“oncología básica” -...
TRANSCRIPT
“Oncología Básica”
How are cancer cells created?...Changes in paradigms
Isidro Sánchez-García ([email protected])
1X Simposium Bases Biológicas del Cáncer y Terapias Personalizadas
Salamanca, 18-19 de Mayo, 2017
1. Alteración proliferación
2. Apoptosis
3. Tumor
4. Angiogénesis
5. Alteraciones genéticas (mutaciones, fusiones génicas, etc.)
6. Clonalidad
¿Cuáles de estas propiedades son carácterísticas del cáncer?
El cáncer surge en un organismo inmuno competente
-Líneas celulares
-Modelos de ratones inmudeprimidos
-Xenografts
LA INVESTIGACIÓN CLÍNICA CARECE DE CONTROLES ADECUADOS:
EL MISMO INDIVIDUO NO PUEDE SER TRATADO Y NO TRATADO
Approvals in 2016: questioning the
clinical benefit of anticancer
therapiesChristopher M. Booth & Joseph
C. Del PaggioPublished online: 20
February 2017p135 |
doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.18Patients
with cancer expect to derive a meaningful
clinical benefit from anticancer
treatments, especially considering that
such therapies are associated with
adverse events and, often, substantial
financial costs. We have evaluated new
anticancer agents approved by the FDA
in 2015 and 2016 using the ESMO
Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale and
ASCO Value Framework, and conclude
that many agents only offer marginal
value.
Why early stages in cancer are important?
Oncogene-celltargetinteraction Clinicalmalignant tumor mass
“billion-cellthreshold”
(Oncologyremissionmeans 0 ---- 109cells)
Cancer within a tissue
normal tissue
Therapeutic target
CSC
Human cancer development
genetic program: -specific cancer cell targets, -biomarkers, -predict cancer response, etc
mouse and human
normal stem cells
are similar
How tostud yearly stages in cancer?
Outline
1- Current model of cancer
2- Tumoral epigeneticstem cell reprogrammimghypothesis
3- Experimental validation and clinical application
4- Implications in the development and treatment of cancer
Current model of cancer
Do the oncogenes have a modeofactionthatisnothomogeneous
throughoutthecancercellpopulation?
-Heterogenous tumor cellcomposition.
-Initiatinggeneticalterationispresent in both CSC anddifferentiated tumor cells.
-Homogenousmodeofactionfor oncogenes withincancercells.
-Briefinactivationof oncogenes can cause cancerremission in modelsystems:oncogeneaddition
-However, unfortunately, thet herapiesbasedonthiscancermodelfailtoeradicatetumours in humans.
Classical model for the role of human cancer gene defects in tumour cell fate specification
Traditionally, the human cancer genetic defects have been thought to act on cells already committed
to a differentiation program, in such a way that the tumoural phenotype is derived from that of the initial differentiated target cell
Alternative model for the role of human cancer gene defects in tumour cell fate specification
Alternativeview in which the oncogenic lesion acts on stem/progenitor cells by imposing
a given, oncogene-specific, tumour-differentiated cell fate.
Human Cancer tissue
Genetic defect is present in both CSC
and differentiated tumor cells
In vivo experimental model of tumoural stem cell reprogramming
Genetic defect is only present in CSC
?
Oncogene-induced plasticity and CSC
Stem cell
compartment CSC proliferating cells
Stem cell
compartment Differentiated cells
Genotype Phenotype
Translocation Genetic
product Tumour type
t(12;16)(q13;p11) FUS-DDIT3 Myxoid Liposarcoma
t(16;21)(p11;q22) FUS-ERG Acute myeloid leukaemia
t(9;22)(q34;q11) BCR-ABLp190 B acute lymphoblastic
leukaemia
t(9;22)(q34;q11) BCR-ABLp210 Chronic myeloid
leukaemia
t(9;22)(q34;q11) BCR-ABLp230 Chronic neutrophilic
leukemia
t( ?;3)( ?;q27) ?+ BCL6 DLBCL/ Follicular
lymphoma
In vivo experimental model of tumoural stem cell reprogramming
EMBO J. 28(1):8-20 (2009).
Cell Cycle 8:1314-1318 (2009)
N Engl J Med. 360(3):297-299 (2009)
1- Proof of principle experiment
2- Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) stem cells are not oncogene addicted and the therapies
that biochemically target BCR-ABL do not eliminate them (CML stem cells).
3-First animal model aniticipating human clinical results in the CSC field
4-Results were confirmed in human patients two years later
Ewing
sarcoma
CML
Synovial
sarcoma
B-
cellhyperplas
ia
Multiplemyel
oma
MALT
lymphoma
ABC-
DLBCL
Stem/Progenitor
cell
BCR-
ABLp210
EWS-
FLI-1
SYT-
SSX2
HGAL
MafB
MALT1
BCL6
Oncogene. 2012.
Genes & development. 2010.
Nature communications. 2014.
Nature communications. 2013.
Proc NatlAcadSci USA. 2012.
Cell Cycle. 2012.
Embo J. 2012.
Cell Cycle. 2012.
Cell Cycle. 2012.
EmboJ. 2009.
The New England journal of medicine. 2009.
Cell Cycle. 2009.
Otherpatholo
gies?
¿?
Are there evidences of tumoral epigenetic stem cell reprogramming??
CSC
compartment
Tumor
differentiated cells
Normal
differentiated cells Normal stem cell
compartment
Wt Stem Cells
Cancer Stem Cells
Wt B Cells
Tumor B Cells
Segmean. HpaII
Se
gm
ea
n. M
sp
I
Red points are the 323
CSC-specific differentially
hypomethylated genes
Identification of a cytosine hypomethylation signature in Sca1-Bcl6
Tumourstem cell reprogramming and therapeutic implications
Reprogramming the cancer epigenome to an alternative lineage cell fate, non-tumoral fate, losing their malignancy?
Tumour stem cell reprogramming largely relies on epigenetic modifications. These, unlike genetic changes, can be erased, manipulated, and
reinitiated, thereforeimplying that anti-tumour reprogramming strategies can provide a new window of opportunity to interfere with the cancer
fate-inducing change.
CSCs do not have oncogene addition
Oncogenes cannot be used as a target to kill CSCs
BUT, Tumour stem cell reprogramming is a specific CSC target
Could we use it to prevent/kill CSCs?
Cancer progression also involves CSC evolution
Evolutionary speciation or ancestral tree, from
Charles Darwin’s 1837 Transmutation notebook B
Semin Cancer Biol. 2010
Geneticapproachtoidentify CSC maintenance genes and
genes/locires ponsible for different therapeutic response, etc
F1 B6 x FVB
X
Resistant strain (B6)
Susceptible Strain (FvB)
High CANCER phenotype variability (tumor
phenotype and genetics)
Population with high genetic variability primed for CANCER
(inherited and/or adquired susceptibilities)
potential
environmental
riskfactors/
carcinogentostu
dy gene-
enviromentinter
actions
F1 Backcross
±
Study physiological variability
Different risk factor exposure
susceptibility
Study genomic (SNPs) and epigenetic variability
before and after to identify risk factors
Human
Mouse
Infection
exposure
No Infection exposure
PAX5Δ/+
Pax5+/-
Pax5+/- Pax5+/-
Pax5Δ/-
PAX5Δ/-
Susceptible
pre-B cell
pB-ALL
pB-ALL
A
C
D
Susceptible
pre-B cell Preleukemic
pre-B cell
? B
?
PAX5Δ/+ PAX5Δ/+
CancerDiscov. 2015 Sep 25. pii: CD-15-0892
Aging. 2015 Sep;7(9):607-8
Therealisationthatidentifyingthisnewdiseasemechanismisnot, to
paraphrase Winston Churchill, "theend, orthebeginningoftheend,
butperhapstheendofthebeginning”.
Churchill, W.S.C. Speech at the Lord Mayor’s Luncheon, MansionHouse, London. November 10th, 1942
IBMCC (CSIC/USAL)
Salamanca
Inés González Herrero
Carolina Vicente Dueñas
Idoia García Ramírez
Alberto Martín Lorenzo
Guillermo Rodríguez Hernández
Xiomara Guerrero
Ana Gavilán
Sara Glez de Tena-Dávila
Isidro Sánchez-García
Universidad Salamanca
Hospital Clínico Univ.
Teresa Flores
Oscar Blanco
MD Ludeña
Juan Jesús Cruz
César A. Rodríguez
Gonzalo Varela
Concha Roman
Fco Javier Garcia Criado
Rafael Jiménez
Alberto Orfao
IMP Vienna
Meinrad Busslinger
Transgenic Unit
CNB-CBMSO
Belén Pintado
Verónica Domínguez
Lymphoma
CIMA- Pamplona
Jose A. Martinez-Climent
U. Miami-USA
Izidore Lossos
Cornell Institute (NY)
Ari Melnick
IMB- Salamanca Dionisio Martín-Zanca
Imperial-London
Cristina Lo Celso
Sanger Institute-Cambridge
Natalie Conte
Allan Bradley
Leukemia/BCR-ABL
CBMSO Madrid
César Cobaleda
IBMCC-Salamanca
Alberto Orfao
CBMSO Madrid César Cobaleda
Multyple myeloma
IBMCC-Salamanca
JF San Miguel/Norma
CNIO Madrid
Mariano Barbacid
USC-Santiago Compostela
Angel Carracedo
Lung & Breast
IBMCC-Salamanca
Jesus Perez-Losada
Stanford-USA
Ash Alizadeh
Pediatric leukemia/lymphoma
Med.Uni-Duesseldorf
Arndt Borkhardt
MDACC-USA
Michael Green
Thetypesofcancersconsideredrangefromthose so rarethatinterestedscientistsprobably outnumberaffectedindividualstothenew plague ofepithelialtumors. Wemake no apologyforincludingrarecancers. The case fortheirstudywas made long ago by William Harvey in a letterwritten in 1657, justbeforehisdeath: ”Natureisnowhere wanttoreveal her innermostsecrets more openlythanwhenshe shows faint traces of herselfawayfromthebeatentrack. Noristhereanysurerroutetotheproperpractice of medicine thanifsomeonegiveshismindovertodiscerningthecustomarylawof naturethroughthecarefulinvestigationofdiseasesthat are ofrareoccurrence” Understandingofrarecancerdiseasecontinuestoprovideprofoundinsightsintobiological processes. Harvey, W. TheCirculationoftheBloodandOtherWritings. Edited by KJ Franklin. London: Everyman’sLibrary, Dent, Dutton;1963: 209.
Wemake no apologyforincludingrarecancers