pacific risk exposure databases and models
DESCRIPTION
World Bank: Catastrophe Risk Financing Initiative – Phase II ADB: Regional Partnerships for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Preparedness. Pacific Risk Exposure Databases and Models. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Pacific Risk Exposure Databases and Models
Phil Glassey, Paolo Bazzurro, Michael Bonte-Grapentin, Chris Chiesa, Olivier Mahul, Edy Brotoisworo, Phil Bright, David Heron, Litea Biukoto, Todd Bosse,Steven Clegg, Bishwa Pandey, Joy Papao, Scott Pontifex, Susan Vocea
World Bank: Catastrophe Risk Financing Initiative – Phase IIADB: Regional Partnerships for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Preparedness
Pacific Disaster Risk Assessment
• Regional Disaster Impact Database• National and Regional Risk Exposure Databases• Earthquake and Cyclone Hazard Models • Country-specific Catastrophe Risk Models
Hazard Assets
Exposure
Affected Assets
Loss $$
Pacific Disaster Risk Assessment• Why?
– Data allows risk modelling/profiling• investigate risk financing options (such as Pacific Disaster
Reserve Fund)• Guide investment in DRR and CCA
– Reduce risk by • avoiding hazardous areas - planning• avoiding vulnerable designs – building permitting and monitoring
– Reduce losses by • being prepared• responding quickly and appropriately
• Fifteen countries considered
• Exposure: residential, commercial, industrial, public assets, main infrastructure, major crops, population
• Perils: Earthquakes (shaking + tsunami) and Tropical Cyclones (wind, surge, and rain)
Project Coverage
Cook Islands Fiji Papua New
Guinea (PNG) Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Tuvalu Vanuatu
Niue Nauru Federated
States of Micronesia
Marshall Islands
Palau Kiribati Timor Leste
Historical Earthquakes 1900-2009
Solomon Islands
Vanuatu
Samoa
Timor Leste
Federated States of Micronesia
Republic of Marshall Islands
NauruKiribati
Tuvalu
Niue
TongaCook
Islands
Palau
M8.1 4/1/2007 Solomon Islands
54 fatalities 7,000 homeless $3.0MM in aid
M8.1 9/29/2009 Samoa and Tonga
192 fatalities 3,000 homeless $3.5MM in aid
Historical Tropical Cyclones 1948-2009
Equator
Solomon Islands
Vanuatu
Samoa
Timor Leste
Federated States of Micronesia
Republic of Marshall Islands
NauruKiribati
Tuvalu
Niue
TongaCook
Islands
Palau
Papua New
Guinea
Fiji
Number Of Events
Earthquake Tropical Cyclone Tsunami
Severe Local Storm
Flood Storm Surge Landslide Total
Cook Islands 0 29 2 0 1 0 0 32Federated States of
Micronesia 0 12 0 0 0 0 1 13
Fiji 11 62 1 1 15 0 2 92Kiribati 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Marshall Islands 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5Nauru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Niue 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6Palau 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4
Papua New Guinea 71 5 3 2 28 0 11 120Samoa 7 11 1 2 2 1 0 24
Solomon Islands 22 23 0 0 2 1 1 49Timor Leste 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
Tonga 7 24 0 1 0 0 0 32Tuvalu 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8
Vanuatu 21 35 0 2 1 0 1 60Total 139 224 7 8 51 3 16 448
SourceEvents
Referenced
EM-DAT Catalog 27%
NGDC’s Significant Earthquake Database 18%
Munich Re NatCatSERVICE Database 31%
AusAID Database 21%
Pacific Disaster Net Database 34%
Note: More than 20 sources looked at; some events have data from multiple sources
Major Sources
Reported Data
Building footprint capture
• Building footprints captured from VHR satellite imagery
• Field checked when doing building field surveys
Summary Building Footprints
~ 340,000 buildings
Attributes based on local knowledge
Summary Asset Survey
Largest and most comprehensive dataset for Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change Adaptation ever collected within the Pacific Islands
Country Buildings in survey areas
Features surveyed
% No Buildings Pacific Cities
Cook Islands 8,282 5,886 71
Fiji 56,734 19,533 34 9,181
FSM - Yap 2,244 648 29
Kiribati 9253 999 9
Papua New Guinea 68,642 13,976 20
Palau 5,575 1,315 24
Samoa 19,269 7,197 37 3,897
Solomon Islands 27,119 15,736 58 1,800
Tonga 19,960 10,262 51 2,754
Tuvalu 623 996 160
Vanuatu 23,184 15,675 68 4,803
TOTAL 231,633 92,223 40 22,435
In-country SurveysThe survey involves:• Data preparation and develop mapping projects in advance• Initial consultation with stakeholders• Training of counterpart staff • Field campaigns to collect building and infrastructure data, as
well as field check the digitising of building footprints • Determining other available data, negotiating data access and
obtaining data.• Determining status of existing Mapserver infrastructure and
systems.• A debrief meeting with stakeholders to present the results of
the surveys and discuss data use, maintenance and sharing.
Training and Reference Material
Field Data Collection• Collect new information
• Utilise pre-prepared menus, hand held devices, satellite imagery and other digital maps and local counterparts
Buildings• Location represented as
footprint and point
• Attributes captured to characterize building in terms of use and construction
• Used to estimate “Fragility” of buildings when exposed to
–earthquake shaking–tsunami–cyclonic wind–other hazards
Transportation
• Roads and bridges
• Airports, Wharves
Utilities• Electricity• Water• Communications
Other data• Topography/Bathymetry
• Contours and hydrology• Key for storm surge, tsunami, and
cyclonic winds
• Geology and soils• Key for earthquake shaking
• Census Data• Attributes can be extrapolated using
similar building type collected by field work
• Used to estimate casualties, human displacement etc
Cook Is – GIS Data, Rarotonga
FSM – Yap State
Major changes to building stock due to Typhoon Suudal
Solomon Is. – GIS Data, Honiara
Apia
Vanuatu – GIS Data, Port Vila
Madang
Coastal Hazard Areas
What else can this data be used for?
Damage assessments– Data can be used to assign and calculate damage to
buildings already located and characterised in terms of construction
– Handheld computers with “damage” menu pages can provide quick and consistent damage reports
Map Viewer
QA/QCReport
Tool
Web enabled
Can be used as a building report
Data Collection IssuesData Collection Issues• Natural hazards:
– Cyclone Pat, Aitutaki Cook Islands, – Cyclone Ulia Solomon Islands,– 3 erupting volcanoes in Vanuatu,
• Other hazards– Ill health/disease– Dogs – 5 dog bites in all, 3 in Samoa
• Inconsistent assistance from local counterparts
• Reluctance of Gov’t departments to give access to data
• Poor georeferenced imagery/lack of control points
• Vehicle difficulties – poor roads
• Communication problems
• Suspicious people
Challenges - Sustainability
• Capacity development within countries to sustain and apply products (‘not another data collection exercise’)
• Data sharing amongst agencies• Development of tools and products to meet
country needs • Bridge the gap from Science to Policy –
products need to assist development planners and DRM/CCA policy makers