navy • leed • commissioning · navy • leed • commissioning • 2010 navfac symposium • 1...

NAVY • LEED • COMMISSIONING2010 NAVFAC Symposium • 1 December 2010David Bylund AIA LEED-AP • Architects Hawaii

NAVY • LEED • COMMISSIONING • 2010 NAVFAC SYMPOSIUM • 1 DECEMBER 2010

• LEED v3• Navy & Sustainability• Commissioning• Lessons Learned

INTRODUCTION


LEED v3


LEED v3

What's different from v2.2• Harmonization• Credit Weightings• Regionalization


LEED v3

What's different from v2.2• Credit requirements


LEED v3

What's different from v2.2• Minimum Project Requirements


LEED v3

What's different from v2.2• Regional Credits

• Hawaii• Guam• Outside US

SSc6WEc2 (25%)WEc3 (62.5%)EAc1 (80 rating / 30 percentile)EAc4 (12%/100%)MRc5

WEc1WEc2WEc3EAc1EAc3EAc5

???


LEED v3

What's different from v2.2• Addenda


LEED v3

What's different from v2.2• GBCI• CIRs


LEED v3

What's different from v2.2• LEED-Online


NAVY & SUSTAINABILITY

MOUGuiding Principles EO 13423 EPACT 2005

Federal Mandates & Policy

ECB 2008-01 NDAA 2007NAVFAC Policy

EO 13514 EISA 2007



MOUGuiding Principles

EPACT 2005EISA 2007


ECB 2008-01

For FY11 & beyond:

• LEED v3 Silver rating

• USGBC certified (process)*

• EPAct 2005 as codified under US Code 10 CFR 433 & 435

• E.O. 13424, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy and Transportation Management

ECB 2009-02: Addresses LEED 2009

EO 13423

NAVFAC Policy

EO 13514


EPACT 2005

EISA 2007

NDAA 2007




ECB 2008-01

EO 13423

NAVFAC Policy

EO 13514

Federal Leadership in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings MOU (Jan 2006)

• Outlines the Guiding Principles for Federal Leadership in high Performance and Sustainable Buildings (Guiding Principles)





ECB 2008-01

EO 13423 (Jan 2007)

• 15% of Building Inventory must be “Sustainable” by 2015 (LEED certified or similar)

• At least 50% of statutory renewable goals come from new sources (1999+)

• Reduce Water consumption 2% / year from a 2007 baseline (20% by 2020)

• Codified by Congress via 2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act

EO 13423 EPACT 2005

EO 13514 EISA 2007





ECB 2008-01

EO 13514 (Oct 2009)

• Reduce GHG Emissions 34% from a 2008 Baseline

• 100% of New buildings, designed after 2020, must be fully “Zero Net Energy” by 2030

EO 13423 EPACT 2005

EO 13514 EISA 2007





ECB 2008-01

EO 13423 EPACT 2005

NDAA 2007NAVFAC Policy

EO 13514 EISA 2007

EPACT 2005

• New federal buildings shall achieve energy savings 30% below ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2004.

• Renewable Electricity “Consumption” -3% by 2009, 5% by 2012, 7.5% by 2013

• Electrical Metering on all Federal Buildings by 2012 (EiSA added Gas/ Steam by ’16)

• Purchase 100% Alt Fuel Vehicles (extent practical)


EO 13423 EPACT 2005

NDAA 2007NAVFAC Policy

EO 13514 EISA 2007




ECB 2008-01

EISA 2007

• Reduce Energy Consumption per SF 3%/YR, 30% total by 2015

• New construction/renovations >$2.5M, reduce facility fossil fuel use by 55% by 2010 and 100% by 2030

• 20% reduction in vehicle petroleum and 10% increase in Alternative Fuel use by 2020

• Comprehensive Energy Audits of 100% of buildings on a 4-year cycle (starting in 2012)

• Increases LCC Analysis from 25 to 40 yrs

• Min. 30% of Building Domestic Hot Water by Solar (unless not LCC effective compared to other available technologies)


EO 13423 EPACT 2005

NAVFAC Policy

EO 13514 EISA 2007




ECB 2008-01

NDAA’07

• “Produce or Procure” 25% of Electricity used from Renewable sources by 2025

• Alternative Fuel Stations at each Fleet Fuel Center >100KGAL/YR by 2010

NDAA 2007


EO 13423 EPACT 2005

NDAA 2007

EO 13514 EISA 2007




ECB 2008-01

NAVFAC Policy mandates two LEED Sustainable Site (SS) credits to meet LEED Silver certification

• SS 6.1 Stormwater Design -Quantity Control

• SS 6.2 Stormwater Design -Quality Control

Applicable Unified Facility Criteria

• UFC 3-210-10 Low Impact Development (LID)

• UFC 4-030-01 Sustainable Development

NAVFAC Policy



Federal Mandates & Policy – and LEEDSSc6 Stormwater Design ECB 2008-01 NAVFAC, EISA

WEc1 Water-Efficient Landscaping ECB 2008-01 MOU, EPAct

WEc3 Water Use Reduction ECB 2008-01 MOU, EPAct

EAp1 Fundamental Commissioning ECB 2008-01 MOU, EPAct

EAp2 Minimum Energy Compliance EPAct, EISA

EAc1 Optimize Energy Performance – 30% ECB 2008-01 EPAct, EISA

EAc2 On-Site Renewable energy EPAct, NDAA, EISA

EAc3 Enhanced Commissioning MOU, EPAct

EAc4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management ECB 2008-01

EAc5 Measurement & Verification ECB 2008-01 EPAct



Federal Mandates & Policy – and LEEDEAc6 Green Power EPAct, NDAA, EISA

MRc2 Construction Waste Management ECB 2008-01 Federal Waste Diversion Reqts.

MRc4 Recycled Content ECB 2008-01 EPA Procurement Guidelines

MRc6 Rapidly Renewable Materials ECB 2008-01 USDA Biobased Pref. Procurement Prog.

MRc7 Certified Wood ECB 2008-01

EQc4 Low Emitting Materials ECB 2008-01

EQc7.1 Thermal Comfort: Design ECB 2008-01

EQc8.1 Daylighting ECB 2008-01

IDc1.1 Moisture Control Plan ECB 2008-01

IDc1.2 Bio-based Products ECB 2008-01 USDA Biobased Pref. Procurement Prog.

IDc2 LEED Accredited Professional ECB 2008-01



Directives for LEED• Design Transition RFP

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN / LEEDA. STANDARDS AND REFERENCES

• LEED, EPAct, ASHRAE, ECB…B. FUNCTIONAL AND TECHNICAL

REQUIREMENTS• LEED, EPAct

C. DESIGN OBJECTIVE• Minimum 50 LEED points

D. LEED IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES• Details of design team’s

approaches to specific credits• Options for more than minimum

50 pointsE. LEED ASSUMPTIONS

• Actions / conditions assumed by NAVFAC



• Reference: www.WBDG.org

www.wbdg.org/references/pa_dod_sust.php



• Project delivery

design constructionpre-design occupancy

fundamental commissioning

enhanced commissioning

1391

D/B

RFP

star

t PC

AS

end

PCA

S

$> $> $> $>

$>



• Accountability • Failure to achieve Silver

certification • Achievement of more

than Silver certification• Failure of government to

fulfill 5-year commitments -> failure of contract?


• Commissioning - Cx•General•Fundamental•Enhanced

• Commissioning authority - CxA• OPR: Owner’s Project Requirements

• BOD: Basis of Design• Pre-functional and functional testing

• Commissioning plan, commissioning report

COMMISSIONING

• Terminology


• Commissioning•General•Fundamental•Enhanced

• Commissioning authority, • OPR: Owner’s Project Requirements

• BOD: Basis of Design• Pre-functional and functional testing

• Commissioning plan, commissioning report

COMMISSIONING

• Terminology• Energy & water systems

descriptions, efficiency goals and metrics

• Communications goals and strategies

• IEQ standards; pollutant sources; CO2 monitoring

• Space requirements: comfort, controls, noise

• Applicable codes, standards• Operations, maintenance, training

requirements• Typical daily use• Response to issues, complaints,

emergencies


•HVAC

•Refrigeration

•Lighting & daylighting controls

•Domestic hot water

•Renewable energy

COMMISSIONING

Commissioning scope• Systems


• Designate CxA• Report directly to Owner• Independent of AE team

• OPR, BOD• Cx requirements in CDs

• Design review in CDs• Cx plan: develop, implement• Review Contractor submittals• Verify installation and performance of

commissioned systems• Systems operations manual• Training program• Summary Cx report• Operations review within 10 months

COMMISSIONING

• LEED requirements for commissioning• Fundamental• Enhanced


• CxA

• Owner

• AE team, mechanical engineer in particular

• Contractor

• LEED administrator

COMMISSIONING

• Roles & responsibilities


a. Executive Order 13423 Technical Guidance Commissioning

b. Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. (PECI) • www.peci.org

c. Model Commissioning Plan and Guide Specifications

d. Building Commissioning Association (BCA) • www.bcxa.org

e. Building Commissioning (WBDG) • www.wbdg.org/project/

buildingcomm.phpf. AABC Commissioning Group (ACG)

• www.commissioning.org

COMMISSIONING

• More information


COMMISSIONING

• Lessons learned: Funding, Phases

design constructionpre-design occupancy

fundamental commissioning

enhanced commissioning

1391

D/B

RFP

star

t PC

AS

end

PCA

S

$> $> $> $>

$>


1. Commissioning scope reviewa. Commissioning specification sectionb. Commissioning planc. Roles and responsibilitiesd. Reportinge. CxA scope schedule

2. Schedule:a. Coordinated Cx / TAB / Flushout scheduleb. Detailed Cx schedule

i. Pre-functional testingii. Functional testingiii. Trainingiv. Reporting

c. Coordination with contractor, subcontractors3. HVAC controls; impact on Cx schedule4. Document review: status of review of document

revisions.5. Submittal comments:

a. Review pathb. Status of Owner review of CxA comments

on relevant project submittalsc. Outstanding comments review

6. Other issues

COMMISSIONING

• Lessons learned• Enhanced

commissioning as predictable credit

• OPR & BOD• Cx kickoff and team

coordination


• Removed Cx references from the QC Section

• Inserted a GENERAL COMMISSIONING Section (01 91 13)

• For the Cx of HVAC section, we changed the format of the Pre-Functional Performance Test Checklist and Functional Performance Test.

• Forms were tailored for the project and simplified.

• Revisions made in concert with CxA.

COMMISSIONING

• Lessons learned• Specifications

Report from recent project team:• No UFGS for Cx in general. • UFGS for Cx of HVAC (23 08 00.00

10)• Current UFGS folds in Fundamental

Cx into the QC Section (01 45 00.00 20)

• Project team added: • Cx of Plumbing (22 08 00)• Cx of Electrical Systems (26 07

00)• Cx of Photovoltaic Systems (48

01 00)


COMMISSIONING

• Lessons learned• Submittal review

projectsubmittalslist

Cx submittals

list

Contractor

AEteam

Cx submittal

sCx

Owner


COMMISSIONING

• Lessons learned• Schedule coordination

functional testingTAB building flush-out

pre-functional testing reporting, training


LESSONS LEARNED

• Guam issues• Recycling• Stormwater• PVs


LESSONS LEARNED

• Recycled content, and other materials credits


LESSONS LEARNED

• PVs• Costs, funding

mechanisms• PPAs• Federal goals• Installation-specific

goals• Location-specific

issues

ECB 2010-05• New construction and major

renovation projects beginning with the POM 2012 MILCON program

• Facility Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) projects beginning in FY10

• Where design requirements do not substantially impact project execution.

• Marine Corps Community Service (MCCS) is enjoined to comply with this guidance where feasible.

All new construction and major renovation projects requiring complete roof replacements will incorporate roof top solar thermal and/or photovoltaic systems.


LESSONS LEARNED

• RECs accessibility• Relative cost / value• Federal goals• Navy and federal

government abilities

$

REC


Specific language with regards to updated monthly information. • In UFGS providing updated

data is somewhat buried within updating the LEED Notebook.

Clarified references to include USGBC addenda up to a post date.

LESSONS LEARNED

• Specifications• UF Guide Specs

"L" designation for submittals• To identify items required to

be reviewed by the LEED Administrator

• To reinforce LEED Admin receipt


Designated a title to a specific Contractor's LEED personnel. "Contractor's LEED Coordinator" (CLC) • Shall be named in the LEED

Implementation Plan.List each credit that the Contractor has some role in, even if referenced to another location.

LESSONS LEARNED

• Specifications• UF Guide Specs

Language for contractor to use LEED online. • UFGS may have been

written for hardcopy templates.

Statement that despite it being a metric project, LEED documentation is in imperial units.


For example:• Minimum Performance

Requirements• EAp1: Fundamental

Commissioning• EQp2: Environmental Tobacco

Smoke Control• EQc7.2: Thermal Comfort –

Verification

LESSONS LEARNED

• Owner signatories• Minimum performance

requirements• LEED credit

requirements


UFC 4-030-01The key to providing a sustainable facility is the integrated design process. The integrated design, or “whole building,” approach involves interaction between all issues, objectives and life-cycle requirements, as well as between the customer, user, designer, consultants, and contractor early on (in the project planning stage) and throughout the project development process. This fosters a multidisciplinary project team and allows them to develop creative solutions that yield multiple benefits.

LESSONS LEARNED

• Integrated design• Owner• AE team• Contractor


NAVY • LEED • COMMISSIONING2010 NAVFAC Symposium • 1 December 2010David Bylund AIA LEED-AP • Architects Hawaii

navy • leed • commissioning · navy • leed • commissioning • 2010 navfac symposium • 1...

Documents