latimer, oklahoma: overall prosperity 46.2 (10th decile*)...civic and social participation 30% 31.5...
TRANSCRIPT
Latimer, Oklahoma: Overall Prosperity 46.2 (10th decile*)
Prosperity over time
Breakdown of performance2010
Score10-year trend 2020
Decile (1 to 10)2020
10-yeardecile change
Rank - Oklahoma (1 to 77)2020
Overall Prosperity 44.3 46.2 10 1 52
Inclusive Societies 52.4 51.0 6 - 15
Safety and Security 75.6 80.2 3 1 15
Personal Freedom 45.7 48.8 5 - 56
Governance 41.7 35.8 10 2 1
Social Capital 46.7 39.4 9 4 62
Open Economies 39.5 41.5 10 1 70
Business Environment 46.2 40.6 8 2 65
Market Access and Infrastructure 30.1 30.2 10 1 58
Economic Quality 42.2 53.8 8 - 57
Empowered People 40.8 46.0 10 - 49
Living Conditions 35.4 44.4 10 - 64
Health 40.5 43.3 10 - 42
Education 43.0 49.2 6 1 31
Natural Environment 44.2 47.3 9 - 31
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Business Environment
Market Access and InfrastructureEconomic Quality
Safety and Security
Personal Freedom
Governance
Social Capital
Living Conditions
Health
Education
Natural Environment
9th 9th 9th 10th 9th 10th 10th 10th10th 10th 10th
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Ove
rall
Pros
perit
y
Latimer, Oklahoma Decile Oklahoma US 8 State Averagenth
Latimer, Oklahoma (10th decile*)
Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020
75.6 80.2 3 1 15 45.7 48.8 5 - 56
Terror-related Crime 15% 100.0 100.0 1 - 1 Agency 30% 59.6 66.1 4 - 1
Violent Crime 50% 77.9 80.8 2 1 12 Freedom of Association and Speech 15% 40.0 40.0 4 - 1
Property Crime 35% 61.8 70.8 4 1 15 Absence of Legal Discrimination 25% 20.0 32.6 5 - 1
Social Tolerance 30% 56.3 49.3 7 2 57
Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020
41.7 35.8 10 2 1 46.7 39.4 9 4 62
Political Accountability 30% 54.2 63.4 4 2 1 Personal and Family Relationships 25% 51.0 53.8 9 1 48
Rule of Law 35% 25.0 10.5 10 - 1 Social Networks 25% 53.7 33.7 8 3 9
Government Integrity 35% 47.8 37.5 10 2 1 Institutional Trust 20% 55.4 37.1 9 1 18
Civic and Social Participation 30% 31.5 33.8 3 1 44
Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020
46.2 40.6 8 2 65 30.1 30.2 10 1 58
Financing Ecosystems 40% 22.2 14.6 9 1 65 Communications 40% 6.1 6.1 9 - 62
Domestic Market Contestability 30% 52.7 49.6 8 4 1 Resources 25% 56.7 56.9 5 1 64
Burden of Regulation 10% 57.5 42.8 6 4 1 Transport 35% 40.0 40.0 7 - 23
Labor Market Flexibility 10% 71.2 69.8 5 1 1
Price Distortions 10% 86.5 85.5 2 1 1
Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020
42.2 53.8 8 - 57
Fiscal Sustainability 25% 41.0 47.2 9 1 34
Productivity and Competitiveness 25% 38.6 57.3 7 1 28
Dynamism 20% 53.2 60.8 2 2 22
Labor Force Engagement 30% 39.0 51.6 9 2 71
Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020
35.4 44.4 10 - 64 40.5 43.3 10 - 42
Material Resources 25% 48.8 47.9 9 2 52 Behavioral Risk Factors 15% 47.7 48.7 9 1 36
Nutrition 15% 25.6 42.4 10 - 66 Preventative Interventions 15% 28.6 33.4 7 - 17
Water Services 15% 28.6 32.9 10 - 59 Care Systems 15% 54.0 58.4 4 - 22
Shelter 15% 45.0 59.5 5 3 64 Mental Health 15% 40.2 38.4 10 - 65
Connectedness 15% 28.2 45.2 9 3 54 Physical Health 20% 35.4 30.0 10 - 68
Protection from Harm 15% 27.5 36.0 10 - 63 Longevity 20% 39.2 52.1 8 2 23
Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank Overall Prosperity Decile Oklahoma Rank2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2020 10-yr dec. change 2020
43.0 49.2 6 1 31 44.2 47.3 9 - 31
Pre-Primary Education 5% 65.5 65.3 2 - 20 Emissions 25% 52.2 55.6 8 - 46
Primary Education 20% 50.1 54.8 6 - 56 Exposure to Air Pollution 25% 32.2 40.2 9 - 45
Secondary Education 25% 47.8 61.8 5 3 11 Forest, Land and Soil 20% 41.0 41.3 8 2 3
Tertiary Education 25% 35.6 31.0 9 3 36 Freshwater 20% 71.5 72.0 5 1 17
Adult Skills 25% 35.4 47.0 6 1 34 Preservation Efforts 10% 6.6 6.6 5 - 1
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Economic Quality
Living Conditions Health
Education Natural Environment
Safety and Security Personal Freedom
Governance Social Capital
Business EnvironmentMarket Access and Infrastructure
Latimer, Oklahoma: Safety and Security (3rd decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Terror-related Crime (1st) 15% 100.0 100.0 1 1 Violent Crime (2nd) 50% 77.9 80.8 3 2
Mass shooting deaths GVAdeaths /1,000,000 population
1.5 0.0 0.0 1 1 Murder NACJDdeaths /100,000 population
1.5 0.0 0.0 1 1
Mass shooting injuries GVAinjuries /1,000,000 population
1.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 Rape NACJDincidents /100,000 population
1.0 9.4 0.0 3 1
Terrorism deaths GTDdeaths /1,000,000 population
1.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 Aggravated assaults NACJDassaults /100,000 population
1.0 226.1 126.2 7 4
Terrorism injuries GTDinjuries /1,000,000 population
0.5 0.0 0.0 1 1 Robbery NACJDincidents /100,000 population
0.5 0.0 9.7 1 4
Terrorism events GTDevents /1,000,000 population
0.5 0.0 0.0 1 1
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Property Crime (4th) 35% 61.8 70.8 5 4 #N/A #N/A ## ##
Burglary NACJDincidents /100,000 population
1.5 593.5 378.5 6 5
Motor vehicle theft NACJDincidents /100,000 population
0.5 169.6 116.4 8 6
Larceny theft NACJDincidents /100,000 population
1.0 895.0 591.9 3 1
Identity theft FTCreports /100,000 population
0.5 67.4 85.3 5 5
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Personal Freedom (5th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Agency (4th) 30% 59.6 66.1 4 4Freedom of Association and Speech (4th)
15% 40.0 40.0 4 4
Fatal police shootings of unarmed civilians WaPodeaths /100,000 population
1.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 Statewide free speech in public places Catocoding,0-3
1.0 0.0 0.0 2 2
Statewide death row population NAACPnumber /100,000 population
1.0 2.3 1.2 10 9 Statewide right-to-work NCSLcoding,0-1
0.5 1.0 1.0 1 1
Statewide adult incarceration BJSnumber /100,000 adult population
1.0 1,300.0 1,310.0 10 10 Statewide press suppression USPFTnumber /100,000 state population
0.5 0.0 0.0 1 1
Statewide youth incarceration CJRPprisoners /100,000 youth population
0.5 86.7 49.4 1 3 Statewide invasive cell phone surveillance ACLUcoding,0-1
0.5 1.0 1.0 6 6
Statewide trafficking POLreports /100,000 population
1.0 3.5 3.5 1 1
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Absence of Legal Discrimination (5th)
25% 20.0 32.6 5 5 Social Tolerance (7th) 30% 56.3 49.3 5 7
Statewide religious freedom restoration act enacted
Catocoding,0-1
1.0 0.8 0.8 1 1 Hate group concentration SPLCnumber /100,000 population
1.0 3.0 25.2 3 5
Statewide employment anti-discrimination law Catocoding,0-1
1.0 0.0 0.0 5 5 Ethnic slur google traffic Googleindex,0-100
1.0 28.0 28.0 4 4
Statewide government discrimination based on sex prohibited
Catocoding,0-1
1.0 0.0 0.0 4 4 Statewide same sex marriage support PRRI percentage 0.5 47.0 53.0 7 8
Statewide affirmative action in public services banned
Catocoding,0-2
0.5 0.0 2.0 1 1Statewide LGBT non-discrimination law support
PRRI percentage 0.5 60.0 62.0 10 10
Statewide LGBT relationships & parenthood recognition
MAPcoding,0-9
0.5 2.5 3.5 3 3
Statewide LGBT non-discrimination laws MAPcoding,0-11
0.5 0.0 0.0 5 5
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Governance (10th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Political Accountability (4th) 30% 54.2 63.4 2 4 Rule of Law (10th) 35% 25.0 10.5 10 10
Statewide Elections Performance Index MITOverall Prosperity,0-1
1.5 0.6 0.6 9 10 Statewide Justice Index NCAJ index rank 1-51 1.5 51.0 44.0 10 10
Statewide gender balance in legislatures CAWP percentage 0.5 11.4 21.5 10 10 Statewide judicial integrity ATRFcoding,0-1
0.5 0.0 1.0 1 6
Statewide state campaign disclosure NIMPindex,0-1
1.0 0.9 1.0 4 1
Statewide term limits NCSLcoding,0-1
0.5 1.0 1.0 1 1
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Government Integrity (10th) 35% 47.8 37.5 8 10 #N/A #N/A ## ##
Statewide legal corruption perceptions ICSexpert survey,3-15
1.0 8.5 10.0 2 4
Statewide illegal corruption perceptions ICSexpert survey,3-15
1.0 6.5 7.0 3 3
Statewide Corruption Reflection Index ICSOverall Prosperity,0-1
0.5 0.3 0.5 3 10
Statewide State Integrity Investigation CPIindex rank,1-50
1.0 38.0 40.0 8 10
Statewide public record request compliance Cuillier percentage 1.0 31.0 31.0 10 10
Statewide Online Spending Transparency Index USPIRGOverall Prosperity,0-100
0.5 82.0 60.0 7 7
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Social Capital (9th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Personal and Family Relationships (9th)
25% 51.0 53.8 8 9 Social Networks (8th) 25% 53.7 33.7 5 8
Statewide divorce CDCinstances,/1,000 population
1.0 5.3 3.8 10 10 Favors between neighbors CPS percentage 1.0 44.5 26.0 4 8
Children in unmarried households Census percentage 1.0 20.6 34.3 3 8 Frequently talk with neighbors CPS percentage 1.0 71.0 54.0 2 3
Teen births CDCinstances /1,000 female 15-19 population
1.0 53.8 31.9 6 7 Trust in people in neighborhood CPS percentage 1.5 59.6 53.4 5 8
Statewide parent's attendance of children's activities
NSCH percentage 0.5 90.3 86.6 5 3 Statewide supportive neighborhood for a child NSCH percentage 1.0 52.9 54.0 5 6
Shared meals with household members CPS percentage 0.5 94.4 84.9 2 8 Statewide trust in people ANEScoding,0-1
0.5 0.5 0.5 7 7
Frequently hear from family and friends CPS percentage 1.0 80.0 91.5 7 1
Close friends CPS average 1.0 6.0 6.0 7 7
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Institutional Trust (9th) 20% 55.4 37.1 8 9 Civic and Social Participation (3rd)
30% 31.5 33.8 4 3
Confidence in corporations CPS percentage 1.0 67.4 55.5 4 9 Statewide volunteer rate CNCSinstances,/1,000 population
1.0 0.3 0.2 3 3
Confidence in the media CPS percentage 1.0 57.2 50.4 9 8 Statewide volunteering intensity CNCShours,per capita
1.0 36.7 37.7 2 1
Statewide trust in federal government ANEScoding,0-1
0.5 0.3 0.3 10 10 Statewide active in neighborhood CNCS percentage 1.0 5.4 8.2 9 2
Statewide helping the community CNCSinstances,/1,000
1.0 1.3 2.0 7 3
(Non-religious) membership organizations Censusnumber /1,000 population
1.0 0.1 0.1 10 10
Religious membership organizations USRCnumber /1,000 population
0.5 3.8 3.8 2 2
Religious organization participation CPS percentage 0.5 21.4 25.0 3 4
Sport or recreation organization participation CPS percentage 0.5 12.9 11.4 4 2
School, neighborhood or community association participation
CPS percentage 0.5 16.8 18.5 5 2
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Business Environment (8th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Financing Ecosystems (9th) 40% 22.2 14.6 8 9Domestic Market Contestability (8th)
30% 52.7 49.6 4 8
Venture capital invested NVCA $ /capita 1.0 1.8 0.0 9 9 Statewide low-income licensed occupations Inst Just number 1.5 41.0 41.0 5 5
Number of venture capital deals NVCAnumber /1,000,000
1.0 1.0 0.0 8 9 Statewide occupational licensing training cost Inst Just $ 1.0 234.0 234.0 4 4
Assets under management NVCA $ /capita 1.0 3.6 0.0 7 9 Statewide occupational licensing training time Inst Just days 1.0 399.0 399.0 7 7
Venture capital fundraising NVCA $ /capita 1.0 0.0 0.0 6 5 Statewide age requirements for license Inst Just years 1.0 10.0 10.0 2 2
Bank branch access FDICnumber /square mile
1.5 0.0 0.0 8 8 Statewide regulation density index CatoOverall Prosperity
1.0 0.0 0.0 6 5
New Foreign Direct Investment BEA $ /capita 1.0 1,716.0 1,716.0 7 7
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Burden of Regulation (6th) 10% 57.5 42.8 2 6 Labor Market Flexibility (5th) 10% 71.2 69.8 6 5
Statewide Federal Regulation and State Enterprise Index
QuantGovOverall Prosperity
1.0 0.9 1.1 1 4Statewide collective bargaining agreement coverage
FI percent 1.0 6.9 7.1 5 5
Statewide state regulation QuantGov percent 1.0 1.6 1.6 6 6 Statewide employee health insurance cost HJK $ 0.5 4,067.0 5,337.0 2 4
Workers Compensation Premium Rate State OR $ per $100 0.5 2.9 1.0 9 6
Statewide minimum wage DOL $ 1.0 7.3 7.3 1 1
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Price Distortions (2nd) 10% 86.5 85.5 1 2 #N/A #N/A ## ##
Statewide subsidies to the private sector BEA percent 1.0 0.1 0.1 4 5
Statewide Corporate Tax Score Tax FoundOverall Prosperity
1.0 5.9 5.8 1 3
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Market Access and Infrastructure (10th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Communications (9th) 40% 6.1 6.1 9 9 Resources (5th) 25% 56.7 56.9 4 5
Mean download speed BBN Mbps 1.5 16.6 16.6 9 9 Customers affected by electricity outages Mukherjeenumber /10,000 population
0.5 0.0 0.0 5 7
Ultra-fast internet access BBN percent 1.0 0.0 0.0 8 8 Statewide net electricity generation EIA kWh /capita 1.0 0.0 0.0 1 1
Fast internet access BBN percent 1.0 41.4 41.4 9 9 Water usage USGS Mgal /capita 1.0 0.1 0.1 8 8
Internet providers (Business) FCC number 0.5 9.0 9.0 8 8 Electricity outage duration EIA minutes 1.0 103.7 106.4 7 5
Electricity outage frequency EIA per year 1.0 1.1 1.2 5 7
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Transport (7th) 35% 40.0 40.0 7 7 #N/A #N/A ## ##
Statewide number of airports BTSnumber /square mile
0.5 0.0 0.0 6 6
Road condition BTS percent 1.5 10.5 10.5 4 4
Statewide railroad length AARmiles /square mile
1.0 0.0 0.0 4 4
Bus transit route mileage BTSmiles /square mile
0.5 0.0 0.0 9 9
Public road density BTSmiles /square mile
1.0 1.1 1.1 1 1
Bridge condition BTS percent 0.5 1.0 1.0 3 3
Distance to airport BTS km 1.0 95.3 95.3 8 8
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Economic Quality (8th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Fiscal Sustainability (9th) 25% 41.0 47.2 8 9Productivity and Competitiveness (7th)
25% 38.6 57.3 8 7
Statewide government credit rating Ballotpedia rating 0.5 7.0 7.0 4 7 Export value (goods) BIEM $ /capita 1.0 2,688.3 4,842.0 5 4
Statewide state reserves capacity Pew days 1.0 20.7 27.3 7 10 Export value (services) BIEM $ /capita 0.5 695.9 580.8 6 8
Government revenue to expenditure ratio Census ratio 1.0 1.1 1.1 2 2 Labor productivity BLS $ per hour 1.5 52.7 61.5 8 6
Statewide state budget balance Pew $ /capita 1.0 77.1 114.6 8 10
Statewide state pension funding FR percent 1.0 44.3 53.8 7 2
Debt-to-GDP ratio Census percent 1.0 1,025.0 804.7 9 9
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Dynamism (2nd) 20% 53.2 60.8 4 2 Labor Force Engagement (9th) 30% 39.0 51.6 7 9
Startup concentration Kauffmannumber /1,000 businesses
0.5 95.9 72.9 8 8 Unemployment BLS percent 1.0 10.7 6.0 9 10
Startup early job creation Kauffmannumber /1,000 population
1.0 6.6 5.5 1 8 Youth unemployment Census percent 1.0 25.1 19.9 9 9
Startup early survival rate Kauffman percent 0.5 79.4 81.5 2 1 Employee Engagement Gallup percent 0.5 34.0 35.0 1 4
Opportunity-driven startups Kauffman percent 1.0 88.2 87.7 2 2 Statewide underemployment BLS percent 1.0 3.2 1.9 1 1
Rate of new entrepreneurs Kauffmannumber /100,000 population
1.5 348.0 413.0 7 4 Labor force participation Census percent 1.5 57.9 49.7 7 9
Patent applications USPTO number /1,000 1.0 0.0 97.7 6 4
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Living Conditions (10th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Material Resources (9th) 25% 48.8 47.9 7 9 Nutrition (10th) 15% 25.6 42.4 10 10
Low income Census percentage 1.0 26.0 32.7 5 8 Food security FA percentage 1.0 80.0 82.0 9 9
Poverty Census percentage 1.0 15.1 18.9 5 8 Statewide borderline food security USDA percentage 1.0 93.5 93.9 10 10
Deep poverty Census percentage 1.0 7.1 7.4 7 7 Fruit consumption BRFSS percentage 0.5 48.9 53.0 10 10
Liquid asset poverty Pros Now percentage 1.0 42.4 42.4 7 7 Vegetable consumption BRFSS percentage 0.5 73.9 83.0 9 1
Statewide high risk loans Talk Pov percentage 1.0 13.1 10.8 10 10
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Water Services (10th) 15% 28.6 32.9 10 10 Shelter (5th) 15% 45.0 59.5 8 5
Statewide clean and safe water Gallup percentage 0.5 91.7 89.9 10 10 Homelessness HUDnumber / 10,000 population
0.5 7.3 5.5 1 2
Public drinking water violations CHRScore,0 or 1
1.0 1.0 1.0 5 6 Unsheltered homeless rate HUD percentage 0.5 63.8 25.9 7 4
Complete kitchen and plumbing facilities HUD percentage 1.0 97.6 98.6 10 8 Households with overcrowding HUD percentage 1.0 4.2 2.8 9 7
Availability of affordable housing UIunits / 100 very low income tenants
1.0 11.0 18.0 5 4
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Connectedness (9th) 15% 28.2 45.2 6 9 Protection from Harm (10th) 15% 27.5 36.0 10 10
Access to broadband FCC percentage 1.5 28.9 48.1 6 9 Fatalities from unintentional injuries CDCdeaths / 100,000 population
1.0 33.9 33.9 10 10
Households with a smartphone Census percentage 1.0 59.0 64.9 8 8 Traffic deaths CDCnumber / 100,000 population
1.0 26.7 20.5 9 7
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Health (10th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Behavioral Risk Factors (9th) 15% 47.7 48.7 8 9Preventative Interventions (7th)
15% 28.6 33.4 7 7
Obesity CDC percentage 1.0 33.1 34.7 10 7 Adult dentist visits BRFSS percentage 0.5 59.9 55.8 7 7
Smoking CHR percentage 1.5 22.3 21.0 8 10 Adult doctor visits BRFSS percentage 0.5 62.0 66.3 8 5
Alcohol use disorderDUH Nat
Srvypercentage 0.5 5.3 5.3 3 3 Colorectal cancer screening BRFSS percentage 0.5 59.4 60.6 7 7
Illicit drug use disorderDUH Nat
Srvypercentage 0.5 2.1 2.1 2 2 Statewide child medical visits NSCH percentage 0.5 83.5 77.1 9 7
Pain reliever misuseDUH Nat
Srvypercentage 0.5 5.1 5.1 9 9 Statewide HPV immunizations NCIRD percentage 1.0 39.2 37.9 7 10
Pap smear test BRFSS percentage 0.5 73.6 77.8 10 7
Statewide child immunization NCIRD percentage 1.0 51.9 67.3 1 7
Statewide child dentist visits NSCH percentage 0.5 77.5 77.1 9 10
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Care Systems (4th) 15% 54.0 58.4 4 4 Mental Health (10th) 15% 40.2 38.4 10 10
Statewide child mental health access NSCH percentage 1.0 24.1 24.1 1 1 Suicide CDCdeaths / 100,000 population
1.0 15.8 20.2 8 8
Adults with no health care coverage CHR percentage 0.5 21.8 19.5 5 8 Drug overdose deaths CDCdeaths / 100,000 population
0.5 14.6 18.3 9 9
Avoided medical care due to cost BRFSS percentage 1.0 17.9 16.5 5 5 Serious mental illnessDUH Nat
Srvypercentage 1.0 5.3 4.6 10 8
Hospital rating HCA percentage 0.5 76.9 84.0 4 1Statewide disability weighted prevalence from mental illness
IMHEyears / 100,000 population
1.0 2,214.9 2,215.0 8 8
Preventable hospitalizations for medicare enrolees
CHRdischarges / 100,000
1.0 4,964.0 5,203.0 7 7 Self-reported mental health not good CHR percentage 1.0 14.0 16.1 10 10
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Physical Health (10th) 20% 35.4 30.0 10 10 Longevity (8th) 20% 39.2 52.1 10 8
High blood pressure BRFSS percentage 1.0 35.0 35.9 10 10 Under 5 death rate CDCdeaths / 100,000 under 5 population
1.0 179.1 163.1 9 9
Diabetes CDC percentage 1.0 10.3 15.0 8 9 5-14 death rate CDCdeaths / 100,000 5-14 population
0.5 20.2 16.0 9 9
Heart attack BRFSS percentage 1.0 5.4 4.7 10 10 15-64 death rate CDCdeaths / 100,000 15-64 population
2.0 519.0 391.6 10 7
Statewide disability weighted prevalence of infectious diseases
IMHEyears / 100,000 population
0.5 369.7 365.8 5 5 Maternal mortality IMHEdeaths / 100,000 population
0.5 0.5 0.5 8 8
Self-reported poor physical health CHR percentage 1.0 14.5 15.1 10 10 Mortality risk 65-85 IMHE percentage 1.0 58.1 55.3 7 7
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Education (6th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Pre-Primary Education (2nd) 5% 65.5 65.3 2 2 Primary Education (6th) 20% 50.1 54.8 6 6
Pre-primary enrollment Census percentage 2.0 49.6 49.4 4 4 Math grade 4 level SEDA grade level 2.0 3.3 3.2 8 8
Statewide state pre-K quality NIEEROverall Prosperity,0-10
1.0 9.0 9.0 1 1 Statewide science grade 4 score NAEPscale score,0-300
1.5 148.1 153.4 3 6
English, language and arts grade 4 level SEDA grade level 2.0 3.2 3.6 8 7
Primary enrollment Census percentage 1.0 99.6 99.5 2 2
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Secondary Education (5th) 25% 47.8 61.8 8 5 Tertiary Education (9th) 25% 35.6 31.0 6 9
Math grade 8 level SEDA grade level 1.5 6.7 8.1 9 5 College enrollment Census percentage 1.0 42.2 34.0 2 3
Statewide science grade 8 score NAEPscale score,0-500
1.0 146.5 151.0 9 8 Statewide college graduation rate NCES percentage 1.0 44.2 47.9 9 8
English, language and arts grade 8 level SEDA grade level 1.5 7.0 7.7 8 5Statewide university quality for enrolled students
QS RankLegatum Institute score
1.0 0.2 0.1 9 9
High school graduation rate CHR percentage 1.0 72.5 85.2 9 8 Community college graduation rate NCES percentage 1.0 29.4 27.0 6 7
Secondary enrollment Census percentage 1.0 100.0 98.2 1 4
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Adult Skills (6th) 25% 35.4 47.0 7 6 #N/A #N/A ## ##
Adult population with at least a high school diploma
Census percentage 1.0 81.3 87.8 6 5
Adult population with bachelor's degree or higher
Census percentage 1.0 13.8 17.2 8 7
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Latimer, Oklahoma: Natural Environment (9th decile*)
Italics: Indicator contains imputed values
Value Value
2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Emissions (8th) 25% 52.2 55.6 8 8 Exposure to Air Pollution (9th) 25% 32.2 40.2 9 9
Toxic air releases EPAindex,0-1
2.0 1.0 1.0 4 4 Life expectancy loss from air pollution JBEN years 2.0 0.2 0.2 9 9
CO2 emissions EPAindex,0-1
2.0 0.4 0.5 10 9 Fine particulate matter exposure OECDmicrograms per cubic meter
1.0 9.8 7.4 7 7
Nitrous oxide emissions EPAindex,0-1
0.5 0.4 0.4 9 9
Carbon monoxide emissions EPAindex,0-1
0.5 0.3 0.4 10 10
PM2.5 emissions EPAindex,0-1
0.5 0.3 0.4 10 9
Sulfur dioxide emissions EPAindex,0-1
0.5 0.7 0.8 9 9
Ozone emissions EPAindex,0-1
0.5 0.3 0.3 9 9
Lead emissions EPAindex,0-1
0.5 1.0 1.0 2 2
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Forest, Land and Soil (8th) 20% 41.0 41.3 6 8 Freshwater (5th) 20% 71.5 72.0 6 5
Toxic land releases EPA lb / square mile 1.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 Statewide good quality rivers and streams EPA percentage 0.5 23.5 23.5 8 8
Statewide rural parks and wildlife areas USDA percentage 1.0 1.2 1.2 10 10Statewide good quality lakes, resevoirs and ponds
EPA percentage 0.5 16.9 16.9 7 7
Statewide compliant underground storage tanks facilities
EPA percentage 1.0 76.0 53.0 1 10 Total freshwater withdrawals per capita USGSmillion gallons / 1,000 population
1.0 0.3 0.2 4 3
Statewide exposure to pesticides CDCnumber / 100,000 population
1.0 69.1 49.4 10 10 Toxic water releases EPA lb / square mile 1.0 0.0 0.0 1 1
Tree canopy cover NLCD percentage 1.0 58.4 57.8 2 2
Wetlands and deepwater habitats USFWS percentage 1.0 3.5 3.5 6 6
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
Preservation Efforts (5th) 10% 6.6 6.6 5 5 #N/A #N/A ## ##
Statewide GAP 1 protected areas USGS percentage 2.0 0.3 0.3 8 8
Statewide GAP 2 protected areas USGS percentage 1.5 2.1 2.1 5 5
Statewide GAP 3 protected areas USGS percentage 1.0 1.1 1.1 8 8
Value Value2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020 2010 10-yr trend 2020 2010 2020
#N/A #N/A ## ## #N/A #N/A ## ##
* The 829 counties in the 8 states have been grouped into deciles, for each pillar, element and indicator. Counties in the 1st decile are the strongest performers and those in the 10th decile are the weakest.
Source Unit Weight Decile
Source Unit Weight DecileSource Unit Unit Decile
Source Unit Unit Decile
Decile
Source Unit Weight Decile Unit Weight DecileSource
Decile Source Unit WeightSource Unit Weight
Glossary
Source Code Source NameAAR Association of American RailroadsACLU American Civil Liberties UnionANES American National Election StudiesATRF American Tort Reform AssociationBallotpedia BallotpediaBBN BroadbandNowBEA United States Bureau of Economic AnalysisBIEM Brookings Institution Export MonitorBJS United States Bureau of Justice StatisticsBLS United States Bureau of Labour StatisticsBRFSS Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemBTS United States Bureau of Transportation StatisticsCato Cato - Freedom in the 50 StatesCAWP Center for American Women and PoliticsCDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - Diabetes AtlasCDC Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCDC Center for Disease Control (WONDER)CDC CDC National Environmental Public Health Tracking NetworkCensus United States Census BureauCensus United States Census Bureau, American Community SurveyCensus US Census BureauCHR County Health RankingsCJRP Census of Juveniles in Residential PlacementCNCS Corporation for National and Community Service, Volunteering & Civil Life in AmericaCPI Center for Public IntegrityCPS Current Population Survey, Civic Engagement SupplementCuillier Dave CuillierDOL United States Department of LaborDUH Nat Srvy Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, The National Survey on Drug Use and HealthEIA United States Energy Information AdministrationEPA United States Environmental Protection AgencyFA Feeding AmericaFCC Federal Communications CommissionFDIC Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationFI Fraser InstituteFR Federal ReserveFTC Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Sentinel NetworkGallup GallupGoogle Google TrendsGTD Global Terrorism DatabaseGVA Gun Violence ArchiveHCA Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and SystemsHJK Henry J Kaiser Family FoundationHUD United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentICS Institute for Corruption StudiesIMHE Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationInst Just Institute for JusticeJBEN Bennett et al. 2019. "Particulate matter air pollution and national and county life expectancy loss in the USA: A spatiotemporal analysis".Kauffman Kauffman FoundationMAP Movement Advancement ProjectMIT MIT Election and Data Science Lab coding of state policiesMukherjee Mukherjee et al.NAACP National Association for the Advancement of Colored PeopleNACJD National Archive Of Criminal Justice DataNAEP National Assessment of Educational Progress NCAJ National Center for Access to JusticeNCES National Center for Education StatisticsNCIRD National Center for Immunization and Respiratory DiseasesNCSL National Conference of State LegislaturesNIEER National Institute for Early Education ResearchNIMP National Institute on Money in PoliticsNLCD National Land Cover DatabaseNSCH National Survey of Children's HealthNVCA National Venture Capital AssociationOECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentPew Pew Research CenterPOL Polaris ProjectPros Now Prosperity Now ScorecardPRRI Public Religion Research InstituteQS Rank QS World University RankingsQuantGov QuantGovSEDA Stanford Education Data ArchiveSPLC Southern Poverty Law CenterState OR State of OregonTalk Pov Talk PovertyTax Found Tax FoundationUI Urban InstituteUSDA United States Department of AgricultureUSFWS United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceUSGS United States Geological SurveyUSPFT United States Press Freedom TrackerUSPIRG United States Public Interest Research GroupUSPTO United States Patent and Trademark OfficeUSRC United States Religious CensusWaPo Washington Post