noisy light spectroscopy a science story darin j. ulness department of chemistry concordia college,...
TRANSCRIPT
Noisy Light SpectroscopyA science story
Darin J. UlnessDepartment of Chemistry
Concordia College, Moorhead, MN
Spectroscopy
Using light to gain information about matter
•Spectra•Transition frequencies•Time dynamics•Absorptivities•Susceptibilities
Information Uses of information•In Chemistry•In Biology•In Engineering
Modern Spectroscopy
Frequency Domain•Measure Spectra•Examples• IR, UV-VIS, Raman
•Material response• Spectrally narrow• Temporally slow
Time Domain•Response to light pulse•Examples• PE, transient abs.
•Material response• Spectrally broad• Temporally fast
Modern Spectroscopy
Frequency Domain•Measure Spectra•Examples• IR, UV-VIS, Raman
•Material response• Spectrally narrow• Temporally slow
Time Domain•Response to light pulse•Examples• PE, transient abs.
•Material response• Spectrally broad• Temporally fast
Time Domain Spectroscopy
Ultrashort pulses are used to excite a molecule
Time Domain Spectroscopy
Ultrashort pulses are used to excite a molecule
Creating Ultrashort Pulses
Fourier Transforms!• Things that happen fast in time require
a broad frequency spectrum• To make a short pulse you need a lot
of colors
Phase Locking
Synchronize the phase of the electric field• Many colors conspire to create a short
pulse• The phases of the different colors
need to be “locked”
Noisy light SpectroscopyUnlock the phase!• The phases of the different colors have
a random relation to one another• Many colors conspire to create a short
pulse coherence time
Ele
tric
Fie
ld S
tren
gth
Time
Noi
sy L
ight
Spe
ctru
m
Frequency
Noisy light SpectroscopyInteracting with molecules• The noisy light is “always on” …it is
quasi-continuous wave• The field may interact with the
molecule at any time
Foundations of Noisy Light
Optical coherence theory
Perturbation theory: Density operator
Noisy Light Spectroscopy
Nonlinear Spectroscopy
P= c ESignal
Material
Light field
Perturbation series approximation
P(t) = P(1) + P(2) + P(3) …
P(1) = c (1)E, P(2) = c (2)EE, P(3) = c (3)EEE
CARS
Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering
w1-w2= wR
wCARS= w1 +wRwR
w1
w1w2
wCARS
Bichromophoric Model
a
b
Noisy light
P(t)(3)
P(s)(3)*
< >
Theoretical Challenges
•Complicated Mathematics•Complicated Physical Interpretation
Difficulty•The cw nature requires all field action permutations. The light is always on.•The proper treatment of the noise cross-correlates chromophores.
New Viewpoint: The c(5) Story
Theoretical Challenges
•Complicated Mathematics•Complicated Physical Interpretation
Difficulty•The cw nature requires all field action permutations. The light is always on.•The proper treatment of the noise cross-correlates chromophores.
FTC Diagram Analysis
Set of intensity level terms
(pre-evaluated)
Set of evaluated intensity level
terms
Messy integration and algebra
Set of FTC diagrams
ConstructionRules
EvaluationRules
Physicshard hard
easy
FTC Diagram Analysis
a
b
P(t,{ti})
P(s,{si})
arrow segments: t-dependent correlation
line segments: t-independent
correlation
I(2)CARS
Monochromator
NarrowbandSource
BroadbandSource
Lens
Sample
Interferometer
t
B
B’
MI(2)CARS
ComputerCCD
•Signal is dispersed onto the CCD
•Entire Spectrum is taken at each delay
•2D data set: the Spectrogram
I(2)CARS: Data Processing
18000 18100 18200 18300 18400
-2
-1
0
1
2
BenzeneT22
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
BenzeneT22
100 200 300 400
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Fourier
Transformation
X-Marginal
I(2)CARS: Hydrogen Bonding
17300 17400 17500 17600
-400
-200
0
200
400
Pyridine
17300 17400 17500 17600
-400
-200
0
200
400
Pyridine
17300 17400 17500 17600
-400
-200
0
200
400
ave x.45 pyr_water
FT
NeatPyridine
Pyridine/Water Xw= 0.55
I(2)CARS: Hydrogen Bonding
I(2)CARS: Halogen BondingPyridine and C3F7I
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
900 920 940 960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 1080 1100
Frequency (cm-1)
Norma
lized In
tensity
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Neat
C6F13I and Pyridine
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
900 920 940 960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 1080 1100Frequency (cm-1)
Norma
lized In
tesity
Neat
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
.8
0.9
Halogen Bonding
Electropositves-hole
Test Charge
Electroneutral“ring”
Electronegative“belt”
Photosynthesis
AcknowledgementsStudentsTheoryJahan DawlatyDan BiebighauserJohn GregioreDuffy TurnerKurt HaagIssac HeathCarena Daniels
Other Group MembersDr. Mark Gealy, Department of PhysicsDr. Eric Booth, Post-doctoral researcherDr. Haiyan Fan, Post-doctoral researcher
FundingNSF CAREER Grant CHE-0341087Henry Dreyfus Teacher/Scholar programConcordia Chemistry Research Fund
Method DevelopmentPye Phyo AungTanner SchulzLindsay WeiselKrista CosertPerrie ColeAlex HarshBritt BergerZach JohnsonThao Ta
Hydrogen/Halogen bondingEric BergJeff EliasonDiane MolivaJason OlsonScott FlancherDanny Green
PhotosynthesisBecca HendricksonMeghan KnudtzonDylan HowieBobby Spoja