location based sales promotion strategies
TRANSCRIPT
LOCATION BASED SALES PROMOTION STRATEGIES Caner Dilmener PhD student - Okan University, Business Administration Programme, Istanbul, Turkey. Onur Yazıcıbaşıoğlu PhD student - Okan University, Business Administration Programme, Istanbul, Turkey.
Keywords: Location Based Services (LBS), Location Based Marketing (LBM), Sales Promotion, Retailing, Mobile
Marketing, Permission Marketing
Abstract
Mobile devices have become an important tool in consumer’s live. Consumers start searching every product or service
detail through their mobile devices. It’s important for retailers to promote their products or services and reach
customers on the point of sales via mobile devices. Businesses become closer to the customer and it has become
appropriate to present proposals to the customers with these new technologies.
Location based marketing is still in its infancy and a new concept in literature. Location based sales promotion (LBSP)
can be defined as a process of reaching right customers, at right location, at right time with customized or mass sales
promotion offer by location based tools and technologies. As a result, new concepts and practices should be considered.
Our aim is to create a literature base on location-based sales promotion, define location based sales promotion, discuss
how to manage a location-base sales promotion campaigns regarding push and pull demand strategies with examples
for businesses. This is an exploratory research. This article highlights important issues on location-based sales
promotion and concludes an agenda for future studies.
1. Introduction
In the era of consumer centric marketing and as Kartajaya, Kotler and Setiawan (2010) named it “Marketing 3.0”,
consumers are hit daily by many marketing messages. Point of sale consumer engagement is crucial to affect
consumer’s purchase behavior.
2011 has been declared as the “Year of the Mobile” and as consumers spend more time with their smartphones, they
are more accessible. By knowing the position of a consumer relative to bricks and mortar retail locations, marketers
can trigger relevant alerts and reminders, and provide relevant value-added information, discounts or deals when the
consumer needs it at the right place and at the right time(PwC Report, 2011). This situation has continued to accelerate
after 2012.
According to Sultan et. al. (2009), brand managers view mobile devices as an attractive platform from which to
interact with consumers through various forms of marketing communications, including location based promotions.
Through increased used of location-aware technologies and the development of branded mobile networks, global
wireless and mobile marketing platforms and applications have begun to create fundamental changes in the ways
brands and consumers interact.
The developments in mobile technologies and the increased use of smart phones had led marketers to do targeted
marketing activities easier through mobile devices.
According to a 2009 Gartner report, location targeting will be one of the primary types of marketing predicted to
explode in upcoming years, and by 2013, mobile advertising expenditure will surpass $13 billion. Fueling this growth
are improvements in GPS technology and rapid adoption of smartphones, including iPhone and Blackberry (Davis,
2009). There is an importance of mobile devices for mobile marketing applications.
The mobile device has three important characteristics: ultra portability, location sensitivity and untetheredness (not
restricted with a tether) (Shankar and Balasubramanian, 2009). If a person uses mobile devices, he/she becomes
better equipped and informed as a consumer; consumers start searching every product or service detail through their
mobile devices therefore it’s important for retailers to promote their products or services via mobile devices.
According to Harvey and Needham (2011) the dramatic growth in the social networking, proliferation of smart phones
and drive to create commercial opportunities based on location have led to several new services. According to Winter
(2009), marketers are more interested in “behavioral targeting” that is focusing on developing personalized messages
based on what people are doing on the web or the paths that people take when surfing the web or where they are by
their personal GPS ”system”, the cellphone. More than 80 % of brick and mortar retailers will have wireless networks
available in their stores by 2017 (Motorola Solutions, 2012). Customer’s lives are "internetized" and mobilized in a way
that businesses should use it in order to maximize their profit. Customers also came into position ready to search ,
select and/or purchase.
Location based services had made retailers to target a specific group of customers within a specified location. Location
based sales promotion (LBSP) can be defined as a process of reaching the right customers, at the right location, at the
right time with customized or mass sales promotion offer by location based tools and technologies. Retailers can
increase their sales, attract new customers and collect permission driven database. Location based services (LBS) tools
enable small firms to manage sales promotion campaigns inexpensively. Location based services (LBS) is subject to
change conventional sales promotions. Our study limited only for location-based consumer sales promotion via mobile
devices. Location-based services have great potential for growth; while estimates vary, most research indicates that
revenues are expected to triple in the next five years. In June 2011, Foursquare (the location-based social networking
company) reported that it had exceeded ten million users who have “checked-in”, posting their location to friends over
750 million times (Wireless Communications Bureau, 2012).
Location based marketing is still in its initial stage and it is projected that in the future, as use of smart mobile devices
and tablets increase, retailer’s investment in location based marketing technologies will enhance consumer shopping
experience. Therefore in this article we would like to explain some basic concepts of this issue and then we focused on
strategies that can be used and give some examples of some implications.
2.1. Sales Promotion
Sales promotion is the direct inducement or incentive to the sales force, the distributor, or the consumer, with the
primary objective of creating an immediate sale (Shultz and Robinson, 1982). Sales promotion consists of short term
incentives to encourage purchase or sales of a product or service (Kotler,2006). There are several articles on sales
promotion: Blattberg and Neslin(1990), Kotler (2006),Gedenk and Neslin (2002), Kwok (2005), Low and Mohr (2000)
studied on types of sales promotion tools; Florence et. al. (2011), Buil et al. (2013) studied relationships between sales
promotion and brand equity; Haans and Gijsbrechts compared effectiveness of sales promotion between smaller and
larger supermarkets; Gamliel and Herstein (2011) studied the effects of price promotion on consumer’s purchase
intentions; Jayasingh and Eze(2009), Muk (2012), Im and Ha (2012), Banerjee and Yancey(2010), Sanches et. al. (2012)
studied mobile coupons.
What seems to be consensual is the fact that promotions thought to surprise de the consumers are an important
element of competitive advantage in retail markets with retailers using different promotion techniques to attract
consumers. Some of the most commonly used tools are price promotions, “loss leader” promotions (deep discount
deals), feature advertising (store flyers), and in-store displays (Ailawadi et al., 2009).
2.2. Location Based Services
According to Roebuck (2011) location based services (LBS) is an information or entertainment service, accessible with
mobile devices through the mobile network and using the ability to profit from the geographical position of the mobile
device. Location-based services are information technology services for providing information that has been created,
compiled, selected, or filtered taking into consideration the current locations of the users or those of other persons or
mobile objects (Küpper, 2005).
Location based services enable marketers to provide location relevant information to their customers via mobile
devices; they’ve emerged in the mid-1970 in the US by indentifying the location of callers who dial the 9-1-1 emergency
phone number (Nichols, 2009).
Location services are mainly used in three areas: military and government industries, emergency services, and the
commercial sector (Schiller and Voisard,2004). There are several recent articles on location based services (Dey et.
al.,2010;Phillips et. al.,2010;Zipf et.al.,2012;Zibuschka,2011,Li et. al.,2012). Research by Kühn (2004) illustrated that
new class of services, based on location and context awareness such as a dynamic navigation support is feasible using
GPRS data communication.
Table 1. Categories and examples of LBS applications.
Push Services Pull Services
Person-oriented
Communication Ex. 1: You get an alert from a friend zone application that
a friend has just entered your area.
Ex. 2: A message is pushed to you asking whether you
allow a friend to locate you.
Ex. 1: You request from a friend finder application
who is
Information Ex. 3: You get an alert that a terror alarm has been issued
by the city you are in.
Ex. 2: You look for the nearest cinema in your area
and navigation instructions to get there.
Entertainment Ex. 4: You have opted to participate in a location-based
''shoot 'em up'' game and are being attacked.
Ex. 3: You play a location-based game and look for
another opt-in in your area to attack.
M-Commerce and
Advertising
Ex. 5: A discount voucher is being sent to you from a
restaurant in the area you are in.
Ex. 4: You look for cool events happening in the
area you are in.
Device-oriented
Tracking Ex. 6: An alert is sent to you from an asset-tracking
application that one of your shipments has just deviated
from its foreseen route.
Ex. 5: You request information on where your
truck fleet currently is located in the country.
Ex. 7: You get an alert that your child has left the
playground.
Source: SCHILLER, JOCHEN., VOISARD, AGNES. (2004). Location-based Services. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Location-based services (LBS), allow people to report their current location in real time to a given platform. It is
accessible with mobile devices through the mobile network and can be used in a variety of applications. Although
location- based services have been around since 2000, they were mainly used in commerce with a subscription-based
business model; with the releases of a new generation of smart phones, developers were able to introduce location-
based services to use of the mainstream consumer (IBM Corporation 2012).
Location based services are defined as context-aware services that use the location of the user to adapt the service
accordingly (Kaasinen, 2003 in Pannevis, 2007). From the marketer’s point of view, location based services are the
technologies developed to direct to a product or service while individuals moving or in a particular position
(Yamamoto, 2012).
2.3. Location-based Marketing
Location-based Marketing is a new concept in literature. LBM can be defined as targeting mobile users within a
specified geophone area or a location via mobile marketing tools. Location-based marketing (LBM) targets the user
directly and most of the time, the consumer receives a message on their mobile device containing a call to action (such
as enter a competition, visit a website or order a product) and an incentive, such as a coupon (Gartner IT Glossary,
2012). According to PWC Report (2012), location-based marketing (LBM) bridges the gap between all forms of
marketing media, inclusive of social media and the internet. LBM covers the utilization and /or integration of all media
to engage and market to people in specific places with specific offerings. LBM uses location-based services to reach and
engage with customers based upon where they are located (PwC, 2012).
Figure 1. Types of Location-based Marketing
Source: Adapted from BUCZKOWSKI, A. (2012). Location-Based Marketing: The Academic Framework (Master’s Thesis). Universidade Nova de
Lisboa, Portugal.
According to Stacy DeBroff (2011), real-time discounts delivered to mobile devices will also accelerate, often altogether
with location-based services. Foursquare and Old Navy partnered on a promotion that allowed customers to realize
substantial savings if they checked in to a participating store using the location-based service (Verna, 2011). According
to Bruner & Kumar (2007), location-based advertising (LBA) is the presentation of marketer-controlled information at
a special and certain point where users can receive the advertising campaign.
Here, issue location has the most important attribute because the given advertising and the location are connected in a
way; for example, being very near to the place of discount or being in the store. Such advertisements can turn into
portable elements when the customer does not like the advertisement or read. Because, when the customer is moving,
the device is also moving (Yamamoto, 2006).
Pulling and pushing demand strategies is discussed based on advertising and location-based consumer sales
promotion. Unni and Harmon (2007) study favored pull approach location-based advertising . "Marketers have to rise
Location-based Marketing Location-based analytics
Location-based sales promotion (Dilmener and Yazicibasioglu,2012)
Location-based advertising
to the challenge by providing tangible benefits of LBA and get people to request or “pull” this type of marketing"(Unni
and Harmon, 2007).
2.4. Optimizing Location-Based Marketing
It can be a challenge for any business or brand without a store or physical location to create location-based campaigns,
but the ideas and creative examples below can get a campaign started, including (Carpenter,2012):
• Marketing businesses with no brick-and-mortar location;
• Expanding the definition of a location;
• Choosing the appropriate medium;
• Optimizing location-based marketing with creativity, motivation and value.
Location-based marketing does present challenges, and there are many campaigns failing to really engage the
consumer in a location-based experience. The following aspects are very important when optimizing a location-based
mobile marketing campaign.
2.4.1. Creativity: Putting a QR code on a product or billboard and a QR code that only leads to a webpage does not
create a location-based mobile experience. Creating a scavenger hunt where consumers need to find and scan the QR
codes on billboards around the city is considered as an experience. Using geolocation to create a virtual pop-up store so
users can only purchase a limited-edition product when they are standing in front of an advertisement is an experience:
Heineken’s campaign with the StarPlayer mobile game is a good example. The app let fans interact in real-time during
the Champions League soccer games by asking questions and predicting outcomes throughout the actual game. In this
scenario, the games had a location, but not every viewer could be there. Instead, Heineken made the location wherever
the consumer was watching the game. Using mobile, they brought a location-based experience to every consumer.
2.4.2 Motivation: One of the hardest things on location-based marketing is getting people to take action—to pull their
mobile device out of their pocket and engage with a campaign. This can be even harder when a company doesn’t have
the resources to offer 20 percent off for just walking through their doors and checking-in to their store. The most
successful campaigns motivated their consumers by being easy, timely and solving an immediate need.
The Red Cross operates blood drives at all kinds of locations, many of them mobile and temporary. Working with
Foursquare, the Red Cross introduced the “Blood Donor Badge” which can be unlocked from any blood drive, at any
location. The user simply needs to check in at their location, and then give a shout-out using the words “Red Cross”
“blood” and “donate.”
2.4.3. Value: Foursquare badges and mayor hoods are successful because they’re exclusive; a person can’t get a badge
just by visiting a website, and only one person can be mayor at a time. If a campaign is going to ask the consumer to
take an action, they need to be motivated with something valuable. For example, if a campaign where five billboards
around the city each have a different text code, consumers can be rewarded with an SMS coupon tailored for something
in the immediate vicinity of each billboard. If consumers can pull the same coupons off of marketer’s website, they’re no
longer receiving something unique and valuable from marketer’s location-based mobile campaign.
2.4.4. SoLoMo - Social-Local-Mobile Marketing: we have only discussed the tip of the iceberg for location-based
mobile marketing for non-brick-and-mortar businesses. Even without a permanent location, there are lots of ways to
create an alternative location – at an event, becoming associated with another place, using ad space as a location and by
using consumer as the location. At the very least, it’s essential that marketer’s website is mobile friendly and monitor
the amount of mobile traffic marketer’s business is getting.
Marketers can connect with consumers wherever they are. Mobile devices are key to connecting a campaign to a
consumer’s physical location. That’s why we have buzzwords like SoLoMo or LoSoMo – successful marketing now
makes things Social, Local, and Mobile. While location-based mobile marketing isn’t ubiquitous for mobile users, it’s a
growing trend marketers can – and should – be using. Location-based mobile marketing connects the consumer to a
campaign because it’s real-time, personal and engaging; it’s marketer’s brand wherever they are (Carpenter, 2012).
Later on, marketers don’t have to be a brick-and-mortar business to operate a great location-based mobile campaign.
Location-based campaigns allow marketers to make more than just a static ad. This is the opportunity to create a truly
engaging experience.
2.5. Location-based Consumer Sales Promotion Pull Strategies
In a pull strategy, customers wants to have the product. The intention comes from the customers. As the privacy and
opt-in marketing issues becoming important, pull stragies are important for retailers in order to promote their sales
promotion. A retailer can manage a promotion campaign through a social networking mobile application such as
Foursquare, Facebook Places and Gowalla (which was closed in 2012). Location based consumer sales promotion
campaign can give monetary incentives such as discounts, vouchers, price pack deals, buy 1 get one free or non
monetary incentives such as gift products.
In social networking sites, promotion has been offered to the customers on a conditional base. In order to make a
consumer sales promotion via social networking sites, retailers should acquire the control of it’s virtual location page
on social networking site. The retailer should decide on the type of promotion. Any kind of consumer promotion can be
done by a retailer providing consumer check-in at their retail store. The period of the promotion, the number of the
promotion rewards and the place of the promotion is under the control of the retailer. According to Kaplan (2012),
location based promotions done via Foursquare do not necessarily need to be associated with tangible benefits.
The advantage of doing sales promotion via social networking sites means to get two objectives at one go: the retailer
can gain new customers and, at the same time, promotes its brand/store, which creates brand awareness. Pull based
consumer sales promotion can be done by mobile applications such as Vouchercloud in UK and PlaceCast in USA.
Consumers can choose to receive text messages in a variety of ways—at the store, online, via text-message, mobile
websites or on Facebook and geofences are virtual areas set around physical locations; when an opted-in consumer is
inside a geo-fenced area (a virtual fence that has been specified on a real world map), he/she receives a message from
a business, including a discount, notice of a sale, directions to a store or other content
(http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/22/placecast-brings-location-based-shopping-alerts-to-smartphone-apps). There
are more examples for this kind of implementations. In May 2012, US retailer Target launched a campaign with mobile
couponing app Shopkick that enabled shoppers to collect and exchange points for rewards; customers could earn 60
points just for walking into a store, with even more on offer for certain promotional days throughout the year: points
were also on offer in return for scanning certain products (http://econsultancy.com/tr/blog/11303-eight-great-
location-based-mobile-campaigns-from-2012).
Starpet also started a promotion campaign through Facebook in November 2012. Starpet provided different discount
rates at different Starpet branches, allowing the Foursquare users to check in at Starpet and show their tablet or mobile
device screen to the salesperson: Foursquare users could benefit from discounted fuel prices
(http://otomobil.milliyet.com.tr/starpet-ten-foursquare-kullanicilarina-akaryakit-indirimi/otokampanya/haberdetay/
07.11.2012/1623383/default.htm). Considering the fact that Turkey has one of the highest petrol prices in the world,
sales promotions in the gas sector is highly attractive to the consumers.
2.6. Location-based Consumer Sales Promotion Push Strategies
In a push strategy, the retailer push their products. The intention comes from the retailer who collaborates with GSM
operators. GSM operator has been paid to share itss customer database and afterwards the retailer decided which
persons to target. The selected targeted customers received information about the sales promotion, when the targeted
customer came nearby the retailer’s location (retailer’s geofence).
The geofence can be decided by the retailers. The advantage of this strategy is that retailers can offer customized sales
promotions to the customers. Mobile application technologies offer the potential for location based price promotions,
in which customers receive coupons and promotions directly on their cell phones when they are near a store that sells
items they may be interested in purchasing (Grewal et al., 2011).
There are several mobile advertising tools: Short Message Service (SMS), Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS),
Interactive Voice Response (IVR), Wap Push and others. Short Message Service (SMS) is one of the most used type of
mobile advertising. A text message about sales promotion can be send to customers.
In the last quarter of 2011, Vodafone and Caffé Nero Turkey have managed to attract the attention of customers with an
interesting campaign; Vodafone users, passing nearby a Caffe Nero had received a free coffee offer via SMS, allowing
them to give a free coffee gift to their friends. Within 3 days, over 500 coffee cups have been consumed by the campaign
users. The aim of the campaign was to receive instant feedback from the customers and it was achieved
(http://sosyalmedyabulteni.com/vodafone-ve-caffe-nerodan-basarili-bir-pazarlama-ornegi). Multimedia Message
Service (MMS) enables sending pictures, videos and other type of multimedia to mobile devices. Interactive Voice
Response (IVR) is a technology that allows retailers to call customers with an automated sales promotion message.
WAP Push enables retailers to add a link to a promotion offer. Location-based mobile coupons are getting popular.
According to Prosper Mobile Insights research, 67% of mobile users agree that location-based coupons on a mobile
device are "convenient and useful", while 42% say that they have already used a mobile coupon of some kind
(http://www.trendwatching.com/trends/dealerchic).
2.7. Opt-in / Opt-out, Permission Based Marketing
According to Smith (2004), opt-in means that a prospect or customer has not granted permission to be interrupted
with mailings, e-mails and telemarketing (telephone calls) unless he has made the effort and decided to ticking an opt-
in box; this is a proactive agreement to receive electronic communications and opt-out assumes that a customer has
given permission to receive marketing communications unless he has actively made the effort and “opted out” by
ticking an “opt-out” box.
In addition to get sure that consumers receive proper notice of privacy practices, companies also face the challenge
of making sure that consumers are afforded with the opportunity to exercise meaningful choice with respect to the
collection and use of their personal information. The concept of “choice” in privacy policies refers to providing the
consumer with the opportunity to tell a company what it can and cannot do with his/her personal information. Choice
can take the form of “opt-out,” where the default option permits the company to use personal information in a
particular way unless the consumer objects, or “opt-in,” where the company cannot use personal information without
the advance consent of the consumer.
In the LBS business environment, companies encounter unique challenges to ensuring that consumers have the
opportunity to make meaningful choices. One issue these companies face is whether consumer choice should be opt-out
or opt-in for location information, although there appears to be a developing consensus in the LBS industry that opt-in
is appropriate for such sensitive information. A Zogby International Survey commissioned by Common Sense Media
and conducted in August 2010 found that “the vast majority of respondents say that search engines and online social
networking sites should not be able to share their physical location with other companies before they have given
specific authorization.” Another particular challenge facing companies is minimizing interference with the user
experience while concurrently offering meaningful choice to consumers. As noticed at the FCC Forum, there is a
“tension between granularity and simplicity” between the desire to ensure that consumers are provided the
opportunity to make meaningful choices in real time regarding the use of their location-based information and the
desire to ensure a seamless user experience. Companies and third party intermediaries are developing creative choice
mechanisms having this in mind, including utilizing uniform language that would allow consumers to make their
privacy preferences known by categories or characteristics.
Individually, companies have taken a variety of approaches to consumer choice. Apple acknowledges the importance of
“providing its customers with the ability to control the location-based services capabilities of their devices” (Letter
from Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel and Senior Vice President, Legal and Government Affairs, to The Honorable
Edward J. Markey, U.S. House of Representatives (July 12, 2010)).As Microsoft has stated (Letter from Andy Lees,
President, Microsoft Mobile Communications Business, to The Honorable Fred Upton, U.S. House of Representatives
(May 9, 2011))Microsoft does not collect information to determine the approximate location of a device unless a user
has expressly allowed an application to collect it. Users that have allowed an application to access location data always
have the option to access the location at an application level or they can disable location collection altogether for all
applications by disabling the location service feature on their phone. Google states that “opt-in consent and clear notice
are required for collection and use of location information on Android” (Google Inc. ex parte, WT Docket No. 11-84 (July
8, 2011)
2.8. Security / Fraud and Limitations on Location Based Services (LBS) – Location Based Marketing (LBM)
The promise of LBS, however, comes with challenges and concerns. Because mobile devices have the ability—and often
the technical requirement—to regularly transmit their location to a network, they also enable the creation of a precise
record of a user’s locations over time. This can result in the creation of a very accurate and highly personal user profile,
which raises questions of how, when and by whom this information can and should be used.
In light of these developments, the staff of the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC” or “Commission”) has
prepared this report on LBS. As discussed in greater detail below, drawing upon its experience in protecting consumer
privacy, Commission staff believes:
LBS have tremendous potential to provide value and foster innovation to benefit the economy and consumers;
LBS industry players face challenges as they attempt to provide consumers with appropriate notice and choice
with respect to the use of the data generated by LBS and the devices and networks that host them;
Industry is taking steps to answer these challenges but the degree of responsiveness varies among companies
and industry segments; and
New issues continue to emerge that need to be addressed, timely and responsively.
Consequently, in collaboration with federal partners and industry representatives, Commission staff will continue to
monitor industry compliance with applicable statutory requirements and evolving industry best practices to ensure
LBS evolves to meet its fullest potential while protecting the legitimate interests of consumers in safeguarding their
personally identifiable information.
Location-based services are transforming the ways people across the country conduct business, organize their lives,
and have fun. They can save time, money, and even lives. However, because of the technologies that enable them, LBS
have the inherent ability to create accurate snapshots of their users’ activities that can contain very personal
information. As both the potential and the challenges of LBS have become more understood, the US Federal
Communications Commission, along with other federal agencies and Congress, has begun to assess ways to best ensure
the LBS users enjoy all their benefits and that their confidential information is secure. Industry has also played an
important role. The Commission has a long tradition of ensuring that the privacy of consumers is protected (The
Consumer Privacy Protection Act of 2011, H.R. 1528, 112th Cong. (2011)). Consumers have opinions and want to be
heard, yet sometimes, they would prefer to be anonymous in sharing these opinions or their whereabouts. With
location verification it's possible to ensure a person’s privacy and still consider their insight credible and worthy and
many international software companies are still working on such software regulations (Rush, 2012).
3.Conclusion
Mobile marketing is a new area, and SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises) should be careful before spending too much
money in such a new area; businesses need to be cautious and keep some crucial issues in mind before running a
mobile marketing campaign. Location based marketing is an integrated and collaborative marketing process. Mobile
analytics, location-based advertising and location-based sales promotion should be managed in an integrated way.
Businesses can conduct a successful location-based sales promotion campaign through a good collaboration with
service providers and GSM operators.
Location based marketing is one of the fastest developing and versatile direct marketing strategy. This versatility also
makes location based marketing sales promotion a strategy way of acting with a lot of advantages and innovations.
Location based services has shown that its impact on sales promotion with correctly narrowed down target groups is
also working very efficiently as far as costs are concerned. Location Based Marketing is also considered not only as a
short time marketing strategy but it’s one of the strongest long term player on the Integrated Marketing
Communication area. The brilliant future of LBM has also some question marks related to it and one of the biggest one
is the customer’s privacy and security; companies/brands and international commissions are working hardly to offer
different choices.
The key to achieve success on location based marketing (LBM) is knowing the customers, observing what they are
doing and then matching marketing strategies to the customer behavior. There is a huge opportunity for businesses to
get ahead of the game as mobile marketing is still in its childhood.
This paper has thrown up many questions in need of further research. Further research might explore whether location
based sales promotion cause brand switching. It would be interesting to study the effects of gender, age and sector
factors. Further research should try to determine which location-based advertising tool is the most effective. Another
research question might be: are location based sales promotion effective on convenience products?
4.Acknowledgements
Prof. Dr. Gonca Telli YAMAMOTO encouraged us to research location based marketing. The authors wishes to express
their gratitudes to Prof. Dr. Gonca Telli YAMAMOTO for guiding and reviewing their article.
References AILAWADI, K., DONTHU, N. & GAURI, D. (2009). Communication and Promotion Decisions in Retailing: A Review and Directions for Future, Journal of Retailing (85), 42-45. BANERJEE, S. & YANCEY, S. (2010). Enhancing mobile coupon redemption in fast food campaigns. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4(2), 97-100. BLATTBERG, R. & NESLIN, S. (1990). Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods and Strategies. Prentice Hall.
BRUNER, G. C., & KUMAR, A. (2007). Attitude toward location-based advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(2), 3-15. BUCZKOWSKI, A. (2012). Location-Based Marketing: The Academic Framework (Master’s Thesis). Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal. BUIL, I., CHERNATONY, L. & MARTINEZ, E. (2013). Examining the Role of Advertising and Sales Promotions in Brand Equity Creation, Journal of Business Research (66), 115-122. BUTCHER, D. (2011). Location-based marketing can increase average order value, frequency, loyalty [Online],Available at: http://www.mobilemarketer.com/cms/news/advertising/9540.html[05.12.2012 [15.12.2012]. CARPENTER, C. (2012). SoLoMo: Location-Based Mobile Marketing For Non-Brick-and-Mortar Businesses [Online]. Available at: http://www.carousel30.com/about/news/coverage/solomo-location-based-mobile-marketing-non-brick-and-mortar-businesses [15.02.2013]. DAVIS, A. (2009). Location-based Marketing Platform, 1020 Placecast Secures $5 Million in Series B Funding[Online], Available at: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/11/prweb3222984.htm [15.12.2012]. DELOITTE. (2012). Retail Sector Update [Online], Available at: http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom- Turkey/Local%20Assets/Documents/turkey_tr_cb_retailsectorupdate_040612.pdf [10.12.2012]. DEY, A., HIGHTOWER, J., & DAVIES, N. (2010). Location-based services. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 9(1), 11-12. FLORENCE, P.V.,GUIZANI, H. & MERUNKA, D. (2011). The Impact of Brand Personality and Sales Promotions on Brand Equity, Journal of Business Research (64), 24-28. GAMIEL, E. & HERSTEIN, R. (2011). To save or to lose: does framing price promotion affect consumers’ purchase intentions? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28, (2), 152 – 158. Gartner IT Glossary. Location-Based Marketing (LBM). Available at: http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/location-based-marketing-lbm [15.02.2013]. GREWAL, D., AILAWADI, K., GAURI, D., HALL, K., KOPALLE, P. & ROBERTSON, J. (2011). Innovations in Retail Pricing and Promotions. Journal of Retailing (1,2011), 43-52. HARVEY, T. & NEEDHAM, G. (2011). NFC Mobile Phones-Opportunities for Location Based Marketing[Online], Available at: http://fenbrook.com/wp-content/upLoads/2011/04/Location-Based-Marketing-White-Paper-1-2.pdf [15.12.2012]. HERRAN, G., SIGUE, S.P. & ZACCOUR, G. (2010), The Dilemma of Pull and Push Price Promotions, Journal of Retailing (86), No. 1, 51-68. IM, H. & HA. Y. (2012) Who are the users of mobile coupons? A profile of USA consumers. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 6(3), 215-232. JAVASINGH, S. & EZE, C. (2009). An Empirical analysis of consumer behavioral intention toward mobile coupons in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Information, 4(2), 221-242. KAPLAN, A. (2012). If you love something, let it go mobile: Mobile Marketing and mobile social media 4x4. Business Horizons (55), 129-139. KARTAJAYA, H., KOTLER, P. & SETIAWAN, I. (2006). From Products to Customers to the Human Spirit: Marketing 3.0 (1 Edition). WILEY.
KOTLER, P. (2006). Principles of Marketing(Eleventh Edition).Pearson Prentice Hall. KÜHN, P. (2004). Location-Based Services in Mobile Communication Infrastructures. International Journal of Electronics and Communications (58), 159-164. KÜPPER, A. (2005). Location-based services: Fundamentals and Applications (New Edition). Wiley, John & Sons. KWOK, S. & UNCLES, M (2005). Sales Promotion effectiveness: the impact of consumer differences at an ethnic –group level. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(3), 170-186. LI, K. & DU, K. (2012). Building a targeted mobile advertising system for location-based services. Decision Support Systems. LOW, G. S. & MOHR, J. J. (2000). Advertising vs. sales promotion: a brand management perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(6), 389-414. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS. (2012). How Brick-And-Mortar Retailers Can Win The Omnichannel Battle[Online], Available at: http://www.thelbma.com/files/324-Motorola-OmniChannel%20Study.pdf [15.02.2013]. MUK, A. (2012). Perceptions of mobile coupons: A cross-national study. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 13(4), 311-324. NICHOLS, S. (2009). Will Mobile Computing’s Future Be Location, Location, Location?. Computer, Volume (42), 14-17. PANNEVIS, M. (2007). I’m bored! Where is Everybody? Location Based Systems for Mobile Phones (Master’s Thesis). University of Amsterdam, Holland. PHILLIPS, A., SCHROTH, F., PALMER, M., ZIELINSKI, G., SMITH, P. & CUNNIGHAM, M. (2010). U.S. Patent No. 7,848,765. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. PWC. (2012). Marketing Goes Local [Online], Available at: http://www.researchfindr.com/marketing-goes-local [10.12.2012]. ROEBUCK, K. (2011). Location-Based Services (Lbs): High-Impact Strategies - What You Need to Know: Definitions, Adoptions, Impact, Benefits, Maturity, Vendors. Emereo Pty Limited. RUSH, D. (2012). Yes, It's True: Location and Consumer Privacy Can Co-Exist[Online]. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-rush/location-based-technologies_b_2433944.html [15.02.2013]. SANCHES, J., VELASCO, J., RUIZ, L & GOMEZ A. (2012). AN NFC-Based Solution for Discount and Loyalty Mobile Coupons. In Near Field Communication (NFC), 2012 4th International Workshop on (pp.45-50). IEEE. SCHILLER, J. & VOISARD, A. (2004). Location-based Services. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. SCHLUTZ, E. & ROBINSON, W. (1982), Sales Promotion Management, Crain Books. SHANKAR, V. (2009). Mobile Marketing: A Synthesis and Prognosis. Journal of Interactive Marketing(23), 118-129. SHULTZ, D. & ROBINSON, W. (1982). Sales Promotion Management.NTC Business Books. SMITH, P. R. & TAYLOR, J. (2004) Marketing Communications: An Integrated Approach, Kogan Page Publishers. SMITH, P.R. & TAYLOR, J. (2004). Marketing Communications: An Integrated Approach (4th edition). London. SULTAN, F., ROHM A. J., GAO, T. & PAGANI, M. (2012). Brand in the hand: A cross-market investigation of consumer acceptance of mobile marketing. Business Horizons(55), 485-493. SULTAN, F., ROHM, A. & GAO, T. (2009). Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Marketing A Two-Country Study of Youth Markets. Journal of Interactive Marketing (23), 308-320.
UNNI, F. & HARMON, R. (2007). Perceived Effectiveness of Push Vs. Pull Mobile Location-Based Advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising (Vol 7,No:2), 28-40. VERNA, P. (2011). Top Digital Trends for 2012. Checking In Checking Out(12). eMarketer. VU, T. & RYU, K. (2009). A method for predicting future location of mobile user for location-based services system. Computer & Industrial Engineering (57), 91-105. WINTER, R. (2009). New Communications Approaches in Marketing: Issues and Research Directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing(23), 108-117. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION BUREAU (2012). Location-based Services An Overview of Opportunuties and Other Considerations. Washington DC: Federal Communications Comission. YAMAMOTO, G.T. (2010), Mobilized Marketing and the Consumer: Technological Developments and Challenges, Business Science Reference. YAMAMOTO, G.T. (2012), Mail Correspondance, 30.12.2012. ZIBUSCHKA, J., RANNENBERG, K. & KÖLSCH, T. (2011). Location-based services. Digital privacy, 679-695. ZIPF, A. & JÖST, M. M. (2012). Location-Based Services. Springer Handbook of Geographic Information, 417-421. http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/22/placecast-brings-location-based-shopping-alerts-to-smartphone-apps [15.02.2013]. http://econsultancy.com/tr/blog/11303-eight-great-location-based-mobile-campaigns-from-2012 [15.02.2013]. http://otomobil.milliyet.com.tr/starpet-ten-foursquare-kullanicilarina-akaryakit-indirimi/otokampanya/haberdetay/07.11.2012/1623383/default.htm [15.02.2013]. http://sosyalmedyabulteni.com/vodafone-ve-caffe-nerodan-basarili-bir-pazarlama-ornegi [15.02.2013]. http://www.trendwatching.com/trends/dealerchic [15.02.2013]. FCC 2012 (Federal Communications Commision)Public Notice, 26 FCC Rcd 6757 (2011). Manufacturing, and Trade and the Subcomm. on Communications and Technology of the H. Committee on Energy and Commerce, 112th Cong. (July 14, 2011). http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=8769 Protecting Mobile Privacy: Your Smartphones, Tablets, Cell Phones and Your Privacy: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Privacy, Technology and the Law of the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 112th Cong. (May 10, 2011), available at:http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=e655f9e2809e5476862f735da16bd1e7 [10.02.2013] ECPA Reform and the Revolution in Location Based Technologies and Services: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on the Constitution , Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties of the H. Comm. on the Judiciary, 111th Cong. (June 24, 2010). The Collection and Use of Location Information for Commercial Purposes (June 24 2010) Available at : http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/111th/111-109_57082.PDF [10.02.2013]. “Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Business and Policy Makers,” FTC Privacy Report at 60 (Mar. 2012), available at http://ftc.gov/os/2012/03/120326privacyreport.pdf [10.02.2013]. McKinsey Global Inst., Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity 85 (2011), available at http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/publications/big_data/pdfs/MGI_big_data_full_report.pdf [15.02.2013]. “Privacy Policy Guidance Memorandum,” Dept. of Homeland Security, Memorandum No. 2008-01 at 3 (Dec. 29, 2008), available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_policyguide_2008-01.pdf. [15.02.2013]. “Commercial Data Privacy in a Networked World: A Framework for Protecting Privacy and Promoting Innovation in the Global Economy,” Dept. of Commerce Internet Policy Task Force at 14 (Feb. 2012) available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/privacy-final.pdf. (“Privacy Blueprint”). Ginger Myles, Adrian Friday and Nigel Davies, “Preserving Privacy in Environments with Location-Based Applications,” Pervasive Computing, IEEE Computing Society at 56 (January-March 2003).
“Paper, Plastic… or Mobile? An FTC Workshop on Mobile Payments” (Apr. 26, 2012), available at http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/mobilepayments/. Mobile Location Based Services Marketing Whitepaper, Mobile Marketing Association, at 17 (Oct. 2011), available at http://www.mmaglobal.com/MobileLBSWhitepaper.pdf (“MMA White Paper”). Guidelines for Ethical Business Practices, Direct Marketing Association, at 42 (May 2011), available at http://www.dmaresponsibility.org/Guidelines/ (“DMA Guidelines”). Letter from Andy Lees, President, Microsoft Mobile Communications Business, to The Honorable Fred Upton, U.S. House of Representatives (May 9, 2011). Comments of Verizon Wireless, WT Docket No. 11-84, at 2 (July 8, 2011).See Foursquare Labs, Inc. Privacy Policy (Jan. 12, 2011), available at https://foursquare.com/legal/privacy. Apple Inc. Privacy Policy (Oct. 21, 2011), available at http://www.apple.com/privacy/. Loopt, Inc. Privacy Notice (Oct. 15, 2009), available at https://app.loopt.com/loopt/privacyNotice.aspx. Comments of AT&T Inc., WT Docket No. 11-84, at 5 (July 8, 2011). Privacy Blueprint at 14 (promoting greater consistency among privacy notices to make companies’ privacy practices “a more salient point of competition among different products and services” ). ( July 8, 2011). Remarks of Brendon Lynch, Chief Privacy Officer, Microsoft Corp., at FCC Forum (identifying privacy as “core to creating trust with our customer and core to our business success”).(July 8, 2011). Remarks of Peter Swire, C. William O’Neill Professor of Law, Moritz College of Law of the Ohio State University, at FCC Forum (“there is a broad sense that opt in is the way to go”)(July 8, 2011). DMA Guidelines at 41 (“Marketers should obtain prior express consent from existing and prospective customers before sending mobile marketing to a wireless device.”). Memorandum from Zogby International to Common Sense Media (Aug. 24, 2010), available at http://www.privacylives.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Final. 2012 MMA White Paper at 4. Letter from Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel and Senior Vice President, Legal and Government Affairs, to The Honorable Edward J. Markey, U.S. House of Representatives (July 12, 2010). Letter from Andy Lees, President, Microsoft Mobile Communications Business, to The Honorable Fred Upton, Available at U.S. House of Representatives (May 9, 2011). SimpleZesty Agency Releases (October 12, 2011) Available at: http://www.simplyzesty.com/mobile/augmented-reality-app-turns-the-world-into-virtual-art-gallery/.