moral ruckus: vietnam's public opposition/reaction

4
8/3/2019 Moral Ruckus: Vietnam's Public Opposition/Reaction http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/moral-ruckus-vietnams-public-oppositionreaction 1/4  Shahid Mahdi  American Literature Ms. Ellis  The Moral Ruckus: Public Outcry & Opposition to the U.S. Operations in Vietnam  In the past century, the United States has lionised itself with a certain set of basic values.  Values that are fundamental to the drum-beating, hospitable, utopian society that the United States is synonymous for. One of which, I’ve found, happens to be occasional chauvinism. That  being said, this resounding patriotism hasn’t always been uniform, and in times of ambiguous obscurity, the public may very well oppose governmental policy. Throughout the disconcerting course of the Vietnam War, I concluded that pro-American patriotism simply didn’t have a threshold for misinformation. The Vietnam War, which preoccupied the perturbed minds of Americans from the  beginning of American intervention in the Indochinese territory in 1950, (which, as tempers progressively flared, was under French dominion) to its de facto conclusion in 1975. It was one of the determinate factors of popularity for three presidents, from Kennedy to Nixon with Lyndon Johnson sandwiched between the two. The war efforts were, in the eyes of Chester Cooper, in his 1970 work The Lost Crusade: America In Vietnam , professed that it was symbolic of “ American liberalization of our...programs and policies” ; a conflict that, in its  wake, left America “unfulfilled, bitter...restless” at its ultimate withdrawal and consequent defeat. I was bewildered, though expectant, to find that public opinion was deeply divided as  both the war and the American presence in Vietnam escalated. I found that though initial patriotic fervor was contagious in times of war, the reasons for

Upload: shazmahdi23

Post on 06-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Moral Ruckus: Vietnam's Public Opposition/Reaction

8/3/2019 Moral Ruckus: Vietnam's Public Opposition/Reaction

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/moral-ruckus-vietnams-public-oppositionreaction 1/4

 

Shahid Mahdi

 American Literature

Ms. Ellis 

The Moral Ruckus: Public Outcry & Opposition to the U.S. Operations in Vietnam

 

In the past century, the United States has lionised itself with a certain set of basic values.

 Values that are fundamental to the drum-beating, hospitable, utopian society that the United

States is synonymous for. One of which, I’ve found, happens to be occasional chauvinism. That

 being said, this resounding patriotism hasn’t always been uniform, and in times of ambiguous

obscurity, the public may very well oppose governmental policy. Throughout the disconcerting

course of the Vietnam War, I concluded that pro-American patriotism simply didn’t have a

threshold for misinformation.

The Vietnam War, which preoccupied the perturbed minds of Americans from the

 beginning of American intervention in the Indochinese territory in 1950, (which, as tempers

progressively flared, was under French dominion) to its de facto conclusion in 1975. It was one

of the determinate factors of popularity for three presidents, from Kennedy to Nixon with

Lyndon Johnson sandwiched between the two. The war efforts were, in the eyes of Chester

Cooper, in his 1970 work The Lost Crusade: America In Vietnam , professed that it was

symbolic of “ American liberalization of our...programs and policies” ; a conflict that, in its

 wake, left America “unfulfilled, bitter...restless” at its ultimate withdrawal and consequent

defeat. I was bewildered, though expectant, to find that public opinion was deeply divided as

 both the war and the American presence in Vietnam escalated.

I found that though initial patriotic fervor was contagious in times of war, the reasons for

Page 2: Moral Ruckus: Vietnam's Public Opposition/Reaction

8/3/2019 Moral Ruckus: Vietnam's Public Opposition/Reaction

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/moral-ruckus-vietnams-public-oppositionreaction 2/4

 American interference became increasingly vague to the public eye. Men and women of all ages,

particularly the more youthful generations, weren’t sure what to make of this war. Information

regarding stealthy operations were planned and discussed behind closed doors, be it in the

quarters of the White House or the Congressional chambers. Though certain events, such as the

Tế t Offensive, were cleverly exposed to the public to provide justification for the effort, reports

on significant advancements remained strictly classified until the end of the war1. I’ve found

that (debatable up until the past two decades), never before have there been such stealthy tactics

employed by the government to veil atrocities. Soon enough, antiwar factions sprouted from

grassroots, scholarly folk, including MOBE (Mobilization To End The War) or the turbulent SDS

(Students for Democratic Society)both of which staged furious marches. Though these begun in

the nation’s capitol, both eyebrows and white flags were raised as marches in Chicago,

Milwaukee, Baltimore, and New York all occurred. Allison’s History in Dispute revealed that

President Lyndon Johnson went as far as ordering CIA-commissioned investigations into the

schedules of rebellious, counter-culture groups.

Furthermore, I was struck by the drafting process’ evolution from a simple protocol to

one of the most detested policies. The U.S. Armed Forces’ subsidiaries had to assail fears that,

quantitatively speaking, the gruelling casualty rates wouldn’t deplete the army-and thus drafting

and conscription was essential. Unlike preceding conflicts, which opted for men of experience in

 weaponry and warfare, the U.S. forces assigned juveniles to participate in the effort-the average

age of a ground-based soldier in the army was a tender nineteen. Since members of the military 

didn’t wish to continue service aimlessly, they begun confuting service conscription..

Muhammad Ali, in the zenith of physical fitness at the time, was infamously stripped of his titles

upon refusal to draft in the army. Drafting documents were immolated. Though honor was a

 byproduct of military service, opposition to the war outweighed chauvinist pride. Cravings for

the white flag of peace outdid those of the military insignia.

Page 3: Moral Ruckus: Vietnam's Public Opposition/Reaction

8/3/2019 Moral Ruckus: Vietnam's Public Opposition/Reaction

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/moral-ruckus-vietnams-public-oppositionreaction 3/4

Page 4: Moral Ruckus: Vietnam's Public Opposition/Reaction

8/3/2019 Moral Ruckus: Vietnam's Public Opposition/Reaction

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/moral-ruckus-vietnams-public-oppositionreaction 4/4