naam tilburg institute for law, technology, and society email
DESCRIPTION
Naam Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society email. Ambient Intelligence: Challenges for Regulatory Perspectives. Prof. Corien Prins Center for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT) www.uvt.nl/tilt Tilburg University Enschede, 27 November 2007. What Challenges do we face?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
NaamTilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society
November 2007 2
Ambient Intelligence: Challenges for Regulatory Perspectives
Prof. Corien Prins
Center for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT)
www.uvt.nl/tilt
Tilburg University
Enschede, 27 November 2007
November 2007 3
What Challenges do we face?
• Privacy protection: what data do I ‘transmit’, who receives these data, who uses them and for what purposes?
• Identity and dimensions of identity: ambient intelligence results in categories, (stereo) types of people
• Autonomy and freedom: can we still say “NO” (isn’t it all in the public interest?)
• Ownership: who owns all this data?
• Our world and our intelligent surroundings as one big database.
November 2007 4
From Psysical Products to Immaterial Data
• Ambient intelligence– it is all about personal data, information and
knowledge
• Personal data, information and knowledge– it is all about power and money
• Power and Money– in the end our challenge is balancing interests
• Balancing interests– What instruments can best be used?
November 2007 5
However:
• Various developments testify to the growing influence of property thinking in the human rights domain:
– property in personality (name, appearance, voice, etc.);– property in human body parts– Property in personal data.
• Data about individuals nowadays have become a key commercial asset (e.g. data in biobanks; Google/YouTube
• Developments in intellectual property
• Extend property interests to personal data of individuals (why not grant individuals same rights in their name as companies/why not recognise the property right of companies);
• Individuals must be able to negotiate and bargain over the use of their data and they need something in return (return benefits)
November 2007 6
However:
• Property rights perspective does not fit the human rights perspective (human right is a right of non-interference, not a right of positive entitlement);
• More than just a commodity (dignity, social value of privacy): ambient intelligence also requires us to think about autonomy.
• Privacy is linked to constituting and maintaining a person’s personal integrity. Thus, it is a non-commodifiable right
• Ambient intelligence is often also about groups of people, not just individual data.
November 2007 7
Personal Data? Or is it all about Identities?
• Individual data versus combined data (linking databases);
• Data are not just data (not one uniform category)
• Ambient intelligence; RFID, personalized services require use to focus not so much on the individual data, but on the effects of the use of present-day technologies and the use of combined data;
• Thus: focus on identities (types of persons; types of citizens/types of consumers/types of healthy/unhealthy people, type of ethnic origin, etc.).
November 2007 8
Shifting in Our Attention
• Shift our attention from individual sets of personal data toward the statistical models, profiles and the algorithms with which individuals are assigned to a certain group or ‘identity’;
• Data protection mechanisms must be structured along lines of control and visibility.
• Data protection mechanisms must be structured along lines of transparency and trust
• … and maybe other benefits??
November 2007 9
Ambient Intelligence: What We Need
• We need to know and understand how social and economic identities are constructed, influenced and used;
• We need instruments to know and to control how our ‘lives’ are ‘created’ and influenced;
• We need other ‘personal data’ protection standards
• Our identity is more that an administrative identity (ipse identity – idem identity)
• We do need instruments to protect our autonomy and individual identity.