measuring rock glacier surface deformation using sar ... · of the rock glacier and amounts to...

6
1 INTRODUCTION In a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) system, both the amplitude and the phase of the backscattered echoes are normally recorded. As the phase of a single SAR image is of no use however, conventionally only the amplitude or intensity image is usually provided to the end users. The phase difference of two backscattered SAR echoes of the same ground surface area taken at slightly different view angles can however be utilized to generate digital elevation model (DEM) of the imaged terrain (Prati et al. 1992, Zebker et al. 1994, Kenyi & Raggam 1996). This technique is known as SAR interferometry (InSAR) and can be extended to differential SAR interferometry (D-InSAR) to detect small surface changes in the order of few centimeters (Gabriel et al. 1989). Although the D-InSAR method has been shown to successfully detect surface displace- ment in the radar line-of-sight caused by earthquakes (Massonet et al. 1993), or mass movements in the alpine and arctic terrain (Rott & Siegel 1999, Wang & Li 1999), additional investigations in high mountain environments have yet to be performed. A number of questions related to the properties of rock glaciers, which are creep phenomena of discon- tinuous mountain permafrost (Barsch 1996), and the imaging geometry of the SAR sensor remain to be answered. These include (1) the relatively small sizes of alpine rock glaciers in comparison to the SAR pixel resolution, (2) the rough surface topography composed of debris and rocks, (3) the perennial snow patches and snow cover in the areas of interest, (4) the rather small flow velocities of active rock glaciers in the range of centimetres to a few metres per annum, (5) the look angle of the SAR sensor, and (6) the geomet- ric and temporal baselines requirements for success- ful D-InSAR data sets. In this paper, the detection and quantification of surface deformation of an actively creeping, alpine rock glaciers using InSAR data is reported. Additionally, the prerequisites to perform such an analysis in the alpine region are given. A comparison of the D-InSAR results with available geodetic and photogrammetric measurements is presented. In Section 2, the principles of D-InSAR are described in detail and in Section 3 the description of the test area, the compiled SAR data, and the interferometric processing procedure are presented. Discussion and the quantitative analysis of the achieved results are presented in Section 4. The conclusions and the scope for future work are given in Section 5. 2 PRINCIPLES OF D-INSAR The difference of two interferograms can be used to measure small surface changes over large areas at a scale in the order of centimetres (Gabriel et al. 1989). The interferometric phase is sensitive to both surface topography and coherent displacement along the SAR look vector occurring between the acquisition of the interferometric image pair. The basic idea in the differential technique is to remove the topography related phase whilst the remaining phase provides the displacement. In practice however, noise and path pro- pagation related phases have to be taken into consid- eration. Details of the D-InSAR technique can be found in the literature (Gabriel et al. 1989, Massonet et al. 1993, and Zebker et al. 1994). The phase f measured by a repeat orbit InSAR sys- tem can be expressed as in Equation 1 (see Zebker et al. 1994): (1) where r is the difference in range and includes com- ponents other than that contributed by the topography. f p l 4 r 537 Measuring rock glacier surface deformation using SAR interferometry L.W. Kenyi Institute for Digital Image Processing, Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria V. Kaufmann Institute of Geodesy, Graz University of Technology, Austria ABSTRACT: The detection and quantification of surface deformation of an active rock glacier using the differ- ential SAR interferometry technique is presented. An average deformation rate of 6 mm/35 days in the radar line-of-sight in the summer of 1992 was estimated. The maximum deformation rate was located at the upper part of the rock glacier and amounts to 18 mm/35 days. In contrast, at the snout of the rock glacier the deformation rate was only around 10 mm/35 days. The spatial distribution of the surface deformation in the D-InSAR dis- placement map is smooth and supports the idea that ice is the stress transferring medium in rock glaciers. Permafrost, Phillips, Springman & Arenson (eds) © 2003 Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, ISBN 90 5809 582 7

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Measuring rock glacier surface deformation using SAR ... · of the rock glacier and amounts to 18mm/35 days. In contrast, at the snout of the rock glacier the deformation rate was

1 INTRODUCTION

In a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) system, both theamplitude and the phase of the backscattered echoesare normally recorded. As the phase of a single SARimage is of no use however, conventionally only theamplitude or intensity image is usually provided to theend users. The phase difference of two backscatteredSAR echoes of the same ground surface area taken atslightly different view angles can however be utilizedto generate digital elevation model (DEM) of theimaged terrain (Prati et al. 1992, Zebker et al. 1994,Kenyi & Raggam 1996). This technique is known asSAR interferometry (InSAR) and can be extended todifferential SAR interferometry (D-InSAR) to detectsmall surface changes in the order of few centimeters(Gabriel et al. 1989). Although the D-InSAR methodhas been shown to successfully detect surface displace-ment in the radar line-of-sight caused by earthquakes(Massonet et al. 1993), or mass movements in thealpine and arctic terrain (Rott & Siegel 1999, Wang &Li 1999), additional investigations in high mountainenvironments have yet to be performed.

A number of questions related to the properties ofrock glaciers, which are creep phenomena of discon-tinuous mountain permafrost (Barsch 1996), and theimaging geometry of the SAR sensor remain to beanswered. These include (1) the relatively small sizesof alpine rock glaciers in comparison to the SAR pixelresolution, (2) the rough surface topography composedof debris and rocks, (3) the perennial snow patchesand snow cover in the areas of interest, (4) the rathersmall flow velocities of active rock glaciers in therange of centimetres to a few metres per annum, (5)the look angle of the SAR sensor, and (6) the geomet-ric and temporal baselines requirements for success-ful D-InSAR data sets.

In this paper, the detection and quantification ofsurface deformation of an actively creeping, alpine rock

glaciers using InSAR data is reported. Additionally,the prerequisites to perform such an analysis in thealpine region are given. A comparison of the D-InSARresults with available geodetic and photogrammetricmeasurements is presented.

In Section 2, the principles of D-InSAR are describedin detail and in Section 3 the description of the testarea, the compiled SAR data, and the interferometricprocessing procedure are presented. Discussion andthe quantitative analysis of the achieved results arepresented in Section 4. The conclusions and the scopefor future work are given in Section 5.

2 PRINCIPLES OF D-INSAR

The difference of two interferograms can be used tomeasure small surface changes over large areas at ascale in the order of centimetres (Gabriel et al. 1989).The interferometric phase is sensitive to both surfacetopography and coherent displacement along the SARlook vector occurring between the acquisition of the interferometric image pair. The basic idea in thedifferential technique is to remove the topographyrelated phase whilst the remaining phase provides thedisplacement. In practice however, noise and path pro-pagation related phases have to be taken into consid-eration. Details of the D-InSAR technique can be foundin the literature (Gabriel et al. 1989, Massonet et al.1993, and Zebker et al. 1994).

The phase f measured by a repeat orbit InSAR sys-tem can be expressed as in Equation 1 (see Zebker et al. 1994):

(1)

where �r is the difference in range and includes com-ponents other than that contributed by the topography.

fp

l �

4r

537

Measuring rock glacier surface deformation using SAR interferometry

L.W. KenyiInstitute for Digital Image Processing, Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria

V. KaufmannInstitute of Geodesy, Graz University of Technology, Austria

ABSTRACT: The detection and quantification of surface deformation of an active rock glacier using the differ-ential SAR interferometry technique is presented. An average deformation rate of �6 mm/35 days in the radarline-of-sight in the summer of 1992 was estimated. The maximum deformation rate was located at the upper partof the rock glacier and amounts to �18 mm/35 days. In contrast, at the snout of the rock glacier the deformationrate was only around �10 mm/35 days. The spatial distribution of the surface deformation in the D-InSAR dis-placement map is smooth and supports the idea that ice is the stress transferring medium in rock glaciers.

Permafrost, Phillips, Springman & Arenson (eds)© 2003 Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, ISBN 90 5809 582 7

Page 2: Measuring rock glacier surface deformation using SAR ... · of the rock glacier and amounts to 18mm/35 days. In contrast, at the snout of the rock glacier the deformation rate was

These components are summarised in Equation 2 (seeWegmueller & Strozzi 1998):

(2)

Equation 2 implies that to obtain the displacementphase, we need to estimate the other phase contribu-tions. The phase due to noise comprises three compo-nents, thermal noise and baseline and temporaldecorrelation. Thermal noise can be rejected becausethe signal-to-noise ratio of the ERS sensor in this caseis designed to be maximum. Baseline decorrelationcan be reduced by spectral shift filtering if the normalbaseline component is greater than the ERS optimalvalue (200 m). Temporal decorrelation is inherent andcan be minimized by selection of image pairs ofsmaller temporal baselines. Other factors which mustbe taken into account are the phase due to processingerrors, atmospheric displacement and the topographi-cal phase. The phase due to processing errors isimportant but can also be considered as noise in thedata. Similarly, the atmospheric displacement can beignored in this case as the area of investigation issmaller than the spatial scale of the tropospheric vari-ation. The most influential factor is the phase due totopography, which can either be estimated from aDEM or from another interferogram of a relativelylarge normal baseline component. The remaining phaseafter the removal of the unwanted phase componentscan be considered as a consequence of displacementand is expressed as in Equation 3, (see Zebker et al.1994):

(3)

For the ERS SAR sensor, a one cycle phase shift willimply a displacement of 28.3 mm in the SAR slantrange direction.

3 DATA AND PROCESSING

3.1 Test area and data compilation

The Doesen rock glacier is located in the inner DoesenValley within the Austrian Hohe Tauern National Parkin the province of Carinthia. Its geographic coordi-nates are approximately 46°59�N and 13°17�E. It isone of two permafrost study test sites in Austria underdetailed investigation using a number of differentmethods (see also Rott & Siegel 1999).

The glacially shaped, west-east oriented inner DoesenValley covers an area of about 3 km2 and stretchesfrom 2200 m to 3086 m above sea level, (Figure 1b).

It consists of crystalline rocks, predominantly graniticgneiss, and is characterised by diversified glacial andpre-glacial morphology containing various talus fea-tures, the majority formed by permafrost processes.The centre of the study area is occupied by the activeDoesen rock glacier (length 900 m, area 0.4 km2). Themean annual air temperature is �2°C at 2550 m andthe annual precipitation amounts to about 2000 mm atthe same altitude, thus enabling areas with and with-out permafrost to be studied. Most of the area is freeof compact vegetation cover. Under the bouldery sur-face at the foot of the north-facing slopes, includingDoesen rock glacier, permafrost extends down toapproximately 2270 m (snout of Doesen rock glacierat 2350 m). According to geophysical soundings (seis-mic, electromagnetic and ground-penetrating radarmeasurements), the mean thickness of the rock glacieris likely to be in the range of 30–40 m. The total vol-ume of the rock glacier is estimated at 15 106m3.Detailed information on high-mountain permafrost inthe Austrian Alps and on the Doesen rock glacier inparticular can be found in Lieb (1998). Since 1995geodetic and photogrammetric measurements havebeen carried out at the Doesen rock glacier to studythe spatial and temporal variations of the rock glaciersurface. A maximum mean horizontal flow velocity ofabout 30 cm/annum was measured in the lower centralpart of the Doesen rock glacier (Kaufmann 1998).

For the InSAR data, five ERS-1/2 SAR single lookcomplex (SLC) image data sets acquired during theperiod 1992 to 1997 over the Hohe Tauern range werecompiled. In the selection of the data sets the weatherconditions around the time of acquisition were takeninto account to minimize atmospheric effects. Thegeodetic field campaigns and aerial photographs (seeFigure 1b) have shown the Doesen rock glacier to bealmost snow free during the period August–September,except for some minor areas with perennial snowpatches. The selection of the interferometric imagepairs was thus concentrated on this season of the year.

fp

lrdisplacement

4

f f f f

f f

� �� �

terrain displacement atmosphere

noise processing

538

Figure 1. (a) ERS SAR sub amplitude image of the testarea and (b) aerial photo perspective view from West direc-tion of the area of interest. It is evident that the terrain isrugged and the relief energy is very high.

Page 3: Measuring rock glacier surface deformation using SAR ... · of the rock glacier and amounts to 18mm/35 days. In contrast, at the snout of the rock glacier the deformation rate was

The orbit numbers of the selected scenes are listed inTable 1.

3.2 Data processing

For the generation of any D-InSAR products the clas-sical interferometric processing chain must first beapplied to the SLC image data. This involves: (1) thedetermination of shifts between the master image andthe other slave images, (2) the resampling of the slaveimages to the raster geometry of the master image and(3) generation of the multi-looked InSAR products.We applied our own, in house developed, InSAR tools.The detailed description of the procedures can befound in Kenyi et al. (1996). After the co-registration,interferometric products from all possible combina-tions of the data sets listed in Table 1 were generated.The InSAR multi-looking was chosen as 5 looks andcorresponds to about 20 20 m2 ground pixel spac-ing. This is sufficient to allow the detection of thesmall scale Doesen rock glacier. The orbit combina-tions 06279-05778 and 12000-31673 showed the bestcoherence. The normal baseline component of the12000-31673 orbit pair combination was very largehowever, at about 376 m, and the topographic phasewas dominant. The normal baseline component of the 06279-05778 was only 7 m, which is perfect forD-InSAR application purposes.

Since one of the interferograms has an almost zeronormal baseline component (7 m), its flat terrain fil-tered interferogram could be directly interpreted asthe displacement phase. The test area however is char-acterised by very high relief and a rugged terrain.Even though the normal baseline component is verysmall, the relief effect is still present in the flattenedinterferogram. This point was checked by comparingthe flattened interferogram with the simulated wrappedinterferogram as shown in Figure 3. It was decided toapply the 2-pass D-InSAR (Wegmueller & Strozzi1998) approach because of the availability of an accu-rate DEM of the test area. The estimation of the topo-graphic phase from the ERS tandem orbit pair12000-13673 was avoided mainly because of unwrap-ping errors due to the rugged terrain (layover andshadow areas) (Wegmueller & Strozzi 1998).

3.3 Simulation of interferogram

Using the InSAR geometric imaging disposition vari-ous approaches may be used to convert the unwrappedInSAR measured interferogram to the correspondingground points on a pixel-by-pixel basis. A procedure forconverting the unwrapped InSAR phase image to heightvalues in a specific map projection system is describedin Kenyi & Raggam (1996). This tool was modified tosimulate interferograms in slant range geometry froma DEM in specific map projection (Figure 2).

The simulation interferogram was co-registered tothat measured by InSAR to within pixel accuracy.Figure 3 shows a comparison of the ERS measured andsimulated wrapped interferograms. The unwrapped (orabsolute value) simulated interferogram was then usedto remove the topographic component from the inter-ferogram of the orbit pair 06279-05778. The removalwas carried out in the complex domain by conjugatingthe simulated interferogram and multiplying it withthat measured by InSAR. The residual interferogramis the D-InSAR product shown in Figure 4a. The D-InSAR interferogram was then smoothed to reduce

539

Table 1. Compiled ERS-1/2 data sets.

Orbit number Acquisition date Product type

05778 ERS-1 23.08.1992 SLCI*06279 ERS-1 27.09.1992 SLCI21152 ERS-1 01.08.1995 SLCI31673 ERS-1 05.08.1997 SLCI12000 ERS-2 06.08.1997 SLCI

* SLCI stands for single look complex ERS SAR full scene product.

Figure 2. (a) The DEM used for the topographic phasesimulation. (b) The simulated interferogram using imagingparameters of ERS-1 orbits 05578 and 06279. Only thewrapped version is presented here. For subtraction theabsolute simulated interferogram was used.

Figure 3. Comparison of the InSAR measured and simu-lated interferograms. (a) ERS InSAR measured and (b) DEM simulated. The interferometric multi-looking is 5 looks for both interferograms.

Page 4: Measuring rock glacier surface deformation using SAR ... · of the rock glacier and amounts to 18mm/35 days. In contrast, at the snout of the rock glacier the deformation rate was

speckle using spectral filtering (Goldstein & Werner1998). The speckle filtered interferogram was phaseunwrapped using the branch-cut method of Goldsteinet al. (1988). The resulting unwrapped interferogramwas then scaled to cm level to produce the radar line-of-sight displacement map shown in Figure 4b.

4 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

The quantitative analysis is based on the Doesen rockglacier area delineated in the box of Figure 4. Theerror in the analysis was estimated from the residualsin the non-moving areas at about �1.4 mm rms. Thefinal result is shown in Figure 5a and presented as adisplacement map with contour line intervals of 1.0 mmin ground range geometry. The areas with statisticallyinsignificant displacements are coded gray, e.g. 2 timesrms. For the other image pair combinations, coherencyin the area where the rock glacier is located was toolow for successful processing.

The image in Figure 5a clearly reveals the spatialdistribution of the surface deformation of the rockglacier in the radar line-of-sight. The processesinvolved in the dynamics of rock glaciers are generalmass advection, advection of topography by creep, 3-dimensional straining and local mass changes dueto ice melt or refreezing (Kääb et al. 2003). For flowvelocity measurement tracking is required. Thus, theflow velocity of rock glaciers cannot be deduced fromD-InSAR displacement maps without preliminaryassumptions of the various processes involved.

The maximum deformation (point A in Figure 5a)measured in the D-InSAR map was about �18 mm/35 days and the changes at the snout of the rock gla-cier (point S in Figure 5a) amounted to �10 mm/35days. The overall mean deformation rate was about�6 mm/35 days. The quantitative validation of theseresults with annual geodetic measurements and multi-year photogrammetric investigations (e.g. Kaufmann1998) is not adequate, since the data were not taken at

the same period and the measurements are not directlycomparable.

The spatial distribution of the surface deformationis smooth however, which is also true for the pho-togrammetrically derived lines of equal horizontal flowvelocity (Figure 5a with 5b). The obtained D-InSARmeasurements, such as the observed surface deforma-tion, must be attributed mainly to the vertical surfacechange as a result of the various processes mentionedabove. Currently the dynamics of rock glaciers are notwell understood. For this reason the InternationalPermafrost Association (IPA) has setup a task force onPermafrost Creep and Rock Glacier Dynamics. Theaim of this task force is to define the current level ofknowledge with respect to the potential for numeri-cally modelling the flow and evolution of perenniallyfrozen ice/rock-mixtures.

In order to extract physically meaningful informa-tion from the D-InSAR measured surface deforma-tion that could be attributed to specific processes, acomplementary orbit would be useful. In an alpineenvironment however, the orientation of the rock gla-cier in respect to the radar line of sight does matter. In a best case scenario the rock glacier must belocated in a back slope and the flow direction must beparallel to the radar line-of-sight, with only ascendingor descending orbits being used.

5 CONCLUSIONS

The detection and measurement of surface deforma-tion of a small active rock glacier using ERS D-InSAR

540

Figure 4. Difference interferogram generated by subtrac-tion of topographic phase simulated from DEM and InSARinterferogram from ERS-1 orbit pair 06279-05778. Inter-ferogram in (a) wrapped and (b) unwrapped and scaled.

S

A

no velocity data outside polygon

0 m 100 m 200 m

(b)

(a)

Figure 5. (a) Close-up of the area marked with a box inFigure 4b in isolines of 1 mm displacements for ERS cycleof 35 days with non-moving parts in gray. (b) Isolines of1 cm of photogrammetrically derived mean annual horizon-tal flow velocity for the time period 1975–1993.

Page 5: Measuring rock glacier surface deformation using SAR ... · of the rock glacier and amounts to 18mm/35 days. In contrast, at the snout of the rock glacier the deformation rate was

data has been successfully demonstrated. The meandeformation rate of the rock glacier surface (in theradar line-of-sight) was estimated to be about �6 mm/35 days. Because the deformation is complex andresults from general mass advection, advection oftopography by creep, 3-dimensional straining and localmass changes due to ice melt or refreezing, it is difficultto assign the D-InSAR results to specific components.

For a successful detection and quantification ofrock glacier deformation in the Alps, InSAR data withvery small normal baseline components and a multi-looking of 5 looks are required. The glacier must belocated on a back slope (otherwise it will be a layover)and the flow must be in the SAR line-of-sight. Thetemporal baseline must be very short, and the periodof August to September is the optimum time forInSAR data acquisition as at this time of the year themajority of the rock glacier is snow free. If this is notthe case then the data will be temporally decorrelated.

As a result of the successful launch of ENVISATand the upcoming spaceborne SAR missions, SARdata will be increasingly available during the comingdecades. The proposed application of SAR interfer-ometry for the world wide monitoring of rock glacierscan be further investigated and perhaps developed to afully operational level.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The data used were provided by ESA as part of theERS Tandem AO project no. AOT.A301. The financialsupport of the Hohe Tauern National Park is kindlyappreciated.

REFERENCES

Barsch, D. 1996. Rock glaciers: indicators for the presentand formaer Geoecology in high mountain environ-ment. Springer Series in Physical Environment 16: 331.

Gabriel, A.K., Goldstein, R.M. & Zebker, H.A. 1989. Map-ping small elevation changes over large areas: Differ-ential radar interferometry. J. of Geophysical Research94(B7): 9183–9191.

Goldstein, R.M., Zebker, H.A. & Werner, C.L. 1988. Satelliteradar interferometry: Two-dimensional phase unwrap-ping. Radio Science 23(4): 713–720.

Goldstein, R.M. & Werner, C.L. 1998. Radar interferogramfiltering for geophysical applications. GeophysicalResearch Letters 25(21): 4035–4038.

Kääb, A., Kaufmann, V. & Eiken, T. 2003. Rock glacierdynamics: implications from high-resolution meas-urements of surface velocity fields. Proceedings of the8th International Conference on Permafrost, Zurich,Switzerland (this volume).

Kaufmann, V. 1998. Deformation analysis of the Doesen rock glacier (Austria). Proceedings of the 7thInternational Permafrost Conference, Yellowknife,Canada, Collection Nordicana 57: 551–556.

Kenyi, L.W. & Raggam, H. 1996. Accuracy Assessment ofInterferometrically Derived DTMs. Proceedings ofESA FRINGE’96 Workshop on ERS SAR Interfer-ometry, 30 September–2 October, Zurich, Switzerland:51–56.

Kenyi, L.W., Raggam, H. & Schardt, M. 1996. SAR Inter-ferometry: Experiences with ERS-1/2 SLC Data. TheAustrian Journal of Survey & Geoinformation, VGI,special edition for the XVIIIth ISPRS-Congress 9–19July, Vienna, Austria 2(96): 157–164.

Lieb, G.K. 1998. High-mountain permafrost in the AustrianAlps (Europe). Proceedings of the 7th InternationalPermafrost Conference, Yellowknife, Canada, Collec-tion Nordicana 57: 663–668.

Massonet, D., Rossi, M., Carmona, C., Adragna, F., Peltzer, G., Feigl, K. & Rabaute, T. 1993. The dis-placement field of Landers earthquake mapped byradar interferometry. Nature 364: 138–142.

Prati, C., Rocca, F. & Monti-Guarnieri, A. 1992. SAR inter-ferometry experiments with ERS-1. Proceedings of1st ERS-1 Symposium, Cannes, France: 211–218.

Rott, H. & Siegel, A. 1999. Analysis of mass movements inalpine terrain by means of SAR interferometry.Proceedings of IGARSS’99, 28 June–2 July, Hamburg,Germany: 1933–1936.

Wang, Z. & Li, S. 1999. Detection of winter frost heavingof the active layer of Arctic permafrost using SAR dif-ferential interferograms. Proceedings of IGARSS’99,28 June–2 July, Hamburg, Germany: 1946–1948.

Wegmueller, U. & Strozzi, T. 1998. Characterization of dif-ferential interferometry approaches. Proceedings ofEUSAR’98, 25–27 May, Friedrichshafen, Germany:237–240.

Zebker, H., Werner, C., Rosen, P. & Hensley, S. 1994.Accuracy of topographic maps derived from ERS-1interferometric radar. IEEE Transaction on Geoscienceand Remote Sensing 32(4): 823–836.

541

Page 6: Measuring rock glacier surface deformation using SAR ... · of the rock glacier and amounts to 18mm/35 days. In contrast, at the snout of the rock glacier the deformation rate was