meredith’adams,’coordinator,’kf12’ instruc=on · pdf...

44
Robert Perry, Ed.D, APEIS Coordinator Division of Special Educa=on, Los Angeles Unified Meredith Adams, Coordinator, K12 Instruc=on Division of Special Educa=on, Los Angeles Unified

Upload: phungthuy

Post on 29-Mar-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Robert  Perry,  Ed.D,  APEIS  Coordinator  Division  of  Special  Educa=on,  Los  Angeles  Unified        

Meredith  Adams,  Coordinator,  K-­‐12  Instruc=on  Division  of  Special  Educa=on,  Los  Angeles  Unified        

General  Education  Population

87%

Special  Education  Population

13%

Total  District  Student  Popula=on  678,441  

 

Source: CASEMIS December 2001 and District Public Information Office, Norm Day 2010

Outcomes Met 14 Outcomes Unmet 4

Total 18

Outcome  1:      Par=cipa=on  in  Statewide                                  Assessments  

Outcome  6:      Least  Restric=ve  Environment  –                                          “Mild  to  Moderate  Disabili=es”    

Outcome  8:      Home  School  

Outcome  9:      Individual  Transi=on  Plans  

Outcome  10:  Timely  Evalua=ons  (and  IEPs)  

Outcome  3:      Gradua=on  Rate  

Outcome  5:      Reduc=on  of  Suspensions  

Outcome  12:      Informal  Dispute  Resolu=on  

Outcome  14:      Parent  Par=cipa=on    (in  the  IEP)    

Outcome  15:      Timely  Transla=ons  of  IEPs  

Outcome  16:      Qualified  Providers  

Outcome  17:      Behavioral  Interven=ons  

Outcome  11:  Complaint  Response  

Outcome  18:      Dispropor=onality  (Comprehensive            Assessment  of  African  American                        Students  Considered  for  Eligibility            of  Emo=onal  Disturbance)  

Outcome 2: Performance Statewide Assessments •  English Language Arts (27.5) •  Mathematics (30.2)

Outcome 4: Completion Rate

Outcome 7A: Least Restrictive Environment – “Moderate to Severe Disabilities”

Outcome 7B: Least Restrictive Environment – “Moderate to Severe Disabilities” Multiple Disabilities Orthopedic (MDO)

Outcome 13: Service Delivery

In  the  __  of  ___,  nothing  is  ____.    Some___  ___  life-­‐size  ___  out  of  tall  ___and  shrubs.    A  ____  careful    ____and  _____  can  ____  ____  paths.    ______  cut  and  shape  plants  into  _____,  larger-­‐than-­‐life  and  ____leafy  _____.    What  would  you  do  if  you  ______a  _____  full  of  these  ______?  _______  you  walk  right  in?  

In  the  world  of  ___,  nothing  is  ____.    Some___  create  life-­‐size  ___  out  of  tall  bushes  and  shrubs.    A  ____  careful    planning  and  clipping  can  ____  ____  paths.    ______  cut  and  shape  plants  into  _____,  larger-­‐than-­‐life  and  ____  leafy  _____.    What  would  you  do  if  you  ______a  _____  full  of  these  animals?  Would  you  walk  right  in?  

In  the  world  of  gardens,  nothing  is  ____.    Some  gardeners  create  life-­‐size  ___  out  of  tall  bushes  and  shrubs.    A  gardener’s  careful    planning  and  clipping  can  ____  strange  paths.    Others  cut  and  shape  plants  into  awesome,  larger-­‐than-­‐life  and  ____  leafy  _____.    What  would  you  do  if  you  discovered  a  garden  full  of  these  animals?  Would  you  walk  right  in?  

In  the  world  of  gardens,  nothing  is  impossible.    Some  gardeners  create  life-­‐size  mazes  out  of  tall  bushes  and  shrubs.    A  gardener’s  careful    planning  and  clipping  can  create  strange  paths.    Others  cut  and  shape  plants  into  awesome,  larger-­‐than-­‐life  and  incredible  leafy  animals.    What  would  you  do  if  you  discovered  a  garden  full  of  these  animals?  Would  you  walk  right  in?  

 “The  ques=on  is  not  “Is  it  possible  to  

educate  all  children  well?  But  rather,  Do  we  want  to  do  it  badly  enough?”  

Deborah  Meier  

Enter  RtI  and  RtI2  

l  We  can  effec(vely  teach  all  children  l  Intervene  early  l  Use  a  mul(-­‐(ered  model  of  service  delivery  

l  Use  a  problem  solving  method  to  make  decisions  within  a  mul(-­‐(ered  model  

   

l  Use  research-­‐based,  scien(fically  validated  interven(ons/instruc(on  to  the  extent  available  

l  Monitor  student  progress  to  inform  instruc(on  

l  Use  data  to  make  decisions  l  Use    assessment  for  1)  screening,  2)  diagnos(cs,  3)  progress  monitoring  

NASDSE,  2005  

l  High-­‐quality  instruc(on/interven(on  is  defined  as  instruc(on  or  interven(on,  matched  to  student  need,  that  has  been  demonstrated  through  scien(fic  research  and  prac(ce  to  produce  high  learning  rates  for  students  

l  Learning  rate  and  level  of  performance  are  primary  sources  of  informa(on  used  in  on-­‐going  decision-­‐making  

l  Important  educa(onal  decisions  about  intensity  and  likely  dura(on  of  interven(ons  are  based  on  individual  response  to  instruc(on  across  mul(ple  (ers  of  interven(on.  

NASDSE,  2005  

l  Evidence-­‐based  instruc(on  for  all  students  in  all  (ers  l  Differen(ated  instruc(on  at  all  (ers  l  Sufficient  academic  engaged  (me  (AET)  l  Time  for  prac(ce    l  Frequent,  psychometrically  sound  assessment  l  Real  (me  use  of  data  l  Best  use  of  technology    l  Parental  and  community  involvement    l  Professional  development  

Renaissance  Learning,  2009  

Star=ng  in  early  2003,  the  three-­‐=er  model  found  its  way  into  posi=on  papers,  reference  guides  and  professional  development.      

Implementa=on  of  the  RtI/RtI2  

� Strong  CORE  instruc=on  (grade  level)  

� Mul=  –  =ered  Approach  

�  Implementa=on  of  “Learning  Centers”  

� Use  of  accommoda=ons  (Assessment  and  Instruc=on)  

Implementa=on  of  the  RtI2  

�  5  Day  Training  –  SDP  teachers  for  access  to  core  instruc=on  (OCR)  

�  5  Day  Training  –  SDP  on  using  DIBELS  for  Benchmark  and  Progress    Monitoring  

�  2  Day  Training  for  RSP  Teachers  for  access  to  core  instruc=on  

�  2  Day  Training  for  RSP  Teachers  on  using  DIBELS  for  Benchmark  and  Progress    Monitoring  

�  Use  of  Voyager  Passport  as  Tier  2  interven=on  (IEP  students)  

Implementa=on  of  the  RtI2  

� 3  day  professional  development  for  Resource  Teachers  in  assessment,    instruc=on,  and  interven=on  

� Pilot  using  Tier  3  Core  Replacement  program:  READ180  

� Use  of  Voyager  VmathLive    

“Provide  leadership,  guidance,  and  support  to  the  school  community  in  order  to  maximize  learning    for  all  students  within  an  inclusive  environment  so  that  each  student  will  contribute  to  and  bene;it    from  our  diverse  society.”  

2003  

Par(es  agree  to  modify  the  Consent  Decree  to  improve  performance  of  SWDs  receiving  special  educa(on  services  

District  focuses  efforts  on  increasing  academic  performance  and  instruc(onal  effec(veness    for    SWDs  receiving  special  educa(on  services  

The  percentage  of  LAUSD  students  in  special  educa(on  scoring  basic  or  above  on  the  2008  CST  increases  to  25.1%,  (from  19.9  %  in  2006).  

The percentage of LAUSD students in special education scoring basic or above on the 2009 CST increases to 28.4%, exceeding the MCD’s ELA Outcome goal of 27.5%.

District  meets  14  of  18  Outcomes  in  the  MCD,  and  makes  significant  progress  toward  others,  but  remains  under  the  MCD.  

2004  

2006  

2008  

2009  

2010  

Targeted  interven(ons,  including  Voyager  Passport,  are  implemented    with  SWDs  receiving  special  educa(on  services  

LAUSD milestones since the Modified Consent Decree

Percent  of  Special  Educa=on  Students  Ranked  at  Basic  or  Above  on  the  California  Standards  Test  (CST)  

After effective, research-based intervention and strong district leadership, LAUSD surpassed the Consent Decree’s ELA Outcome, with 28.4% of students scoring Basic or above on the CST.

We  did  it  again  in  2010!  

29.5%  

LAUSD Students with SLD Scoring Basic and Above on 2008, 2009, and 2010 CST with Two Years of Intervention

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Core UA

+ Grade Level

5:1 PM

PM

3:1

Differentiation PM

�  DIBELS  (Dynamic  Indicators  of  Basic  Early  Literacy  Assessment)  •  Benchmark  Periods  �  BOY  –  Beginning  of  Year  � MOY-­‐  Middle  of  Year  �  EOY-­‐End  of  Year  

•  Individual  Measures/Goals  � NWF  –  Nonsense  Word  Fluency    �  BOY  –  50  SPM/WPM  (Reads  15  whole  words)  � ORF  –  Oral  Reading  Fluency  

�  BOY  –  44  WPM  � MOY  –  68  WPM  

� Using  the  informa=on  for  this  2nd  grade  class…  • How  would  you  group  the  children  for  Tier  1  instruc=on?  � Core?  � UA?  

• Which  students  need  more?  • What  could  “more”  look  like?  � Using  Richard’s  NWF  assessment  � What  skills  has  he  mastered?  � What  skills  will  need  more  instruc=on?  

 

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Core

UA

+ Grade Level

5:1 PM

PM

3:1

Differentiation PM

Resource Specialist

� Using  the  informa=on  for  this  2nd  grade  class…    � Using  Roberto’s  NWF  assessment  � What  skills  has  he  mastered?  � What  skills  will  need  more  instruc=on?  

 • Knowing  this  new  informa=on…  

• What  do  the  two  students  have  in  common?  

• What  does  the  instruc=on  look  like  for  Tier  1?  

• What  addi=onal  supports  may  be  needed?      

What  does  the  data  tell  you…  

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Core

III

+

Intensive Intervention Instruction

Grade Level

5:1 PM

PM

3:1

PM

The  greatest  danger  for  most  of  us  is  not  that  our  aim  is  too  high  and  we  miss  it,  but  that  it  is  too  low  and  we  

reach  it.    

Michelangelo    

h`p://www.nccrest.org/