mm ii - group 1

Upload: raj-maana

Post on 08-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    1/45

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    2/45

    LOGO

    ContentsContents

    Introduction

    1

    Marketing & Research Objective2

    3 Qualitative Research

    4

    5

    Quantitative Research

    Conclusion

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    3/45

    LOGO

    About ITCAbout ITC

    Market Capitalization : US $18 BillionTurnover : US $4.75 Billion

    Indias Top 10 Most Valuable (Company)Brands

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    4/45

    LOGO

    Diversified PresenceDiversified Presence

    Cigarettes

    Hotels

    PaperPackaging

    Agri-Business

    Packaged Food & Confectionery

    IT

    Branded Apparel

    Personal Care, Greeting Cards and other FMCG

    products

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    5/45

    LOGO

    Bingo!Bingo!

    Array of products inboth Potato Chips &Finger Snacks

    segment

    Branded snackmarket growing at30% every year

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    6/45

    LOGO

    Offerings from Bingo!Offerings from Bingo!

    Initial Offerings: Potato Chips

    Finger Snacks Segment

    Potato Chips Variant Masala Flavours

    Salted Flavours

    Tomato Flavours

    South Inspired

    Finger Snacks Offerings Pakoda inspired LiveWires

    Khakra inspired Mad Angles

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    7/45

    LOGO

    Target CustomersTarget Customers

    Type: Youthful, Innovators

    Age Group: 20-35

    Customer Type: Packed-snack-on-the-goCategory: Impulse Buy Category

    Hotels, Restaurant, Cafes

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    8/45

    LOGO

    CompetitorsCompetitors

    Frito Lays

    Kurkure

    Haldirams

    Uncle Chips

    Regional snacks

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    9/45

    LOGO Market Position of

    Bingo!

    Market Position of

    Bingo!

    The Indian Snack Industry is about 2500 crores

    Market Share as on December 2008

    Frito Lays

    48%

    Haldiram

    25%

    Bingo!

    16%

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    10/45

    LOGO

    Marketing ObjectiveMarketing Objective

    Positioning of Bingo! in the snack foodindustry

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    11/45

    LOGO

    Research ObjectiveResearch Objective

    Find key driving factors in the snack industry

    Identify competitors for Bingo! in the industry

    Competitive advantage of Bingo! in its category

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    12/45

    LOGO

    Key Information AreasKey Information Areas

    Consumer Profile

    Product characteristics

    Product ReachInfluencers

    Brand awareness

    Consumption patterns

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    13/45

    LOGO

    VariablesVariables

    ConsumerProfile

    Age

    Gender

    Income

    Occupation

    Marital Status

    City

    Access to Home food

    Frequency of snackconsumption

    Health Conciousness

    Taste Preference

    ProductCharacteristics

    Taste

    Quality

    Lickability

    Packaging

    Variety

    Value

    Price

    Product Reach

    Availability

    Influencers

    Peer Groups

    Past Experience

    PromotionalMeasures

    Brandawareness

    Brand Recall

    Consumptionpatterns

    Frequency

    Purpose

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    14/45

    LOGO

    Research MethodologyResearch Methodology

    Qualitative

    Focus Group Discussion (8 members) 1

    Semi-structured question pattern

    In-depth Interviews (Individual) 10

    Semi-structured question pattern

    This data is not used for statistical analysis

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    15/45

    LOGO

    Research MethodologyResearch Methodology

    Quantitative

    Survey Questionnaire

    Sample size 115

    Age group of sample Between 15 to 40 years

    Pilot study with 20 respondents was done beforelaunching the final survey questionnaire

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    16/45

    LOGO ualitative Research -

    FGD

    Qualitative Research -

    FGD Homogenous group of students within Age Group 20-25 -Confident,dressed casually

    No access to home food, do not prefer the regular food Lack of time, stressed schedule, work late in the night

    Group Profile

    Anything from Samosa and chat to chips, biscuits and chocolates Most of them preferred Indian snack like samosa, pani puri to similar

    flavours in packeted food

    Prefer Quick Snacks

    Snack Industry

    Try new flavours Anything on the shelf, depends on the mood when the packet is picked

    Chips & Finger Snack Industry

    All aware of product Most knew the brand because of the Ad, but do not like the Ad as such

    Bingo Awareness

    Some did not try because it is not available Others like their regular flavours

    Intention to purchase

    Peer Groups Past Experience

    Influencers

    Something that tastes good Time Pass

    Purpose

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    17/45

    LOGO Qualitative Research -

    FGD

    Qualitative Research -

    FGDTOMA

    Snack Industry Samosa, BiscuitsChips & Finger Snack Industry Lays

    SpontaneousSnack Industry Biscuites, Cake, Carbonatedsoft drinks, Chat, Chips, Chocolates,Coffee/Tea, Fruits/Fruit Juices, Ice-cream,Namkeen

    Chips & Finger Snack Industry Lays,Kukure,Haldirams, Bingo, Uncle Chips, Pringles,Lehar Namkeen

    Aided Snack Industry - Samosa, Cake, Chips,Biscuit, Puff/Sandwich, Pani-puri

    Chips & Finger Snack Industry Lays,Kukure,Haldirams

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    18/45

    LOGO

    Qualitative ResearchQualitative Research

    Interesting findings

    Group preferred sweet flavour and mild flavours tospicy flavours

    Beverages were also considered substitutes forsnack

    Do not like the Ad for Bingo!, as it does not say muchand is not funny too

    Do not remember flavours, but recall only packetcolours of Bingo!

    Do not know of the Bingo Chips, aware of MadAngles only

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    19/45

    LOGO In-Depth Interview -

    Snapshots

    In-Depth Interview -

    SnapshotsStudents 4

    Taste is an important criteria

    Variety of flavours

    Novelty Factor

    Packaging Variety in Size

    Preference for lower price products

    Snacks become substitutes for regular food dueto time constraint (lifestyle)

    High Peer Group Influence

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    20/45

    LOGO

    Interview SnapshotsInterview Snapshots

    Parents 3

    They mainly seem to buy for their kids

    Promotional offers like freebies

    Highly influenced by TV advertisements They seem to prefer products with bright packaging

    Consider this category of food as unhealthy andhence tend not to buy it regularly

    They feel that the flavours are a bit strong Children and Adults like to lick the packet after eating

    Bingo!

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    21/45

    LOGO

    Interview SnapshotsInterview Snapshots

    Working professionals 3

    Impulse-buy

    Hence availability is considered as important for

    them

    Promotional offers dont influence them greatly

    They dont buy frequently because they considerit to be unhealthy in the long run

    Tried the product Bingo after they heard about iton TV Ad

    Bingo is like Kurkure, spicy.. Thats it

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    22/45

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    23/45

    LOGO

    Data AnalysisData Analysis

    Consumer Profile

    Age

    Gender

    Income

    Occupation

    Marital Status

    City

    Access to Home food

    Frequency of snack consumption

    Health Consciousness

    Taste Preference

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    24/45

    LOGO

    Respondent ProfileRespondent Profile

    Student46%

    GovernmentEmployee

    7%

    Private Employee17%

    Self Employed15%

    Un Employed4%

    Home Maker11% Occupation

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    25/45

    LOGO

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Less health Concious

    Indifferent

    Very Health Concious

    Health Conciousness

    0

    0

    40

    60

    80

    100

    1 0

    Biscuitese

    h thips

    hocol tesFruits

    Ice-cre mN m een

    89

    6661

    96

    64 71

    68

    47

    105

    67

    34

    96

    8

    54 64 67

    Preference Av il bility

    Preference / Availability

    B se: 115

    B se: 115

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    26/45

    LOGO

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    0%50%

    Sweet Mild Flavours Spicy flavours

    Tastes

    Tastes

    Base: 115

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    27/45

    LOGO

    Brand AwarenessBrand Awareness

    Lays, 107

    Bingo, 33

    Haldirams,

    58

    Kurkure,49

    TOMA: 90 out of 115 respondents

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    28/45

    LOGO

    Reliability StatisticsReliability Statistics

    Cronbachs Alpha N ofItems

    0.706 9

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    29/45

    LOGO

    SWOT AnalysisSWOT Analysis

    Lays Bingo Haldirams Kurkure

    Has the taste I like 1.68 0.87 -1.06 -1.49

    Many flavours to choose from 3.20 -0.22 2.20 -5.19

    It is less oily -0.71 0.22 -2.58 3.07

    Has Indian flavours -0.28 -1.09 3.07 -1.71

    The packet contains less air -3.11 4.78 -2.36 0.68

    Readily available 1.24 -2.17 1.12 -0.19

    Promotional offers -2.02 0.65 -2.14 3.51

    End up licking my fingers when the packet is empty -2.45 2.83 2.64 -3.01

    Packaging 0.59 -1.09 -4.75 5.25

    Advertising campaigns 3.63 -1.52 -6.93 4.81

    Value for money -2.02 -3.70 7.42 -1.71

    Price -2.45 0.22 6.12 -3.88

    Available in various packet sizes 2.55 -2.61 -0.19 0.25

    It's roasted and not fried 0.16 2.83 -2.58 -0.40

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    30/45

    LOGO

    SWOT Analysis - BingoSWOT Analysis - Bingo

    Perceived as Lessoily snack as comparedto competitors

    Bingo Promotionaloffers can increase itssales

    Respondents ratedLays and Haldiramsclose with Bingo onTaste

    Close competition withall the competitors onIndian flavours

    Value for moneyPacket Sizes are notvaried

    Not readily available

    That the packet isperceived to containless air

    It is baked and not friedsnack

    Packet contents arelickable

    Strengths Weakness

    OpportunitiesThreats

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    31/45

    LOGO

    Jaccard AnalysisJaccard Analysis

    We have identified that varieties offered and availability of the product arethe category drivers for this particular industry.

    Attribute Overall

    Advertisement 0.362

    Availability 0.392

    Packaging 0.382

    Promotion 0.343

    Quality 0.328

    Taste 0.372

    Value 0.331

    Variety 0.410

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    32/45

    LOGO

    Regression AnalysisRegression Analysis

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    33/45

    LOGO

    Univariate AnalysisUnivariate Analysis

    Taste:

    Lays scores better with majoritybetween scores of 4 & 5, while Bingoborders on scores of 3 & 4. HenceLays is perceived to be of bettertaste.

    0

    51015202530

    1

    2

    34

    5

    Taste

    Lays

    Bingo

    Haldirams

    Kurkure

    0

    10

    2030

    401

    2

    34

    5

    Availability

    Lays

    Bingo

    Haldirams

    Kurkure

    Availability:

    Lays leads by a hugemargin, Bingo is strong with 30%

    rating it at 3 and 40% rating it at 4

    Base: 115

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    34/45

    LOGO

    Univariate AnalysisUnivariate Analysis

    Value:

    Haldirams & Lays are in closecompetition in this criteria

    0

    10

    20

    30

    401

    2

    34

    5

    Quality

    Lays

    Bingo

    Haldirams

    Kurkure

    0

    10

    2030

    401

    2

    34

    5

    Value

    Lays

    Bingo

    Haldirams

    Kurkure

    Quality:

    Lays leads here with Bingocoming up in second place.

    Base: 115

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    35/45

    LOGO Evaluating Bingos AD

    content

    Evaluating Bingos AD

    content

    Base: 101

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    36/45

    LOGO

    TV Ad44%

    Word of Mouth27%

    Display on shop29%

    First heard ofBingo from

    Base: 106

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    37/45

    LOGO

    Bivariate AnalysisBivariate Analysis

    Column1 All No Children for Children

    Promotion 57 20 37

    Advertisement 63 22 41

    Packaging 70 25 45

    Base: 115

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    38/45

    LOGO Age vs. Taste:

    B

    rand-wise

    Age vs. Taste:

    B

    rand-wise

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Lays Bingo Haldiram Kurkure

    25-40 years

    19-25 years

    >18 years

    Base: 65Base: 65 Base: 45 Base: 26

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    39/45

    LOGO Age vs. Quality:

    B

    rand-wise

    Age vs. Quality:

    B

    rand-wise

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Lays_Quality Bingo_Quality Haldiram_Quality Kurukure_Quality

    25-40 years

    19-25 years

    >18 years

    Base: 71 Base: 70 Base: 45 Base: 14

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    40/45

    LOGO Income vs. Value:

    B

    rand-wise

    Income vs. Value:

    B

    rand-wise

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Lays_Value Bingo_Value Haldiram_value Kurkure_Value

    > 6 lac

    4-6 lac

    2-4 lac

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    41/45

    LOGO Bingo Preference vs.

    Occupation

    Bingo Preference vs.

    Occupation

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    The packetcontains less air

    Value for money Price

    All

    Student

    Working Adult

    Base: 36 Base: 22Base: 31

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    42/45

    LOGO

    ConclusionConclusion

    The driving factors of the snack industry are:

    Variety

    Lays leads

    Even though Bingo has the most varieties (16), itstill lags behind Lays.

    This could be due to low awareness of thedifferent flavours of Bingo!

    Availability

    Lays & Haldirams are rated the highest

    Bingo lags behind in this aspect

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    43/45

    LOGO

    Conclusion.. Contd.Conclusion.. Contd.

    Competitive Advantage of Bingo!

    It is perceived to contain less air due to theshape and size of the wafer

    It is baked and not fried

    Bingo currently does not advertise its strength inthis area.

    People are more health conscious (58% ofrespondents)

    More product content could be added to itsadvertisements

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    44/45

    LOGO

    Conclusion.. Contd.Conclusion.. Contd.

    From in-depth interviews:

    Lot of people prefer to have crunchy and sweettype of snacks

    Bingo can explore this segment

    Bingo has not tried any promotional offers as away to attract consumers

    From the interviews, it was observed that it is agood way to reach kids through promotionaloffers

  • 8/7/2019 MM II - Group 1

    45/45