outsourcing and innovation michael weeks saïd business school university of oxford © 2003, michael...
TRANSCRIPT
Outsourcing and Innovation
Michael Weeks
Saïd Business School
University of Oxford
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
IT – Then and Now
Automate Technology
Competencies Generalized
Knowledge Cost Reductions Technology
Knowledge Acquiring Knowledge
Transform Human
Competencies Specialized
Knowledge Value Creation Strategic
Knowledge Continuous Learning
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
Innovation from Outsourcing
Is this a paradox or a necessity? Does anyone really expect innovation? What kind of innovation do they want –
incremental or radical Is anyone happy with their innovation
outcomes?
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
The Innovation Process
Client Supplier
Relationship
Innovation
- Sourcing Strategy- Core Capabilities
- Formal R&D Structure- Workforce Development
- Attitudes to Innovation
- Length of Contract- Innovation as a Goal?- Obligations- Power Sharing- Division of Risks/Benefits- Trust
-Types of Innovation- New Technology Development/Adoption- New Business Processes- New IT Management Processes
- Benefits - Lower Costs/Efficiency-Competitive Advantage
- Perceptions of Innovation- Expectations of Innovation
- Client-industry scope- Knowledge Transfer Practices- Scope of Services Delivered- Workforce Development- Attitudes to Innovation
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
Alignment of Interests Three categories of Alignment – Natural, Unimportant,
Unnatural How do we make sure that our goals align with our
outsourcing partner? Different steps for each situation
Natural Alignment – easiest category – metrics are difficult but not terribly important
Unimportant – metrics become the key driver – telephone services is an example where alignment can sometimes be considered unimportant
Unnatural – Relationship management becomes critical – Expectations and perceptions must be managed constantly
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
Prerequisites for Innovation - Trust
Trust is required for innovation
Typically starts out high-initial euphoria over completed deal
Top management must set the proper expectations
Starts decreasing with initial operational difficulties
Begins to recover after relationship matures
Typical Trust Life-cycle
Trust
Time - Years
1 2 3 4
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
Prerequisites for Innovation - CIO
Some organizations think that an outsourcing deal eliminates the imperative for a strong CIO
Strategic direction can typically only come from the CIO – someone must aggregate all the competing requirements for resources
Firms without a strong CIO tend to complain that their outsourcer is not proactive with innovative ideas
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
Prerequisites for Innovation – Absorptive Capacity
What is absorptive capacity? Are we an intelligent customer? The role of retained IT – Technical
Troubleshooter or Horizon ScannerFrequently the outsourcing firm feels that the
retained IT personnel “get in the way”
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
Prerequisites for Innovation – Absorptive Channel and Process
How do we get ideas into the relationship?What communications processes are in placeHow broad are those processes
What do we do with these ideas? Is there a defined innovation process?Project management skills are key?Leadership must shift role from supervisor to
sponsor/champion
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
Risks and Rewards Risk management is not risk elimination Risk sharing must be sorted Value estimation is difficult
Outsourcing brings cost transparency Outsourcing does not bring benefit transparency
Reward sharing arrangements tend to be less difficult—however, realization of rewards is difficult to measure
Even the most savvy customers cannot always resist the temptation to focus on costs and not value
Again trust rears its head – Risk/Reward sharing requires trust
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
The Innovation Paradox Trust is required for innovation Operational efficiency tends to build trust Innovation disrupts the status quo which causes
operational difficulties Operational difficulties decrease trust Therefore, a highly innovative environment risks
weakening trust Therefore, creating an environment of
‘continuous innovation’ becomes extraordinarily difficult
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
Summary - Overcoming the Paradox
Contracts are great at spelling out service requirements—but they are not great at specifying roles and processes
Communication channels must be clear with the necessary breadth and depth
Strategic direction must come from the client CIO—not the outsourcer
Managers must be conscious of the different roles (i.e. supervisor and sponsor) required in order to foster innovation
© 2003, Michael R. Weeks – All Rights Reserved
Thank you!Michael Weeks
Saïd Business SchoolUniversity of OxfordPark End Street Oxford OX1 1HP
Telephone: +44 (0)1869 322 355
http://weeks2000.com