origin of matter
DESCRIPTION
Origin of Matter. HON-3230 Chance, Emergence or Design. GUT’s. Standard Model Quarks Leptons Force carriers String Theory Objects at 10 - 35 m. p. Parallax. Shift in distant objects due to a change in perspective. Satellite Hipparcos Measure 2.5 million stars - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 1
HON-3230
Chance, Emergence or Design
Origin of Matter
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 2
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 3
GUT’s
• Standard Model– Quarks– Leptons– Force carriers
• String Theory– Objects at 1035 m
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 4
Parallax• Shift in distant objects due
to a change in perspective.
• Satellite Hipparcos– Measure 2.5 million stars– Up to 800 ly in distance
p
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 5
Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram• Hot stars
– Bright– Blue
• Cool stars– Dim– Red
• Brightness reduced with distance
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 6
How Big is the Universe?
• Current model 13 billion light years– Single origin– Unique properties
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 7
Accepted Model - IBB
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 8
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 9
Evidences for IBB• Hubble Constant• Nucleosynthesis
– 73% H, 24% He, 3% other
• Microwave Background• Large Scale Structure• Evidence of Dark Matter
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 10
WMAP
• Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe– Sensitivity – 20 K– Resolution – 0.3°– Red – Warmer– Blue - Cooler
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 11
Christianity and Big Bang• Evidence for the Big Bang is
very convincing. • Is. 40:22 – God “stretches
out the heavens.”• It implies a beginning of
space and time.• Parameters of Big Bang so
precise that it would require God to do it.
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 12
Inflation• Universe “too” uniform, therefore, it must have
expanded very quickly.– Within the first 1032 seconds the Universe expands to
from a pin point to 1 m.– Initially the speed of light is exceeded by a factor of
1023
• Quintessence – Additional force that causes the expansion of the universe to increase.
• Chaotic Inflation – Multiple universes randomly appear and wipe out other universes. (Linde)
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 13
v
Time
InitialInflation
SubsequentInflations
Of differentProperties
Chaotic Inflation
Norse Mythology (Gylfaginning)“In the beginningnot anything existed,there was no sand nor seanor cooling waves;earth was unknownand heaven aboveonly Ginnungagap (open void)was --- there was no grass.”
Sturluson (1954)
Greek Mythology (formless void) A Universe from Nothing (Unstable Subtratum)
The presence of gravity prevents additional spontaneous formation due to Conservation of Energy.
An inflationary event can introduce positive mass/energy through a transition from a “false vacuum.”
An inflationary unstable substratum could be generating an infinite number of different types of universes causally disconnected from ours. (Guth)
A Universe from Nothing, Krauss (2012) “This is so strikingly non-intuitive that it can seem almost
magical.” “Our universe is so vast that, as I have emphasized, something
that is not impossible is virtually guaranteed to occur somewhere within it. Rare events happen all the time.”
Spontaneous formation of life and mind Life comes spontaneously from a physical substratum Mind comes spontaneously from a biological substratum Our universe is an epiphenomenon of the cosmic
substratum Critique
Nothingness cannot be examined unless it is physical. Nothingness has properties and obeys laws, but can only
be inferred from conceptual consistency. If everything possible is “virtually guaranteed,” does that
tell us anything about what is real.
Universe from Nothing– “This leads to a radically different view of cosmology, and the
relation between cause and effect. The histories that contribute to the Feynman sum don't have an independent existence, but depend on what is being measured. We create history by our observation, rather than history creating us."
Hawking and Mlodinow (2010)
– “The tapestry that science weaves in describing the evolution of our universe is far richer and far more fascinating than any revelatory images or imaginative stories that humans have concocted. Nature comes up with surprises that far exceed those that the human imagination can generate.”
Krauss (2012)
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 17
“According to M-theory, ours is not the only universe. Instead, M-theory predicts that a great many universes were created out of nothing. Their creation does not require the intervention of some supernatural being or god. Rather, these multiple universes arise naturally from physical law. They are a prediction of science.”
Hawking and Mlodinow (2010)
“The answers that have been obtained – from staggeringly beautiful experimental observations, as well as from the theories that underlie much of modern physics – all suggest that getting something from nothing is not a problem. Indeed, something from nothing may have been required for the universe to come into being. Moreover, all signs suggest that this is how our universe could have arisen.”
Krauss (2010)
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 19
Young Creation Models• How does distant
light get to us?– Light created in
transit.
– Speed of light is slowing down.
– White hole cosmology
– Non-uniform properties of space
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 20
Big Bang Critique• Dark Energy (73%) (Quintessence )
• Dark Matter (23%) (Exotic – Non Baryonic)
• Laws of Thermodynamics
• Inflation– Exceed speed of light by 10×
• Not constrained enough– “...supporters of Big Bang cosmology gain for themselves
a large bag of free parameters that can subsequently be tuned as the occasion may require.” (Burbidge, Hoyle, & Narlikar)
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 21
Modeling Data
1 2x y
2 53 64 75 106 10
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 22
Fundamental Paradox• Wave/Particle Duality
– Electron can be in multiple states at one time.
• Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem– Can not have an all
encompassing theory of everything.
• Finiteness of man
eee
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 23
End of Science?• Positivism
– Progress towards an ultimate understanding of the nature of reality.
• Limitation– All universal models will
be incomplete and possibly paradoxical.
– Does not eliminate the usefulness of the model.
Steven GollmerCedarville University
Universe: Page 24
Current Status of BB Cosmology
• Universe is 13.7 billion years old, with a margin of error of close to 1%. • First stars ignited 200 million years after the Big Bang. • Light in the WMAP picture is from 379,000 years after the Big Bang. • Content of the Universe:
– 4% Atoms, 23% Cold Dark Matter, 73% Dark Energy. – The data places new constraints on the Dark Energy. It seems more like a "cosmological
constant" than a negative-pressure energy field called "quintessence". But quintessence is not ruled out.
– Fast moving neutrinos do not play any major role in the evolution of structure in the universe. They would have prevented the early clumping of gas in the universe, delaying the emergence of the first stars, in conflict with the new WMAP data.
• Expansion rate (Hubble constant) value: Ho= 71 (km/sec)/Mpc (with a margin of error of about 5%)
• New evidence for Inflation (in polarized signal) • For the theory that fits our data, the Universe will expand forever. (The nature of
the dark energy is still a mystery. If it changes with time, or if other unknown and unexpected things happen in the universe, this conclusion could change.)
From http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm/mr_limits.html