launching nanosats affordably, problems and solutions

Upload: bmsprague

Post on 03-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    1/15

    LAUNCHING NANOSATS AFFORDABLY,

    PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

    Mr Alan Webb

    Commercial Space Technologies Ltd., United Kingdom, [email protected]

    Mr. Abe Bonnema

    Innovative Solutions In Space B.V., The Netherlands, [email protected]

    Dr. John Paffett

    Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd., United Kingdom,[email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    2/15

    CST CORPORATE PAGE(coming to a slide near you!)

    CONSULTANCY

    space technology and planningInsurance

    UK government

    CST Services

    COMMERCE

    marketing and tradingrepresentation and logistics

    management/facilitation of international projects

    LAUNCHERS

    launcher services brokeringlaunch solutions provision

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    3/15

    CST Launching History

    YEAR DATE LAUNCHER

    (MODE)

    SATELLITE(S)

    1995 August 31 Tsyklon (1 piggy-back) Fasat Alpha

    1998 July 10 Zenit (2 piggy-back) Fasat Bravo + TM Sat

    1999 April 21 Dnepr (1 dedicated) Uo Sat 12 (first commercial use of SS-18)

    2000 June 28 Cosmos (2 piggy-back) Tsinghua 1 +Snap (first SSO flight of Cosmos)

    2000 September 26 Dnepr (1 piggy-back) Tiung Sat

    2002 November 28 Cosmos (main in

    cluster)

    Alsat-first Disaster Monitoring Constellation

    (DMC)2003 September 27 Cosmos (cluster) NigeriaSat-1, BilSat-1 and UK-DMC (all

    DMC)

    2004 June 29 Dnepr (main in cluster) Demeter (CNES, first SSO flight of Dnepr)

    2005 October 27 Cosmos (cluster) TopSat, ChinaSat (DMC), SSETI Express+ 3

    cubesats

    2008 August 29 Dnepr (cluster) RapidEye constellation

    2009 July 29 Dnepr (cluster) UK-DMC2 + DEIMOS-1 (both DMC)

    2009 September 17 Soyuz/Fregat (1 piggy-back)

    SumbandilaSat (first piggy-back from thislauncher combination)

    2010 June 15 Dnepr (1 of a pair) Picard (CNES, paired with Prisma)

    2011 August 17 Dnepr (cluster) NigeriaSat-2 and NigeriaSat-X

    2012 July 22 Soyuz/Fregat (1 piggy-

    back)

    ADS-1B

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    4/15

    ISIS Company Overview

    ISIS is a Nanosatellite Mission Specialist

    Spin-off of Delfi-C3 nanosatellite project of TU Delft

    Office locations in Delft, NL, and South Africa

    ISIS offers systems, platforms, missions and applications

    Also specialized in launch services for nanosatellites

    Developer of innovative launch deployment systems

    Multiple nanosatellites launched on various launch vehicles

    Industrial partner for the QB50 Mission and Launch

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    5/15

    TRITON-1:AIS DemonstratorA highly innovative payload, receiving the AIS position

    messages that are broadcasted by virtually all ocean

    going vessels.

    This miniaturized, and low-power payload runs

    advanced signal processing algorithms in order to be

    able to correctly receive such messages in areas of high

    vessel density, where most current satellite AIS

    detection systems are blinded by the overlap ofsignals and the resulting interference.

    www.ISILaunch.com Our mission is to launch yours

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    6/15

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    7/15

    Surrey Satellite Technology - a history of success

    7

    HERITAGE: Flight proven - low risk

    41 Satellites completedc.200 satellite

    years on-orbit experience

    40 Low Earth Orbit, 1 Medium Earth

    Orbit

    RESULTS: All projectsfixed price, delivered on-timeand

    on-budget

    SUCCESS: Very high mission success >95% in last 10

    yearsproven equipment and fullredundancy

    CUSTOMERS: Variety of customers including many blue

    chip operators as well as

    15 successful training programmes

    Mission

    Definition &

    Design

    Subsystem

    Design &

    Manufacturing

    Assembly

    Integration &

    Test

    Spacecraft

    Testing

    Environmental

    Test

    Mission

    Commission &Operations

    Launch

    Procurement,

    Management,

    Integration &Support

    Cradle-to-grave

    capability from

    mission definition

    through to launch,

    commissioning and

    operations.

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    8/15

    The CubeSat Launching Dilemma CubeSat benefits:

    Modular design of uniform dimensions (1U = 10cm X 10cm X 10cm)

    Off the shelf components (thus cheap and easy to design and build)

    Good training platform for satellite engineers

    Attracts a large and diverse range of technical experience (from university

    groups to companies well established in industry) Inspires ingenuity

    CubeSat shortfalls:

    The stimulation of numerous engineers with limited capital and experience forlaunch procurement (mainly students and start-ups formed by youngprofessionals)

    Creates a significant number of very small payloads looking for launchopportunities at minimal cost

    Overwhelms commercial launch service providers (LSPs) with enquiries

    Offers minimal return for LSPs efforts

    LSPs perturbing CubeSat developers with inflated launch prices

    CubeSat launch assurance becomes unpredictable, challenging and costly

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    9/15

    What Does the Average CubeSat Customer

    Require?

    An experienced launch procurement andmanagement team

    Predictable, reliable and regular launchopportunities

    Affordable launch prices

    BUT... launch management fees that do not scale down with

    satellite size often outweigh the cost developmentand are not budgeted for

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    10/15

    CST and SSTL NanoSat History

    TopSat, DMC, SSETI

    Express, plus three

    CubeSats launched

    on COSMOSOctober 27th2005

    (bottom right).

    SNAP-1 launched on COSMOS June 28th2000 (left & top right).

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    11/15

    Developing an Alternative CubeSat

    Launching Model

    STRaND-1 launched on PSLV February 25th2013 (top left) and Ukube-1 to be

    launched on Soyuz-Fregat late in 2013 (top right)

    ISIPOD CubeSat dispensers (bottom left) and the QB50 deployment systemprovided by ISIS (bottom right)

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    12/15

    An Alternative Model

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    13/15

    Individual Company Roles

    ISISworks directly with the customer, integrating theirCubeSat payload (alongside others) into a designateddispenser.

    SSTLarranges for reliable and frequent piggy-backopportunities for aggregated Cubesat packages in conjunctionwith their own missions. The launch campaign team can alsobe leveraged to support the management and integrationactivities. This reinforces an already well established

    relationship between SSTL and the LSP.

    CST - interacts with and supports SSTL in the negotiation withand management of the LSP, and provides much needed in-country support for the launch campaign activities.

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    14/15

    CubeSat Dispenser Integration

    Aggregated package of CubeSats of

    about 50 kg, with its own

    deployment sequencer system

    6U and 12U CubeSats and their relevant

    ISIPOD deployer types

  • 8/12/2019 Launching Nanosats Affordably, Problems and Solutions

    15/15

    Conclusions CubeSat developers from academic institutions or fledgling companies

    often have constrained budgets

    Lacking available dedicated nanosat launchers force these CubeSatdevelopers to approach several LSPs

    Overwhelmed by CubeSat customers offering little return for the effortrequired, LSPs attempt to discourage through increased launch prices.

    CubeSat customers take advantage of the experience and reputation ofCST, ISIS and SSTL in the launcher market

    Multiple CubeSats are integrated into one ISIS dispenser, sharingmanagerial, logistical and launch costs

    CST arranges piggy-back launches on frequent SSTL missions Cost advantages are obtained by combining launch contracts presented to

    the LSP

    ISIS dispensers are handled as one payload, easing pressure off the LSPresulting in reasonable launch quotes.

    The end result is affordable, reliable and frequent launch opportunities for

    the CubeSat customer.