mol group · mol is an integrated oil and gas company… operating through the whole value chain...
TRANSCRIPT
1
MOL GROUP
Fixed Income Investor Presentation
May 2014
2
MARKET CAPITALIZATION
MOL AT A GLANCE
EBITDA GENERATION IN 2013 2/3 from Upstream, ~50% from international operation
USD 2.2bn
USD 6.2bn
NET GEARING (2013) – STRONG BALANCE SHEET
EMPLOYEES IN 40 COUNTRIES
16%
almost 29.000
Overvie
w
INVESTMENT GRADE RATED BY FITCH MOL’s rating is higher than Hungary; BB at S&P
BBB-
3
MOL IS AN INTEGRATED OIL AND GAS COMPANY… Operating through the whole value chain
Production in 8 countries
Exploration in 13 countries
96 mboepd production at end of Q1 20141
576 MMboe SPE 2P reserves at the end of 20132
4 Refineries with 417 mboepd nameplate capacity
2 Petrochemical plants
19 Mtpa sales
1,900+ filling stations3
16% Net gearing (2013)
1.02x Net debt to EBITDA
EUR 4.0bn available liquidity
CAPEX should be financed from operating CF
Overvie
w
UPSTREAM „Growth”
DOWNSTREAM „Efficiency & restructuring”
FINANCIALS „Stability”
(1) Already excluding 49% of Baitex LLC, which was sold at the end of Q1 2014 (2) 2013 year-end SPE-2P, 2P reserves of North Sea assets not included yet, to be booked in 2014 (3) Including the recently published agreement about acquiring 208 service stations from eni Group
4
…WHICH IS MORE AND MORE UPSTREAM DRIVEN & INTERNATIONAL
Majority of revenue and EBITDA generated outside of Hungary
Overvie
w
~75%
generated outside of Hungary
* Excluding special items
Hungary 27%
Croatia 13% Other
CEE** 41%
Rest of the World 19%
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 500
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Upstream Syria
Downstream Gas midstream
EBITDA* GENERATION BY SEGMENT (USD MN) REVENUE GENERATION BY COUNTRY (2013)
** including: ITA 11%; AUR 9%; SLK 8%; CZR 6%; ROM 6%
5
OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS
6
24%
36%
23%
6%
7% 4%
Hungary CroatiaRussia SyriaKazakhstan Other
**SPE 2P reserves at the end of 2013. Not containing 28MMboe 2P reserves of North Sea acquisition, closed in Q1 2014. Reserves and production of non-consolidated projects are not highlighted.
*Already excluding contribution of 49% of Baitugan field, divested at the end of Q1 2014
Existing reserve base ensures strong cash generation
Healthy reserve base: ~16 years 2P reserves life
Minimizing decline rate below 5% in the lower risk, strong cash generator CEE region
Lowest unit production cost among European peers
16y Reserve
life
UPSTREAM: EXISTING RESERVE BASE ENSURES STRONG PROFITABILITY
Growing production from 2H 2014, >75% to come from the high return, lower risk CEE region
Up
stream
576 MMboe
43%
38%
7%
6% 6%
Hungary Croatia Russia
Pakistan Other
96 mboepd
RESERVES (SPE 2P) END 2013** PRODUCTION 2014 Q1*
7
SIZEABLE EXPLORATION POTENTIAL WITH INTERNATIONAL FOCUS
Exploration activity in 13 countries, key projects in late appraisal phase
*Working Interest (unrisked).
Exploration successes are the basis of long-term growth Outstanding, ~60% exploration success rate in the last 5 years
Still sizeable prospects in the core CEE region…
…but even greater international potentials: CIS, Kurdistan R.I.
Above 100% Reserve Replacement Ratio targeted in 3 years average
Up
stream
250
442
337
1 518
489
Total 2P reserves +
Recoverable Resource
Other CIS CEE KRI
RECOVERABLE RESOURCE POTENTIAL* + 2P RESERVES, MMBOE
8
Unique know-how and infrastructure
Several ongoing development projects to mitigate production decline as much as possible
Active exploration programs on existing license areas and looking for new licences
HUNGARY+CROATIA (349 MMboe) - PRODUCTION OUTLOOK
Ongoing development projects to turn back production to growth path by 2015
EOR project implementation on Ivana and Zutica fields with ~30 MMboe incremental production
Medimurje project to target 7 MMboe natural gas reserve – infrastructure development to be finished in 2015
Offshore gas production expected to be stabilized around 10-12 mboepd for the coming years (i.e. IKA JZ development project)
CEE: MINIMALIZE DECLINE RATE TO LOW SINGLE DIGIT LEVEL
Croatia: Back to production growth by 2015
CROATIA WORK PROGRAM
0
20
40
60
80
mb
oep
d
~2018 2015 2014
Production Unrisked exploration upside
Production 2013: 80 mboepd II Reserves: SPE 2P 2013: 349 MMboe
POS
high
Up
stream
9
KURDISTAN R.I.: ACCELERATED DEVELOPMENT TO ENHANCE CASH
GENERATION
Export started from Shaikan, Commercial production to start on Akri-Bijeel by H2
Commercial discoveries (Bijell, Bakrman, Shaikan)
Accelerated work programs to enhance cash-flow generation as soon as possible
Reserve bookings in the next two years from two blocks
First export from Shaikan in January 2014, commercial production to start on Akri-Bijeel by H2
Phased development program submitted for Akri-B.
KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ
2010-12/2012-14– Exploration and appraisal program
2013/2014 - Start of Field development and commercial production
MOL net production: ~20-25 mboepd in 2017-18*
Recoverable resource potential (unrisked, Working Interests based w fully diluted share): 250 MMboe
* Unrisked, Entitlement share based on fully diluted working interest.
0
10
20
30
mb
oep
d
~2018 2015 2014 Akri (unrisked) Shaikan
POS
high
PRODUCTION OUTLOOK - WORK PROGRAM (SH/AB).
Up
stream
10
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Broom
Cladhan
Catcher
S.&C. (opt.)
NORTH SEA: SIZEABLE SHORT/MID-TERM PRODUCTION WITH ABOVE AVG UNIT
PROFITABILITY
Expected peak production of 16-18 mboepd in 2018-2019
NORTH SEA (28 MMboe*)
PRODUCTION OUTLOOK - WORK PROGRAM
0
5
10
15
20
2018 2015 2014
mb
oep
d
Production Unrisked exploration upside
POS
high
OVERVIEW OF MAIN PRODUCING ASSETS
Block W.I. Operating
shareholder Other partner
Broom 29% Enquest
(63%) Ithaca (8%)
Cladhan 33% TAQA (53%) Sterling (14%)
Catcher 20% Premier Oil
(50%) Cairn Energy
(30%)
Scolty&Crathes 50% Enquest
(40%) Ithaca (10%)
* To be booked in 2014; ** MOL estimate
FDP
Majority of asset portfolio already in development or production phase
Further 9 MMboe** 2C contingent resource and 10 MMboe P50 unrisked prospective resource
Practically only oil production (97%) implying over USD 70/boe EBITDA on life cycle basis
Sanction & FDP
Development Production
Up
stream
11
60
40
20
0
140
120
100
80
~30%
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
mb
oep
d
North Sea CIS/Asia
Middle East/Africa CEE ZMB+Baitugan 49%*
ORGANIC* PRODUCTION POTENTIAL GROWTH IN 5 YEARS With major contributions from Middle East and North Sea areas with high unit EBITDA
BY 2015 APPROXIMATELY 10%
PRODUCTION GROWTH*
Accelerated field development projects in CEE with growth in CRO
Ramp up of production in Kurdistan in Akri Bijeel and Shaikan fields
Initial phase on North Sea assets
APPROXIMATELY 30% INCREASE BY
~2018*
Kurdistan production target 20-25 mboepd**
North Sea assets to peak around 18 mboepd
Both have over USD 70/boe unit profitability on lifecycle basis
To offset the decline on maturing CEE fields
PRODUCTION OUTLOOK* (RISKED,
ENTITLEMENT BASED)
*Russian ZMB field was divested in early August 2013 while 49% stake of Russian Baitugan in Q1 2014 thus excluded from the projected production figures as well as the comparison basis year of 2013
**Unrisked, Entitlement share based on fully diluted working interest
91-96 105-110 125-135
Up
stream
12
GOING FORWARD: ACTIVE M&A TO STEP INTO A NEW LEAGUE Focusing on value creation over volume growth, targeting a balanced portfolio
HUMAN CAPITAL – REVITALIZING STAFF AND ORGANIZATION
CAPABILITIES TO SELECT GOOD ITEMS AND MANAGE INTEGRATIONS
RESISTANT TO ’DEAL FEVER’
…AND FINANCIAL READINESS
RIGOROUS CAPITAL DISCIPLINE
IMPROVING OVERALL RISK PROFILE OF THE PORTFOLIO
FOCUSED GEOGRAPHICAL DIVERSIFICATION
ESTABLISH NEW STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS (E.G. WINTERSHALL, TPAO)
POTENTIAL FARM OUTS (PARTIAL) ALSO POSSIBLE TO SHARE RISKS AND OPTIMIZE PROJECTS FINANCING
NORTH SEA NEW REGIONS IN ORDER TO…
Enhance shallow offshore experience and create a new hub
Decreasing average political risk profile of MOL Group’s upstream portfolio
Access to upcoming UK Exploration Bid Rounds with further value creation
MIDDLE EAST / PAKISTAN /CIS TRADITIONAL CORE REGIONS WITH…
Notable technical know-how
Well established strategic partnerships
Major projects in Kurdistan R. of Iraq
Excellent relationship with local communities
KEY PRINCIPLES AND GOALS CRITICAL CAPABILITIES FOR SUCCESSFUL M&A
Up
stream
13
Bratislava
Danube
Sisak
Rijeka
DOWNSTREAM: MAXIMIZE FREE CASH GENRATION WITH ’CEE CITADEL’ MODEL
Integrated operation on the landlocked CEE market with efficiency improvement in the focus
KEY STRENGTH
Complex, diesel geared refineries
Integrated petrochemical units to handle surplus gasoline/naphtha pool
Strong land-locked market presence – 20% motor fuel market share in the CEE; market leader in 4 countries
Region-wide Logistics, Wholesale and Retail network serve the market - above 55% end-user share
Refinery Mtpa thbpd NCI
MOL Group 20.9 417 10.0
Danube 8.1 161 10.6
Bratislava 6.1 122 11.5
Rijeka 4.5 90 9.1
Sisak 2.2 44 6.1
REFINERY YIELD 2014E
over
80% white prd.
19.4 Mt refined product & petrochemical sales
Retail: 1.900+(1) FS w. 3.5 Mtpa sales
Petchem: 1.3 Mt ext. sales
Do
wn
stream
2013 FIGURES REFINERY CAPACITY & COMPLEXITY
3% 9%
20%
52%
4% 3%
3% 6% LPG
Naphtha
Motor Gasoline
Middle Distillates
Fuel Oil
Bitumen
Other
Other chemical prds.
(1) Including the recently published agreement about acquiring 208 filling stations from eni Group
14
CLEAN CCS-BASED DS* UNIT EBITDA (USD/BBL)
Source: Company flash reports, MOL Strategy Research; Note: MOL Group figures include INA data from Q3 2009 *excluding Petchem
MOL DELIVERS TOP QUARTILE PERFORMANCE IN TOUGH ENVIRONMENT However, still significant gap to pre-crisis level profitability, less efficient units below break even
REFINERY MARGIN (URAL-MED, USD/BBL)
Do
wn
stream
CLEAN CCS-BASED DS EBITDA (MN USD)
670 700
2012 2013
+4%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
-60%
15
USD 400MN EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT WAS DELIVERED BY 2013 >USD 100mn is still due in 2014
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2012 2013 2014 NDSP total
Σ USD 150mn
Σ USD 500-550mn
Σ USD 400mn
Cost decrease USD 370-400mn
Revenue increase USD 130-150mn Sales strategy
NDSP BREAKDOWN BY YEARS (MN USD) NDSP BREAKDOWN BY CATEGORIES (%)
22%
15%
15%
21%
19%
8%
Maintenance management
Production flexibility improvement
Other costs
Energy management
SCM-driven improvement
Rev
en
ue
C
ost
16
-9%
-6%
-3%
0%
3%
6%
Q12012
Q22012
Q32012
Q42012
Q12013
Q22013
Q32013
Q42013
2014 F
Core market demand CEE demand
Source: MOL estimates
CONTINUATION OF MODEST DEMAND INCREASE IS EXPECTED IN 2014
…as the regional economic recovery continues
Modest GDP growth (1.5%<) is expected in the core countries
Motor fuel growth will lag behind GDP up-lift, still moderate demand increase is realistic (~0.5% in Core3, ~1% in CEE)
Similarly to previous years consumption will be driven by gasoil
GDP AND MOTOR FUEL GROWTH (2014E, YOY CHANGE %) REGIONAL MOTOR FUEL DEMAND (YOY CHANGE %)
Following deep demand drop in recent years „Core 3” and CEE reached the bottom in early 2013
Growth already started and expected to continue in 2014
Forecast
Source: MOL
GDP
-1,5%
-0,5%
0,5%
1,5%
2,5%
1
2.0
Market (mn kt)
GDP
3.9 2.0
Core3: Hungary, Slovakia, Croatia
Do
wn
stream
52%
43%
2% 3% Gas Midstream
Downstream Strict control on sustain CAPEX
Selective profitable growth investments (50%)
LDPE4 in Slovnaft
Butadiene and S-SBR in MOL
Upstream Balance between early cash generation…
CEE
and creation of mid-long term growth potential:
Kurdistan Region of Iraq; Russia and Kazakhstan, North Sea
Contingency, C&O
17
CAPEX 2014
USD 1.6-1.9BN CAPEX PLANNED FOR 2014 WITH UPSTREAM FOCUS
Downstream spending to peak in 2014-15 due to ongoing growth projects
ORGANIC CAPEX SHOULD BE FINANCED FROM OPERATING CASH-FLOW
Up to USD 2bn CAPEX per annum in the next three years
Adequate flexibility: maintenance CAPEX & key growth projects could be covered by USD ~1bn
CA
PEX
52%
22%
26% Maintenance Growth
Exploration
18
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
19
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 500
4 000
4 500
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Organic Inorganic Dividends paid Operating CF
CONSERVATIVE FINANCIAL POLICY
CAPEX and small acquisitions should be financed from operating cash flow
INA
Pearl
OPERATING CASH-FLOW VS CAPEX AND DIVIDENDS (MN USD)
Finan
cials
20
NET DEBT TO EBITDA (X) GEARING (%)
CONTINUOUSLY STRENGTHENING FINANCIAL POSITION Indebtedness indicators at a 6-year low
KEEP COVENANTS IN THE SAFETY ZONE – IMPROVING GEARING POSITION
WELL BELOW INTERNAL LIMITS OF
NET DEBT TO EBITDA ~ 2.0X, NET GEARING ~ 30%
1,96 1,66
1,72
1,44 1,38
0,79
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Threshold of net debt to EBITDA
36 33
31 28
25
16
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Finan
cials
21
MOL HAS SUFFICIENT LIQUIDITY FOR ACQUISITIONS… EUR 4 bn total available liquidity as of Q1 2014
DRAWN VERSUS UNDRAWN FACILITIES (EUR MILLION) TOTAL AVAILABLE LIQUIDITY (EUR MILLION)
Finan
cials
22
…FROM DIVERSIFIED FUNDING SOURCES Cost rationalization keeping diversification in mind
MID- AND LONG-TERM COMMITTED FUNDING PORTFOLIO
*based on FX rates as of 31 March 2014
OUTSTANDING SENIOR AND HYBRID BONDS
RECENT EVENTS
USD 545m Revolving Credit Facility extended from 2016 to 2017
MOL prepaid the EIB project loan (value USD 158m) taken in 2010.
MOL prepaid the EBRD loan taken in 2009, as
consequence of the MMBF divestment
EUR 200m Revolving Credit Facility concluded for Slovnaft – December 2013
FIXED VS FLOATING INTEREST RATE PAYMENT OF TOTAL DEBT
Issuer CcyVolume
(m)
Volume
(EURm)*
Issue
date
Maturity
dateCoupon
MOL Plc EUR 750 750 05-Oct-2005 05-Oct-2015 3.875%
MOL Plc EUR 750 750 20-Apr-2010 20-Apr-2017 5.875%
MOL Group Finance S.A.
guaranteed by MOL PlcUSD 500 363 26-Sep-2012 26-Sep-2019 6.25%
Magnolia Finance Ltd EUR 610 610 20-Mar-2006 Perpetual4% till Mar-2016 then
3m EURIBOR +550bps
Finan
cials
23
1 489
750 750
363
96
475
991
514
460
0
200
400
600
800
1 000
1 200
1 400
1 600
Reportedcash&cashequivalents
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
EU
R M
Long term loan (multilaterals) Senior Unsecured Bonds
Medium term loan Undrawn facilities
NO CONCENTRATED REFINANCING NEED
HEALTHY MATURITY PROFILE
*as of 31. 03. 2014
REFINANCING SECURED FOR 3 YEARS
Finan
cials
24
Keep ‘FFO/Net Debt’ ratio in its current healthy zone
Maintain current investment grade rating at Fitch and aiming upgrade at S&P
CREDIT RATING ABOVE SOVEREIGN RATING AT FITCH, IN LINE
WITH THAT AT S&P
*Funds from operation, adjusted. S&P might have additional adjustments.
FFO/NET DEBT* HISTORICAL FOREIGN LONG TERM RATINGS
BBB- (negative outlook) by Fitch Ratings
BB (stable outlook) by Standard & Poor’s
Finan
cials
MOL S&P Hungary S&P MOL Fitch Hungary Fitch
: INTERMEDIATE financial risk assessment range by S&P
25
IMPROVING SPREAD PERFORMANCE VERSUS REPHUN & PEER’S
BONDS
Finan
cials
USD - MOL/REPHUN SECONDARY PERFORMANCE
EUR - MOL/REPHUN SECONDARY PERFORMANCE
MOL/REPSOL (EUR) SECONDARY PERFORMANCE
MOL/OMV (EUR) SECONDARY PERFORMANCE
26
BENCHMARKING MOL WITH RATED PEERS Business Profile Assessment
Finan
cials
MOL PKN Repsol Tupras OMV
Revenues (FY 2013) $mn 25 393 39 845 76 740 21 595 58 388
EBITDA Margin (%) % 9,6% 3,6% 11,2% 2,6% 10,2%
2P Reserves Mmboe 576 n/a 1,515 (1P) n/a 1 916
Production (FY 2013) mboepd 103 n/a 346 n/a 288
Cost of Production $/boe <10 n/a n/a n/a 14,0
F&D Costs $/boe 25 (1P) n/a 21 (1P) n/a 36 (1P)
Large Refineries # 2 2 6 3 1
Refining Capacity mboepd 417 564 998 582 360
Segment Breakdown EBITDA
Geographic
BreakdownRevenue
Reserves per region 2P*
Moody's -- Baa3 Baa3 Ba1 A3
S&P BB -- BBB- -- --
Fitch BBB- BBB- BBB- BBB- A-
Long Term
Foreign
Issuer
Credit
Turkey100%
E&P47%
LNG16%
R&M13%
Gas24%
Downstream100%
R&M60%
Petchem40%
Austria35%
TUR16%
Rest of CEE9%
Rest of Europe
34%
RoW6%
E&P68%
G&P2%
R&M30%
Romania63%Austria
9%
NW EU, Africa &
AU24%
ME & Caspian
4%
South America
85%
N-AM3%
AFR9%
Asia3%
POL43%
DE16%
CZE11%
Baltics9%
Other21%
ESP53%
EU10%
OECD16%
Other21%
CRO 36%
HUN 24%
RUS 23%
PAK 3%
KAZ 6% Other
8%
na
E& P 69%
Gas 11%
R&M 20%
HUN 27%
CRO 13%
Other CEE 29%
Other 31%
• Where available, OMV only reports 1P; Rating data from Bloomberg, as of 14 May 2014
Source: Internal data and company reports
na
27 Data from: Standard and Poor’s Global Credit Portal, adjusted ratios
3 years average data (2011-2013) where available, at BG Energy, Eni and Repsol (2010-2012)
PEER COMPARISON: MOL IS ESPECIALLY STRONG ON
SUPPLEMENTARY RATIOS And everywhere reaches at least the intermediate range
DEBT / EBITDA – 3 years average FFO / DEBT – 3 years average
FOCF AND DCF / DEBT – 3 years average CFO / DEBT – 3 years average
Fin
an
cia
ls
1,4
2,32
1,76
2,57
1,39
1,17
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3
Tullow
MOL
Noble energy
Repsol
BG energy
Eni
60,90%
36,18%
49,46%
22,39%
49,81%
43,82%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
Tullow
MOL
Noble energy
Repsol
BG energy
Eni
-20,00%
-15,00%
-10,00%
-5,00%
0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
Tullow MOL Nobleenergy
Repsol BG energy Eni
FOCF / Debt DCF / Debt
: Modest
: Intermediate
: Significant
38,61%
35,10%
42,86%
27,77%
52,36%
51,10%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125%
Tullow (BB)
MOL (BB)
Noble energy (BBB)
Repsol (BBB-)
BG energy (A-)
Eni (A)
Financial Risk Assessment Ratio:
28
UPSTREAM: STRONG PROFIT GENERATION OF LEGACY ASSETS –
ORGANIC GROWTH WITH IMPROVING UNIT EBITDA
UPSTREAM: INORGANIC GROWTH FOCUSED ON DELIVERING A
BALANCED PORTFOLIO
DOWNSTREAM: AMONG THE BESTS WITH INTEGRATED OPERATION
OF COMPLEX ASSETS – KEY FOCUS IS ON EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT
~$6.2BN MARKET CAP.
$2.2BN EBITDA: 2/3 FROM UPSTREAM, ~50% OUTSIDE HUNGARY
PROVEN TRANSFORMATION TRACK RECORD OF THE MANAGEMENT
CAPEX SHOULD BE FINANCED FROM OPERATING CF
DECREASING INDEBTEDNESS: LOWEST NET GEARING AT A 6-YEAR LOW
INVESTMENT GRADE RATED BY FITCH (BBB-) AND BB+ RATED BY S&P
FIN
AN
CIA
LS
STRONG BALANCE SHEET HAS TOP PRIORITY
INTEGRATED MODEL WITH UPSTREAM FOCUS
AN INTERNATIONAL OIL & GAS COMPANY
BU
SIN
ES
SE
S
MO
L G
RO
UP
KEY GOALS AND MESSAGES
Sum
mary
29
APPENDIX
30
SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE As of 31 March 2014
Please note, that the data above does not fully reflect the ownership structure in MOL’s share register. Registration in the share register is not mandatory. In order for shareholders to exercise their rights as shareholders of MOL they must be registered in the share register. According to the Articles of Association no shareholder or shareholder group may exercise more than 10% of the voting rights.
DIVERSIFIED SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE
Foreign investors (mainly institutional) 25.3%
Hungarian State 24.7%
CEZ MH B.V. 7.3%
OmanOil (Budapest) Limited 7.0%
OTP Bank Plc. 5.4%
Magnolia Finance Limited 5.7%
ING Bank N.V. 5.0%
Crescent Petroleum 3.0%
Dana Gas PJSC 1.4%
UniCredit Bank AG 3.9%
Credit Agricole 2.0%
Domestic institutional investors 2.4%
Domestic private investors 4.3%
MOL Nyrt. (treasury shares) 2.4%
Ap
pen
dix
31
KEY ITEMS OF TAXATION Positive effect vs. 2012 level
Revenue based ’Crisis tax’ abolished from 2013 – ~HUF 30bn negative effect p.a. in 2010-12
Profit based ’Robin Hood’ nominal tax rate is 31%
only energy related part of the profit affected (~70%), thus implied RH tax rate is cca. 22%
only the Hungarian operation of certain companies are affected (i.e: MOL Plc., while gas transmission (FGSZ) or petrochemicals (TVK) are not subject of the tax)
CIT tax rate is 19%
Croatia & Slovakia:
20% CRO & 22% SVK CIT rates applicable in 2014
Group level tax payments in the last 3 years:
HUF bn 2011 2012 2013
Special „ crisis” tax – CANCELLED end 2012 (HUN) 29 30 -
Robin Hood – (HUN) 3 1 0
Corporate income tax 44 17 20
Sum 77 48 20
HUNGARY
CROATIA & SLOVAKIA
Ap
pen
dix
32
MOL INVESTOR RELATIONS Reporting Calendar and Important Links
DATE EVENT
1 August 2014 Release of 2014. H1 results
6 November 2014 Release of 2014. III. quarter results
INFO CONTENT LINK
MOL Investor Relations http://ir.mol.hu/en/ir-service/contact/
Latest Investor Presentation http://ir.mol.hu/en
MOL Group Financial Results http://ir.mol.hu/en/financial-reports/latest-flash-report_/summary/
Regulated Information http://ir.mol.hu/en/regulated_info/2013/
CONTACT
Address: Hungary, 1117 Budapest, Október huszonharmadika u. 18.
Phone: +36 1 464-1395
E-mail: [email protected]
Ap
pen
dix