national urban policy - sjshire.wa.gov.au · $ 384 $ 381 $ 460 $ 508 median household income...
TRANSCRIPT
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Community of interest Similar characteristics of residents Communities of shared interests and facilities Newspaper circulation Government agency boundaries Commonwealth and State electoral boundaries Locality boundaries Sense of Place/Identity/Belonging Local context Regional context Demographic Trends Population forecasts Local context Key drivers of change Regional context Demographic composition Regional context
Appropriate planning for current and projected population characteristics and classification of high growth and low growth areas
History of the Area
Local Government
Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage
Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage
Index of Economic Resources
Index of Education and Occupation
Armadale 966 986 1013 931 Kwinana 937 958 993 896 Mandurah 973 991 1019 928 Murray 955 984 1025 916 Rockingham 994 1014 1036 943 Serpentine Jarrahdale
1016 1048 1098 955
SEIFA Indexes
Similar characteristics of residents
Variable Armadale Kwinana Mandurah Murray Rockingham SJ Selected Characteristics Australian Citizenship
84.3%
78.7%
84.9%
86.4%
83.0%
87%
Indigenous Persons (comprises Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander)
2.8% 4.0% 1.5% 1.3% 1.4% 0.9%
Speaks English only 88.5% 83.0% 90.2% 91.0% 89.3% 92% Family Characteristics Couple family with children
44.2%
43.8%
35.6%
38.4%
45.9%
51.1%
Couple family without children
36.4% 37.0% 48.9% 49.6% 38.4% 38.1%
One parent families 18.0% 17.8% 14.6% 11.2% 14.7% 10.1% Other families 1.3% 1.4% 0.9% 0.8% 1.0% 0.7% Income Median individual income ($/weekly)
$ 450
$ 434
$ 384
$ 381
$ 460
$ 508
Median household income ($/weekly)
$ 989 $ 891 $ 810 $ 872 $1,037 $1,233
Median family income ($/weekly)
$1,126 $1,053 $1,038 $1,058 $1,168 $1,334
Similar characteristics of residents
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Community of interest Similar characteristics of residents Communities of shared interests and facilities Newspaper circulation Government agency boundaries Commonwealth and State electoral boundaries Locality boundaries Sense of Place/Identity/Belonging Local context Regional context Demographic Trends Population forecasts Local context Key drivers of change Regional context Demographic composition Regional context
Appropriate planning for current and projected population characteristics and classification of high growth and low growth areas
History of the Area
Communities of shared interests and facilities
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Byford
Mundijong
Serpentine
Darling Downs
Jarrahdale
Keysbrook
Oakford
Cardup
Mardella
Average
Plac
e of
Res
iden
ce
Percentage of Community Use
Armadale Byford Kwinana Mandurah
Perth Rockingham Serpentine Other
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Community of interest Similar characteristics of residents Communities of shared interests and facilities Newspaper circulation Government agency boundaries Commonwealth and State electoral boundaries Locality boundaries Sense of Place/Identity/Belonging Local context Regional context Demographic Trends Population forecasts Local context Key drivers of change Regional context Demographic composition Regional context
Appropriate planning for current and projected population characteristics and classification of high growth and low growth areas
History of the Area
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Community of interest Similar characteristics of residents Communities of shared interests and facilities Newspaper circulation Government agency boundaries Commonwealth and State electoral boundaries Locality boundaries Sense of Place/Identity/Belonging Local context Regional context Demographic Trends Population forecasts Local context Key drivers of change Regional context Demographic composition Regional context
Appropriate planning for current and projected population characteristics and classification of high growth and low growth areas
History of the Area
RLF Inc.
PCDG 5 LGAs PHCC PDC
Terms of Reference: Peel 2020 Strategic Plan
Rolling 10 Year Implementation Plan and Financial Plan Regional Priority Projects
Role Responsibility $s Timeframe
1 Old Mandurah Traffic Bridge
Lead Facilitation Advocacy
City of Mandurah PDC Shires of Murray, SJ and Boddington
$100 M Total = $10M Loan + $85M Fed Grant + $5M CLGF
2015
RDA
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
2 7* 11 3 1* 8 5 6* 9 10
14* 4 19 12 17 13 18 15 20 16*
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
RLF
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 City of Mandurah
Shire of Murray
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Community of interest Similar characteristics of residents Communities of shared interests and facilities Newspaper circulation Government agency boundaries Commonwealth and State electoral boundaries Locality boundaries Sense of Place/Identity/Belonging Local context Regional context Demographic Trends Population forecasts Local context Key drivers of change Regional context Demographic composition Regional context
Appropriate planning for current and projected population characteristics and classification of high growth and low growth areas
History of the Area
• Eleventh fastest growing local government in Australia
• Fifth fastest growing in Western Australia • Current population 19,825 • Estimated population of 51,094 by 2031 • 5.5% average annual growth rate • 158% increase on current population
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Community of interest Similar characteristics of residents Communities of shared interests and facilities Newspaper circulation Government agency boundaries Commonwealth and State electoral boundaries Locality boundaries Sense of Place/Identity/Belonging Local context Regional context Demographic Trends Population forecasts Local context Key drivers of change Regional context Demographic composition Regional context
Appropriate planning for current and projected population characteristics and classification of high growth and low growth areas
History of the Area
ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY Economic factors
Regional context Regional vision Regional Cooperation Spatial context and hierarchy
Location of commercial and social infrastructure to create sustainable centres Local spatial context Employment
Regional context Current local economic context Future local economic and employment context Planning for economic growth Activity Centres Economic stimulation
Transport and Communication Regional context Neighbouring towns’ road and rail infrastructure \ Telecommunications infrastructure Port access Water infrastructure
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY Regional Context Landscape Biodiversity Water Surface and Groundwater supplies Wetlands and Waterways Physical and Topographical Features Climate Change
ORGANISATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY Effective delivery of local government services
Average residential rates per assessment Average rate increases Financial ratios Grants Measurement of performance Special circumstances
Matters affecting the viability of a local government Ability to attract and retain employees Additional revenue generating practices Best practice rate setting
$0$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800
30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 55000 60000
Population Growth
Inc
om
e in
$M
Average
Mandurah
Financial Capacity – Funding Gap
• Second Place in 2011 International Liveable Communities Awards for the Shire’s Plan for the Future
• Category 1 rating and Best Practice Commendation for Strategic & Community Planning by Department of Local Government in 2010
• Committed Councillors
• Highly capable staff
• Working to deliver
Municipality Population Representation Optimum Size
City of Auckland 1,460,000 1 mayor, 20 members of the governing body and 148 members of 21 local boards.
69,523
Vancouver 650,000 night 1,000,000 day
1 Mayor 10 councillors. 23 defined neighbourhoods.
28,260 - 43,478
Wiltshire Council 452,000 98 councillors with 10 councillor Cabinet as decision makers. 18 community area boards.
25,111
Swindon Borough Council
200,000 10 person Cabinet with 59 councillors. Seven geographic clusters.
28,571
Perth 2031 2,200,000 30 local governments 73,333 Perth 2056 3,500,000 30 local governments 116,666 1968 Local Government Assessment Committee
Optimum operation 75,000 to 125,000 Urban councils should have a minimum of 65,000 Developing urban councils should have a minimum of 40,000
1972 Local Government Boundaries Commission
Commission did not think municipalities should be too large Populations over 40,000 should be aimed at. Fringe municipalities such as Cockburn and Wanneroo would bear the brunt of expansion growth so no radical changes were required.
Serpentine Jarrahdale
Current 19,825 2024 population of 40,561 2031 population of 51,094
Precautionary Principle
Objective is more effective local government, Potential benefits are reduced or lost when the process is flawed There is little evidence that amalgamation will automatically yield substantial economies of scale
Various forms of consolidation have the capacity to yield economies of scope.
Efficiency gains can be achieved but are unlikely to produce reductions in local rates and charges Consolidation offers opportunities to achieve economies of scope or enhanced strategic capacity. This effect may well be the strongest in the case of amalgamation into relatively large units.
Too much attention is focused on the institutional arrangements rather than on the fundamental issue of the societal functions performed by local government and its changing role.
Precautionary Principle There are many disbenefits to consolidation – disruption, transition costs, weakening of local democracy, loss of local identity and employment – that need to weighed in any strategic approach to reform
One size does not fit all, form must follow function and objectives must be clear.
Consolidation almost always works best after extensive consultation with, and wherever possible with the imprimatur of, the local community.
In most cases the costs of change and dislocation were underestimated and too rarely factored into the cost-benefit equation. The “do nothing” costs also need to be carefully and openly examined.
Moves to consolidation should not be rushed. Time is needed to consult widely and properly consider all options and their implications. Appropriate expertise needs to be engaged. The additional expenditure and extended timeframe involved are likely to prove less costly than having to repair (or unwind) sub-optimal solutions.
Options
“State parliament and its attendant departments and agencies operate defacto as Perth’s metropolitan local government through the WA Planning Commission as
its principal agency.”
“Have taken over functions which in other states or countries fall within the province of local government”
“A metropolitan government would be an appropriate
model for resolving these deficiencies.”
Options Divide local governments into units between 25,000 to 100,000 dependent on an assessment of the social, economic and environmental cost-benefit (including transition costs) and an assessment of their organisational sustainability Define optimum economies of scale for State, Metropolitan and Local services both current and future. State – Only where optimum threshold is greater than Perth Metropolitan area; rail, hospitals Metro – COAG agenda, National Urban Policy, schools, police, fire and rescue, water, roads, waste management, natural resource management, climate change, housing, metropolitan and regional planning Local - town planning, building services, volunteer fire brigades, community services, cultural activities and events