npi evaluation of college summit

6
NONPROFIT INVESTOR INDEPENDENT RESEARCH FOR PHILANTHROPY Nonprofit Investor Research | nonprofitinvestor.org SUMMARY College Summit was created by a former academic advisor at Harvard University who saw the need to create a program to assist both top performing and mid-tier low-income students in securing college admission. The founder, himself a graduate of an inner-city Denver high school, saw that students with mid-tier credentials, many of whom he believed could have succeeded in college, lacked the know-how and senior year support that students whose parents had gone to college enjoyed. STRENGTHS Management team strength. College Summit has augmented its management team as the organization has grown without outsized increases to its operating expense base. Strong national and regional recognition. College Summit has been widely recognized and is the recipient of various national and regional awards attesting to the broad impact of the organization’s programs. The organization is constantly under review by various awarding and review organizations. CAUTIONS Expense trend/profile. Total operating expenses have grown in the last 3 years. However, College Summit has managed to decrease the share of G&A expenses in the last year. The fiscal 2011 level was also below the fiscal 2009 level. Expenses currently exceed revenues. Operating expenses in fiscal 2009 and 2011 exceeded revenues. In 2010, revenues did exceed expenses, but only as a result of several extraordinary one-time contributions. In response to this trend, College Summit’s senior leadership has recently enacted a program to “right size” organization expenses through a reorganization of paid leadership. Additionally, College Summit’s recently enacted budget plan is aimed at increasing revenues and reducing expenses to a level where annual revenues can cover annual expenses. It is not uncommon for growing non-profit organizations to experience a similar dynamic between revenues and expenses in a rapid-growth phase. RECOMMENDATION: BUY College Summit’s strong operational track record coupled with a bright outlook is only further supported by the careful selection and development of a world-class leadership team. Not unlike many other highly-success high-growth non-profit organizations, College Summit has experienced some issues with the fast pace of growth. Ultimately, we believe the organization’s past results, wide reach and strong leadership team create a compelling combination for a likely successful organization aimed at increasing educational access in the U.S. College Summit Nonprofit Investor Rating: BUY Mission Statement College Summit’s mission is to help bright, low- income students who, with the right support during the post-secondary transition, can propel their lives (and communities) in a positive direction. Over the past decade, College Summit has worked in partnership with schools, school districts and colleges to develop a sustainable model for raising college enrollment rates community-wide. Financial Overview $ in MM, Fiscal Year Ended April 30 2009 2010 2011 Total Revenue $14.0 $29.6 $13.8 Operating Expenses $18.7 $18.9 $19.1 % of Total: Program Expenses 77.3% 76.7% 80.5% G&A 12.9% 15.8% 12.0% Fundraising 9.7% 7.4% 7.5% Source: College Summit 2009, 2010 and 2011 Form 990s. Tax accounting method used. Year Founded: 1993 Contact Details College Summit 1763 Columbia Road, NW; 2 nd Floor Washington, DC 20009 (202) 319-1763 www.collegesummit.org EIN: 52-2007028 Analyst: Burt Y. Chao Peer Review: Nadia Anggraini & Jason Schifman Publication Date August 17, 2012

Upload: nonprofit-investor

Post on 13-Jan-2015

453 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

www.nonprofitinvestor.org

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NPI Evaluation of College Summit

NONPROFIT INVESTOR I N D E P E N D E N T R E S E A R C H F O R P H I L A N T H R O P Y

Nonprofit Investor Research | nonprofitinvestor.org

SUMMARY

College Summit was created by a former academic advisor at Harvard

University who saw the need to create a program to assist both top

performing and mid-tier low-income students in securing college admission.

The founder, himself a graduate of an inner-city Denver high school, saw

that students with mid-tier credentials, many of whom he believed could

have succeeded in college, lacked the know-how and senior year support

that students whose parents had gone to college enjoyed.

STRENGTHS

▲ Management team strength. College Summit has augmented its

management team as the organization has grown without outsized

increases to its operating expense base.

▲ Strong national and regional recognition. College Summit has been

widely recognized and is the recipient of various national and regional

awards attesting to the broad impact of the organization’s programs. The

organization is constantly under review by various awarding and review

organizations.

CAUTIONS

● Expense trend/profile. Total operating expenses have grown in the last 3

years. However, College Summit has managed to decrease the share of G&A

expenses in the last year. The fiscal 2011 level was also below the fiscal

2009 level.

● Expenses currently exceed revenues. Operating expenses in fiscal 2009

and 2011 exceeded revenues. In 2010, revenues did exceed expenses, but

only as a result of several extraordinary one-time contributions. In response

to this trend, College Summit’s senior leadership has recently enacted a

program to “right size” organization expenses through a reorganization of

paid leadership. Additionally, College Summit’s recently enacted budget

plan is aimed at increasing revenues and reducing expenses to a level where

annual revenues can cover annual expenses. It is not uncommon for

growing non-profit organizations to experience a similar dynamic between

revenues and expenses in a rapid-growth phase.

RECOMMENDATION: BUY

College Summit’s strong operational track record coupled with a bright

outlook is only further supported by the careful selection and development

of a world-class leadership team. Not unlike many other highly-success

high-growth non-profit organizations, College Summit has experienced

some issues with the fast pace of growth. Ultimately, we believe the

organization’s past results, wide reach and strong leadership team create a

compelling combination for a likely successful organization aimed at

increasing educational access in the U.S.

College Summit Nonprofit Investor Rating:

BUY Mission Statement

College Summit’s mission is to help bright, low-income students who, with the right support during the post-secondary transition, can propel their lives (and communities) in a positive direction. Over the past decade, College Summit has worked in partnership with schools, school districts and colleges to develop a sustainable model for raising college enrollment rates community-wide. Financial Overview

$ in MM, Fiscal Year Ended April 30

2009 2010 2011

Total Revenue $14.0 $29.6 $13.8

Operating Expenses $18.7 $18.9 $19.1

% of Total:

Program Expenses 77.3% 76.7% 80.5%

G&A 12.9% 15.8% 12.0%

Fundraising 9.7% 7.4% 7.5%

Source: College Summit 2009, 2010 and 2011 Form 990s. Tax accounting method used.

Year Founded: 1993

Contact Details

College Summit 1763 Columbia Road, NW; 2

nd Floor

Washington, DC 20009 (202) 319-1763 www.collegesummit.org EIN: 52-2007028

Analyst: Burt Y. Chao

Peer Review: Nadia Anggraini & Jason Schifman Publication Date

August 17, 2012

Page 2: NPI Evaluation of College Summit

College Summit | Nonprofit Investor Research 2

OVERVIEW OF COLLEGE SUMMIT’S ACTIVITIES

“College Summit and our school partners, together with our higher education, corporate and philanthropic allies are

committed to the day when every student who can make it in college makes it to college.”

- College Summit Website

Mission and Aim: College Summit aims to build the capacity of schools to increase college-going school- and district-

wide. College Summit attempts to complete this through providing districts and schools with a strategy and tools to

transform college going throughout each district. By equipping students, teachers, counselors, principals and

administrators, College Summit builds the capacity, expectation and excitement for change at all levels. The organization

believes that trained student “influencers” build college-going culture, while teachers and counselors use a managed

curriculum and technology tools to help all students create postsecondary plans and apply to college. College Summit

also promotes data and accountability tools that enable school leaders to manage improved student outcomes.

Methodology: Since inception, College Summit has worked in partnership with schools, school districts and colleges to

develop a sustainable model for raising college enrollment rates community-wide.

College Summit employs a variety of tools and goals to drive the organization’s day to day activities and overall direction:

Comprehensive curriculum that guides students through every stage of planning; and a web site for students to

manage their college application materials that act to introduce post-secondary planning courses for all seniors.

Summer Educators’ Institutes help to equip educators to lead the course, plan lessons, and build a college

culture in the classroom; plus on-site technical assistance throughout the school year from College Summit staff.

This serves to provide teachers and counselors with professional development resources.

Immersion summer Workshops for each school's influential rising seniors, where they complete their entire

college application and are equipped to return to school senior year to motivate their classmates. This serves to

help establish and forge the college going culture promoted by College Summit.

Data management tools that enable the real-time tracking of student postsecondary planning milestones which

further enable teachers and administrators to provide targeted student support. College Summit’s annual

College Enrollment Reports provide data on student outcomes.

Geographic Footprint and Expansion: College Summit has offices in 11 regions across the U.S., including Northern and

Southern California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Indianapolis, New York, the National Capital Region (DC, MD, and

VA), Missouri, South Carolina and West Virginia.

Currently, the organization is looking to increase its presence in its Los Angeles and Miami markets. According to

conversations with the organization’s leadership, the goal is to serve 10,000 students in the Los Angeles area within

three years and eventually get to serve 14,000 students in the greater Miami area.

In addition to focusing on the organization’s 11 core regions, College Summit is actively pursuing a more rapidly scalable

model to expand to areas not currently covered by the organization. Recent progress has been made in the form of

commissioning a three-month study amongst other achievements. While still in its early stages, this strategy would

allow the organization to reach more schools and students with less overhead and capital expense.

Page 3: NPI Evaluation of College Summit

College Summit | Nonprofit Investor Research 3

OVERVIEW OF COLLEGE SUMMIT’S ACTIVITIES (CONTINUED)

Peer Organizations: There are countless non-profit organizations operating in the educational access field. The

organization that most closely resembles College Summit is the National College Access Network (“NCAN”) also based in

Washington D.C. Additionally, many regional or local organization also serve the aim of trying to increase college

enrollment amongst socioeconomically disadvantaged students. However, we believe College Summit is a leader in

promoting peer leadership and development, which creates increasingly independent and autonomous organizations

that enhance the sustainability of College Summit’s programs. Other organizations depend on highly-centralized models

that are both capital and human resource intensive while College Summit’s empowerment of students, teachers and

administrators at the school level creates a unique approach to promoting access to college.

Supporters: The organization has several key “cornerstone supporters” that represent a significant amount of the

support for the organization. In addition to financial contributions and volunteers, these organizations also provide

College Summit with pro bono or highly reduced-rate consulting services and products to further College Summit’s reach

impact. The organization’s top 19 funders in fiscal 2011 represented 49% of contributions. This is down significantly from

16 funders representing 70% of 2010 contributions which reflects a positive decentralization of funding.

Significant College Summit Supports (May 2009 to Present)

$1,000,000+ $10,000 to $249,000 $5,000 to $9,999

Citi Foundation Barry and Evelyn Salzberg Bloomberg L.P.

Deloitte Services LLP Catie Marron David E. Retik & Christopher D. Mello Foundation

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Dan Franks David Moody

Diana Davis Spencer Foundation Howard Schiller

$250,000 to $999,999 Google Inc. Man Investment

BlackRock Joe and Diana DiMenna Stamats

Darden Restaurants Kathleen and Scott Kapnick Foundation

Josh Bekenstein Morgan Stanley Foundation

Karen A. & Kevin W. Kennedy Foundation Paula Cleary and Paul Farrell

Leon Lowenstein Foundation Peter Greene

MetLife Foundation President Barack Obama

New Profit Richard and Mary Elizabeth Ketchum

Stanley & Fiona Druckenmiller Fund Robert K. Steele

Stavros Niarchos Foundation Steve Sacks

Wells Fargo Wallace Foundation, Inc. Source: College Summit Website.

PROGRAM RESULTS AND EFFECTIVENESS

The success of College Summit’s program hinges on the tools the organization provides to partner communities. Partner

districts use College Summit to build a planning infrastructure that fosters a college going culture across each high

school. Currently, College Summit works with over 160 schools and serves in excess of 100,000 students.

Program effectiveness is most directly measured and monitored by college enrollment rates. According to College

Summit, “rising college enrollment rates say a lot about what schools are doing right for their kids. College Summit not

only provides the tools to measure increasing college enrollment rates, but also provides the systems to track student

progress toward this objective.” According to the organization, College Summit participants enroll in college at a rate

22% higher than students who do not participate. Furthermore, partner school districts have increased school-wide

college enrollment by 15 percent, while some schools, like College Summit’s partners in St. Louis saw a 20% increase in

college enrollment rates (New Profit Inc.).

Page 4: NPI Evaluation of College Summit

College Summit | Nonprofit Investor Research 4

PROGRAM RESULTS AND EFFECTIVENESS (CONTINUED)

The organization documents and records this progress. The organization constantly tests and adapts its tools to produce

better results for partner schools. Over the last few years, College Summit has expanded its teacher curriculum, teacher

training, and data tools- all with the involvement and support of partner schools.

TRANSPARENCY

Form 990’s: College Summit provides its latest Form 990 on its website. Historical 990s from fiscal 2008 to 2010 are

available online.

Accounting: College Summit’s 990s employ tax-based accounting methods while its 2010 and 2011 audits are reported

under GAAP accounting standards. The different accounting standards for each type of document results in reported

figures that differ between documents but that are internally consistent.

Audit: College Summit was audited by RAFFA, P.C., an accounting, consulting and technology firm based in Washington

D.C. The scope of the audit covered fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The audit, concluded on January 9, 2012 concluded that

the financial statements included in the report presented fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of College

Summit as of April 30, 2011 and 2010, and that the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the years then ended

in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audit also took into

consideration the internal control over internal controls, but did not cover an opinion on the ultimate effectiveness over

internal controls over financial reporting.

Senior Leadership: When contacted, College Summit’s leadership team was responsive and willing to discuss the details

of their organization. In preparation of this report, we were in contact with several individuals including the

organization’s President, Chief Advancement Officer and Executive Director of Northern California. We were offered

access to numerous other individuals and intend to engage these individuals at a later date.

Web-based Resources: The organization’s website provides detailed information regarding College Summit’s fundraising

activities, operations and related metrics. The organization maintains separate pages for National and Regional

supporters as well as partnership profiles. Form 990’s and audits are also readily available through the website.

FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

Revenue Breakdown Expense Breakdown $ in MM

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

2009 2010 2011

Program Service & Other Contributions & Grants

$ in MM

74%

75%

76%

77%

78%

79%

80%

81%

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

2009 2010 2011Fundraising Management & General

Program Service Program Service as a % of Total

Revenues: In fiscal 2011, College Summit reported $13.8MM in revenue, down 53% from $29.6MM in fiscal 2010, but

down just 1% from 2009. As previously noted, 2010 revenues were elevated due to several one-time extraordinary

contributions that resulted from the organization’s seed funding initiatives during that year.

Page 5: NPI Evaluation of College Summit

College Summit | Nonprofit Investor Research 5

FINANCIAL OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)

Expenses: Total expenses stayed relatively flat between 2009 and 2011. 2009 expenses were $18.7MM while 2010 and

2011 expenses came in at $18.9MM and $19.1MM, respectively.

Operating expenses in fiscal 2009 and 2011 exceeded revenues by 33% and 38%, respectively. In 2010, several, one-time,

non-recurring revenue contributions boosted revenue to levels well above expenses, but as operated in the last several

years, we believe our estimated recurring annual revenue run rate of $13.0 -$15.0MM is inadequate to cover estimated

expenses of approximately $19.0 - $20.0MM per year.

Budget Reconciliation: Encouragingly, College Summit’s senior leadership has recognized this situation and has recently

undergone a “right-sizing” of leadership and further expense rationalization to bring expenses below revenues in the

near-term. While the effects of this program will likely not be fully felt until 2013, this is surely a step in the right

direction. Current asset levels look to be sufficient to bridge College Summit in this transition period. It is important to

note that a financial transition of this nature is very commonplace for non-profit organizations as they mature.

Balance Sheet/Reserves: As of April 30, 2011, College Summit had total assets of $16.2MM, down from $22.3MM in

2011. The organization’s cash balance declined from $1.9MM at the end of fiscal 2010 to $0.3MM at the end of 2011.

Liabilities at the end of fiscal 2011 were $1.1MM, also down from $2.0MM at the end of 2010. A reduction in accounts

payable of $0.7MM accounted for nearly 80% in the year over year reduction in liabilities on the balance sheet. Senior

leadership is aware of the current balance sheet and has adopted a budgetary plan aimed at increasing the organizations

reserves beyond 6 months of operating expenses ($4.8MM at the fiscal 2011 run rate of $19.1MM in annual expenses).

Summary Balance Sheet (as of April 30, 2011)

$ in MM 2010 2011

Current Assets

Cash & Equivalents 1.9$ 0.3$

Other 8.0 4.6

Total Current Assets 9.8 4.9

Total Noncurent Assets 12.5 11.4

TOTAL ASSETS 22.3 16.2

TOTAL LIABILITIES 2.0$ 1.1$

NET ASSETS 20.4$ 15.1$

Related Party Transactions: The only related party transaction disclosed by College Summit is related to a consulting

agreement the organization has with an individual that serves on College Summit’s Board of Directors. In fiscal 2011,

College Summit paid this individual $43,000 for their services, down from $80,000 in fiscal 2010.

Conditional Grants: Since 2008, College Summit has received a significant amount of conditional grants that are

contingent upon a variety of quantitative and qualitative criteria. While management is confident that these conditions

will all be met, it is important to note that if these conditions are not met, College Summit may not receive some

pledged funds. College Summit has recognized portions of each of the conditional grants as ongoing conditions have

been met and will continue to recognize additional portions from the remaining balances. The organization currently has

conditional grants from The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, an unnamed foundation, Barclay’s Global Investors, The

Stavros Niarchos Foundation, SeaChange Capital Partners and New Profit Inc.

Page 6: NPI Evaluation of College Summit

College Summit | Nonprofit Investor Research 6

THIRD PARTY RATINGS

As of May 14, 2012, College Summit had a four (out of four) star rating on Charity Navigator with a 60.85 out of 70.00

composite score.

College Summit received a 65.16 out of 70.00 score for its financials while it received a 58.00 out of 70.00 for accounting

and transparency.

Charity Navigator’s review notes a lack of documentation for the process for determining CEO compensation.

Additionally it notes that a donor privacy policy and audited financial are not readily accessible from College Summit’s

website.

GET INVOLVED

Volunteer with College Summit in a variety of capacities. The most common opportunities are for Writing Coaches and

College Coaches.

Donate to College Summit through the organization’s secure online donation link. Donors can choose to make a tax-

deductible contribution to a specific College Summit region.

Seek Employment with College Summit.

DISCLOSURES

Burt Chao certifies that he does not have any affiliation with College Summit and has never made a donation to the organization. Additionally, Burt has not supported directly competing organizations in a greater capacity than a nominal donation. NPI analysts and NPI as an organization do not receive any form of compensation from reviewed charities.

This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation for donations. While the reliability of information contained in this report has been assessed by NPI, NPI makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness, except with respect to the Disclosure Section of the report. Any opinions expressed herein reflect our judgment as of the date of the materials and are subject to change without notice. NPI has no obligation to update, modify or amend any report or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate, or if research on the subject organization is withdrawn.

Opinions and recommendations in our reports do not take into account specific reader circumstances, objectives, or needs. The recipients of our reports must make their own independent decisions regarding any organization mentioned by NPI.