota and the

developing forces. Thus, a new environment is created. It is very difficult to

predict with complete certainty the exact post-project environmental scenario.

Hence, monitoring of critical parameters is essential in the project operation

phase.

Monitoring of social indicators signal potential problems and facilitate timely

prompt implementation of effective remedial measures. The data so generated

can serve as a data bank for prediction of post-project scenarios in similar

projects.

10.2 INSTITUTIONAL/ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENT FOR

IMPLEMENTATION OF R&R MEASURES

Appointment of Administrator at State Level

State Government of Uttarakhand shall appoint an officer not below the

rank of Joint Collector or Additional Collector or Deputy Collector or

equivalent official of Revenue Department, who will be responsible for

R&R Plan at the State Level.

Administrator shall, with a view to enable him to function efficiently and

to meet the special time-frame, be provided with such powers, duties

and responsibilities as may be prescribed by the appropriate

Government and provided with office infrastructure and be assisted by

such officers and employees who shall be subordinate to him as the

appropriate Government may decide.

Subject to the superintendence, directions and control of the appropriate

Government and the Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement,

the formulation, execution and monitoring of the Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Scheme shall vest in the Administrator.



Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement

The State Government of Uttarakhand shall appoint an officer of the rank

of Commissioner or Secretary of that Government for rehabilitation and

resettlement of affected families under this Act, to be called the

Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement.

The Commissioner shall be responsible for supervising the formulation

of rehabilitation and resettlement schemes or plans and proper

implementation of each schemes or plans.

The Commissioner shall be responsible for the post implementation

social audit in consultation with the Gram Sabha in rural areas and

municipality in the urban areas.

Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee at Project Level

Where land proposed to be acquired is equal to or more than one

hundred acres, the appropriate Government shall constitute a

Committee under the chairmanship of the Collector to be called the

Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee, to monitor and review the

progress of implementation of the Rehabilitation and Resettlement

scheme and to carry out post-implementation social audits in

consultation with the Gram Sabha in rural areas and municipality in

urban areas.

The Rehabilitation and resettlement Committee shall include ,apart from

officers of the appropriate Government, the following members, namely:-

- representative of women residing in the affected area;

- a representative of each schedule caste and schedule tribe residing

in the affected area

- a representative of a voluntary organization working in the area

- a representative of a nationalized bank the land acquisition officer of

the project

- the chairperson of the panchayats or municipalities located in the

affected area or their nominees

- the chairperson of the district planning committee or his nominee

- the Member of Parliament and Member of Legislative assembly of the

concerned area or nominees

- a representative of the requiring body

- Administrator for Rehabilitation and Resettlement as the member

Convener.

The procedure regulating the discharge of the process given in this

section and other matters connected thereto of the Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Committee shall be such as may be prescribed by the



appropriate Government.

10.3 MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) must be simultaneous with the

implementation of Rehabilitation Plan. It requires specialized skill for application

of general project monitoring procedures to the process of land acquisition and

rehabilitation. Conventional monitoring, normally carried out by the Government

machinery, often misses focus on certain vital aspects and does not identify

certain shortcomings, which may otherwise prove very important. While the

conventional government monitoring will continue, an external M&E agency will

also be engaged to help in proper monitoring of land acquisition and

rehabilitation programs. The main purpose of involving such an agency is to

bring the problems and difficulties faced by the PAFs to the notice of

Administrator R&R on a regular basis for their redressal as well as to help in

formulating and undertaking corrective measures. The external Monitoring and

Evaluation (M&E) agency can submit half yearly reports on the progress of

implementing Rehabilitation Master Plan (RMP) along with suggestions and

corrective measures required for improvement in the implementation of

Rehabilitation Plan.

For Land Acquisition and rehabilitation program, M&E system will consist of:

i) Administrative monitoring;

ii) Socio-economic performance, and

iii) Impact evaluation.

Administrative monitoring will be conventionally carried out by SLAO, project

authorities, Resettlement Commissioner and other concerned government

agencies/departments. The focus will be on physical (like number of land

holders affected and land based resettlement, area identified for allotment to

Village Level Committee, etc.) and financial (like compensation paid, payment

to M&E agency, office establishment cost, etc.) parameters.

The socio-economic monitoring which will be carried out concurrently is the

crux of M&E exercise to provide interim measures based on the field level

situations. This along-with impact evaluation at the end of plan period will be

carried out by the M&E agency. While covering the affected community,

monitoring will focus on the vulnerable groups like women, physically

handicapped, etc. The household information collected through the socio-

economic survey will form the benchmarks for comparison. However, these

benchmarks will be supplemented in order to create new reference points

against performance, effects and objectives.



10.3.1 Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines

Monitoring of the progress of R&R is important because of the sensitivity of

these issues. The objective of monitoring is to assess the progress of

resettlement activity, to identify difficulties, ascertain problem areas, and

provide indication for the need of calling attention to some specific issues at an

early stage. Following tasks have to be performed by the group at different

stages of the project:

Establish baseline information on individual PAFs and their pre-

project standards of living, health conditions, nutritional patterns, etc.

This should precede resettlement in general by a year.

The planning of the resettlement monitoring studies could cover

disbursement of compensation and grants.

Monitoring of resettlement sites regarding, preparation of land,

construction activities, water and other facilities required before the

actual resettling of PAFs.

The resettlement monitoring system could cover transport of people,

belongings and allocation of replacement assets. Their report should

also include information on performance of field staff and concerned

official’s participation of the PAFs and host community reactions.

After resettlement, a few sensitive indicators using sample survey

techniques should be measured, mainly to understand how effective

the R&R plan has been in reality.

The monitoring and evaluation can continue for several years after

actual relocation. The frequency of monitoring can be reduced after

the completion of R&R work. The monitoring reports need to be

submitted periodically to assess progress of resettlement and its

effects compared with established policy and specific timetables and

benchmarks at each phase.

10.3.2 Post-Project Monitoring

Status of availability of alternative homestead for project affected persons,

development of infrastructural facilities such as schools, sewer networks, roads,

etc. are some of the aspects which could be considered for monitoring and

modifications may be suggested if required. It needs to be appreciated that

R&R issues are politically and socially sensitive issues and need timely

attention. For such reasons, it is suggested that the monitoring be conducted by

an independent agency not connected with the project. Therefore, an

independent Consultant having experience in monitoring & evaluation of

implementation of Resettlement & Rehabilitation Plans in similar areas and not



connected with the project can be appointed for monitoring the project. The

Consultant will review the rehabilitation and resettlement programme after 2nd,

4th and 6th year from the completion of the R&R activity.

10.3.3 Participation of PAFs

Involvement of affected communities in planning and implementation of

rehabilitation programs according to their felt needs and socio-economic

conditions are of vital importance. To obtain co-operation, participation and

feedback, PAFs need to be systematically informed and consulted during

preparation and implementation of resettlement plan about their options and

rights. In the proposed project, co-operation and participation of PAFs in the

resettlement process could be ensured through their involvement in each of the

following stages.

Involvement in preparation of Rehabilitation Master Plan

As a part of participatory planning, community meetings should be held on a

routine basis to explain about the project and the R&R policy of the project.

Direct communication with the PAFs will negate the politicization of the R&R

Process. The communication with the PAFs can be through the Village Level

Committee.

Involvement of PAFs in implementation process

The Village Level Committee can be involved in the implementation of

Rehabilitation Plan particularly during the identification of forest land to be

allotted to Village Level Committee. They shall also be consulted in finding out

alternative economic opportunities to supplement their household income.

However, some NGO groups can also be associated which can interact directly

with the project authorities and the affected population.

10.3.4 Parameters for Monitoring and Evaluation of R&R Plan

Once the R&R Plan is implemented, affected families should not be forgotten.

Their progress should be monitored, evaluated and recorded. This would

greatly help the government or other organizations for further improving the

Rehabilitation and Resettlement guidelines. It would form a basis of evaluating

whether the resettlement has been a success or not. If the resettlement has not

been successful, the answers would come out at this stage and the same

mistakes can be avoided for other resettlement schemes.

Priorities that would have to be monitored and evaluated are; is the family's



income more or less in their new location? Do they inter-mingle with the host

population? If not, why? Has their standard of living increased or decreased?

Are health and education facilities more accessible to them? Have new

opportunities come their way or have they stagnated? etc. Such questions

would prove invaluable in assessing the success of the resettlement scheme.

Progress report of their resettlers should be maintained. The progress report

format should include among others the following:

Total household covered under the R&R plan:

(1) No of families

(2) Population

Birth and Death information:

(1) No. of children born

(2) No. of deaths

Income and expenditure (monthly) pattern of the resettlers

(1) Average monthly income (with its break up)

(2) Average monthly expenditure (with its break-up)

House constructions:

(1) No. of constructions under progress

(2) Constructions completed

(3) Materials used

(4) Size of construction

Credit facilities availed:

(1) No. of resettled families that have availed of credit

(2) Purpose for credit availed

(3) Sizes of credit availed

Loan Recovery:

(1) Excellent (100%)

(2) Good (over 50%)

(3) Bad (below 20%)

Agricultural inputs;

(1) Seeds (kg)

(2) Fertilizers (kg)

(3) Pesticides (kg)



Agricultural Production:

(1) Annual cereal productions (kg)

(2) Cash crop productions (kg)

(3) Other farm produces (kg)

Education facilities:

(1) Primary School

(2) Community School

(3) Junior High School

(4) Others

(5) No. of students enrolled

Medical facilities:

(1) BHU (Basic Health Unit)

(2) Dispensaries

(3) Others

Communication:

(1) Distance from motorable road

(2) Distance from telephone

(3) Distance from Post office

(4) Distance from Bus stop

Drinking water:

(1) Piped water

(2) Natural stream water

(3) Other sources of water

Rural electrification:

(1) No. of houses covered

If such a format was included the progress of the resettled families can be

easily monitored and evaluated. However, such a formatted progress report

would have to be up dated annually for a minimum of five years in order to get

an accurate picture.

10.4 BUDGET

An amount of Rs.250 lakh has been earmarked for conducting Monitoring &

Evaluation Studies for implementation of Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan.

CHAPTER-11

COST ESTIMATES


Chapter 11: Cost Estimates Page 1

CHAPTER-11

COST ESTIMATES

11.1 COST FOR IMPLEMENTING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL

ASPECTS

The total amount to be spent for implementation of Management Plan for Social

Aspects is Rs. 813100.47 lakh or Rs.8131.00 crore. The details are given in Table-

11.1.

Table-11.1: Cost for Implementing Social Management Plan

S. No. Item Cost

(Rs. lakh)

1. Rehabilitation & Resettlement Plan 773398.81

2. Livelihood Plan for PAFs (Refer Table-8.8) 22618.16

3. Local Area Development Plan (Refer Table-9.9) 16833.5

4. Monitoring and Evaluation Aspects (Refer Section-9.4) 250.00

Total 813100.47

ANNEXURE

Consultant:

76-C, Institutional Area, Sector – 18, Gurgaon – 122015, Haryana (INDIA)

Telephone: 0124-2342576, Fax: 0124-2349187 [email protected]

Website: http://www.wapcos.co.in JUNE 2017

pancheshwar development authority (pda) · 1.8 project features 10 1.9 outline of the report 11...

Documents