n8 9 - 16 75 3 t - nasa€¦ · n8 9 - 16 75 3.,!,t von karman institute for fluiddynamics lecture...
TRANSCRIPT
N8 9 - 16 75 3. ,! ,t
VON KARMAN INSTITUTE FOR FLUID DYNAMICS
LECTURE SERIES 1988-04
INTAKEAERODYNAMICS
FEBRUARY22- 26,1988
CFD APPLICATION TO SUBSONIC INLET AIRFRAME INTEGRATION
Bernhard H. Anderson
NASA-Lewis Research Center, Ohio, USA
1989007377-179
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19890007382 2020-06-19T19:48:17+00:00Z
. CIRCULAR90 DEGREEINPLANEBEND :R/r = 3.2, TurbulentFlow,Roy= 40,000
StreomwiseVelocity '_: Experiment I'_
,4" Anolysis ( PNS Solution I-Meoh = 50x50x86 _ J (X
-Mesh= 25x25x86 ! "_ " I 'k_
- ! i!i "i
• Flow
Surface Sheor Stress
1989007377-187
,, CIRCULAR180 DEGREEINPLANEBEND ':R/r - 7, LominarFlow,Rey- 242
PNSSolution,SecondoryFlowTheta- 50.0 degrees
[;-;-;....-,...:_1_i'
l_'
_ Analysis Experiment'
CIRCULAR180 DECREEINPLANEBENDR/r = 7, LominarFlow,Rey- 242
PN$Solution,SecondoryFlow ,:,.
i Theto- 75.0 degrees
!_ _.......-s--:,
Z.:.... :.L._--""- - - 'ORIGINALPAGEISOF POORQUALITY
Analysis Experiment (_
1989007377-191
CIRCULAR180 DEGREEiNPLANEBEND• R/r -- 7, LaminarFlow,Rey= 242• PNSSolution,SecondaryFlow
' Theta= 105.0degrees
:., _'_
_ .[2 .........
Li-_--
_ ' AnaJysis Experimento.
iCIRCULAR180 DEGREE:INPLANE.BENDR/r = 7, LominorFlow,Rey- 242 .........
PNSSolution,Seconda:,ryFlow
Theta= 1,35.0degrees ._.-!
:i_: .....
Analysis ' Experiment
1989007377-192
ORIGINALP,EC,E iS ,45OF POOR QUALITY
CIRCULAR22.5- 22.5 DEGREEINPLANES-BEND iLorninorFlow,Rey= 790
- StreQmwiseVelocity
ExperimentAnoiysis( PNSSolution)' Mesh = 40x40x80
..... Mesh = 20 x 20 x 80-
1,
\
\
%
@ ',Row ' "" +
. ('
!t
:CIRCULAR22:5- 22.5 DEGREEINPLANES-BEND ',LominorFlow,Rey = 790 \
SecondaryVelocity
• -------- 1989007377-194
" CIRCULAR22.5- 22.5 DEGREEINPLANES-BENDTurbulentFlow,Rey=-48,000
- _ StreamwiseVelocity
• Experiment'm . : Analysis( PNSSolution)
.- o Mesh= 50x 50x 80- , ..... Mesh= 25x25x80,e
•" IDI
.
I I'!
" " ' 1989007377-195
,,' CIRCULAR45- 45 DEGREEINPLANES-BEND 'PNSSolution,SurfaceSkinFriction
' TurbulentFlow,.Rey= 5.0x 105
i
,.. _ o Experi.mentCF - Analysisi
., I I ,,, I , I , I
. ' S- Length
CF . r,,- 'o _o o -oI
, I I ,, I . I., I I .l
N- Length E- Length.i I; t
I
CIRCULAR45- 45 DEGREEINPLANES-BEND tPNSSolution,CompressorFaceStation
TurbulentFlow,Rey= 5.0x 105, Mesh= 50 X50X100= 2.5x 105i
f
"i Experiment 'Analysis
II.. _"..7._lt(4:!.JJ.A_Jl ,..,,jL,,_ :i
'TotalPressureLoss SecondaryVelocity
• . 1989007377_19_8
•i _,. |
UNIVERSITYOFTENNESSEEINLETDUCTCirculor30-,30 degreeInp!oneS-Bend i_ . TotolPressureContours
• Aexit/Ainlet= 1.0
Experiment .Anolysis Experiment .Anolysis ,_,Theta= 45.0 degrees Theto= 60.Coegrees
UNIVERSITYOFTENNESSEEINLETDUCT..Circulor,30-,30degreeInplaneS-Bend i:
TotalPressureContoursAexit/Ainlet= 1.0 _'
_ .
Experiment Analysis Experiment AnalysisTheta= I,.5.0degrees Theto= 32.0 degrees "_
1989007377-201
........................................................................................................1989007377-202
x: t_<!
" RAE2129AIRCRAFTINTAKEDUCT .'_
,CompressorFaceTotal Pressure6 6 '_ Offset/Length= 0.50, M- 0.608,Re- . 1x 10
.i
i _'L_---_-.-,_ 11117
'.r
Analysis( No Hub) Experiment '_
tRAE2129AIRCRAFTINTAKE.DUCT i
,CompressorFaceTotal PressureOffset/Length= 0.50, M- 0.412,Re- 4.1,.5x 106 _
-i -
,Analysis( No Hub) Experiment I_
1989007377-205
2,]I _i,_,_
RAE2129AIRCRAFTINTAKEDUCT.CompressorFoceTotol Pressure
Offset/Length= 0.,t0, M= 0.794,Re= 6.60x 106
i '
.2 AnGlysis(No Hub) ExperimentJ
\RAE2129AIRCRAFTINTAKEDUCT
.CompressorFoceTotal PressuOffset/Length= 0.45, M= 0.,.t85,Re- 5e90x 106
Anolysis( No Hub) Experiment :_
1989007377-206
RAE2129AIRCRAFTINTAKEDUCTCompressorFaceTotal Pressure
_' Offset/Length= 0.45, M= 0.77,3,Re- 6.50x 106It
t
r
J
i
!4
Analysis( No Hub) Experimenti
\
RAE2129AIRCRAFTINTAKEDUCT• ,CompressorFaceToto Pressure
Offset/Length= 0.45, M= 0.57,_t,Re- 5.,37x 106
!
Analysis( No Hub) Experiment
1989007377-207
' ORIGINALPAG
,, OF POORQUALITY 't4't
UNIVERSITYOFTENNESSEEINLETDUCT iCirclJlar50-50 degree Inplane ,._-Bend
Total Pressure Contours, No Vortex Generators•. X/D- .29
1
Analysis Experimen[
i\
UNIVERSITYOF-TENN.%{_-.....oE.EINII-r i)u_:iCircular 50-50 degree Inp,r;rleS.....E!cr_d i
-I-oralPressure Contours, No Vorte.x C.er!crut(,rs tX/'D- 2.4.9
I-I
Analysis t::,:p_,:ironenI
1989007377-213
ORIGINALPAGE IS _,
' OF POOR QUALITY: UNIVERSITYOFTENNESSEEINI_.I:.II[DII]CI "q/
, Circular 50-,]0 degree Inplan_._S-B,?t;d' Total Pressure Contours, No Vc:,rtr;xOertorator:s
X/D=s.7o
Analysis Experiment
IJNIVERSITYOF]ENNE""......'.... r:i:),:)E.LI.. r'i[i.... [')j r
C;rcular 50-50 degree npl,a_,.::,':i---[.i,:r_,i iTara! Pres{" e.oLir Contc)urs,No:)Vort,,x Cr_,rl,,r_:!_.,r{"
', . . ' L.... ) t
X/D - _-)r',_,
1
t
Analysis '
1989007377-214
?
_ -D
,- ORIGINALPAGE IS_,_ ._._o OF POOR QUALITY
- _ _
vo Q..)
_0
°_ LLICD I0_" I I I'
_"_ X 0
•,_E _,
,,, _.
o
la
•1_ iIJ_. U'3 _3t.,t_/
• _' f'Y" 0"_ IJ_l _J_ ,,4 _
• • _7,10 _.H
O=la
0'_
"* _ 0• ,_4_j¢ ,_
1
®
l .....................................................................1989007377-217
_, ORIGINALPA_E 13' OF POOR QUALITY ,
" UNIVERSITYOFTENNESSEEINL.ETDUCT, Circular,30--50degreeInplaneS--Bend ii_, Total PressureContours,VortexCeneratorr:_
X/r") .,, _.: -!29
I
!
i," Analysis Experiment
It:9
\
UNIVERSITYOFTENNESSEEINI....E....DUC.[Circular,30-50 degreetripan,!-'.S--Ei,:_r-_d
Taro Pressun-_,.Contours,Vortex(..terlera!:orsX//D- 2.49
2
L
;' jt
A a y_l,:, Exp_:rlment_. nl _,'_.... •
1989007377-219
ORZGfr_ALp_ ISOF POOR QUALITY' i_ ,-'!
UNIVERSITYOFTENNESSEEINLETDU(:TCircular50-30 degreeInplaneS....Bend
Total PressureContours,VortexOenera!orsI1 r) ] "7, X/L 370
Ariaysis [!xperimfmt
1989007377-220
,!
_, F20COMPUTATIONALSTUDYINLETGeometryDefinition,DownstreomView
i In-PloneOffset,Offset/Lenqth- 0.2_ Aexit/Ainlet= 1.42_
F
I
\
F30COMPUTATIONALSTUDYINLETGeometryDefinition,DownstreomView
' StroiahtCenterlineInletDuct,, Aexit/Ainlet= 1.42L-
1989007377-224
II! /,
, 1
CFDVALIDATIONEXPERIMENTModels A CircularArc (R/r = 5.6) RoundDiffuserof Are(] Ratio
1.5 will be Arrangedin the Formof two Connecting90.0 DegreeBen[Isso as to Allowo 180 deqreeInplone,90-90 out-of-plane, and 90-90 InploneDiffusingDuct
Conditions For EachDuct,ThreeSets of SeparatedFlowData willbe Obtained;for LaminarFlowat NominalReynoldsNumberof 500 and 1093, and TurbulentFlowat oReynoldsNumberof 43,000
Analysis A Pre-Test Anoly.siswill be Performedto Establishthe_FlowSeparationTopologiesand howthey are EffectedbyReynoldsNumber,BoundaryLayerThickness,and Swirl
Meosurments Experimentswill be Carriedout with CombinationsofLaser-Velocimetry,Hot WireAnenometr!/,PressureTubes,endRow Visualization.SurveyPlaneswillbeEstablishedfromAnalysisoftheComputationalResults
I!
CFDVALIDATIONEXPERIMENT tTitle ConfinedSeparationin CurvedDiffusingDucts '
Ii
Objective Establisha DetailedExperimentalDot(]Bosefor #Evaluationof NovierStokesCodesfor ConfinedSeparatedFlowsin CurvedDiffusingDucts
Thrusts Extensionand Vclidotionof LewisPNSSolverintoSeparatedFlowRegimeusing FlareApproximationsEvaluationand Extensionof State-of-the-Art -,
Tu-Modelsfor Confined,Separated,SwirlingFlows jEvaluationand Validationof LewisTimeMarching tNS Solver(PROTEUS)into SeparatedFlowRegime
Approach A Joint Analysis/ExperimentalProqromwill be - iInitiatedin whichthe ExperimentalMeasurmentswillbe Performedat a University,and the Analysis
I at LewisResearchCenter "
b ®ti ! i
1989007377-227
4 I
CONFINEDSEPARATIONINCURVEDDIFFUSINGDUCTS ,,, CFDValidotionCoses
ReynoldsNo. Swirl iFlow 6/R Conf.1 Conf.2 Conf.3Angle
500.0 Laminar 0.2 0.0 CS CS CS30.0 CS CS CS
I 45.0 CS CS CS
1.0 0.0 CS CS SF45.0 CS CS CS
1093.0 Lominor 0.2 0.0 CS CS SF30.0 CS CS SF
t 45.0 CS CS CSi" 1.0 0.0 CS SF SF"' 45.0 CS SF SF
f 43,000 Turbulent 0.2 0.0 CS CS SF
15.0 CS CS CS30.0 CS CS CS
1.0 0.0 CS SF** SF**30.0 CS CS CSL.i AF- AttochedFlow CS- ConfinedSeporotion SF- SeporotedFlowIt
# #
I CFDVALIDATIONDIFFUSINGDUCTS \180 DegreeInploneGeometry
ConfigurotionNo. 1
t
N
1989007377-228
CFDVALIDATIONDIFFUSINGDUCTS _,_ 90/90 Out-of-Plone Geometry _
ConfigurotionNo. 2
N
CFDVALIDATIONDIFFUSINGDUCTS \90/'90DeqreeInploneGeometry
ConfigurotionNo. 5 i
1989007377-229