myghg mitigation reporting template ver. 03 march · pdf filemyghg mitigation reporting...
TRANSCRIPT
MYGHG Mitigation Reporting Template Ver. 03 March 2015
(This GHG mitigation reporting template is to be cross-referred with the latest Measurement and Reporting (MR) Guidance document for full description of the required information) A. Policy level GHG Mitigation-MR SUMMARY
A.1 Summary
Title: (Name of the national mitigation strategy)
Sustainability Achieved via Energy Efficiency (SAVE) Rebate Programme for Chiller
Level of assessment
Programme level
Main policy or actions in assessment
NKEA ETP EPP9 – Oil Gas & Energy
Type of Policy/Action
Subsidies and incentives
Status of the strategy
Implemented
Date of implementation (the date the mitigation strategy comes into effect)
7 July, 2011
Date of Completion (if applicable)
31 December, 2016
Description of specific intervention(s)
Click here to enter text.
Other related policy/actions (Other policy that may interact with the abovementioned main policy)
Minimum Energy Performance Standard (MEPS)
Targeted sector(s) (single or multiple choices, if applicable)
☐Energy ☐Forestry
☐Industrial Processes and Product Use ☐Agriculture
☒Buildings ☐Waste
☐Transport ☐Other (Click here to enter text.)
Category of mitigation action MRV
Domestic
Geographical Coverage
National
Estimated GHG Emission Reductions
Click here to enter text. (MtCO2 / year)
Brief description of GHG mitigation programme and the proposed activities
The SAVE Programme was targeted at stimulating sales of energy efficient chillers by providing rebates to qualified business owner to replace existing chillers installed before on or in 2002
(Provide brief account of target policy, measures, relevant Ministries & Government Departments, MRV activities (project features – technology, capacity building measures- workshops, financing – model etc.,)
with new energy efficient chillers with a rebate amount of RM200 per Refrigeration Ton. The increase in efficiency of the chillers is to be measured as kW/RT and must meet the Malaysian Standard MS 1525:2007 (Code of Practice on Energy Efficiency and use of Renewable Energy for Non-Residential Buildings). GHG reduction is expected to come from: i) More energy efficient chillers complying to kW/RT ii) Refrigerants that have similar or lower GWPs compared to the replaced chiller, excluding the banned refrigerants.
B. MRV PROPONENT(S)
B.1 Information of MRV Proponents (Provide details of each MRV proponent separately by copying this Section B.)
MRV’s Coordinating and Managing Entity
SEDA Malaysia
Major Responsibilities
Energy Efficiency project - Managing and implementing projects
mandated to SEDA
Domain activities, skills and expertise (e.g. major activity / business of agency / institution/organisation, and current skills and experience with specific reference to the proposed MRV, motivation / rationale for leading the MRV )
SEDA is responsible for processing applications for the SAVE programme, appoint authorized verifiers, the distribution of rebate and random monitoring of the recipients of the rebate and provide human capital development (training).
Contact person
Steve Lojutin
Details of contact Tel: 03-8870 5841 Fax: 03-8870 5900 Email: [email protected] / [email protected]
B.2 MRV Collaborator(s) (Provide details of the agencies / institutions collaborating with MRV proponent(s) in MRV design, development, implementation and financing (domestic institutions or international Donor) Provider of energy efficient chillers: Participating manufacturers Verifying of energy efficient chillers: Appointed by KETTHA/SEDA, and assisted by SIRIM QAS, MASHRAE, ACEM and IEM (Technical Committee SAVE Chiller) Awareness and promotion: Coordinated and implemented by KeTTHA/SEDA and assisted by MASHRAE and manufacturers.
Refer to Table 1 in Annex IV for list of Chiller’s verifier.
Collaborator 1
Name of the Collaborator
Contact person
Click here to enter text.
Details of contact Tel: Fax: Email:
Responsibilities
Click here to enter text.
(Repeat this section for 2nd and each subsequent collaborator )
C. MRV DESCRIPTION
C.1 Policies and Regulations (Provide an overview of the prevailing policies and regulations in the sector chosen for the MRV)
C.1.1 Federal / State Policies
Name of the Policy & Year of introduction
Click here to enter text.
Implementing department / agency
Click here to enter text.
Policy brief
Click here to enter text.
Current level of acceptance or compliance
Click here to enter text.
Indicate source (web link) of policy document
Click here to enter text.
C.1.2 Federal / State Regulations
Name of the Regulation & Year of introduction
Click here to enter text.
Implementing department / agency
Click here to enter text.
Regulation brief Click here to enter text.
Current level of acceptance or compliance
Click here to enter text.
Indicate source (web link) of Regulation document
Click here to enter text.
C.2 Current level of activities (Baseline) (Provide all relevant information and details of the on-going activities for establishing a credible baseline) Baseline data was provided by SEDA based on market share of RT (refrigerant tone).
C.2.1 Details of Sub-Sector assessed ( i.e. which contributes to GHG emissions and removals)
ENERGY
a) Fuel Combustion Activities: Energy
Industries b) Fugitive Emissions from Fuels: Choose
an item.
c) Carbon dioxide transport and storage: Choose an item.
INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES AND PRODUCT USE
a) Mineral Industry: Choose an item. b) Chemical Industry: Choose an item.
c) Metal Industry: Choose an item.
d) Non-energy products from fuels and solvents use: Choose an item.
e) Electronics Industry: Choose an item.
f) Product uses as substitutes for ozone depleting substances: Refrigeration and air conditioning
g) Other product manufacture and use: Choose an item.
h) Other: Choose an item.
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND OTHER LAND USE
a) Livestock: Choose an item. b) Land: Choose an item.
c) Aggregated Sources and Non-CO2 emissions sources on Land: Choose an item.
d) Other: Choose an item.
WASTE
☐Solid waste disposal ☐Biological treatment of solid waste
☐Incineration and open burning of waste ☐Wastewater treatment and discharge
☐Other (Pls specify)
OTHER
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
2011 2012 2013
RT
Year
RT Actual vs Target
Actual Target
☐Indirect N2O emissions from the atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in NOx and NH3
C.2.2 GHG Assessment (Provide the geographical coverage of MRV)
National
(Provide GHG assessment period)
YYYY to YYYY
C.2.3 GHG Emissions & Sources (Identify the major sources of GHG emissions/sink and the GHG targeted to be included in the MRV)
a) Source category, GHG targeted
☒Stationary fossil fuel combustion, CO2,CH4, N2O
☐Mobile fossil fuel combustion, CO2,CH4, N2O
☐Cement manufacture, CO2 ☐Aluminium production, CO2, PFCs
☐Natural gas system, CO2,CH4 ☐Landfills, CH4
☐Electrical transmission and distribution, SF6 ☐Refrigeration and air conditioning equipment, HFCs
☐Agricultural soil management, CO2, N2O ☐Forest and other land use, CO2,CH4, N2O
b) Sink category, GHG targeted
☐Biological processes, CO2 ☐Carbon capture and storage, CO2
Target Beneficiaries
List the target beneficiaries e.g. manufacturers, consumers – domestic or industrial or commercial, project developers Chiller manufacturer. Owners of buildings that utilise chillers for comfort cooling.
Provide quantitative assessment of the size of the beneficiaries under the MRV There are 180 chillers in Malaysia, estimated based on 2013 Annual Report of SEDA where 89,454 chillers represent about 46% of the chillers in the market.
Inclusion Criteria
List the criteria likely to be followed for including any beneficiary situated in the MRV boundary to join NAMA e.g. size of the activity (MWe o MWth), current efficiency levels, technology etc., Chillers for comfort cooling or commercial building at operation or non-operational condition installed before or in the year 2002 for Peninsular Malaysia. Chillers for cooling or chilling for process activities and buildings installed before or in the year 2002 in East Malaysia (more than 10 years).
Only water-cooled electric chillers are can apply for rebates. Replacement chillers must comply with the minimum kW/RT rating stipulated in MS1525:2007.
C.3 Baseline activity and emissions
Provide a brief of business as usual scenario of the sector / sub-sector and latest emissions data set with sources Historical data not available.
Emissions Data Set
Provide the latest emissions data set for the sector / sub-sector and cite sources. Indicate any limitation on the extent of availability of data
GHG Emission factor for electricity generation: 0.792 kg CO2e/KWh (MYLCID) Emission data of refrigerants in terms of % of initial charge/year (IPCC)
GWP of refrigerants (IPCC)
Emissions Archive (Historical)
Provide details of the past emissions and trend for the sector / sub-sector under the MRV
Chillers have cross-sector applications. The SAVE Programme for chillers however targets at chillers that are part of the HVAC system, and of capacity relevant to the non-residential buildings. In principle, emissions prior to introducing the SAVE programme would have been 66,607 ton CO2, avoided through replacement with energy efficient chillers since July 2011 to Dec 2013.
Agents and projections
Provide a brief analysis of the agents that are influencing the emission developments
Other than Environmental Quality (Refrigerant Management) Regulations 1999 that bans all CFCs, the use of all other refrigerants are not regulated, including those with high GWPs. Energy efficient chillers meeting the MS1525 standard may be using refrigerants of higher GWP as compared to the older chiller being replaced. Hence it is important that considerations should also be given to refrigerants used for programmes that are targeting at GHG emission reductions from chillers. References of 100-year time horizon GWP (Global Warming Potential): Table 2.14 of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Fourth Assessment Report, 2007.
BAU scenario
List the major assumptions and the future outlook (projections) of GHG emission levels / development pattern in the sector / sub-sector under the MRV in the BAU scenario Continued use of low energy efficiency chillers with possible leakage of refrigerants of high GWP during operation in HVAC systems of commercial buildings, and also industrial processes in East Malaysia. The higher consumption of electricity means higher GHG emission from the power plants
Provide an outline of influence of any Federal or Provincial policy or regulations on the above emission projections Chillers are not included in the Minimum Energy Performance (MEP) equipment list regulated by Energy Commission.
C.4 Barriers
Provide a brief description of the barriers faced by the sector / sub-sector to achieve any or additional GHG emission reductions in the absence of policy instruments;
Barriers
Provide a brief summary of the barriers faced by the sector / sub-sector for achieving GHG emission reductions. Typical barriers relate to technology, investment, economic viability, lack of knowledge / skills/ training / experience, regulatory, historical failures. The guidance for various barriers can be referred from CDM (http://cdm.unfccc.int/)
Describe how the proposed activities under the mitigation action will overcome the barriers for the sector / sub-sector.
C.5 Proposed activities
List the activities and expected outcomes with a tentative time-schedule under the mitigation actions.
Proposed Activities
Boundary and Expected Outcomes
Implementation Schedule
SAVE Program: Rebate chiller (RM200/tone) for retrofit inefficient chillers for comfort cooling.
Date of Start 2011
Date of Completion 2013
(a) Submit information on existing chillers for verification and approval of SEDA
Old chillers that will be replaced
(b) Purchase and install new chillers within 6 months of approval from SEDA and get ready information for site verfication
Old chillers replaced, with potential release of refrigerants during recovery and disposal phase New chillers installed with reduced energy consumption and reduced GHG emission
(c) Monitor performance and GHG reduction of new chillers over stipulated period
GHG reduction measured based on site-measurements of electricity consumed during operation of new chillers
(Add rows as required)
C.6 Estimation of annual GHG emission reductions
Provide an approximate estimate of annual GHG emission reductions anticipated to be achieved from all the proposed activities on a cumulative basis.
The estimation methodology will be adapted from CDM EB56 III.X Energy Efficiency and HFC-134a Recovery in Residential Refrigerators, and EB34 Paragraph 17 Type of GHGs to be Considered in Accounting for Project and Leakage Emissions. Emission reductions are based on:
Electricity consumed (ex-ante) to operate the new chiller for the one year
% of total refrigerant from the new chiller that would be released over one year after replacement
Annual GHG emission reductions
Year Emission reductions (tCO2e) – Based on Energy Efficiency
2011 49964.6
2012 81190.6
2013 113667
Total 244822
Refer to Table 1 in Annex II.
C.7 Overall benefits
Describe the overall expected benefits (both quantitative and qualitative) for the stakeholders from the implementation of the proposed activities under the MRV in the targeted sector / sub-sector. The SAVE Programme for chillers is one of the initiatives to mitigate GHG emissions reduction.
Save energy costs of the chiller owner from reduced energy consumption
Environmental
Reduction in GHG emissions, use of low GWP refrigerants.
Economic (optional)
Cost reduction in term of electricity bill
Societal (optional)
Cooler environment
Others (optional)
List other major benefits proposed to be achieved in the mitigation action
(e.g. technology, transfer of IPR, skills, replication potential to scale the GHG mitigation, uptake potential of the national policy / regulation on low carbon due to mitigation action etc.,)
C.8 Measuring, Reporting & Verification
Provide a brief summary of MRV concept and approach for the proposed activities under the mitigation actions/strategies. (Create hyperlink to the completed MR plan excel sheet) The monitoring activities address both the energy efficiency aspect of the newly chiller and the refrigerant contribution to GHG reduction.
Measuring
Provide a description of the monitoring methodology and list key monitoring parameters as applicable for the Sector and its applicability for the sub-sector The SAVE Programme require the applicant to install a permanent sub-metering (power meter) to measure and monitor the kW/RT of the new chiller(s).
Provide a brief summary of monitoring infrastructure and competency available / proposed to be deployed
Data recorder is installed together with the sub-metering (power meter) or applicant is expected to keep a log book of the readings from the power meter at frequencies stipulated in the official approval letter from SEDA.
Reporting
Provide a brief summary of modus operandi on reporting along with the roles and responsibilities of the team
Random reporting as required by SEDA Malaysia in the official approval letter
Verification (optional)
Summarise the proposed type of verification, approach, frequency, standards and engagement of third party including whether it is mandated by donor or as per host country requirements N/A
Indicate the extent of anticipated overlapping with other programme like CDM, voluntary projects and also procedures to avoid double counting of GHG emission reductions
D. OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION AND ANNEX
D.1 Other information
Provide details of any other information relevant to the mitigation action implementation
Implementation Guidelines Version 3
Sustainability Achieved Via Energy Efficiency (SAVE) Rebate Program for Chiller. KeTTHA and SEDA
D.2 Annex information
List the title of the Annex here
Annex I
Tables
Tabulation for identification of Sources and Sinks
Annex II
Figure 1 Identification of sources of GHG
emission from mapping the input, activities, intermediate effects and the corresponding GHG effects in the SAVE Rebate Programme for Chiller
Annex III
Table 1 Calculation of Baseline and Potential
GHG Emission Reduction by Energy Efficiency
Annex IV
Table 1 List of Chiller Verifiers
Annex V List of Global Warming Potentials (GWP) relative to CO2
Annex I
Tabulation for identification of Sources and Sinks
Summary of inputs, activities and effects
Inputs Financing, old chillers, new chillers that are energy efficient, associated equipment with the chiller, authorised verifier, testing facilities, site measurement equipment (sub-metering or power meter)
Activities Procurement of energy efficient chillers and associated equipment, Site verification, provision of rebates, monitoring, measurement and monitor the indicator (kW/RT) using power meters, disposal of old chillers
Intermediate effects
Stimulate purchase of energy efficient chillers, stimulate production of refrigerants with lower GWP, stimulate production of associated equipment such as pumps, cooling towers, valves that will enhance the performance of the chillers, old chillers and associated equipment contribute to recycling industry as feedstock, reduce in electricity consumption, reduce production, leakage and disposal of high GWP refrigerants
GHG effects Reduce CO2, CH4 and N2O from reduced electricity consumption, reduced refrigerant with high GWO, leading to reduced CO2eq emission from possible fugitive emission of refrigerants with lower GWP
Non-ghg effects
Enhance resource recovery industry with availability of old chillers parts made of copper and iron.
Identification of Intermediate Effects
Intended effect Electricity consumption by chillers is reduced Consumption of high GWP refrigerants is reduced
Unintended effect
Availability of chillers that are energy efficient based on the indicator (kW/RT) but uses high GWP refrigerants with potential leakage and fugitive emission, resulting in higher GHG emission from the equivalent ghg of the replaced old chillers
In-jurisdiction effect
Local chiller manufacturers produce energy efficient chillers, importers will bring in energy efficient chillers Availability of replaced chillers as feedstock for recycling industry such as copper parts, and iron parts for the steel-making industry
Out-of-jurisdiction effect
Functional old chillers that are replaced may be sold in other ASEAN markets as recond-chillers, thus increasing ghg emissions in other countries
Technology effect
Technological development to increase kW/RT
Identify sources/ sink categories and ghg associated with the ghg effects - GHG assessment
boundary
Potential GHG effects
Source/sink categories
GHG targeted
GHG effect
Justification
Emissions from electricity generation
Stationary fossil combustion in grid-connected power
plants
CO2, CH4, N2O
Reduced emission
Significant from purchasing more energy
efficient chillers
Emission from leakage of
refrigerants during deinstallation and disposal/recovery
Release of refrigerants
CFCs Increase emission
Leakage may not have happened if no
replacement was done
Emission from recovery/ disposal
of refrigerant
Release of refrigerants
CFCs Increase emission
Release may not have happened if no
replacement was done
Figure 1 : Identification of sources of GHG emission from mapping the input, activities, intermediate
effects and the corresponding GHG effects in the SAVE Rebate Programme for Chiller.
Annex II
Table 1: Calculation of Baseline and Potential GHG Emission Reduction by Energy Efficiency
Item Old Chiller New Chiller
Type of chiller Water-cooled centrifugal chillers Water-cooled centrifugal chillers
Brands Mitsubishi York Trane
Cooling capacity 1000 tone 1000 tone
Power capacity 680 kW 592 kW
Efficiency level 0.68 kW/RT 0.59 kW/RT
Daily energy usage (Operation period = 24 hr./daily)
Estimated energy usage
annually
24 hr. x 0.68 kW/tone x 1000 tone x
364 days = 5,940,480 kWh
24 hr. x 0.59 kW/tone x 1000 tone
x 364 days = 5,154,240 kWh
GHG emission/ year 5,940,480 kWh x 0.792 kg CO2e/kWh
= 4,704,860 kgCO2e
5,154,240 kWh x 0.792 kg
CO2eq/kWh = 4,082,158 kgCO2e
GHG emission reduction
through energy efficiency
622,702 kgCO2e/year
623 toneCO2e/year
Table 2: Example Calculation of Baseline and Potential GHG Emission Reduction via Refrigerant of Lower
GWP Based on Type of Refrigerant.
Item Old Chiller New Chiller
Type of chiller Water-cooled centrifugal chillers Water-cooled centrifugal chillers
Brands Mitsubishi York Trane
Cooling capacity 1000 tone 1000 tone
Power capacity 680 kW 592 kW
Refrigerant R-11 R-123
Amount charge at
installation
Leakage at dis-installation
*Leakage during operation % of lose refrigerant = 8.5%/year
Leaking = 8.5/100 x 1000 tone
= 85 tone R-11/year
% of lose refrigerant = 0.1%/year
Leaking = 0.1/100 x 1000 tone
= 0.1 tone R-
123/year
Leakage at recovery (for
disposal)
**GWP *4,750 *77
GHG emission/year 85 tone R-11 x 4750 GWP
= 403750 toneCO2e/year
0.1 tone R-123 x 77 GWP
= 7.7 toneCO2e/year
GHG emission reduction
through energy efficiency
403742.3 toneCO2e/year
Note * - Older chillers can lose refrigerant at 2-15 percent annually. Newer chillers equipped with
specially design pressure vessels and high-performance seals can cut the loss rate to 0.1 percent per
year. Chillers Performance: (Source: http://www.facilitiesnet.com. Challenge and Solutions – Facility
Management Energy Efficiency Feature )
Note ** - GWP for 100-year time horizon. 4th assessment report (AR4).
Annex IV
Table 1: List of Chiller Verifiers
1st Verifiers Name
1 IR LEONG SAIK KONG (SELANGOR)
2 IR PHANG CHEN FAUT (K.LUMPUR)
3 IR WONG YEE FOONG (JOHOR)
4 IR ARUL HISHAM BIN ABDUL RAHIM (SELANGOR)
5 IR WONG KIAT CHOONG (SELANGOR)
6 IR TAN BAK PING (PENANG)
7 MR TAN WEE HAN (SELANGOR)
8 IR LEE KHEK MUI (PENANG)
9 IR LYE KAH HSIUNG (SELANGOR)
10 IR CHAN WENG LOON (SELANGOR)
11 IR ROSHAN THAMARAKSHAN (PENANG)
12 IR TEH CHIN FOO (PENANG)
13 MR WU CHING LEE (SELANGOR)
14 IR. LIM KEK SIA (SELANGOR)
15 MR. VEKNESWARAN ARASAPPAN (K.LUMPUR)
16 IR. TAN WEE KEONG (SELANGOR)
17 IR. MOHAMAD ZAINAL ABIDIN BIN IBRAHIM (TERENGGANU)
18 IR. DR. CHOK LIAN FATT (KEDAH)
19 IR. KUMARASON S. KANDIAH (SELANGOR)
20 MR. LIM CHEAN EE (SELANGOR)
21 MS. LEE AILEEN (SELANGOR)
22 MR. WONG FOOK KEE (SELANGOR)
23 IR. KONG KOK HAW (SELANGOR)
24 IR. POH CHOU CHUEN (K.LUMPUR)
25 IR. MUI HENG CHOR (K.LUMPUR)
26 IR. CHONG VUI HEN @ JOHN (SABAH)
27 MR. RIZA ABDILLAH KAMARUZZAMAN (SELANGOR)
28 IR. BERNAD SAGAIYARAJ (SELANGOR)
29 IR. NG. CHEE SING (SELANGOR)
2nd Verifiers Name
1 IR. KASIM AHMAD (SIRIM BERHAD)
2 EN. MOHAMAD BIN ZAKARIA (CAWANGAN PENANG)
3 CIK NORZAILA NOORDIN, (CAWANGAN MELAKA)
4 EN. KASVENDA KASIM (CAWANGAN SARAWAK)
5 EN. MOHD SOLEHAM JURAIMI KAMARUDIN (CAWANGAN TERENGGANU)
6 EN. AHMAD MIZAN MD. YUSOF, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR
PEMERIKSAAN)
7 EN. NORAZLAN SHAH NORDIN, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR
PEMERIKSAAN)
8 PN. NORIZA MOHAMED SUFIAN, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR
PEMERIKSAAN)
9 PN. NORSHUHADA KAMARUDIN, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR
PEMERIKSAAN)
10 EN. HARMAN ALANG KASIM, PENSIJILAN BARANGAN (SEKTOR PEMERIKSAAN)
11 MR. MUHAMMAD NAZIF ZAKARIA
12 MR. MOHD HAMIZI MOHD SAMSI
Annex V