monitoring schools using cem data david tickner deputy head newcastle school for boys

Monitoring Schools Using CEM Data

David Tickner

Deputy Head

Newcastle School for Boys

Newcastle School for Boys

• Boys’ independent day school

• Formed in 2005

• Continuous education from 3 to 18

• Currently 400 boys

Why did we introduce MidYIS?

• To understand better the boys we work with

• To understand better the potential of those boys

• To enable us to monitor progress better

• To enable us to support our boys better

Who are we working with?MidYIS Year 9/S2 Test Academic Year 2010/2011

Scores Standardised On A Nationally Representative Sample of Schools

Standardised Scores Sort Data By...

Mean Score: 100

Standard Deviation: 15

Vocabulary Maths Non Verbal Skills MidYIS Score

St. S

co

re

Ban

d

St. S

co

re

Ban

d

St. S

co

re

Ban

d

St. S

co

re

Ban

d

St. S

co

re

Ban

d

Average 108.1 109.2 107.1 106.9 108.8

St. error 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5

Student Surname Forename CEM Id Form Sex Cust

APPLETONJACK 4FD-Q2QV M 108 B 123 A 123 A 126 A 116 A

BAINBRIDGEADAM LDD-H6Y3 M 124 A 127 A 114 A 131 A 126 A

CAIRNS CAMERON 8KC-R7AH M 112 A 96 C 97 C 100 C 105 B

CHARLTONALEX 6FD-Q2TJ M 105 B 114 A 100 B 89 D 109 B

CHARLTONMATTHEW 8FD-Q2TK M 89 D 104 B 97 C 96 C 95 C

COULSON-LEEMATTHEW 3910000X M 103 B 117 A 114 A 114 A 110 B

DAWSON RUARIDH AFD-Q2TT M 99 C 99 C 108 B 89 D 99 C

DRAX MICHAEL JMC-H7AB M 112 A 121 A 123 A 125 A 117 A

DU FOSSE WILLIAM 03D-G6YK M 124 A 99 C 117 A 114 A 113 A

ELLIOTT AUSTIN 47D-R6EA M 116 A 120 A 117 A 91 C 118 A

GIBSON CAMERON A9D-Q2C9 M 95 C 95 C 95 C 110 B 94 C

GIBSON CONNOR C9D-Q2E0 M 89 D 90 C 86 D 50 D 89 D

GRAY DANIEL 23D-G6YT M 109 B 120 A 117 A 125 A 114 A

HARDY WILLIAM CFD-Q2TV M 104 B 109 B 108 B 91 C 106 B

HARRISONPETER 39100012 M 99 C 120 A 94 C 80 D 109 B

HIERONS CHRISTOPHERC5D-Q6QQ M 108 B 103 B 97 C 104 B 106 B

HIERONS STEPHEN E5D-Q6QR M 108 B 104 B 98 C 97 C 106 B

HIGGINS LEWIS EFD-Q68J M 125 A 114 A 102 B 121 A 121 A

HOLDEN OLIVER ABD-R2CH M 108 B 120 A 114 A 102 B 114 A

HUMPHREYJOHN QDD-H6YB M 103 B 110 B 114 A 105 B 106 B

KHAN ARBAZ 3910000Y M 91 C 111 A 112 A 78 D 100 C

LENG DANIEL 39100010 M 126 A 114 A 100 B 125 A 121 A

LLOYD-JONESPHILIP AKC-R7AQ M 86 D 102 B 103 B 101 B 92 C

MCCHEYNEREID GFD-Q68K M 104 B 95 C 108 B 97 C 100 C

MIAH SHUHAG AHD-H6T3 M 106 B 101 B 100 B 106 B 103 B

OLD JAMES 2DD-Q2C3 M 131 A 128 A 112 A 144 A 131 A

PAPARONI MATTEO 67D-R6EB M 90 C 115 A 112 A 120 A 102 B

PATTINSONTOM 87D-R6W2 M 107 B 97 C 93 C 109 B 102 B

PAYNE HARRY EHD-H6TB M 118 A 107 B 88 D 114 A 113 A

PRIESTLEYBENJAMIN E9D-Q2E1 M 114 A 104 B 112 A 101 B 109 B

PYLE TOM NRC-G780 M 112 A 123 A 106 B 134 A 118 A

RENFORTHOLIVER JFD-Q68T M 88 D 109 B 110 A 98 C 97 C

RENWICK FREDDIE QRC-G781 M 120 A 98 C 99 C 124 A 110 A

ROWE OLIVER 43D-G6YV M 104 B 114 A 105 B 53 D 109 B

STALKER ROBERT 39100011 M 115 A 108 B 129 A 120 A 112 A

VADEHRA RAHUL 4PC-G6YV M 113 A 99 C 102 B 127 A 107 BVERRILL JACK LFD-Q68V M 132 A 113 A 132 A 144 A 124 A

Sort Data By...

How do they compare?MidYIS Year 9/S2 Historical Band ProfilesScores Standardised on a Nationally Representative Sample of Schools

Year Band A Band B Band C Band D

2011 41 38 19 3

2010 44 44 8 4

2009 45 36 18 0

2008 30 52 17 0

2007 39 43 17 0

Percentage of pupils falling into each MidYIS Band over time.(Band A = Top 25% of the sample, Band D = Bottom 25% of sample.)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Pe

rce

nta

ge

MidYIS Baseline Testing Year

Historical Band Profiles: Overall Score

Band D

Band C

Band B

Band A

Y9Y10Y11Y12Y13

Year Group Average Scores

Current yr group

Vocab. Math. Non-Verbal

Skills Overall

MidYIS

Y13 104.8 113.0 106.0 96.7 108.6

Y12 106.1 107.6 104.9 94.4 106.9

Y11 108.2 109.8 105.5 98.0 109.2

Y10 110.0 107.8 108.0 107.8 109.2

Y9 108.1 109.2 107.1 106.9 108.8

Y8 110.2 108.7 111.1 109.9 110.5

Y7 113.1 110.4 110.7 112.2 113.1

What’s their potential?Predictions & Chances Graphs to GCSE subjects

based on Year 9 nationally standardised scores

Please refer to the Information Sheet for details of

the method used to make these predictions

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Student Surname Forename Sex Form CEM Id Cust Mid

YIS

Score

Mid

YIS

Band

Additio

nal A

pplied S

cie

nce

Additio

nal S

cie

nce

Art &

Desig

n

Bio

logy

Busin

ess S

tudie

s

Chem

istr

y

Cla

ssic

al C

ivilis

ation

Desig

n &

Technolo

gy

Dram

a

Econom

ics

English

English L

iteratu

re

French

Geography

Germ

an

APPLETON JACK M 4FD-Q2QV 116 A C B B A/B B A/B B B B B/C B B B B B/C

BAINBRIDGE ADAM M LDD-H6Y3 126 A B/C A A/B A A A A/B A A/B A/B A A A/B A A/B

CAIRNS CAMERON M 8KC-R7AH 105 B C/D C B/C B C B B/C B/C B/C C C B/C C B/C C

CHARLTON ALEX M 6FD-Q2TJ 109 B C/D B/C B/C B B/C B B B/C B/C C B/C B/C B/C B/C B/C

CHARLTON MATTHEW M 8FD-Q2TK 95 C D C/D C B/C C/D B/C B/C C C D C/D C C/D C/D C/D

COULSON-LEEMATTHEW M 3910000X 110 B C/D B/C B/C B B/C B B B B/C B/C B/C B/C B/C B/C B/C

DAWSON RUARIDH M AFD-Q2TT 99 C D C/D C B/C C/D B/C B/C C C C/D C/D C C/D C C/D

DRAX MICHAEL M JMC-H7AB 117 A C B B A/B B A/B B B B B B B B B B

DU FOSSE WILLIAM M 03D-G6YK 113 A C B B A/B B A/B B B B B/C B B B/C B B/C

ELLIOTT AUSTIN M 47D-R6EA 118 A C A/B B A/B B A/B B A/B B B A/B B B A/B B

GIBSON CAMERON M A9D-Q2C9 94 C D/E C/D C C C/D B/C C C/D C D C/D C/D C/D C/D C/D

GIBSON CONNOR M C9D-Q2E0 89 D D/E D C/D C D C C C/D C/D D D C/D D D D

GRAY DANIEL M 23D-G6YT 114 A C B B A/B B A/B B B B B/C B B B B B/C

HARDY WILLIAM M CFD-Q2TV 106 B C/D B/C B/C B B/C B B/C B/C B/C C B/C B/C C B/C C

HARRISON PETER M 39100012 109 B C/D B/C B/C B B/C B B/C B/C B/C C B/C B/C B/C B/C B/C

HIERONS CHRISTOPHERM C5D-Q6QQ 106 B C/D B/C B/C B B/C B B/C B/C B/C C B/C B/C C B/C C

HIERONS STEPHEN M E5D-Q6QR 106 B C/D B/C B/C B B/C B B/C B/C B/C C B/C B/C C B/C C

HIGGINS LEWIS M EFD-Q68J 121 A B/C A/B A/B A/B A/B A/B B A/B B B A/B A/B A/B A/B B

HOLDEN OLIVER M ABD-R2CH 114 A C B B A/B B A/B B B B B/C B B B B B/C

HUMPHREY JOHN M QDD-H6YB 106 B C/D B/C B/C B B/C B B/C B/C B/C C B/C B/C C B/C C

KHAN ARBAZ M 3910000Y 100 C D C C B/C C B/C B/C C C C/D C C C/D C C/D

LENG DANIEL M 39100010 121 A B/C A/B A/B A/B A/B A B A/B A/B B A/B A/B A/B A/B B

LLOYD-JONESPHILIP M AKC-R7AQ 92 C D/E D C C D C C C/D C D D C/D D C/D D

MCCHEYNE REID M GFD-Q68K 100 C D C C B/C C B/C B/C C C C/D C C C/D C C/D

MIAH SHUHAG M AHD-H6T3 103 B C/D C B/C B/C C B B/C B/C B/C C C B/C C C C

OLD JAMES M 2DD-Q2C3 131 A B A*/A A A*/A A A*/A A/B A A A/B A*/A A A A*/A A

Teacher's

Adju

stm

ent

(G

rades)

Predictions based on 2009 Regression Analysis

MidYIS Year 9 Test Academic Year 2010/2011

GCSE Grade PredictionsGrades To Points Adjust

CEM Centre Scale

QCA Scale

Display Legend

Upper Quartile of Schools

Prior Value added

What’s their potential?

Summary Chances Graphs For JACK APPLETON

0 0 0 15

2633

25

9

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE Additional ScienceTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 1 3 6

28 26 25

12

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE Art & DesignTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 0 1 4

14

26

36

19

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE BiologyTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 1 28

2724 25

13

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE Business StudiesTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 0 1 4

15

26 2925

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE ChemistryTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 0 18

2124

32

13

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE Design & TechnologyTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 0 15

21

37

27

8

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE EnglishTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 0 16

21

3529

7

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE English LiteratureTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 0 311

2228

23

13

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE FrenchTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 1 28

2125

29

14

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE GeographyTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 1 38

15

2733

12

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE HistoryTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

1 0 1 3 4

26 2923

13

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE ICTTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 0 15

22

32 29

10

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE MathematicsTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 1 38

21

31 29

8

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE MusicTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 0 2

1217

28 28

14

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE Physical EducationTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 0 0 16

15

27 30

20

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE PhysicsTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

How do we use MidYIS data to monitor progress?

• At Senior School level

• At subject area level

• At individual pupil level

Senior School LevelAverage Standardised Residuals by Subject

MidYIS Year 9 2007/2008 to GCSE 2010

0.5

-0.1 -0.2

0.0 0.0

0.60.3

-0.5

1.3

0.4 0.50.7 0.8

-0.2

1.6

0.90.70.6

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

Additional S

cience

Art &

Design

Biology

Chem

istry

Design &

Technology

English

English Literature

French

Geography

History

Ict

Mathem

atics

Music

Physical E

ducation

Physics

Religious S

tudies

Science

Spanish

Ave

rag

e S

tan

dar

dis

ed R

esid

ual

Subject Area LevelNumber of Students: 20

MidYIS Test Score: Standardised overall score on Year 9 MidYIS Test

Predicted GCSE Points: Predicted level on the basis of (i) the standardised MidYIS Test score for the student

and (ii) the general pattern of results in this subject this year in the MidYIS Year 9 Sample

Raw Residual: Raw Residual = (Actual GCSE Points Score) - (Predicted GCSE Points Score)

Standardised Residual: Raw Residual standardised to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1

Year 9 Pupil Level Residuals to GCSE 2010 Academic Year 2007/2008

Surname ForenameSex

MidYIS Test

Score

Predicted GCSE Points

Actual GCSE Points

Raw Residual

Standardised Residual

Bielby Jake M 104 5.2 5.0 -0.2 -0.2Boyce Thomas M 95 4.5 5.0 0.5 0.5Brown Ben M 109 5.5 4.0 -1.5 -1.5Dale Dominic M 124 6.7 5.0 -1.7 -1.7Douglass Andrew M 106 5.3 6.0 0.7 0.7Garner Alastair M 118 6.2 5.0 -1.2 -1.2Goldsmith Jack M 95 4.5 5.0 0.5 0.5Hetherington Richard M 102 5.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

Subject: ENGLISH

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170

GC

SE

Po

ints

Sco

re

MidYIS Test Score (Standardised on a Nationally Representative Sample)

Year 9 MidYIS Score 2007/2008 Against GCSE English 2010

Individual Pupil LevelStudent Grade History

28.0

34.0

40.0

46.0

52.0

58.0

Assessment Period

Ave

rage

QC

A p

oint

s pe

r su

bjec

t

Pattinson H

MidYIS

Target

Student

A*

A

B

C

D

E

T:\Senior School\Academic and Curriculum\Subject Areas\Science\1 Assessment\GCSE\Targets\Y11 targets 1011

Individual Pupil Level

Student Grade History

28.0

34.0

40.0

46.0

52.0

58.0

Assessment Period

Ave

rage

QC

A p

oint

s pe

r su

bjec

t

Howie S

MidYIS

Target

Student

A*

A

B

C

D

E


Individual Pupil LevelStudent Grade History

28.0

34.0

40.0

46.0

52.0

58.0

Assessment Period

Ave

rage

QC

A p

oint

s pe

r su

bjec

t

Harding A

MidYIS

Target

Student

A*

A

B

C

D

E


Pupil A - IPRIndividual Pupil Record UBAYDULLAH IQBALDate Of Birth: 24/08/93 Student Number:Sex: M Form: 9DT

MidYIS Band Stanine PercentileStandard

ScoreVocabulary C 4 34 94

Maths A 7 77 111

Non-Verbal B 6 71 108

Skills C 5 50 100

MidYIS Score B 5 52 101

Nationally Standardised Scores with 95% Confidence Band

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

Vocabulary Maths Non-Verbal Skills MidYIS Score

Nat

iona

lly S

tand

ardi

sed

Scor

es

Pupil A – Chances Graphs

1 1 3 4

14

31 28

15

3

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


1 1 1 4

15

3326

15

4

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


2 3 611

2329

169

2

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade

GCSE Design & TechnologyTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

0 1 311

26

36

19

50

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


1 1 411

23

33

20

61

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 28

16

28 29

124 1

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


1 3 612

2330

158

2

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


3 5 711

18

28

17

81

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 15

1423

35

16

40

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


1 0 1 4

17

3426

14

3

05

1015202530354045

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


Pupil B - IPRIndividual Pupil Record CHRISTOPHER DRYDate Of Birth: 01/11/92 Student Number:Sex: M Form: 9DT


ScoreVocabulary C 3 33 93

Maths C 3 27 91

Non-Verbal D 3 21 88

Skills B 5 59 103

MidYIS Score C 3 26 91


50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150


Nat

iona

lly S

tand

ardi

sed

Scor

es

Pupil B – Chances Graphs

1 39

19

30 28

81 0

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade

GCSE Additional ScienceTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

1 310

22

3224

71 0

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


5 410

1927 24

92 0

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


29

1824 26

16

4 1 005

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


6 813

1924

21

72 0

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


9 9 1215

1922

103 0

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


3 6

16

26 2520

51 0

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


1 4

12

2228 27

61 0

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade

GCSE ScienceTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

310

1723 25

16

52 0

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade

GCSE SpanishTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

Pupil C - IPRIndividual Pupil Record HENRY PERCY-RAINEDate Of Birth: 04/01/94 Student Number:Sex: M Form: 9SG


ScoreVocabulary B 6 63 105

Maths A 8 93 122

Non-Verbal B 6 62 105

Skills B 6 60 104

MidYIS Score A 7 81 113


50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150


Nat

iona

lly S

tand

ardi

sed

Scor

es

Pupil C – Chances Graphs

0 0 1 15

20

31 30

13

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 0 0 16

2229 28

14

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 0 0 2

10

3034

19

3

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 0 1 4

12

29 32

19

3

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 0 15

16

3124

15

6

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 0 1 412

2824

21

9

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 1 36

12

2027

23

8

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


1 1 3 612

27 2518

6

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 0 1 39

3033

19

4

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


0 0 0 16

21

30 29

13

05

10152025303540

U G F E D C B A A*

Perc

ent

Grade


Pupil D - IPRMidYIS Band Stanine Percentile

Standard Score

Vocabulary A 9 98 130

Maths A 9 97 129

Non-Verbal A 8 93 123

Skills C 5 41 97


MidYIS Band 25% of nationally representative sample is in each band (A = highest)

Stanine One of nine divisions of the Normal distribution (9 = highest)

Percentile Percentage of the nationally representative sample scoring less than this student

Standard Score Score standardised against a nationally representative sample

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150


Nati

on

all

y S

tan

dard

ised

S

co

res


Pupil D – Chances Graphs

0 0 0 0 1 415

34

47

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade


0 0 0 0 1 515

32

47

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade


0 0 0 0 16

22

4131

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade


0 0 0 0 29

25

40

24

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade


0 0 0 0 28

16

30

44

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade


0 0 0 1 2 717

35 38

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade


0 0 0 0 0 4

17

37 41

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade


0 0 0 0 0 413

31

52

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade


0 0 0 1 2 616

31

45

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

U G F E D C B A A*

Pe

rce

nt

Grade

GCSE Religious StudiesTeacher's Adjustment : 0 grade(s)

Support for LearningIndividual Pupil Record HARRY PAYNEDate Of Birth: 18/8/97 Student Number:Sex: M Form:


ScoreVocabulary A 7 88 118

Maths B 6 67 107

Non-Verbal D 3 21 88

Skills A 7 82 114


50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150


Nati

on

all

y S

tan

dard

ised

S

co

res


Change Pupil

HELP

Print IPRs

Support for LearningIndividual Pupil Record AUSTIN ELLIOTTDate Of Birth: 2/3/97 Student Number:Sex: M Form:


ScoreVocabulary A 7 86 116

Maths A 8 90 120

Non-Verbal A 7 87 117

Skills C 4 28 91


50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150


Nati

on

all

y S

tan

dard

ised

S

co

res


Change Pupil

HELP

Print IPRs

ALIS• Similarities with MidYIS: baseline data,

chances graphs and value added feedback

• Further sophistication of data

• Other data

InCAS

• Breadth of data – individual and comprehensive

• Standardised data – context

• Computer adaptive – boy friendly

• Continuity

What’s Been Learnt?

• Complementary not fundamental

• Wider context

• Importance of staff training: debunking myths and building staff confidence

Next Steps For Us?

• Continue to develop use of data as a means of raising our boys’ attainment

• Longer term usefulness of data in monitoring performance

• Wider sharing of data with parents• Explore more systematic use of data in

screening for Specific Learning Difficulties• Explore use of attitudinal data• Explore online entrance testing• Implement InCAS in Junior School

Contact Details

If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me:

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

monitoring schools using cem data david tickner deputy head newcastle school for boys

Documents

boysnewcastle school

boys betterwho

progress betterto

midyis data

bowmanda ks4

monitoring schools

continuous education

ball t2bowman d96c