mary jenkins - cincinnati bar association solo presentation 04232014.pdfmary jenkins law librarian...

28
Mary Jenkins Law Librarian & Director Cincinnati Bar Association Solo / Small Firm Practitioners Committee April 23, 2014

Upload: lytram

Post on 28-Mar-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

Cincinnati Bar Association

Solo Small Firm Practitioners Committee April 23 2014

Adventures in Social Media Discovery

or No Fishing

The Venn Diagram of Social Media posted 8282009 by Steven Leckart

Top 10 Things You Should Not Share on Social Networks

1 Anything You Dont Want Shared 2 Password Hints 3 Your Password 4 Personal Finance Information 5 Your Address and Phone Number 6 Photos of Your Kids 7 Company Information 8 Linking Sites 9 Social Plans 10 Personal Conversations howstuffworkscom

In a nutshell

ldquoCourts across the United States have now made clear that discovery of social media is fair game At the same time courts have consistently found that litigants will not be permitted to engage in social media fishing expeditions rather litigants will be required to show that the sites likely contain relevant materialrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Under Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ldquothe scope of discovery is as follows Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any partyrsquos claim or defense rdquo Fed R Civ P 26(b)(1) ldquoRelevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidencerdquo Id

However Rule 26(b) does require a ldquothreshold showing that the requested information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence Otherwise the [party] would be allowed to engage in the proverbial fishing expedition in the hope that there might be something of relevancerdquo in the information sought Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 388 (ED Mich 2012)

Kennedy v Contract Pharmacal Corp CV 12-2664 (JFB) (ETB) United States District Court Eastern District Of NY

Court agreed that ldquohellipthe interrogatories are narrative in nature and should be covered by a deposition and on the ground that the interrogatories exceed twenty-fivehelliprdquo ldquoThe objections are sustained There is no specificity to the requests and no effort to limit these requests to any relevant acts alleged in this action Lacking relevance and specificity the requests are vague overly broad and unduly burdensomerdquo

Angela Ford et al v United States Civil Action No DKC 11-3039 US District Court for the District of Maryland

Court rejected the governmentrsquos request for broad social media-related discovery The government had sought ldquoany documents[] postings pictures messages[] or entries of any kind on social media within the covered period relating to [c]laims by Plaintiffs or their [e]xpertsrdquo The court denied the motion to compel holding that the governmentrsquos request was not narrowly tailored and ldquodoes not describe the categories of material sought rather it relies on Plaintiffs to determine what might be relevantrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 2: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Adventures in Social Media Discovery

or No Fishing

The Venn Diagram of Social Media posted 8282009 by Steven Leckart

Top 10 Things You Should Not Share on Social Networks

1 Anything You Dont Want Shared 2 Password Hints 3 Your Password 4 Personal Finance Information 5 Your Address and Phone Number 6 Photos of Your Kids 7 Company Information 8 Linking Sites 9 Social Plans 10 Personal Conversations howstuffworkscom

In a nutshell

ldquoCourts across the United States have now made clear that discovery of social media is fair game At the same time courts have consistently found that litigants will not be permitted to engage in social media fishing expeditions rather litigants will be required to show that the sites likely contain relevant materialrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Under Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ldquothe scope of discovery is as follows Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any partyrsquos claim or defense rdquo Fed R Civ P 26(b)(1) ldquoRelevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidencerdquo Id

However Rule 26(b) does require a ldquothreshold showing that the requested information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence Otherwise the [party] would be allowed to engage in the proverbial fishing expedition in the hope that there might be something of relevancerdquo in the information sought Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 388 (ED Mich 2012)

Kennedy v Contract Pharmacal Corp CV 12-2664 (JFB) (ETB) United States District Court Eastern District Of NY

Court agreed that ldquohellipthe interrogatories are narrative in nature and should be covered by a deposition and on the ground that the interrogatories exceed twenty-fivehelliprdquo ldquoThe objections are sustained There is no specificity to the requests and no effort to limit these requests to any relevant acts alleged in this action Lacking relevance and specificity the requests are vague overly broad and unduly burdensomerdquo

Angela Ford et al v United States Civil Action No DKC 11-3039 US District Court for the District of Maryland

Court rejected the governmentrsquos request for broad social media-related discovery The government had sought ldquoany documents[] postings pictures messages[] or entries of any kind on social media within the covered period relating to [c]laims by Plaintiffs or their [e]xpertsrdquo The court denied the motion to compel holding that the governmentrsquos request was not narrowly tailored and ldquodoes not describe the categories of material sought rather it relies on Plaintiffs to determine what might be relevantrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 3: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

The Venn Diagram of Social Media posted 8282009 by Steven Leckart

Top 10 Things You Should Not Share on Social Networks

1 Anything You Dont Want Shared 2 Password Hints 3 Your Password 4 Personal Finance Information 5 Your Address and Phone Number 6 Photos of Your Kids 7 Company Information 8 Linking Sites 9 Social Plans 10 Personal Conversations howstuffworkscom

In a nutshell

ldquoCourts across the United States have now made clear that discovery of social media is fair game At the same time courts have consistently found that litigants will not be permitted to engage in social media fishing expeditions rather litigants will be required to show that the sites likely contain relevant materialrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Under Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ldquothe scope of discovery is as follows Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any partyrsquos claim or defense rdquo Fed R Civ P 26(b)(1) ldquoRelevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidencerdquo Id

However Rule 26(b) does require a ldquothreshold showing that the requested information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence Otherwise the [party] would be allowed to engage in the proverbial fishing expedition in the hope that there might be something of relevancerdquo in the information sought Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 388 (ED Mich 2012)

Kennedy v Contract Pharmacal Corp CV 12-2664 (JFB) (ETB) United States District Court Eastern District Of NY

Court agreed that ldquohellipthe interrogatories are narrative in nature and should be covered by a deposition and on the ground that the interrogatories exceed twenty-fivehelliprdquo ldquoThe objections are sustained There is no specificity to the requests and no effort to limit these requests to any relevant acts alleged in this action Lacking relevance and specificity the requests are vague overly broad and unduly burdensomerdquo

Angela Ford et al v United States Civil Action No DKC 11-3039 US District Court for the District of Maryland

Court rejected the governmentrsquos request for broad social media-related discovery The government had sought ldquoany documents[] postings pictures messages[] or entries of any kind on social media within the covered period relating to [c]laims by Plaintiffs or their [e]xpertsrdquo The court denied the motion to compel holding that the governmentrsquos request was not narrowly tailored and ldquodoes not describe the categories of material sought rather it relies on Plaintiffs to determine what might be relevantrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 4: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Top 10 Things You Should Not Share on Social Networks

1 Anything You Dont Want Shared 2 Password Hints 3 Your Password 4 Personal Finance Information 5 Your Address and Phone Number 6 Photos of Your Kids 7 Company Information 8 Linking Sites 9 Social Plans 10 Personal Conversations howstuffworkscom

In a nutshell

ldquoCourts across the United States have now made clear that discovery of social media is fair game At the same time courts have consistently found that litigants will not be permitted to engage in social media fishing expeditions rather litigants will be required to show that the sites likely contain relevant materialrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Under Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ldquothe scope of discovery is as follows Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any partyrsquos claim or defense rdquo Fed R Civ P 26(b)(1) ldquoRelevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidencerdquo Id

However Rule 26(b) does require a ldquothreshold showing that the requested information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence Otherwise the [party] would be allowed to engage in the proverbial fishing expedition in the hope that there might be something of relevancerdquo in the information sought Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 388 (ED Mich 2012)

Kennedy v Contract Pharmacal Corp CV 12-2664 (JFB) (ETB) United States District Court Eastern District Of NY

Court agreed that ldquohellipthe interrogatories are narrative in nature and should be covered by a deposition and on the ground that the interrogatories exceed twenty-fivehelliprdquo ldquoThe objections are sustained There is no specificity to the requests and no effort to limit these requests to any relevant acts alleged in this action Lacking relevance and specificity the requests are vague overly broad and unduly burdensomerdquo

Angela Ford et al v United States Civil Action No DKC 11-3039 US District Court for the District of Maryland

Court rejected the governmentrsquos request for broad social media-related discovery The government had sought ldquoany documents[] postings pictures messages[] or entries of any kind on social media within the covered period relating to [c]laims by Plaintiffs or their [e]xpertsrdquo The court denied the motion to compel holding that the governmentrsquos request was not narrowly tailored and ldquodoes not describe the categories of material sought rather it relies on Plaintiffs to determine what might be relevantrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 5: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

In a nutshell

ldquoCourts across the United States have now made clear that discovery of social media is fair game At the same time courts have consistently found that litigants will not be permitted to engage in social media fishing expeditions rather litigants will be required to show that the sites likely contain relevant materialrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Under Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ldquothe scope of discovery is as follows Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any partyrsquos claim or defense rdquo Fed R Civ P 26(b)(1) ldquoRelevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidencerdquo Id

However Rule 26(b) does require a ldquothreshold showing that the requested information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence Otherwise the [party] would be allowed to engage in the proverbial fishing expedition in the hope that there might be something of relevancerdquo in the information sought Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 388 (ED Mich 2012)

Kennedy v Contract Pharmacal Corp CV 12-2664 (JFB) (ETB) United States District Court Eastern District Of NY

Court agreed that ldquohellipthe interrogatories are narrative in nature and should be covered by a deposition and on the ground that the interrogatories exceed twenty-fivehelliprdquo ldquoThe objections are sustained There is no specificity to the requests and no effort to limit these requests to any relevant acts alleged in this action Lacking relevance and specificity the requests are vague overly broad and unduly burdensomerdquo

Angela Ford et al v United States Civil Action No DKC 11-3039 US District Court for the District of Maryland

Court rejected the governmentrsquos request for broad social media-related discovery The government had sought ldquoany documents[] postings pictures messages[] or entries of any kind on social media within the covered period relating to [c]laims by Plaintiffs or their [e]xpertsrdquo The court denied the motion to compel holding that the governmentrsquos request was not narrowly tailored and ldquodoes not describe the categories of material sought rather it relies on Plaintiffs to determine what might be relevantrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 6: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Under Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ldquothe scope of discovery is as follows Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any partyrsquos claim or defense rdquo Fed R Civ P 26(b)(1) ldquoRelevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidencerdquo Id

However Rule 26(b) does require a ldquothreshold showing that the requested information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence Otherwise the [party] would be allowed to engage in the proverbial fishing expedition in the hope that there might be something of relevancerdquo in the information sought Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 388 (ED Mich 2012)

Kennedy v Contract Pharmacal Corp CV 12-2664 (JFB) (ETB) United States District Court Eastern District Of NY

Court agreed that ldquohellipthe interrogatories are narrative in nature and should be covered by a deposition and on the ground that the interrogatories exceed twenty-fivehelliprdquo ldquoThe objections are sustained There is no specificity to the requests and no effort to limit these requests to any relevant acts alleged in this action Lacking relevance and specificity the requests are vague overly broad and unduly burdensomerdquo

Angela Ford et al v United States Civil Action No DKC 11-3039 US District Court for the District of Maryland

Court rejected the governmentrsquos request for broad social media-related discovery The government had sought ldquoany documents[] postings pictures messages[] or entries of any kind on social media within the covered period relating to [c]laims by Plaintiffs or their [e]xpertsrdquo The court denied the motion to compel holding that the governmentrsquos request was not narrowly tailored and ldquodoes not describe the categories of material sought rather it relies on Plaintiffs to determine what might be relevantrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 7: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

However Rule 26(b) does require a ldquothreshold showing that the requested information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence Otherwise the [party] would be allowed to engage in the proverbial fishing expedition in the hope that there might be something of relevancerdquo in the information sought Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 388 (ED Mich 2012)

Kennedy v Contract Pharmacal Corp CV 12-2664 (JFB) (ETB) United States District Court Eastern District Of NY

Court agreed that ldquohellipthe interrogatories are narrative in nature and should be covered by a deposition and on the ground that the interrogatories exceed twenty-fivehelliprdquo ldquoThe objections are sustained There is no specificity to the requests and no effort to limit these requests to any relevant acts alleged in this action Lacking relevance and specificity the requests are vague overly broad and unduly burdensomerdquo

Angela Ford et al v United States Civil Action No DKC 11-3039 US District Court for the District of Maryland

Court rejected the governmentrsquos request for broad social media-related discovery The government had sought ldquoany documents[] postings pictures messages[] or entries of any kind on social media within the covered period relating to [c]laims by Plaintiffs or their [e]xpertsrdquo The court denied the motion to compel holding that the governmentrsquos request was not narrowly tailored and ldquodoes not describe the categories of material sought rather it relies on Plaintiffs to determine what might be relevantrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 8: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Kennedy v Contract Pharmacal Corp CV 12-2664 (JFB) (ETB) United States District Court Eastern District Of NY

Court agreed that ldquohellipthe interrogatories are narrative in nature and should be covered by a deposition and on the ground that the interrogatories exceed twenty-fivehelliprdquo ldquoThe objections are sustained There is no specificity to the requests and no effort to limit these requests to any relevant acts alleged in this action Lacking relevance and specificity the requests are vague overly broad and unduly burdensomerdquo

Angela Ford et al v United States Civil Action No DKC 11-3039 US District Court for the District of Maryland

Court rejected the governmentrsquos request for broad social media-related discovery The government had sought ldquoany documents[] postings pictures messages[] or entries of any kind on social media within the covered period relating to [c]laims by Plaintiffs or their [e]xpertsrdquo The court denied the motion to compel holding that the governmentrsquos request was not narrowly tailored and ldquodoes not describe the categories of material sought rather it relies on Plaintiffs to determine what might be relevantrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 9: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Angela Ford et al v United States Civil Action No DKC 11-3039 US District Court for the District of Maryland

Court rejected the governmentrsquos request for broad social media-related discovery The government had sought ldquoany documents[] postings pictures messages[] or entries of any kind on social media within the covered period relating to [c]laims by Plaintiffs or their [e]xpertsrdquo The court denied the motion to compel holding that the governmentrsquos request was not narrowly tailored and ldquodoes not describe the categories of material sought rather it relies on Plaintiffs to determine what might be relevantrdquo httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 10: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Root v Balfour Case No 2D13-3205 District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

From the decision ldquohellipthe requested discovery constitutes a fishing expedition The defendants attorney stated These are all things that we would like to look under the hood so to speak and figure out whether thats even a theory worth exploring Even the magistrate acknowledged that relevancy might be a problem noting that 95 percent or 99 percent of this may not be relevant In summary hellip we conclude that the portion of the order permitting the discovery of categories hellipmust be quashed

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 11: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Giachetto v Patchogue Medford Union Free School District No CV 11-6323 (ADS) (AKT) 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83341 (EDNY May 6

2013)

From the decision ldquo[T]he fact that the information [Defendant] seeks is in an electronic file as opposed to a file cabinet does not give [it] the right to rummage through the entire filerdquo

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 12: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Lela Tompkins v Detroit Metro Airport 278 FRD 387 387 (ED Mich 2012) From the decision ldquohellipbased on what has been provided to this Court Defendant has not made a sufficient predicate showing that the material it seeks is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence McCann supra 78 AD3d at 1525 hellipMoreover the request for the entire account which may well contain voluminous personal material having nothing to do with this case is overly broad District courts have discretion to limit the scope of discovery where the information sought is overly broad or would prove unduly burdensome to produce

6th

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 13: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Howell v Buckeye Ranch Inc No 211-cv-1014 2012 US Dist LEXIS 141368 1 (SD Ohio Oct 1 2012)

hellipthe defendants requested the plaintiffrsquos social media usernames and passwords seeking unfettered access to private information From the decision ldquo[A] litigant has no right to serve overbroad discovery requests that seek irrelevant informationrdquo (but an opportunity for the defendants to obtain the requested information through more specific interrogatories and document requests) httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

6th

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 14: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Summary ldquohellipwhile social media is generally discoverable

courts are demanding more specificity in requests for social media information as they

evaluate relevancerdquo Socially Aware Blog March 31 2014 httpwwwsociallyawareblogcom20140331u-s-courts-evolving-approaches-to-social-media-e-discovery

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 15: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Sixth Circuit ldquoAs Tompkins and Howell demonstrate though courts within the Sixth Circuit will not abandon the traditional notions of discovery even when the information sought is stored in a non-traditional

wayhelliprdquo Faruki Ireland amp Cox PLL January 14 2014 httpbusinesslitigationinfocomadvertising-and-mediaarchivesdistrict-courts-within-the-sixth-circuit-weigh-in-on-discoverability-of-social-media-information-apply-traditional-discovery-rules-to-emerging-forms-of-technology

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 16: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

When requesting preservation and discovery of social mediahellip 1 Describe what social media accounts and sources you

want to see 2 Explain why you want to see those accounts and

sources in terms of the claims or defenses you are seeking to support

3 Document specifically how the items requested will help support your case

D4 eDiscovery Service Blog April 22 2014 httpwwwd4discoverycom201404requesting-discovery-of-social-media-and-responding-to-requests-best-practices

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 17: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Safe Cloud Storage and Sharing

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 18: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

What is Cloud Storage Cloud storage is an industry term for managed data storage through hosted network (typically Internet-based) servicehellip The most basic form of cloud storage allows users to upload individual files or folders from their personal computers to a central Internet server This allows users to make backup copies of files in case their originals are lost Users can also download their files from the cloud to other devices and sometimes also enable remote access to the files for other people to share Top considerations in selecting a provider cost usability reliability and reputation httpcompnetworkingaboutcomodnetworkstorageaintroduction-to-cloud-storagehtm

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 19: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Recommended Cloud Storage Services The services listed are recommended on a number of top 10 lists Functionality varies Look for bull storage of and access to your documents online bull accessible through multiple locations and devices bull back up and personal access bull sharing capability bull public access bull desktop folder bull access via mobile apps

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 20: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

What to Watch Out For The NSA issue has underscored concerns about privacy and security for cloud storage whether email or documents of all types Look for encryption and other features to ensure some degree of security Also look for any assurances about longevity There are no guarantees of long-term access Consider use of more than one service or local back ups

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 21: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Dropbox Top recommendation Free account for up to 2GB $99yr for 100GB

Commonly used straightforward mobile friendly Ability to store multiple formats including photos No web browser needed Excellent integration across devices 100GB is $99yr Encrypted but not the most secure

Google Drive Free account for up to 5GB $60yr for 100GB Consider if

yoursquore using other Google services heavily This was Google Docs with file storage added Share and collaborate any document type Autosyncs like Dropbox Works with Windows and Mac file systems

Carbonite A favorite for back up and access anywhere $59yr for unlimited

storage on one machine easy to use bandwidth is limited over 2GB does not back up movie files automatically Easy to use

SpiderOak Very secure encrypted back up service Free account for 2GB

$100yr for 100GB Not the fastest when uploading and downloading Works well with multiple OS Has its own client

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 22: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Your Law Library

Legal information services and education for Hamilton County officials legal professionals

and the public in greater Cincinnati and beyond

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 23: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Where to Find Us

bull 1000 Main St sixth floor bull wwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlib bull wwwfacebookcompagesHamilton-County-

Law-Library-Ohio bull httpstwittercomHCLawLib

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 24: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Benefits bull Research guidance from librarians bull Document delivery via email (cases chapters Shepardrsquos) bull Borrowing from the libraryrsquos collection bull On-site access to Lexis Westlaw BNA tax management portfolios

CCHWK IntelliConnect HeinOnline and more bull Off-site access to Fastcase IntelliConnect HeinOnline Aspen

treatises bull CLEs and training bull Newsletters practice area news updates and alerts bull Meeting rooms with conference phones bull Videoconferencing with other courts and correctional facilities bull Wireless network bull Low-cost off-site Lexis access (solo attorneys only) bull Coffee

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 25: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Cost $100 per year for solo attorneys $80 per year per attorney for firms of 2-14 attorneys $50 per year per attorney for firms of 15-29 attorneys Requires 100 of the firmrsquos attorneys to be HCLL subscribers

But wait Dues are prorated for new subscribers after March 1 to 75 and after June 1 to 50 for the balance of the current subscription year

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 26: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Extend the reach of your law practice by becoming a subscriber today and taking advantage of the professional services and extensive collection of the law library

How to Join httpwwwhamilton-coorgcinlawlibjoinhtml Questions Need a Quote Speak with Vanessa or Mary

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg

Page 27: Mary Jenkins - Cincinnati Bar Association Solo presentation 04232014.pdfMary Jenkins Law Librarian ... seeks is in an electronic file as ...  …

Mary Jenkins Law Librarian amp Director

5139465300 mjenkinscmshamilton-coorg